"Antigravity" method 1a of 15, Geometric Electrostatic, Group IA

[freethisone]

hi, i have been doing some research, i have many of the same conclusions. perhaps you can read up on my thread than get back to me, or register on the forum, and post additional information.

hope to see you there. opensourceenergy.or under lifter technology section.

thanks, any input you have would be appreciated.

[ilav1m8y]

Isn't it just an UP standing wave (S W) ETHER SOLITON (Below) with the - bottom heated to incandescent to increase negative thermonic flow of the electrons similar to an X-ray machine with bottom 4 dual polarity spheres create the "10a of 15 Mag" method for electrogravic by tilting the S W ETHER SOLITON in that one direction beaming the craft S W through the N-S borealis poles (like Tesla's Tubes of Force) of the resonating magnetic feild but with 90 right angle turns at the flick of a switch?

[ilav1m8y]

this is so simple, this is Tesla's propulsion theory except his description picture is on its side with a positively charged dome and a negatively charged bottom with three sphere dual charge capacitors on the bottom. The object doesn't rotate the magnetic feild does (this is called a streptation feild), charge is rapidly lost at the pointed circumference of the craft and direction is controlled by simply changing the charge direction of the three spheres. Nazi's had 4 sphere's could do 90 turns

[ghjurx452]

"anti gravity" implies that the force of gravity is not applied to the levitating object but in reality there is simply an equal and opposite force applied to the object.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@ ghjurx452 thanks for your comment, if you refer to my “Antigravity” Method 1a, the opening credits will hopefully explain it to you.

Cheers JRI

[ednakazuya12]

@ghjurx452 can you explain in F=mg^2

[jango67]

Anti gravity does excist and yes we could have vehicles like the ones in starwars

but there are certian groups that will pay millions / billions to keep it hidden simply because it would eliminate emissions.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Thanks jango67 , some believe they already exist!

[Taylaron1]

on your electrostatic levitation device using two spheres; did you use a Van De Graff generator or a Tesla coil? Trying to figure out if I can try it with my Van De Graff machine.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Taylaron,

The top metal sphere was charged to approximately +30 to 110 KDC with a Cockcroft Walton multiplier that converts a 10KV High Frequency 15 to 25KHz Alternating Current via a flyback transformer push pull oscillator the bottom sphere or plate is earthed, experiments are performed with different geometries of metallic charged surfaces, that suspend metallic objects such as the metal sphere with two sharp points shown by electrostatic induction, so a Van De Graaff should work.

[Juefawn]

What happens if you use a container to keep the levitating matter from leaving the field?

[ElsewhereIsHere]

That is not anti-gravity. That is upward thrust caused by an electric charge.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@ElsewhereIsHere, thanks for your comment, if you refer to my “Antigravity” Method 1a, the opening credits will hopefully explain it to you.

Cheers JRI

[damienandmusic]

ya i know as i said so its nt anti gravity ,but gravity is everywhere our suns gravity interacts with other suns,yet it is the weakest of all the forces.electromagnatism only overpowers the gravity force .but anyway back 2 my first question,what wil power the electric field and how could u use it

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi damienandmusic

As I stated previously, according to the current definition, such as wiki and others, it is antigravity! which is the idea of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity. Please state the source of your definition, as I am very interested in, where it comes from. I agree that gravity is a weak force. Sorry that I did not respond to your other question previously,

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

I didnt understand what you are asking, when you ask what will power the electric field as the simplest answer I can offer is electrical energy or a magnetic field! Sorry you will have to elaborate. Hopefully the following may answer your question. In one form the gravitational Poynting vector, provides a mechanism for the transfer of gravitational energy to a system of falling objects.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Where s=(c2/4pieG)yxB, and has many other very interesting derivatives.Einstein field equations in Einstein's theory of general relativity describe the fundamental interaction of gravitation as a result of space-time being curved by matter and energy which equate space-time curvature with the energy and momentum within that space-time which is similar to the way that electromagnetic fields are determined using charges and currents via Maxwell's equations.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Classical Newtonian Inertia is a property of matter due to the strictly local electrical force interactions of each of the (electrically charged) elementary particles of the mass (masseon particles) with the surrounding (electrically charged) virtual particles (virtual masseons) of the quantum vacuum.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

The sum of all the tiny electrical forces (photon exchanges with the vacuum particles) that originate in each charged elementary particle of the accelerated mass is the source of the total inertial force of a mass which opposes accelerated motion in Newton's law 'F = MA'. Einstein's principle of equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass is the origin of gravitational mass from the perspective of quantum inertia.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Poynting suggests that gravity also involves the same 'inertial' electrical force component that exists in inertial mass. Einstein's general relativistic Weak Equivalence Principle originates from common 'lower level' quantum vacuum processes occurring in both gravitational mass and inertial mass in accordance with the principles of quantum field theory.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

To adduce reasons in support, it does appear that all matter and the quantum fields of the strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions of our entire material universe are confined to a 3D brane that floats around in a higher dimensional space where they roam wild. The apparent weakness of gravity would therefore be an illusion to inhabitants of the brane: gravity is merely diluted as it spreads out into additional dimensions that we cannot perceive.

