This wholly mess is falling around the ankles of these proponents of the Death Penalty when we think destroying someones life over sex is the right things too do? This wasteful conduct will not be tolerated anymore with such flimsy unjust and worthless reasoning. Take the S.O. laws and push them out with the trash that came up with this Tom foolery. It cant be justified & what is being done will not exist any more for sex reasons. Can't kill people for sex get outa politics wishful murders.
If you care to know how much it COSTS to put a repeat sex offender into a state hospital it varies from $160,000 - $70,000 (160K - 70K). To house a prisoner - about $20,000/year.
Laws should be re-written so that a second offense = LIFE with NO PAROLE.
First sentence should be at least 20-years.
LETS GET THIS CORRECT:
CHEMICAL CASTRATION = injections lasting 2-weeks / Lupron implant lasts up to 6-months (titanium).
SURGICAL CASTRATION (not "physical castration") is what it is.
Bobby Jindal for president 2012. He is completely right these sick monsters don't deserve to be treated as humans. They should be tortured in the most painful way possible and be executed by burning them alive. SHAME on the faggot ass liberal judges who voted against this I hope someone in their family gets raped so they know how it feels.
Dude, much as I agree with your sentiments, thats fucked up. You should never wish for a man's family members to be raped to teach him a lesson because its not their fault their husband/father/whatever is a moron. You're wishing rape on an innocent person to teach the justice a lesson. The justice is guilty...their wife/child is NOT. I only hope you're kidding here.
DarthSociopath thank you for not using profanity in your comments. I totally agree with you I was wrong. I don't wish rape on any good person. I just hope that GOD burns the judges that voted no in this case in the 7th layer of hell for eternity. Thank you for making me realise my mistake. Take care
And let me be clear: I believe in the death penalty for ALL rapes and ALL child molestations. I think child rapists should be executed painfully, brutally, and publically. Frankly, I wouldn't criticize you too sharply if you wished something like that on the justices themselves. But their wives and children are not at fault for their stupidity. If you are serious about wishing rape on their families, you're just as bad as the child rapists.
His mom came over while she was expecting to give birth in the U.S. he's another citizenship jackpot baby can you guess who paid for it.(LOL) Piyush Jindal is a joke and a puppet He's another "Rapepublican" freak show.You have a City still messed up from Hurricane Katrina and he's playing politics like Condoleezza Rice when her and "W" Dumb Ass turned down help from other countries during the hurricane because they didn't want anyone to see that they didn't have their stuff together.
Piyush Jindal is a joke and a puppet and yes that's his real name. He's another "Rapepublican" freak show.You have a City still very fucked up from Hurricane Katrina and he's play politics like Condoleezza Rice when her and "W" Dumb Ass turned down help from other countries during the hurricane because they did'nt want anyone to see that they did not have their shit wasn't together.
Quick comments. I think child rapists are worse than murderers because they leave children tramatized and many of the children harmed end up doing horrible things in their future because of these tramatization. My wife and I have taken in a fifteen year old who was abused as a child and now beats the crap out of other kids and is irrational.
She wants the absolute worst done to her rapist. However, she has severe anger issues. Civil solutions are the true answer, NOT CASTRATION!
Go Jindal Go! Here Gov Jindal says he does not care about the popularity because its right. Only a liberal can feel bad for a child molester. A molester is raping kids and people look at the offender as the victim. I would support this bill 100%. You got nothing to worry about if you don't rape kids, but I guess people that are against this is a dumb liberal. Child molesters deserve to be burned alive and then be put out before they die so they can live like a freak.
Without his nuts, a sex offender is physically much weaker as doesn't produce testosterone, and therefore loses a lot of muscle. This a is a great bill. So what if castration is cruel and usual. What the rapist did to his victim is cruel and unusual. Gotta commend Bobby Jindal!!! Great work!!
Not to mention the fact that without testicles, he can't produce the necessary hormones to maintain an erection. It renders him impotent, and he can never rape again. You're right, castration is a very fitting punishment for this very brutal crime.
He can never rape again with his penis. He CAN rape again with an object. It's happened before, it will happen again. Unless we lock them up for life as well as castrate them.
Now lets say we opt for physical castration. But that doesn't ensure safety either. Castrated rapists can (and do) reoffend using objects to penetrate the victim (especially since it's often about power/control, not sex per se) And IMAGINE how pissed off a nut-less rapist will be and how much he will take it out on his next victim. Even without his balls, a sex offender is still dangerous. Life sentences are expensive, but with no death penalty, even with castration we don't have a choice.
Well, testosterone influences male anger...but its not the only factor otherwise female anger would be inexplicable (they have a little testosterone, but not much, no where near male levels and there have certainly been no shortage of very violent females.) A man without his nuts is still dangerous and can still hurt people much like a women who never had nuts can.
Agreed, I'm just saying keep them in prison for life as well as castrate them. The life sentence is expensive, but we can't put a dollar figure on protecting children.
You a scumbag! You say ok to cut? Is you? No the problem is tostesterone is inside body! Sexual offenders will still have that even if castration. Sexual offenders the problem is for they need feel powerful, not cut off dicks, is no help for the problem
1. Dude, you're fucking illiterate...PLEASE gain a grasp of proper grammar and semantics before you post here...your idiocy disgusts me.
2. I have REPEATEDLY said here that I believe castration must be used in conjunction with either life WITHOUT parole or the death penalty (which I prefer) to be effective.
3. (again) In the name of all things holy, please tell me that you are either drunk or 13 years old...otherwise your grammatical structure is just too sad to excuse!
Dude, I get it and I halfway apologize...I looked at your profile after you posted and saw you were from Finland. But it IS a problem when you try to comment on MY country's politics and I can't even understand what you are saying!
To respond to your comment on my page, NO, I do NOT want my dick cut off. But...I DON'T RAPE LITTLE CHILDREN! What do YOU think should be done with child rapists dude? I think they should be executed...but if we cannot execute them, I think they should be put in prison for life with NO chance of parole. What do YOU think?
Yes, you see the ppl is sex offenders they're sick fucks ! It's castration ppl make it sound that helps solve the problem! Noooo it doesn't help, I say these criminals they need to stay away for the public is safe and no problem! I make a suggest that they go inside the prison and after is sentence is finish, thye need to go to mental hospitals. Stay away for people safe! They sick scumb bags
I wanna kill and toture Josef Fritzl brutal! What Fritzl is done are disgusting very terrible! USA is too soft for criminals!!! Is the reasoning for they comit the crimes many times!!! These scumbags thinks they will get away with that!!! See here not make too much crime. Is very strcit
Here is forced for the criminlas to learn skills while inside in the prison!! So they go out and not come back!!
