Wow, whoever was driving this thing for the video needs to give it to someone who _can_ drive. The STOCK SX4 hatch can do far better than this "upgraded" one. What the heck is with the wheel lift on the rear tire in turns? Even my stock one with stock OE low pros does not lift, and I haven't installed my Eibach springs yet.
I guess there is a tool that will ruin any car yet still think it's cool. :(
i have a 2010 SX4 came with a kizashi engine 2.4 L and 6 speed and just put little things and i'm on 14.7 without turbo XD that suzuki in the vid is not turbo
And for a jetta I see more jettas at the junk yards than Suzuki and I had a jetta and I know alot of people with vw and there always broken hate those pieces of shits
Its funny how u compare vtech and 5.0 to a little Suzuki of course they're going to beat a little 2.0 come on both those cars were meant to race I worked at a auction and drove bad ass cars and all I know is that u can't compare sports cars to daily drivers come on but I own a Suzuki sx4 sport and it would take a civic vetch on dirt and sand any day on asphalt the civic would win and 5.0 is a quarter mile car can't compare to a stock 2.0 Ive eaten 5.0 in Subaru wrx sti all day long
haha my bone stock sx4 that is lowered on wheels and tires runs better times on a 50 shot....here is a 6 second 0-60 run on an empty bottle (you can hear it cutting out in 4th gear)
@we5leyz u r funny man i watched the video and that rav4 is not stock or just fake video u think every rav4 is that fast? fast like porsche ferrari nissan like that?than every body should buy that shit for 1000$ not a sport car for 10000$ ;) dont think u r smart..
@Djjeanresident What are you talking bout 10k? The new generation V6 Rav4 is a sleeper. Just google Rav4 V6 1/4 mile and read the MotorWeek review. There are tons of reviews from respected Auto Mags. I think you just don't want to believe a Rav4 can be that fast. Stop being so ignorant and look it up dude, it's real and it's fast. It weighs just 3600lbs with 269hp from the V6. Don't knock it til you try it dummy.
@RumbleBee2113 That's because the car wasn't actually prepared for track time. Road Race had allowed Edmonds Inside Line to check out the car, but was supposed to be just for a photo shoot, not for track testing. There were several issues Road race was working on with the car at the time. Doesn't matter now anyways, Suzuki has has the car destroyed since it was built soley to be a SEMA Show Car.
If you are looking for a basic, normal car at a cheap price, Suzuki is the way to go. It has a great warranty, you can pick one up for well under msrp and they are built to last as long as they are driven like you would in the real world. Ever see the Suzuki Swifts on Ebay? Most of the older cars have over 150,000 miles on them, some I have seen with over 200,000 miles! That's not bad for a car with either a 999cc or a 1300 cc engine.
im sorry but i really like this car sounds amazing and for a lil 4x4 its pretty quick the stock motors dont put out that much power so this ones is pretty fast
better do some research . a 2.5 jetta is over a second slower zero to sixty, two seconds slower thru the quarter, thirty feet longer in breaking, I won't go on, but in every way this car is faster than a stock Jetta.
@ducatinova i wish it is, this is a tuned suzuki and you compare this to a stock jetta ... wow no car in this category is going to beat the suzuki if we talk about stock car. Lets put a GTI or GLI in the comparison and you'll see who wins. Of course the Vdub.
I'm sorry but what's the use of tuning this car? I mean yeah it's probably the fastest in its class but for god's sake a FWD accord can beat it even a civic could in a drag
Is this the worst car from Japan ? Coz Suzuki Liana sucked to the core, Top Gear ripped it off several times...... and now they are ripping Chevrolet Optra
Woops, I saw the insideline track video a long time ago and thought they got .98g but it was .91. Woopsie lol. But still thats good, and its better if it gets the .95g you mentioned.
because this was a SEMA show car only, it wasn't meant for or ready for track purposes. It's purpose was to be a show car only for SEMA and promotional events. The suspension set up wasn't tested or tuned for these purposes. Edmonds requested the cars for publication but RRM never wanted them to put tested on the track because they already knew it wasn't set up for such.
