Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
So, wow, yeah. They sound so progressive and intelligent until they talk about music. Bad habit? That's like asking why do people use English or German. Music is a language that can transfer info faster than words. A stupid tune is like a stupid sentence, not a bad habit(altho for some...)Like I said below, didn't Douglas address this unfortunate shortcoming of clinical scientists/researchers in HHGTTG? I just don't see how bellydancing is going to help prolong the species...
@doctorfreakus please don't just assume because most of these people are 'left' of politics (i think), that 'left' politics is the correct choice.
i read the selfish gene, and it affected my view of life profoundly.
but i also hold positions like Austrian economics to be analogical to being the 'evolutionary theory' of economics, with communism holding the position of creationism
don't be a liberal (US defined) OR conservative. be a classical libertarian. Bastiat, not Marx.
"It may be that some future analysis shows that music serves some reproduction function - I can't see that it does"
Aren't the reproductive benefits obvious?Justin Timberlake doesn't seem to have a hard time attracting ladies.
The reproductive function of art/music/creativity was argued pretty persuasively in Miller's Mating Mind. Is Pinker not aware of the theory or is he just rejecting it? It's a lot more parsimonious than his ideas, I think.
Well to be fair, that book seems to have been published years after this video was recorded (1998).
Also, he's not rejecting the idea, he says that it may be true, but that he hasn't been convinced yet.
I think the argument from Justin Timberlake might be a bit thin though, as it could just as easily be the fame and fortune that is attractive. Popularity in sports and movies seems to attract similar attention. Without isolating the variables, it's difficult to draw conclusions.
@theinquisitor Well I am more attracted to musicians that actresses. Mostly because I am a musician myself, and just find them alot sexier lol. I suppose in that sense, what one appreciates, they will appreciate in other people. That could be music for alot of people
@677boston I think Douglas Adams answered this in reverse(as usual). Isn't there a line towards the beginning of Hitchhiker's "...but mostly because the scientists never got invited to those kind of parties..." -LOL
does anyone know if pinker is aware of the maternal immune hypothesis for homosexuality and the hormonal theory of sexuality? it seems to me that a quick survey of them suggest an optimum configuration of hormones could be calculated.
I'm surprised that none of them mentioned musics powerfull connection to proto-languages that communicate emotions rather than concepts.
Identifying patterns in sound and translating them to emotional responses would seems to me a very handy thing for survival, birds and whales are good examples.
The fact that Pachabell's cannon can induce tears of joy just means we have learnt how to target the response with musical technology for our own pleasure as opposed to our survival.
plus, music is often used in propaganda such as newsreels and campaign commercials. it would seem that hijacking the emotional centers of others' brains would be extremely beneficial in an evolutionary sense.
Thanks for posting this inquisitor. Despite the poor video, the audio comes through well and the message is conveyed well. Anyone who dwells too much on the visual is probably not listening as well as they should.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
inquisitor, the quality of your last videos (the ones that I'm aware of) are very poor.
youtube videos are as bad as they are when working properly, now on top of that you have all this noise and bad image? Sorry but I am just giving you a tip here my friend
Unfortunately the source video was bad quality to start with (link to source in description box). It was recorded back in 1998 in real media format when video compression was poor and bandwidth was low, and so the resolution was about 192x144 and blocky. Converting it to divx video for editing and then youtube upload conversion further degraded the image. It was either this or just a slideshow while they're talking. My other videos not from this source are of good quality.
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
Justin Timberlake is attractive? I guess that depends on whether you're asking a woman with an (evolved) brain.
fairiebee 11 months ago
dawkin's and pinker are my favorite. but only because i have read their books, i'll get to the others.
CytherLynx 1 year ago
So, wow, yeah. They sound so progressive and intelligent until they talk about music. Bad habit? That's like asking why do people use English or German. Music is a language that can transfer info faster than words. A stupid tune is like a stupid sentence, not a bad habit(altho for some...)Like I said below, didn't Douglas address this unfortunate shortcoming of clinical scientists/researchers in HHGTTG? I just don't see how bellydancing is going to help prolong the species...
doctorfreakus 1 year ago
@doctorfreakus please don't just assume because most of these people are 'left' of politics (i think), that 'left' politics is the correct choice.
i read the selfish gene, and it affected my view of life profoundly.
but i also hold positions like Austrian economics to be analogical to being the 'evolutionary theory' of economics, with communism holding the position of creationism
don't be a liberal (US defined) OR conservative. be a classical libertarian. Bastiat, not Marx.
lol rant much?
