It didn't look like such a hard landing to me, I think the fact that there wasn't such a strong flare was probably what made it look like that. Would guess that the fact it was a dirt strip + the C-17 being a heavier aeroplane means that a stronger noticeable flare wouldn't be practical. Have no idea though, would like to hear from anyone in the know :)
this video shouldn't be here! now the enemy is sure to do fucked up things on there dirt fields grass fields and ETC. to prevent C-17's landing in there country. LOL
Last night I had a weird dream. I was in an A330 and the plane went over a deep cliff, then dived straight down into the middle of it. The plane hit the runway at the bottom nose-first but then immediately came horizontal again. The last and truly weirdest thing was that on the 10-metre long runway, the plane managed to stop completely from full speed. And it bumped into a pizza man at the end of the runway.
@dude193547 I've nothing to do with the services but I would imagine its a self-protection thing. If you're flying low over Afghanistan in a bigass transport jet you'd want the plane on the ground and stopped as quickly as possible. That's my guess anyway.
@dude193547 They're istructed to do so when landing on a short runway. Flaring before touchdown would give the plane a shorter part of the runway to stop.
@dude193547 In a "high risk" landing like that with limited runway length it is much safer to get it down firmly and quickly so you can start braking. Also, the loose surface is much more forgiving than tarmac for the initial touchdown so it wouldn't have been too bad in the cockpit
I feel sorry for the guys that either have to wash the gear or the guys that do the 60 day lube on it... I hate doing either anyway, but I bet it's a nightmare with all that dirt... Ours are nasty after a few paved runway landings. (I'm a crew chief)
@LeexPixel It was smooth enough, they landed on a dust runway. And they cant have so big speed at short runways, so they needed to have a steep landing :P
@JeremyB787 Those planes are made for this. They lands often when it is a war in the same country, to deliver things to the military. The same with the c- 130 :P
A friend of mine flew one of these in Afghanistan much like this one. For the size of the plane, they are surprisingly easy to fly ( for the experienced pilot ) and is overall just a great plane.
@Byron10301 I called that particular jet a piece of crap. I would know because I work on them and that exact jet in this video is a POS. You are fucking retarded.
@Hoopr32 Oh, and we were supposed to infer all of that from your original comment? ... when someone reads "this jet is a piece of crap" , isn't it probable that they will understand it to mean "C17 is a piece of crap"? ... what part of that makes me retarded?
@911wuzjews Why would the Jewish people cause 9/11? After all the hardships they have faced over many thousands of years, especially during and after the second world war, why would they go and cause 9/11?
@RedRoosterRoad I can only tell you the reasoning behind the theory , i don't believe it myself so please, remember this isnt me saying this, im just relaying their retarded theory.
Israel , a country full of jews, alone in the middle east. Needs to get U.S backing there asap to secure it's interests in Iraq ect. Theyre even calling for strikes on Irans nuclear reactors.
They actualy do call a lot of americas shots in the middle east.
@TheSonnytsar Maybe Americans will create such a bomb.When explode above the ground creates a vacuum.But the shock wave does not kill-only the wind.A cloud of sand would give effective camouflage.Special Forces landed by parachute in the cloud of sand.I rescue the hostages.This bomb can blow up the city Somali Pirates ;D
I would of thought that the c-17s engines would of broken, as lots of dust would damage it. I guess this from the volcano ash clouds, if this is such a amazing plane thats Verry safe they should make a passenger one.
I'm pretty sure he landed so hard because the runway is short and it's dirt so they try to get the wheels on the ground as fast as possible instead of flaring which might make him float down the runway a little bit.
C-17 does everything. Takes off in very short distances, climbs quick, slows down even faster, now it off roads. I think the C in C-17 is named after Chuck Norris.
@RavenofShalott I have owned windows, run Linux, and own a mac. Yes, their little extra features and programming make boot-up times long and simply slow it down completely. They are also susceptible to attacks. I owned windows 7, and it wasn't that bad. But macs are about three times as fast, and they last. I love OS X Lion. It is secure, intuitive,fast, and productive. Though expensive, the OS and computer are well worth the price... no weird errors or flaws like windows.