Thanks for your comment JRI

[longded]

@damienandmusic thinking taping in to already existant fields, like when the static charge in a jumper made from certain materials powers hair ? but I am from noobshire?

;]

[damienandmusic]

so this is not anyi gravity its just another way to overcome gravity like a rocket or a plane,but it only works between an electric field,what wil power that ,if it works how could u use it.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Any other interpretation of antigravity is a misconception by the user of the word, so you will have to forgive yourself of your own invalid interpretation, as I didnt intend to offend. These series of videos were Filmed 1991-1996, with 15 methods of levitating an object known to the author, and were edited from the video Antigravity the reality made in 1996, which was a compilation of experiments between the years 1985 to 1996

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

with heavier than air devices usually referred to as antigravity as they achieve flight without propellers, jets or rocket propulsion. The method shown on this post is called "Antigravity" method 1a of 15, Geometric Electrostatic, Group IA, but I couldnt call the whole video by this name as other methods are presented according to the above current definition you will notice in all the titles I have accurately described it as

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Antigravity" method ..... notice also that in all the titles the word antigravity is in quotation marks which are also used to indicate that the writer realizes that a word is not being used in its commonly-accepted sense.

Thanks for your comment JRI

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi shkotay,

According to the current definition, Anti-gravity is the idea of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity. It does not refer to countering the gravitational force by an opposing force of a different nature, as a helium balloon does; instead, anti-gravity requires that the fundamental causes of the force of gravity be made either not present or not applicable to the place or object through some kind of technological intervention.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi damienandmusic

As I stated previously, according to the current definition, such as wiki and others, it is antigravity! which is the idea of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity. Please state the source of your definition, as I am very interested in, where it comes from. I agree that gravity is a weak force. Sorry that I did not respond to your other question previously,

[longded]

touchdown looks a bit wobbly, like the buttlerfly with only one wing?

;]

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi longded,

Yes if you say so, as I have never seen a butterfly with one wing touchdown. LOL

Thanks for your comment.

Cheers

JRI

[longded]

I was more asking if you asked what would the gain be from two of the flakes connected? like its how butterflys do it? complex hardware insects!

;]

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi longded,

Electrostatic levitation relies on geometry, two or more flakes connected would also work, so you could have a pseudo butterfly flying aboput by electrostatic means. I have shown the simplest way.

Yes nature is amazing and through reverse engineering we are still trying to catch up to their technology that was devised billions of years ago, even before man/woman existed.

Cheers

John

[shkotay]

I am simply a layperson in this field, but the mention of antigravity is used quite a bit here. I see many experiments using known properties of magnetism/electromagnetism, but how does this necessarily apply to antigravity in and of itself per se?  As far as I know gravity can only still be observed indirectly, such as the effects it has but nobody has ever yet observed a graviton. Mind you my speakers are broken and I am probably missing something and talking out of my Heiny lol! Great vids

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi shkotay,

According to the current definition, Anti-gravity is the idea of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity. It does not refer to countering the gravitational force by an opposing force of a different nature, as a helium balloon does; instead, anti-gravity requires that the fundamental causes of the force of gravity be made either not present or not applicable to the place or object through some kind of technological intervention.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

The word antigravity also denotes a range of ideas, adopted by various people to mean different concepts. Which is why I have the term antigravity in inverted commas. What you see presented was edited from the original Antigravity the reality made in 1996 and filmed 1991-1996, with 15 methods of levitating an object known to the author, and was a early attempt to show people what is real.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

I can assure you that at the time the series of edits were ground breaking at the time. For example Jonathan Campbell of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Centre only received a U.S. patents for experiments similar to methods 2 & 3 in 2001 and 2002. This antigravity method is sometimes referred to as the BiefeldBrown effect , an effect that was discovered by Paul Biefeld and Thomas Townsend Brown during extensive research that

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

was performed during the 1950s and 1960's on the use of this electric propulsion. In the following years, many promising concepts had to be abandoned due to technological limitations and were forgotten, and only till recently considered a scientific fable. The effect has only recently as of 2002 become of interest again, after new experiments confirmed the experiments of the past, such flying devices are now known as EHD thrusters,

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

asymmetric capacitors or lifters. Gravity is like many forces in nature, we do not necessarily have to see the forces, we can observe the effects they produce.

Thanks for your comments and appreciation thereof.

Cheers JRI

[ReyesRobby]

TZM. The Zeitgeist Movement. Om Shanti

[mrtruthify]

Are you aware that it would be relatively easy to "stabalize" the object??????? Ask yourself why the object is not in a constant or static state first, then get back to me.......

