*sighs* shame about the YouTards arguing below cluttering up the comments. 34 seconds of funny toys talking and youre desperately whining. Get a life.
To get my message out, Marvel and DC both RULE equally. If you try to compare you have doomed us all. PUT THIS IN FIVE MARVEL/DC VIDEOS, GET THE MESSAGE OUT
@WassupDL66 actually animated films Dc has better movies. than marvel ever could dream of. the animation is flawless and the story well speaks for itself. Marvel has more live action movies that made more money.
@WassupDL66 ur such a troll lol, i have a variety of shirts. Dc and Marvel alike. i love both companies and their comics equally. Im a spiderman fan. im a batman fan. does it really matter lol calling me a Dc noob. how old are u. on second thought dn't answer that. because really your opinion doesn't concern me o.O if relpy to me in a vulgar manner im just gnna laugh it off. i dn't do fights over youtube. utterly pointless.
@psychfanatic22 LMAO.You just don't understand. He's Batman. He is still able to hold his position among the greatest heroes from DC and Marvel despite being completely human. A great role model. Plus everyone has their own opinion.Highly advanced intellect, Strategy, Detective skills, Martial arts expert, Professional escape artist, Tech. expert , Master of criminology etc...He's iconic and no matter what you think, he'll always be the ***damn Batman. {Marvel and DC rock!}
@swirledelixir1 And was once even singled out for a yellow ring. You know he's awesome when violent, fear-mongering aliens are jockeying to recruit him.
"DONT READ THIS CUZ IT REALLY WORKS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO OVER 3 VIDEOS OR YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW THAT YOU HAVE STARTED READING THIS DONT STOP. THIS IS SCARY, POST THIS TO OVER 5 VIDEOS in 143 MINUTES WHEN YOUR DONE PRESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BUT IT REALLY WORKS
well TECHNICALLY they were up against stardust in 2007, but who the hell knew that was a dc/vertigo movie? let alone a comic book movie? or, s**t! does anybody even knew of that damn movie!?
Where as Batman is about a self-deluded vigilante (read: criminal) who just so happens to have the money to have a bunch of high tech gadgets (which are boring). In fact, he's got some serious mental issues, he sees himself as two separate people, Bruce Wayne and Batman. He's as nutty as Two Face, as delusional as Joker, and as rich as Tony Stark. Let's not get into the company he keeps, like the villain Superman.
But not all turn to being criminals, going by the letter of the law, and that's exactly what Bruce did. He is a criminal, a vigilante who metes out his own justice because he thinks he is above the law, and if he thinks he is above the law, imagine what he thinks of the average person. I don't think Cyclops has issues, unless you count being a boyscout an issue.
@Dracoa79 I don't condone or condemn Batman or any other superhero. I'm just saying the have reasons for becoming what they are. Cyclops lost his saw his parents die in a plane crash and lost his brother at the same time. True he found them later in life but it did give him the fundamental personality of his stick in the ass attitude, guilt complex and need to control his team environment.
@Dracoa79 He doesn't think he's above the law. He helps the Gotham PD. He's even allies with Police Commisoner Gordon. Everyone thanks him for what he does to help people. If Batman was a criminal, he would murder, steal, kidnap, and do everythink a criminal does. Criminals don't put other criminal in jail.
Then why doesn't he obey the law? Vigilantism is against the law, and that is exactly what Batman is, a vigilante. Yes, he puts other criminals in an asylum, that just so happens to have a revolving door (both literal and figurative), but that doesn't mean he himself doesn't engage in the criminal activity of vigilantism.
@Dracoa79 That's the whole appeal of Batman, though. Who wants an all-good, law-abiding, black-and-white hero with an indisputable set of morals? Batman is interesting because he's NOT a good guy. And he knows it, too. The Joker(many other villains as well, but most notably the Joker) is constantly telling Batman that he's just as insane as they are, and that he belongs in Arkham Asylum as much as they all do. Comics aren't always about super-humans doing the "right" thing and being perfect.
@Dracoa79 I don't care about Superman, he doesn't interest me at all. But Batman is a great character. 'Bat-shit insane'? That's the whole point. While reading, you actually have to ask yourself 'IS he the good guy?' and if a comic book can get you to question your own morals like THAT, I'd say it's a pretty good read. Besides, he's not a real person. He's a fictional character; you don't have to agree with his morals and actions. You just have to be interested by the storyline and concepts.
Well, given that he engages in criminal activity, I would say that no, he's not a good guy, he's a criminal, no better than Joker or any other villain he has. Batman has NEVER made me question my morals, so I'd say that it's a pretty bad read. Interested by the storyline and concepts? Nope. Can't say I am. I find them boring and cliche.
@Dracoa79 What's cliche about a superhero who's insane? And, for the third time, THAT'S THE POINT. The fact that he's 'no better than Joker or any other villain' is practically the theme of the entire series. He's never even killed a person. I say that qualifies as 'good' in the objective sense of the word, so for most people, there would be an inner conflict of 'Is he the hero or the bad guy?'. It's fine if it doesn't interest you, but your opinion has so far only been supported by fallacies.
What's not cliche about a vastly intelligent hero that solves crimes? And the fact that he's not killed anyone isn't exactly in his favor, it says that he WANTS to keep destroying Gotham in his little games with the likes of the Joker. The fact that he hasn't ended Joker, and keeps putting him in Arkham, which has a literal revolving door, says there is no inner conflict, just that he's yet another bad guy.
@Dracoa79 It's much more than that. He's not just a flat-out stereotypical 'bad' guy. The fact that he doesn't kill people is all part of an illusion that his ego has built up to convince himself that he is still good, and still better than all of the villains and criminals. He does what he does to hold onto his perception that his actions are right and benefit the greater good, not because of some intricate plan to keep villains on the street. It's all to convince himself, not to doom Gotham.
Without the criminals on the street, he has no way to convince himself, with the criminals on the street, Gotham is doomed. He WANTS Gotham in constant danger so he can keep up the appearance of being a good guy. You are looking too deeply into it. This is one of those cases where the simplest answer is the right one.
@Dracoa79 Ah, but he's not conscious of that. He doesn't see that everything he's been doing is actually harmful. (Not exactly EVERYTHING, as he did protect the city from people such as Ra's al Ghul, who would've destroyed Gotham with or without Batman's existence.) Maybe it doesn't interest you, but he is definitely more complex than most comic heroes. And the last thing that character development in a comic book needs is simplicity. There's enough of that in comics already.
One act of pure good does not undo all the bad he's done. And seriously, would you want Batman as a friend? I wouldn't. He keeps files on all his friends on how to neutralize/kill them, "just in case".
