Added: 4 years ago
From: knupps
Views: 628,037
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (535)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How did I guess the Spitfire was going to win?

  • what the name of the music?!?!?! PLEASE!!!!

  • Utter cack... I've shat more entertaining things than this vid.

  • It depends.because some me109 ace's would have changed the sircumsatnces

  • looks nice, but it looks like they're going only 20 MPH

  • lame.

  • I THINK THIS IS FAKE

  • lol the 109 sucks ..... nice vid .... and this is one of my fave Yes tracks :)

  • I believe it was a lot of work, but only a few moments look nice. :)

  • complete bollocks !

  • I, Utter. RUBBISH.2.

  • the spitefie is not that good it has all the looks but it cant nock down an me109

  • @The06452 spitefie,should be Spitfire. cant should be,can't. nock,should be knock. The spitfire could and did shoot down Bf 109s. Your'e welcome.

  • @IBIGMAC69 you are a legand in words, I have had no luck finding who you are answering but I will find it.

  • LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

  • the spitfire was the superior aircraft not on statistics machanically wise but in combat

  • these crappy spities will never catch the Gustavs

  • I hate me109!!!

  • IIt was shown on the history channel that ME-109 was superior to Spitfire in ever aspect whether it was rate of climb or be it turning radius also the German finger 4 formations were superior in mutual support only disadvantage that the german had was that they had to come all the way over the english channel and spitfire used to lure them in lengthy dogfights which Me-109 had to cut short as they would have been running low on fuel by that time and thus became an easy prey for spitfire !!

  • @F139 The 109's chief advantage over the Spit 1 & Hurricane 1 was its fuel-injected Damlier-Benz engine vs. the carburator-fed Merlins of the former. The 109 could out-climb/dive both but not out-turn them unless the 109 pilot wanted to redline his turn. The 109 also had an 88 Imp gallon tank internally for @ 125m range. You could get to London and back as long as the RAF didn't object to your overflying London; otherwise you had @ 15 min combat time over London, @ 30-40 min. otherwise.

  • @TheSV3 Yeah you might be right !! that what i am saying !! British due to their early warning radar systems already had intimation of approaching Germans !! And they were waiting for them to engage them as far away from the channel so that they couldnt flee back. And this tactics worked

  • @F139 The tactic did indeed work! The 109e was fitted for a 550kg bomb but not a drop tank; that wouldn't happen until the e7 &F models came out and the Battle of Britain was over by then. Add to that the weaving the escorts had to do to keep pace with the bombers and later the order to stay close to the bombers until attacked didn't help much to preserve fuel either.

  • @TheSV3 yes you are right !! Hermann Goering made the wrong choice of making Stuka light bombers instead of Long range heavily armed bombers like B-17 flying fortress. It would have changed the face of battle as we remember it.

  • @F139 Goering had help in that one, particularly from Milsch, Udet, & Hitler, who put the kabosh on the long-range bomber notion. The Stuka was a great pinpoint dive-bomber as long as you had air superiority; otherwise it was meat on the table over Britain. Both Dowding & Park recognized the bombers as the real threat in the Battle and not the 109s, hence bombers got attack priority. The only 4-engined bomber I know of used with any consistancy was the Fw-200, but as in an anti-shipping role.

  • @TheSV3 Thats right !! you have quite an info on that one. I love military hardware and specially the military hardware that was put in action by germans during second world war !!!!

  • @F139 Thank you. The bulk of my data comes from 2 main sources: FIGHTER by Len Deighton and THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN: GREATEST AIR BATTLE OF WW2 by Richard Hough & Denis Richards. The rest is from WITH WINGS LIKE EAGLES by Michael Korda and an out-of print issue of WINGS magazine article entitled FALLEN EAGLES (Mar 2002, Vol 2 #2); to a lesser extent is INVASION 1940 by Derek Robinson but his contention is that the presence of the RN also helped stave off Sealion as well as the RAF.

  • wtf  is this shite?

  • FUCK!i love this game but i haven't a normal joystick...i bought 3-times but thats china shit...

  • @NACISTGEO

    Try logitech G940...i have that one...its awesome!