Is my say that USA is thinking too much of the rights of the criminlas!! What happens when the criminals are aoutside the prison? They not know nothing!!! Ok go kill, rape, robb whatever agian!! USA ppl is pay for the offenders to go prison!! Taxes pay for them! I think ppl for the USA get more angry with goverment of USA
I say for men who rape,,, they go prison and go out of prison! The dick cut off not help the problem!! I say they go to prison and when come out they need to live in mental hospital forever... Is these men very terrible,, no change,, is shit ppl
Bobby Jindal is a good man, and I'm proud to have him as my governor. I support the castration law. THAT SAID, it's extremely dangerous to think castration can take the place of a life sentence for a child rapist. Allow me to explain why: Chemical castration can be reversed in several ways. The offender can abscond from his parole officer and thus no longer take the shots, or can take the shots but also shoot up testosterone to reverse the effects.
How can we continue funding prisons which are becoming unpopular on both the right and left wings of politics. Dems oppose them due to the high number of minorities and Republicans oppose it due to the extra tax burden. The proposal for more prisons will likely be a dead end with no results. Supreme Court has ruled against a death penalty. You can't let these people go without at least a substantial penalty. So this seems to be a the only middle ground which may be at least somewhat effective
Politics is VERY often a "damned if you do, damned if you dont" game. Just because prisons are unpopular doesn't mean we cut back on them. Simply put, if we let child rapists out, we're taking an unjustifiable risk with our kids, even with castration. This is why the LA law imposes castration in ADDITION to prison, NOT instead of it. And under LA law, child rape carries MANDATORY LWOP. My point is: prisons are expensive...this sucks...but there is no alternative if we care about our children.
Thanks man...I appreciate it. Now, as to cost I think we put FAR too many nonviolent offenders in jail (druggies for example) We can cut a LOT of prison costs if we take alternative routes with them. This will allow us to save space for the true predators who need to be there. The cost sucks I know but a child's innocence is worth more than any tax burden.
Of course there is nothing wrong with putting violent criminals which pose a danger to other people behind bars, but nonviolent people "guilty" of victimless crimes ought not be kidnapped for exercising their liberties. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the entire world. We need less prisons, not more. If we just let the stoners go, it will be a huge victory for individual liberty, we can cut back on prisons, and tax money will be saved.
Here's a novel idea, let nonviolent criminals who pose no danger to society free! A huge percentage of prisoners are "guilty" of victimless nonviolent crimes. Letting the potheads free will lessen the tax burden and be a huge victory for individual liberty.
Yes, they do take up valuable prison real estate, but the larger issue here is a moral one. To lock a nonviolent person up for making bad personal decisions is totally contrary to the principle of indvidiual liberty. It's none of your business whether I use recreational drugs other than alcohol or not. Now if the individual using drugs begins to steal or hold up convenient stores in order to finance his personal decision, then of course he should go to prison. Otherwise, it is no one's business.
Well put! Locking up potheads is both counterproductive and morally questionable. I assume you don't have any problems with locking up murderers, rapists, and child molesters for life?
By the way, Merry Christmas and thanks for your well thought out comments.
My base instincts want to agree with Gov. Jindal here because I think these sick monsters deserve severe punishment and I could also see cases where the death penalty could be justifiable. But is it right to act on our base instincts here? I don't think we should allow our personal disgust of these crimes lead us to enact barbaric and cruel punishments on human beings. Honestly I think this is a case by case situation but no doubt its a tough issue with no real right or wrong answer.
True, Saadfeld. Personally, I think it is a perfectly appropriate punishment for child sex predators. They deserve to lose the function and hormones which makes them most dangerous to society. That way they can't rape any other innocent children.
I completely respect your opinion LatinoIndiano. And when it comes down to it, I agree with you to a certain extent because the safety of innocent children should be the first concern in rulings like this. But it still leaves me with concern that we would be walking a fine moral line, bordering on cruel/extreme punishment. Could a punishment like this create a precedent for others like it? When do we start flirting with the idea of simply lobotomizing violent criminals? Its a complicated issue.
It is quite complicated and you are right about precedents. But it's either that or a life sentence where you set up prisons with staff that cost millions if not billions to run and then see that predator quite probably murdered behind bars by other inmates after they've learned about his crime. Since the death sentence has been ruled out, those are the only two plausible scenarios. I believe that even most criminals would choose at least some freedom over a life sentence that may mean death.
Well what a criminal would choose is pretty irrelevant anyway, its not their choice to make. But I do understand what you're saying. I've actually been a pretty firm believer that life sentences are generally better punishments than the death penalty. Now obviously some crimes are so heinous that leaving the criminal alive is simply not justifiable, but often times I think life imprisonment is the ultimate punishment for any human being.
Louisiana is finally doing what it takes to keep it's most vulnarable residents safe. Fuck child predators, I wish them hell on earth. Or maybe you think the only crime worth the death penalty is growing inside a mother that doesn't want you?
Exactly right pimpdalyrical...no disrespect to the orginal commenter, but what do you mean "stone age?" Our governor is doing all he can to protect innocent children. I do have some reservations about the castration thing (which I've expressed in other posts)but the rights of child molesters do NOT factor in. Which is more valuable: the innocence of children or the rights of some rapist/child molester?
Also, castration of violent criminals isn't a bad idea either. First off it reduces their aggressie behavior considerably. Secondly, they are not fit too have any offsprings, meaning they won't make good parents and their children will become exactly the same. Castration is the best punishment for sex offendes and violent criminals.
Generally, I am socially liberal. However, the moral of this story is this : don't fuck little kids. I think we can all agree with that. Watch Lousiana have the lowest number of incidents of ANY state during this bill's 1st 365 days in effect
It's easier said than done in the case of the offenders. No, I'm NOT defending their actions at all(you and some of the people who commented here are smart enough to figure that out, I'm pointing it out to the idiots on here who don't do so because it involves thinking), I'm saying that most of them either are mentally ill or have at one point been victims of these crimes themselves as youngsters.
I am worried about statutory rape. i.e. . If a male high school senior sleeps with a high school freshman girl and gets caught, that boy will be turned into a eunuch from this chemical the government gives him?
I understand your reservations, but let me explain how the LA law actually works. It only allows castration for aggravated rape, forcible rape, second degree sexual battery, aggravated incest, molestation of a child under 13, and aggravated crime against nature. The scenerio of an 18 year old sleeping with a 14 year old is called under LA law "Felony Carnal Knowledge of a Juvenille" and while a felony, is NOT covered by the castration law. The law reserves castration for TRUE predators.
