Added: 1 month ago
From: williamjwagener
Views: 4,890
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (410)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Birthers - A mentally changed individual who followed the rants of Orly Taitz. A Dentist/Lawyer who could not convince any court of her actuations of BHO not being a NBC & committing SS fraud. Most attempts were dismissed due to the evidence having no merit and even lost a decision in Georgia where defendant BHO nor his attorney Michael Jablonski failed to show for court. Her followers would not accept any ruling by any court stating that it was all a big conspiracy to take over the USA.

  • @williamjwagener After a JURY comes to the same conclusion then what? I'll keep posting it, even if the SCJ came out tomorrow and said that BHO is a NBC you would still say it’s a conspiracy or a lie. You Birthers lose time after time, with every Judge saying the same thing, you people are wrong, but still with the same dribble, "Mamma said Obama not a NBC." well MOMMA IS WRONG Col Sanders.

  • Okay, so he loses by default for not showing up in court and he's off the ballot. This will be so damn great if this occurs.

  • @williamjwagener so taitz  brought in 12 lay witnesses? And what evidence ...nothing?

  • Who Checked. Lie. I have attendded all these hearings and NEVER seen the actual physical paper and ink used to make a BO B.C. except the one from Kenya , Mombasa General Hospital in Sept. 8, 2008. YOU have NOT seen it either. IF a Hawaian one exists they should bring it to COURT sometime, and have it tested and proved. Thanks for the LOL.

  • @williamjwagener the kenya BC was discredited over 2 years ago (the errors on it were so glaingly obvious even a child could see them) presented by covnicted forger.

    the copy released on the web that was signed and sealed by the hawaii DOH is good enough for ANY court in the land, but not for the birthers.shows how much respect they have for the law.

    the original in archive CANNOT BY LAW be released, but yet again the birthers don´t care about the law, they feel they´re aboe it.

  • @erizo1602 Erizo, NONE of that explains why OBAMA is using someone else's Soc. Sec. number issued to someone born in 1890. Only a NON-citizen would have NO SS of their own. What do you say to THAT. And also the Kenya Legislature has acknowledged thta one of their own naitive born in Kenya is the American President. Mitt Romneys father was born in Mexico... so he does NOT qualify either.

  • @williamjwagener simple question - how has he been paying taxes if he didn´t have a valid SS nº? ah! forgot that one didn´t you.

    repeting falsehood thats have been debunked ages ago does not make them true, no matter how loudly you shout them.

    likewise, repeating vattelist nonsense and expecting it to be taken seriuosly by the courts is a guaranteed route to fail. a swiss authors book containing the NBC laws of his native country do not override u.s. law and the constitution.

  • Frankly, the part I find most amazing about this is that people are trying to go at this through state judiciary. When the POTUS is even remotely in a position where he may have done something illegal, the proper venue is a congressional inquiry.

    It's still stupid as hell to question the legitimacy of the presidents birth after five years of investigation haven't produced zip, but at least try and do this properly.

  • Hey, William! If you don't show up for a court date, don't they send out a bench warrant for your arrest??? SO WHERE IS IT??? OBUTTHEAD NEEDS TO BE IN PRISON!!!!! Orly needs to go to every state and make this appeal, and get him off of EVERYONE'S BALLOT!! RON PAUL IN 2012!!

  • @SusanQ83642 I agree. I think the Judge knows that Nixon claimed Executive Privilege and Obama would too. Even though it is NOT in the constitution. I am grateful that the Judge granted my Camera Crew court access though. because we got the best audio and video of what went down. Next time you don't want to "participate, claim the Obama privilege, and "suspend your Participation" in the court you want to skip out on. LoL.

  • In the face of overwhelming evidence, an other judge issued a summary judgement overturning this with experts testifying that the birth certificate was a fake, the SS# out of sequence. Watch this.. OBAMA Disqualification - Judge's ABSURD RULING. The FRAUD & CONTEMPT CONTINue. Go to her website and download the briefs. this is criminal we've had a coup who has taken over our government and then they want to NDAA us. That's that criminals do.!!! Just look at it people. Stealing Freedom

  • @iondetox " experts testifying that the birth certificate was a fake, the SS# out of sequence"...he is no expert, the BC is real (atl east if he was legit he would know you can't prove a forgery from a pdf) and the ss# is a common clerical error, and that # is no longer his ssn thanks to birther performing fraud to obtain it.

  • @noliesundead How convienent that all we have to show is damn PDF file? If Obama was real just like any other man he would just simply release it for others to see. I mean, what would be the big deal? I didn't have a rough time presenting mine when I joined the military, why should he, have a rough time with it?