  • hurricane shoots down 109 - a likely story!

  • @conlonp1 Get a clue.

  • Rubbish, basura! crap Warning .....garbage.....piss of f, get a life . please stop...

  • @SlyNicolai yea, from what i learned they used the hurican for lite bombing, dive bombing and other types of flying that needed slower speeds and agility to hit slow or non-moving targets.

  • @cobra96svt570 - 109, Spitfire, Hurry or Junkers...very few of the "cannon fodder" young pilots got back home.

  • Comment removed

  • @ritschi96 It was not better, the ME109 could not turn as quick as a Spitfire. That is why the Luftwaffe turned their attention to Russia, because they could not succeed in demolishing British cities.

  • @ALBIONTYKE both aircrafts were amazing in it's own ways. the spitfire was not turning quicker. but the ME 109 was gaining altitude faster.

  • @TheHockeyfreak1964 Yes the dynamics of the Spitfire were better, but the ME109 was more powerful. The best thing was the pilots on both sides, very brave men. Not many people know, but at the start of WWII the French had the most modern aircraft in the world, but their pilots were (on average) less committed & few planes were ever used. Did you know that also Polish & Czechs flew Spitfires ?

  • @ritschi96 schwer unqualifizierte aussage...

  • @Cult1022 oke ich hab mich ein wenig aufgeregt;)

    Beide hatte ihre vorteile, die spitfire ( wobei es bei ihr auch viele Modelle gab) war mit der me 109 von der motorleistung ebenbürtig, wenn man die spitfire mit der me 109 E version zur zeit der Luftschlacht um england vergleicht, dann hatte die spitfire den vorteile der höheren Kurvenwendigkeit und war unterhalb der 4000m grenze der me 109 E komplett überlegen, da die luftkämpfe aber eher weit über der 4000m marke

  • @Cult1022 ausgefochten worden sind ,war sie wieder der me 109 unterlegen außerdem war die me 109 E schon ein einspritzer deswegen konnte sie , im Gegensatz zu der spitfire, parabel förmige manöver fliegen ohne das der motor aussetzt oder im schlechtesten falle abstirbt. 1943 wurden diese probleme zwar komplett behoben ,dafür gab es dann die focke wulf 190 die ihr bis auf die kurvenwendigkeit auf allen

  • @Cult1022 ebenen überlegen war. Ich hoffe die aussage war jetzt ein wenig produktiver;) Und am meisten kommt es aud die piloten an wer den sieg davon träg

  • @ritschi96 jo! saubere zusammenfassung! ziemlich ungewöhnlich für leute die auf Youtube Kommentieren! thx!

  • some very nice work! How did you get the planes to come apart in vue?

  • :D Totaly Western Dickwaving Luftwaffes Interceptor pilots were best and bfs 109

  • @Hiposinell They still lost.

  • Piss off with the computer games

  • IF you are going to post video games PUT IT IN THE TITLE!!! Utter rubbish.

  • @redcarpetphotography yea, he's probably seven years old and doesn't get it yet.

  • @redcarpetphotography udder rubbish? Get a grip buddy that was cool .

  • @redcarpetphotography that is no game just shitty animation

  • @redcarpetphotography for the record it´s a CG sequence. RTFD.

  • CGI garbage

  • this is dogs bolux!

  • God I hate CGI

  • bad

  • i just think that if planes fly by a camera it would look just much more fast not like this

  • Great new film on Youtube titled- "The Last Days of the Big Lie" youtube.com/watch?v=-48HQpgQRz­0

    Dr. David Duke's latest video- “The Real Rogue Nuclear State” is great also: youtube.com/watch?v=KLSlmLx4Fl­s

  • segui jugando con tu playstation que a ustedes les queda poco tiempo

  • 0:08 WW2 Spitfires flying past a Trident submarine

  • BF 109 >>>>>>> Spitfire

  • Wow! That guy defeated 2 ME 109 with a spitty! I bet he did it on "Easy" difficulty!