Exactly right...many people don't realize it, but the law does differentiate between a guy who sleeps with his underage girlfriend and a monster who rapes a kid. Under LA law, Felony Carnal Knowledge carries a maximum 10 year sentence (the guy probably wont get anywhere near that) and then its only a felony if the victim is at least 4 years younger than the perpetrator, whereas child rape (considered Aggravated Rape) is mandatory life without parole (should be the death penalty really...)
Suppose a person is wrongfully convicted and forcibly chemically castrated until he's proven later to be innocent. Can he have one stab at the judge who sentenced him with a needle in his butt of the same stuff? Or, to the government lawyers who maliciously prosecuted the individual? I can't imagine anyone who is later proven innocent taking that lying down.
Your reservation is understandable. However, chemical castration is reversible. In fact, one of my reservations about the process is it will lull us into a false sense of security...all you have to do to reverse the process is either A. Discontinue treatment or B. Continue treatment but inject testosterone. I support this law ONLY because the Supreme Court won't let us fry these people, but I still think if we don't fry them we need to put them away for life.
I think Castration is the best punishment for any type of violent criminals. A man's natural aggression comes from testosterone. If no testosterone is produces, then you hve no physical aggression. instead of heavy prson costs, just castrate them. Bobby Jindal is the man!!!
Well, I'm for the castration law, but we cannot substitute it for prison. As I've stated above, castration is reversible. We simply don't want to take the chance of them reversing the process and reoffending...prison is expensive, but it's there for a reason.
Now, I agree with your disdain for high prison costs, hense why I'd much rather fry the people.
Also, I forgot to add that there have been cases of castrated sex offenders still reoffending (example, using an object to attack the next victims) Testosterone is only one part of the equation for aggressive behavior, not the whole equation as history proves. I'm not arguing against castration, I'm simply saying it isn't the WHOLE solution. We still need prison (and in my opinion death) for murderers, rapists, and child molesters.
i will awnser your question about religion kills, go back a couple thousand years ago you got moses and the jews, they were slaves and being killed, you got the spanish inquision, salem whitch hunts, hitler, jim jones, david coresh waco, the chinese killing monks, and many many more just to many to list here
Hitler killed millions of a specific group.(Jews are an ethnic group not a religious group). He also killed homosexuals, Gypsies, political opponents, and last but not least about ten million(rough estimate)Russians and other Eastern Europeans. He was not a religious man nor was his regime. So tell me,are you stupid?
If Jews are not a religious group then I dont know what is... And you cant hide the fact that he killed 6 MILLION Jews, also known as the Holocaust. The holocaust was a GENOCIDE, which is defined as the deliberate and systematic destruction of a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group. Of course he didnt JUST kill them, there were other groups too, but dont ignore the Holocaust. Why you are trying to claim that Hitler is not connected to religion, i dont understand.
Maybe you should, look around, what has happened in America in the 50 years. We put more people in jail per capita than any other nation. Kill more through legalized murder. Allow same sex unions. I can go on and on with cases that are irrefutable, You know the answers. So tell us, do you really believe this book is obsolete?
hahaha so true motherfucker. But has it ever occured to you that we put so many ppl in jail because of the failing drug laws in our country? Not sure what you mean by legalized murder, but I'm gonna make a bold assumption and think you mean abortion. And same sex unions? God deal with your own life and stop fucking with other peoples you faggot.
You didn't answer the question directly. The only law that will directly affect drug abuse is in the very book you say does not warrant your respect or attention. Insofar as me dealing with my own life, I do. I'm simply stating my opinions, not to be confused with messing with other peoples live. You get confused quite a bit don't you?
the bible isn't going to fix anything. i saw on tv this guy talking about how we need "god's intervention" more than ever now. no we don't need god's intervention we need better politicians and better people. we need to educate our young on whats really going on here. the bible has never helped anything, more people have died from religion than from any other single cause in human history. god is so good, look at all the things carried out in his name.
And where do you suppose we should get these better politicians and people? Should we get them from the good people gettin place? That "more people have died from religion than from any other single cause", is both inaccurate and overused. Perhaps you can give us some real examples and not that generalization rationalization libtard rap.
I love how he does not care about votes or if what he says is not popular. He cares for what is right and what he is doing is sending a message saying "not welcome". I support him and if you don't want your junk cut off then don't rape little kids. If you have a problem with that then you have a problem in your head. There is NO gray area here. He is saying hands off!!!! I wish more officals were not politcians and chacing votes. My hat goes off to Gov. Jindal!
I say, tell the s court to go f itself and start killing these monsters anyway.I'll even move to and become a citizen of LA to help defend LAs right to self rule against the feds.
Id rather take these monsters out into the woods and set them down on a tree stump soked in lighter fluid.Tie hands behind back and leash him to a tree, drive 1 nail through each ball and 2 behind each ball in the scrote and 2 through the penis.Then cover his nailed genitals with shit(for infection).Then light it up!
if someone has their "dna evidence" inside a small childs rectum or vagina they should be killed. Castration is acceptable to me if killing them is off the table. But killing them is preferable in that they can never do more harm with a sex toy for instance.
Keep in mind, there should be irrefutable "physical" evidence pointing to the conviction of the accused before these punishments can be used.
Nope, Jay... I stand by my original statement. We need to fight against the Christian-talibanisation of America. It's too bad that it's come to this, but there's an unbroken chain of evil that eminates from Dixie - it should have been dealt with at the time of the Constitutional Convention, but sadly decent human beings caved the vileness of the South. If you prefer, how about "Wayward sisters depart in peace"? We don't need you - you've been more trouble than you're worth. Cya later...Not!
By their fruits, you shall know them. It's another tactic geared towards population control in the future. Let's see what those catholic priests' opinion will be...given the child molestation charges brought against them. Watch & Pray!
What a piece of shit. If McCain picks this guy, he should be ashamed of himself. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND??? This guy wants to cut off men's balls!!!! Doesn't anyone realize this? Child molesters should be jailed for a long time, but you want to cut off their balls? That's inhumane and insane.
What about a little girl who's had her vagina and uterus destroyed during a rape or a small boy whose sphinter was damaged and rendered incontinent from an anal attack? Screw the plight of the criminals' balls, what about the plight of child victims' vaginas and anuses, not to mention their psyches?
What about the person that was wrongly accused of molestation? The system is corrupt itself & now they want to do this. Many people in the system has been wrongfully accused of crimes. What if you were getting your nuts cut off? In that case y don't they just cut off the thieves hands. Rip out the teacher's vagina from having relations to with her student. Pluck out people eyes from peaking Toms. This is EVIL, CRUEL, & pure DEMONIC & SATANIC. People like u are enforcing martial law into place.
