Polar Bear science states that Polar Bears are threatened. Its not based on whether their population is increasing or decreasing now, its bases on their numbers relative to a specific time ago. Sure they are increasing now because they are protected.
You obviously hate science and are hypocritically using bad science to justify your ignorant views.
polar bears have been increasing since the 1950ies when we started to count them. Again look at a longer time scale there is nothing unusal about climate today. Nothing unusal about storms or anything
Thanks for your views RocketmanF4. I'm sure you love your FoxNews, Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck. You believe in God, guns and gold. You hate women, drugs and peace. You are forgiven for your sin if you attend church regularly. You and your friends are going to heaven and everyone else is going to hell.
There you go like a AGW supporter attacking anyone who dares to not follow you. Please tell me what specific time you are refering to when you said "Its not based on whether their population is increasing or decreasing now, its bases on their numbers relative to a specific time ago"
Why is the "threatened" only in the future not now, as now they are growing in number. You should look at climate temps going back before 1850 and you will see there is nothing unusal about what is happening with temp now.
RocketManF4 Could the Eskimo reporting be biased? Could all the Eskimo reporting be biased? Yes of course. And they live near the polar bears so they will see them all the time. And that crap about Environmentalists using the Polar Bear as a cute animal symbol is all lies. They want to hunt bears so they are biased.
Learn some climate science or should I teach you? The planet is heating up!
So I'm to believe you and not believe climate scientists because you have some climate data. How much climate science do you know? Can you tell me the first five factors in climate change in order? I doubt it. Can you explain why CO2 trails temp in some cases (the reverse order)? I doubt it. Can you understand why temp data can be used to undermine climate change?
First the US and Canada govt. both have research and graphs that prove that polar bears are incresing in numbers. So in your world co2 trailing temp by a average of 800 years every time in the past is "the reverse order" and its still that way once you look up temp records going back to the ice age, NOTHING unusal about todays climate
do you understand there are over 11,000,000 species on this planet, do you only care about this cute one? And why is it threatened when in the real world they are doing fine?
Oh so the people who eat bears are saying scientists are wrong!? rofl
So more bears are coming into town, big whoop. If the place they normally hunt is MELTING AWAY then of course they'll find other places to hunt.
This is like listening to a fat dutchman say the dodo bird is flourishing as he's sucking meat off a bone. I always thought Eskimo people were wise for some reason. They're just the hicks of the world's refrigerator.
Get your racists head out of your ass. The fact that the bear increases are bad news for the oil companies that are pushing the global warming B.S. is no reason for you to become a hater.
Yes, you heard me right.. The global warming B.S. is being funded by Shell and B.P., not Academia. It's so they can control energy through "carbon trading" after peak oil. Gore and Ken Lay worked it out. A former Enron lawyer quit when they told him they wanted him to help with it and spilled his beans.
I believe this is a problem if the numbers are declining. If they are not as the Inuit say. Then they do have every right to hunt these animals. The deciding factor here is clearly the actual truth behind the decline. Hunting when done with care and organizational group IE Ministry of Natural Resources, is a fundamental piece of the conservation of animals. Hunting provides direct taxation funding for conservation by way of tags and license fees. As long as the population is monitored.
The polar bear is awesome. They look so peaceful and tame. Lets do everything we can to stop their decline. I can't believe these morons are shooting them. How can these idiots sleep at night. Watching the shooting makes me sick. How about I shoot you in the head RETARD? I'd rather you be extinct than the these amazing creatures.
They're using rubber bullets to scare them away so people don't get mauled. If they didn't leave piles of garbage laying about maybe they'd loose interest? I get along fine with critters & deer in my yard, up close even. We support each other. The key is 'balance' without fear. No need to shoot anything. Even my garden is safe, plenty to share due to propagating bio diversity.
at 0:55 they show a guy shooting a gun and then a dead bear. They have put two unrelated clips together to make it look they are killing the bears. Thanks for reply, I feel better knowing the bears arent being killed.
You are so wrong "They look so peaceful and tame" they only look that way because they are cute, but in real life they are killing machines. How do you sleep at night after eating chicken, beef or pigs?
I said they *look* peaceful and tame. Of course they are killing machines. They are designed to catch and eat ringed seals and bearded seals. They live on meat and sleep well at night.
Yeah I eat all kinds of meat just like the polar bear. Get over it.
