Very badly mislabeled, and contains a number of factual inaccuracies (eg, the LHC did *NOT* "go live" in 2008. It hasn't really "gone live" yet, and will likely not do so until 2014 or 2015. (Yes, that's the actual schedule for getting it up to full power.) THEN (and ONLY then) will we see some real "results".
Yes, yes, yes, I am very well aware of the fact that this was supposed to be humor. It failed.
Grade: F (non-factual facts and non-funny humor). Stars: 1.
@Xerxes4242 says, "Based on your comments, you took it seriously.". Just what part of my paragraph, "Yes, yes, yes, I am very well aware of the fact that this was supposed to be humor. It failed." did you *NOT* understand? Based on your comments, you have repeatedly failed to actually read the comments you are replying to. That is unfortunate, because it makes a perplexing garble out of your responses.
@Xerxes4242 : If I did not "even watch" the video, why/how do you think I was quoting from it? Did you even *READ* the comment you're replying to? As for "it's clearly a joke", did you not even read what I said about that? You know, when I said "Yes, yes, yes, I am very well aware of the fact that this was supposed to be humor. It failed. " and "Grade: F (non-factual facts and non-funny humor). Stars: 1". Remember reading that? Scroll up!
I can't believe this. Is this really what scientists say about science?
FilmPA86 1 year ago
On 10 September 2008 the first protons completed their first lap. That is all.
ryoko90210 1 year ago
Very badly mislabeled, and contains a number of factual inaccuracies (eg, the LHC did *NOT* "go live" in 2008. It hasn't really "gone live" yet, and will likely not do so until 2014 or 2015. (Yes, that's the actual schedule for getting it up to full power.) THEN (and ONLY then) will we see some real "results".
Yes, yes, yes, I am very well aware of the fact that this was supposed to be humor. It failed.
Grade: F (non-factual facts and non-funny humor). Stars: 1.
lonewolfintj 1 year ago
Did you even watch the video? It's clearly a joke
Xerxes4242 1 year ago
@Xerxes4242 says: "it's clearly a joke". No. It's clearly someone's *ATTEMPT* at a joke. It failed. Badly.
lonewolfintj 1 year ago
Based on your comments, you took it seriously. You failed badly.
Xerxes4242 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Xerxes4242 says, "Based on your comments, you took it seriously.". Just what part of my paragraph, "Yes, yes, yes, I am very well aware of the fact that this was supposed to be humor. It failed." did you *NOT* understand? Based on your comments, you have repeatedly failed to actually read the comments you are replying to. That is unfortunate, because it makes a perplexing garble out of your responses.
lonewolfintj 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Xerxes4242 : If I did not "even watch" the video, why/how do you think I was quoting from it? Did you even *READ* the comment you're replying to? As for "it's clearly a joke", did you not even read what I said about that? You know, when I said "Yes, yes, yes, I am very well aware of the fact that this was supposed to be humor. It failed. " and "Grade: F (non-factual facts and non-funny humor). Stars: 1". Remember reading that? Scroll up!
lonewolfintj 1 year ago