That is why it is optional the first time and if there is a second time, then how is the second conviction an accident? You have to be stupid to believe that.
You can't permit stuff like this and if you do something as cruel as a molester does you can't say, don't be cruel to me.
O god here we go...Ok then, just pluck out the peeping Tom's eyes, cut off the thief's hands and so forth...This shyt is getting too damn extreme with punishments..just stone the dern witch y don't u. Pretty soon they're going to start hanging and decapitating people again because it will be the law to do so. One thing leads to another...LOOK at the patriot act...look at how the constitution and bill of rights is non-existent.LOOOOK
Yes, but what if they are wrongly accused? Many accused molesters are not guilty and you're advocating cutting off the balls of innocent men. If one innocent man is castrated, that blood is on your hands and Jindal's hands. How you gonna explain that one?
I don't think castration will stop it. It might turn them into worse sickos, using dildos and such.. They should given CHRIST JESUS, then put to death. If they cannot repent. Even so, the children the victims, they need the love of GOD, because othewise, they'll grow up to be monsters, like the monsters that molested them. It is a sad terrible thing. You can't go off of witness testimony always. Parents lie, other situations involved such as young marriages to a virgin etc.. Pray.
Yes, I realize the seriousness of this situation. I live in LA. and I knew from the beginning that this guy was pure EVIL. People in the U.S. don't realize that this is leading to martial law (PERIOD).
I am sorry, but they don't have rights. They should have their balls cut off. I don't know about you, but I know I won't be convicted of this type of crime. So there should be nothing to worry about.
Typical ignorant attitude. No, I'm sure I won't ever be convicted of such a terrible crime, and it is terrible, but I'm sorry they DO have rights. Your human rights are not waved when you commit a crime. Maybe in Soviet Russia, bur I thought we lived in the United States. Also, there are hundreds, maybe thousands of innocent people in jail for crimes they did not commit. That means at least a few INNOCENT people will have their balls cut off. And that could be you my friend.
And to be frank (and this is coming from an open-minded gay boy raised in San Francisco), it's weird seeing a Middle Eastern politician with a Western accent. Would this be McCain's "idea" of being racially sensitive if they ran on the same ticket?
See you have it in your mind to do things to children. Keep the perversion up and you will be doing boys in no time. You already like the same sex, it is just the next step so you can admit it.
He is not middle eastern and he does not have an accent, so plug in and get the facts.
I wonder how would u feel if justice would not be in your favor and u are wrongfully convicted of molestation or sexual offense 1 or 2 times, and then they decide to cut ur balls off. I wonder if your opinion would differ?
he just says this man support chemical castration period!..but gave no reason as to why?....what a fag!..he supports Chemical castration on pedophiles who violate our kids....stupid...geez...be specific!...dun just use sound bite and half truths..
Comment removed
pmattoon 11 months ago
Jindal is being very reasonable, castration is way more humane than death penalty.
Sasukekillsitachi 1 year ago
kill em all and castrate em first bust their shit and fuck em up
youngmiyn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This wholly mess is falling around the ankles of these proponents of the Death Penalty when we think destroying someones life over sex is the right things too do? This wasteful conduct will not be tolerated anymore with such flimsy unjust and worthless reasoning. Take the S.O. laws and push them out with the trash that came up with this Tom foolery. It cant be justified & what is being done will not exist any more for sex reasons. Can't kill people for sex get outa politics wishful murders.
Keither9 2 years ago
Fidel Castrata
3star2nr 2 years ago
If you care to know how much it COSTS to put a repeat sex offender into a state hospital it varies from $160,000 - $70,000 (160K - 70K). To house a prisoner - about $20,000/year.
Laws should be re-written so that a second offense = LIFE with NO PAROLE.
First sentence should be at least 20-years.
LETS GET THIS CORRECT:
CHEMICAL CASTRATION = injections lasting 2-weeks / Lupron implant lasts up to 6-months (titanium).
SURGICAL CASTRATION (not "physical castration") is what it is.
four4vizslas 2 years ago
It is undetermined if Lupron is reversable. It is speculated that after 3 years it may not be.
chargedconvicted 2 years ago
No wonder Jindal loves "My Beautiful Launderette" & That scene.
Tmetrvlr 2 years ago
not even constitutional. i applaud his intentions, but jindal is an idiot.
venivecivedi 2 years ago
@venivecivedi Well then, what exactly should we do?????????
It's easy for many lawmakers to say whatever is constitutional.
However, when you ask them what will be the constitutional approach, everybody says counseling.
Jeez, I guess counseling will really work LOL
ttiiyy 1 year ago
Bobby Jindal for president 2012. He is completely right these sick monsters don't deserve to be treated as humans. They should be tortured in the most painful way possible and be executed by burning them alive. SHAME on the faggot ass liberal judges who voted against this I hope someone in their family gets raped so they know how it feels.
smithbrain 2 years ago
Dude, much as I agree with your sentiments, thats fucked up. You should never wish for a man's family members to be raped to teach him a lesson because its not their fault their husband/father/whatever is a moron. You're wishing rape on an innocent person to teach the justice a lesson. The justice is guilty...their wife/child is NOT. I only hope you're kidding here.
DarthSociopath 2 years ago
DarthSociopath thank you for not using profanity in your comments. I totally agree with you I was wrong. I don't wish rape on any good person. I just hope that GOD burns the judges that voted no in this case in the 7th layer of hell for eternity. Thank you for making me realise my mistake. Take care
smithbrain 2 years ago
It's cool man, no problem. And yeah, it's sickening what the justices did here. Oh, and as a Louisianaian, I TOTALLY agree: Jindal 2012!!!
DarthSociopath 2 years ago
And let me be clear: I believe in the death penalty for ALL rapes and ALL child molestations. I think child rapists should be executed painfully, brutally, and publically. Frankly, I wouldn't criticize you too sharply if you wished something like that on the justices themselves. But their wives and children are not at fault for their stupidity. If you are serious about wishing rape on their families, you're just as bad as the child rapists.