Again you are wrong there are more polar bears now than 20 years ago. So in your world it's ok to eat meat as long as it comes pre wrapped in plastic but not the native people who hunt for there meat?
Why do you think they are threatened? And say they are so what, what will happen when they are all gone? You may have a shortage of cute animals to care about?
That old guy might be seeing the same polar bear 300 times. This is bad reporting. Tag some bears, do some population studies. This is media murder. Why undermine science? The studies show the bears are in decline.
yea, i hate these anti-science morons that just "k now" better than the smartest brightest people of our time, who work round the clock on these problems. =\
Man is the greatest threat to all other animal species on this planet. Yep people get mad when they have animals in their yard or on their properties. Do not blame the animals they been there. Blame man and continuing occupation of land invading their habitats.
CLIMATEGATE ends the global warming scam. Now AGW trolls can only shoot off their mouths while their pants are draped around their ankles because CLIMATEGATE is not going away.
Of Course they're seeing more bears, they have less ice to live on, so naturally they have to migrate south into inhabited areas. This is %¤%&#%¤ basic stuff...
1:18 - not a very natural place for them to be (on land!).
we (people) are the reason for any decline in animals, trees, food, or any other natural process in which things are used to be in the norm. and because of the WE are the only ones to blame when there is a decline. not bacuse of warm weather. if it was weather, there would be nmore like a 30 degree change willing to introduce this vid, not 2 degrees at most. these scientists are getting paid by theives and need to be stopped; but they won't.
Amateur debunkers carry no weight in academia and have no relevance in the discussion of climate change in the scientific community Since other scientists did not debunk a formal presentation on the topic of climate change, why would an amateur think that they could? Amateurish debunking approach is nothing more than a type argumentative arrogance that attracts others and it gives the debunker a sense of power Debunking sites are most definitely NOT scientific debate and critical inquiry.
since some are stupid let me explain in other terms if 1 million people said they saw an extraterrestrial you know an Alien only 1 person needs to be correct to make it true. so 100% of scientists must be all liars to make this untrue. now flip what I said around if 999,999 people say its true we don't question majority even if it only takes 1 person to be correct. confused yet, I'm not disputing there claims I'm saying people are retarded if they don't think humans are effecting our planet
Inuits would know, in my area the scientists declared a wolf species extinct back in the 80's when there was still a live population. After 30 years of reports by locals about mountain lions which science said was extinct in my state, it was announced that they had returned to our region, only because someone shot one and carcasses were being found along the roadside because of vehicular strikes. Science has a long way to go IMHO.
Seriously people, you rather Listen to a Scientist? Or just a random joe. People criticize Scientist to much, when in fact its because of Science and Research that things advance in Technology, Knowledge, and Medicine.
Yea Global Warming is a hoax, I mean all that CO2 we are realizing doesn't matter it just disappears and we don't have to worry about it. Boy did I just sound ignorant|?
Some people dont get that at some point when you break the food chain, it will eventually affect humans. God made all this according to some of you, so why not value and respect the earth you were given ?
You're counting the same bear more than once idiot. Bears are just hanging out around humans more than before, they know they can get easy food by digging through trash. Thus why you're seeing them more often..
Leave it to Canadian pansies to have their national media run a 3-minute story on something that's of no concern to people other than animal rights folks, animal lovers and global warming alarmists (like 5% of the population).
Has there ever been a truly vibrant, thriving polar bear community ANYWHERE with thousands if not 10s of thousands?? Esp. in recent human history. So who cares if there's a few less. I mean, even from an ecological standpoint, if polar bears were to go extinct, why would it matter? They don't contribute to the system. They just run around, mate, sleep, hibernate and find food. they live in places so cold it's hardly possible to really affect anything.
How is this even a debate? Doesn't the U.S. gov't alone have enough money and technology to monitor all the polar bears at both poles and see whether or not this is true?? Are the people who monitor these cameras asleep at the wheel?
Man is so cruel. First, he destroys the polar bears' habitat so that they can't hunt food for themselves and then he shoots them when they resort to scavenging garbage dumps to feed their hunger. God, we are one, sick, heartless species, huh? We want the whole damn world for just ourselves and to hell with any other fellow passengers on this big, blue marble known as Earth.