  • this is crap

  • Dam I thot this was real. But I seen the dumbass freak whatever his name is say n he's such dumbass he prolly made all that shit up he's prolly livin in moms basement wankin off 2 child porn n ww2 airplanes

  • ACHTUNG!..........SPITFIRE!...­­.......RKTRKTRKT.............­.­.ARGHHH

    Ich Crash, sie habe mir getroffen: ''Sprung aus'': Ich kann nicht ich bin stecken

  • Nice but ONE TINY mistake the Spitfire Hade 8 Machine guns 4 on each wing

  • @jasincl only the Mk Ia, Mk IIa and the Mk Va had that configuration. Starting with the Mk Vb the Spitfire had 2x 20mm cannons plus 4x .303 machine guns (1x cannon and 2x machine guns in each wing)

    Some Mk Is and IIs were fitted with 20mm cannons during the Battle of Britain, but the early cannons were prone to jamming

  • US airforce is a shit!

    Luftvaffe is the best!

  • @8as3gyz Spitfires were used by the RAF... Not the USAF

  • @autodriver3 Oh they were not to a large extent though !

  • @1339LARS Dude the RAF made the Spitfire and it was a very mass produced British aircraft second only to the Hurricane, we used them to a huge extent.

  • @autodriver3 Sorry, what I ment was it was used by the US, but not to a large extent (and it was made by Supermarine not the RAF).

  • Comment removed

  • nice but it's just a cartoons.....

  • Comment removed

  • SIEG ENGLAND.

  • IT IS NOT CALLED AN ME 109, EITHER IT IS CALLED A MESSERSCHIMDT 109 OR IT IS CALLED Bf-109 but whatever it is a common mistake...

  • who thinks that the 109 is cooler than the spitfire?

  • its not realistic because in reality the bf 109 would first and then eventually lose because it runs out of ammo/fuel and britanski had nnumbers

  • nice vid .. love the song at the end .. was it the group called Yes ?

  • @SlyNicolai why you answered anyways just like i knew you would

  • lol at the noob fight, guys get a life

  • @SlyNicolai I'd hook you up Bit like much women she don't fuck the handicapp And we all know why you signed up for "grunt" work ..and the diffrents is I haven't made a comment about video game play or computer generated video on here. Just bash your crippled ass

  • @freakyflow and you answeing me in the middle of the day shows me you have no life and for coming down to your level i would have to buy a wheelchair

    and she likes dutch chocolates says American chocolate tastes like freedom but the cost of it is too high and no one else wants it

  • @freakyflow So, having acces to PC in the middle of the day means that someone is nolifer? Think about it for a while.

  • @SlyNicolai well it works this way .. I sould like a pussy? ..pay me ...You hate my music pay me..You love my music..pay me Google my name...pay me..You click on one of my videos and made a view...Yup PAY ME! who are you again? And if pussy is pussy. And it was being called a pussy. Or having none cause my nuts were left in iraq ..Then call me pussy I guess i would stay at home playing video games online with a bunch of other guys too

  • @SlyNicolai well the diffrents is you live in the basement due to your lack of education. might be why you signed up for grunt work ..even a high school drop out can be set out in the field as bait ..metal detectors cost money lol And no at the age of 14 when my school fund was started by my mom i was in school and working the house we lived in was big After i was 18 i moved out at 24 i bought her a new house and she rents the old one ..she doesn't have to work

  • @SlyNicolai Dude you can dream of combat mos all you want playing video games in moms basement doesn't make it real another reason its a welfare check ...@24 i bought my mom her own house while you were still playing with GI.JOE's Type my name in search you'll see

  • @SlyNicolai Seeing a welfare check is payment you a loss or failment to provide work..and you couldn't do yours Wefare seems about right. Same line up as the guys you fought against Oh wait fought might be a harsh word. Ok no idea why you would add the words MAN SUCK and Chesse DICK to another man I know its a " new" army but i don't swing that way must be one of those pee pee airplane games thing you can call me SON all you want still not going to make me a 12 yr and naked

