Added: 2 years ago
From: InsideLineVideo
Views: 47,822
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (262)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow, whoever was driving this thing for the video needs to give it to someone who _can_ drive. The STOCK SX4 hatch can do far better than this "upgraded" one. What the heck is with the wheel lift on the rear tire in turns? Even my stock one with stock OE low pros does not lift, and I haven't installed my Eibach springs yet.

    I guess there is a tool that will ruin any car yet still think it's cool. :(

  • ROFL that thing BLOWS, i have slips of a 12.9 sec STOCK 201 WRX haahahahhah ur car is slow, you MAY get me in the turns though

  • i have a 2010 SX4 came with a kizashi engine 2.4 L and 6 speed and just put little things and i'm on 14.7 without turbo XD that suzuki in the vid is not turbo

  • pipes look a little loose...

  • why didnt they launch it on awd lock? that would of been the money shot!

  • @TaLoCc I dont believe that model comes in awd

  • @SnipeyMG It actually does, you can get the AWD in all the SX4 packages, but it's heavy and drags on the entire driveline. It sucks.

  • Lol, poor little Zuk. All that money put into it and barely break 7sec in 0-60.

  • And for a jetta I see more jettas at the junk yards than Suzuki and I had a jetta and I know alot of people with vw and there always broken hate those pieces of shits

  • Its funny how u compare vtech and 5.0 to a little Suzuki of course they're going to beat a little 2.0 come on both those cars were meant to race I worked at a auction and drove bad ass cars and all I know is that u can't compare sports cars to daily drivers come on but I own a Suzuki sx4 sport and it would take a civic vetch on dirt and sand any day on asphalt the civic would win and 5.0 is a quarter mile car can't compare to a stock 2.0 Ive eaten 5.0 in Subaru wrx sti all day long

  • 14.9 to 1/4 mile with 300 BHP? Thats slowwwwwww

  • @14energy

    dude when i saw the time i yelled out "thats it!???" so slow indeed!

  • It's alright for what it is but it look like a rice burner.

  • 6.6 seconds to 60. Lol, sooooo slow.

  • haha my bone stock sx4 thats lowered with wheels and tires runs a 5.3 second 0-60 on a 50 shot

  • @samsud11 That's not bone stock then.

  • haha my bone stock sx4 that is lowered on wheels and tires runs better times on a 50 shot....here is a 6 second 0-60 run on an empty bottle (you can hear it cutting out in 4th gear)

  • Comment removed

  • It has a nice sound to it!

  • Cool

  • thats fucking slow

  • this thing is riced out

  • @cocx88 since when does original means riced? stfu fagg

  • @DustDevil098 ey retard.... i dont think anything on this car is original... so u STFU fagho

  • @DustDevil098 fuck off fagg

  • ok ia entiendo entonses solo es estetika o ia q buena onda grax por sakarm de la duda pero = el auto esta de pokamadre grax brou saludos

  • lol my rav4 is faster than that

  • @we5leyz dream on

  • @Djjeanresident no seriously it is, 14.4's 1/4 mile and 5.5-6.0 0-60mph

  • @we5leyz toyota rav4?no fucking way.. proof it..

  • @Djjeanresident Just youtube rav4 v6 1/4 man, the new generation rav4's have a nasty v6

  • @we5leyz is this toyota rav4 u talking about or dodge something?

  • @we5leyz u r funny man i watched the video and that rav4 is not stock or just fake video u think every rav4 is that fast? fast like porsche ferrari nissan like that?than every body should buy that shit for 1000$ not a sport car for 10000$ ;) dont think u r smart..

  • @Djjeanresident What are you talking bout 10k? The new generation V6 Rav4 is a sleeper. Just google Rav4 V6 1/4 mile and read the MotorWeek review. There are tons of reviews from respected Auto Mags. I think you just don't want to believe a Rav4 can be that fast. Stop being so ignorant and look it up dude, it's real and it's fast. It weighs just 3600lbs with 269hp from the V6. Don't knock it til you try it dummy.

  • @we5leyz i think this car has too much mods to be such slow. i love how it looks but i think is slow for all the money invested on it.