DarthSociopath 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
His mom came over while she was expecting to give birth in the U.S. he's another citizenship jackpot baby can you guess who paid for it.(LOL) Piyush Jindal is a joke and a puppet He's another "Rapepublican" freak show.You have a City still messed up from Hurricane Katrina and he's playing politics like Condoleezza Rice when her and "W" Dumb Ass turned down help from other countries during the hurricane because they didn't want anyone to see that they didn't have their stuff together.
ivedigga 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Piyush Jindal is a joke and a puppet and yes that's his real name. He's another "Rapepublican" freak show.You have a City still very fucked up from Hurricane Katrina and he's play politics like Condoleezza Rice when her and "W" Dumb Ass turned down help from other countries during the hurricane because they did'nt want anyone to see that they did not have their shit wasn't together.
ivedigga 2 years ago
Quick comments. I think child rapists are worse than murderers because they leave children tramatized and many of the children harmed end up doing horrible things in their future because of these tramatization. My wife and I have taken in a fifteen year old who was abused as a child and now beats the crap out of other kids and is irrational.
She wants the absolute worst done to her rapist. However, she has severe anger issues. Civil solutions are the true answer, NOT CASTRATION!
ScotterS69 2 years ago
I actually like this idea better than the Death Penalty. Proud to be from your state, Governor!
canatherine 3 years ago
lol. wish i could be there. im in liberal minnesota. :/
mnredryder1 2 years ago
Go Jindal Go! Here Gov Jindal says he does not care about the popularity because its right. Only a liberal can feel bad for a child molester. A molester is raping kids and people look at the offender as the victim. I would support this bill 100%. You got nothing to worry about if you don't rape kids, but I guess people that are against this is a dumb liberal. Child molesters deserve to be burned alive and then be put out before they die so they can live like a freak.
cartmanfan0316 3 years ago 2
Without his nuts, a sex offender is physically much weaker as doesn't produce testosterone, and therefore loses a lot of muscle. This a is a great bill. So what if castration is cruel and usual. What the rapist did to his victim is cruel and unusual. Gotta commend Bobby Jindal!!! Great work!!
Uppercut416 3 years ago 2
Not to mention the fact that without testicles, he can't produce the necessary hormones to maintain an erection. It renders him impotent, and he can never rape again. You're right, castration is a very fitting punishment for this very brutal crime.
LastTrueLiberal 3 years ago
He can never rape again with his penis. He CAN rape again with an object. It's happened before, it will happen again. Unless we lock them up for life as well as castrate them.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Now lets say we opt for physical castration. But that doesn't ensure safety either. Castrated rapists can (and do) reoffend using objects to penetrate the victim (especially since it's often about power/control, not sex per se) And IMAGINE how pissed off a nut-less rapist will be and how much he will take it out on his next victim. Even without his balls, a sex offender is still dangerous. Life sentences are expensive, but with no death penalty, even with castration we don't have a choice.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
"And IMAGINE how pissed off a nut-less rapist.." The hormones that govern male anger are produced by the testes.
LastTrueLiberal 3 years ago
Well, testosterone influences male anger...but its not the only factor otherwise female anger would be inexplicable (they have a little testosterone, but not much, no where near male levels and there have certainly been no shortage of very violent females.) A man without his nuts is still dangerous and can still hurt people much like a women who never had nuts can.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
True, but still, getting your nuts cut off is a pretty powerful deterant.
Atreus21 2 years ago
Agreed, I'm just saying keep them in prison for life as well as castrate them. The life sentence is expensive, but we can't put a dollar figure on protecting children.
EmperorDarren 2 years ago
You a scumbag! You say ok to cut? Is you? No the problem is tostesterone is inside body! Sexual offenders will still have that even if castration. Sexual offenders the problem is for they need feel powerful, not cut off dicks, is no help for the problem
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
1. Dude, you're fucking illiterate...PLEASE gain a grasp of proper grammar and semantics before you post here...your idiocy disgusts me.
2. I have REPEATEDLY said here that I believe castration must be used in conjunction with either life WITHOUT parole or the death penalty (which I prefer) to be effective.
3. (again) In the name of all things holy, please tell me that you are either drunk or 13 years old...otherwise your grammatical structure is just too sad to excuse!
EmperorDarren 2 years ago
EmperorDarren, you see no is everyone is born is in english speaking country!
Why it do that for? See is the USA ppl make a problem. Not me
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
Is the reason I say Sex Offenders castration is not help for the probem!!!!
Sex offenders is tostesterone make person do like that! They need the power!
Castration is not for benefit!
You think josef fritzl is ok?
Why is not good for the daughter is saD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
Dude, I get it and I halfway apologize...I looked at your profile after you posted and saw you were from Finland. But it IS a problem when you try to comment on MY country's politics and I can't even understand what you are saying!
EmperorDarren 2 years ago
You see is the problem. I like comment for the videos and some ppl for the USA make a problem!
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
To respond to your comment on my page, NO, I do NOT want my dick cut off. But...I DON'T RAPE LITTLE CHILDREN! What do YOU think should be done with child rapists dude? I think they should be executed...but if we cannot execute them, I think they should be put in prison for life with NO chance of parole. What do YOU think?
EmperorDarren 2 years ago
Yes, you see the ppl is sex offenders they're sick fucks ! It's castration ppl make it sound that helps solve the problem! Noooo it doesn't help, I say these criminals they need to stay away for the public is safe and no problem! I make a suggest that they go inside the prison and after is sentence is finish, thye need to go to mental hospitals. Stay away for people safe! They sick scumb bags
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
You know Josef Fritzl? He's sick he's not human normal! he's raping for the daughter for 24 years!!!! She's in the basement lock up no help!
Josef is a evil sick fuck
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
Yes I know Josef Fritzl...I believe he should be EXECUTED! What do YOU think should be done to him>
EmperorDarren 2 years ago
I wanna kill and toture Josef Fritzl brutal! What Fritzl is done are disgusting very terrible! USA is too soft for criminals!!! Is the reasoning for they comit the crimes many times!!! These scumbags thinks they will get away with that!!! See here not make too much crime. Is very strcit
Here is forced for the criminlas to learn skills while inside in the prison!! So they go out and not come back!!