Their scavenging the dumps because their population is to great. Its what happens in areas where population growth has reached its limits.. ever hear of a cougar eating a neighbors cat off its door step? Man is to blame, but at the same time you've got to understand wildlife conservation.. and hunting for these animals is part of conserving.
or are they scavenging the dumps because their main food source is in decline and all they can eat is what is lying aroung at the dump or someones cat?
dont know for sure myself. I just work with salmon and understand how management works with those species. I assume theres food. I'm also not sure as to the area of size polar bears roam if they're like cats the area can be quite large where they protect as "theirs". you could be correct. but when I see an animal dumpster diving I first think of over population.
i watch discovery channel, science channel and animal planet all the time and read science news from science websites. i think we should leave it to the scientists and not listen to some random person stating their opinion. it's like coming here on youtube and listening to what each of us are saying and take that as a credible source. the only reason they are getting closer to people is the same reason rats got closer to people, thrown out food. where there are people there is food.
well... polar bears eat seals, seals eat fish and shell fish, if the polar bears are gone then the population of seals goes up. the seals then eat more fish and shellfish causing less fish and shellfish for fisherman to catch. the fisherman are lossing money because of the extra effort they put in to keep up with demand of fish and shellfish. when you go to the grocery store to buy fish and/or shellfish (shrimp, crabs, lobster, etc.) it is going to cost you alot more.
So your argument is that polar bears provide a valuable service by thinning out the seal population thus benefiting humans who catch or eat fish.
I don't find that argument compelling.
Humans could be far more efficient at curbing seal populations if this was the case. Plus the seals are highly edible and have useful skin, fur, and fat.
think about all the money we would have to spend to curb the seal population... and think about what PETA and most women would say. but fine, how is this arguement... if we let the bear go extinct what are the indiginous people going to do for food and clothing? The fur is used to sew pants and footwear, the meat is edible, the fat is used in food and as a fuel for lighting homes, the gallbladder and sometimes heart were dried and powdered for medicinal purposes. there, they benefit people.
What are we to gain by wiping them out? How does that make us a better people to ignore global warming when we could do something about it. Their extinction would be tragic and a warning sign of bad things to come.
To respond to your first sentence, we gain the victory over an adversary. As apex predators, humans and bears compete for resources. Also bears represent a natural threat to humans. Therefore we gain resources and security by eliminating them.
I said nothing about ignoring climate change.
What you define as "tragic" is subjective. How are they a warning sign?
Are not our scientific methods of data collection a more reliable indicator of "bad things" which might occur in the future?
Unless you eat seals and hunt in the same area, polar bears do not compete for resources. The extinction of the polar bear is significant because it is one of the largest organisms on the planet and it lives in a place that is nearly devoid of humans. The only reason it is going extinct is from its habitat disappearing as a direct result of global warming.
The nigh extinction of the polar bear IS data that's being collected. Their disappearance is important data scientists are using to monitor the progress of global warming.
Simple answer. Polar Bears are a living and breathing animal. They are unique for being Polar Bears, they aren't White Grizzly Bears, they're Polar Bears. Let them go extinct and there will never be another Polar Bear ever again. That is why they must not be allowed to go extinct. It is not their time to go.
You're right. I'm not someone to decide when a species "time" to go extinct is. Neither is any human, and yet we've already been responsible for many extinctions. A polar bear will never hunt humanity to extinction because it doesn't have the ability to, humans unbalance the natural order of the world which is why we have to be responsible for our actions.
We caused Global Warming, we can't just sit back and ignore the ramifications that our disregard for the environment have caused.
Cars are not part of the natural order, boats are not part of the natural order, all of the CO2 we pump into the atmosphere is not part of the natural order.
Stop trying to defend pollution. The simple fact is, YOU ARE WRONG.
I don't see any global warming as a problem if there such a thing. I do see a continuation of the end of an iceage - I guess you could call that global warming if you want.
Curious to learn why they go to an open pile of refuse like that. Are they reeeely starving??
Or opportunists; like their cousins> Brown & Black bears that live in Yellowstone Park and have plenty to eat but still pick through garbage and ravage unkempt campsites? Hmmm... or is it man competing for the same food sources? Derrrr!
Instead of thumbing down my comment perhaps it would be more forthcoming to disprove the decades of telemetric and photograph data gathered from the NASA 'Aqua Satellite' showing the polar caps are in fact GROWING not shrinking.