@LAVERIJUDA Es porque este carro no fue hecho como para carrera. Esta hecho puramente para los Show's donde Suzuki muestra sus differentes modelos y tambien conceptos. Roar Race y Suzuki N.A. lo prestó a Edmonds Inside Line con la intencion solamente de tomar fotos para un articulo en la revista. Pero nunca se suspone que lo iban a someter a este tipo de pruebas ya que el carro no estaba preparado como para eso. Este carro ya no existe, ya que despues del SEMA Show Tour fue des-assemblado.
Whoever made this thing should be ashamed. Ugly, slow, and the exhaust canisters shake. The only impressive thing is the skidpad rating but a 14.9 second 1/4? My old ford escort zx2 did that, pathetic.
For something that has 300hp & AWD, the 14.9 on the 1/4 is actually quite pathetic.
Just for comparison, it's been proven that STOCK STi's & Evo's (which have similar power levels to what this thing is claimed to have) get mid-13's all day long.
Then you can add these to the growing list of cars that would beat this down the 1/4 and/or around a track:
Oh your comments are sooooo cool. It actually sounds and looks pretty good. I have won many autocrosses in years past, and wouldn't mind giving this little guy a shot. By the way, I own a Suzuki that just happens to RULE. Of course it is the Suzuki B-King bike.
The econobox 4 door performance car insanity fuel by other cars like WRX and Evo is just that;. insane.
What these things do with turbos and a cheap body/interior; a true sports car with 2 doors can do with a V8 and premium grade body/interior.
You can pickup a slightly used but like new Viper GTS coupe for what this thing costs.
With the Viper everyone knows what it is and it gets looks and drools....this thing will 9 of 10 times be mistaken for a base Honda civic with ebay mufflers.
Terrible. Why oh why would you put 50k in parts on a 12k car? Just wasteful and lame. The only thing it did well at all was stop. 108 ft is good.. of course the car only weighs 110 lbs!!!
Those are some pretty sweet numbers for a little Suzuki. I'm not feeling the exterior mods though. I think the addition of the Swift would make their line-up a bit more interesting.
yea but those cars are better cuality cars i prefer to have a car thats reliable not a cheap crap like a suzuki. suzuki bikes like the hayabusa those are awsome but i dont like suzuki cars
@awwsome98 Then you are sadly misinformed. Suzuki SX4 outscored everything in it's catagory in the 2008 and up models, highest reliability, and lowest 5 yr cost of ownership as well as lowest repair cost. Also it has a higher resale value than Toyota Corolla and Nissan Sentra.
Interesting, but it's a little ricey for my tastes. If it didn't have the cosmetic mods, it could be pretty cool, IMO.
And Suzuki should get on the ball and produce a turbocharged model of the SX-4, at a low price point. That would be an awesome seller, I would think, if they undercut the WRX's and Ralliart's price by a few thousand. ~180-210hp, with practicality and AWD, starting around $20-21k, that would be a fun car for the money.
theres no aftermarket for suspension :( so RRM is pretty much by themselves there and tein only makes the coil overs basics which are crap for a track car like this one
what was the point of this video? exhaust system looks like its trying to escape, the thing is rolling like crazy, headlights has no function at all. Ken Block's tuned Sub has better craftsmanship and functionality than this POS. Not to say this car is horrible stock but it looks like it was pieced together with magic markers and rubberbands. On the positive side, I would say this is the opposite end of fine tuning of KB WRX, Hennesey, etc.
Wow, whoever was driving this thing for the video needs to give it to someone who _can_ drive. The STOCK SX4 hatch can do far better than this "upgraded" one. What the heck is with the wheel lift on the rear tire in turns? Even my stock one with stock OE low pros does not lift, and I haven't installed my Eibach springs yet.
I guess there is a tool that will ruin any car yet still think it's cool. :(
gymkhanadog 1 week ago
ROFL that thing BLOWS, i have slips of a 12.9 sec STOCK 201 WRX haahahahhah ur car is slow, you MAY get me in the turns though
trueX5 3 weeks ago
i have a 2010 SX4 came with a kizashi engine 2.4 L and 6 speed and just put little things and i'm on 14.7 without turbo XD that suzuki in the vid is not turbo
Hakiro27 1 month ago
pipes look a little loose...
bkboy747 2 months ago
why didnt they launch it on awd lock? that would of been the money shot!