  • It sounds meaty if you get what I mean

  • I'd buy an older Fit anyday over this...

  • idk it looks nice and all but on tht take off it seems pre slow and even for a front wheel drive what a weak burnout

  • @RumbleBee2113 That's because the car wasn't actually prepared for track time. Road Race had allowed Edmonds Inside Line to check out the car, but was supposed to be just for a photo shoot, not for track testing. There were several issues Road race was working on with the car at the time. Doesn't matter now anyways, Suzuki has has the car destroyed since it was built soley to be a SEMA Show Car.

  • If you are looking for a basic, normal car at a cheap price, Suzuki is the way to go. It has a great warranty, you can pick one up for well under msrp and they are built to last as long as they are driven like you would in the real world. Ever see the Suzuki Swifts on Ebay? Most of the older cars have over 150,000 miles on them, some I have seen with over 200,000 miles! That's not bad for a car with either a 999cc or a 1300 cc engine.

  • It kinda sounds like a decked out lawn mower.

  • im sorry but i really like this car sounds amazing and for a lil 4x4 its pretty quick the stock motors dont put out that much power so this ones is pretty fast

  • This is a ricer. If you could get one without all the crap then cool. And .96G FWD, insane!

  • I'd bet my credit card number that none of you has ever driven one of those.

  • I've driven one, and I am seriously thinking of buying one now.

    Everyone has his opinion.

  • Really? That's nothing. When nobody's looking, my VTEC transforms into a giant robot from the planet Cybertron!

  • That happens with many cars.

  • Christ, it wasn't meant as an insult, calm down. If you look at the exhaust on many cars when doing a full throttle launch many of them vibrate.

  • all of them do haha specially an awd car

  • better do some research . a 2.5 jetta is over a second slower zero to sixty, two seconds slower thru the quarter, thirty feet longer in breaking, I won't go on, but in every way this car is faster than a stock Jetta.

  • @ducatinova i wish it is, this is a tuned suzuki and you compare this to a stock jetta ... wow no car in this category is going to beat the suzuki if we talk about stock car. Lets put a GTI or GLI in the comparison and you'll see who wins. Of course the Vdub.

  • downshift you fucking retard

  • Seems you people are still new to Suzuki..get real..

  • A 14.9 1/4 mi. in a 2.5 Jetta? C'mon now! I wouldn't go lining up w/ one just yet! :D

  • no it's not

  • slow, wheelhop, dual exhaust, fail.

  • YEA!!!!! nobody has shit on suzuki now!!! ha ha

  • I think it actually looks nice!

    But seems to be kinda disappointing when pushed to the limits :-|

    Slow and noisy...

  • wow what a waste of money and time.....

  • I'm sorry but what's the use of tuning this car? I mean yeah it's probably the fastest in its class but for god's sake a FWD accord can beat it even a civic could in a drag

  • man my first car (cavalier) looks faster off the line than that lmao

  • Is this the worst car from Japan ? Coz Suzuki Liana sucked to the core, Top Gear ripped it off several times...... and now they are ripping Chevrolet Optra

  • that car makes TOOOO much noise for the performance numbers that it has

  • hahaha that shit hits 3 wheel motion

  • looks nice but not that safe to drive

  • at 0:29, nice shot. photography-wise, that shot rocks!

  • This thing looks like a freaking Scion xA.

  • you are calling scion xa ugly indirectly.......

  • You know what so be it xA's are ugly anyways

  • I partially agree with you.

  • what is rollout? at what speed is considered rollout?

  • rear-view mirrors are too long, and mufflers shake too much.other than that i think i like it. probly. could use suspension tweak.

  • it looks like it's gonna roll over on the skidpad!

  • Woops, I saw the insideline track video a long time ago and thought they got .98g but it was .91. Woopsie lol. But still thats good, and its better if it gets the .95g you mentioned.

  • ah the new rip off the of the mazda3 hatch?

  • it dont look like a mazda 3 hatch back at all .. mazda look much better . this is garbage

  • oh cool, a bigger smart car with mods XD

  • Good acceleration. Great skid-pad and braking, but why are the slalom numbers so poor?