@RocketManF4
Polar Bear science states that Polar Bears are threatened. Its not based on whether their population is increasing or decreasing now, its bases on their numbers relative to a specific time ago. Sure they are increasing now because they are protected.
You obviously hate science and are hypocritically using bad science to justify your ignorant views.
mephesh 2 years ago
Mephest again you are wrong
polar bears have been increasing since the 1950ies when we started to count them. Again look at a longer time scale there is nothing unusal about climate today. Nothing unusal about storms or anything
RocketManF4 2 years ago
Thanks for your views RocketmanF4. I'm sure you love your FoxNews, Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck. You believe in God, guns and gold. You hate women, drugs and peace. You are forgiven for your sin if you attend church regularly. You and your friends are going to heaven and everyone else is going to hell.
mephesh 2 years ago
mephesh
There you go like a AGW supporter attacking anyone who dares to not follow you. Please tell me what specific time you are refering to when you said "Its not based on whether their population is increasing or decreasing now, its bases on their numbers relative to a specific time ago"
RocketManF4 2 years ago
RocketManF4
Have a look at the Wikipedia Polar Bear page, they are listed as threatened. We need to save all species from becoming extinct.
mephesh 2 years ago
mephesh
you are again wrong
Why is the "threatened" only in the future not now, as now they are growing in number. You should look at climate temps going back before 1850 and you will see there is nothing unusal about what is happening with temp now.
RocketManF4 2 years ago
RocketManF4 Could the Eskimo reporting be biased? Could all the Eskimo reporting be biased? Yes of course. And they live near the polar bears so they will see them all the time. And that crap about Environmentalists using the Polar Bear as a cute animal symbol is all lies. They want to hunt bears so they are biased.
Learn some climate science or should I teach you? The planet is heating up!
mephesh 2 years ago
So I'm to believe you and not believe climate scientists because you have some climate data. How much climate science do you know? Can you tell me the first five factors in climate change in order? I doubt it. Can you explain why CO2 trails temp in some cases (the reverse order)? I doubt it. Can you understand why temp data can be used to undermine climate change?
mephesh 2 years ago
mephesh
First the US and Canada govt. both have research and graphs that prove that polar bears are incresing in numbers. So in your world co2 trailing temp by a average of 800 years every time in the past is "the reverse order" and its still that way once you look up temp records going back to the ice age, NOTHING unusal about todays climate
RocketManF4 2 years ago
mephesh
do you understand there are over 11,000,000 species on this planet, do you only care about this cute one? And why is it threatened when in the real world they are doing fine?
RocketManF4 2 years ago
ahhh I'm so wrong again help me ahhhhhhh
mephesh 2 years ago
So tell me, do we believe the Storey teller
AL GORE?
Or do we believe the people who really live there?
Take AL out back and shoot him for lying!
TheReallitycheck 2 years ago 2
I remember fishermen in the East Coast saying the same thing about the cod.
Scientific studies were showing that the cod was in serious decline.
The fishing community said loud and clear "NO it isn't, it's fine"...
Uh huh.
Sounds all too familiar.
Opiman000 2 years ago
Oh so the people who eat bears are saying scientists are wrong!? rofl
So more bears are coming into town, big whoop. If the place they normally hunt is MELTING AWAY then of course they'll find other places to hunt.
This is like listening to a fat dutchman say the dodo bird is flourishing as he's sucking meat off a bone. I always thought Eskimo people were wise for some reason. They're just the hicks of the world's refrigerator.
LoryLandskipper 2 years ago
Get your racists head out of your ass. The fact that the bear increases are bad news for the oil companies that are pushing the global warming B.S. is no reason for you to become a hater.
Yes, you heard me right.. The global warming B.S. is being funded by Shell and B.P., not Academia. It's so they can control energy through "carbon trading" after peak oil. Gore and Ken Lay worked it out. A former Enron lawyer quit when they told him they wanted him to help with it and spilled his beans.
electrostatic1 2 years ago
This is a pretty far out concept. I'm very intrigued. Do you have any sources of this information? Anything you could link me to?