@Dracoa79 It's not supposed to undo all the bad, and you're right, I wouldn't want him as a friend. As I've said before, that is the point. I guess if there are no more arguments to refute then I'm done.
One last thing, you have admitted that he is as bad as the villains he fights, so just how can you call him a hero, superhero or otherwise? I do, in a way, feel bad for him though. I mean, he lives in a world full of idiots who are fooled by a simple pair of glasses frames.
@Dracoa79 Well, he's bad in a different sense. But yes, I personally wouldn't call him a hero, but that is what he has objectively been designated as. He isn't considered a DC villain, he's given the label of 'superhero', so I guess it's just what I consider correct and what I use.
So when you think about it you don't consider him a hero of any sort, but otherwise you just go along with popular opinion? Just a question, not an attack.
@Dracoa79 No, I wouldn't say that. I wouldn't really consider any comic book superheroes as actual heroes. I just use the word because it's what he's called. Like I said, I don't consider any of them heroes by my personal definition of the word, but it's just a comic book universe. I don't know how else to explain it, I guess.
@Brickicle You two are retarded.....how is batman the cause of mayhem in Gotham?....how is he not an iconic figure that does everything humanly possible to help the city of gotham?....hes an extremist yes but he gets the job done, WITHOUT murder...as for keepingfiles on evereyone....HEEEEEELLLLLLL yes keep a file on superman...motherfucker went crazy several times and guess who was ready?....thats right, old bats
@SelmanAGA1 Have you read any of the comics? His villains do half of the stuff they do just to get on his nerves. Especially the Joker. He blatantly says it about a thousand times. And he doesn't really do everything humanly possible, considering the fact that he's rolling in money and keeps a lot of it to himself. I understand he has an image to upkeep, but I'm sure he could sacrifice quite a lot of his luxuries.
Btw, 'You two are retarded' = great opening statement.
And nothing Bats does is either legal or good. As a vigilante his actions are illegal, and by being "Batman" he is directly responsible for worse criminals flooding Gotham, which is bad. Batman started an arms race and the city of Gotham paid the price.
so it is recommended to not fight crime because it will fight back? the escalation that batman faces is far beyond anything that would happen in the real world. most of his problems arise just because the writers needed a problem for batman and thus created one out of thin air.
Or it's recommended that you let those who are properly trained to fight crime to do their jobs as opposed to taking vengeance like a selfish, spoiled little child. There are other routes Bruce could have gone, instead he CHOSE to be a criminal and essentially declare war on Gotham. If there were no Batman, his rogue's gallery wouldn't exist and the city would be MUCH better off, as bad as it might be. Batman fights a war he can NEVER win.
If he really wanted to make Gotham a better place, why not become a cop, or a DA, or even an FBI agent? Why not use his money to better the city as opposed to a vengeance fueled quest? I mean other than he seeks personal closure at the expense of the rest of the world. His actions show he doesn't care about Gotham.
His rogue's gallery comes in part from people who see him as I do, an insane dangerous criminal.
As for suspension of disbelief, that's done through Supe's.
If he didn't care then he wouldn't be so fanatical about no guns and killing. he limits himself preciesly so that it doesnt' become an out of control quest for vengence. He does use his money to better the city. He funds all sorts of charities and job building efforts, and uses his Wayne persona in combination with batman to fight corporate level crime and corruption.
No guns? Really? He's no stranger to using guns of all types. Ok, so maybe more recent versions (like Bat-God) don't, but Batman has used guns many times for many different purposes. As far as killing goes, you don't think that killing Joker would be a good thing? Or is he so mentally unstable that that one sacrifice would lead him to keep killing? Out of control vengeance quest? He has that already with being Batman, often to the detriment of Bruce Wayne.
hold now, you're reversing position. killing joker is the job of a jury and executioner is it not? are you implying that Batman could be either a cop or the Punisher and be better than he is now?
Fighting crime is the job of the police isn't it? That doesn't stop Batman from doing their job for them. And I guarantee, if Batman did kill Joker, word would spread and Gotham would be cleaned up in short order. And yes, I am saying that Bruce Wayne as a cop or a "Punisher" type character WOULD be better than he is now.
You asked for suspension of disbelief, I told you where it comes in, it's not with Batman.
Since Punisher is not a "hero" in the strict sense of the word, yes. Batman is supposed to be a hero, Punisher is not. They get held to different standards because of that.
Batman's suspension of disbelief comes in that he "learned every martial art to ever exist" in a matter of years, and mastered them. Basically he's a "normal" guy who does impossible things with no explanation as to why he should be able to.
ah. I see. you take issue with vengeance being portrayed as heroic. completely understandable. Still he has many heroic qualities. One may very well be able to argue that he is mentally unwell, but he does have compassion and selflessness.
In batman begins his desire to murder his parent's killer was portrayed as a negative which he had to overcome. His fight in that and in TAS is more about trying to be worthy of them than avenging them.
Bruce may have some compassion and selflessness, but Batman never shows it.
So instead of killing the surrogate killers of his parents (deep in his mind you know that's how he sees all criminals, and in fact asks himself "Is this Joe Chill?" for anyone he doesn't know the id of, well in more recent times anyways, since in most of Bat's history he's caught Joe Chill), he settles for bashing their faces in? How is causing severe bodily harm better?
@Dracoa79 Yes, instead of fighting the Joker over and over Punisher-Batman will be facing a different grunt, punk, dealer etc. every week...just like the Punisher does.
There are different ways to reach the same end goal but neither of them will make the city streets safe & clean. It all comes down to what character you prefer more, not which is more efficient imo.
The difference is that Punisher doesn't limit himself to one city, like Batman does for the most part.So it's only natural that Punisher would have different people he's taking out all the time. You localize him to a single city like Batman, and the city will be cleaned up.
@Dracoa79 When I read the Punisher many years ago he did indeed go global. Yet there were many stories of him being in New York for the longest of times taking out crime bosses and assassins and they were just temporary bandages.
Realistically speaking a society will always have it's loose canons. If you take them out more will appear.
If I'm not mistaken, Punisher had established crime bosses moving into New York, such as King Pin. But if you were to put him in Gotham, it might be a little while before he acted, but that would just be to choose his first target. If said target was Joker, he'd be going through mooks and working his way up, if it was Batman, the Bat-Family would be in for a world of hurt. Punisher is ruthless, Batman is compassionate. That's the major difference between them.
For the charities and job building, that's all well and good, but does absolutely nothing to stop the crime element or remove the literal revolving door from Arkham.
Suspension of disbelief when it comes to Superman is a humanoid alien with heat vision, super strength, flight, ice breath, and whatever other powers he's been given, including lifting a mountain of the stuff that's supposed to kill him.
