Added: 4 years ago
From: BBC
Views: 46,324
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (549)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dan Snow is literally so attractive

  • Do you know that yesterday an islander born in Malvinas, son of an islander who fought in the conflict of 1982, became an Argentine citizen? He was born in the islands in 1968 and he applied for the argentine nationality since he is an argentine citizen like all islanders. One day we will celebrate all together.

  • Dan is so sexy

  • NI SI QUIERA ES SU CONTIENENTE, ¬¬

  • ISLAS MALVINAS ARGENTINAS

  • you will be a muslim country in 20 years. this is the solution. they will buy malvinas. and finish

  • MALVINAS ARGENTINAS , KOSOVO ES SERBIA Y MEXICO ES DE ESTADOS UNIDOS.

  • And the self determination of the people is also a pointy subject. It's not an automatic thing. You have many cases around the world, they are all complicated issues. The islanders, same as irish protestants wouldn't be there to prefer british sovereignty if the british wouldn't have taken the islands (flaklands or irish) from the previous owners. They call it separatism or something like that when they want it to look bad, and self determination when they want it to appear as a good thing.

  • @maskedmelodymakers

    The Republic of Ireland respects self-determination in Northern Ireland.

  • I COMPLETELY agree with Arminevh. Really, the man is speaking for me. It's all very relative. I don't like the use of the military Argentina made to recover the islands in 1982. Nor do I like British Empire using its military force to conquer (and sometimes colonize) the places in the world they fancy. Then also is the fact that Argentina's government at the time wasn't chosen by the people, so the people is not to blame so directly for 1982. But Argentina's claim is right. Same as Spain's.

  • It's a pity the BBC can't be bothered to do their research before wasting our licence fee on these sort of programmes. Dan Snow: the Tornado F3 is an INTERCEPTOR not a f'king fighter-bomber. Furthermore, to slow the aircraft down he would LOWER the flaps, not put them up, you stupid posh twat. Just cos daddy got a job in TV doesn't mean you're any good at it (and nor is he for that matter).Well done the BBC - another potentially great programme ruined by your utter shit-ness.

  • @MikeOxsmells dude lame, stop being so pedantic.. know one really cares. It's 80% the same.. it's not like they couldn't be converted easily to carry ground attack ordnance. He probabaly meant down but oh I suppose in your perfect world you never make any mistakes. Stupid troll.

  • @spitfir3ace In a perfect world, we'd have something called 'spell checker' to check for stupid spellings, then ' know one' would look like a dumb-ass. Oh, we do? Maybe some people are 'probabaly' just too dumb to use it.

  • Britain yesterday was an empire, and are now a U.S. colony XD

  • @PatagonianCurse and ur a ediot

  • @mikeyutj1 "ediot"??? buy a book jajajaja

  • we british are peaceful people

  • I would like to visit te falklands sometime aswell as Ascension Island. Rule Britannia

  • i think you should invade again,this time it will not take 70 plus days to deal with you,you would not even land.We have Typhoon fighter jets there-The MOST ADVANCED warplane in the world.We have Nuclear powered subs a 1,000 troops and over 30 tanks so bring it on. Your airforce is still largely the same as you had in 1982 pathetic!!.We are more advanced than ever and you may even get HMS Daring to meet you(the most advanced warship in the world!!You could never attack again your a joke.

  • the F-22 Raptor is the most advanced warplane in the world. it's also stealthy, the Typhoon is not

  • I think its time to invade again the Falklands..........I dont see other option.

  • Invasion of Argentine tourists would be acceptable I think... This could be beneficial for both sides, although some people do not like tourists ;)

  • I see another option; the Argentinians can respect the fundamental right of the Falklanders to determine their own sovereignty.

  • @Medeasbiggestfan Yeah, that's the British Empire setting the example... Go tell the Irish that kind of thing, or any part of the ex-Empire. What about Gibraltar? It's not natural. You cannot fill a place with brits, mildly wash their heads through generations and then claim the territory is yours just because "the people there wants it so". It's called colonialism. It's the irish troubles, it's the falklands, it's not really ok. Besides the whole separatism thing is rather delicate.

  • @maskedmelodymakers The Irish respect freedom and democracy, I think it's time for the Argentines to do the same.

  • @Medeasbiggestfan Unlike their neighbour, the Irish respect freedom and democracy, that is why they would never have invaded a couple of Argentine islands 8000 miles away from Ireland.