@RavenofShalott Also, I don't normally see a 60+ year old woman making comments on youtube, no offense to you. My age is fake on my profile, and I hope to someday have a career with Lockheed-Martin. :)
@RavenofShalott Are you calling me stupid? Lol. You are right, If you want to have an argument, all you have to do is look up the facts you need to know, and there you are. If you asked me a question and I didn't know the answer, I could simply look it up. But you have to have a little understanding to piece it all together.I'm not what you'd call an expert, but I do know quite a bit about military aircraft.
@wrigleyx No, because the engines aren't sucking air in as hard, and are moving too fast for the sand to make it in. Some sand will get in, but the engines are built to withstand this. :)
Such a cloud of sand could be created artificially . Bomb explosion in the air.Shock wave would not kill .Just create a cloud of sand.Special Forces could hide in the cloud... ..Or rescue hostages.
@Mitchel130BHD There was a C-5 Galaxy that flew over my house the other day. I was at my desk and I heard this jet getting closer and closer and closer. For a second I thought a plane was going down into the neighborhood. I went outside and saw this gigantic, screaming, C-5 fly over my house at what looked like only several hundred feet high. Someone said the C-5 has the same engines as a 747-400? I can't believe that. 747's engines don't make that kind of noise.
@enigma800 I'm not a C-5 maintainer and not an engines guy (I work on the flightline on a fighter base) but I have flown on a C-5 and saw many of them flying. I can't say they have the same engines as a 747-400 or not, but personally I don't think so. C-5s can carry a massive amount of weight. It's a two floor aircraft, the first floor is cargo and the second floor is the passenger area. The engines are extremely powerful. If they are the same as a 747-400, they are at least modified
(4) If you are given a retired C-17 to be your home, how will you re-design it to make it a comfortable home for yopurself? (eg. add a swimming pool, a wing garden...etc)
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
@ThePACortez You mean where drone attacks are murdering innocent people because some JEWS blew up the towers on 911? Americans really are gullible as fuck. Go murder the fuck out of people in ten different countries, because some rat faced kikes blew up the towers and the jewish media blamed arabs. Bowing to your jewish leaders won't stop the next attack, which will be far worse than 911. The five mossad jews caught dressed like arabs on 911 are probably laughing today. SubvertedNation/net
Like the Mars landing
gupiao998 1 week ago
Comment removed
sinojtjej 1 week ago
thats gotta be a noisy pass by from your standpoint hahah
Mysticlambo 1 week ago
make note to clean the air filters
Mast3rChef119 2 weeks ago
Abdul, the run way needs raking.
Leaveatrailoflies 2 weeks ago 3
Only Americans.
GIT-R-DONE!
xSonsofSunsx 3 weeks ago
can't breathe... cough cough cough
85transam 3 weeks ago
It didn't look like such a hard landing to me, I think the fact that there wasn't such a strong flare was probably what made it look like that. Would guess that the fact it was a dirt strip + the C-17 being a heavier aeroplane means that a stronger noticeable flare wouldn't be practical. Have no idea though, would like to hear from anyone in the know :)
Slasherzza 3 weeks ago
god that was a hard landing!
i guess that the bigger the aircraft and the heaver it is the faster it must be to stay airborne
nickbeets1 4 weeks ago
Tried to this in flight simulator...didn't work
LeGrandAnonyme 1 month ago
McGuire- Represent!
HeyItsMeBC 1 month ago
Like a Boss!
MrChugwater 1 month ago
this video shouldn't be here! now the enemy is sure to do fucked up things on there dirt fields grass fields and ETC. to prevent C-17's landing in there country. LOL
nephestopoles19 1 month ago
@nephestopoles19 Yeah, because they'll land a $220 millions aircraft full of cargo or troops on an unsecured, uninspected, unimproved runway.
HeyItsMeBC 1 month ago
Last night I had a weird dream. I was in an A330 and the plane went over a deep cliff, then dived straight down into the middle of it. The plane hit the runway at the bottom nose-first but then immediately came horizontal again. The last and truly weirdest thing was that on the 10-metre long runway, the plane managed to stop completely from full speed. And it bumped into a pizza man at the end of the runway.
Silverstarthewarrior 1 month ago
He made a SANDSTORM...
MetrolinkTrain638 1 month ago
all military person on ground go to bath now
rusher80 1 month ago
Sweet video! Would make some epic ANET shots
PhotographerJan 1 month ago
Does anyone know if this is an actual airstrip, because I'd like to land my C-17 here on X-Plane :)
Kristiants1 1 month ago
Spettacolare!