  • @SlyNicolai Military pension / Wefare check ..Just another strain on the econ. Had I not gone to Cornell University and had a lower I.Q. I would of signed up for pushing mud too. and your right I can still "Walk" and Talk and Fly and make Haz pay x2 Nice cushy officers pay Might be why i'm on a patio chillin waiting for room service in one piece. Beats sitting on a base in U.A.E. But even that was better then getting fragged Enjoy your retartedment ..Sergio is laughing..waiter

  • @SlyNicolai Still not Retired you were brought to the MEB and separated from active duty Fuck even i know there's no car bombs at 30,000 ft .Gotta love grunts! But what do i know..Shouldn't you be playing castle wolfeintein? you can even set charges on trucks Anything blows up you get to start over ; ) SON? There's no way we're anything close to family I don't own a pick up truck and i have all my own teeth Now crawl along and don't play with things you shouldn't be around in the first place

  • @SlyNicolai and unlike you i am in Cuba relaxing for 2 weeks I live in canada Don't worry i'll think of you why smoking a Cubian cigar I would send you one but ... I hear theres some sort of embargo with the USA and cuba LOL

  • @SlyNicolai Hmm lets see 18 you join the armed forces and retire in 25 years so that would make the age 43 to retire You maybe put in a few years but it still doesn't make you retired Thats my point ...Hey i think thats great You hate other peoples countries But severed yours No wonder guys strap on bombs and kill people randomly It's assholes like you That see others as a race and not a individual Why you keep worrying about looking bad? I don't have to do that You do it everytime you type

  • @SlyNicolai OK i'll type slower cause i know you can't read too fast...If you type in search Spitfire VS ME-190 it means your looking for a real dog fight However You end up getting This Made up version of the real thing ..You know like you being a Retired Infantryman at the age of 26 ! that plays video games I'm not reading your comments wrong you just don't have the I.Q. to push the right fuckin buttons on the keyboard. LOL Canada ..i'm in Cuba bitch relaxing ..No yanks here! LOL

  • @SlyNicolai And where do you see SPITFIRE VS ME109 "GENERATED MOVIE" ??????????? You don't you see SPITFIRE VS ME109 Once again the only dumbass is you ..were not going to fly ww2 planes in combat ever again?? wow your quick did ur mom come down to the basement and tell you at milky time ..Muppet

  • @SlyNicolai i see ww2 planes every day ..spitfire hurries even a lancaster bomber 1 of 2 still flying and flew in it and there nothing like living in moms basement making statements on turing agility on a game DUMBASS

  • @SlyNicolai wish you would stay to playing video games instead of BS comments based on video games

  • @freakyflow I have lol which makes you the jackass

  • the 109s look preety mean but we came with the spitfire hellcat and tore the shit out of them

  • allthough the spitfire was just a crappy spill of luck your video has some nice elements in it like the underwater images, real nice...

  • Dude the spitfire sucked it was made by the british and the british cant make SHIT.

  • @starwarsben We cant make shit but it was our shit engine that made your mustang great you tard!

  • @starwarsben in over your head kid...go home.

  • @starwarsben dude the spitfire is what saved britain from defeat in ww2 in the battle of britain

  • SPITFIRE IS THE BEST FUCK YES

  • @ambspier Second best the P-51 is better :D had better range and was WAY WAY WAY faster but still the best allied fighters of all time.

  • @1bearcatf8f true true but you got to admit the spitfire is beast

  • @ambspier Well the spitfire is like a brittish Mustang there both fast and highly agile but for sheer numbers the 109 wins.

  • @1bearcatf8f

    Spit MK 8 had range

    Spit MK 14 was faster All spitfires could out turn a p-51 All spitfires built at the same time as p-51's could out-climb them

    the spit was there in 39 and still top class in 45

    The P-51 would be lucky to be second-best, get behind, the FW-190D & Tempest

  • Ridiculous

  • when the spitfire let it rip on the jerrie why were they at like 10 feet above the water?Kinda unrealistic dont u think?

  • @17Pound3r yeah?

  • I'm not usually into the cg stuff, favoring the real thing to anything else, but your effort should be commended. Well done.