TaLoCc 2 months ago
@TaLoCc I dont believe that model comes in awd
SnipeyMG 1 month ago
@SnipeyMG It actually does, you can get the AWD in all the SX4 packages, but it's heavy and drags on the entire driveline. It sucks.
gymkhanadog 1 week ago
Lol, poor little Zuk. All that money put into it and barely break 7sec in 0-60.
select20 4 months ago
And for a jetta I see more jettas at the junk yards than Suzuki and I had a jetta and I know alot of people with vw and there always broken hate those pieces of shits
jamesedwardhuse 5 months ago
Its funny how u compare vtech and 5.0 to a little Suzuki of course they're going to beat a little 2.0 come on both those cars were meant to race I worked at a auction and drove bad ass cars and all I know is that u can't compare sports cars to daily drivers come on but I own a Suzuki sx4 sport and it would take a civic vetch on dirt and sand any day on asphalt the civic would win and 5.0 is a quarter mile car can't compare to a stock 2.0 Ive eaten 5.0 in Subaru wrx sti all day long
jamesedwardhuse 5 months ago
14.9 to 1/4 mile with 300 BHP? Thats slowwwwwww
14energy 8 months ago
@14energy
dude when i saw the time i yelled out "thats it!???" so slow indeed!
drgnzadiel101 7 months ago
It's alright for what it is but it look like a rice burner.
princepersia1 9 months ago
6.6 seconds to 60. Lol, sooooo slow.
brapboys503 11 months ago
haha my bone stock sx4 thats lowered with wheels and tires runs a 5.3 second 0-60 on a 50 shot
samsud11 1 year ago
@samsud11 That's not bone stock then.
Baronvontrap 11 months ago
haha my bone stock sx4 that is lowered on wheels and tires runs better times on a 50 shot....here is a 6 second 0-60 run on an empty bottle (you can hear it cutting out in 4th gear)
samsud11 1 year ago
Comment removed
samsud11 1 year ago
It has a nice sound to it!
jacoale 1 year ago
Cool
Taino187 1 year ago
thats fucking slow
DiogoDC123 1 year ago
this thing is riced out
cocx88 1 year ago
@cocx88 since when does original means riced? stfu fagg
DustDevil098 1 year ago
@DustDevil098 ey retard.... i dont think anything on this car is original... so u STFU fagho
cocx88 1 year ago
@DustDevil098 fuck off fagg
DustDevil098 1 year ago
ok ia entiendo entonses solo es estetika o ia q buena onda grax por sakarm de la duda pero = el auto esta de pokamadre grax brou saludos
LAVERIJUDA 1 year ago
lol my rav4 is faster than that
we5leyz 1 year ago
@we5leyz dream on
Djjeanresident 1 year ago
@Djjeanresident no seriously it is, 14.4's 1/4 mile and 5.5-6.0 0-60mph
we5leyz 1 year ago
@we5leyz toyota rav4?no fucking way.. proof it..
Djjeanresident 1 year ago
@Djjeanresident Just youtube rav4 v6 1/4 man, the new generation rav4's have a nasty v6
we5leyz 1 year ago
@we5leyz is this toyota rav4 u talking about or dodge something?
Djjeanresident 1 year ago
@we5leyz u r funny man i watched the video and that rav4 is not stock or just fake video u think every rav4 is that fast? fast like porsche ferrari nissan like that?than every body should buy that shit for 1000$ not a sport car for 10000$ ;) dont think u r smart..
Djjeanresident 1 year ago
@Djjeanresident What are you talking bout 10k? The new generation V6 Rav4 is a sleeper. Just google Rav4 V6 1/4 mile and read the MotorWeek review. There are tons of reviews from respected Auto Mags. I think you just don't want to believe a Rav4 can be that fast. Stop being so ignorant and look it up dude, it's real and it's fast. It weighs just 3600lbs with 269hp from the V6. Don't knock it til you try it dummy.
we5leyz 1 year ago
@we5leyz i think this car has too much mods to be such slow. i love how it looks but i think is slow for all the money invested on it.
jackthereapper15 1 year ago
It sounds meaty if you get what I mean
blown0883 1 year ago
I'd buy an older Fit anyday over this...
