OK, let's take on board your advise. Let's say that I am my wife earns $100,000 a year. You and your wife earns $25,000 a year. My baby should be made equal with your baby (all babies are equal Brendan). Thus, we need to redress the balance of available money to the baby. Thus you now need to be paid $75,000 so that your baby is now on an equal footing to my baby.
Doesn't work too well now, does it?
Seriously, this was a stunt - a bad one. Logic is obvious not Nelson's strong point.
I can't stop laughing at this. I can't remember the context of it but it comes off as a joke now, played deadpan..
utubenicholas 1 year ago
Oh the baby!
martydosh 2 years ago
Define "same job". Truly, if you are on $150,000 a year combined income you don't NEED the baby bonus.
tbsdy 3 years ago
I can't believe it's not baby...
wenying1988 3 years ago
OK, let's take on board your advise. Let's say that I am my wife earns $100,000 a year. You and your wife earns $25,000 a year. My baby should be made equal with your baby (all babies are equal Brendan). Thus, we need to redress the balance of available money to the baby. Thus you now need to be paid $75,000 so that your baby is now on an equal footing to my baby.
Doesn't work too well now, does it?
Seriously, this was a stunt - a bad one. Logic is obvious not Nelson's strong point.
tbsdy 3 years ago 2
what a wanker this is the bloke that is going to challenge rudd.
lol lmfao.
australiannewss 3 years ago
I love babies!
So do dingoes!
atsridge 3 years ago 4