  • LAME

  • they didnt fly THAT low

  • Really it all depends on the speed. The 109 had a much smaller wing area with a higher loading so was less responsive to turn at speed but with its leading edge slats was superior to the spit and hurricane at low speed handling, a climbing left turn was a good way to get away from a spitfire up till the Gustav (Heinz Knoke) Try and find the book I flew for the Fuhrer. I was always in the 109,s cant turn camp till I read this.seems they were quite good , just shite at landing. Tempests for me!

  • @warp65 damn i loved that book.

  • this is spitfire, BF-109!!!!!!!!!!

  • noob its BF-109 not ME-109

  • NutzerYOu, please, stop with the nerdy, computer boy talk. It's bad enough I have to see that nonsense on the computer videos.

    .

    So I gather you're in 9th grade at what school?

    .

    Thank you.

  • @NutzerYOu how can you tell?

  • ****This post in loving memory of E. MacDonald a Spitfire Pilot Shot down over the channel and picked up by a Russian Trawler. Returned home to Canada to live in peace and die at a ripe old age, and become my friend before he went. If you love your freedom, thank a Veteran.****

  • @Bigredgumball- Yeah, Bigredgumball- ya'll helped make it safe for World Communism. Thanks a lot.

  • what is this shit? omg, put this video on your ass, The ME 109 was more better of Spitfire. All german heroes of luftwaffe tell the same, "ME 109" better.

  • Me109=Cool

    Spitfire=Beautiful

  • A Spitfire shot down a 109 ... So rare that it takes a game to show this. :-)

  • Why r all z Germans getting shot down by z allied pigs!

  • pfff, these Bf-109s have East-front markings....laaaaaaame :D

  • 0:10 looks like a Hurricane, not a Spitfire.

    And those look like G6109's, unless those are Spit9's, no way in fekking hell a hurri or Spit catches it, let alone allows one of them to get that close on it with guns.

    The 109s were notorious for climbing and flat out fast speed.

    This vid is therefore a bit unrealisitic.

  • @knutupps

    Norsk?

  • LOL

  • @okaaaiiiden

    fuel injection is more efficient.....

  • nice video!! The only good Kraut is a DEAD KRAUT....YESTERDAY, NOW AND FOREVER.!!!!

  • @sisco249, you my friend, are a moron.

    Hopefully the world will conspire so that you will NEVER be in a position of power, in any form.

    If you were a manager of a frickin' pencil factory, that would be intellectually speaking, far too much control over others for you to handle safely and competently.

  • Should have spiced it up by having the little mermaid pop outa the ME109 under the sea!

  • You should try making it a bit faster in sony vegas or something, so it'll turn out smoother

  • War ja mal wieder klar das die scheiß KANACKEN ein video machen wo das "nachgebaute" Me Modell gewinnt lechelich me ist 100000mal BESER

  • The bottom of the north sea is full of this wrecks.

    Wonder how they look now after 65 years

  • I'd like to pick up one out of the sea!! or look at it in its tomb....

  • uuhsearching for a guy that will make me go wild

  • Guys need your help im modeling an Arado 196 from the luftwaffe but i dont know what airplane i can model to make the air fight.

  • How about an RAF b-25 of coastal command?

  • NEVER just a Deream

  • very bad .... -.-

  • thats true but your are talking about like a turbo system the me used to have for high altitude dogfights

  • GERMAN

    Erich Hartmann 352, Gerhard Barkhorn 301, Günther Rall 275, Otto Kittel 267, Walter Nowotny 258, Wilhelm Batz 237, Erich Rudorfer 224, Heinz Bär 221 etc.

    You see these guys here, they scored most of their kills on the Eastern Front against crappy Russian pilots / planes. Erich Hartmann for example only scored 5 kills on the Western Front. I'd expect most of these guys didn't see too many P51s.

  • @elanxx

    Hartman saw some over Rumania. Well, he shot them down.

  • @elanxx

    Rall was commander of a JG in France from 1944 on. Sure, he wouldn´t have seen P51.

    Nowotny was commander of a specail JG, equipped with Me262. I am sure he didn´t fight the Allies, too.

    Sorry, but your post is full of mistakes.

