So what is your evidence for saying it is your version of god? why could it not be Zeus or any other? Also, you don't believe in the big bang? yet there is evidence for it.. perhaps you should look that up.
Knowntje , ok. As I said, it is hard to get what he is talking about in this. I mean I don't mind these type of debates, but he really needs to put more meat into this, or at least not hide it in the crap he goes o about.
you did make rather a lot of videos to his. Also, what is with the bs at the start of this video?
Also, you do reliaze that the big bang may not have been how the universe started. Also, why do we have to think there has to be a mind that lives outside of time and space? Why is it always that ppl base there argument on this subject? Also, the burden of proof is on the person who comes up with something not based on evidence. NOT the person who asked the question.
Depends on what you mean. I think there is some kind of "pluralist physicalism' where abstract objects can exist. If you are just a materialist you can't believe in abstract objects.
How can emergent properties exist without the properties that makes them emerge. How can you say a mind can exist without the electricity keeping it going. how can a mind be without time, if a mind was timeless, we should be able to just stop an live in our head for ever.
there are allot of thing that are greater than the sum of its parts, the mind is greater than the sum of its parts. It is called emergent property an we see it everywhere. how can you be waiting for time zero before time began?
some yet undiscovered law outside the universe, must be false because we live in the universeand have only seen what is in it. If that is the case then we should also conclude every other none universe related entity as non existing.
Numbers are abstract and mathematical. Not concrete and actual.
Apologist325 3 years ago
Good rebuttal.
lilchrizz123 3 years ago
So what is your evidence for saying it is your version of god? why could it not be Zeus or any other? Also, you don't believe in the big bang? yet there is evidence for it.. perhaps you should look that up.
Krensharpaw 3 years ago
he does accept the big bang, he actually used it in defense of the kalam argument, he's not a creationist
Knowntje 3 years ago
Knowntje , ok. As I said, it is hard to get what he is talking about in this. I mean I don't mind these type of debates, but he really needs to put more meat into this, or at least not hide it in the crap he goes o about.
Anyway, ty for pointing that out.
Krensharpaw 3 years ago
you did make rather a lot of videos to his. Also, what is with the bs at the start of this video?
Also, you do reliaze that the big bang may not have been how the universe started. Also, why do we have to think there has to be a mind that lives outside of time and space? Why is it always that ppl base there argument on this subject? Also, the burden of proof is on the person who comes up with something not based on evidence. NOT the person who asked the question.
Krensharpaw 3 years ago
"rethink my position on abortion "
I have to admit, that was very funny
Knowntje 3 years ago 4
You are the best apologist ever...seriously. Keep up the good work.
CooFrank 3 years ago
One can believe in Abstract objects and be an atheist. Bertrand Russel did.
facilisdescenus 3 years ago
well apparently Bertrand russel wasn't a physicalist.
migkillertwo 3 years ago
Depends on what you mean. I think there is some kind of "pluralist physicalism' where abstract objects can exist. If you are just a materialist you can't believe in abstract objects.
facilisdescenus 3 years ago
How can emergent properties exist without the properties that makes them emerge. How can you say a mind can exist without the electricity keeping it going. how can a mind be without time, if a mind was timeless, we should be able to just stop an live in our head for ever.
Ishta5 3 years ago
there are allot of thing that are greater than the sum of its parts, the mind is greater than the sum of its parts. It is called emergent property an we see it everywhere. how can you be waiting for time zero before time began?
Ishta5 3 years ago
some yet undiscovered law outside the universe, must be false because we live in the universeand have only seen what is in it. If that is the case then we should also conclude every other none universe related entity as non existing.
Ishta5 3 years ago
why would the cause be conscious, what kind of jump is that. There has to be a cause ergo it is conscious.
Ishta5 3 years ago
Great rebuttal.
AbdielAbiram 3 years ago