  • @Arminevh

    It was Argentina that invaded the Falklands (and removed freedom and democracy from the islanders). It was the British who liberated the islanders from military dictatorship.

  • @Medeasbiggestfan Wrong I am afraid, UK (that is England) invaded those Argentine islands both in 1833 and 1982.

    Freedom and democracy? it is an old trick to place people in someone else's lands and then claim they vote for you.

    Besides, what about the "freedom and democracy" of the Diego Garcians? what about the "freedom and democracy" of all those people all over the world murdered ,stolen and enslaved just because you lot wanted to put the price of the tea two cents down?

  • @Arminevh

    Why should the Falkland Islanders today be puniched for the actions of the UK government in 1833?

  • @Medeasbiggestfan If one is not responsible for one's ancestors fawlts, then one shouldnt benefit from their actions either.

    Besides "punished" is too strong a word in this case as no one is asking them to leave the islands or to change their way of life (not even their nationality), just to do the same we all did when we came from Europe: to accept the Argentine sovereignity that comes with these Southern lands.

  • @Arminevh

    All they're doing is living in the place of their birth. That's a fundamental right, not a benefit.

    Argentina wants to remove many of the rights and freedoms currently enjoyed by the islanders. If the Falklands ever became part of Argentina, the islanders would lose their own constitution, legislature, government, flag, currency and capital city. Argentina would remove the islanders' control over the islands' natural resources, immigration and (most importantly) sovereignty.

  • @Medeasbiggestfan No one is trying to remove their right to live there, as for the other rights, those islands are under British sovereignity and control, not under the islander's, a sovereignity UK stole from its right owners both in 1833 and 1982.

  • @Arminevh

    Not true, all the things I mentioned are determined by the democratically elected government of the islands. Read the Falkland Islands Constitution.

    In 1982, British forces returned the islands to the government chosen by their people.

  • @Medeasbiggestfan "chosen by their people"? once again: it is an old trick to place people in someone else's lands and then claim they vote for you.

    Those islands (despite all that rubbish about "democracy" and "constitutions") are under British sovereignity and control, the dispute is between Argentina and UK, the islanders are just the excuse Britain use to steal the Argentine sovereignity.

    In fact is not the first time UK try to steal our territory, in fact they had already try it 3 times!!

  • @Arminevh

    Democracy isn't a 'trick', it's a fundamental right that belongs to all people.

    What you say is not correct. Under UK, EU and Falklands' law, the sovereignty of the islands is determined by the islanders. If they ever wanted to become independent, or join Argentina, it would happen.

    For the moment though, the islanders want their birthplace to remain a self-governing overseas territory of the UK.

  • @Medeasbiggestfan ha ha, good joke man, because hey! what about the self determination and democracy of the Diego Garcians, of the Irish, of all those millions around the world you lot have murdered, stolen, enslaved and tortured? what about you burglars trying to invade (and failed) 3 times Argentine soil? if you are so desperate to defend "self-determination", why dont you invade Spain (for instance) and help ETA to become independent?

    You people are the kings of hypocrisy!!!

  • @Arminevh

    The removal of self-determination from peoples throughout the world at the hands of the British was wrong. But I ask again, why should the people of the Falklands be punished for the actions of the UK government in the past?

    A good analogy for the Falklands is Malta, which used to be a British colony. In 1964, Malta voted to become independent, the UK let it happen. Malta is strategically very important in the Mediterranean, but the UK gave it up when asked to by its people.

  • @Arminevh - I don't know what the result of the referendum would be if it was made in the Basque country. Would majority vote independence?

  • @Medeasbiggestfan You can´t do that because they BELIEVE that they are English. That´s what they have been shown all their lifes, but they live a big lie. England has always STOLEN territories, and this is not an exception. Malvinas Islands were, are and will always belong to Argentina, you like it or not. We had the disgrace to have been ruled by a government which hadn´t been chosen by people, so we are not responsible for that.

  • @lveaasaez

    Firstly, the islanders are not English, they are many of Scottish ancestry and see themselves as British.

    No territory permanently belongs to another country. Look at a map of the world for 100 years ago and you'll see many differences from today's maps.

    In a democratic society, the sovereignty of a territory is determined by the people born in that territory. Societies where sovereignty is imposed on the people by the state are not free.

  • Now now Emiliano and what would that achieve.