apexdna 1 year ago
idk it looks nice and all but on tht take off it seems pre slow and even for a front wheel drive what a weak burnout
RumbleBee2113 1 year ago
@RumbleBee2113 That's because the car wasn't actually prepared for track time. Road Race had allowed Edmonds Inside Line to check out the car, but was supposed to be just for a photo shoot, not for track testing. There were several issues Road race was working on with the car at the time. Doesn't matter now anyways, Suzuki has has the car destroyed since it was built soley to be a SEMA Show Car.
racers115 1 year ago
If you are looking for a basic, normal car at a cheap price, Suzuki is the way to go. It has a great warranty, you can pick one up for well under msrp and they are built to last as long as they are driven like you would in the real world. Ever see the Suzuki Swifts on Ebay? Most of the older cars have over 150,000 miles on them, some I have seen with over 200,000 miles! That's not bad for a car with either a 999cc or a 1300 cc engine.
Umaxen 1 year ago 2
It kinda sounds like a decked out lawn mower.
86bmw325i 1 year ago
im sorry but i really like this car sounds amazing and for a lil 4x4 its pretty quick the stock motors dont put out that much power so this ones is pretty fast
shonzy7 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sucks...
eknito007 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what's with the painted headlights? they look ugly, but it wouldn't really matter. the car is already butt ugly.
1250796560 2 years ago
This is a ricer. If you could get one without all the crap then cool. And .96G FWD, insane!
koukicrisp 2 years ago
I'd bet my credit card number that none of you has ever driven one of those.
Bagabagab 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Don't bet too much i just might end up takin your number and getting some dough.
Ive driven one and it actually sucked asshole.
stregaboys44 2 years ago
I've driven one, and I am seriously thinking of buying one now.
Everyone has his opinion.
Bagabagab 2 years ago 19
This comment has received too many negative votes show
kinda dissapointing that this automaker also makes rallycars.
JcmMagNoo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
RICE BURNER LOL.
Check out how the exhausts vibrate when the car fuckin lifts off thats funny shit LOL.
stregaboys44 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its ready to drop out lol. my car does better than that.
JcmMagNoo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yea man my VTEC smokes anything corvettes farraris you name it shit nicca.
stregaboys44 2 years ago
Really? That's nothing. When nobody's looking, my VTEC transforms into a giant robot from the planet Cybertron!
Skyline626 2 years ago
That happens with many cars.
StuRaz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Really it doesn't happen on my genesis coupe haha i think this car is piece period. So fuck off tool.
stregaboys44 2 years ago
Christ, it wasn't meant as an insult, calm down. If you look at the exhaust on many cars when doing a full throttle launch many of them vibrate.
StuRaz 2 years ago
all of them do haha specially an awd car
shonzy7 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this car is bull shit
1993ferdi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hell yeah it is bull shit
1992rasul 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
suzuki makes the biggest piece of shit cars.. it will fall apart at 20,000
PunchinBabies 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a waste of money ! my n/a 420a avenger would eat this thing
Red97Avenger 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
love smokin this imports n my 5.0
PinpinKALI559 2 years ago
better do some research . a 2.5 jetta is over a second slower zero to sixty, two seconds slower thru the quarter, thirty feet longer in breaking, I won't go on, but in every way this car is faster than a stock Jetta.
ducatinova 2 years ago 8
@ducatinova i wish it is, this is a tuned suzuki and you compare this to a stock jetta ... wow no car in this category is going to beat the suzuki if we talk about stock car. Lets put a GTI or GLI in the comparison and you'll see who wins. Of course the Vdub.
maxou5757 1 year ago
downshift you fucking retard
GEARHEADGUY92 2 years ago
Seems you people are still new to Suzuki..get real..
ElDiablo458 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how does this video have 4 stars? this car performs terribly, but at least has the paint to match
TagsRover 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shit my stock 07 vw jetta 2.5 is faster than that all the way around
biggdaddy2001 2 years ago
A 14.9 1/4 mi. in a 2.5 Jetta? C'mon now! I wouldn't go lining up w/ one just yet! :D
mykulc 2 years ago
no it's not
nfusco618 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ew. I think I just threw up a little.
civiIian 2 years ago
slow, wheelhop, dual exhaust, fail.
jwuonog 2 years ago
YEA!!!!! nobody has shit on suzuki now!!! ha ha
shauncharger 2 years ago
I think it actually looks nice!