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
Is my say that USA is thinking too much of the rights of the criminlas!! What happens when the criminals are aoutside the prison? They not know nothing!!! Ok go kill, rape, robb whatever agian!! USA ppl is pay for the offenders to go prison!! Taxes pay for them! I think ppl for the USA get more angry with goverment of USA
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
dude what do you actually mean can you please explain to me in more details.
smithbrain 2 years ago
I say for men who rape,,, they go prison and go out of prison! The dick cut off not help the problem!! I say they go to prison and when come out they need to live in mental hospital forever... Is these men very terrible,, no change,, is shit ppl
Streets no safe if they out
Excuse my english not very nice
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
Bobby Jindal is a good man, and I'm proud to have him as my governor. I support the castration law. THAT SAID, it's extremely dangerous to think castration can take the place of a life sentence for a child rapist. Allow me to explain why: Chemical castration can be reversed in several ways. The offender can abscond from his parole officer and thus no longer take the shots, or can take the shots but also shoot up testosterone to reverse the effects.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago 2
How can we continue funding prisons which are becoming unpopular on both the right and left wings of politics. Dems oppose them due to the high number of minorities and Republicans oppose it due to the extra tax burden. The proposal for more prisons will likely be a dead end with no results. Supreme Court has ruled against a death penalty. You can't let these people go without at least a substantial penalty. So this seems to be a the only middle ground which may be at least somewhat effective
LatinoIndiano 3 years ago
Politics is VERY often a "damned if you do, damned if you dont" game. Just because prisons are unpopular doesn't mean we cut back on them. Simply put, if we let child rapists out, we're taking an unjustifiable risk with our kids, even with castration. This is why the LA law imposes castration in ADDITION to prison, NOT instead of it. And under LA law, child rape carries MANDATORY LWOP. My point is: prisons are expensive...this sucks...but there is no alternative if we care about our children.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Great point, Emperor Darren!
LatinoIndiano 3 years ago
Thanks man...I appreciate it. Now, as to cost I think we put FAR too many nonviolent offenders in jail (druggies for example) We can cut a LOT of prison costs if we take alternative routes with them. This will allow us to save space for the true predators who need to be there. The cost sucks I know but a child's innocence is worth more than any tax burden.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Of course there is nothing wrong with putting violent criminals which pose a danger to other people behind bars, but nonviolent people "guilty" of victimless crimes ought not be kidnapped for exercising their liberties. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the entire world. We need less prisons, not more. If we just let the stoners go, it will be a huge victory for individual liberty, we can cut back on prisons, and tax money will be saved.
LastTrueLiberal 3 years ago
Here's a novel idea, let nonviolent criminals who pose no danger to society free! A huge percentage of prisoners are "guilty" of victimless nonviolent crimes. Letting the potheads free will lessen the tax burden and be a huge victory for individual liberty.
LastTrueLiberal 3 years ago
I actually agree with you there. They take up valuable real estate in prisons. The room can better be spent on predators who need to be there.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Yes, they do take up valuable prison real estate, but the larger issue here is a moral one. To lock a nonviolent person up for making bad personal decisions is totally contrary to the principle of indvidiual liberty. It's none of your business whether I use recreational drugs other than alcohol or not. Now if the individual using drugs begins to steal or hold up convenient stores in order to finance his personal decision, then of course he should go to prison. Otherwise, it is no one's business.
LastTrueLiberal 3 years ago
Well put! Locking up potheads is both counterproductive and morally questionable. I assume you don't have any problems with locking up murderers, rapists, and child molesters for life?
By the way, Merry Christmas and thanks for your well thought out comments.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
So you think josef fritzl is ok?
you one sick person evil scumbag
Greatlifeis 2 years ago
My base instincts want to agree with Gov. Jindal here because I think these sick monsters deserve severe punishment and I could also see cases where the death penalty could be justifiable. But is it right to act on our base instincts here? I don't think we should allow our personal disgust of these crimes lead us to enact barbaric and cruel punishments on human beings. Honestly I think this is a case by case situation but no doubt its a tough issue with no real right or wrong answer.
Saadfeld 3 years ago
True, Saadfeld. Personally, I think it is a perfectly appropriate punishment for child sex predators. They deserve to lose the function and hormones which makes them most dangerous to society. That way they can't rape any other innocent children.
LatinoIndiano 3 years ago
I completely respect your opinion LatinoIndiano. And when it comes down to it, I agree with you to a certain extent because the safety of innocent children should be the first concern in rulings like this. But it still leaves me with concern that we would be walking a fine moral line, bordering on cruel/extreme punishment. Could a punishment like this create a precedent for others like it? When do we start flirting with the idea of simply lobotomizing violent criminals? Its a complicated issue.
Saadfeld 3 years ago
It is quite complicated and you are right about precedents. But it's either that or a life sentence where you set up prisons with staff that cost millions if not billions to run and then see that predator quite probably murdered behind bars by other inmates after they've learned about his crime. Since the death sentence has been ruled out, those are the only two plausible scenarios. I believe that even most criminals would choose at least some freedom over a life sentence that may mean death.
LatinoIndiano 3 years ago
Well what a criminal would choose is pretty irrelevant anyway, its not their choice to make. But I do understand what you're saying. I've actually been a pretty firm believer that life sentences are generally better punishments than the death penalty. Now obviously some crimes are so heinous that leaving the criminal alive is simply not justifiable, but often times I think life imprisonment is the ultimate punishment for any human being.
Saadfeld 3 years ago
Louisiana is marching towards stone age.
cdry7ue 3 years ago
Louisiana is finally doing what it takes to keep it's most vulnarable residents safe. Fuck child predators, I wish them hell on earth. Or maybe you think the only crime worth the death penalty is growing inside a mother that doesn't want you?
pimpdalyrical 3 years ago
Exactly right pimpdalyrical...no disrespect to the orginal commenter, but what do you mean "stone age?" Our governor is doing all he can to protect innocent children. I do have some reservations about the castration thing (which I've expressed in other posts)but the rights of child molesters do NOT factor in. Which is more valuable: the innocence of children or the rights of some rapist/child molester?
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Also, castration of violent criminals isn't a bad idea either. First off it reduces their aggressie behavior considerably. Secondly, they are not fit too have any offsprings, meaning they won't make good parents and their children will become exactly the same. Castration is the best punishment for sex offendes and violent criminals.
Uppercut416 3 years ago 5
@Uppercut416 Amen!
ttiiyy 1 year ago
Generally, I am socially liberal. However, the moral of this story is this : don't fuck little kids. I think we can all agree with that. Watch Lousiana have the lowest number of incidents of ANY state during this bill's 1st 365 days in effect
krentistthedentist 3 years ago 7
It's easier said than done in the case of the offenders. No, I'm NOT defending their actions at all(you and some of the people who commented here are smart enough to figure that out, I'm pointing it out to the idiots on here who don't do so because it involves thinking), I'm saying that most of them either are mentally ill or have at one point been victims of these crimes themselves as youngsters.
flawedbeauty82 3 years ago
@krentistthedentist Amen!
ttiiyy 1 year ago
I am worried about statutory rape. i.e. . If a male high school senior sleeps with a high school freshman girl and gets caught, that boy will be turned into a eunuch from this chemical the government gives him?
ned262626 3 years ago
I understand your reservations, but let me explain how the LA law actually works. It only allows castration for aggravated rape, forcible rape, second degree sexual battery, aggravated incest, molestation of a child under 13, and aggravated crime against nature. The scenerio of an 18 year old sleeping with a 14 year old is called under LA law "Felony Carnal Knowledge of a Juvenille" and while a felony, is NOT covered by the castration law. The law reserves castration for TRUE predators.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Satutory rape is not child rape, they are two different crimes. Funny how the liberals opposed the splitting of those hairs too.
pimpdalyrical 3 years ago
Exactly right...many people don't realize it, but the law does differentiate between a guy who sleeps with his underage girlfriend and a monster who rapes a kid. Under LA law, Felony Carnal Knowledge carries a maximum 10 year sentence (the guy probably wont get anywhere near that) and then its only a felony if the victim is at least 4 years younger than the perpetrator, whereas child rape (considered Aggravated Rape) is mandatory life without parole (should be the death penalty really...)