And yet they are making another Batman movie where you just know that he's going to be the hero, not just another criminal. Sure you could compare him to Robin Hood in that they are both criminals, but at least RH is charismatic, loved by the people, and fighting a far greater evil than Batman does. All Batman fights are petty criminals, disturbingly insane, but still petty criminals.
@Dracoa79 Whether you believe Batman is a better or a worse hero than any of the FF members doesnt concern me.I still prefer Batman.And the one thing i will say is that the FF movie sucked.It had the potential of being a good film but they failed.Direct yourself to Marvel/DC: After Hours #4 the part with luthor and doom speaking.Its a clear summation of what was wrong with the film
I don't deny that the FF movies had their flaws,, they didand they were big ones too, in fact I'm not even a big FF fan, but Batman Begins and Dark Knight had the same flaw that the first Hulk movie had, and it was a doozy, they were too dark. There was only one Batman that stood out to me as being just the right balance of darkness and lightness, the one with Jack Nicholson as The Joker.
@Dracoa79 Oh true.I love TDK but imo it wasnt a superhero film as much as it was a character study.But yeah the Tim Burton film would have been the best Batman film if there wasnt one single flaw.
Batman killed.
Batman never kills
Its an issue TDK addresed and imo makes it a better adaptation.
But "sigh" i would lie if i didnt say i didnt like the Tim Burton film just as much
I see Batman not killing as one of his major flaws. He is incapable of doing what must be done. No, I don't think he should go out killing ever criminal he comes across (barring himself of course), but for the ones who keep getting out like Joker, the one's who will never learn. Eventually enough is enough. Even Marvel's Wolverine as Old Man Logan was able to do what had to be done and he decapitated Red Skull who was the President at the time. Batman couldn't have done that.
@Dracoa79 Best way to describe the difference between Batman and Wolverine is this: They both stared into the abyss,but when the abyss looked back Logan blinked.
Logan aint exactly a role model hes a stone cold killer and he knows it but because of such he seeks redemption for his sins which what makes him a escellent character as well.Batman on the other hand knows that if he goes down that path theres no going back by becoming a murderer he becomes what he fights and he will never allow that
So Batman is incapable of seeking redemption for his sins? That's not exactly role model material either. Besides, do you really think anyone in Gotham would blame Batman if he did kill off all those "super villains" who only showed up after he got started? It could be argued that if there were no Batman, there would be no Joker, there would be no Two Face, or any of the others. That means that Batman is indirectly responsible for what they do.
@Dracoa79 Batman didn't LITERALLY create supervillains. That's only true in the sense that it happend because batman beating up regular people got boring after awhile, so a writer came up with a unique villain, then these unique villains starting coming up again because they were popular. In fiction someone like Ras would still be around. If anything you can blame the city of gothem for creating batman and everyone else. these people would still be around, just not caught for a long time.
@Dracoa79 The point is each character has its own pros and cons some argue that because Batman or Superman wont kill or just appear invulnerable/incorruptable and such makes them less appealing.But isnt that the point of After Hour?These characters werent made to be relatable they are symbols the stuff of legends.Their own existence is meant to inspire people to try and do better in their life.Just because a character doesnt appeal to someones standard doesnt degrade the character
Well, when it comes to Supes, I have to agree with Lex. Why aspire to anything with Superman around? He's already inhumanly better at everything, so humans rely on him, taking away their drive. Superman is really the villain of that story. And Bats? Well, he's got as many mental issues as his enemies do, in fact it could be said that each of his enemies reflects one or more of his issues, and that his battling them is him battling himself.
@Dracoa79 You know what i was going to write another long post but the fact is im tired of this arguing.Point in matter if you dont like any of the DC comics characters why are you commenting about them?Let this crap rest.We both agree to disagree and leave it at that
@Dracoa79 that's ridiculous, it's so ridiculous the movie doesn't even feel the need to combat it. None of that has to do moral behaviour. Superman aspires to do and be good, He didn't cash in, or try to take over. Jets are much faster than people and that doesn't stop people from trying to be fast on foot or bikes or cars ect. He inspires by being helpful compassionate. He's someone that helps old ladies crossed the street amplified.
@ZomgRuler To be fair V is part of the Vertigo imprint, not a classic "DC" release. Watchmen actually was under the DC imprint, so while it was a comic book movie, it doesn't fit the "Marvel vs DC" proper matchup.
Aquaman? Really? I'm not even going to have this discussion with you. And as for the Flash, I'll say this:
His only power is that he can move really, really fast right? I'm sorry, but what would happen if he tripped and fell? He'd most likely hit his head and die. When you can be killed because you tripped over a curb, you're lame. Bottom line.
Lame, BigNast. An Aquaman movie would have the potential for incredible visuals, epic battle sequences, and even an environmental angle. Basically, it's "Avatar" underwater. *grins*
As for the Flash, obviously the laws of physics work a little differently for him; otherwise, he wouldn't be able to see or breathe when he runs. In his case, it's his character that makes him an interesting subject for a movie hero.
Actually, the characters are what makes ANY movie interesting (or not).
the people at DC are so stupid, they don't realise what potential their whole host of superheroes have. I mean, the DCAU is renowned for it's quality and mature writing, and that was just a series of cartoons. If they would use materials from that and make movies as good as the DCAU was for cartoons it would be great. I mean at Marvel we have spidey, fantastic 4, x-men, Hulk, so muuch. at DC it's just Batman... and supes but he doesnt compare with Nolan's batman.
Green lantern wonder woman flash, look we have to stop fighting over whose better, we can call it spade to spade DC is (or at least I feel) a little more classier than marvel but marvel has far more mature story writing.
just the way Bruce Tim and Paul Dini created the DCAU starting with batman, if DC has any brains they'll convince Nolan to make a DCMU: DC Movie Universe. He has the brains and the talent to do not just a good batman... but a good DC Universe in movie form. I mean only then would Marvel and DC be comparable terms of movies.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMARROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO ATLEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS
I've heard that the Green Lantern movie is expected for 2011, so it looks like Jonah Hex and Losers will have to contend with Iron Man 2 and Kick-Ass. Not good odds.
its the competion in 2005 the first fantastic 4 went agenst batmman begins and batman begins was better but in 2007 there was no competion for marvel with fantastic 4 lol please excuse my spelling hope u can understand this keyboard isnt making sense except this sentence lol
Marvel better watch out though, if DC does release Super Max into theatres I think it would dwarf other movies featuring wealth of superheroes like x-men. Why do I think that? Well it will have alot of DC villain cameos, even a few from batman, and we all love batman. Not to mention Green Arrow is in it. I can just imagine some kid being like "Mommy, I want to see the movie with Robin Hood breaking out of jail! PLEASE MOMMY!"