But seems to be kinda disappointing when pushed to the limits :-|
Slow and noisy...
LoZioFBV 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
suzuki's speciality is ugly cars;)
vvheee 2 years ago
wow what a waste of money and time.....
floyd11123 2 years ago
I'm sorry but what's the use of tuning this car? I mean yeah it's probably the fastest in its class but for god's sake a FWD accord can beat it even a civic could in a drag
supitstom 2 years ago
man my first car (cavalier) looks faster off the line than that lmao
egotrippen216bw 2 years ago
Is this the worst car from Japan ? Coz Suzuki Liana sucked to the core, Top Gear ripped it off several times...... and now they are ripping Chevrolet Optra
mshl8188 2 years ago
that car makes TOOOO much noise for the performance numbers that it has
mellowdalyricist 2 years ago
hahaha that shit hits 3 wheel motion
HJP1100 2 years ago
looks nice but not that safe to drive
leviathan6144 2 years ago
at 0:29, nice shot. photography-wise, that shot rocks!
N6600 2 years ago
This thing looks like a freaking Scion xA.
supitstom 2 years ago
you are calling scion xa ugly indirectly.......
mshl8188 2 years ago
You know what so be it xA's are ugly anyways
supitstom 2 years ago
I partially agree with you.
mshl8188 2 years ago
what is rollout? at what speed is considered rollout?
coboisarapatanas 2 years ago
rear-view mirrors are too long, and mufflers shake too much.other than that i think i like it. probly. could use suspension tweak.
bigsevo 2 years ago
it looks like it's gonna roll over on the skidpad!
catlopy47cp 2 years ago
Woops, I saw the insideline track video a long time ago and thought they got .98g but it was .91. Woopsie lol. But still thats good, and its better if it gets the .95g you mentioned.
gunzkevin 2 years ago
ah the new rip off the of the mazda3 hatch?
XenoRacing 2 years ago
it dont look like a mazda 3 hatch back at all .. mazda look much better . this is garbage
carlosjavierPR 2 years ago
oh cool, a bigger smart car with mods XD
fumoyou 2 years ago
Good acceleration. Great skid-pad and braking, but why are the slalom numbers so poor?
JaySee5 2 years ago
because this was a SEMA show car only, it wasn't meant for or ready for track purposes. It's purpose was to be a show car only for SEMA and promotional events. The suspension set up wasn't tested or tuned for these purposes. Edmonds requested the cars for publication but RRM never wanted them to put tested on the track because they already knew it wasn't set up for such.
wppdoes 2 years ago 15
looks like Mexican handywork :-)
NOREGON369 2 years ago
i agree. i would never put this much time and money into this shit. as a matter of fact watching this is putting to much time in it.
007johnie 2 years ago
thats cold
Scorp969 2 years ago
true xd the pipes are shaking
GOLMINER2 2 years ago
no es por ser mierrda pero tiene un despegue muy pendejo
LAVERIJUDA 2 years ago
@LAVERIJUDA Es porque este carro no fue hecho como para carrera. Esta hecho puramente para los Show's donde Suzuki muestra sus differentes modelos y tambien conceptos. Roar Race y Suzuki N.A. lo prestó a Edmonds Inside Line con la intencion solamente de tomar fotos para un articulo en la revista. Pero nunca se suspone que lo iban a someter a este tipo de pruebas ya que el carro no estaba preparado como para eso. Este carro ya no existe, ya que despues del SEMA Show Tour fue des-assemblado.
racers115 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Zux at this XD
rickmec 2 years ago
You people are morons, this car rocks ass. How good is your car at rallying?
MisterHolaMan 2 years ago
Haha I'd rock it. Sounds faster than it is but atleast it corners well.
mxt2s 2 years ago
that is some bull shit its a piece of shit
snwbordr002 2 years ago
if your gonna build a fast road going car, why are you using a suzuki sx4?
phiwooddothis 2 years ago
okay... i like tuned cars but this is HORRIBLE!
JimmyUnlimit3d 2 years ago
Whoever made this thing should be ashamed. Ugly, slow, and the exhaust canisters shake. The only impressive thing is the skidpad rating but a 14.9 second 1/4? My old ford escort zx2 did that, pathetic.
swass001 2 years ago
What I don't get is, why do people hate certain cars? A good car is a good car. Simple.