LoryLandskipper 2 years ago
I believe this is a problem if the numbers are declining. If they are not as the Inuit say. Then they do have every right to hunt these animals. The deciding factor here is clearly the actual truth behind the decline. Hunting when done with care and organizational group IE Ministry of Natural Resources, is a fundamental piece of the conservation of animals. Hunting provides direct taxation funding for conservation by way of tags and license fees. As long as the population is monitored.
waubamikrider 2 years ago
The polar bear is awesome. They look so peaceful and tame. Lets do everything we can to stop their decline. I can't believe these morons are shooting them. How can these idiots sleep at night. Watching the shooting makes me sick. How about I shoot you in the head RETARD? I'd rather you be extinct than the these amazing creatures.
mephesh 2 years ago
They're using rubber bullets to scare them away so people don't get mauled. If they didn't leave piles of garbage laying about maybe they'd loose interest? I get along fine with critters & deer in my yard, up close even. We support each other. The key is 'balance' without fear. No need to shoot anything. Even my garden is safe, plenty to share due to propagating bio diversity.
GnosticNinja 2 years ago
at 0:55 they show a guy shooting a gun and then a dead bear. They have put two unrelated clips together to make it look they are killing the bears. Thanks for reply, I feel better knowing the bears arent being killed.
mephesh 2 years ago
mephesh
You are so wrong "They look so peaceful and tame" they only look that way because they are cute, but in real life they are killing machines. How do you sleep at night after eating chicken, beef or pigs?
RocketManF4 2 years ago
@RocketManF4
I said they *look* peaceful and tame. Of course they are killing machines. They are designed to catch and eat ringed seals and bearded seals. They live on meat and sleep well at night.
Yeah I eat all kinds of meat just like the polar bear. Get over it.
mephesh 2 years ago
mephesh
Again you are wrong there are more polar bears now than 20 years ago. So in your world it's ok to eat meat as long as it comes pre wrapped in plastic but not the native people who hunt for there meat?
RocketManF4 2 years ago
@RocketManF4
The issue is "Are polar bears threatened?". Yes they are. Lets do all we can to save them.
mephesh 2 years ago
mephesh
Why do you think they are threatened? And say they are so what, what will happen when they are all gone? You may have a shortage of cute animals to care about?
RocketManF4 2 years ago
RocketManF4
Have a look at the Wikipedia Polar Bear page, they are listed as threatened. We need to save all species from becoming extinct.
mephesh 2 years ago
That old guy might be seeing the same polar bear 300 times. This is bad reporting. Tag some bears, do some population studies. This is media murder. Why undermine science? The studies show the bears are in decline.
mephesh 2 years ago
yea, i hate these anti-science morons that just "k now" better than the smartest brightest people of our time, who work round the clock on these problems. =\
NwZ2 2 years ago
Well you pressed the reply button that was next to my name instead of his.
BlackKingX 2 years ago
Were you being sarcastic and taking a jab at Scientists then? Not a fan of science?
BlackKingX 2 years ago
A little red in the face now are you?
BlackKingX 2 years ago
Stop embarrassing yourself already and maybe do a little research on Polar Bears. Mainly relating to their habitat.
BlackKingX 2 years ago
Man is the greatest threat to all other animal species on this planet. Yep people get mad when they have animals in their yard or on their properties. Do not blame the animals they been there. Blame man and continuing occupation of land invading their habitats.
dmp079 2 years ago
Almost every European country has reported on Climategate....why hasn't the United States yet?
goforthewhole 2 years ago
CLIMATEGATE ends the global warming scam. Now AGW trolls can only shoot off their mouths while their pants are draped around their ankles because CLIMATEGATE is not going away.
Probesoul 2 years ago 2
Of Course they're seeing more bears, they have less ice to live on, so naturally they have to migrate south into inhabited areas. This is %¤%&#%¤ basic stuff...
1:18 - not a very natural place for them to be (on land!).
lookslikepat 2 years ago
GOOGLE CLIMATEGATE
Why is the corporate media not reporting on this?
kungfujones1 2 years ago
Scientists, something you are obviously not.
BlackKingX 2 years ago
we (people) are the reason for any decline in animals, trees, food, or any other natural process in which things are used to be in the norm. and because of the WE are the only ones to blame when there is a decline. not bacuse of warm weather. if it was weather, there would be nmore like a 30 degree change willing to introduce this vid, not 2 degrees at most. these scientists are getting paid by theives and need to be stopped; but they won't.
scourgefe1nd 2 years ago
Amateur debunkers carry no weight in academia and have no relevance in the discussion of climate change in the scientific community Since other scientists did not debunk a formal presentation on the topic of climate change, why would an amateur think that they could? Amateurish debunking approach is nothing more than a type argumentative arrogance that attracts others and it gives the debunker a sense of power Debunking sites are most definitely NOT scientific debate and critical inquiry.
mynameisbobtoo 2 years ago
These people live there. They've lived there all their life. Generation after generation. They have the most experience in regard to these questions.