That's FOX, not Marvel. Marvel prbably just wishes FOX, Sony & LionsGate would give them their characters back like Universal did with the Hulk. Those 4 studios collectively have made 15 live action movies based on Marvel characters and only 4 of them don't suck(X1, X2, SM1, SM2).
You got that Silver Surfer from Burger King.
skaterh00dy 1 week ago
Ugh, Rise of the Silver Surfer was terrible.
MrMViceroy 2 weeks ago
Batman:Trump Card. YOU CANNOT BEAT THE BATMAN!(DC sucks other than him though. but i hate the FF)
guy21063 3 weeks ago
Im Batman
TotaLegoMadness 3 weeks ago in playlist Hi, I'm a Marvel...and I'm a DC: Round One
Guys we all have our favorite hero's but i like dc batman cause he is epic and powerful a powerman
Dancinmonkeezsidekic 1 month ago
Is the referee Sweeney Todd?
Glorfindel9357 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ZERO HOUR, ZERO HOUR, ZERO HOUR, ZERO HOUR Post this on six of his vids and get him to post a new one
MultiTobyProductions 2 months ago
the debates here are like watching jersey shore
SmashLiXs 2 months ago in playlist More videos from ItsJustSomeRandomGuy
lol
batmanpackersrock 2 months ago
Human torch XD
torchwoodlover12 2 months ago
LOL give it up bruce!
*sighs* shame about the YouTards arguing below cluttering up the comments. 34 seconds of funny toys talking and youre desperately whining. Get a life.
Tashyp 2 months ago 3
I'm Batman
Nite09Shade 2 months ago
I think bats was just feeling sorry for them
after 2k5.
ninjaspartankx55 3 months ago
To get my message out, Marvel and DC both RULE equally. If you try to compare you have doomed us all. PUT THIS IN FIVE MARVEL/DC VIDEOS, GET THE MESSAGE OUT
MultiTobyProductions 3 months ago
hi, i'm marvel. i'm marvel. i'm marvel. I AM BATMAN!!
DimkaWOR 4 months ago
green lanter was alright but i love marvel
teensuper101 4 months ago
GUYS END THIS DEBATE! WE ALL KNOW DC SUCKS AND THAT BATMAN IS THE ONLY GOOD MOVIE... DC SUCKS AT MOVIES MARVEL IS BETTER... SO STFU
WassupDL66 4 months ago
@WassupDL66 actually animated films Dc has better movies. than marvel ever could dream of. the animation is flawless and the story well speaks for itself. Marvel has more live action movies that made more money.
playadelrey100 2 months ago
@playadelrey100 Says someone wearing a Superman shirt. Stfu DC noob
WassupDL66 2 months ago
@WassupDL66 ur such a troll lol, i have a variety of shirts. Dc and Marvel alike. i love both companies and their comics equally. Im a spiderman fan. im a batman fan. does it really matter lol calling me a Dc noob. how old are u. on second thought dn't answer that. because really your opinion doesn't concern me o.O if relpy to me in a vulgar manner im just gnna laugh it off. i dn't do fights over youtube. utterly pointless.
playadelrey100 2 months ago
lol at comments below this one...xD this is half the reason why i'm watching these videos... for the debates xDD
Panpafii 5 months ago
didn't spiderman 3 come out in 2007
DeadStealth25 6 months ago
im batman
Tdak1128 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why does everyone like batman and think he is the best superhero of all time cause he isn't he sucks
psychfanatic22 8 months ago
@psychfanatic22 Shut Up! Batman's epic!
superdupergamer12345 8 months ago 40
@superdupergamer12345 thank you
digioverlord 7 months ago
Comment removed
swirledelixir1 7 months ago
@psychfanatic22 LMAO.You just don't understand. He's Batman. He is still able to hold his position among the greatest heroes from DC and Marvel despite being completely human. A great role model. Plus everyone has their own opinion.Highly advanced intellect, Strategy, Detective skills, Martial arts expert, Professional escape artist, Tech. expert , Master of criminology etc...He's iconic and no matter what you think, he'll always be the ***damn Batman. {Marvel and DC rock!}
swirledelixir1 7 months ago
@swirledelixir1 And was once even singled out for a yellow ring. You know he's awesome when violent, fear-mongering aliens are jockeying to recruit him.
megagrey 7 months ago
@megagrey Lmao....Good point!
swirledelixir1 7 months ago
batman can suck my Deadpool balls
TheJohntimby 9 months ago
thie thing is ugly lmao i just saw a video that is kinda like robot chicken its called
pow-real rangers
theres a part one and part two to it, both clips are hilarious.
but anyways i love the fat singing guy in this video best lol.
kissandra71 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"DONT READ THIS CUZ IT REALLY WORKS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO OVER 3 VIDEOS OR YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW THAT YOU HAVE STARTED READING THIS DONT STOP. THIS IS SCARY, POST THIS TO OVER 5 VIDEOS in 143 MINUTES WHEN YOUR DONE PRESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BUT IT REALLY WORKS
austnm1 11 months ago
Batman pwns. im pretty much a marvel fan but batman is the best superhero of all time.
dukeyxxyz 1 year ago 2
Incredible...an intellectual conversational debate concerning the intricacies of a superhero's mindset on a 30-second comedy video.
Seriously, chill, people.
therealMrA 1 year ago 54
@therealMrA welcome to the youtube comment section my friend...
digioverlord 7 months ago
I'm Batman..... so random
NonstopRam 1 year ago
the only awards that the FF would win would have to be by default. They were poor.
danrml 1 year ago
well TECHNICALLY they were up against stardust in 2007, but who the hell knew that was a dc/vertigo movie? let alone a comic book movie? or, s**t! does anybody even knew of that damn movie!?
JokerFan1138 1 year ago 2
@JokerFan1138 wait! wats stardust?
cloneboysfan6757 1 year ago
@xxalaxx41
imo, Fantastic Four was a far better movie overall. Batman is just completely overrated.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 That's HILARIOUS. I don't even like Batman begins but Fantasic Four is a terrible movie and a lame-ass couple of heroes.
SilverSilhouette 1 year ago
@SilverSilhouette
Where as Batman is about a self-deluded vigilante (read: criminal) who just so happens to have the money to have a bunch of high tech gadgets (which are boring). In fact, he's got some serious mental issues, he sees himself as two separate people, Bruce Wayne and Batman. He's as nutty as Two Face, as delusional as Joker, and as rich as Tony Stark. Let's not get into the company he keeps, like the villain Superman.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 All super heroes have issues and who wouldn't at seeing their parents murdered in front of them?!