  • because this was a SEMA show car only, it wasn't meant for or ready for track purposes. It's purpose was to be a show car only for SEMA and promotional events. The suspension set up wasn't tested or tuned for these purposes. Edmonds requested the cars for publication but RRM never wanted them to put tested on the track because they already knew it wasn't set up for such.

  • looks like Mexican handywork :-)

  • i agree. i would never put this much time and money into this shit. as a matter of fact watching this is putting to much time in it.

  • thats cold

  • true xd the pipes are shaking

  • no es por ser mierrda pero tiene un despegue muy pendejo

  • @LAVERIJUDA Es porque este carro no fue hecho como para carrera. Esta hecho puramente para los Show's donde Suzuki muestra sus differentes modelos y tambien conceptos. Roar Race y Suzuki N.A. lo prestó a Edmonds Inside Line con la intencion solamente de tomar fotos para un articulo en la revista. Pero nunca se suspone que lo iban a someter a este tipo de pruebas ya que el carro no estaba preparado como para eso. Este carro ya no existe, ya que despues del SEMA Show Tour fue des-assemblado.

  • You people are morons, this car rocks ass. How good is your car at rallying?

  • Haha I'd rock it. Sounds faster than it is but atleast it corners well.

  • that is some bull shit its a piece of shit

  • if your gonna build a fast road going car, why are you using a suzuki sx4?

  • okay... i like tuned cars but this is HORRIBLE!

  • Whoever made this thing should be ashamed. Ugly, slow, and the exhaust canisters shake. The only impressive thing is the skidpad rating but a 14.9 second 1/4? My old ford escort zx2 did that, pathetic.

  • What I don't get is, why do people hate certain cars? A good car is a good car. Simple.

  • Asians everywhere are drooling. I wouldn't drive this piece of shit. I;d take a bus pass over it.

  • these car tuners suck, is that the best they could get out the SX-4?

  • According to motortrend, the taurus gets a 7 second 0-60. Not much slower than this thing, and the taurus doesn't sound, or look as stupid.

  • The mustang with track pack gets .98g

  • this car is disgusting......

  • For something that has 300hp & AWD, the 14.9 on the 1/4 is actually quite pathetic.

    Just for comparison, it's been proven that STOCK STi's & Evo's (which have similar power levels to what this thing is claimed to have) get mid-13's all day long.

    Then you can add these to the growing list of cars that would beat this down the 1/4 and/or around a track:

    Civic Type R (JDM or Euro version)

    Lancer Ralliart

    Astra VXR

    Focus RS.

  • Oh your comments are sooooo cool. It actually sounds and looks pretty good. I have won many autocrosses in years past, and wouldn't mind giving this little guy a shot. By the way, I own a Suzuki that just happens to RULE. Of course it is the Suzuki B-King bike.

  • i bet after they tested it, it fell apart

  • It's still slow as shit and ugly

  • this car really sucks

  • this car sounds a lot better then it performs

  • i would have to disagree... because it sounds AND performs like shit lol.

  • this thing is a piece of junk! Did you see the body roll in the slalom and brake tests? I wouldn't give RRM a dime to work on a car.

  • Not bad for a taxi!

  • look at the exhaust pipes at 0:43 ... japanese quality

  • i'd say exactly the same. Everything under the car is bouncing lol

  • how much... cause i wouldn't pay a cent over 22,000 k for this

  • i would take the camry if it was that much!

  • The exhaust needs more restraint. It's dancing all the way XD

  • its just crap really isnt it.

  • 0-60 in 6.9 almost 7 seconds but 1/4 mile in 14s? Talk about turbo lag!

  • yo...beyonce had some of the best skidd marks of all time......100ft. plus....60-0..lol

  • The econobox 4 door performance car insanity fuel by other cars like WRX and Evo is just that;. insane.

    What these things do with turbos and a cheap body/interior; a true sports car with 2 doors can do with a V8 and premium grade body/interior.

    You can pickup a slightly used but like new Viper GTS coupe for what this thing costs.

    With the Viper everyone knows what it is and it gets looks and drools....this thing will 9 of 10 times be mistaken for a base Honda civic with ebay mufflers.