100littlecurses 2 years ago
Asians everywhere are drooling. I wouldn't drive this piece of shit. I;d take a bus pass over it.
rbloch23 2 years ago
these car tuners suck, is that the best they could get out the SX-4?
ryftcode 2 years ago
According to motortrend, the taurus gets a 7 second 0-60. Not much slower than this thing, and the taurus doesn't sound, or look as stupid.
gunzkevin 2 years ago
The mustang with track pack gets .98g
gunzkevin 2 years ago
this car is disgusting......
rebelnumba2 2 years ago
For something that has 300hp & AWD, the 14.9 on the 1/4 is actually quite pathetic.
Just for comparison, it's been proven that STOCK STi's & Evo's (which have similar power levels to what this thing is claimed to have) get mid-13's all day long.
Then you can add these to the growing list of cars that would beat this down the 1/4 and/or around a track:
Civic Type R (JDM or Euro version)
Lancer Ralliart
Astra VXR
Focus RS.
MafiaboysWorld 2 years ago
Oh your comments are sooooo cool. It actually sounds and looks pretty good. I have won many autocrosses in years past, and wouldn't mind giving this little guy a shot. By the way, I own a Suzuki that just happens to RULE. Of course it is the Suzuki B-King bike.
OldWriter205 2 years ago
i bet after they tested it, it fell apart
ACEKILLAZZ 2 years ago
It's still slow as shit and ugly
drz400e332 2 years ago
this car really sucks
nwonknu8 2 years ago
this car sounds a lot better then it performs
wilsonweed123 2 years ago 2
i would have to disagree... because it sounds AND performs like shit lol.
ossBASHA 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a waste of money to tune that
908NJSKATE 2 years ago
this thing is a piece of junk! Did you see the body roll in the slalom and brake tests? I wouldn't give RRM a dime to work on a car.
twolf422 2 years ago
Not bad for a taxi!
tven99 2 years ago
look at the exhaust pipes at 0:43 ... japanese quality
burner2oo7 2 years ago
i'd say exactly the same. Everything under the car is bouncing lol
andrersx 2 years ago
how much... cause i wouldn't pay a cent over 22,000 k for this
champ1193 2 years ago
i would take the camry if it was that much!
tven99 2 years ago
The exhaust needs more restraint. It's dancing all the way XD
VeeKain 2 years ago
its just crap really isnt it.
mrxbrightside 2 years ago
0-60 in 6.9 almost 7 seconds but 1/4 mile in 14s? Talk about turbo lag!
MOPARfulSRT4 2 years ago
yo...beyonce had some of the best skidd marks of all time......100ft. plus....60-0..lol
ricetry97 2 years ago
The econobox 4 door performance car insanity fuel by other cars like WRX and Evo is just that;. insane.
What these things do with turbos and a cheap body/interior; a true sports car with 2 doors can do with a V8 and premium grade body/interior.
You can pickup a slightly used but like new Viper GTS coupe for what this thing costs.
With the Viper everyone knows what it is and it gets looks and drools....this thing will 9 of 10 times be mistaken for a base Honda civic with ebay mufflers.
texan176 2 years ago
Terrible. Why oh why would you put 50k in parts on a 12k car? Just wasteful and lame. The only thing it did well at all was stop. 108 ft is good.. of course the car only weighs 110 lbs!!!
allteeth 2 years ago
yea me too wonder and after all those works , 0-60 still hit at 6+ secs . *sigh*
zenom88 2 years ago
@allteeth this car weighs more than 3000 lbs
jr40490 1 year ago
Not Bad, Not Bad
maserati199 2 years ago
Pretty good numbers in handling and braking
straightline..it's alright I guess
Something needs to be done about those exhausts though, they move around wayy too much
isthissnfree 2 years ago
Handling is good, braking is good, sound is good...but it's a sluggish piece of shit in a straight line. Therefore, no thanks.
wildbloodydragon 2 years ago
is it me or does this thing sound like a go kart?
