You have created your own religion. You have put humans on the throne of God and have worshipped the creature instead of the creator. You cut yourself off from the source of all things and only believe what you can conceive with your limited human mind. Your god is science and your own reasoning so you do have a religion which is called secular humanism.
@horseman528 Why is it that some religious folk are so set on making the thoughts and beliefs of disbelievers into religions as well? Is it an attempt to say "what we believe is crazy but what they believe crazier" to win votes or something? Because it really makes no sense to an outside observer. What difference does it make if Science is a religion? It's not like by saying that you make it false. Because if this was so any religion would automatically be false based on the same logic.
@ChoasTheory2000 I find anonymous messages suspicious. Who is this person? Where do they come from? Why are they saying what they say? I'm much more convinced when I can identify the context from which the message originated.
@ChoasTheory2000 you could assign it a meaning based on your own interpretation I suppose. Without an author to cross-examine I think there's a good chance of getting it wrong. I think the purpose of any message should include getting questions and feedback, some kind of dialectic. This message in particular seems a shot in the dark, a good idea maybe, but without the author I have no way of following up.
@CommitToFocus The motives of the author are important to understand intent, but not necessarily meaning. For example; we know little of Plato, but we can still understand the meaning of his messages without too much interpretation. I see what your saying though. Maybe I didn't understand your original meaning because I didn't understand your intent. ; )
so first you use faulty logic to say that because one scientific theory is true another must me true also. then you use an ingroup bias. also science and religion are not antithetical concepts infact sometiimes the one conpliments the other. how does religon avoid logic and critical thinking? religion never said that diversity can not be attained, it says that one species can not alter it's self to another species. btw if you didn't know some of our best scientists were christians.
@hulaboy94 How does religion avoid logic and critical thinking? A virgin birth is not logical. Jesus, Noah, Buddha, Mitras, Horus etc. were all born of virgin births. We have evidence (real evidence in the case of non avaian dinosaurs) from fossils that show the synapomorphys (unique characteristics within a species) that exhibit the structure of the "arm" bones in non-avian dinos to wings, as well as the evolution of feathers into modern day birds. BTW some of the best scientist are atheists.
i never denied that some of the best scientists are atheists. I accept it. However your statement did not conflict with mine. infact it merely stated what my statement illuded to. The reason why i said that some of the best scientists are chistians, is because that would negate the maker of this video's claim that " instead of aspiring to become one of them [scientists], you chose to stand their with your ignorance."
@cmsalvagio to think that a vigin birth happened naturally is illogical, however, it's never claimed that it happened naturally. What religion says that Noah, Buddha,Mitras, adn Horus were born of virgins? I only claim that Jesus (God incarnate) was. so your telling me that from the fossil record they are able to find not just one "relative" of a non-flying dinosaur, that flies, but they are also able to find a progression of dinosaur fossil's leading up to modern birds?
@hulaboy94 then it is in the realm of superstition and superstitions are illogical. What I was trying to point out is that the Jesus theme had born worn out centuries before Jesus was a twinkle in some ghost's eye. You are absolutely able to find a distinct progression from non-avian dinosaurs to avian dinosaurs, of which are living today. Birds have a common ancestor to alvialae to Deinonychosauria to paraves to maniraptora to coelurosauria to tetanurae to therapodato saurisvhia to dinosauria.
@cmsalvagio well call you what it will, but i still don't see how it would be detrimental to one's critical thinking. so then are you saying that subtle mutations caused diversity or adaption?
@hulaboy94 I am saying subtle mutations over "deep time", millions of years. Like in the case of the Paraves have a synapomorphy of a shoulder with an L-shaped coracoid (helps in wings flapping) and then later in Avialae an alula is formed, which is basically the thumb, but very important as far as steering in flight is concerned. However, the formation of flight feathers (more advanced asymmetrical feathers) is a huge synapomorphy that allowed birds (avialae). Small changes look big over time.
@cmsalvagio well mutations, if i am not mistaken, does not lead to new information, but a loss. also if their was a need for the animal to mutate and succeed in surviving by being hte fitest. then wouldn't normal birds be extinct? along with all the other animals which supposedly mutated into another animal. not to mention very few mutations are passed on to offspring.
@hulaboy94 ALL mutations that are selected for add information to the genome. Nylon eating bacteria. (new information) nylon is a human invention. There is bacteria that eat it. To name one. Please learn evolution and not from creationist sites. You will be far better in life than sticking to some barbarians view of science. Your question is very sophomoric. This is something you should learn for yourself. Google or youtube this, read scientific journals there are plenty out there.