JessiV2 1 year ago
@JessiV2
But not all turn to being criminals, going by the letter of the law, and that's exactly what Bruce did. He is a criminal, a vigilante who metes out his own justice because he thinks he is above the law, and if he thinks he is above the law, imagine what he thinks of the average person. I don't think Cyclops has issues, unless you count being a boyscout an issue.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 I don't condone or condemn Batman or any other superhero. I'm just saying the have reasons for becoming what they are. Cyclops lost his saw his parents die in a plane crash and lost his brother at the same time. True he found them later in life but it did give him the fundamental personality of his stick in the ass attitude, guilt complex and need to control his team environment.
JessiV2 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 He doesn't think he's above the law. He helps the Gotham PD. He's even allies with Police Commisoner Gordon. Everyone thanks him for what he does to help people. If Batman was a criminal, he would murder, steal, kidnap, and do everythink a criminal does. Criminals don't put other criminal in jail.
Hotmanlion12 7 months ago
@Hotmanlion12
Then why doesn't he obey the law? Vigilantism is against the law, and that is exactly what Batman is, a vigilante. Yes, he puts other criminals in an asylum, that just so happens to have a revolving door (both literal and figurative), but that doesn't mean he himself doesn't engage in the criminal activity of vigilantism.
Dracoa79 7 months ago
@Dracoa79 Because it's a comic book, not a police procedural. Rule of law is secondary to rule of cool.
horngatekeeper 7 months ago
@Dracoa79 vigilantism ROCKS cops suck
bbphnix 7 months ago in playlist Hi, I'm a Marvel...and I'm a DC: Round One
@bbphnix
Yeah, but Bruce Wayne, and therefore Batman, sucks also.
Dracoa79 7 months ago
@Dracoa79 That's the whole appeal of Batman, though. Who wants an all-good, law-abiding, black-and-white hero with an indisputable set of morals? Batman is interesting because he's NOT a good guy. And he knows it, too. The Joker(many other villains as well, but most notably the Joker) is constantly telling Batman that he's just as insane as they are, and that he belongs in Arkham Asylum as much as they all do. Comics aren't always about super-humans doing the "right" thing and being perfect.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
Apparently DC fans do. Ever hear of Superman? Marvel's hero's have their problems, but at least they aren't, pardon the expression, bat-shit insane.
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Dracoa79 I don't care about Superman, he doesn't interest me at all. But Batman is a great character. 'Bat-shit insane'? That's the whole point. While reading, you actually have to ask yourself 'IS he the good guy?' and if a comic book can get you to question your own morals like THAT, I'd say it's a pretty good read. Besides, he's not a real person. He's a fictional character; you don't have to agree with his morals and actions. You just have to be interested by the storyline and concepts.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
Well, given that he engages in criminal activity, I would say that no, he's not a good guy, he's a criminal, no better than Joker or any other villain he has. Batman has NEVER made me question my morals, so I'd say that it's a pretty bad read. Interested by the storyline and concepts? Nope. Can't say I am. I find them boring and cliche.
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Dracoa79 What's cliche about a superhero who's insane? And, for the third time, THAT'S THE POINT. The fact that he's 'no better than Joker or any other villain' is practically the theme of the entire series. He's never even killed a person. I say that qualifies as 'good' in the objective sense of the word, so for most people, there would be an inner conflict of 'Is he the hero or the bad guy?'. It's fine if it doesn't interest you, but your opinion has so far only been supported by fallacies.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
What's not cliche about a vastly intelligent hero that solves crimes? And the fact that he's not killed anyone isn't exactly in his favor, it says that he WANTS to keep destroying Gotham in his little games with the likes of the Joker. The fact that he hasn't ended Joker, and keeps putting him in Arkham, which has a literal revolving door, says there is no inner conflict, just that he's yet another bad guy.
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Dracoa79 It's much more than that. He's not just a flat-out stereotypical 'bad' guy. The fact that he doesn't kill people is all part of an illusion that his ego has built up to convince himself that he is still good, and still better than all of the villains and criminals. He does what he does to hold onto his perception that his actions are right and benefit the greater good, not because of some intricate plan to keep villains on the street. It's all to convince himself, not to doom Gotham.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
Without the criminals on the street, he has no way to convince himself, with the criminals on the street, Gotham is doomed. He WANTS Gotham in constant danger so he can keep up the appearance of being a good guy. You are looking too deeply into it. This is one of those cases where the simplest answer is the right one.
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Dracoa79 Ah, but he's not conscious of that. He doesn't see that everything he's been doing is actually harmful. (Not exactly EVERYTHING, as he did protect the city from people such as Ra's al Ghul, who would've destroyed Gotham with or without Batman's existence.) Maybe it doesn't interest you, but he is definitely more complex than most comic heroes. And the last thing that character development in a comic book needs is simplicity. There's enough of that in comics already.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
One act of pure good does not undo all the bad he's done. And seriously, would you want Batman as a friend? I wouldn't. He keeps files on all his friends on how to neutralize/kill them, "just in case".
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Dracoa79 It's not supposed to undo all the bad, and you're right, I wouldn't want him as a friend. As I've said before, that is the point. I guess if there are no more arguments to refute then I'm done.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
One last thing, you have admitted that he is as bad as the villains he fights, so just how can you call him a hero, superhero or otherwise? I do, in a way, feel bad for him though. I mean, he lives in a world full of idiots who are fooled by a simple pair of glasses frames.
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Dracoa79 Well, he's bad in a different sense. But yes, I personally wouldn't call him a hero, but that is what he has objectively been designated as. He isn't considered a DC villain, he's given the label of 'superhero', so I guess it's just what I consider correct and what I use.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
So when you think about it you don't consider him a hero of any sort, but otherwise you just go along with popular opinion? Just a question, not an attack.
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Dracoa79 No, I wouldn't say that. I wouldn't really consider any comic book superheroes as actual heroes. I just use the word because it's what he's called. Like I said, I don't consider any of them heroes by my personal definition of the word, but it's just a comic book universe. I don't know how else to explain it, I guess.
Brickicle 6 months ago
@Brickicle
Fair enough.
