wow you deserve some major props on your foster pick pulvaris, he was at like +715, larson is overraated as hell wow, i wish i knew his sprawl was that good he stuffed all teh takedowns, props!
I like your assessment and attitude, and you finished it off well. One thing I'll say about Rosholt is he may have an advantage coming from x-treme couture in this scenario. Usually I think that camp is a disadvantage, but considering the momentum they have from Randy's win, and the commonalities of the two fighter's, Rosholt may be free to dominate.
well thank you very much. I try my best, im not afraid to say I aint the best at predictions, but im not that bad. I'm at a dissadvantage being English, and the scene is so far behind here. Also...I dont train myself. Although I dont say it in predictions videos since I must pick winners, for me, character and attitude of a fighter matters more. I dont mind supporting a loser IF he's actually the better man...if you follow. But for Predictions videos it is strictly business LOL
-rosholt wins by tko usually so that means he wants to stand? if your new thats cool but rosholt is a wrestler who wins with ground and pound and grove is the one with the reach and probably standup advantage, not that i disagree with rosholt pick
-saunders has like 6 inches of reach and giving up like 7 inches in height and its muay thai vs boxing, and saunders is better on the ground
Look at who Saunders has faced though. As for Rosholt, I think I said I didnt know much about him either. Reach advantage means nothing unless your good at striking in the first place. I kinda class gnp more as standup, though granted its a real wrestler type thing to do, for that you need to know more about the people, and you cant have detailed knowledge about everyone on the card, that I freely admit :)
right, being the better striker makes you the better striker, which grove is, like i said rosholt wins with ground and pound tko's not standing, you assessments are to much based on records instead of actually watching and analyzing fights, like i said if your new thats cool but i suggest you familiarize yourself with up and comers or even guys that are known already, like how you dont put anything into black belt? wtf maybe if the black belt is fighting another black belt of a better teacher
the thing about a black belt, is it largely depends on who that black belt was given out by. Also its a completely subjective measure. some unranked fighters are better then black belts because there isnt really a test, its not earned through skills exactly, its almost given at the masters will. One cant familiarize themselves with EVERYONE. if I see the match and if im impressed ill do further research, thats how I work.
thats what i said, a black belt fighting a black belt taught by a better teacher.... of corse it depends on who gave you the belt but larsons black belt beats fosters no belt and crap jiu jitsu defense
-fabricio camoes (cah-moe-sh) is a 2nd degree black belt under royler gracie and is under ed soares and trains at black house, bank on him
-foster over larson... are you insane!!! do you know hes at like +600? you really do need to stop looking at records and learn about some of these guys, larson is a division 1 wrestler with a black belt in jiu jitsu
I've met Brian Foster, I know what he's capable of. I dont put as much stock in black belts. as for Fabricio, I admitted in the video I didnt know anything about him
well it shows what brits know about wrestling then, division 1 wrestler = you get taken down unless your a better division 1 wrestler, did you even see foster vs story? he was toyed with and submitted with an arm triangle within the guard, larson is going to crush him, i guarentee it
Wrestling isnt taught in England in an academic sense period. its completely extracirricular. I did see Foster vs Story, I met Brian Foster less then a week after that match, look on my profile and you'll find the interview I did with him :)
u look like hogwart
keepitdownlo 2 years ago
i hope you bet real money on foster!
PriDeNevErDie789 2 years ago
you dont say. LMAO
pulvaris 2 years ago
wow you deserve some major props on your foster pick pulvaris, he was at like +715, larson is overraated as hell wow, i wish i knew his sprawl was that good he stuffed all teh takedowns, props!
PriDeNevErDie789 2 years ago
thanking you kindly :)
pulvaris 2 years ago
good picks...great accent.
keep up the good vids.
HIT SQUAD 4 the WIN !!!
KneebarBuffet 2 years ago
I like your assessment and attitude, and you finished it off well. One thing I'll say about Rosholt is he may have an advantage coming from x-treme couture in this scenario. Usually I think that camp is a disadvantage, but considering the momentum they have from Randy's win, and the commonalities of the two fighter's, Rosholt may be free to dominate.
willxisxveganx 2 years ago
well thank you very much. I try my best, im not afraid to say I aint the best at predictions, but im not that bad. I'm at a dissadvantage being English, and the scene is so far behind here. Also...I dont train myself. Although I dont say it in predictions videos since I must pick winners, for me, character and attitude of a fighter matters more. I dont mind supporting a loser IF he's actually the better man...if you follow. But for Predictions videos it is strictly business LOL
pulvaris 2 years ago
Nobody will believe you! Fat ass loser!
I did not watch your stupid prediction as i would not want to waste 10mins watching a stupid asshole sharing stupid shit.
joewangable 2 years ago
and yet you wasted your time leaving a comment.
pulvaris 2 years ago
know ur roll and shut ur mouth.
KneebarBuffet 2 years ago
-rosholt wins by tko usually so that means he wants to stand? if your new thats cool but rosholt is a wrestler who wins with ground and pound and grove is the one with the reach and probably standup advantage, not that i disagree with rosholt pick
-saunders has like 6 inches of reach and giving up like 7 inches in height and its muay thai vs boxing, and saunders is better on the ground
PriDeNevErDie789 2 years ago
Look at who Saunders has faced though. As for Rosholt, I think I said I didnt know much about him either. Reach advantage means nothing unless your good at striking in the first place. I kinda class gnp more as standup, though granted its a real wrestler type thing to do, for that you need to know more about the people, and you cant have detailed knowledge about everyone on the card, that I freely admit :)
pulvaris 2 years ago
right, being the better striker makes you the better striker, which grove is, like i said rosholt wins with ground and pound tko's not standing, you assessments are to much based on records instead of actually watching and analyzing fights, like i said if your new thats cool but i suggest you familiarize yourself with up and comers or even guys that are known already, like how you dont put anything into black belt? wtf maybe if the black belt is fighting another black belt of a better teacher
PriDeNevErDie789 2 years ago
the thing about a black belt, is it largely depends on who that black belt was given out by. Also its a completely subjective measure. some unranked fighters are better then black belts because there isnt really a test, its not earned through skills exactly, its almost given at the masters will. One cant familiarize themselves with EVERYONE. if I see the match and if im impressed ill do further research, thats how I work.
pulvaris 2 years ago
thats what i said, a black belt fighting a black belt taught by a better teacher.... of corse it depends on who gave you the belt but larsons black belt beats fosters no belt and crap jiu jitsu defense
PriDeNevErDie789 2 years ago
well, we'll soon see.
pulvaris 2 years ago
-fabricio camoes (cah-moe-sh) is a 2nd degree black belt under royler gracie and is under ed soares and trains at black house, bank on him
-foster over larson... are you insane!!! do you know hes at like +600? you really do need to stop looking at records and learn about some of these guys, larson is a division 1 wrestler with a black belt in jiu jitsu
PriDeNevErDie789 2 years ago
I've met Brian Foster, I know what he's capable of. I dont put as much stock in black belts. as for Fabricio, I admitted in the video I didnt know anything about him
pulvaris 2 years ago
well it shows what brits know about wrestling then, division 1 wrestler = you get taken down unless your a better division 1 wrestler, did you even see foster vs story? he was toyed with and submitted with an arm triangle within the guard, larson is going to crush him, i guarentee it
PriDeNevErDie789 2 years ago
Wrestling isnt taught in England in an academic sense period. its completely extracirricular. I did see Foster vs Story, I met Brian Foster less then a week after that match, look on my profile and you'll find the interview I did with him :)
pulvaris 2 years ago