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Suppose a person is wrongfully convicted and forcibly chemically castrated until he's proven later to be innocent. Can he have one stab at the judge who sentenced him with a needle in his butt of the same stuff? Or, to the government lawyers who maliciously prosecuted the individual? I can't imagine anyone who is later proven innocent taking that lying down.
triumphanator 3 years ago
Your reservation is understandable. However, chemical castration is reversible. In fact, one of my reservations about the process is it will lull us into a false sense of security...all you have to do to reverse the process is either A. Discontinue treatment or B. Continue treatment but inject testosterone. I support this law ONLY because the Supreme Court won't let us fry these people, but I still think if we don't fry them we need to put them away for life.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago 3
who is on the side of a rapist? Are there any more rape promotors? He did his duty. Welldone Bobby!!!
saketponmana 3 years ago 4
I think Castration is the best punishment for any type of violent criminals. A man's natural aggression comes from testosterone. If no testosterone is produces, then you hve no physical aggression. instead of heavy prson costs, just castrate them. Bobby Jindal is the man!!!
Uppercut416 3 years ago 2
Well, I'm for the castration law, but we cannot substitute it for prison. As I've stated above, castration is reversible. We simply don't want to take the chance of them reversing the process and reoffending...prison is expensive, but it's there for a reason.
Now, I agree with your disdain for high prison costs, hense why I'd much rather fry the people.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
Also, I forgot to add that there have been cases of castrated sex offenders still reoffending (example, using an object to attack the next victims) Testosterone is only one part of the equation for aggressive behavior, not the whole equation as history proves. I'm not arguing against castration, I'm simply saying it isn't the WHOLE solution. We still need prison (and in my opinion death) for murderers, rapists, and child molesters.
EmperorDarren 3 years ago
feminazi
krentistthedentist 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i am sooooo very sad to say that he is my governor.
holocaustik 3 years ago
i will awnser your question about religion kills, go back a couple thousand years ago you got moses and the jews, they were slaves and being killed, you got the spanish inquision, salem whitch hunts, hitler, jim jones, david coresh waco, the chinese killing monks, and many many more just to many to list here
jetbtkng 3 years ago
Hitler? How is Hitler and any religion connected in any way? They are not.
jetroavery08 3 years ago
What are you stupid? Hitler killed thousands of a specific group of people. A specific RELIGION. Thats how they're connected.
theWPO 3 years ago
Hitler killed millions of a specific group.(Jews are an ethnic group not a religious group). He also killed homosexuals, Gypsies, political opponents, and last but not least about ten million(rough estimate)Russians and other Eastern Europeans. He was not a religious man nor was his regime. So tell me,are you stupid?
jetroavery08 3 years ago
If Jews are not a religious group then I dont know what is... And you cant hide the fact that he killed 6 MILLION Jews, also known as the Holocaust. The holocaust was a GENOCIDE, which is defined as the deliberate and systematic destruction of a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group. Of course he didnt JUST kill them, there were other groups too, but dont ignore the Holocaust. Why you are trying to claim that Hitler is not connected to religion, i dont understand.
theWPO 3 years ago
umm jews are an ethnic group not a religious group and jews werent the only ones killed
holocaustik 3 years ago
You are both wrong, but also both right. Being "Jewish" is both an ethnic and a religious group.
*shrugs*
It's splitting hairs, though.
DangerousBoy15 3 years ago
This country could use a few less bible thumpers like Jindal, who don't seem to realize we're not living in bible times.
badtown88 3 years ago
Bible times? What does that mean. Is the bible outdated, old news?
jetroavery08 3 years ago
Uhhhhhhhhhhh hmmmmmmmmmm let me think. YES. usually when a book it 2000 years old we don't pay much attention to it.
badtown88 3 years ago
Maybe you should, look around, what has happened in America in the 50 years. We put more people in jail per capita than any other nation. Kill more through legalized murder. Allow same sex unions. I can go on and on with cases that are irrefutable, You know the answers. So tell us, do you really believe this book is obsolete?
jetroavery08 3 years ago
hahaha so true motherfucker. But has it ever occured to you that we put so many ppl in jail because of the failing drug laws in our country? Not sure what you mean by legalized murder, but I'm gonna make a bold assumption and think you mean abortion. And same sex unions? God deal with your own life and stop fucking with other peoples you faggot.
badtown88 3 years ago
You didn't answer the question directly. The only law that will directly affect drug abuse is in the very book you say does not warrant your respect or attention. Insofar as me dealing with my own life, I do. I'm simply stating my opinions, not to be confused with messing with other peoples live. You get confused quite a bit don't you?
jetroavery08 3 years ago
dude it's people like you that elected george bush into office.
bosscitywhitey 3 years ago
Well, there it is, what a profound statement. Do you suppose I should have supported Kerry or Gorlioni? Do you have a point or just simple rhetoric?
jetroavery08 3 years ago
the bible isn't going to fix anything. i saw on tv this guy talking about how we need "god's intervention" more than ever now. no we don't need god's intervention we need better politicians and better people. we need to educate our young on whats really going on here. the bible has never helped anything, more people have died from religion than from any other single cause in human history. god is so good, look at all the things carried out in his name.
bosscitywhitey 3 years ago
And where do you suppose we should get these better politicians and people? Should we get them from the good people gettin place? That "more people have died from religion than from any other single cause", is both inaccurate and overused. Perhaps you can give us some real examples and not that generalization rationalization libtard rap.
jetroavery08 3 years ago
If this man becomes vice president, McCain will have comepletely sold out any principles he once had.
badtown88 3 years ago
I love how he does not care about votes or if what he says is not popular. He cares for what is right and what he is doing is sending a message saying "not welcome". I support him and if you don't want your junk cut off then don't rape little kids. If you have a problem with that then you have a problem in your head. There is NO gray area here. He is saying hands off!!!! I wish more officals were not politcians and chacing votes. My hat goes off to Gov. Jindal!
sirvan80 3 years ago
He wont leave the woods alive. He'll either die of fire or gangreen of the crotch.
scotta999 3 years ago
I say, tell the s court to go f itself and start killing these monsters anyway.I'll even move to and become a citizen of LA to help defend LAs right to self rule against the feds.