    Another unecessary war

    A new generation of dead service personnel

    Another crushing defeat for Argentina

  • End of history?

  • No you'll find their British. You owned the islands for like 2 yeras. We owned them for 170 years.

  • I think the people who live on the Falklands would not agree.

  • En 1833 no le preguntaron nada a los isleños.... vinieron y los sacaron. Ahora les preocupan los isleños? dejame de joder.

  • The rights of the islanders in 1833 were ignored, which was wrong. Ignoring the rights of the islanders today would be just as wrong.

  • @Medeasbiggestfan I agree well said.

  • Look at the history and a little conflict in 1982... then say that.

  • Yall don't have the balls to take the British on again!!

  • Rittons?. where re they from?? Rittony??,

  • Spain belongs to the Philippines. ; )

  • Argentina belongs to Spain

  • lol, I think you will find...it does not.

  • How do you figure?

  • Look it up, and you will find that they are in fact, British.

  • Agies = thieves

  • RichSieben In answer to your question, if a field has no one living on it and,,, it is not fenced then after making a stake, after 12 years yes you can,, Roman Law. well outdates Argentinian law,

  • The Argentines were just dying to be made an example of, invading territory to which they have no legitimate claim.

  • Well, those Iberians who invaded and claimed what we now call South America did pretty well.

  • Well, Galtieri must have got bored killing his own people, so he gave them to us to deal with instead!

  • Las Malvinas Siempre INGLES

  • and why? The English landed there first.

  • The Falklands British, Red White and Blue, Loyal and True.

    7 Signals Unit Byron Heights veteran.

  • Man, there were very few people in that boeing!

    Most of the seats were empty.

  • Page 201

    " Britain indeed extended its regional sphere of influence, formaly claiming South Georgia and South Sandwich in 1908, as well as a slice of Antarctica"

  • Following your logic the whole World was stolen from UK Colonialism, so return all territory stolen by your Queen!!!! Australia, New Zeland, etc.

  • That's why I think the only criterion now should be the will of the residents. There were attempts to make Australia a republic, but the majority of residents did not want it. BTW. The Queen is not mine, because I am not British ;)

  • argentina should worry more about its habit of inviting nazis to its shores, its dirty war when it murdered thousands of its own people and its continuous disastrous economy more than the Falklands which are a British concern not argentinian... LAS MAVINAS SON DE INGLATERRA

  • las malvinas son argentinas!!! te guste o no!!

  • @grantzx Be carefull shit head. You lost more soldiers fighting just 2 months in the Falkland war than 7 years of in Iraq war.

    That's means we can hurt you, very badly. So, don't underestimate us.

    Malvinas are an Argy concern. And you know what? we scare you

  • @grantzx and the British and Americans did not? LOL

  • @PatagonianCurse , what do you mean by your question patagonian? The British and Americans did not do what?

  • @jasonptify Nazis hid it in their land

  • @grantzx ...hu hu kiss my ass...The fucklands are Argentine...hu hu in your face fukin England!!

  • No................ People should remember that no one alive today is responsible for the empire and that people can't choose where they are born.

    And taking there homes away from them because of something that happen 100's of years ago is crap.

  • This is so funny the people of UK didnt' care or know about the Malvinas until 1982. We share the Islands for 150 years.

    UK didnt EVER!! came here to said hi the Kelpers!!! It was about the ego of Mg. Tacher and the junta who was trying to regain power. As a citizen that territory was part of Arg. always was until now 1982. ..... So why you care???

  • When a part of a territory gets invaded and annected and diplomatic efforts to make the invaders withdraw do not bring any results - the only option is to use military force. This is a normal thing goverments do. "Back in control, force them to surrender". No other option.

  • No matter in what way do you like to explain Nobody will see that in the same way you do. Your country always was and always will be COLONIALISTIC!!!!!!!

  • Colonialism is a convenient label you put when you do not like something. I fact colonialism is bad when it involves oppressing a native population. If there is no native population (like in the case of the Falklands/Malvinas) you cannot talk about colonialism. If there is a native population, but it does not object a colonial rule (like in some other cases) - this is also no problem. The problem is invading one's territory without the concent of the inhabitants.

  • But you are forgoting something:

    there was people living in that islands when you usurpated them!!

    Anyway, even if no people where living there, who are you to take that land as your own? that islands where part of the Argentine territory since 1810 and before that, part of the territories that belongs to Spain not England. don't you agree? Please, read some history in an objetive way.