  • @shumanitutonkaowachi "How convienent that all we have to show is damn PDF file?"....well since it has been YEARS since Hawaii has stop issuing Physical copies it is only the birthers fault for waiting so long. and he already released the legal doc that Hawaii issue's (the COLB) no one has to prove themselves twice, stop being unreasonable.

    " I didn't have a rough time presenting mine when I joined the military".....ok, and Obama resealed his so why are you crying?

  • @noliesundead Sketchy.......It had only been two years before his birth that Hawaii even became a state. Anybody could have flew in at that time and got a birth certificate. At that time, America was prosperous, everybody wanted to be here. Hawaii would have been a shoe in for citizenship.

  • @shumanitutonkaowachi why is it sketchy?

    "only been two years before his birth that Hawaii even became a state"...your point?

    "Anybody could have flew in at that time and got a birth certificate"...you can say that about any state. but can you prove it? or is all you got is hearsay?

    "awaii would have been a shoe in for citizenship"...what does that even mean?

  • @noliesundead For your INFO, I did original genealogy Research on the Wageners, and Desjardins, Eatoughs etc. back in the 1960- 1980, and I talked to county clerks in Hawaii, Wisc. Illinois, Mich, Calif. Idaho, Virginia, N.H. etc. and always was allowed to go thru ORIGINAL records snooping, copying dates and info, but if I wanted a 5 cent xerox copy, they would make me pay $2.oo or $5 or whateve for a Cert. copy. Hawaiian clerk told me first hand how easy it was back in the 1960's. Geeez.

  • @williamjwagener this charade is a sheep show. The do what ever, when ever, how ever they (elite) see fit. Been like this for eons. Fortunately for them, the masses follow like a bunch of

    DUMB

    ASS

    SHEEP

  • @williamjwagener last time i check a XEROXED copy is not an OFFICIAL Copy with a seal . I see what you did there but fast talk does not work in a written medium.

  • @noliesundead At the time, I was just turning 17, I was in awe, that other than a tomestone, was a written record of my G. grandDads birth, death &, cause of death. And those records went back 200 years in America and even father in Eurpean Church records,and they still existed. I did NOT need "certified" copy, I just wanted the names dates and stuff for my Genealogy work. $2.oo was a lot of $ in 1962. I worked for 35 cents/hr. Pt is I could easily access the "PUBLIC" record. Anyone could.

  • @williamjwagener nice to nice you could not even spell tombstone correctly.

    "I did NOT need "certified" copy",.....if you want to use that info in a court of law, you're gonna have to get one. and we got the names and dates on Obama so why is your side still whining? " stuff for my Genealogy" the key word there is "MY".

  • @noliesundead Why is this same case being brought in Alabama, Indiana and Wisconson?

  • @williamjwagener because taintz keeps bringing it up, and this cases can only in there state. you should know this. will obamas table winning all these cases finally shut you up?

  • @noliesundead Only if Obama's Attonrey and Orly square off in front of a unbiased JURY and the JURY, not a bought of judge decide... I'll accept a unbiased JURY verdict, nothing less. We know from the Richard Fine case [ see: "Free Fine" and "Zerman on Fine"] that the judiciary is highly corrupted.

  • @williamjwagener the problem with this is that to get in front of a jury, you have to have a case. your presidents NBC status was settled with ankney (as was demonstrated by malihi´s notes). the cerified copy of the LFBC is admitted, and really there is nothing else you could find that would disqualify him. you have no case so how in gods name can you get it in front of a jury?

    BTW, if you want to make any headway, dump taitz - she´s useless, and hire a real lawyer

  • @williamjwagener erizo said it far better then I can. If your side's argument is so weak it can't even make it to a jury, why do you keep trying.And you will accept what every other American will, the justice system will not bend to crybabies wanting special privileges.

  • @williamjwagener you´ll accept an unbiased jury verdict?

    so what you´re actually saying is that you´ll never accept a verdict that doesn´t correspond with what you want.

    any jury that was to bring back a verdict that was contrary to your POV would instantly be branded as brought, threatened, or known by your president from when he was at law school.

    you could not accept anything other than victory, because failure would show you´d wasted 4 years on a quixotic quest, and nothing more.

  • @erizo1602 No, NO , NO. You don't get it. Both DNC and RNC are controlled by the

    New World Order, which also runs the corp media , Hollywood, and THEY WANT WAR at any and ALL cost. So they are controlling factor. I would say the same of Mitt Romney and have. Romneys father was b0rn in Mexico. He is also NOT eligible. But Why do we have this same issue in 2008 and again in 2012, when for over 200 years it was NOT an issue. All Presid. were of two parents who were born US citizens .

  • @williamjwagener "Both DNC and RNC are controlled by the New World Order"....so Hulk Hogan, Scott Hall, and Kevin Nash rule the gov't?.

