Sure you can burn your house down, but your neighbors might have a potentially valid complaint about the smoke and ash that would not remain on your property alone.
although the law of property is an illusion, we still need it to govern our republic. Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.- Mark Twain.
With Laws we have a republic, but with too many we have a problem. Knoledge means responsibility. Do what you can to spread this message and information.
No I think this is great, he's making sure the ideas he's talking about stick to people's brains. Remember, most people cannot comprehend these things just by simply stating the obvious.
Well speak for yourself. Although i have voted for Ron Paul and Badnarik before him i do not vote for them because i need them to lead me, i vote for them because they are the perfect represenatives for my values and future. I understand where you are comming from, but this form of thinking is the one that installs the leaders we have had for hundred years. Militia needs leaders, not the government.
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT. I think I figured out my mis-understanding.
The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT needs a LEADER that thinks like Michael B. / Ron P.. Every ship has a captain and the Fed Gov has a president. They ARE the LEADERS of their organizations.
They are not MY leader. I am my leader. I am Self Determined.
The governement at all levels is the Servant that has a Leader that (in theory) answers to ME.
So I was thinking, theoretically, if we "could" outright own land, could you buy the land completely surrounding somebody's property and then you know, keep them captive? What's keeping that from happening?
lol well don't forget out right buying the land only applies in texas..and you can buy the land around them but the main rodes are public...and as long as you are not restricting somone elses rights or harming or whatever than you're fine..so the keeping somoone captive idea wouldn't work with the concept of indiviual liberty
Well you also have a right to travel. If you cannot leave your property then you cannot travel and the person is overstepping your rights. I believe the government would have the authority to settle it.
Love it
evilet1111 2 months ago
He looks like Kevin Costner.
73cupcake 11 months ago
Sure you can burn your house down, but your neighbors might have a potentially valid complaint about the smoke and ash that would not remain on your property alone.
kayebullock 2 years ago
@Kayebullock You'd only be responsible for compensating damages period.
crispymidget 1 year ago
2:11 "depends what you're smoking"
heat45jc 2 years ago
@heat45jc
Not really. It's your property.
stevengerson 1 year ago
@stevengerson : I was merely quoting what a guy in the class said.
heat45jc 1 year ago
The arson thing, I'm sure he furthers it in the next vid but you can't burn your house down if it'll burn down your neighbors house.
You can do what you want on your propertys as log as it diesn't effect somebody elses.
Monkor001 2 years ago
I want a house on allodial land! How nice to not pay property taxes!
bigbuggie5 2 years ago
although the law of property is an illusion, we still need it to govern our republic. Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.- Mark Twain.
With Laws we have a republic, but with too many we have a problem. Knoledge means responsibility. Do what you can to spread this message and information.
lorerax1 2 years ago
next
dax313xab 2 years ago
"Do NOT Say Constitutional Rights!"
*in the back*
teehee
"....Constitutional Rights"
Chibbers 3 years ago
this is giving good info, but he's too winey
mreisma 3 years ago
No I think this is great, he's making sure the ideas he's talking about stick to people's brains. Remember, most people cannot comprehend these things just by simply stating the obvious.
yadranko 3 years ago 3
winey, as in irratating. people don't respond well to these kinds of voices. i don't like obama, but imagine his voice saying this guy's words.
mreisma 3 years ago
GOOOOOD POINT!!! ALL this movement is missing is a polished front man.
shadowcii 2 years ago
sheeple need to be lead, people need a represenatives
mercen144 2 years ago
What are you speaking to? Why did you write this to me?
When traveling an uncharted forest, ALL people need a leader to blaze a trail.
shadowcii 2 years ago
Well speak for yourself. Although i have voted for Ron Paul and Badnarik before him i do not vote for them because i need them to lead me, i vote for them because they are the perfect represenatives for my values and future. I understand where you are comming from, but this form of thinking is the one that installs the leaders we have had for hundred years. Militia needs leaders, not the government.
mercen144 2 years ago 2
Would you please answer my question in addition to writing your quips?
In response to your comment, my way of thinking never lead to the types of leaders that have been installed for hundreds of years.
Pioneers are necessary in each and every field of human endeavor.
I do not suppose a man like you needs a leader nor did I inference that in any of my replys.
Please explain why you wrote to me "sheeple need to be lead..."
To what are you speaking to so I can reply informed.
shadowcii 2 years ago
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT. I think I figured out my mis-understanding.
The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT needs a LEADER that thinks like Michael B. / Ron P.. Every ship has a captain and the Fed Gov has a president. They ARE the LEADERS of their organizations.
They are not MY leader. I am my leader. I am Self Determined.
The governement at all levels is the Servant that has a Leader that (in theory) answers to ME.
shadowcii 2 years ago
So I was thinking, theoretically, if we "could" outright own land, could you buy the land completely surrounding somebody's property and then you know, keep them captive? What's keeping that from happening?
bluemalificent 4 years ago
lol well don't forget out right buying the land only applies in texas..and you can buy the land around them but the main rodes are public...and as long as you are not restricting somone elses rights or harming or whatever than you're fine..so the keeping somoone captive idea wouldn't work with the concept of indiviual liberty
benjie2429 4 years ago
you can own land clear and outright. It is called having "Allodial Title" to it, then your land is your "Allodium".
Check out how to do a "Notice of Understanding and Intent" and a "Claim of Right".
Make sure you have clear and outright ownership of yourself (power of attorney) and on your land. That's all it takes... Notice and Grace.
The Notice require 3 witnessing signatures or a Notary Public seal, and then to be put in public record.
OneManAndHisFiction 3 years ago 4
lmao..that is just a funny thought
AmericanValues321 3 years ago
An Easement and title restrictions. And land is generally subdivided (either publically or privately) in such a way to prevent land-lock.
shadowcii 2 years ago
@bluemalificent
Well you also have a right to travel. If you cannot leave your property then you cannot travel and the person is overstepping your rights. I believe the government would have the authority to settle it.
Justajawnie 5 months ago
I had to google it, but it's allodial :)
bluemalificent 4 years ago 3
how do you spell 'lodial'
azzbla 4 years ago