Dracoa79 6 months ago
@Brickicle You two are retarded.....how is batman the cause of mayhem in Gotham?....how is he not an iconic figure that does everything humanly possible to help the city of gotham?....hes an extremist yes but he gets the job done, WITHOUT murder...as for keepingfiles on evereyone....HEEEEEELLLLLLL yes keep a file on superman...motherfucker went crazy several times and guess who was ready?....thats right, old bats
SelmanAGA1 5 months ago
@SelmanAGA1 Have you read any of the comics? His villains do half of the stuff they do just to get on his nerves. Especially the Joker. He blatantly says it about a thousand times. And he doesn't really do everything humanly possible, considering the fact that he's rolling in money and keeps a lot of it to himself. I understand he has an image to upkeep, but I'm sure he could sacrifice quite a lot of his luxuries.
Btw, 'You two are retarded' = great opening statement.
Brickicle 5 months ago
@Dracoa79
"legal" and "good" are not synonyms. Many crimes against humanity are committed by lawmakers.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@waldoman7
And nothing Bats does is either legal or good. As a vigilante his actions are illegal, and by being "Batman" he is directly responsible for worse criminals flooding Gotham, which is bad. Batman started an arms race and the city of Gotham paid the price.
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79
so it is recommended to not fight crime because it will fight back? the escalation that batman faces is far beyond anything that would happen in the real world. most of his problems arise just because the writers needed a problem for batman and thus created one out of thin air.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@waldoman7
Or it's recommended that you let those who are properly trained to fight crime to do their jobs as opposed to taking vengeance like a selfish, spoiled little child. There are other routes Bruce could have gone, instead he CHOSE to be a criminal and essentially declare war on Gotham. If there were no Batman, his rogue's gallery wouldn't exist and the city would be MUCH better off, as bad as it might be. Batman fights a war he can NEVER win.
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79
whether or not he's the one to do the job is irrelevant to the escalation point.
as for properly trained, well Bruce is trained well enough to do a lot more than the cops can, and without ever killing.
his rogue comes from ridiculous events like falling into a vat of acid. no one could predict that batman would lead to that sort of thing.
are there a few hypocricies in batman? yes. there's supposed to be some small suspension of disbelief though. you're too harsh on him.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@waldoman7
If he really wanted to make Gotham a better place, why not become a cop, or a DA, or even an FBI agent? Why not use his money to better the city as opposed to a vengeance fueled quest? I mean other than he seeks personal closure at the expense of the rest of the world. His actions show he doesn't care about Gotham.
His rogue's gallery comes in part from people who see him as I do, an insane dangerous criminal.
As for suspension of disbelief, that's done through Supe's.
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79
If he didn't care then he wouldn't be so fanatical about no guns and killing. he limits himself preciesly so that it doesnt' become an out of control quest for vengence. He does use his money to better the city. He funds all sorts of charities and job building efforts, and uses his Wayne persona in combination with batman to fight corporate level crime and corruption.
I have no idea what you mean with superman.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@waldoman7
No guns? Really? He's no stranger to using guns of all types. Ok, so maybe more recent versions (like Bat-God) don't, but Batman has used guns many times for many different purposes. As far as killing goes, you don't think that killing Joker would be a good thing? Or is he so mentally unstable that that one sacrifice would lead him to keep killing? Out of control vengeance quest? He has that already with being Batman, often to the detriment of Bruce Wayne.
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79
hold now, you're reversing position. killing joker is the job of a jury and executioner is it not? are you implying that Batman could be either a cop or the Punisher and be better than he is now?
superman is irrelevant.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@waldoman7
Fighting crime is the job of the police isn't it? That doesn't stop Batman from doing their job for them. And I guarantee, if Batman did kill Joker, word would spread and Gotham would be cleaned up in short order. And yes, I am saying that Bruce Wayne as a cop or a "Punisher" type character WOULD be better than he is now.
You asked for suspension of disbelief, I told you where it comes in, it's not with Batman.
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79
you attack batman for working outside the law and yet approve of Punisher more than him?
If suspension of disbelief comes in to play for one superhero there's no reason why it can't be a part of all of them, and of course it is.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@waldoman7
Since Punisher is not a "hero" in the strict sense of the word, yes. Batman is supposed to be a hero, Punisher is not. They get held to different standards because of that.
Batman's suspension of disbelief comes in that he "learned every martial art to ever exist" in a matter of years, and mastered them. Basically he's a "normal" guy who does impossible things with no explanation as to why he should be able to.
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79
ah. I see. you take issue with vengeance being portrayed as heroic. completely understandable. Still he has many heroic qualities. One may very well be able to argue that he is mentally unwell, but he does have compassion and selflessness.
In batman begins his desire to murder his parent's killer was portrayed as a negative which he had to overcome. His fight in that and in TAS is more about trying to be worthy of them than avenging them.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@waldoman7
Bruce may have some compassion and selflessness, but Batman never shows it.
So instead of killing the surrogate killers of his parents (deep in his mind you know that's how he sees all criminals, and in fact asks himself "Is this Joe Chill?" for anyone he doesn't know the id of, well in more recent times anyways, since in most of Bat's history he's caught Joe Chill), he settles for bashing their faces in? How is causing severe bodily harm better?
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79 Yes, instead of fighting the Joker over and over Punisher-Batman will be facing a different grunt, punk, dealer etc. every week...just like the Punisher does.
There are different ways to reach the same end goal but neither of them will make the city streets safe & clean. It all comes down to what character you prefer more, not which is more efficient imo.
Bloggerboy1000 5 days ago
@Bloggerboy1000
The difference is that Punisher doesn't limit himself to one city, like Batman does for the most part.So it's only natural that Punisher would have different people he's taking out all the time. You localize him to a single city like Batman, and the city will be cleaned up.
Dracoa79 5 days ago
@Dracoa79 When I read the Punisher many years ago he did indeed go global. Yet there were many stories of him being in New York for the longest of times taking out crime bosses and assassins and they were just temporary bandages.
Realistically speaking a society will always have it's loose canons. If you take them out more will appear.
Bloggerboy1000 5 days ago
@Bloggerboy1000
If I'm not mistaken, Punisher had established crime bosses moving into New York, such as King Pin. But if you were to put him in Gotham, it might be a little while before he acted, but that would just be to choose his first target. If said target was Joker, he'd be going through mooks and working his way up, if it was Batman, the Bat-Family would be in for a world of hurt. Punisher is ruthless, Batman is compassionate. That's the major difference between them.
Dracoa79 5 days ago
@waldoman7
For the charities and job building, that's all well and good, but does absolutely nothing to stop the crime element or remove the literal revolving door from Arkham.
Suspension of disbelief when it comes to Superman is a humanoid alien with heat vision, super strength, flight, ice breath, and whatever other powers he's been given, including lifting a mountain of the stuff that's supposed to kill him.