    "Romneys father was b0rn in Mexico"...to two American parents, so under U.S. law he is a NBC and Mitt was born in the U.S. so it does not matter anyways.

    "All Presid. were of two parents who were born US citizens".....except Arthur, Washington, ect you mean?

  • @williamjwagener nice rant, but avoided the subject.

    o.k, i´ll ask you the same as i´v been asking birthers for some time - direct challenge - where exactly does it say in u.s. law an the constitution thet both parents must be NBC for thier child to be NBC.

    likewise, foreigners taking u.s. citizenship are naturalised, people born in the u.s. are NBC. there are just these 2 categories under u.s. law. so where do you placeyour president? he wasn´t born abroad, so that leaves what?

  • @erizo1602 The Birthers are taking the "NBC clause" from the US Constitution, then taking the MINOR v. HAPPERSETT case and interpreting the opinion of the court by SCJ in which he states," It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens." as the definition of the NBC. What there are doing twisting facts to distort the truth, we all know that, how else would you lose to an empty desk. LOL

  • @bulrydrdan Possibly. You make a reasonable assumption. EXCEPT, I witness Federal Judge in Sept. 2009 state in Court that THAT challenge would be decided by a Federal Jury in Jan. 2010, Then 1 month later, after Judge hired a former Obama Law firm lawyer as his personal LAW CLERK, without revealing that,... Fed. Judge David O CARTER said he would decide within 1 day to 1 year if he would Dismiss without a Jury even called. More likely, "they" got to Judge Malihi, like Carter.

  • @williamjwagener the point exactly i made before. if you don´t get the result you want, the judge was `got to´ or some other thing. it wouldn´t matter if jesus christ himself ruled in your presidents favour, you´d consider him `got to´.

    to date no recognised constitutional expert has come forward to support birther claims, and neither has any court. after 100 cases all over the u.s, it should possibly indicate to you that the birthers have nothing. you can´t `get to´ them all.

  • @williamjwagener Possibly, if we knew who "they" were. BHO never had a Law firm, he was a Jr Lawyer for Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland in Chicago, Ill. So you’re saying that everyone in that Law office started the whole incident of every Judge interprating the Law the same way every time. The bottom line is Birthers will never except the truth, if the SCJ came out tomorrow and stated that Obama is a NBC the Birthers will say that there lying or that Obama got to them.

  • @bulrydrdan Ha ha your funny, thanks for th LoL FACT checkers want an explanation

    of how and why BO got away this long using someELSES Soc. Sec. and why WHY would he need to if he got his OWN at birth. Why does he NOT have a Soc. Sec number consistant with Hawaii. Your so blind your slapstick funny. Thanks for the LOL.

  • @williamjwagener Thank but your funnier LOL, why would FACT checker want an explanation? Is FACT checker a Federal Law Enforcement agency that handles SS fraud? Face it your pathetic.

  • @noliesundead That's a pile of b/s. The state has EVERY single record for myself from birth! So we KNOW without reasonable doubt they kept "accurate" records from AT LEAST 1965!

    This whole fiasco is "transparent" fraud"

    DUMB

    ASS

    SHEEP!!!

  • NO FUCKING Comment!

  • Perfect performance by the lawyers!

  • Very compitent lawyers indeed!

  • I watched the video of the court hearing itself, I want to know why the social number he uses on the tax forms is from Conneticut. His tax form flat out said 042. That is slated for Conneticut, was he born there or was that the place where he recieved his citizenship? Were those his tax forms. People need to realize why this requirment is in the constitution to begin with. Would you want someone from a communist country to come over become a citizen for a few years and then run for office.

  • @shumanitutonkaowachi " I want to know why the social number he uses on the tax forms is from Conneticut"... clerical error, the 9 and 0 keys are close to one another. this is common, and it is not Obama ssn anymore. (btw you don't need to get it from the state you live in). and he got his citizenship at birth. like everyone born here.

  • @shumanitutonkaowachi Someone ALREADY DID!!! His name is Barry Soetero!! He is a "citizen" but NOT a "NATURAL BORN" citizen!!

  • @SusanQ83642 who is "Barry Soetero"...can you produce any court or offical docs to support that this person exist? what no? didn't think so.

  • WTF? Just WTF? :lol

  • @noliesundead...wich one dont you understand as being treasonous? NDAA and actually read the bill...and thats just the tip of the iceburg friend... you can deny all you want some of us actually do read the bills and do actually know...its folks who dont pay attention and dont care enough to actually read that are still thinking ooohh ahhh hes so good for us oooh ahhh hes our messiah....and then there are those who just love the socialism so much they just dont care...