  • But British settlement was going on before Argentina existed as a state. Even though, that would be a territorial dispute, not a case of colonialism. There would be two nations colonizing a desert land and having dispute. But now there are people there living for generations. They have been living longer than Argentine settlement before.

  • so, following your line of thinking, if you have, in example, a little field in Essex with no people living in it, can i go and take it as mine?. And yes, you are absolutely right, they have been living longer, ... since England stole them.

  • There are many situations when both sides can find arguments in favour of their possession of a territory. Following your logic the whole Argentina was stolen from native population. You cannot deal with the injustice done in the past (even assuming that it was injustice, although it is debatable) by bringing new injustice.

  • "stole". "England".

    The UK reclaimed the islands after they were stolen from us by the spanish. The first ever claim for the islands were in 1690 by the UK not just England. And when we did RETURN what was there. An island with 24 civilains, a defence force (80% of which were british), a deputy governor (who was british), a whaling company (British) and a governor who always asked permission from London to do anything on the islands.

    Stole, very interesting choice of words.

  • I think UK always like to expand the way of their Colonialism!!! across the globe this is onther example of that don't you think? Same happened in Hon Kong, India, and other parts of the world.

  • Noticeably you didn't bother to deny Argentina's ambitions, that makes a refreshing change by the way.

  • Ah don't you just love the irony of the vicious hate monger talking of imperialism when the British renounced their Empire after the Second World War and the only people with imperial ambitions in the South Atlantic are the Argentines who wish to impose an alien culture and dominate and subjugate the Falklanders.

  • u can fuk off! though's are our islands!

  • still looks as shit as it did in 82 to my mind!.

    malvinas son argentinas siempre

  • If we were stupid enough to give back to you the Falklands, after we destroyed every building, roads run ways, ports etc.how many of you Argies would come and start afresh in your new land

  • There's no need to use fighter-bombers as escorts to defend civil airplanes, 'cause we don't have any jet fighters... This is just a show to justify the increase of the defense budget for the islands... We won't mess the whole thing again... Don't worry...

  • How can celebrate so many deaths? Why so much evil?

  • The Falkland people decided which country to belong to. You Argies just can't seen to get that.

  • Yeah!

    you tell 'em!

    they cant even win the world cup without the hand of god or is that the god of hand ball?

    i was only 8 when the falklands kicked off & as a kid seeing those images of wounded troops & burning ships has a big impact on a child!

    kinda makes me feel humble for what ours guys went through out there even now with our boys & girls out in Irag & afghanistan!

    Much RESPECT to them!

  • Indeed its all about individual liberty. Socialists and Military Despots just dont understand that.

  • VIVA FRANCE!

  • haha, you daft cunt!! you are from spanish immigrants!

    Who is going to destroy us?! your pathetic excuse for a millitary?

  • Just remind them, of the Spanish Armada!!!

    Then they'll shut the fuck up!!!

  • Islas Malvinas: territorio argentino.

  • Que hayan ganado la guerra no significa que las islas le pertenezcan. Esa islas fueron heredadas de4l imperio español cuando Argentina se independizó en 1816.

  • How did Spain control Argentina? i bet they killed people to occupy it! Also, I'm not sure Spain handed over sovereignty of the Falklands to Argentina...

    Anyway, if you research a bit more, you will see that it is documented that the Islands were first discovered by John Strong in 1690 and named the 'Falkland channel' after viscount Falkland. before this, it was under French rule (from 1764) and was previously uninhabited.. Just because an island is close, does not mean you own it either

  • Los descubrimientos supuestamente acreditados a Strong,Hawkins o Davis,no son lo suficiente para acreditar algún título sobre el archipiélago.Aunque bautizaron las Islas con el nombre Falkland,no realizaron ni una toma de posesión invocando la corona inglesa ni ningún otro acto que implicara consecuencias jurídicas,por lo tanto el hecho de hayan avistado las islas no les otorga ninguna validez legal.

  • you claiming the falklands for argentina is like england claiming france, just because it is close! Even though the falklands were under no rule when we claimed them... The fact is, they are under OUR rule, no one elses! I don't care who claims them, it is Britain who inhabits them, until someone takes them, they are ours. I'm sorry, but there is no denying this, no matter how much we argue! the falklanders don't want to leave, if they did, i would be happy for britain to remove their claim

  • cra83:Yo diría que Gran Bretaña reclame las Malvinas es como si Argentina reclamara una parte de Londres.Los argumentos argentinos no son solos geográficos sino históricos y con registros serios.Hay algo que la historia nos enseña claramente;los ganadores no siempre son los que tienen la razón y Malvinas es un claro ejemplo de eso.El hecho de que hayan ganado la guerra por haber tenido un ejército mas poderoso que el nuestro no le otorga legitimidad a tu argumento.