EurostarAltaVelocita 1 month ago
Hard landing yes, for a reason yes. Combat landing AKA Spiral descent of dumb AKA unrestricked descent!!
jayc3169 1 month ago
Chuck Norris uses two C17s as rollerskates.
JAMamation 2 months ago
Comment removed
JAMamation 2 months ago
There are 18 people did not like the video I wonder why
rack55you 2 months ago
he came down HARD.
BankofStank 2 months ago
Pilot got balls!
BlackRegment8 2 months ago
who needs to flare when you have a globemaster as your friend? =)
semaex 2 months ago
wow
langeminerva 2 months ago
Taliban can lick it clean.
bordercollie1975 2 months ago 2
Like! O.O
mlevolutionx 2 months ago
16 people were hit by the sand
TheRedtoro 2 months ago
WOW O.o
pimmetje97 2 months ago
that was a rough landing geezzz
KumAndGo84 2 months ago
looked like a hard landing....he just slammed it :s
dude193547 2 months ago 34
@dude193547 I've nothing to do with the services but I would imagine its a self-protection thing. If you're flying low over Afghanistan in a bigass transport jet you'd want the plane on the ground and stopped as quickly as possible. That's my guess anyway.
deathstardisco 2 months ago
@dude193547 They land with high speed so if they are attacked they can take off fast.
nielscarp 1 month ago
@dude193547 They're istructed to do so when landing on a short runway. Flaring before touchdown would give the plane a shorter part of the runway to stop.
YoungPilot350 1 month ago
@dude193547 it wasnt a hard landing, it was more like a stalled touchdown so that it stops early before it does off the planned strip
razgriz786 1 month ago
@dude193547 In a "high risk" landing like that with limited runway length it is much safer to get it down firmly and quickly so you can start braking. Also, the loose surface is much more forgiving than tarmac for the initial touchdown so it wouldn't have been too bad in the cockpit
THEMAN080 3 weeks ago
@dude193547 probably a short field landing, he landed hard so he didn't float in ground effect for an extra 1000 feet.
CaptainMetalwing 6 days ago
Perfect short field landing. Planting it on like he did disperses a LOT of energy and makes the stopping distance very short.
mattcfi 2 months ago
landing not good :)
djorganista 2 months ago
your moma is sooo fat but luckily that can still pick her up.
nolifegeeks 2 months ago
How do you avoid debris / FOD to the engines in this environment?
radtech21 2 months ago
and when is takin off it's like racing car Subaru Imprenza
MrKadaboy1 2 months ago
woow amazing
ebnroog 2 months ago
but can it take off?
PrivatePeterson 2 months ago
How did i get here from dune buggies?
MrSup2121 2 months ago
forgot to flare lol
landmark425 3 months ago
I feel sorry for the guys that either have to wash the gear or the guys that do the 60 day lube on it... I hate doing either anyway, but I bet it's a nightmare with all that dirt... Ours are nasty after a few paved runway landings. (I'm a crew chief)
bcope4u 3 months ago
Touchdown at 0:16 wasn't so smooth like you guys think...LMAO
LeexPixel 3 months ago
@LeexPixel It was smooth enough, they landed on a dust runway. And they cant have so big speed at short runways, so they needed to have a steep landing :P
airplanesimen 3 months ago
fsx landing.
airbornerat 3 months ago 2
Chuck 17
churupaca1 3 months ago
An awesome aircraft. Have been up into the cockpit of one of these beauties. At one of the Air Tattoo's @ RAF Fairford. It is very impressive!!!
whitewingsrich 3 months ago
Can anybody tell me why the plane had to land on this dirt runway?
JeremyB787 3 months ago
@JeremyB787 Those planes are made for this. They lands often when it is a war in the same country, to deliver things to the military. The same with the c- 130 :P
airplanesimen 3 months ago
quietly briliant
vinceqwerty100 3 months ago
Who's gonna clean this sh1t?
QeXeQ 3 months ago 66
@QeXeQ Your mom or wife. After they make me a sandwich ;D
rollercoasterfreak36 2 months ago
@rollercoasterfreak36 sorry freak, no sandwitch for virgins
QeXeQ 2 months ago
@QeXeQ xD I love replies like that :P thanks for playing
rollercoasterfreak36 2 months ago
@QeXeQ Mother nature. Who else?
death759 2 months ago
@QeXeQ you gonna clean it baby...
