Awww... poor Paulie has to fight the damn mic the whole time, and then he forgets his lyrics.O.o I'm still in awe of him, however. He's just too amazing.
Se non amiamo i Beatles non abbiamo capito nulla di Musica. Se vi piace il classico padroni di farlo, ma loro i Beatles sono i classici del secolo scorso.Vi piacccia o no.
Se non amiamo i Beatles non abbiamo capito nulla di Musica. Se vi piace il classico padroni di farlo, ma loro i Beatles sono i classici del secolo scorso.
sonofrock97, yes and they managed to sound pretty good in spite of only having 30 watt amplifiers until August 1965 Shea stadium concerts,when only 100 watt amps were made specially for these concerts,plus they had no feedback monitors so they couldn't even hear themselves play & sing,yet they still amazingly managed to sing in sync & in tune with each other anyway,plus all of the screaming.Former Kiss guitarist & producer of The heavy metal Beatles tribute album Butchering The Beatles saw them
in 1966 & he said he could only hear parts of them playing Paperback Writer & Baby's In Black & he said they sounded amazing.Also on this very site a member posted The Rolling Stones performing The Beatles I Wanna Be You're Man in from late 1963,in The Beatles Anthology video series,& then The Beatles are shown playing it afterwards. It's like going from Rhinestones to diamonds,& The Beatles version as many have pointed out is faster & more rocking.Of Course The Rolling Stones were only playing
together for somewhat over a year then,The Beatles actually were playing togther including live for several years already,& The Rolling Stones then had the same limited primitive 30 watt amplifiers,& they sounded almost like a bad bar band.Truthfully nobody could sound great on those limited sound systems,but The Beatles live performances from 1963 & 1964 sounded better.I also love The Beatles sound not The Rolling Stones.A guy Steve from Canada said on Artist Facts that he saw The Beatles
in 1966 & The Stones in 1996 (when the sound systems were a million times better by then!) & he said don't get me wrong The Stones were great,but he said they were no match for The Beatles & he said The Beatles were The Greatest Band Ever! Ozzy Osbourne calls them that too,as does Brian May of Queen,Liasm Gallagher & Bob Kulick and many others etc.
you can tell that this is one of their latest concerts.. they started playing terrible with all that noise from the audience.. and look at the faces,, they are like "i don't care, no one is listening anyway.."
I THOUGHT JAPAN WAS ADVANCED IN TECHNOLOGY!?!
JAPAN...
Y U LIE?!!?
JoshhLyons 3 weeks ago
mic
vitamine1000mg 4 months ago
death to this micro.
Razzt25 7 months ago
Awww... poor Paulie has to fight the damn mic the whole time, and then he forgets his lyrics.O.o I'm still in awe of him, however. He's just too amazing.
MeLoDy151416 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Se non amiamo i Beatles non abbiamo capito nulla di Musica. Se vi piace il classico padroni di farlo, ma loro i Beatles sono i classici del secolo scorso.Vi piacccia o no.
Perfidia4ever 11 months ago
Se non amiamo i Beatles non abbiamo capito nulla di Musica. Se vi piace il classico padroni di farlo, ma loro i Beatles sono i classici del secolo scorso.
Perfidia4ever 11 months ago
ll at georges wave
34LOLWTF 1 year ago
smack the shit out that microphone paulie!!!!! its not wothy of your greatness
marili5770 1 year ago
What the fuck is wrong with Paul's mic? It keeps spazzing to the side!
spaztastic666 1 year ago 8
@spaztastic666 it would have been easier if they had a permenant singer; no instuments. they could hold the mic.
sqwanto1996 1 year ago
I love it when George waves!
AmyGrace1234 1 year ago 6
Must be frustrating to play in these conditions
li4m 1 year ago
haha microphone fail!