  • cdjo23 ,listen nitwit ,this has nothing to do with obama being half arab (luo tribe ,look it up ) .I would much rather have Allen Keyes or pastor Manning as president and Im not a bit religious but at least I can recognize the bravery ,integrity and patriotism of these ACTUAL afro-americans .do you obatzi cretins even know who it was that CHANGED the verbiage in the NDAA act so that it NOW also applies to all US citizens and (guess who ) now also decides exactly WHICH US citizens are suspect ?

  • Thanks Georgia... For proving that American Conservatives are the Biggest Cry babies on planet earth! Also, When will Georgia investigate the Bush election where many ballots were not counted that would have lost him the election!

  • Birthers are the dumbest people alive. In fact the judges decision was exactly the opposite. The judge ruled that Obama was a natural born citizen and he will appear on the Georgia ballot.

  • YES!!! it makes every thing EVERYTHING he did invalid,illegal, and TREASONOUS!!!!!!!

  • and yet he isnt arrested??? am I the only one who realizes a failure to appear gets you a bench warrant for your arrest issued????? not to mention he is obviously guilty of TREASON, along with everyone who has kept this covered up for the last 4 years....look up treason...still punishable by death...WHY IS HE STILL IN OFFICE AND NOT BEHIND BARS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

  • @TimbuckCountry names one treasonous act.

  • They didn't have social security in 1890.

  • @shumanitutonkaowachi A person born in 1890 had this number. They were not given the number at birth. I received my SS in 1984 when I turned 15.

  • @andyjoep

    What was the persons name? Does it return a name in a search of the SSDI?

  • @andyjoep The social security program didn't start until 1936 as part of Roosevelts New Deal.

  • @shumanitutonkaowachi Wow. So you are saying Roosevelt only issued SS numbers to people under 45 at the time. That is strange since the prime earning years have been the 40's for Americans since the turn of the century. I do not understand why he would have wanted all that SS money from people for the last 2 decades of their working careers. Please tell me where you found your research on this. It would be interesting to see.

  • @andyjoep No your earlier response makes sense. Someone who was born in 1890 would have been around 45 or 46 years old during Roosevelts New Deal plan where socials were initiated. He or she would have been on retirement in the next couple of decades or so. Regardless, of anything, Obama and many others are participating, in secret, the direct overthrow of the Constitution. It is time for America to have a come to Jesus meeting.

  • @shumanitutonkaowachi I totally agree. If you really want to see how corrupt of a job the media is doing go visit wellaware1 dot (com). I am not sure all of it is true but some is undeniable.

  • You are not telling the truth. the video went up days before the ruling.

  • Between fast and furious, NDAA, Obama killing US ciitizens, Obama's illegal wars, Obama's forged birth certificate, social security fraud and the fact that Obama is not eligible to be president something has to give soon. I still predict that he'll be removed from office sometime between June - August. If he's not, we can always vote him out of office. Regardless, Obama has committed treason and needs to be held accountable.

  • @Americanrevolution02 LOLOLOL, you are clearly delusional, lol. Look, here's some sound advice and I hope you will take it ASAP! You need to stay on your meds and continue to consult with your mental-health care professionals; seriously!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Stop lying, please. Judge Malihi did NOT order Obama or his records. Orly filled out a pre-signed attorney subpoena (which are usually given to attorneys during hearings...although with the understanding that they won't be misused...which would mean of course that Orly misuses them), with no jurisdiction outside of Georgia.

    And given Georgia's history...well, let's just say that Obama has no chance of winning that state, even if EVERY other candidate were removed.

  • @woodenmajor Don't put words in my mouth. I've never commented one way or the other on F&F. I already told you I don't know enough about it. What does any of that have to do with eligibility?

  • sure arrrogantlyignorant , you support the costitution and the RULE of law ,thats why you agree that the sniveling ,racist f#ktard ,AG holder WILL indeed have to surrender the 65 thousand pages of internal DOJ documents that he has been ILLEGALLY withholding from congress in his pitiful attempt to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and save the lying ,fraudulent ass of his master ,the imperial "chekist in chief " you do understand WHY we have laws granting congressional oversight on the DOJ ,right AI ?

  • @woodenmajor God help us!! How in the world did America get to be so mean, nasty, spiteful, petty and hateful?? The state of affairs is actually worse than the civil rights era of the 1950s & '60s in the deep south in this country; WORSE I tell you! How sad for our country!!! Dear Father in Heaven, hear our prayers, speak to the hate-mongers and make them see the error of their ways! Allow them to see & understand that our Pres. is not heir enemy. I ask this in Jesus' name, Amen!

  • Ron Paul said he is going to stick exactly to the Constitution and hold his conventions in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. He will campaign exactly like George Washington done. run hard in all twelve states, if a state ain't listed in the Constitution, it can go to hell, you ain't American if your state ain't in the Constitution. All you foreigners, read it and weep.

