Unfortunately . . . he's not as knowledgeable about and sure-footed with sexuality as he is with many other aspects of spiritual practise.
He's not connecting sexual energy to Chi . . . which (since Chi is connected to Impermanence -- as he's himself discussed in another video) would allow him to understand it as a way to practise with Impermanence and approach enlightenment.
this dirt/dirty analogy is confusing and then u mix in craving, aversion and unconsciousness which you say obscure the clear window. first off, are you talking about sex without love, sex with no affection? the liberation potential in the act of making love can be potentially a meditation? i suggest that you consider staying in the moment and don't substitute meditation for making love, then the act with deliver more pleasure not when you are thinking, thinking and thinking again. learn to love!
Unfortunately . . . he's not as knowledgeable about and sure-footed with sexuality as he is with many other aspects of spiritual practise.
He's not connecting sexual energy to Chi . . . which (since Chi is connected to Impermanence -- as he's himself discussed in another video) would allow him to understand it as a way to practise with Impermanence and approach enlightenment.
greenrate 9 months ago
this dirt/dirty analogy is confusing and then u mix in craving, aversion and unconsciousness which you say obscure the clear window. first off, are you talking about sex without love, sex with no affection? the liberation potential in the act of making love can be potentially a meditation? i suggest that you consider staying in the moment and don't substitute meditation for making love, then the act with deliver more pleasure not when you are thinking, thinking and thinking again. learn to love!
vjliberatori 1 year ago