CytherLynx 1 year ago
I can't believe that Pinker says:
"It may be that some future analysis shows that music serves some reproduction function - I can't see that it does"
Aren't the reproductive benefits obvious?Justin Timberlake doesn't seem to have a hard time attracting ladies.
The reproductive function of art/music/creativity was argued pretty persuasively in Miller's Mating Mind. Is Pinker not aware of the theory or is he just rejecting it? It's a lot more parsimonious than his ideas, I think.
677boston 2 years ago
Well to be fair, that book seems to have been published years after this video was recorded (1998).
Also, he's not rejecting the idea, he says that it may be true, but that he hasn't been convinced yet.
I think the argument from Justin Timberlake might be a bit thin though, as it could just as easily be the fame and fortune that is attractive. Popularity in sports and movies seems to attract similar attention. Without isolating the variables, it's difficult to draw conclusions.
theinquisitor 2 years ago 5
@theinquisitor Well I am more attracted to musicians that actresses. Mostly because I am a musician myself, and just find them alot sexier lol. I suppose in that sense, what one appreciates, they will appreciate in other people. That could be music for alot of people
Zando24 3 months ago
@677boston I think Douglas Adams answered this in reverse(as usual). Isn't there a line towards the beginning of Hitchhiker's "...but mostly because the scientists never got invited to those kind of parties..." -LOL
doctorfreakus 1 year ago
@677boston Music =/= creativity
Music is a byproduct of evolution. As is writing and reading.
marcotenshi 1 year ago
does anyone know if pinker is aware of the maternal immune hypothesis for homosexuality and the hormonal theory of sexuality? it seems to me that a quick survey of them suggest an optimum configuration of hormones could be calculated.
Tuppington 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Question: Why is the kettle boiling?
Atheist answer: Because the water's been heated to 100 degrees centigrade resulting in a change in state from liquid to gas.
Christian answer: Because I want to have some tea.
For more about how Atheists and Christians interpret evidence very differently, check out my channel.
atheistfriends 2 years ago
Dennett always pauses in mid sentence, struggles the find the right words, and the queefs out the most confusing verbiage.
TheObnubilators 2 years ago
imho ... dennet's 'confusing verbiage' is a byproduct of his field, philosophy. agree perhaps?
hhiippiittyy 2 years ago
@hhiippiittyy tell that to Ayn Rand(she might bitecha
doctorfreakus 1 year ago
Conflicting multiple thoughts, perhaps.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Giants of the mind
TheObnubilators 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The God Debate" is on my channel.
atheistfriends 2 years ago
I'm surprised that none of them mentioned musics powerfull connection to proto-languages that communicate emotions rather than concepts.
Identifying patterns in sound and translating them to emotional responses would seems to me a very handy thing for survival, birds and whales are good examples.
The fact that Pachabell's cannon can induce tears of joy just means we have learnt how to target the response with musical technology for our own pleasure as opposed to our survival.
Tapecutter59 2 years ago
plus, music is often used in propaganda such as newsreels and campaign commercials. it would seem that hijacking the emotional centers of others' brains would be extremely beneficial in an evolutionary sense.
Tuppington 2 years ago
Too much brilliance in one room.
Phi1618033 2 years ago 7
Thanks for posting this inquisitor. Despite the poor video, the audio comes through well and the message is conveyed well. Anyone who dwells too much on the visual is probably not listening as well as they should.
eod4me 3 years ago 4
Bad quality video is far better than no video at all. I listen to these without looking at the screen much anyway.
anything4ai 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
inquisitor, the quality of your last videos (the ones that I'm aware of) are very poor.
youtube videos are as bad as they are when working properly, now on top of that you have all this noise and bad image? Sorry but I am just giving you a tip here my friend
adorianvlad 3 years ago
Unfortunately the source video was bad quality to start with (link to source in description box). It was recorded back in 1998 in real media format when video compression was poor and bandwidth was low, and so the resolution was about 192x144 and blocky. Converting it to divx video for editing and then youtube upload conversion further degraded the image. It was either this or just a slideshow while they're talking. My other videos not from this source are of good quality.
theinquisitor 3 years ago
thanks very much for the upload, ignore this^ prick
CocoMac877 2 years ago