  • Terrible. Why oh why would you put 50k in parts on a 12k car? Just wasteful and lame. The only thing it did well at all was stop. 108 ft is good.. of course the car only weighs 110 lbs!!!

  • yea me too wonder and after all those works , 0-60 still hit at 6+ secs . *sigh*

  • @allteeth this car weighs more than 3000 lbs

  • Not Bad, Not Bad

  • Pretty good numbers in handling and braking

    straightline..it's alright I guess

    Something needs to be done about those exhausts though, they move around wayy too much

  • Handling is good, braking is good, sound is good...but it's a sluggish piece of shit in a straight line. Therefore, no thanks.

  • is it me or does this thing sound like a go kart?

  • Its you

  • lol

  • we need more powa!! and its already known this engines can handle the power...

  • Those are some pretty sweet numbers for a little Suzuki. I'm not feeling the exterior mods though. I think the addition of the Swift would make their line-up a bit more interesting.

  • why would u waste money on a hopeless SX-4? seriously...

  • becuase its faster than the yaris, the fit, and the versa, and the corolla and its way cheaper than all of those

  • yea but those cars are better cuality cars i prefer to have a car thats reliable not a cheap crap like a suzuki. suzuki bikes like the hayabusa those are awsome but i dont like suzuki cars

  • @awwsome98 Then you are sadly misinformed. Suzuki SX4 outscored everything in it's catagory in the 2008 and up models, highest reliability, and lowest 5 yr cost of ownership as well as lowest repair cost. Also it has a higher resale value than Toyota Corolla and Nissan Sentra.

  • Interesting, but it's a little ricey for my tastes. If it didn't have the cosmetic mods, it could be pretty cool, IMO.

    And Suzuki should get on the ball and produce a turbocharged model of the SX-4, at a low price point. That would be an awesome seller, I would think, if they undercut the WRX's and Ralliart's price by a few thousand. ~180-210hp, with practicality and AWD, starting around $20-21k, that would be a fun car for the money.

  • boo, my all motor integra is faster than this. this is worse than being seen in a dodge neon.

  • okok....my all motor prius is faster than ur integra...

  • No Thanks

  • 96g skidpad numbers are phenomenal on a front wheel driven car

  • i think its awd bro

  • lol

    sick sidz aswell bro

  • wow 0.96 g's on the skid pad is amazing... too bad it turns into a tripod

  • theres no aftermarket for suspension :( so RRM is pretty much by themselves there and tein only makes the coil overs basics which are crap for a track car like this one

  • A proper FWD hot hatch is supposed to roll on 3 wheels. Check out Civic Type Rs, Mk1 GTi, etc.

  • rice

  • what was the point of this video? exhaust system looks like its trying to escape, the thing is rolling like crazy, headlights has no function at all. Ken Block's tuned Sub has better craftsmanship and functionality than this POS. Not to say this car is horrible stock but it looks like it was pieced together with magic markers and rubberbands. On the positive side, I would say this is the opposite end of fine tuning of KB WRX, Hennesey, etc.

  • That thing has no hangers on the exhaust!! What the hell? If I have a car I don't want the exhaust rattling off!

  • 0-60 in 6.9 sec.? Pretty disappointing for an SX4 with 300 hp.

  • all show and no go but its handles well

  • dam that is slow, n u cant see at night

  • (barf)

  • look at the exaust shake when he takes off

  • the car looks like its going to fall apart =(

  • I always liked the sound of a properly tuned i4.

  • Why?

  • around the skidpad it sounds like a lawn mower.

  • SX-4 Zuk = sux 4 you

  • That bouncing tail pipe makes the car look so really cheap.

  • yeh it does and too much body roll, when hard braking loud knock when it stops etc could be done alot better

  • it turnout some good numbers.

    way to go Suzuki

  • They really need to go back to the drawing board and work on the suspension.

  • i don't get this

  • Disgusting. Why would you give the headlights the same color, and why do people 'enjoy' the loud sound of an ugly, fucked-out car?

  • Mexican would love that thing where i live

  • Same here. They do it to their civics all the time

  • haha same here