  • I actually heard from House Speaker Boehner likes to play golf on weekends with Obama. Well actually he caddies. After every hole, he loves to wash Obama's balls in the washer , and of course Boehner said Obama is a very likable guy , to play golf with, but off the green, they just can't seem to agree on anything. I don't know if that is they can't agree on Green Jobs ,or smoking the wacky weed. Obama has recently said he enjoyed having Boehner as an ole friend to play with.

  • I can just see a Political Ad coming up , showing Obama on and off the Golf Course, laughing about how he now drives Mitt Romney's dad's Buick. Madonna is going to add a sound track to it based on "Like a Virgin" but it goes " Mitt Romney, Spending Like a Liberal, like a LIB LIBERAL < Not the very first time, spending like a liberal..... ( then Obama comes off the fairway doing a Michael Jackson touch me not. )

  • Ron Paul said he is the Master at Debate, Master of debate, Master debate ? Newt don't mind Ron being the showman, but Newt just wished Mitt would jerk off.

  • Comment removed

  • Ron Paul said we should complain to the world about how China is selling us back all our computers, silicon chips and replacement parts. When asked what were the replacement parts, Ron Paul said, " Livers and Kidneys. " Ron Paul said Americans need to catch a second breath, but not with someone else' s lungs. China will sell anything to us, if we sold them Manhattan , before 911, now they hold a rummage sale. The joke is on them , Ron Paul said, we only paid a few beads for it all.

  • Okay, so I grew up in the age of Lenny Bruce, but it was the age, if one was going to live, that was the time to do it.

  • Ron Paul said that Sharia Law is no good for America, they offered the Sharia Law to China, but the Maoists said it was too liberal for them, In China, they don't just cut off your hand for stealing, they cut out your kidneys and sell them on the world market.

  • Ron Paul said Bush started more wars while the world economy was growing ever faster. But then Obama said if elected , he would bring the troops home, and then the World Economy Collapsed. What we really need is Genghis Khan, like Kerry talked about , that will get the flow of money coming in. We can sell all our land to China and give the commissions to the Indians. We can open a few Indian Casinos in the Middle East and get plenty of Oil standing at the Pass Line at the Crap Table.

  • What the Supreme Court Justices cannot resolve by hearings and the briefing room, we can settle at the Ballot Box, Right now, Mitt Romney would be called the richest one percent'er who ever ran for president, and he done all the things in his own state of Taxachussets that Obama done, been there done that . The Republicans are going to wimp out again, I rather then let Ron Paul run with Rick Santorum, so the ole guy won't last long anyway, and then a true Conservative can be prez.

  • Obama promised he was going to clean up American Politics and cut all the waste. Now It seems he has given funding to the States to build new Sanitary Landfills, which they aptly named "Dump Obama"

  • Scipio Africanus, the Roman General who defeated Carthage in the Punic Wars, they named the whole Continent of Africa after that Roman ,  I wonder what they will name after Obama ? Every time I hear about "Arab Spring" I sort of get confused about the "Irish Spring" I get in the shower.

  • Let's reintroduce the Monroe Doctrine and take over Mexico and Cuba, and knock out the rest of those pesky anti capitalists down in SA. Take what is right, we support the world, we have to take all the babies the poor Mexicans deliver to American Soil, so, let's extend the Border down to the Canal Zone,  and tell everyone take a hike, we pay the bills and so we are entitled to the land, and it's riches, "When in Rome do as the Romans Do" !!!

  •  Anyway , I heard Hillary Clinton say she was going to retire from being Secretary of State under Obama, maybe what she really means is she is going to be on the ballot in Georgia, as a candidate for President. "Hell hath no fury as a woman scorned"

  • After the American Revolution, there were many British Loyalists yet living in America, who were born here. They were not considered "Sons of the Revolution" not "Natural Born Citizens" and so those Loyalists who opposed the American Revolution, their immediate born children, though born here in America, were excluded as Constitutionally not qualified to be President. There is a Political History to the Exclusionary Language, that a Justice of the Supreme Court can hear and decide on.

  • Let's say the Governator, of Caliefornea is Austrian , what if his parents flew to Hawaii and he was born on American soil, would that be a "Determinator" that Arnold could run for president ? No, because Natural Born Citizen is not about where you are born, it is about the Political Loyalties of your two parents. They must themselves be already American Citizens who are Loyal and not Traitors, and then their own child is then called "Natural Born Citizen" that is the definition

  • @CarmineFragione

    First of all, Arnie is not the Governor of CA anymore. Try to keep up with current events.

    Secondly, if he was born in Hawaii, he would be a natural born American citizen.

  • @CarmineFragione Yep, because anyone born in the US can grow up to be President, regardless of your opinion.

