@Huzzawful Try "Titus Andronicus." Most literary critics, even those who adore Shakespeare, can't seem to write more than two pages about it (Bloom, Goddard, etc.). I can't think of any film productions beside the great BBC one and Julie Taymor's...colorful... adaptation "Titus" with Anthony Hopkins. Not only lots of murder and rape but also a nice scene where Titus surreptitiously feeds Tamora her children for dinner. Yikes.
i love this version as it hold obvious postmodern qualities and contemporary interpretations that are super easy to include in my essays/speech's.
however despite being a young, hip angsty teen (as we all are) , I wouldhave to prefer the Brannagh as a work in whole. This just seems like a shallow interpretation to me.
@newerawearer Do we need "postmodern" Shakespeare? Watch the BBC TV productions from the 70's and 80's. Miles ahead of most film adaptations in my opinion -- the acting carries it. I can do without "Sword"-brand guns, hip music, and modern settings. The words and the actors seem to be enough!
true true, but like i said, the use of contemporary settings and hipness makes this a super easy comparison text when looking at hamlet inerpretations.
I just can't relate to the older Hamlets, I need something younger, angsty and more relevant to me, when I read insights into this character, I think of the stuff I'm going through so I can't watch some men on a horse talking high theatre and dressed in tights. I can do that for Romeo and Juliet which I've never related to but not Hamlet.
this is the worst version of hamlet but its the funniest one because its in modern time. Well no i lied the mel gibson version is the worse hamlet. The Branaugh version is the best one.
Can anyone put the whole movie up? As for whether it's better than Branagh's or not, it's more cinematic. From the clips I've seen of Branagh's, it reverts to stage mannerisms.
this is crap-watch kenneth brannaghs one or when it comes out the one with david tennant in it-both very good interpretations of hamlet-this one suckd
maybe - just maybe, you have to suppose i watch them all, and not only english interpretations, and you have to develop your taste a little ;)
if you have no instruments for interpretation of films like that, which use postmodern logic and symbolic/structural/pattern syntax for the palette of techniques they employ, you can hardly judge them.
and if you think - "that's not what Shakespeare'd ment" - well, I've read Hamlet a couple of times, and i can still discover something new every time ;)
u don't understand. this one is terrible! or in spanish: terrible! ur teacher's an idiot then? i'm doing u a favor by warning u, I'm saying u WUD b an idiot if u were gonna watch this on your own will.
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
icebird753 1 year ago
@icebird753 ?
ik4rm 1 year ago
didn't have the decency to say the "goodnight, sweet prince..." line!?!
xNickTheBrickx 1 year ago 3
@xNickTheBrickx made me wonder, also
ik4rm 1 year ago
@ik4rm it got cut off, they did a slightly abridged version of it.
burntheretic 1 year ago
@xNickTheBrickx They did. Just watch the movie before you make a statement.
Deliree 1 year ago
@xNickTheBrickx He does it, the video just ends right before he delivers it.
D0abarrelr0ll 11 months ago
@xNickTheBrickx i think he does...
afterwardswhat 7 months ago
hamlet is probably the most depressing of shakespears tragedies
Huzzawful 1 year ago
@Huzzawful
You would be surprised, but Hamlet is a comedy. Dark, noir, sarcastic, ill-tempered, brilliant comedy XD
ik4rm 1 year ago
@Huzzawful Try "Titus Andronicus." Most literary critics, even those who adore Shakespeare, can't seem to write more than two pages about it (Bloom, Goddard, etc.). I can't think of any film productions beside the great BBC one and Julie Taymor's...colorful... adaptation "Titus" with Anthony Hopkins. Not only lots of murder and rape but also a nice scene where Titus surreptitiously feeds Tamora her children for dinner. Yikes.
sleepcity 1 year ago
did anyone else think this version was complete crap and just a copy of baz lurhmans romeo and juliet
chelseeexo 1 year ago
@chelseeexo No.
HenryKrinkle666 1 year ago
casey affleck was in this movie, but I can't find any videos of him for this movie. I wonder what scene he was in.
MsNYG619 1 year ago
I have no problem with "modern interpretations" of Shakespeare, but this film just seems so flat.
swannavon 1 year ago
nice movie.....
movies5star 1 year ago
i love this version as it hold obvious postmodern qualities and contemporary interpretations that are super easy to include in my essays/speech's.
however despite being a young, hip angsty teen (as we all are) , I wouldhave to prefer the Brannagh as a work in whole. This just seems like a shallow interpretation to me.
newerawearer 1 year ago
@newerawearer Do we need "postmodern" Shakespeare? Watch the BBC TV productions from the 70's and 80's. Miles ahead of most film adaptations in my opinion -- the acting carries it. I can do without "Sword"-brand guns, hip music, and modern settings. The words and the actors seem to be enough!
sleepcity 1 year ago
@sleepcity
true true, but like i said, the use of contemporary settings and hipness makes this a super easy comparison text when looking at hamlet inerpretations.
it's just so easy for a student
newerawearer 1 year ago
I just can't relate to the older Hamlets, I need something younger, angsty and more relevant to me, when I read insights into this character, I think of the stuff I'm going through so I can't watch some men on a horse talking high theatre and dressed in tights. I can do that for Romeo and Juliet which I've never related to but not Hamlet.
Renabulous 1 year ago
this is the worst version of hamlet but its the funniest one because its in modern time. Well no i lied the mel gibson version is the worse hamlet. The Branaugh version is the best one.
RobTheBernardinosaur 2 years ago
Can anyone put the whole movie up? As for whether it's better than Branagh's or not, it's more cinematic. From the clips I've seen of Branagh's, it reverts to stage mannerisms.
missbabyice 2 years ago
you should try p2p networks ,)
ik4rm 2 years ago
this is crap-watch kenneth brannaghs one or when it comes out the one with david tennant in it-both very good interpretations of hamlet-this one suckd
bulletcookiegirl 2 years ago
maybe - just maybe, you have to suppose i watch them all, and not only english interpretations, and you have to develop your taste a little ;)
if you have no instruments for interpretation of films like that, which use postmodern logic and symbolic/structural/pattern syntax for the palette of techniques they employ, you can hardly judge them.
and if you think - "that's not what Shakespeare'd ment" - well, I've read Hamlet a couple of times, and i can still discover something new every time ;)
ik4rm 2 years ago
where did u get this movie from?
sexykarito 2 years ago
DON'T BE AN IDIOT! THIS ONE SUCKED! order Kenneth Branaugh's version from Barnes and Noble.
WHSfightclub 2 years ago
excuse me?? why are u call me an idiot ? thats so rude! n no i need to watch this one for my english class!!
sexykarito 2 years ago
u don't understand. this one is terrible! or in spanish: terrible! ur teacher's an idiot then? i'm doing u a favor by warning u, I'm saying u WUD b an idiot if u were gonna watch this on your own will.
WHSfightclub 2 years ago
Kenneth Branaugh's version SUCKED u r such a wud be idiot !@@!@ OMG OMG OMG
esxcoe 2 years ago
YOU'RE AN IDIOT !@!@ !!! !!@ !#@!
esxcoe 2 years ago
wow, we're talking about Shakespeare here, if you want to be rude, at least do it with finesse!
ik4rm 2 years ago
@ik4rm that comment made my day
mailboxmatty 2 years ago
me too ^^
shezzos 1 year ago