@cmsalvagio i do research it frequently, and i do learn it for myself. and as for my questions being sophomoric, which ones? i never claimed to know everything, in fact i said "if i'm not mistaken". admitting my lack of confidence in my info. but it still doesn't add up how the animal has to adapt to live, but then the ones who don't adapt live on and the ones who do die off.
@hulaboy94 This question particularly. "also if their was a need for the animal to mutate and succeed in surviving by being hte fitest. then wouldn't normal birds be extinct?" This question may suggest that you do not understand what Darwin meant by the "most fit surviving."< Spencer coined the phrase, not Darwin. If you were to understand the most basic concepts of evolution along with Huttonian "deep time" you would understand your question's simplicity. Read Darwin's "Origin..."
@hulaboy94 dont trust me though go to Columbia university's website. ((((rainbow.ldeo{DOT}columbia.edu/courses/v1001/masterclads{DOT}html))))
the link shows the master cladograms and if you do not trust them go to any of the Science Journals and do a search. These are peer reviewed articles. These cladograms show common descent.
@HerrRauru11235813 So why don't my eyes, ears, nose,....basically any organ function as well as some other animals? Remember: All-powerful means that you can create ANYTHING that can do ANYTHING with perfection. Heck, according to christian mythology, even his very first design, "Adam", suffered from a critical bug of "fruit eating".
When I finally told my parents that I don't believe in gods and that to me, religion is a pointless concept that turned us into puppets, they asked: 'So what created the world? And how did the universe get created, huh?'
i'm an atheist, but it's kind of funny that you put a picture of bruxy's book "the end of religion", while that book is about ending religious practices and being all the more dedicated to your personal relationship with the God of the Bible lulz
the voice effect is annoying!but the message is correct! it's time to bury religion and all it's nonsense!(invisible gods,hell fire in a spiritual world,living forever in heaven after you die!)just nonsense.
This is such nonsense. First of all this idea of comparing evolution to gravity is ridiculous. Was this video made by a 14 year old? Or have you not figured out the difference between tangible and intangible objects. Secondly, you're forgetting it was those religions you hate that brought you the language, philosophy and science in the first place. You destroyed them with opinion.
This reminds me of the people who attack our capitalist system while still financially benefiting from it. Asinine.
He did say that he acknowledged religious institutions like medieval monasteries as the precursors to modern universities. It would indeed be foolish not to do so.
Christianity has no future... literally. They aspire to see the world incinerated and 3/4 of the human race suffer horrific and painful deaths. This is no future. Even the most dystopic atheist vision of the future is orders of magnitude more affermative than the Abrahamic faiths simply because there is a future.
Pity you only have ONE video uploaded however, your video was a breath of fresh air to me therefore I subscribed hoping you'd come out with more videos like this.
I pity the "FOOLS" whom even after watching your video still are BRAINWASHED by their religious dogmas that they can't comprehend your video!
Jesus was a real person who died on the cross and the Tomb he was buried in was empty! Explain that. Explain how he walked on water. Explain how he is CONVICTING YOU RIGHT NOW while you are reading this.
@truth4once1 Let me put your logic into context for you. Obi Wan was a real Jedi who died by Vaders light sabre but his robe was empty! Explain that. Explain how he floats with a blue aura. Explain how he is CONVICTING YOU RIGHT NOW while you are reading this.... Do yo understand? Yes? Good, now use the brain you claim god made. No? Then remain willfully ignorant.
1.) We don't have evidence to suggest he was a real person.
2.) If he was, how was the tomb empty? His cult removed his body?
And if you say that isn't possible, then answer me how two women who were going to to the tomb to prepare his body for burial were supposed to move this gigantic rock?
3.) Explain how Superman flies.
4.) He's not convicting me right now. Any more than Superman is.
"- Yes, refusing to believe in burning bushes, being fashioned out of dust or created from a rib, walking on water, and magically unproven deities is narrow-mindedness. But yet believe that a whole Earth and solar system can just come out of a big bang and nothing initiated that big bang. SERIOUSLY? So do me a favor and explain how Jesus was born from a virgin (FACT that even Muslims agree with).
So according to this guy and people who think like him, if the creation of Earth and People all happened from a big bang and will die eventually and the Earth has a meteor strike or something. Whats next? You just are gone? DIssapeared? There is really no reason to live if all of this just goes away.... WRONG!!!!!!!!!!! Your soul (the part that these scientists cannot touch LIVES FOREVER! Jesus Christ proved this when he rose from the dead on the third day after being nailed to a cross.