  • @bulrydrdan not unless they were residents for the past 14 years and are 35 years old. so again,  your conclusion is abortive.

  • @CarmineFragione OMG who is being glib? One guess, yea it you. 

  • @bulrydrdan I'm just trying to jump on the wagon , if you want open borders and anything goes, it better be going my way....

  • The Historic Prohibition of the Constitution was against precisely anyone who was a British Subject becoming a President, even if the man was born in America. The Americans after the Revolution were still subject to the decree of the British Crown as Rebels and could be hanged by the Crown , if captured. So the Natural Born Citizen was intended to remit any British Subject as unqualified to be President, lest he have a divided loyalty and subversive cause to undermine the American Nation.

  • There are 3 Constitutional requirements to serve as President/VP. Obama meets all 3 easily.

  • @arrrogantlyignorant Just of those people who don't know what they are, can you list them for the people at home....LOL

  • @bulrydrdan

    ROFL!

  • @arrrogantlyignorant yeah , BHO is POTUS but not POTUSA. Remember, Obama said there was "57 states" ??? That happens to be the exact number of the Soviet Socialist Republics. they had the 57, and so I guess your potus slipped a freudian cocktail into the mix.  Maybe BHO was thinking about the Heinz fortune, that made Kerry rich and BHO had the coattails to ride on. 57 Varieties , but one of them is not "Natural Born Citizen" See if you can "catch-up " to that !

  • @CarmineFragione

    Thats one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. So the guy made a mistake on a number.. how in the world can you read all that nonsense into that?

    Again.. speculation is not evidence.

  • According to International Laws, including British Nationality Act of 1948, if your father is a British Subject , and not an American citizen, then the child born to him, is a British Subject, even if the child was borne on American Soil. The Father Rules. So the Legal Description of a Natural Born Citizen of America is that both parents are already American Citizens and are not themselves Foreigners. Obama can elect to be American, but is legally British and so is not Natural Born Citizen

  • The International Treaties of America and Great Britain observed the legality of the British Nationality Act of 1948. So a British Subject who has a son born on American soil, is yet under International Law and Treaties, a British Subject, due to Natural Born Subject to Crown of Great Britain. That makes Obama a British Subject by his Natural Birth by a British Subject who never became an American Citizen. Obama could choose to be only American, but he cannot choose to be Natural Born American

  • The International Treaties of America and Great Britain observed the legality of the British Nationality Act of 1948. So a British Subject who has a son born on American soil, is yet under International Law and Treaties, a British Subject, due to Natural Born Subject to Crown of Great Britain. That makes Obama a British Subject by his Natural Birth by a British Subject who never became an American Citizen. Obama could choose to be only American, but he cannot choose to be Natural Born American

  • @CarmineFragione Simply show me the law and I'll believe you. Speculation is not evidence.

  • The Constitutional requirements that follows "No person shall" amounts to a Restrictive List of DEMANDS upon any citizen to especially be qualified to be President. It would not speak about Natural Born Citizen, if that had a common meaning of anyone born on American Soil. The use of the language was intended to precisely forbid the son of a Foreigner, particularly a Brit, no matter how much the son was born on American soil, to then be qualified to be President. You are all Idiots.

  • @CarmineFragione POSTED THE IWOYTATPSS!!!! If your so smart why is Obama the POTUS and your not. Apparently all you need to to convince 51% of the people on You Tube that you know more that the 51% of the rest of the US. It shouldn't be hard if apparently we are all idiots...LOL

  • @bulrydrdan Look here, you lefty scoundrel, when the Cuban boy arrived on American Soil , and his mother died on the way,  the Democrats all said "the Father speaks for the son" That is international Law. So the intent of the mother to make the Cuban boy free in America , seeing he arrived here by a miracle, you devils sent him back. Now the shoe is on the other foot, A son of a British man is a British Subject and cannot be a Natural Born Citizen of America, who restricted the Brits.

  • When Barack Obama was a child and lived in Indonesia, he was a British Subject and had need of immigration papers to leave Indonesia and return to Hawaii. If he was a Natural Born Citizen of USA, he would not have needed a passport to enter America, after having lived in Indonesia as Barry Soetero

  • The Original Intent of the Constitution was to bar British Subjects from being President of the United States. The British Nationality Act of 1948 was accepted in American Courts at law by Treaties to accept such a child as Barack Obama was in fact a British Subject, regardless of where on earth he was born, his father has status of giving British Citizenship by natural birth, to his son, and so the Original Intent was to prevent a British Subject from being President of the United States.

  • @CarmineFragione

    Again... so you're telling me that McCain, Hillary Clinton, Romney, Ron Paul, John Edwards, Huckabee, Giuliani, Santorum, Gingrich, Cain ........ FBI, CIA, INS, FEC, Dept of Homeland Security, Secret Service, Bush/Cheney etc etc etc never heard of the BNA 1948?