Pvtjamesryan2 2 years ago
clitmategate
dirtybird2212 2 years ago 3
since some are stupid let me explain in other terms if 1 million people said they saw an extraterrestrial you know an Alien only 1 person needs to be correct to make it true. so 100% of scientists must be all liars to make this untrue. now flip what I said around if 999,999 people say its true we don't question majority even if it only takes 1 person to be correct. confused yet, I'm not disputing there claims I'm saying people are retarded if they don't think humans are effecting our planet
sx200ser 2 years ago
Inuits would know, in my area the scientists declared a wolf species extinct back in the 80's when there was still a live population. After 30 years of reports by locals about mountain lions which science said was extinct in my state, it was announced that they had returned to our region, only because someone shot one and carcasses were being found along the roadside because of vehicular strikes. Science has a long way to go IMHO.
mojdfiv 2 years ago
Seriously people, you rather Listen to a Scientist? Or just a random joe. People criticize Scientist to much, when in fact its because of Science and Research that things advance in Technology, Knowledge, and Medicine.
WhatsAfterThisPlace 2 years ago
ever heard of corruption in scientific community?
4rcane 2 years ago
misnomer.. a ' corrupt scientist ' is not a scientist.
kennykenflo 2 years ago
I think 4rcane was thinking of FOX News Analysts - who as anyone will tell you - are not scientists.
BlackKingX 2 years ago
climate warming exposed by hacker google this
ENJOYOURMATRIXX 2 years ago
Yea Global Warming is a hoax, I mean all that CO2 we are realizing doesn't matter it just disappears and we don't have to worry about it. Boy did I just sound ignorant|?
WhatsAfterThisPlace 2 years ago
Download the documents, folks!
Link in my channel comments...
Tressco 2 years ago
Some people dont get that at some point when you break the food chain, it will eventually affect humans. God made all this according to some of you, so why not value and respect the earth you were given ?
clevy911 2 years ago
You're counting the same bear more than once idiot. Bears are just hanging out around humans more than before, they know they can get easy food by digging through trash. Thus why you're seeing them more often..
BlackKingX 2 years ago
Leave it to Canadian pansies to have their national media run a 3-minute story on something that's of no concern to people other than animal rights folks, animal lovers and global warming alarmists (like 5% of the population).
whoo689 2 years ago
Has there ever been a truly vibrant, thriving polar bear community ANYWHERE with thousands if not 10s of thousands?? Esp. in recent human history. So who cares if there's a few less. I mean, even from an ecological standpoint, if polar bears were to go extinct, why would it matter? They don't contribute to the system. They just run around, mate, sleep, hibernate and find food. they live in places so cold it's hardly possible to really affect anything.
whoo689 2 years ago
How is this even a debate? Doesn't the U.S. gov't alone have enough money and technology to monitor all the polar bears at both poles and see whether or not this is true?? Are the people who monitor these cameras asleep at the wheel?
whoo689 2 years ago
What idiot would waste money monitoring polar bears at the South Pole?
BlackKingX 2 years ago
I remember reading that the Inuit leave their old people out on the snow to die. myth? hmm
cyber9sockpuppet 2 years ago
Arrest the Climate Criminals.
airborne373 2 years ago
Man is so cruel. First, he destroys the polar bears' habitat so that they can't hunt food for themselves and then he shoots them when they resort to scavenging garbage dumps to feed their hunger. God, we are one, sick, heartless species, huh? We want the whole damn world for just ourselves and to hell with any other fellow passengers on this big, blue marble known as Earth.
JixMa 2 years ago
Their scavenging the dumps because their population is to great. Its what happens in areas where population growth has reached its limits.. ever hear of a cougar eating a neighbors cat off its door step? Man is to blame, but at the same time you've got to understand wildlife conservation.. and hunting for these animals is part of conserving.