If you are not going to do it ...so what they do there ...they have to return home...soon)))
tv1be1healthy1 1 month ago
A friend of mine flew one of these in Afghanistan much like this one. For the size of the plane, they are surprisingly easy to fly ( for the experienced pilot ) and is overall just a great plane.
ufofan1980 3 months ago
This jet is a piece of crap.
Hoopr32 3 months ago
@Hoopr32 your comment is a piece of crap
Byron10301 3 months ago
@Byron10301 You are clearly retarded.
Hoopr32 3 months ago
@Hoopr32 You're the one who called the C-17 a "piece of crap" ... :D no good sir, YOU are clearly retarded ... I have evidence!
Byron10301 3 months ago
@Byron10301 I called that particular jet a piece of crap. I would know because I work on them and that exact jet in this video is a POS. You are fucking retarded.
Hoopr32 3 months ago
@Hoopr32 Oh, and we were supposed to infer all of that from your original comment? ... when someone reads "this jet is a piece of crap" , isn't it probable that they will understand it to mean "C17 is a piece of crap"? ... what part of that makes me retarded?
Byron10301 3 months ago
@Byron10301 You seem mad. Why do people like you always take the internet so serious? You need to get out of your basement.
Hoopr32 3 months ago
@Hoopr32 :) ok man you got me ... this whole time you were acting stupid just to piss me off ... you totally got me. 1-0 for you.
Byron10301 3 months ago
@Byron10301 You seem mad.
Hoopr32 3 months ago
@Hoopr32 Eat my dick :D
Byron10301 3 months ago
Fuckin badass pilots
jellyjamacain 3 months ago
A.k.a., the Haboob landing.
mxochimera 3 months ago
this is so great
halfgrec 3 months ago
Wouldn't the sand and dust ruin the turbines?
adam4397 3 months ago
@911wuzjews Why would the Jewish people cause 9/11? After all the hardships they have faced over many thousands of years, especially during and after the second world war, why would they go and cause 9/11?
RedRoosterRoad 3 months ago
@RedRoosterRoad I can only tell you the reasoning behind the theory , i don't believe it myself so please, remember this isnt me saying this, im just relaying their retarded theory.
Israel , a country full of jews, alone in the middle east. Needs to get U.S backing there asap to secure it's interests in Iraq ect. Theyre even calling for strikes on Irans nuclear reactors.
They actualy do call a lot of americas shots in the middle east.
Antifaith29 3 months ago
AMAZING video you did a great job on it Added as favorite!!
MrSTRIKER52 3 months ago
FOD walk anyone?
65woodsnake 4 months ago
That's not a landing, that's hitting the ground.
onecheman 4 months ago
now that's a landing
jonanlsh 4 months ago
Love these planes. Which they visited nz more often
ALLAHDELLAH 4 months ago
Takes way too long to stop... C130 FTW
ranger8997 4 months ago
@ranger8997 check out some of the C-17 demos on reverse thrust...this baby can go backwards(reverse)
jainish007 4 months ago
dammit guys i just finished sweeping!!!!!!!!
RIcciAir 4 months ago
best landing video ive ever seen ...coooool man...:)
MrDouglasdc3 4 months ago
Saaaaafe!
pedinkus 4 months ago in playlist AERO#1
Beautiful...
danielrichardbond 4 months ago
You gotta have some balls to make that landing.
fincasandaluciablog 4 months ago
i had always thought this plane would need special runway to take off.. unbelievable. May be they put special tires for this kind of runway.
fslcanuck 4 months ago
C-17 OffRoad
polop611 4 months ago
Suck to be downwind!
modest80884 4 months ago
THE FUCK!
Seabass9211 4 months ago
"HOW TO MAKE AN ARTIFICIAL SANDSTORM "
TheSonnytsar 5 months ago 49
@TheSonnytsar Maybe Americans will create such a bomb.When explode above the ground creates a vacuum.But the shock wave does not kill-only the wind.A cloud of sand would give effective camouflage.Special Forces landed by parachute in the cloud of sand.I rescue the hostages.This bomb can blow up the city Somali Pirates ;D
Sebol811 2 months ago
Oh... They just landed to kabul interational airport.
Artist334 5 months ago
lol dust pollution... awesome:D
anurek123 5 months ago
makes me wonder how would they be able to get it out.