@truth4once1 That is the difference between you and atheists. You Christians are only willing to live if you think there is a reward at the end. Atheists are willing to live in order to enjoy life as it is. So while you may think it's pointless to live without a god or heaven, there are others with different opinions. And btw, your form dies, but your matter does not, you are composed of universal dust that is 15.7 billion years old. Use the brain you claim your god gave you, if you are able.
This person says there is so much proof of evolution. What proof? Plenty of Micro Biologists have disproven this claim of evolution. I do agree that each species evolves within thier own species such as get bigger, smaller, smarter, etc in order to survive thier enviroemnt. There is no proof of crossover species. Evolution just like theology is all THEORY.
God has every thing to do with science. He created people to be scientific, free thinkers. Man will never be God, and science is nothing with out God. Scienists are very smart but to deny that a God created all of this then you are an idiot.
I recognise Kent Kovind, but who's the guy at 4:53, and the other guy at 4:57?
And by the way, I never thought that someone could orchestrate a computer-reader so artfully! Fantastic video, I copied down several of those quotes for future reference.
@fundreamer1 - Yes, refusing to believe in burning bushes, being fashioned out of dust or created from a rib, walking on water, and magically unproven deities is narrow-mindedness. Christians totally have us illogical atheists beat on that one!
@fundreamer1 - *Sarcasm detector bleeps*. See, my top of the range sarcasm detector - the latest model - by far supersedes your crappy model. Upgrade now pl0x.
@fundreamer1 - Hehe, as long as we are both equally convinced that the other is wrong and we're right, we will forever remain participants of the infamous theism v. atheism debate ;).
Very true, thanks. What to say.. 'Stupidity has no ending'.
utubekula 1 month ago
"I would like to introduce myself. It is not important who I am" hahaha, that tells me what I need to know here.
jimbojones888 1 month ago
Well said/done ★★★★★
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 3 months ago
I say we wage war on religion, it's the only way they understand and it sure would be peaceful in the world without these crazies.
MrROTD 3 months ago
well done.
Have you seen the "Christian dark ages" demotivator?
Singebuggercat 3 months ago
OUTSTANDING!!!! THANK YOU!!!
NEGATIONofP 3 months ago
I find it ironic that the maker of the video used a computer generated voice, but asks the listeners to "lend your voices" to his cause.
Not that I disagree with the message of the video, and I fully understand the insane harm that religion is capable of, just sayin'.
JE12109 6 months ago
You have created your own religion. You have put humans on the throne of God and have worshipped the creature instead of the creator. You cut yourself off from the source of all things and only believe what you can conceive with your limited human mind. Your god is science and your own reasoning so you do have a religion which is called secular humanism.
horseman528 6 months ago
@horseman528 Why is it that some religious folk are so set on making the thoughts and beliefs of disbelievers into religions as well? Is it an attempt to say "what we believe is crazy but what they believe crazier" to win votes or something? Because it really makes no sense to an outside observer. What difference does it make if Science is a religion? It's not like by saying that you make it false. Because if this was so any religion would automatically be false based on the same logic.
xynth101088 5 months ago
@horseman528 no we haven't , how can we worship the absence of something? face the truth, there's no God and no evidence of God whatsoever.
MrROTD 3 months ago
Sorry, to me a message without a messenger is meaningless.
CommitToFocus 7 months ago
@CommitToFocus Why is that?
ChoasTheory2000 7 months ago
@ChoasTheory2000 I find anonymous messages suspicious. Who is this person? Where do they come from? Why are they saying what they say? I'm much more convinced when I can identify the context from which the message originated.
CommitToFocus 7 months ago
@CommitToFocus Fair enough, but does the person always give the message meaning? Or can a message have meaning without an author?
ChoasTheory2000 7 months ago
@ChoasTheory2000 you could assign it a meaning based on your own interpretation I suppose. Without an author to cross-examine I think there's a good chance of getting it wrong. I think the purpose of any message should include getting questions and feedback, some kind of dialectic. This message in particular seems a shot in the dark, a good idea maybe, but without the author I have no way of following up.