Id rather take these monsters out into the woods and set them down on a tree stump soked in lighter fluid.Tie hands behind back and leash him to a tree, drive 1 nail through each ball and 2 behind each ball in the scrote and 2 through the penis.Then cover his nailed genitals with shit(for infection).Then light it up!
scotta999 3 years ago
if someone has their "dna evidence" inside a small childs rectum or vagina they should be killed. Castration is acceptable to me if killing them is off the table. But killing them is preferable in that they can never do more harm with a sex toy for instance.
Keep in mind, there should be irrefutable "physical" evidence pointing to the conviction of the accused before these punishments can be used.
scotta999 3 years ago
Castrate Southerners! So many,many problems will be solved!!!
zdarkstar20001 3 years ago
That is pretty offensive, Nancyboy. You should focus on the shortcomings of this law... i.e. it would be ineffective against nullos such as yourself.
jayreynolds1 3 years ago
Nope, Jay... I stand by my original statement. We need to fight against the Christian-talibanisation of America. It's too bad that it's come to this, but there's an unbroken chain of evil that eminates from Dixie - it should have been dealt with at the time of the Constitutional Convention, but sadly decent human beings caved the vileness of the South. If you prefer, how about "Wayward sisters depart in peace"? We don't need you - you've been more trouble than you're worth. Cya later...Not!
zdarkstar20001 3 years ago
Let's hear it for Gov Jindal, if you can't kill these scum, take their ability to procreate. I hope Mcclame chooses him for running mate.
IamInfidel 3 years ago
By their fruits, you shall know them. It's another tactic geared towards population control in the future. Let's see what those catholic priests' opinion will be...given the child molestation charges brought against them. Watch & Pray!
DCJusticeDC 3 years ago
Also, not all molestation victims,
grow up to become molesters,
or porn stars.
Love people, don't hurt people.
ISRAELITECHURCH 3 years ago
What a piece of shit. If McCain picks this guy, he should be ashamed of himself. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND??? This guy wants to cut off men's balls!!!! Doesn't anyone realize this? Child molesters should be jailed for a long time, but you want to cut off their balls? That's inhumane and insane.
badtown88 3 years ago
What about a little girl who's had her vagina and uterus destroyed during a rape or a small boy whose sphinter was damaged and rendered incontinent from an anal attack? Screw the plight of the criminals' balls, what about the plight of child victims' vaginas and anuses, not to mention their psyches?
7027A 3 years ago 3
What about the person that was wrongly accused of molestation? The system is corrupt itself & now they want to do this. Many people in the system has been wrongfully accused of crimes. What if you were getting your nuts cut off? In that case y don't they just cut off the thieves hands. Rip out the teacher's vagina from having relations to with her student. Pluck out people eyes from peaking Toms. This is EVIL, CRUEL, & pure DEMONIC & SATANIC. People like u are enforcing martial law into place.
fearNotone 3 years ago
That is why it is optional the first time and if there is a second time, then how is the second conviction an accident? You have to be stupid to believe that.
You can't permit stuff like this and if you do something as cruel as a molester does you can't say, don't be cruel to me.
sirvan80 3 years ago
O god here we go...Ok then, just pluck out the peeping Tom's eyes, cut off the thief's hands and so forth...This shyt is getting too damn extreme with punishments..just stone the dern witch y don't u. Pretty soon they're going to start hanging and decapitating people again because it will be the law to do so. One thing leads to another...LOOK at the patriot act...look at how the constitution and bill of rights is non-existent.LOOOOK
fearNotone 3 years ago
Yes, but what if they are wrongly accused? Many accused molesters are not guilty and you're advocating cutting off the balls of innocent men. If one innocent man is castrated, that blood is on your hands and Jindal's hands. How you gonna explain that one?
badtown88 3 years ago
ISRAELITECHURCH 3 years ago
Yes, I realize the seriousness of this situation. I live in LA. and I knew from the beginning that this guy was pure EVIL. People in the U.S. don't realize that this is leading to martial law (PERIOD).
fearNotone 3 years ago
I am sorry, but they don't have rights. They should have their balls cut off. I don't know about you, but I know I won't be convicted of this type of crime. So there should be nothing to worry about.
sirvan80 3 years ago
Typical ignorant attitude. No, I'm sure I won't ever be convicted of such a terrible crime, and it is terrible, but I'm sorry they DO have rights. Your human rights are not waved when you commit a crime. Maybe in Soviet Russia, bur I thought we lived in the United States. Also, there are hundreds, maybe thousands of innocent people in jail for crimes they did not commit. That means at least a few INNOCENT people will have their balls cut off. And that could be you my friend.
badtown88 3 years ago
This guy is a JOKE!
Absolutely riDICKulous.
And to be frank (and this is coming from an open-minded gay boy raised in San Francisco), it's weird seeing a Middle Eastern politician with a Western accent. Would this be McCain's "idea" of being racially sensitive if they ran on the same ticket?
NYCGMC 3 years ago
See you have it in your mind to do things to children. Keep the perversion up and you will be doing boys in no time. You already like the same sex, it is just the next step so you can admit it.
He is not middle eastern and he does not have an accent, so plug in and get the facts.
sirvan80 3 years ago
He is of Indian descent which is in the East.
fearNotone 3 years ago
I wonder how would u feel if justice would not be in your favor and u are wrongfully convicted of molestation or sexual offense 1 or 2 times, and then they decide to cut ur balls off. I wonder if your opinion would differ?
fearNotone 3 years ago
Wrongly convicted? You're reaching
Ahh another Libtard
jetroavery08 3 years ago
hes not middle eastern, hes indian.
figures a fag (and probable pedo) would be against this type of punishment. hopefully you end up strapped to a fence like matthew shepard.
bremenlegation 3 years ago
he just says this man support chemical castration period!..but gave no reason as to why?....what a fag!..he supports Chemical castration on pedophiles who violate our kids....stupid...geez...be specific!...dun just use sound bite and half truths..
khuctinh 3 years ago
This is great...
"I thought their job was to interpret the Constitution, not take opinion polls"
Good job!
psychomichael 3 years ago