85LARGE 5 months ago
DUSTY runway
pasakari 5 months ago
looked like a hard landing. wow nice airplane shocks. ^_^
cheeseburger9418 5 months ago
das a big arse plane
nydrell 5 months ago
I would of thought that the c-17s engines would of broken, as lots of dust would damage it. I guess this from the volcano ash clouds, if this is such a amazing plane thats Verry safe they should make a passenger one.
madhas1998 5 months ago
@madhas1998 Volcanic ash melts inside of jet turbines forming glass, i'm no expert, but I dont believe dirt has the same effect.
dimesach 5 months ago
I'm pretty sure he landed so hard because the runway is short and it's dirt so they try to get the wheels on the ground as fast as possible instead of flaring which might make him float down the runway a little bit.
64Aggressor 5 months ago
great as it may seem, this rough landing will tell sooner than later on the aircraft's structural integrity...
Ilyumini 5 months ago
Who needs flare? I'm a c-17!
emp29 5 months ago
you call that a run way?????
qteapie88 5 months ago
now who's the black guy they gonna get to clean that?
swagger897 5 months ago
Wow fantastic!
TheAhdacadabra 6 months ago
That is a lot of dirt behind the plane!
concorde232 6 months ago
THEM PAKISTANI TOO CHEAP TO BUILD A CONCRETE RUNWAY
nishal1425 6 months ago
@nishal1425 Are you too lazy to use proper capitalization or read descriptions?
Arcticviper 6 months ago
that looked really rough haha
maccas1329 6 months ago
thats amazing
unixkid52 6 months ago
That is one outstanding video. Wouldn't want to land behind that one.
ezfishfinder 6 months ago
Boeing C17 is such an epic plane. It can land on almost anything.
LegoAwesomePictures 6 months ago
That's some kind of landing. Love to see the takeoff
morrisstudios 6 months ago
what a bad and hard landing??? Is it because of the cross wind (note the camera noise)?
burcmm 6 months ago
who washes that?
lifesnojoke333 6 months ago
C-17 does everything. Takes off in very short distances, climbs quick, slows down even faster, now it off roads. I think the C in C-17 is named after Chuck Norris.
IPGAuto 6 months ago 117
@IPGAuto im pretty sure its cargo lol
sktfourlif 6 months ago
@IPGAuto yeahn the cuck noiris-17
Folger8192 5 months ago
@IPGAuto And look at his size! Amazing maneuverability.
MrMoronime 5 months ago
@IPGAuto Only Chunk Norris can drive C-17.
maxvideostorage 5 months ago
@maxvideostorage
it's fly
cruisingcody 4 months ago
@IPGAuto Yeah the Chuck-17 for sure.
thefogster61 4 months ago
What does it take to fly one of those beasts?
ericatomic934 6 months ago
@ericatomic934
Balls and a lot of training.
Jesus45U 6 months ago
I wanto to see that beast taking off!
nicolas016 6 months ago
TeenFlyer95 and ThePACortez are some racist mothafuckers
SimulationGarage 6 months ago
@RavenofShalott I have owned windows, run Linux, and own a mac. Yes, their little extra features and programming make boot-up times long and simply slow it down completely. They are also susceptible to attacks. I owned windows 7, and it wasn't that bad. But macs are about three times as fast, and they last. I love OS X Lion. It is secure, intuitive,fast, and productive. Though expensive, the OS and computer are well worth the price... no weird errors or flaws like windows.
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
@RavenofShalott Thank you!
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
Comment removed
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
the dislikes are from the ppl who have to clean the plane ?
IDONTKNOWWHYTOO 7 months ago
@RavenofShalott And why do you hate windows?
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
@RavenofShalott Also, I don't normally see a 60+ year old woman making comments on youtube, no offense to you. My age is fake on my profile, and I hope to someday have a career with Lockheed-Martin. :)
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
@RavenofShalott Are you calling me stupid? Lol. You are right, If you want to have an argument, all you have to do is look up the facts you need to know, and there you are. If you asked me a question and I didn't know the answer, I could simply look it up. But you have to have a little understanding to piece it all together.I'm not what you'd call an expert, but I do know quite a bit about military aircraft.
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
Comment removed
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
@RavenofShalott Cool! It's nice to see someone who knows what they're talking about, not a swearing 12 year old!
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
This is TK!
TheWizardbc 7 months ago
That looked like a really hard and firm touch down as it should be.