  • @arrrogantlyignorant In the same theme, a person who is dual citizenship as Israeli and American , also cannot be qualified for President, The rulings go to the avoidance of dual loyalties and dual citizenship and primarily , historically , because of the American Revolution and the fact the Americans would be hanged by the British , they made a sanction against anyone who is a British Subject by natural birth by a father who is a British Subject to be President. Period.

  • @CarmineFragione

    There is absolutely no reason why a person born with dual citizenship would not be a natural born citizen of one country or the other.

  • @arrrogantlyignorant That is your opinion, not the Supreme Court's Opinion, in the matter. Your opinion is not worth two cents. No one who is a Citizen of Israel and America can run for President, it violates the Original Intent of the specific qualifications to be President. Also you forget the number of years any native born citizen must live here, so you are wrong , even a Native Born but not living here long enough years, They cannot be President, You lose in Principle

  • @CarmineFragione

    "You lose in Principle"

    Really? Exactly who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave Wash DC?

    Looks like you lose in reality. LMFAO

  • @CarmineFragione No you will lose in theory & fact. FACT BHO farther was a British Citizen & mother an American Citizen and BHO is the POTUS. There is no if's, and's or but's about it. FACT no clear definition have ever been written to Constitutional LAW that a NBC requires 2 parents be US citizens to be POTHUS. The only thing that your stating, is the SCJ opinions to the court to argue for a outcome, in which those argument can be use for a future case, not written law.

  • @bulrydrdan just one memo to throw all your baloney out in the trash, If the BHO had not lived in the country for 14 years,  then he cannot run for President. That is despite your own rant that it does not matter, a native born citizen is natural born and so should all such candidates have a right to be president. But that is a false premise, the reading of the Constitution is about restrictive elements, not inclusive language to congregate the consensus you offer as your pablum.

  • @CarmineFragione Here is part two on that memo-Unless your a SCJ your opinion doesn't matter, as do mine. We could argue all we want, but the FACT is clear, Obama is the POTUS period. And I have never seen or read anything about the present set of SCJ making any remarks about the NBC clause concerning Obama. And unless you can quote an actual Constitutional written law that states that the NBC Clause requires both parent to be US citizens. It will only be an opinion, and yes believed by many.

  • @bulrydrdan The meaning of the Restrictive Demands of the Qualifications are shrouded in History as the impetus against letting any person be president if their own parents, any one of them, both or one, is a British Subject, That is the especially true Historical reason for the specific demands of "Natural Born Citizen" meaning, having no parental attachment to a foreign power, namely Great Britain, the specific intent to restrict persons, was to prevent the son of a British Subject.

  • @bulrydrdan You may think you understand the Law, but the Law does not have to be "Written" it only has to be interpreted and so understood , according to the Decision made by the Supreme Court in Marbury Vs. Madison. It is the thought that counts, not what is written. The Supreme Court acknowledged the purpose of the restrictive demands was to prevent an ally of the British from becoming a President to undermine and destroy the American Nation . BHO is son of a British Subject as same.

  • @CarmineFragione There was a little thing called a verdict with regard to the Marbury v. Madison which was delivered on February 24th, 1803. Now you may not understand the Law but a verdict is a little different than the opinions of the court. As in many cases lawyers use opinion from previous case to make their argument and actual laws but no one has ever been confident of breaking an opinion of the law.

  • @bulrydrdan Then the matter must go to the Supreme Court on the Merits, which is what the Georgia case is based on, merits and not politics. If the Court then lets the matter sit without adding an opinion, then BHO may not be on the Georgia Ballet, but if he goes to Federal Court, the matter goes to the Learned Opinion of the Justices, and that is how Case Law aggregates the gravamen of the Constitutional Requirements to be President. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.

  • I meant Abrogate, not aggregate, but maybe both are fitting, since the matter is in many state courts at present, If the Merits of the Legal Briefs are determined, BHO may not be on one state ballot or many state ballots, as the cases congregate up through the suits at law. Then the Supreme Court can hear the case as it did in the Gore Vs St Florida in 2000, that decided an election going to George Bush, Everyone has an opinion, but not the credentials to issue them.

  • @CarmineFragione

    A serious question for you. Not that I expect you to answer it, since you've ignored all my questions so far.

    If Judge Malihi rules in favor of the President being eligible, will you accept the ruling?

  • @arrrogantlyignorant If the Court rules Obama is a Natural Born Citizen , that settles the Case Law, so I agree, because that is the Process. but now I put it back to you, if the Judge rules Obama is not qualified to be on the Ballot in Georgia because his father was not American but a British Subject, and so BHO is also a British Subject, , then will you agree that does agree with the International Laws and Treaties between Great Britain and the United States ? Will you agree if it is so ?