310Sole 2 years ago
Its you
MatsNorway 2 years ago
lol
310Sole 2 years ago
we need more powa!! and its already known this engines can handle the power...
wolfe787 2 years ago
Those are some pretty sweet numbers for a little Suzuki. I'm not feeling the exterior mods though. I think the addition of the Swift would make their line-up a bit more interesting.
marthatesyou 2 years ago
why would u waste money on a hopeless SX-4? seriously...
awwsome98 2 years ago
becuase its faster than the yaris, the fit, and the versa, and the corolla and its way cheaper than all of those
wolfe787 2 years ago 2
yea but those cars are better cuality cars i prefer to have a car thats reliable not a cheap crap like a suzuki. suzuki bikes like the hayabusa those are awsome but i dont like suzuki cars
awwsome98 2 years ago
@awwsome98 Then you are sadly misinformed. Suzuki SX4 outscored everything in it's catagory in the 2008 and up models, highest reliability, and lowest 5 yr cost of ownership as well as lowest repair cost. Also it has a higher resale value than Toyota Corolla and Nissan Sentra.
hb4fun1 1 year ago 4
Interesting, but it's a little ricey for my tastes. If it didn't have the cosmetic mods, it could be pretty cool, IMO.
And Suzuki should get on the ball and produce a turbocharged model of the SX-4, at a low price point. That would be an awesome seller, I would think, if they undercut the WRX's and Ralliart's price by a few thousand. ~180-210hp, with practicality and AWD, starting around $20-21k, that would be a fun car for the money.
cherrybomb1493 2 years ago
boo, my all motor integra is faster than this. this is worse than being seen in a dodge neon.
dsmdeegen 2 years ago
okok....my all motor prius is faster than ur integra...
bennychan723 2 years ago
No Thanks
chrisw40 2 years ago 2
96g skidpad numbers are phenomenal on a front wheel driven car
tontonpacute 2 years ago 2
i think its awd bro
pcasso87 2 years ago
lol
sick sidz aswell bro
888berg 2 years ago
wow 0.96 g's on the skid pad is amazing... too bad it turns into a tripod
StalePhish 2 years ago
theres no aftermarket for suspension :( so RRM is pretty much by themselves there and tein only makes the coil overs basics which are crap for a track car like this one
wolfe787 2 years ago
A proper FWD hot hatch is supposed to roll on 3 wheels. Check out Civic Type Rs, Mk1 GTi, etc.
JaySee5 2 years ago
rice
konascrap888 2 years ago
what was the point of this video? exhaust system looks like its trying to escape, the thing is rolling like crazy, headlights has no function at all. Ken Block's tuned Sub has better craftsmanship and functionality than this POS. Not to say this car is horrible stock but it looks like it was pieced together with magic markers and rubberbands. On the positive side, I would say this is the opposite end of fine tuning of KB WRX, Hennesey, etc.
mp5wes 2 years ago
That thing has no hangers on the exhaust!! What the hell? If I have a car I don't want the exhaust rattling off!
ToxicNONESENSE94 2 years ago
0-60 in 6.9 sec.? Pretty disappointing for an SX4 with 300 hp.
A7WFG 2 years ago 2
all show and no go but its handles well
IDannyxss 2 years ago
dam that is slow, n u cant see at night
coolsun888 2 years ago
(barf)
Pajapajin 2 years ago
look at the exaust shake when he takes off
fattygetsowned 2 years ago
the car looks like its going to fall apart =(
FallOutBoyx530 2 years ago 6
I always liked the sound of a properly tuned i4.
dude486 2 years ago
Why?
Billy4202 2 years ago
around the skidpad it sounds like a lawn mower.
flyjake 2 years ago 2
SX-4 Zuk = sux 4 you
ndyt 2 years ago 2
That bouncing tail pipe makes the car look so really cheap.
spiceylawnmower 2 years ago 2
yeh it does and too much body roll, when hard braking loud knock when it stops etc could be done alot better
gengiz 2 years ago
it turnout some good numbers.
way to go Suzuki
Cold11Fire 2 years ago
They really need to go back to the drawing board and work on the suspension.
nanzioboy 2 years ago 2
i don't get this
jonthesailorman 2 years ago 2
Disgusting. Why would you give the headlights the same color, and why do people 'enjoy' the loud sound of an ugly, fucked-out car?
TerryFilming 2 years ago
Mexican would love that thing where i live
natra911 2 years ago
Same here. They do it to their civics all the time
SLK350fast 2 years ago
haha same here
anthonyrocksworldz 2 years ago