MichaelNewmann 7 months ago
im sure that landing takes some damage..
wszq13 7 months ago
@wszq13 no, it doesn't, it was made to do this!
joek0617 7 months ago
won't the sand came in the engines?
wrigleyx 7 months ago
@wrigleyx No, because the engines aren't sucking air in as hard, and are moving too fast for the sand to make it in. Some sand will get in, but the engines are built to withstand this. :)
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
@iceagescrat1 ok thanks! i was wondering about that for the landing and the take off :)
wrigleyx 7 months ago
@wrigleyx Yup! :)
iceagescrat1 7 months ago
@wrigleyx Even if the sand does get in the engines im pretty sure they are designed to withstand sand injection. I also think their tested for it.
fromrussiawl1 6 months ago
@fromrussiawl1 yes right, there's maybe an enjection systeme.
wrigleyx 6 months ago
If they didn't know where they were before they sure as hell know where they are now.
TaxfreeSVT 7 months ago
Such a cloud of sand could be created artificially . Bomb explosion in the air.Shock wave would not kill .Just create a cloud of sand.Special Forces could hide in the cloud... ..Or rescue hostages.
Sebol811 7 months ago
Why is WALL-E in Afghanistan?
palakaman 7 months ago
Soooo, why are we doing FOD checks again??? "But that little pebble in your tire could damage the A/C engine!" Whatever...
ilangsfs 8 months ago
beautifull aircraft ......... india is going to get 10 of these planes. C-17 will soon serve the indian airforce.
sakthicoool 8 months ago
BEAUTIFULL
LOl dit you guys see how epicly big is the c5 galxy dam it can cargo a A10, M1A1, Pave low seriously thats big
Mitchel130BHD 8 months ago
@Mitchel130BHD There was a C-5 Galaxy that flew over my house the other day. I was at my desk and I heard this jet getting closer and closer and closer. For a second I thought a plane was going down into the neighborhood. I went outside and saw this gigantic, screaming, C-5 fly over my house at what looked like only several hundred feet high. Someone said the C-5 has the same engines as a 747-400? I can't believe that. 747's engines don't make that kind of noise.
enigma800 7 months ago
@enigma800 I'm not a C-5 maintainer and not an engines guy (I work on the flightline on a fighter base) but I have flown on a C-5 and saw many of them flying. I can't say they have the same engines as a 747-400 or not, but personally I don't think so. C-5s can carry a massive amount of weight. It's a two floor aircraft, the first floor is cargo and the second floor is the passenger area. The engines are extremely powerful. If they are the same as a 747-400, they are at least modified
zoomie6421 7 months ago
Mini Sand storm.
Sebol811 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we love flying?
(2) Why do we like to build big jet?
(3) Why do we like to pilot big jet?
(4) If you are given a retired C-17 to be your home, how will you re-design it to make it a comfortable home for yopurself? (eg. add a swimming pool, a wing garden...etc)
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 8 months ago
Why is he slamming it to the ground like that, no flare?
CroTomCat 8 months ago
@CroTomCat Short field maybe, more interested in a short landing than a soft one.
nate4594 7 months ago
8 people live in Abbottabad Pakistan.
ThePACortez 8 months ago 30
@ThePACortez 10 people are baja 1000 drivers and want this for there next rig
TheSpeakers20 6 months ago
@ThePACortez You mean where drone attacks are murdering innocent people because some JEWS blew up the towers on 911? Americans really are gullible as fuck. Go murder the fuck out of people in ten different countries, because some rat faced kikes blew up the towers and the jewish media blamed arabs. Bowing to your jewish leaders won't stop the next attack, which will be far worse than 911. The five mossad jews caught dressed like arabs on 911 are probably laughing today. SubvertedNation/net
911wuzjews 4 months ago
@hondacl0n3 what? The B-52 is a long-range bomber not a cargo/troop transport plane (C-17)
Zelda079 8 months ago
Honestly, The C-17 or Antanov should be the next B-52...my opinion.
hondacl0n3 8 months ago
حط سيارتك وراح تشوف التغبير الصح
rayan2018 8 months ago
@rayan2018 did you actually write something or are you just trying to get your pen to work?
unapro3 7 months ago
Hah sand storm!
PilotX44 8 months ago
not healthy for the gear, if you ask me..
SAB113 8 months ago
@SAB113 Or the dirt in the engines
PilotX44 8 months ago