  • I'm not saying that it creates legitimacy! I'm just saying that it's the only way of getting it back and you failed. I honestly wouldn't mind if the British government gave it to the French, Spanish, Argentinians etc but any country would be stupid to give up territory, that has strategic importance, to another country just because it says it is theirs. thats how the world works and there's nothing we can do about it, unfortunately!

  • oh, and i would say that Britain claiming Buenos Aires is similar to Argentina claiming London. its nowhere near the same as the Falklands!

    I would compare the Falklands to the isle of wight if you are going to use that arguement

  • cra83 El punto es que los argumentos británicos son cambiante, poco sólidos y faltos de argumentos firmes. Ustedes ocupan actualemnte las islas no porque les pertenezcan por legítimo derecho sino porque ganaron la guerra, pero eso no les otorga la razón.

  • Do you Argentinians watch these videos, just to argue?! Did you read my last comment correctly?! I said it's not for us to argue, it's up to our governments to come to a conclusion. I was just pointing out the British side of things. You seem to think British people are stupid (some are, but, this is true with all countries) and make wild claims. Also, according to you, changing arguments. You need to realise you are speaking to a reasonable, educated man. Not some idiot who knows nothing

  • oh, and furthermore... Do you see us attacking Denmark over the Faroe Islands? They are close to us and were inhabited by early British and Irish people in the 1st century A.D. I think both Argentina and Britain have claim to the Falklands. But to settle an argument, we should hand them to Spain or France! One last thing, how about you (very possibly descended from Spanish people)give Argentina back to the native Argentinians? EVERY country is made up of settlers, there's no escaping that!

  • just like Dan said Argentina wiil never try to take back the Falklands from England because this time they got a big base bring it on .

  • Never say never

  • i believe on the british military power video someoen asked you a question usa?

  • Really what was the video and the question?

  • from england? you mean britain?

  • god save the paras.

    para this and para that,

    paras all the way,

    an interesting time for paras,

    as the bullets start to play

  • Task force south. scots guards taking tumbledown welsh gaurds sapper hill mount william crawling gurkas maroon machine cant keep still marines yompin stompin stanley fire fights all the way sovereignty not negotiable the junta has to pay colonel h.jones may rest his bones v.c classical way! machine gun post turned into toast his smurg had a lot to say. 2007 copyright
  • eurargio1 are You suggesting the Argentinian Marines, were fucked over by some gay Brit Soldiers, Argentines Best defeated into, an Ingnominous Surrender by, GAY Guys,,,??? Lets have more Gay Troops,, eurargio1 engage Brain before, Mouthing off

  • check "vida joven en Malvinas"

    in 5:07 "men rubbing each other in a thong" and "dressed like women" in Mount Pleasant?!

  • And so what, I'm sure if I looked for it, I could find some videos of gay Argentine men. But as I'm not gay and not in the least bit interested...

  • They are british soldiers having sex with each other. You say you dont care about that but also gives me a lesson of british morality...

  • I don't care but that says more about my tolerance and speaks reams about your homophobia.

  • Oh - he was gorgeous....;-)))

  • The people who have been living on that island for generations and call it their home have the right to decide under whose jurisdiction they want to be subject. They chose Britain (full citizenship aquired 1983), and until the inhabitants decide otherwise; those islands will be legally British and recognised as such by the international community.

  • since they are british, they cant claim selfdetermination

    this is a dispute between british and argentines, no indigenous population

  • Self determination is a fundamental right under the UN charter, it can't be applied selectively as you seem to think - which by the way is rather racist.

    Over 90% of the current population of Argentina is descended from immigrants. By you standard none of them have any right to self-determination. This simple reductio ad absurdum shows how foolish your claim is.

  • Even though 1982 is the year i was born, i hope this war doesn't get forgotten, or to be more accurate British heroes who gave life and limb.

  • 18 yr old and a fan of Hitler. What a wally.