Shaguar66 1 year ago 2
lol george waves when he forgets to hit a note!!! lol
manguy500 1 year ago
what so awuful mic
huorscinnamon 1 year ago
lol paul smacks the mic
poopyhead002 2 years ago 3
what happened to pauls mic
poopyhead002 2 years ago
Microphone: Made in USA
Microphone Holder: Made in China (OF COURSE! XD)
TheBernie1996 2 years ago
The Beatles: Made in Liverpool
ViaCydonia 2 years ago 14
@ViaCydonia hahahahaha
granpotter 2 years ago
Paul must have been really annoyed with the mic lol! Go Beatles!!
swanniG2 2 years ago
HAHA PAUL, you show that mic who's boss.
fweeness 2 years ago 3
I like how George ( I think ) waves to the crowd when the mess up and the crowd drains it out :)
fire139123 2 years ago
@fire139123 Yep, actually in a documentary they said that this was a very problematic song to play live because it has a lot of voices and guitars,
but you see they had their "mehtods" haha
mantoacuatico 2 years ago
they really sucked here and im a huge life long Beatles fan. this life performance was a horrible one compared to there apex in hamburg.
epiphone112689 2 years ago
paul's mic stand kept moving
SupaMario1288 2 years ago
it wasnt their fault the mics and equipment were screwed up
poopyhead002 2 years ago
the beatles would sounded fuking great if they would had had the sound equipment of today!
halonsox 2 years ago 20
true but they sounded awsome for their time
sonofrock97 2 years ago 5
sonofrock97, yes and they managed to sound pretty good in spite of only having 30 watt amplifiers until August 1965 Shea stadium concerts,when only 100 watt amps were made specially for these concerts,plus they had no feedback monitors so they couldn't even hear themselves play & sing,yet they still amazingly managed to sing in sync & in tune with each other anyway,plus all of the screaming.Former Kiss guitarist & producer of The heavy metal Beatles tribute album Butchering The Beatles saw them
4165m 2 years ago
in 1966 & he said he could only hear parts of them playing Paperback Writer & Baby's In Black & he said they sounded amazing.Also on this very site a member posted The Rolling Stones performing The Beatles I Wanna Be You're Man in from late 1963,in The Beatles Anthology video series,& then The Beatles are shown playing it afterwards. It's like going from Rhinestones to diamonds,& The Beatles version as many have pointed out is faster & more rocking.Of Course The Rolling Stones were only playing
4165m 2 years ago
together for somewhat over a year then,The Beatles actually were playing togther including live for several years already,& The Rolling Stones then had the same limited primitive 30 watt amplifiers,& they sounded almost like a bad bar band.Truthfully nobody could sound great on those limited sound systems,but The Beatles live performances from 1963 & 1964 sounded better.I also love The Beatles sound not The Rolling Stones.A guy Steve from Canada said on Artist Facts that he saw The Beatles
4165m 2 years ago
in 1966 & The Stones in 1996 (when the sound systems were a million times better by then!) & he said don't get me wrong The Stones were great,but he said they were no match for The Beatles & he said The Beatles were The Greatest Band Ever! Ozzy Osbourne calls them that too,as does Brian May of Queen,Liasm Gallagher & Bob Kulick and many others etc.
4165m 2 years ago
@halonsox yeah they could sing normally instead of shouting cause of the loud and annoying fan girls
dal3fan88 1 year ago
@halonsox you would sound great if you had some proper english lessons
fulivius 9 months ago
@fulivius hahaha really? come here and teach me TROLL BITCH!
halonsox 2 months ago
@halonsox anytime
fulivius 2 months ago
if that mic was alive i'd be ashamed of it c'mon a beatle is singing to you lol
FRANKZT3R 2 years ago 4
lol, ringo at 1:53, he looks so bored!
john and george singing together is cute, how they keep giggling together :)
rachaelbeatles 2 years ago 2
Poor Paul, stupid mics !
klarolivia 2 years ago 6
you can tell that this is one of their latest concerts.. they started playing terrible with all that noise from the audience.. and look at the faces,, they are like "i don't care, no one is listening anyway.."
NPchannel 2 years ago
Lol at George 1:06
AndywinXp 2 years ago 8
lol everyone went crazy
LedZeppelin644 2 years ago
Oh, those wretched microphones.
GPHemsley 2 years ago