Added: 3 years ago
From: jeffwaugh
Views: 4,473
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I can't stop laughing at this. I can't remember the context of it but it comes off as a joke now, played deadpan..

  • Oh the baby!

  • Define "same job". Truly, if you are on $150,000 a year combined income you don't NEED the baby bonus.

  • I can't believe it's not baby...

  • OK, let's take on board your advise. Let's say that I am my wife earns $100,000 a year. You and your wife earns $25,000 a year. My baby should be made equal with your baby (all babies are equal Brendan). Thus, we need to redress the balance of available money to the baby. Thus you now need to be paid $75,000 so that your baby is now on an equal footing to my baby.

    Doesn't work too well now, does it?

    Seriously, this was a stunt - a bad one. Logic is obvious not Nelson's strong point.

  • what a wanker this is the bloke that is going to challenge rudd.

    lol lmfao.

  • I love babies!

    So do dingoes!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more