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi mrtruthify,

Yes, stability is a function of voltage, distance and geometry of bottom ground plate to top positive charge sphere, refer around 1.52 to 1.59, I could get it so stable that it looks like it is suspended on a string, fearing that it looked fake was the reason why Im playing around with it, it is far more stable with a positive charge on top then with a negative charge on top refer from around 3.36 the negative is on top, the effect still works but tends to bob up and down a lot.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@mrtruthify there was no need to ask myself the question you asked as experimentation gives you a clear understanding of what is occurring, experimentation is the key to understanding, I strongly recommend experimentation, over theory, there are thousands of theories just browse the net and even patents that are based on speculation, the proof as they say is in the pudding.

Cheers JRI

[QuantumNeon]

Great videos, you have made quite a contribution to the world as of now there are a billion videos on YouTube, as you know of very little substance, I have down loaded them to my Sony PSP and now I can watch the any time I am not distracted by INFORMATION OVERLOAD for mass bombardment of garbage that masquerades information, I.E text messages, cellphones, email, headline news, newspapers? or garbage. Please I hope you do understand that society has become less informed about science, etc...

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi QuantumNeon, and thanks for your positive feedback, great to hear that you are enjoying them, you are exactly the type of person like me that I posted these for.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

I also am rather disturbed by the amount of misinformation circling the nett, but then again we must respect the right of free speech and free expression, each person to his own. It also saddens me that society is less informed but then again it would be a boring world if everyone was a scientist, on the bright side there is also less competition. Thanks JRI

[lacanau]

Hey man, you dont do the voice overs for diginfo news do you?

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Iacanau, No I dont do voice overs for diginfo, so I will take this as a compliment, thanks for your comment.

Kind Regards JRI

[AVAMagneticlev]

Hello if the lifting force is above the part being levitated is this electro static suspention not anti gravity or gravity shielding ?

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

According to the current definition, Anti-gravity is the idea of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity. It does not refer to countering the gravitational force by an opposing force of a different nature, as a helium balloon does; instead, anti-gravity requires that the fundamental causes of the force of gravity be made either not present or not applicable to the place or object through some kind of technological intervention.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

These series of videos were Filmed 1991-1996, with 15 methods of levitating an object known to the author, And were edited from the video Antigravity the reality made in 1996, which was a compilation of experiments between the years 1985 to 1996 with heavier than air devices usually referred to as antigravity as they achieve flight without propellers, jets or rocket propulsion.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

You are correct the method shown in this edit is also known as electrostatic suspension, but I couldn't call the whole video by this name as other methods are presented according to the above current definition. Thanks for your interest and your comment.

[Valigon]

why doesn't NASA just use this method for a space elevator... instead of spending billions of dollars to hang cables from a space station....

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Nasa are definitely aware of these types of levitating devises as they have done their own tests at the Gravitec Inc at NASA's NSSTC LEEIF facility in Huntsville Alabama.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

the only possible conclusion that you could draw from this is that they may be looking into it, their own verification of experiments indicate that space vehicles could be made by using the direct conversion of electricity from either solar panels, thermo-electric or electro-nuclear generators into thrust, in the mean time they are working with proven and somewhat reliable rocket technology.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

The effect in a vacuum is less pronounced as in air as atmospheric air helps considerably please refer to ion propulsion explanation offered in my video Antigravity Method 2a and 2B. I have also done experiments that show that the effect is also possible using solid material such as quartz crystals refer Antigravity Method 3 and 3b.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

So I can only guess that they may be on Nasas drawing boards in the very far future when rocket technology will get phased out. The space lift is only one proposal of many and there are many other ways to get into space, I will post a video response of my favourite method as soon as I edit it from the Antigravity the reality documentary I made in 1996,

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

as well as future downloads on many others as soon as I get a chance to edit from the documentary and post. Tomorrows technology starts with todays components and understanding.

Thanks for your comment.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

also please refer to"Antigravity" response to Method 6 & 9 by popular demand, how to levitate on earth's magnetic field., which is another simple method.

[waggabiggadoo]

damn this looks much like something i dreamed forth myself, i got to realize theese dreams, i want my real R/C ufo with full spectrum scanner and infinite supply of energy

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

I have had on the drawing board many designs based on other experiments (remember the ones shown or from 1996) which will work.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

At the moment I can do one with an on board battery power supply or wireless with electricity transmission via a mosfet or valve driven (your choice) Tesla Coil range of approx. 10m wireless (with 40W output Tesla coil limited by the inverse square law) or unlimited with a single thin earth wire like a kite, which you would be able to unwind. Im still working on the unlimited supply of energy bit. If you are interested I will do a costing.

[waggabiggadoo]

onboard battery/supply/energy/thelikes is my goal myself

you dont want any wires if u gonna go to pluto, or wait, maybe you do lol. imagine a (nano)wire going all the way to pluto or a big chain of steel, lol, i wonder if there is enough steel in earth for it? doesnt really matter cuz i am aiming for full-spectrum manifestations devices as well, changing spaces by means of frequency technology, transmuting anything to anythinh. soon, you will grab blueprints from the neural net and sound a car