Tunedup81 2 years ago
or are they scavenging the dumps because their main food source is in decline and all they can eat is what is lying aroung at the dump or someones cat?
clayfromsanantonio 2 years ago
dont know for sure myself. I just work with salmon and understand how management works with those species. I assume theres food. I'm also not sure as to the area of size polar bears roam if they're like cats the area can be quite large where they protect as "theirs". you could be correct. but when I see an animal dumpster diving I first think of over population.
Tunedup81 2 years ago
i watch discovery channel, science channel and animal planet all the time and read science news from science websites. i think we should leave it to the scientists and not listen to some random person stating their opinion. it's like coming here on youtube and listening to what each of us are saying and take that as a credible source. the only reason they are getting closer to people is the same reason rats got closer to people, thrown out food. where there are people there is food.
clayfromsanantonio 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have a question for people who feel passionately that the polar bear population must be protected from humans.
Why?
Not trying to be rude its a serious question. What if they all died out b/c of climate change and human interference with their habitats?
So what?
How do polar bears benefit people?
revenge53142 2 years ago
you sir , are retarded.
ToeInspector 2 years ago
I'm not being facetious, It's a serious question but obviously you are incapable of engaging in worthwhile debate.
To respond at your level....
I know you are but what am I? :P
revenge53142 2 years ago
Problem = Reaction.
Just pay your fart tax, Al Gore needs more hard currency.
ToeInspector 2 years ago
I asked why humans should be concerned with the continued existence of polar bears.
If you'd like to contribute to that conversation you're welcome but you haven't yet, so please find a different conversation.
revenge53142 2 years ago
well... polar bears eat seals, seals eat fish and shell fish, if the polar bears are gone then the population of seals goes up. the seals then eat more fish and shellfish causing less fish and shellfish for fisherman to catch. the fisherman are lossing money because of the extra effort they put in to keep up with demand of fish and shellfish. when you go to the grocery store to buy fish and/or shellfish (shrimp, crabs, lobster, etc.) it is going to cost you alot more.
clayfromsanantonio 2 years ago
So your argument is that polar bears provide a valuable service by thinning out the seal population thus benefiting humans who catch or eat fish.
I don't find that argument compelling.
Humans could be far more efficient at curbing seal populations if this was the case. Plus the seals are highly edible and have useful skin, fur, and fat.
revenge53142 2 years ago
think about all the money we would have to spend to curb the seal population... and think about what PETA and most women would say. but fine, how is this arguement... if we let the bear go extinct what are the indiginous people going to do for food and clothing? The fur is used to sew pants and footwear, the meat is edible, the fat is used in food and as a fuel for lighting homes, the gallbladder and sometimes heart were dried and powdered for medicinal purposes. there, they benefit people.
clayfromsanantonio 2 years ago
What are we to gain by wiping them out? How does that make us a better people to ignore global warming when we could do something about it. Their extinction would be tragic and a warning sign of bad things to come.
joshuag5732 2 years ago
To respond to your first sentence, we gain the victory over an adversary. As apex predators, humans and bears compete for resources. Also bears represent a natural threat to humans. Therefore we gain resources and security by eliminating them.
I said nothing about ignoring climate change.
What you define as "tragic" is subjective. How are they a warning sign?
Are not our scientific methods of data collection a more reliable indicator of "bad things" which might occur in the future?
revenge53142 2 years ago
Unless you eat seals and hunt in the same area, polar bears do not compete for resources. The extinction of the polar bear is significant because it is one of the largest organisms on the planet and it lives in a place that is nearly devoid of humans. The only reason it is going extinct is from its habitat disappearing as a direct result of global warming.
joshuag5732 2 years ago
So you're saying global warming is killing off the polar bears.
I agree.
Also I think you're saying we are causing global warming therefore we are killing off the polar bears.
Sure.
SO WHAT?
They are "warning us" its getting warmer?
We know that by collecting data.
My point is why should it matter to me if every polar bear died tomorrow?
I do not mourn the loss of the sabre toothed cat or dire wolf. Why should i care about preserving the polar bear?
revenge53142 2 years ago
The nigh extinction of the polar bear IS data that's being collected. Their disappearance is important data scientists are using to monitor the progress of global warming.
joshuag5732 2 years ago
because, as EARTHLINGS, a decrease in biological diversity is problematic.
If some near fatal catastrophe befalls our planet, diversity would determine whether life would go on or not.
Just because you can't think of anything in the IMMEDIATE sense doesn't say anything about whether such a view is conclusive.