  • I merely said that most of their kills would have been on the Eastern Front against poor Soviet fighters, you have just confirmed what I've said by saying that neither Rall or Nowotny would have fought many P51s or Allies. Thank you.

  • Do you really think, that a JG in France would have fought Soviet fighter above France?

    As far as I know, no Me262 were flown on the eastern front, so where is your point?

  • @elanxx I dont think Russian planes are crappy: Think of the Mig3 or the LA7! Btw: why does everybody say the american planes are soo great? They only destroyed german planes because they were diving down to attack. No american plane can withstand a MK108 machinegun for more than 2 hits.

  • The Mig 3 was a piece of bolshevik garbage, so say I, so says Wikipedia.

    "The MiG-3 was difficult to fly in peace time and much more so in combat. It had been designed for high-altitude combat but combat over the Eastern Front was generally at lower altitudes where it was inferior to the German Messerschmitt Bf 109 as well as most modern Soviet fighters. It was also pressed into service as a fighter-bomber during the autumn of 1941 but it was equally unsuited for this."

  • There's still the La series and the Yak series, both of which, when used in mock dogfights, outperformed all American and British fighters except the Spitfire Mk. IX

  • lol, the P47 would take many, many, MANY hits. Tne P 51 was fast and manouverable, so yes, they dived on targets, which is what it was ment for, they called in Boom and Zoom.

  • thats true thous 30mm cannons were heavy, two hits and splash, but the p-51 had a superv maneuverability, four .50 guns, longer range and the latest model higher service celling, they were good

  • The Mustang for most of its service had six .50 guns, but as maneuverable as it was, the maneuverability of the German fighters was still quite a match. And the service cieling wasn't really of much use except for maybe running away.

  • the higher operational cieling can be used to gain and advantage position during the first ride against the enemy, any way you are right, german fighters where nothing but a problem for any enemy they might encounter, fast maneuverable and reliable.

  • @Buemmo

    The american planes of the day were great! BUT, only because the P51 had a Rolls Royce engine in it... ( For the american readers, Thats a british engine by the way )

  • Not neonazi nor anything but I know my facts, in the last part of the war Hartmann shot down 5 p-51s three of them flown by americans, like it or not, because of their long flight time they had they became pretty good, Im shure any other guy with a good plane and all that experience and time might be able to do it, like Yeagger he only fly like two years, hartman was fliying since 39 till 45

  • @BUDAISEI88 Hartmann was flying gliders at 11, got his license at 15, joined the Luftwaffe at 17 but didn't earn his "Wings" till March 1942 when he was commissioned to JG/52. He didn't have a kill till Nov of 42' and didn't even make 1st Lieutenant till July of 44,' OUCH! He did however receive Knights Cross in Oct. 43.'Like most young recruits, he made alot of rookie mistakes early in his combat career. He was even grounded for 3 months.

  • If Blizzard, Ubisoft, or Bethesda made this, it would be movie quality, and not early CD shit

  • oh yes bad in the air xD

    surreal...

    watch videos about erich hartmann ;D

    @ XxXklyerXxX

    in the beginnin of the air battle the germans had more plans. but hitler made a tactical fail he attack london...not the airports from england...

    and til 1943 the english had more planes as germany =D

    also sei mal ruhig...

    golfproll ich lass dich hier nich hängen ;D

  • Yeah true, if he had carried on attacking the airfields then maybe the R.A.F would have been defeated, fortunately, from a British point of view, he made a huge mistake turning on London.

  • @musicbruv Thats what i thoguht to, but I watched a programme recently where some guy did a huge computer simulation taking everything into account (even weather!) where he concluded that the raf would have survived at minimal levels, but the luftwaffe would have run all their resources dry

  • Comment removed

  • and why the German had lost the air battle to england? The German planes had even more than the British, my friend. xD

  • Germany lost the Battle of Britain because the Luftwaffe was not designed for this way of battle. The Luftwaffe was designed to support groundforces not to for  tactical bombing raids. The biggest bomber in this periode was the He 111(2-3 t bombs). Compare it with a bomber like the US B17 (5 to 6 t) you can see Germany had the wrong planes for this job.