CommitToFocus 7 months ago
@CommitToFocus The motives of the author are important to understand intent, but not necessarily meaning. For example; we know little of Plato, but we can still understand the meaning of his messages without too much interpretation. I see what your saying though. Maybe I didn't understand your original meaning because I didn't understand your intent. ; )
ChoasTheory2000 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 7 months ago
so first you use faulty logic to say that because one scientific theory is true another must me true also. then you use an ingroup bias. also science and religion are not antithetical concepts infact sometiimes the one conpliments the other. how does religon avoid logic and critical thinking? religion never said that diversity can not be attained, it says that one species can not alter it's self to another species. btw if you didn't know some of our best scientists were christians.
hulaboy94 7 months ago
@hulaboy94 How does religion avoid logic and critical thinking? A virgin birth is not logical. Jesus, Noah, Buddha, Mitras, Horus etc. were all born of virgin births. We have evidence (real evidence in the case of non avaian dinosaurs) from fossils that show the synapomorphys (unique characteristics within a species) that exhibit the structure of the "arm" bones in non-avian dinos to wings, as well as the evolution of feathers into modern day birds. BTW some of the best scientist are atheists.
cmsalvagio 7 months ago
i never denied that some of the best scientists are atheists. I accept it. However your statement did not conflict with mine. infact it merely stated what my statement illuded to. The reason why i said that some of the best scientists are chistians, is because that would negate the maker of this video's claim that " instead of aspiring to become one of them [scientists], you chose to stand their with your ignorance."
hulaboy94 7 months ago
@cmsalvagio to think that a vigin birth happened naturally is illogical, however, it's never claimed that it happened naturally. What religion says that Noah, Buddha,Mitras, adn Horus were born of virgins? I only claim that Jesus (God incarnate) was. so your telling me that from the fossil record they are able to find not just one "relative" of a non-flying dinosaur, that flies, but they are also able to find a progression of dinosaur fossil's leading up to modern birds?
hulaboy94 7 months ago
@hulaboy94 then it is in the realm of superstition and superstitions are illogical. What I was trying to point out is that the Jesus theme had born worn out centuries before Jesus was a twinkle in some ghost's eye. You are absolutely able to find a distinct progression from non-avian dinosaurs to avian dinosaurs, of which are living today. Birds have a common ancestor to alvialae to Deinonychosauria to paraves to maniraptora to coelurosauria to tetanurae to therapodato saurisvhia to dinosauria.
cmsalvagio 7 months ago
@cmsalvagio well call you what it will, but i still don't see how it would be detrimental to one's critical thinking. so then are you saying that subtle mutations caused diversity or adaption?
hulaboy94 7 months ago
@hulaboy94 I am saying subtle mutations over "deep time", millions of years. Like in the case of the Paraves have a synapomorphy of a shoulder with an L-shaped coracoid (helps in wings flapping) and then later in Avialae an alula is formed, which is basically the thumb, but very important as far as steering in flight is concerned. However, the formation of flight feathers (more advanced asymmetrical feathers) is a huge synapomorphy that allowed birds (avialae). Small changes look big over time.
cmsalvagio 7 months ago
@cmsalvagio well mutations, if i am not mistaken, does not lead to new information, but a loss. also if their was a need for the animal to mutate and succeed in surviving by being hte fitest. then wouldn't normal birds be extinct? along with all the other animals which supposedly mutated into another animal. not to mention very few mutations are passed on to offspring.
hulaboy94 6 months ago
@hulaboy94 ALL mutations that are selected for add information to the genome. Nylon eating bacteria. (new information) nylon is a human invention. There is bacteria that eat it. To name one. Please learn evolution and not from creationist sites. You will be far better in life than sticking to some barbarians view of science. Your question is very sophomoric. This is something you should learn for yourself. Google or youtube this, read scientific journals there are plenty out there.
cmsalvagio 6 months ago
@cmsalvagio i do research it frequently, and i do learn it for myself. and as for my questions being sophomoric, which ones? i never claimed to know everything, in fact i said "if i'm not mistaken". admitting my lack of confidence in my info. but it still doesn't add up how the animal has to adapt to live, but then the ones who don't adapt live on and the ones who do die off.
hulaboy94 6 months ago
@hulaboy94 This question particularly. "also if their was a need for the animal to mutate and succeed in surviving by being hte fitest. then wouldn't normal birds be extinct?" This question may suggest that you do not understand what Darwin meant by the "most fit surviving."< Spencer coined the phrase, not Darwin. If you were to understand the most basic concepts of evolution along with Huttonian "deep time" you would understand your question's simplicity. Read Darwin's "Origin..."
cmsalvagio 6 months ago
@hulaboy94 dont trust me though go to Columbia university's website. ((((rainbow.ldeo{DOT}columbia.edu/courses/v1001/masterclads{DOT}html))))
the link shows the master cladograms and if you do not trust them go to any of the Science Journals and do a search. These are peer reviewed articles. These cladograms show common descent.
cmsalvagio 7 months ago
I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite video on the Internet.