  • @CarmineFragione

    First of all... Judge Malihi is not going to rule on whether or not Obama is a NBC. NO Administrative Law Judge would do that. The most he can do is make a recommendation to the GA SoS one way or the other.

    Based on that, I don't have to comment on your BNA 1948 nonsense. I live in America. I could give a sh!t what Brit law says.

    Also I accept the ruling either way because I support the Constitution and the rule of law.

  • @arrrogantlyignorant so you support the "anchor babies" routine, where foreigners come illegally to America, have the kid, and sign up for food stamps ? Okay, but how come we don't just barge into Mexico and take all the oil, doesn't the doorway swing both ways, if we have to support the anchor babies, at least throw in the oil, I pay too much at the pump for all this one sided nonsense.

  • @CarmineFragione

    Where exactly did I say I support anchor babies? Where have I ever said a word about food stamps? Don't put words in my mouth that I never said.

    And you have the gall to call ME an idiot?

    ROFLMFAO

  • @arrrogantlyignorant I call you an idiot to get a rise out of you, Now, your beloved BHO, he has gone around the world and kissed every ring and bowed the knee to everyone but a real American. How about Obama standing in front of the White House and bowing down to the Tax Payers ??? He bowed to every King and Pharaoh, and the Dear Leader, and the Chairman, and so forth, But he has never bowed down to me, so I don't think I will vote for him, he can take all the bows he wants

  • @CarmineFragione

    "Then the matter must go to the Supreme Court on the Merits"

    There are no merits. Speculation, hearsay, spun half truths and fictional made up nonsense is not evidence.

  • @CarmineFragione I do agree on that, this must go to the Supreme Court, I just hope they don't throw it out, like all the other, they threw out due to lack of merit. I just hope it can get that far, because if the Georgia court rules in favor of Obama the backseat lawyers will never shut up on one side. And the others will post, "I told you so."

  • @bulrydrdan Okay, we agree on the correct process. Perhaps the time has come for the Constitution to let Naturalized Citizens be President, since the American Revolution and the threat by the British Crown was a very long time ago, But the Law is the Law, both the Letter and the Spirit, and that is why some people go to Law School and eventually are nominated for the Supreme Court, Until it is clarified, I think Obama was not really qualified in the traditional historic sense.

  • @CarmineFragione Hell no, I want the NBC clause to be defined as a child who has 2 parent that are citizens. I do not believe that any foreign born citizens should hold any office. I do not believe that children of illegals should be POTUS either, I hope this goes that far so we can get a final decision, because every lawyer and professor I know has said it over & over again, "there is not written Constitutional law that give the definition of the NBC clause."

  • @bulrydrdan I am just stroking you now. I am tired, If the world hated the Romans, it is because they were superior and in power, that made people envy them. American ought to be King of the Hill, and not bow to anyone, so let them hate us, as long as they respect our power, As Obama goes around apologizing for us, to make the world love us, it sounds like Obama wants the death of America, which is bound to finally make those who hate us , rejoice and dance in their streets,

  • @CarmineFragione Hay don't get me wrong I don't like Obama's politics either, I'm a Ron Paul supporter. But the law is the law and Obama is POTUS, not by my choice.

  • @bulrydrdan Well we need a few jokes about Ron Paul. Ron says we cannot afford any more wars. The enemy keeps charging us Interest on the money we spent fighting them. If we don't fight, they will all go broke....

  • @arrrogantlyignorant On the extra count of the specific number of years that the Natural Born Citizen must actually live in the Continental United States, you see the Original Intent of the Constitution is to be extremely RESTRICTIVE and not INCLUSIVE, by your standards, a Natural Born Citizen who never lived in the States, ought to be eligible for President, but you are wrong on that count, so the evidence is weighing you are wrong on the other account, because you are an Idiot.

  • @arrrogantlyignorant Do you remember the Cuban child who came to Florida at the behest of his mother, who became deceased ,and the Democrat leaders said "The Father is Cuban, and thus the father rules over the citizenship of the child, the child belongs with his father" So the Cuban kid was sent back to the Communist Prison Camp to please the Internationalist on the Far Left, called Democrats, Now the Chickens come home to Roost. ???

  • Had ANY other person committed the fraudulant acts that this charlatain has, he would have long since been arrested, tried & be sitting in a Federal penetentiary. I TRY to give him benefit of doubt out of respect for the Office BUT the bottom line IS he is a liar & a Fraud - never was a REAL Atorney & did not attend Harvard School of Law. His so-called degree came via donation to Harvard in the amount of 20 Million dollars. Check around - you'll find the details & facts. He is a Criminal period

    <