Dracoa79 1 month ago
@Dracoa79 /cough
Decent points my good man,points that TDK addressed and which made it a far better movie
All the Fantastic Four movie had was lame acting and Jessica Alba in tights.
kea919306 1 year ago
@kea919306
And yet they are making another Batman movie where you just know that he's going to be the hero, not just another criminal. Sure you could compare him to Robin Hood in that they are both criminals, but at least RH is charismatic, loved by the people, and fighting a far greater evil than Batman does. All Batman fights are petty criminals, disturbingly insane, but still petty criminals.
Fantastic Four also had Stan Lee.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 Whether you believe Batman is a better or a worse hero than any of the FF members doesnt concern me.I still prefer Batman.And the one thing i will say is that the FF movie sucked.It had the potential of being a good film but they failed.Direct yourself to Marvel/DC: After Hours #4 the part with luthor and doom speaking.Its a clear summation of what was wrong with the film
kea919306 1 year ago
@kea919306
I don't deny that the FF movies had their flaws,, they didand they were big ones too, in fact I'm not even a big FF fan, but Batman Begins and Dark Knight had the same flaw that the first Hulk movie had, and it was a doozy, they were too dark. There was only one Batman that stood out to me as being just the right balance of darkness and lightness, the one with Jack Nicholson as The Joker.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 Oh true.I love TDK but imo it wasnt a superhero film as much as it was a character study.But yeah the Tim Burton film would have been the best Batman film if there wasnt one single flaw.
Batman killed.
Batman never kills
Its an issue TDK addresed and imo makes it a better adaptation.
But "sigh" i would lie if i didnt say i didnt like the Tim Burton film just as much
kea919306 1 year ago
@kea919306
I see Batman not killing as one of his major flaws. He is incapable of doing what must be done. No, I don't think he should go out killing ever criminal he comes across (barring himself of course), but for the ones who keep getting out like Joker, the one's who will never learn. Eventually enough is enough. Even Marvel's Wolverine as Old Man Logan was able to do what had to be done and he decapitated Red Skull who was the President at the time. Batman couldn't have done that.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 Best way to describe the difference between Batman and Wolverine is this: They both stared into the abyss,but when the abyss looked back Logan blinked.
Logan aint exactly a role model hes a stone cold killer and he knows it but because of such he seeks redemption for his sins which what makes him a escellent character as well.Batman on the other hand knows that if he goes down that path theres no going back by becoming a murderer he becomes what he fights and he will never allow that
kea919306 1 year ago
@kea919306
So Batman is incapable of seeking redemption for his sins? That's not exactly role model material either. Besides, do you really think anyone in Gotham would blame Batman if he did kill off all those "super villains" who only showed up after he got started? It could be argued that if there were no Batman, there would be no Joker, there would be no Two Face, or any of the others. That means that Batman is indirectly responsible for what they do.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 Batman didn't LITERALLY create supervillains. That's only true in the sense that it happend because batman beating up regular people got boring after awhile, so a writer came up with a unique villain, then these unique villains starting coming up again because they were popular. In fiction someone like Ras would still be around. If anything you can blame the city of gothem for creating batman and everyone else. these people would still be around, just not caught for a long time.
GadGades 8 months ago
@Dracoa79 The point is each character has its own pros and cons some argue that because Batman or Superman wont kill or just appear invulnerable/incorruptable and such makes them less appealing.But isnt that the point of After Hour?These characters werent made to be relatable they are symbols the stuff of legends.Their own existence is meant to inspire people to try and do better in their life.Just because a character doesnt appeal to someones standard doesnt degrade the character
kea919306 1 year ago
@kea919306
Well, when it comes to Supes, I have to agree with Lex. Why aspire to anything with Superman around? He's already inhumanly better at everything, so humans rely on him, taking away their drive. Superman is really the villain of that story. And Bats? Well, he's got as many mental issues as his enemies do, in fact it could be said that each of his enemies reflects one or more of his issues, and that his battling them is him battling himself.
Dracoa79 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 You know what i was going to write another long post but the fact is im tired of this arguing.Point in matter if you dont like any of the DC comics characters why are you commenting about them?Let this crap rest.We both agree to disagree and leave it at that
kea919306 1 year ago
@Dracoa79 that's ridiculous, it's so ridiculous the movie doesn't even feel the need to combat it. None of that has to do moral behaviour. Superman aspires to do and be good, He didn't cash in, or try to take over. Jets are much faster than people and that doesn't stop people from trying to be fast on foot or bikes or cars ect. He inspires by being helpful compassionate. He's someone that helps old ladies crossed the street amplified.
GadGades 8 months ago
@kea919306 batman killed darkside, because he was destroying the universe, and he killed some ninja in knightfall,
busterandbusteret 6 months ago
@kea919306 Who doesn't like seeing Jessica Alba in tights?
Hotmanlion12 7 months ago
wow look its mcdonalds toys!!!
TheFantasyHacks 1 year ago
lol mcdonalds toy The Thing.....
3Te4rS 1 year ago
Thats just sad. The FF deserves waaaay better than that.
RisingVictor 1 year ago
@RisingVictor ...Are...are you serious? Did you SEE the movies?
chrisproxxx 1 year ago
@chrisproxxx I am talking about the franchise in general, not the lackluster films. They deserve better movies. Thats what Im saying.
RisingVictor 1 year ago
Once again Batman wins by a land slide
lfish87 1 year ago
sad thing is they still lost cause rise of the silver surfer was terrible :P
SpiritSword 1 year ago
this sucks its about the only stupid film you have made
Bubblegum632 1 year ago
hahahahahaha
chaddoman 1 year ago
dude........weak
ssdeadly1 1 year ago
haha
MarvelDCGoFigures 1 year ago
im batman
MrSecret997 1 year ago
Im Batman ...
valdemarerbarenedere 1 year ago
@valdemarerbarenedere
No, I'm Batman...and so's my wife :P
Deadxman616 1 year ago
So sad. #fail
zeth006 1 year ago
What about V?
ZomgRuler 1 year ago
@ZomgRuler yeah man wheres V. he is one of my favorite DC characters
n809n 1 year ago
@ZomgRuler To be fair V is part of the Vertigo imprint, not a classic "DC" release. Watchmen actually was under the DC imprint, so while it was a comic book movie, it doesn't fit the "Marvel vs DC" proper matchup.
SteveJRogers 1 year ago
I'm a Marvel, and I'm a Marvel, and I'm a Marvel, and I'm a Marvel.
I'm Batman.
TheGuyThatsAwesome 1 year ago
Marvel wins by default
theLleeon 1 year ago
batman is bettr than marvel all he had to say is "im batman" lol
SpyCheck99 1 year ago
@SpyCheck99 Batman is better than any superhero.