WCdragoninja 7 months ago
@HerrRauru11235813 So why don't my eyes, ears, nose,....basically any organ function as well as some other animals? Remember: All-powerful means that you can create ANYTHING that can do ANYTHING with perfection. Heck, according to christian mythology, even his very first design, "Adam", suffered from a critical bug of "fruit eating".
obijan42 7 months ago
Us/them bullshit.
t3tsuyaguy1 9 months ago
When I finally told my parents that I don't believe in gods and that to me, religion is a pointless concept that turned us into puppets, they asked: 'So what created the world? And how did the universe get created, huh?'
xilentpwn 9 months ago
"Do not make Intelligence your God"
virgorising1 10 months ago
This message is the dumbest shit ever. It sucks being lectured to by morons.
tracygonecrazy1 10 months ago
What proves Atheists are smart is the belief that chemicals once came to life, and that all life is a consequence.
onefodderunit 11 months ago
i'm an atheist, but it's kind of funny that you put a picture of bruxy's book "the end of religion", while that book is about ending religious practices and being all the more dedicated to your personal relationship with the God of the Bible lulz
emailjwr 1 year ago
not like
paulurban2 1 year ago
the voice effect is annoying!but the message is correct! it's time to bury religion and all it's nonsense!(invisible gods,hell fire in a spiritual world,living forever in heaven after you die!)just nonsense.
saladooq 1 year ago
I don't agree with every word but I like your general message a lot.
Still, there are two shitty points:
1. That robotic voice sucks eggs. Big time.
2. Speaking one text and offering others to read on screen sucks even more.
Am I supposed to listen AND read, follow both sources simultaneously?
That's a little hard.
42317 1 year ago
I'd like to add zombies being worshipped by people that think zombies are he work of the enemy entity.
MegaRicky04 1 year ago
This is such nonsense. First of all this idea of comparing evolution to gravity is ridiculous. Was this video made by a 14 year old? Or have you not figured out the difference between tangible and intangible objects. Secondly, you're forgetting it was those religions you hate that brought you the language, philosophy and science in the first place. You destroyed them with opinion.
This reminds me of the people who attack our capitalist system while still financially benefiting from it. Asinine.
knowwaie 1 year ago
@knowwaie
He did say that he acknowledged religious institutions like medieval monasteries as the precursors to modern universities. It would indeed be foolish not to do so.
42317 1 year ago
@knowwaie
"the difference between tangible and intangible objects"
Gravity is tangible?
"those religions you hate that brought you the language, philosophy and science in the first place."
We would have gotten those without religion as well. Actually, without religion holding us back we might even have colonized the solar system by now.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 year ago
Christianity has no future... literally. They aspire to see the world incinerated and 3/4 of the human race suffer horrific and painful deaths. This is no future. Even the most dystopic atheist vision of the future is orders of magnitude more affermative than the Abrahamic faiths simply because there is a future.
deepashtray 1 year ago 2
WoW! Very profound. Count me as subscribed!
74hodag 1 year ago
Pity you only have ONE video uploaded however, your video was a breath of fresh air to me therefore I subscribed hoping you'd come out with more videos like this.
I pity the "FOOLS" whom even after watching your video still are BRAINWASHED by their religious dogmas that they can't comprehend your video!
Multimixvideos 1 year ago
Jesus was a real person who died on the cross and the Tomb he was buried in was empty! Explain that. Explain how he walked on water. Explain how he is CONVICTING YOU RIGHT NOW while you are reading this.
truth4once1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@truth4once1 you pulled it out of your ass as you typed it "Problem solved"
LainOfTheRealWorld 1 year ago
@truth4once1 Let me put your logic into context for you. Obi Wan was a real Jedi who died by Vaders light sabre but his robe was empty! Explain that. Explain how he floats with a blue aura. Explain how he is CONVICTING YOU RIGHT NOW while you are reading this.... Do yo understand? Yes? Good, now use the brain you claim god made. No? Then remain willfully ignorant.
whanethewhip 1 year ago
@truth4once1
1.) We don't have evidence to suggest he was a real person.
2.) If he was, how was the tomb empty? His cult removed his body?
And if you say that isn't possible, then answer me how two women who were going to to the tomb to prepare his body for burial were supposed to move this gigantic rock?
3.) Explain how Superman flies.
4.) He's not convicting me right now. Any more than Superman is.
