Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on two simple postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time itself photon by photon
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event
@nickharvey7 I think that classical physics is an approximation. In my opinion there is a mass function that function inversely proportional to something else.. and this dissappears in classical physics.. so the smaller we go this approximation no longer works and classical physics does not work. But anyway from what I know string theory bridged the gap between those 2.. but I am not a physicist myself to give a better comment :) Awesome comment tho..
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on two simple postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time itself photon by photon
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event
nickharvey7 6 months ago
@nickharvey7 I think that classical physics is an approximation. In my opinion there is a mass function that function inversely proportional to something else.. and this dissappears in classical physics.. so the smaller we go this approximation no longer works and classical physics does not work. But anyway from what I know string theory bridged the gap between those 2.. but I am not a physicist myself to give a better comment :) Awesome comment tho..
howlifebegan 6 months ago