Zander10100 1 year ago
Haha batman owns all of them!!
AmigoProduktions 1 year ago
@ Paperbackwizard
Aquaman? Really? I'm not even going to have this discussion with you. And as for the Flash, I'll say this:
His only power is that he can move really, really fast right? I'm sorry, but what would happen if he tripped and fell? He'd most likely hit his head and die. When you can be killed because you tripped over a curb, you're lame. Bottom line.
TheBigNast187 1 year ago
Lame, BigNast. An Aquaman movie would have the potential for incredible visuals, epic battle sequences, and even an environmental angle. Basically, it's "Avatar" underwater. *grins*
As for the Flash, obviously the laws of physics work a little differently for him; otherwise, he wouldn't be able to see or breathe when he runs. In his case, it's his character that makes him an interesting subject for a movie hero.
Actually, the characters are what makes ANY movie interesting (or not).
PaperbackWizard 1 year ago 2
@PaperbackWizard you're right!
the people at DC are so stupid, they don't realise what potential their whole host of superheroes have. I mean, the DCAU is renowned for it's quality and mature writing, and that was just a series of cartoons. If they would use materials from that and make movies as good as the DCAU was for cartoons it would be great. I mean at Marvel we have spidey, fantastic 4, x-men, Hulk, so muuch. at DC it's just Batman... and supes but he doesnt compare with Nolan's batman.
bbphnix 1 year ago
@bbphnix
Green lantern wonder woman flash, look we have to stop fighting over whose better, we can call it spade to spade DC is (or at least I feel) a little more classier than marvel but marvel has far more mature story writing.
pillowpantsforlife2 1 year ago
@PaperbackWizard actually you know what!?!?!
just the way Bruce Tim and Paul Dini created the DCAU starting with batman, if DC has any brains they'll convince Nolan to make a DCMU: DC Movie Universe. He has the brains and the talent to do not just a good batman... but a good DC Universe in movie form. I mean only then would Marvel and DC be comparable terms of movies.
bbphnix 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMARROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO ATLEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS
TheAntony14 1 year ago
The end should have had the TF2 winning sound
BlockisticStudios 1 year ago
You know, Constantine was DC (technically), and it came out in '05. Maybe he'd have been a better match for the Fantastic Four.
PaperbackWizard 1 year ago
win by default boy that was one of ur best videos epic win XD
chuydelara 2 years ago
lmao "im batman" never gets old
soldierukn 2 years ago 2
And whatever happened to Aquaman? Or The Flash? They used to be right there in the top tier.
PaperbackWizard 2 years ago 2
They never should have tanked the Wonder Woman movie.
Seriously, though, I want to see The Question in his own movie; maybe the Huntress could make an appearance.
PaperbackWizard 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
did u get ur mom to voice invis woman there? xD jk jk
good vid
ChruthPower 2 years ago
lol, marvel owns
JPisHOT94 2 years ago
were there really no dc movies in 2007?
IlidianStormrage 2 years ago
can u think of any?
SmashLiXs 2 years ago
Nope. Superman came out 2006, Batman 2008 and Watchmen in 2009. 2007 DC put out nothing.
TheTigerwolf55 2 years ago 4
So 2010 is gonna repeat 2007 cause i never heard of any DC movie coming out in 2010. All it is so far is Iron Man 2.
JoshTheSniper 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Jonah Hex is coming out in 2010.
DeathsChampion 2 years ago
jonah hex and losers; not very big movies tho
Simonc319 2 years ago
I've heard that the Green Lantern movie is expected for 2011, so it looks like Jonah Hex and Losers will have to contend with Iron Man 2 and Kick-Ass. Not good odds.
PS3dudeJerry 2 years ago
No.....DC is going to release Johna Hex......He is a bounty hunter from the DC universe...
rod199515 2 years ago
DC has Jonah Hex this year, and The Losers are technically DC.
spideymouse 2 years ago
knew that already. man dc doesn't put out much. what dc movies were before 2005? (not counting superman & batman)
SmashLiXs 2 years ago
Dickhead
Gogoilong 2 years ago
ty for ur guy's help
MrBoomLazer 2 years ago
all batman had to do is say im batman to win the argument!!!
kenshixumada 2 years ago 197
Wheren't there actually two Marvel movies that year? Where's Ghost Rider?
kittyprydekissme 2 years ago
And Spiderman.
ManlySlut 2 years ago
Electra
ManlySlut 2 years ago
well this one was better, u gotta admit
IlidianStormrage 2 years ago
1 DC on 5 mavarles lol
videohitsdude01 2 years ago
whats dc stand for? i sure i know it i just can think of it right now.. please help?
MrBoomLazer 2 years ago
detective comics
Zirror 2 years ago 2
It's Detective Comics.
bonebonebone3 2 years ago
detective comics
mattffx10 2 years ago
why hasnt any of the Fantastic Four apeard in any of your main videos
WilliamParcell 2 years ago
Probablly because he dosen't like using BK toys. I mean, where are the FF toys!
theironbat46 2 years ago 2
hi im a marvel 4x im batman lol
mandrail09 2 years ago 2
Wth
pooppooppoop7890 2 years ago
oh ok i see lol
darklengend44 2 years ago
i dont get this one may someone explain?
darklengend44 2 years ago
its the competion in 2005 the first fantastic 4 went agenst batmman begins and batman begins was better but in 2007 there was no competion for marvel with fantastic 4 lol please excuse my spelling hope u can understand this keyboard isnt making sense except this sentence lol
platanoking7 2 years ago 62
WOO HOO PARTY ROFL
Bob2IzIcon 2 years ago
Marvel better watch out though, if DC does release Super Max into theatres I think it would dwarf other movies featuring wealth of superheroes like x-men. Why do I think that? Well it will have alot of DC villain cameos, even a few from batman, and we all love batman. Not to mention Green Arrow is in it. I can just imagine some kid being like "Mommy, I want to see the movie with Robin Hood breaking out of jail! PLEASE MOMMY!"
LOL. I'm just saying marvel better watch out.
Dudinator123 2 years ago
Now Marvel's planning to do a Fantastic Four reboot. I just hope that it doesn't prove to be a mistake.
Metaknight486 2 years ago
Me too, the FF could be fun. They just need to remember you need a good *villain*. Doctor Doom in the recent movies was a whiny idiot.
Ugroade 2 years ago
That's FOX, not Marvel. Marvel prbably just wishes FOX, Sony & LionsGate would give them their characters back like Universal did with the Hulk. Those 4 studios collectively have made 15 live action movies based on Marvel characters and only 4 of them don't suck(X1, X2, SM1, SM2).
SavageVandar 2 years ago