Wolverazio 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SOme of you so ignorantly use the argument.... .
"- Yes, refusing to believe in burning bushes, being fashioned out of dust or created from a rib, walking on water, and magically unproven deities is narrow-mindedness. But yet believe that a whole Earth and solar system can just come out of a big bang and nothing initiated that big bang. SERIOUSLY? So do me a favor and explain how Jesus was born from a virgin (FACT that even Muslims agree with).
truth4once1 1 year ago
Lord forgive him for he knows not what he says.
truth4once1 1 year ago
@truth4once1 Please, don't be so arrogant.
Wolverazio 1 year ago
Lord forgive him for he knows not waht he says.
truth4once1 1 year ago
This guy talking probably works for SATAN!!!!
truth4once1 1 year ago
So according to this guy and people who think like him, if the creation of Earth and People all happened from a big bang and will die eventually and the Earth has a meteor strike or something. Whats next? You just are gone? DIssapeared? There is really no reason to live if all of this just goes away.... WRONG!!!!!!!!!!! Your soul (the part that these scientists cannot touch LIVES FOREVER! Jesus Christ proved this when he rose from the dead on the third day after being nailed to a cross.
truth4once1 1 year ago
@truth4once1 That is the difference between you and atheists. You Christians are only willing to live if you think there is a reward at the end. Atheists are willing to live in order to enjoy life as it is. So while you may think it's pointless to live without a god or heaven, there are others with different opinions. And btw, your form dies, but your matter does not, you are composed of universal dust that is 15.7 billion years old. Use the brain you claim your god gave you, if you are able.
whanethewhip 1 year ago
This person says there is so much proof of evolution. What proof? Plenty of Micro Biologists have disproven this claim of evolution. I do agree that each species evolves within thier own species such as get bigger, smaller, smarter, etc in order to survive thier enviroemnt. There is no proof of crossover species. Evolution just like theology is all THEORY.
truth4once1 1 year ago
God has every thing to do with science. He created people to be scientific, free thinkers. Man will never be God, and science is nothing with out God. Scienists are very smart but to deny that a God created all of this then you are an idiot.
truth4once1 1 year ago
I recognise Kent Kovind, but who's the guy at 4:53, and the other guy at 4:57?
And by the way, I never thought that someone could orchestrate a computer-reader so artfully! Fantastic video, I copied down several of those quotes for future reference.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
LOL!!! Talk about being narrow minded! LOL!!! Atheists are the joke of all truly thinking men.
fundreamer1 1 year ago
@fundreamer1 - Yes, refusing to believe in burning bushes, being fashioned out of dust or created from a rib, walking on water, and magically unproven deities is narrow-mindedness. Christians totally have us illogical atheists beat on that one!
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@FibonaziProductions Like it's hard for an atheist to be beat.
fundreamer1 1 year ago
@fundreamer1 - Your sarcasm detector appears to be faulty. Please repair your systems and then try again.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@FibonaziProductions LOL! good one
fundreamer1 1 year ago
@fundreamer1 - *Sarcasm detector bleeps*. See, my top of the range sarcasm detector - the latest model - by far supersedes your crappy model. Upgrade now pl0x.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@FibonaziProductions If your happy with yourself then good for you.
fundreamer1 1 year ago
@fundreamer1 - Hell, maybe we could be friends. Just because we disagree, doesn't mean we have to be in constant opposition ;)
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@FibonaziProductions Anything is possible, it wouldn't be the first time I was friends with someone despite them being wrong. lol
fundreamer1 1 year ago
@fundreamer1 - Hehe, as long as we are both equally convinced that the other is wrong and we're right, we will forever remain participants of the infamous theism v. atheism debate ;).
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@FibonaziProductions Well.....Not forever.
fundreamer1 1 year ago
Nicely done, but it's like beating a dead horse.
Baromunk 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You's a troll bitch.
nosliwhtes09 2 years ago
yeah, and calling yourself a man, thats just labelling.
anybody who calls himself a man fails by default.
l2think
yunikage 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You can't call yourself "intelligent" while at the same time feeling the need to label yourself anything other than a human being.
Atheists fail by default.
xaninha123 2 years ago
i call myself male. im also a human being. does that make me unintelligent?
Klovyz 2 years ago 7
Worst argument ever!
ryanp123456 2 years ago 2
Intelligence, FUCK YEAH!
DarkKnyght2001 2 years ago 16
Fuck YEARH Athiests.
Oh, and first post.
elvingerbil 2 years ago 4