  • People get very emotional about this, for good reason. But they should show some respect, for both sides' dead. Britain won this war - the fools who think otherwise only serve to disrespect their own, who died. Even Napoleon admitted defeat, with utmost self respect. If folk don't feel for the sacrifice of their own, this goes on. And we have a squadron of F3s, ready.

  • Dan you is a bambi...

  • Não pisarão na Amazonia brasileira tão facilmente ingleses, cem dos seus soldados não se igualam a um guerreiro da selva...Venham e verão a morte a cada passo.

    É lamentável que o Brasil tenha apenas mandado pilotos de rastreamento para a guerra das Malvinas, o final teria sido outro...

  • deberia darte verguenza sucio imperialista ingles, son rapiña que se inmiscuyen en cualquier lado del mundo que puedan. LAS MALVINAS FUERON, SON Y SERAN ARGENTINAS.

  • exists a difference between "invade" and "recover". You invaded and we tried to recovered. Get out of my country!! go home!

  • No you invaded, trying to justify the indefensible seems an Argentine trait. The 30,000 disappeared during the Dirty War reduces every year in official Argentine figures.

  • "The 30,000 disappeared during the Dirty War reduces every year in official Argentine figures", now I know what kind of man are you... you are a happy lier.

    Our boys are truly men, you are a disgrace for your own people.

  • Really, last year the Argentine Government produced further estimates of the numbers of disappeared. Funnily enough the numbers went down again and are around 25% of the figures issued by human rights groups.

    Funnily enough I never here Argentine come out and flat say "the dirty war was wrong", there's always a little excuse that they were only "montoneros" killed or that there numbers aren't as bad as 30000, never that it was wrong.

    A real man admits his failings, a macho man can't.

  • you clearly have litle news of Argentina over there

    the thing is: CONADEP was a high level civil commitee with official support that interviewed thousands of victims and produced a well known document called NUNCA MAS with a well documented estimate of victims

    anyway the important thing is that our Justice put the commanders of the Junta on jail for life

  • No it didn't they were let out almost straight away. Funny how you forgot to mention that.

  • Masera and Videla are imprisoned right now, fyi

  • Two out of how many guilty?

    Videla is under house arrest, which isn't exactly hard time is it?

    Masera had a stroke in 2004, the case against him was dropped.

    Interesting, yet another case of the truth not quite matching the spin.

  • How many people in prison is needed for Argentina according to you?

    On the other hand, how many british are you going to put in jails after the Irak and Afganistan robbery?

  • Mmm, did pointing out your hypocrisy hit a nerve?

    British forces who committed crimes in Iraq have been jailed, in fact they went so far out of the way to be seen to just that they prosecuted several cases that should never have seen a court room.

    Sorry if that doesn't match the picture you're trying to paint.

  • The police officers that killed the Nigerian inmigrant by asfixia, and others before, what about that?

    And the UK crimes in Irak are being committed AS WE SPEAK! You talk about my hipocresy???

  • Yeah right.

    Not that you wouldn't be influence by a racist, xenophobic hatred of the British by any chance?

  • How can I be racist if my grandparents found liberty and freedom for their race in Argentina?

    I dont see why you have to insult me like that.

  • Only because you use racist and offensive language. Were you to converse in a reasonable manner I would reply in kind.

  • please tell me what are you answering with this: "Not that you wouldn't be influence by a racist, xenophobic hatred of the British by any chance?"

  • Probably in reponse to one of your racist, xenophobic posts.

  • I dont care about your racial origin, nor if you are a peaceful foreigner. But you guys are agressors to my country, having a military force 8000 miles from your home, and only 400 km from mine.

  • Which is only there because your country chose to resort to unprovoked aggression. The force is fairly small, threatens no-one.

    The only aggressors are Argentine, which continues to aggressively pursue a policy of confrontation over the islands.

  • No man, your guys are militarily occupaying our islands with 2000 soldiers and 2000 settlers to support them.

    UK government is there because of his ambitions!

  • This is nonsense, the Falklands were British before Argentina even existed. I can pick the Argentine sovereignty claim to pieces in seconds.

    The people living there have been there for over 175 years in some cases, how many Argentines go back that far?

    The 1000 military are they purely to deter Argentine aggression. Before the 1982 there was only 40 Royal Marines.

  • "I can pick the Argentine sovereignty claim to pieces in seconds"

    "The people living there have been there for over 175 years in some cases, how many Argentines go back that far?" much more than 2000!

    you are a funny guy