You're prejudice is showing.
NwZ2 2 years ago
Simple answer. Polar Bears are a living and breathing animal. They are unique for being Polar Bears, they aren't White Grizzly Bears, they're Polar Bears. Let them go extinct and there will never be another Polar Bear ever again. That is why they must not be allowed to go extinct. It is not their time to go.
BlackKingX 2 years ago
Grizzly bears huh? what a non sequitur
lets save all the hamsters b/c they're not gerbils
Who are you do decide when a species "time" to go extinct is?
Biologist believe 99.9% of all the species that have ever existed have gone extinct.
All of which, I would venture to say, happened without your consent or approval.
Whats one more?
In my opinion we should worry about the human species surviving.
A polar bear would glady eat any human given the chance. Even a global warming activist.
revenge53142 2 years ago
You're right. I'm not someone to decide when a species "time" to go extinct is. Neither is any human, and yet we've already been responsible for many extinctions. A polar bear will never hunt humanity to extinction because it doesn't have the ability to, humans unbalance the natural order of the world which is why we have to be responsible for our actions.
We caused Global Warming, we can't just sit back and ignore the ramifications that our disregard for the environment have caused.
BlackKingX 2 years ago
"humans unbalance the natural order"
So then you are arguing that humans are not part of the natural order?
They can't cause human's extinction. SO?
Good, if they could they probably would. Nature is unforgiving in the manner in which species are created and destroyed.
I'm not advocating we ignore the ramifications of global temperature increasing.
I'm saying if one of those ramifications is all the polar bears die off...Good, we're better off without them.
revenge53142 2 years ago
Cars are not part of the natural order, boats are not part of the natural order, all of the CO2 we pump into the atmosphere is not part of the natural order.
Stop trying to defend pollution. The simple fact is, YOU ARE WRONG.
BlackKingX 2 years ago
WELL SINCE YOU SAY IT IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS...it must be true
You seem unable to actually articulate an argument against my position.
Just conducting a google search provides a large body of possible evidence against my point (which i obviously disagree with)
Instead you keep trying to change the argument to suit your talking points.
I haven't attempted to defend pollution. The simple fact is, YOU'RE CHANGING THE SUBJECT.
Im against polar bears, not for pollution
revenge53142 2 years ago
I don't see any global warming as a problem if there such a thing. I do see a continuation of the end of an iceage - I guess you could call that global warming if you want.
pollution is pretty much a local concern
these people want to hunt bears let um
marniespeaks 2 years ago
Curious to learn why they go to an open pile of refuse like that. Are they reeeely starving??
Or opportunists; like their cousins> Brown & Black bears that live in Yellowstone Park and have plenty to eat but still pick through garbage and ravage unkempt campsites? Hmmm... or is it man competing for the same food sources? Derrrr!
P.S. 'global warming' scam just got busted!
GnosticNinja 2 years ago
That is just what I was thinking Ninja.
tantoi10man 2 years ago
its called CLIMATE GATE
and its real, biggest hoax in awhile
AND ITS BUSTED!
xxxxdarksidexxxx 2 years ago
Don't confuse the neo-communist, greenies with facts and logic. I was going to post the same thing you did.
arkivx1 2 years ago
Instead of thumbing down my comment perhaps it would be more forthcoming to disprove the decades of telemetric and photograph data gathered from the NASA 'Aqua Satellite' showing the polar caps are in fact GROWING not shrinking.
Post it here for all to see>>>
GnosticNinja 2 years ago
2 Words: Sarah Palin
daguy1234 2 years ago
Fiction.
GTS4tw 2 years ago
I teach Polar Bears how to swim. For only $10,000 us federal reserve notes we can save a polar bear for eskimo food.
deanphilpot 2 years ago
Bunch of Royal Green Nazis creating genocidal Eco Science on the fly. Aj Gore is twice as fat as the largest of white bears.
drewsick 2 years ago
they are the worlds greatest swimming land animals
they cant find food? is global warming killing the fish as well and the seals?
gimme a break ill trust the people that live there
SaveOurSovereignty3 2 years ago
The bears are coming into town, because they are STARVING.
PersianPaladin 2 years ago
No their not assclown!!!!, they are coming into town because they are good eating and they just want the world to know!!!
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
No their not, assclown!!!, they are coming into town to let everybody know how good they taste and that they want to be back on the menu!
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago