Added: 2 years ago
From: JosephPorta09
Views: 11,307
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (267)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • FUCK TRIANON!!! VESSTEN TRIANON!!! UJRA KELL TÁRGYOLNI A TRIANONI EGYEZMÉNYT...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!

  • Hát igen most meg itt tartunk kis csonka Magyarország ...........

  • the fact is and hungarians know it very well , the borders that they are dreaming will never be the same....so chill!!! So better let this thing sink in your brain and soul. One thing is for sure , none of your neighbors like u :Starting with Serbia and ending with Slovakia none of the likes u !!! And the rest of them :austria and cehia really don't wanna have any thing to do with u!!! start thinking why???

  • Report this Shit.

  • @Hungaroctonul

    ...5.) What we have to do with the gulag prisoners, dont be a fool.

    6.) There was something like this yes, to those guilty ones, those where seklers youngsters around their twenties. Punished, oh yes, where was the rumanian court anyway, any data about this?

  • @Hungaroctonul

    ...wrote down every single criminal and offender onto lists like this. I think that half million who leaved(if there was any) must be the aftermath of the massive rumanization process betwen the two world wars, it was something natural that the poor incomers settled down in much better situated regions of Transylvania. They were chased? Maybe by their remorse, dont be ridiculous!

    4.) Dont start with the holomyth:) They were sent yes, now they are in Izrael and Usa

  • @Hungaroctonul

    1.I dont understand what the first point is, more details please. Korea?

    2.You think on those rebelled and armed rumans who massacred and looted down -provoked by romanian kingdom and habsburg dinasty- the unprotected villages of hungarians and nobles during the revolution. They were defeated in open battles or hunted down later by the habsburg court.

    3.It is hard to judge the situatuin during a full scale war, while we know the rumanian mentality, when they...

  • I think the specie of the nationalist hungarian, is obsessed with this map of so called Greater Hungary, which actually never existed as a self sustaining state on the map of Europe. The state was Austria-Hungary, with Austria being nr.1 !

    Those territories were gived by the austrians to the hungarian goverment to administrate and that´s it. Trying to create those administrative lines as a real state on the map of Europe now, it´s pure madness and ignorance.

  • @SangeAlbastru1558

    It was the map from:

    Hungarian tribal confederation from 896-1001

    Map of independent Hungarian kingdom from 1001-1525

    Later in two parts: Hungarian kingdom(the habsburgs), Hungarian eastern kingdom (szapolyai)->Principality of Transylvania. (1525-1711)

    Hungarian kingdom (1711-1848,1849-1867)

    State of Hungary (1848-49)

    Hungarian kingdom (1867-1920)->the 2.split (1921-1944)

    State of Hungary (1945-2012)

  • @SangeAlbastru1558

    What you think doesnt matters, because it is only your own fiction.

    This is the list of the successors, on timeline, it is simple not?

  • citat z velkoplosnej genetickej studie L.L.C.sforza-profesora Stanforskej univerzity:"Madarsko v Europe je anomaliou.Jazyk je azijsky ,ale obyvatelstvoeuropske,väčšinou slovanske Atíto Slovania su povodnymobyvatelstvom Karpatskej kotliny.Absolutna väcsina obyvatelov MR nie je etnicky madarska,je prevazne slovanska akontinualne europska.Zostalo ibamadarske meno a aglutinujuci jazyk.Madarskych genov niet." Ludovo povedane -kazdy druhy Madar je slovak,len o tom este nevie...:)

  • @Robbin846

    Takéto "profesori" majú aj názor o tom, ze skiti sú pravdebodobne slovania, len o tom nevedeli.:)

  • @Veszett01 To co si napisal nieje ziadny argument len tvoja fantazia, tito profesori sa cely zivot zaoberaju etnologickym vyskumom a velmi dobre vedia co hovoria, ak by to nebola pravda tak takyto renomovany profesor by si nikdy nemohol dovolit nieco take vyslovit. A okrem toho staci len sa pozriet do Budapestianskeho telefonneho zoznamu kolko je tam Potoczky,Hradeczky,Parniczky,P­omikál,Turoczky,Veszelovszky,S­tefanovics,Jeszenszky,Galovics atd atd..madari su silne premiesani slovanmi

  • @Robbin846

    Tieto fantazmagorie sú len teórie od tych ktoré nevidia cisty obraz dejstva. Nikdy by nemohol vyslovit, to myslis vázne? Históriu pisajú vitazi, pocul si uz to? Vzdy to tak bolo, a vzdy to tak bude!

    Kto ti povedal ze niesme zmiesany, kde som to pisal? Celá kárpátská kotlina je tazko zmiesany geneticky, ale to je aj tak dobre, keby to takto nebolo, znamenalo by to ze etnicke cistenie sa dialo od rána do vecera.

  • @Veszett01 Teraz si napisal uplnu pravdu ze historiu pisu vitazi..a vy madari ste prehrali 2 svetove vojny po sebe a navyse teraz ste v takych katastrofalnych ekonomickych srackach ze ste po Grecku druha hospodarsky najhorsie stojaca krajina v celej EU..u vas vypukne obcianska vojna.A ti profesori pisu uplnu pravdu ver tomu oni niesu ani madari ani slovaci ale su uplne inej cudzej narodnosti a oni nemaju ziadny dovod nato aby pisali hluposti...

  • @Robbin846

    Ver tomu ze majú, mozná ze nechcú, ale to sa musi robit, lebo ak más iny názor dostanes meno antikristus. Kriza znamená ze nemozes zyt na takom urovni comu tvoja kultúra by asistovala, ak pozeras na slovensko tady budes najst omnoho horsie zivotné prostredia, neviem bol si uz v kysuce alebo orave, alebo celé vychodné slovensko vyzerá ako haiti. Toto nie je otázka národni. Problém je systém.

  • @Veszett01 Neviem aky iny nazor by mohol mat profesor na univerzite v Anglicku? Kto by ho tam nutil nato aby mal nejaky iny nazor??? Ved to je nezmysel co pises, on nema nic spolocne ani s madarmi ani so slovakmi,on je vedec a ucitel precoby mal pisat nepravdy? Ja chodim na vychodne slovensko, vyzera velmi dobre, na vychode zije najviac milionarov a ze su tam tie ciganske osady? No a? Ved v madarsku zije 2x tolko ciganov ako u nas a koho to trapi?

  • @Robbin846

    Bolo tam robené dodnes asi pat genetickych vyzkumov z toho dve z madarska, tri medzinárodné, rozsirenie jednotlivych genov v nich je od 20 do 65percentov, ako robis z toho konklúziu ze dneska tam nie sú geneticky staromadarské elementi? Nechaj to, to je len picovina, kim nemaju lepsie teórie, pisaju tam to co je im najlahsi.

    Akoby socializmus este sa neskoncila, zem je 15-20 krát lacnejsi nez na západe, nemyslel si vazne co si pisal...

  • @Veszett01 Tak to co som pisal som myslel uplne vazne, ja nikdy nepisem nieco co nemyslim vazne...a pokial ty sa citis byt mudrejsi ako profesor na renomovanej univerzite tak toje tvoja vec..inak ja ti ani poriadne nerozumiem co pises lebo ty miesas dve na tretie, pises tu o socializme a o tom ze zem je lacnejsia ako na zapade ja nechapem co tym chces povedat, ale to je jedno nechajme to tak, ja mam svoj nazor ty mas svoj a tym to zhaslo...

  • @Robbin846

    Najviac millionarov, mafiani a ciganske vudce mozna!:)

  • @Robbin846

    Napriklad v ozajnych kapitalistickych státoch na vychode, uz nikto nepracuje, len emigranti, ale oni majú tú "stabilitu".

    S obcianskou valkou más pravdu, ale ja myslim je to lepsi nez byt otrokom, raz vsetci národi co sa chcú oslobodit, musia pre to aj nieco robit.

  • @Veszett01 ***západe

  • @Robbin846

    Aj staré slovani uz boli silne zmiesany ak pozeras na geneticke vyzkumi mtDNA a yDNA. Staré slovania sú mixované z R1a, I1, I2 a N. Staré madari z R1a, N, Q, G2, J2. A povodni tu boli J2, E2, R1a, R1b, J1, I2, I1. Z toho ako robis argument, nebud chlupy!

    A aky vyznam to má, ze kto aky geneticky pramene má? Z toho nemozes byt slovákom, co je dolezitá, to je tvoja kultúra.

  • Az, hogy magyarok nem ismerik a szlovák történelmet nem azt jelenti, hogy nem létezik. Szlovákok hamarabb itt voltak Európában, mint magyarok. És nem szabad elfelejteni, hogy magyarok pogányok voltak és csak hozzáalkalmazkodtak az Európában élö népekhez, mert úgy éltek, mint rablók és bevándorlók. Ha valahova bevándorlok, az még nem azt jelenti, hogy az a föld az enyém (minthogy magyarok Felvidéken és Erdélyen stb). És ha engem nem szeretne egyik szomszédallamom se, akkor inkább csendben lennék!

  • @Rainer425

    Az hogy te nem ismered a ősmagyar történelmet, nem azt jelenti hogy nem létezik. Bár távol álljon tőlem hogy elsődlegesség alapján állitsak fel idióta hipotéziseket hogy kinek mire van joga. Bevándorló meg rabló, máshogy hangzik ha azt mondom, hogy győztes hóditó és rabló, kérlek, mondj egy hadsereget amelyik nem vitte a málhát, hadizsákmányt magával, rómától kezdve a pápai államig mindenki ezt teszi/tette. A korai magyar hadjáratok célja azonban nem csak ez volt...

  • @Rainer425

    ...hanem a politikai hatalom megszilárditása Európában, ez nyilvánvalóan következik a támadások irányától és politikai hátterétől. Szinte mindig egy harmadik fél, trónkövetelő, stb. odlalán történtek a beavatkozások a szilárd hatalom megingatására. Bevándorlok felvidékre, erdélybe? Mutass nekem valamit ami itt arra utal hogy valaha i szlovák települések magyarosodtak volna el, sok sikert:) Nevezetesen a magyarok által lakott felvidéki települések létrejötte...

  • @Rainer425

    ...a honfoglalás korára tehető, azt falvak városok nevei szinte mind kivétel nélkül magyar, avar, német, latin eredetűek. Nagyobb számú lakosság betelepülése már csak a csatorna hálózat megteremtése, az ingoványos területek kiszáritása után történt a korai királyság idejében. Erdély esetében erről meg nem is beszélhetünk, mivel az sohasem volt hun utód nemzeteken kivül mások által nagyobb számban lakva.Kulturális folytonosság van az avar, székely és magyar lakosság közt.

  • you are so stupid

  • another war, and we finished with Hungary

  • gay video , gay music , gay colour , gay country

  • @Matto623 szlovák? OTROK! Ha-ha-ha !

  • Hungrystanian fascist! They are just dreamers - JObbik and other Orbania´s radicals...

  • It is funny when rumanians speak about their great cultural heritage, while they maked a garbage heap from Transyvania since they foully stole it. It is clear for me, that their cheap lies and the hate toward us, are just covers for their disgusting subhuman behaviour in the past. Im not a prophet, but this system and period under jewish leadership will end soon, while the national identity of our neighboors is based on hate, I cant imagine what power will help them out from that agony...

  • NEW SLOVAKIA

    /watch?v=P1OrBLMnVAc&feature=r­elated

  • I LOVE THE LAST PICTURE <333

  • Dream on loosers, greetings from Serbia, rememmber 1918, and 1945, loosers

  • Trianon is justice!

  • Trianon-justice idiots dont want see the truth, that Ungarn-Uhorsko was NOT Magyaroszagh and it was NOT land of Magyars.

    This FEDERATION was started by Pribina (monarch of Blatnohrad/Panonia too) and Svätopluk, later Gejza and his son Štefan - born in Blatnohrad. Before year 890 there was no Magyars. This land was slovens - root of Slovaks. UHORSKO-UNGARN was FED of Slovaks, Serbs, Chorvats, Rumens and only 28% of Magyars.

    So if you want justice, give us back Panonia, and go back to Mongolia.

  • 80% of the names in Transylvania are of Hungarian origin, translated in Rumanian PHONETICLY or DIRECT TRANSLATION.

    TEMESVAR=TIMISOARA ( in Romanian doesn't mean anything ) in Hungarian means the FORTRESS on the TEMES river.

    KOLOZSVAR=CLUJ ( in Romanian doesn't mean anything ) in Hungarian means the FORTRESS at the WOODS.

    Nagyvarad=Oradea ( in Rumanian doesn't mean anything ) in hungarian the BIG FORTRESS.

    Even the ROMAN names like Napoca , Potaisa or Apulum had no CONTINUITY in Rumanian lan.

  • You Rumanians you don't even have a name for Transylvania.

    ARDEAL is a PHONETIC form for the Hungarian ERDELY, in Rumanian doesn't mean anything

    Transsylvania is in Latin, used in the Middle Ages, derived from the Hungarian ERDELY.

    What is the name for ERDELY in DACO or Roman Language since with your own words BUREBISTAS EMPIRE starts at the Black Sea all the way to todays France.

    The Contemporary Rumanian Historians say that his Empire reached all the way to Scotland and WELSH=WLACH

  • You forgot when Romania conquered Half of Hungary 2 times

  • @BBeenn13 when hungary had no army and romania was being a vulture ;-)

    like when 2 guy fight, one gets knocked down, and then a third guy comes (guess who) and kicks the guy on the floor and tells himself he has beaten him. :D

  • @bronkoghma it happened 2 times and i dont see what ur talking about

  • we Holy Land :(

  • Magyarország győztes ismét teljesítmény

  • I would go so far to say that Hungary should have let go the thief minorites by SLIGHTLY adjusting the borders (we can't have millions of romanian, slovakian traitors) but the crazy, barbaric Trianon Treaty had nothing to with Reality. This madness is also a defeat of 2000 years of "christianity"; no REAL christian nations create such a barbarism like the demonic Trianon Treaty. Screw the thief nations around Hungary; they will go down too!

  • There is no Romanian, Slovakian .... dominantion, there is Slovak, Romanian..... rightfull states .

  • @Nymirko how are some states "rightful" and others are not?

  • @bronkoghma

    I don t said anything about unrightful states.... I m just saying there is not something like "dominantion" ,there is normal states. And something else... why you are talking about Hungary kingdom? it is Uhorsko- multi national state.....it is like calling Soviet union only Russia.... or Jugoslavia only Serbia...

  • @Nymirko "I m just saying there is not something like "dominantion""

    i have a relative who is a slovak of hungariran descent. he (and his parents) has been taught to be ashamed of his ethnicity. ever heard of beneš decree? slovakia still didn't give back what it took by it.

    "Hungary kingdom? it is Uhorsko"

    hungary is in english, uhorsko in slovakian (?), you're saying USA and Spojené štáty americké aren't the same? :D

    "it is like calling Soviet union only Russia"

    absolutely not

  • @bronkoghma

    absolutely yes, Uhorkso was multi-nacional state

  • @Nymirko ok, first , SPEAK ENGLISH, use english names for countries.

    you're referring to hungarian kingdom? multi-national? there were no "nations" in middle ages and hence no multi-national states. of course the inhabitants were ethnically mixed, but we both know that. so what did you mean by this? judging by the context of our discussion, you could only mean that hungarians weren't the elite. BUT THEY WERE.

    and in yugoslavia republics united. hungarians conquered the neighbouring people.

  • @bronkoghma there were no "nations" in middle ages.... but we can say who was Slavs and who come from east..... you are true when you are saying in Uhorsko was most nobles talk hungarian, but it isn t important (for me)

  • @Nymirko "you are true when you are saying in Uhorsko was most nobles talk hungarian, but it isn t important (for me)"

    then waht IS important? what was the point of this then? why did you even say it was a multi-national state? what were trying to say??

    and you persisting on using a slovak name for a foreing country in a conversation in ENGLSIH is childish - what are you trying to prove?

    the kingdom is called hungarian in english, it was created by hungarians and it remained hungarian

  • @bronkoghma

    ...it was created by hungarians .....

    you wrote there was not nations in middle age...you don t know what you wrote, so have your words import?

  • @Nymirko you don't know what you read.

    i said "there were no "nations" in middle ages and hence no multi-national states. of course the inhabitants were ethnically mixed"

    "nation" ("nacija" in slovakian?) is a political term. of course different "peoples" ("narod"?) existed, different ethnicities.

  • @bronkoghma

    I agree

  • @Nymirko

    You are on the con-nationalist point of view, and I admire it, as long as we dont make a reference on the borders in the WW2 or on the option of a common union. The tragedy is that there was no ethnical question before the Trianon decision, expect was of course, a panslavist minority. Stefanik said himself, that they had to chose betwen the referendum and the slovak state.

  • @Nymirko

    And slovakia is a multinational state too. So southern slovakia is not Slovakia today? Good to know, I thinked you are chauvinist, now I see that you agree with borders maked on ethnic basis.

  • Just look anthropology maps about average pigmentation!Type in google image searcher:"hair color map"or type:"eye color map"Romanians have darker average pigmentation(brown monkey eye color, dark hair)Their average body stature is smaller.They have semi-asian primitive orthodox "culture".The vast majority of romanians were shepherd nomads until the 17th century.Learn genetics,don't forget your high ratio of middle-eastern haplogroups!That's why Hungarians call them gypsy nation.

  • hungary XI-XII is the first secole in your film , hahaha

    so...hungarians come from asia , go in homeland idiots !

  • @FalenGood HAha according to genetic studies, sorrounding countries have more asian markers haplogroups than prensent-day Hungarians. The average pigmentation (eye hair and skin color) of Hungarians are lighter than the romanian slovak or serbian average pigmentation. Our culture is western (catholic-protestant) until the orthodox countries have semi-asian orthodox culture. Learn history: EDUCATOR(.)UW.(.)HU

  • @celebration81 hey, Mengele, darker pigmentation doesn't indicate Asian descent... you're a complete moron. All Mediterranean populations have darker pigmentation, the closer you get to the tropics & equator, the darker the pigmentation. Orthodoxy is not "semi-asian", try to read some history books. Your explanations are pure BS. But I'm glad you're such a moron.

  • @FalenGood

    from what language have you taken the word "secula"? Anyway you probably wanted to use the word segment. I think that I can answer your question: Before that time period you lot , romanians were difficult to find in Transylvania, by the end of XIII. century there was three romanian villages there only. You people went to south of Danube i.e. the Balkans at 271AD when the Romans left and did not come back for a thousand years. If you came from Transylvania at all.

  • @kenguru55 "there was three romanian villages there only"-quote the source, don't blabber. be exact.

    "You people went to south of Danube i.e. the Balkans at 271AD"-only Roman administration and those who could afford moved. the majority of the remaining Dacian population had preferred to stay. plus there are NO sources that talk about a south to north migration from the Balkans.

  • @aquario008 , you cannot "debate" with Kenguru, because Kenguru, "has impecable sources written in Latin, English, German and Hungarian". And of course, only 2-3 countries present the "communist" theory of the origin of Romanians. The rest of them present how the Hungarians, the multi-millenar European civilisation with the dominant R1a Slavic marker, just let Romanians come in the kingdom out of good will. And of course, the oldest hungarian document is false. I am enlightened now!

  • @kenguru55 I don't know what is "secula" ...

  • @FalenGood

    how about secole ? And what language is it ? What does it means?

  • in what language is it "secula" and what does it means? yeah...

  • Hungayrian owner removed high-rated comments! it had to be expected,hungarian runs from truth like it's the plague.

  • @I4717I valch sheperds r not even one nation. Such an inferior like the slovaks. No erchelogical facts proves any of this slovaks or vlachs were here when we arrive here. Who r the asians ??? The slavs have a round face like an stiky cheese (like escimos), the vlachs look like behave like and smell like gypsies. This inferior nations had no countries , culture and even was not able to create own language. Our language one of the oldest on planet

  • @derekutca Sorry, who are you trying to convince to what you wrote? I know that your hungarian butt is hurt alot because you don't fit in our continent, and your language is ugliest ever, but I have my own opinion on good people from Slovakia etc. ;3

  • @I4717I Yes, you little "gameboy", you are a racist! You are full of hate as well. You call the Hungarians "mongols" when in fact it was the Hungarians/Magyars who fought the mongol hoards twice in history. Research of Magyar (hungarian) DNA show only trace evidence of asian origin and it is no more pronounced than what you find in any other Eastern-European people's DNA! So there goes your "mongol" theory. I saw your channel page, it reflects the mindset of a six year old....

  • @heintagel , your hypocrisy has no limits.....you know very well everywhere outside Hungary it is learned other version of history and with justified reasons. The presence of Romanians in Transylvania before Hungarians is mentioned is multiple chronicles including Simon Kezai, Descriptio Europa Orientalis, the oldest turkish chronicle Oguzmane, the chronicle of Nestor, etc. It is also acknoledged by the majority of historians even among your own. It is even confirmed archeologically...

  • @heintagel ,@heintagel , actually there is a genetical connection between Hungarians and the Madjari people from Kazaksthan. Here is the official study:

    h t t p : // onlinelibrary(.)wiley(.)com/do­i/10.1002/ajpa.20984/abstract

    If you have questions about any chronicles, arheological locations, historians, feel free to pm me i'll send you clear links. No, i don't "hate" you or any hungarians, but i really do hate Gypsies and i hope you understand the danger represented by gypsy animals

  • @heintagel , and almost forgot. Here is a respectable enciclopedy:

    ".......Between the 10th and 14th centuries new political formations emerged in the Carpathian-Danube region. The Hungarians, who had settled in Pannonia at the end of the 9th century and who entered Dacia in the 10th century, overwhelmed the Slavic-Romanian duchies, or voivodates, that they encountered there"

    Britannica Enciclopedy

    Source:

    britannica(.)com/EBchecked/top­ic/508461/Romania/42864/Romani­ans-and-Hungarians

  • @gogoasacenusie

    Your source is anything but credible.It is constantly edited from issue to issue. Rumania's hated dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu also had a hand in the development of the Daco-Roman theory. According to non - Romanian history books: after the Romans left Dacia, today's Transylvania in AD 271 for a thousand years there were only migrating tribes there closely following each other: There were two notable groups :First the old Germanic tribes, than the huns, avars and the magyars.

  • @kenguru55 , if you have a problem with Britannica Enciclopedy, the US Library of Congress and pretty all the history books from the entire planet Earth, then please, go ahead and tell them to change history according to the hungarian version. Even more, your own oldest hungarian chronicle Gesta Hungarorum and a dozen others say the same thing that Romanians were already in Transylvania. With this only and your "debate" is closed. Of course, in your ignorance, not even your own sources are good 

  • @gogoasacenusie

    "all the history books"- not all - the Romanian ones and maybe some French and Americans ones.

    Gesta Hungarorum- not written in Hungarian, not by a Hungarian, not for Hungarians so it is not Hungarian.

    Don't want to "debate" with me, LOL. Don't be scared of me. I have impeccable sources, Written in Latin, English, German and Hungarian.

    Regarding of Britannica Enciclopedy, the US Library of Congress they said the right thing for a while then they changed their tune. Hmmm...

  • @kenguru55 , There is no need to "debate" because there is no "debate". You can just open any history book from this planet to confirm it. You have "impecable" sources you say? Good for you, because you see, there is officially not even a single historical chronicle mentioning the origin of Vlachs as being anywhere in south Balkans. That besides all the history books and even genetics ( see Eupedia ) where the E1b1b Balkanic marker is even lower than Hungary's. Have fun wanking at your dreams...

  • @gogoasacenusie I still want to see a source which says there were only 3 Romanian villages in Transylvania in the XIV cent. He said that he has "impecable sources"? I'd like to see this one, for starters...

  • @aquario008 , you don't understand. If Kenguru has "impeccable sources, Written in Latin, English, German and Hungarian" then he cannot be contradicted. That's it man, we are caught. I will personally email every single history book from this planet to change history according to Kenguru and the hungarians

  • @gogoasacenusie i see your discussing the origin of romanians - what are your thoughts on the matter?

  • @bronkoghma , the Romanian ethnogenesis consists of Dacians, Romans, Slavs and Cumans. These are the main elements and it's world-wide recognized. Today the closest genetical relatives of Romanians are Bulgarians and Hungarians. The genetical markers which show clearly who a people is can be easily seen on the genetical map of Europe's populations from Eupedia and can be traced with proper historical sources with links not cheap propaganda like our fellow hungarian friends

  • @gogoasacenusie "it's world-wide recognized."

    origin of the modern romanians is a controversial issue.

    "show clearly who a people is"

    there's nothign "clear" about genetic research in history

    "from Eupedia " wait, so this: "Dacians, Romans, Slavs and Cumans" is your opinion or from eupedia? they give specific genet. markers historical names? that's total nonsense. it has nothign to do with science.

    doing that is on the same scientific level as those propaganda sites you mention

  • @bronkoghma , take a look at this.

    "Romanians descend from the Dacians, an ancient people who fell under Rome's dominance in the first century A.D., intermarried with Roman colonists, and adopted elements of Roman culture, including a Vulgar Latin that evolved into today's Romanian"

    US Library of Congress

    Source: memory(.)loc(.)gov/cgi-bin/que­ry/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+ro­0011)

  • @bronkoghma ,

    "The blood kinship between today Romanian or Wallach and his Dacian ancestors two thousand years ago reveals striking similarity to their appearance, not only in terms of facial features and hair, but in keeping unchanged the port as we see the many faces of Dacian warriors defeated on some sculptures dedicated to the glorification of the victories of Trajan (especially the Column and the Arch of Triumph in Rome)."

    Heinrich Kiepert

  • @bronkoghma , and one more thing. The "the "daco-roman origin" of Romanians was mentioned by the german Martin Opitz in 1622 by the romanian Nicolaus Olahus the Archbishop of Esztergom and Primate of Hungary, around 1500, by the Pope Eneas Silvius Piccolomini, and all italian humanists including Antonio Bonfini in the 14th century. The "migration theory" appeared in the 18th century and it was a political response to the national awakening of Romanians ( as well as other people in that time)

  • @bronkoghma , there is much to say and debate and if you're interested in anything please pm me and we'll further debate based on checkable evidence of course. I mentioned about the "cheap propaganda" because Hungarians are known to falsify history of others including Romanians, Serbs, Slovaks, Czechs, etc. Don't believe me, just ask them. I don't think that you, as a Croatian like to see your country incorporated in an artificial kingdom like the Kingdom of Hungary. I simply wrote a fact.

  • @gogoasacenusie "with links not cheap propaganda"

    nevermind that (when talking to me), i have no interest in "historical claims". i just wanted to discuss with you about the origin of romanians. on what do you base your adherence to dacian theory? (except that genetics site, which i don't want to talk about) did the dacians stay in romania the entire time?

  • @bronkoghma , i don't think there is even a sense to say it's a "theory" since it's worldwide accepted and logical. Take for example the Strategikon of Kekaumenos from the 11th century where the Vlachs ( Romanians ) are described as being "Dacians and Bessi". Ancient Dacia was geographically Romania + Moldavia from today, compare the maps. Even the traditional Dacian clothes as depicted on Trajan's column are identical to Romanians from today..There are endless things to say including archeology

  • @heintagel Thanks for your response, sir. I'm sure I will become as adult as you are some day, for interests indeed measure how mature one is. I also recommend you an attempt to comprehend how significant language can be for national identity. Now is there some way I can tro... help you?

  • @heintagel so hungarian lands=stolen; hungarian people=stolen vlahs,slavs and later germans; hungarian architecture=0; most important hungarian kings=foreigners; hungarian nobel winners=all non-hungarian origins; hungarian language=non-european...hungar­y=european my ass.

  • @I4717I How proud you are, how european you are! You pick on other people's language just because it is different than yours. How intelligent is that, woawww...! If you go to Japan btw. you will find interesting how many schools teaches the hungarian language and how popular it is among japanese students. It is actually the most popular eastern-european language studied there!

    But you wouldn't care anyways. You are a proud "european"...

  • king Mathias Corvin was romanian :)))

  • @33Bulan33 another fake romanian crap! keep up kid people like you make romania to a fucking retard in everybody's eyes.

  • @narut0cska , no. He is actually right.

    "János Hunyadi was of Walachian (a region now in Romania) ancestry."

    Britannica Enciclopedy

    Source: britannica(.)com/EBchecked/top­­ic/277182/Janos-Hunyadi

    Corvin was his son.

  • @gogoasacenusie you know that region was hungarian. hungarians lived there.

    so please cut the crap out and shove your fake history up your heinie

  • @narut0cska , there is no "fake history". This what is learned anywhere in the world. Even the oldest hungarian historical chronicle, Gesta Hungarorum says that when Attila came first in Transylvania he encountered Romanians and Slavs living there. If you deny even your historical sources, then you have other "types" of problems my friend. Stop hating, peace!

  • @gogoasacenusie im not hating im beliving in the real history. btw the whole world learns hungarian history.everybudy agrees with us. dont question my opinion cuz i have contacts with other nation in other continants and they are sayin what im sayin'. they know hungary never gave up. they defended whole europe fromthe ottomans. romanians bacame one with them. hungary never obeyed for the soviets. romania gave up right before any fight. even your crap would be true we deserve that land not like u

  • @narut0cska , well it seems the British don't learn the hungarian version. Neither the French. Neither the Italians. Neither the Spanish. Neither your good buddies, the Poles. You know, if you just read your own hungarian chronicles you'd be shocked. You literally live in a bubble my dear friend. But i want to send you a message and to all the hungarians - we need to stand UNITED AGAINST GYPSIES this is an urgent problem. The situation in our countries is critical, let's act NOW

  • @gogoasacenusie Good, go fight the gypsies if you want to. You know, on the other hand, nobody expect any sympathy from people like you. The victim of a robbery would be naive to expect any sympathy from the perpetrators, wouldn't he? Well, all the surrounding countries got a nice chunk of the 1000 year old independant, Christian state of Hungary. Why would you be sympathetic right? You all want to keep the stolen goods, you all benefited from the crime. That is exactly the case...

  • @gogoasacenusie actually i would warn others about the gipsy facts...but as long as (espacially the slovaks, romanians) pissis me off with this bunch of shity "allegadley true" histories...we r loosing the main subject .I think all European culture in 12 hour endanger by the gypsies...if in every eastern Eu. countries we would not have the proper gov.soon the gypsies will over breed us by 2050 . need to cut off all benefit, and should fire arms liberalised..like in finland or slotakia

  • @gogoasacenusie You are wrong! Gesta Hungarorum mentions the Hungarians encountering wlachs and slavs north of the Danube river! It does not say anywhere that they came across these people in Transylvania. And the territory between the Carpathians and the Danube exactly where the only land that ever belonged to the so-called "romanians" could be found. It was called Wallachia and has nothing to do with Transylvania. Later they took lands from the Bulgarians, Hungarians etc; A patchwork nation.

  • Its always fun to watch how ppl spit @ each others faces in the forums after these vids.....its sooooo funny......but also disgusting.......doesnt really matter....I WILL NEVA GO DOWN TO YOUR LEVEL...EVEN IF YOU WANT ME 2......and dats wot differentiates a "Western European" from you dogs fighting over a piece of crap, what you call "objective justice"......oh one more last thing.....theres no such idea as "objective truth"

  • and who do you think really gives a flying fuck about your "1000 AD Hungarian nobles"? The fact is your peasants (outnumbering your "noblemen") were speaking a Central-Asian Mongolese, while vlachs were speaking a form of Latin. In 860 CE, Emmerich von Elwangen mentions "Sunt his Germanique truces et Sarmata bellax-atque Getae nec non Bastarnae semina gentis-Dacorumque manus et Martia pectori Alani.". Who were those "gentis-Dacorumque", biatch? Oh, wait, all Dacians were abducted...

  • @aquario008 the "biatch' is you..and the whore is your mother...lol more wiki sources? and were did these "Dacorumque " live? south of the Danube....take your tatarish brown ugly faces and go back to where you belong. btw...how was the welfare line today?

  • @szatmari1 your mom farted you out of her ass, she made you with a male yak on the Mongol steppes... stupid bozgor.... welfare is what your pop ejaculates in your mouth after staring at Playboy TV for 10 hours... you're just Madjar shit... you don't belong in Europe

  • @aquario008 my my...what quick responses...unemployment was good for you today...get a life moron, get a job like the whore that bore you...she's on the corner 24/7 rain or shine.

  • @szatmari1 if you're a little unemployed shit scrapping a meager existence in MexiCali that doesn't mean everybody else is like you, little turd... tell your mom to stop putting so much sugar in that gulash she calls "lunch" - which she actually gets out of her cunt every month....

  • @aquario008 you poor pathetic creature, I'm not the one bragging about bonuses and paychecks...only unemployed internet trolls like yourself feel its necessary to do so. Your "profanity" is hilarious, very childlike you can't even cuss like a man....lol what a dimwit

  • @szatmari1 I'm not the one who started bragging, shithead. You talked about "unemployment" and shit. If I can't cuss how come you respond, pimple-faced HunGAYrian?

  • Comment removed

  • @szatmari1 But are you a man, szweetMary ? It doesn't show, you speak like an apprentice-whore,very proud about her debut in dirty talk.

  • @MrsCraiessou "szweetMary "....this the language of a man?lol its bad enough to be roumanian, but a fag too.

  • @szatmari1 Who told you I'm a man? I'm an Amazone in disguise and I eat bozgors for breakfast.Happy New Year,bufoon!

  • @MrsCraiessou.... "Amazone...bufoon!" lol .....coming from the mouth of a "true" roumanian, bozgor prosti

  • @szatmari1 Romanian men don't loose their time with little pusta chimpanzees like you,such a small hunt is usually left to women and children. Give up,bozgor prost,the only" hungarian land "you will ever win is in some Budapestan graveyard, but I wish you a long happy life till then.

  • @MrsCraiessou says..."Who told you I'm a man?".....no one said castrated orphans are men

  • @aquario008 yes you point it well. After the army of rome left Erdély/transilv. Goths arrived and rulled for 300 years in transilv. This days the historians and languistic clearly proved : The vlachs were not there in Erdély/transilvania...i they would were there they could adopt/boroved a few germanic words at least from the goths. BUT !! The vlachs "romanians" heva 27% of albanian worlds! So the vlachs were still on a north albanian tree and moved up in the 16 century to the area they r now

  • @derekutca goths' presence in Transylvania was very limited and they did NOT sedentarize or mix with the local populace. that is why there are no words of gothic provenance in Romanian. the words of common ancestry between Albanian & Romanian are NOT 27% (who gave you this ridiculous figure?), & can be easily explained through the common thraco-dacian substratum. you are simply too idiot to understand lingustics, hun.

  • @aquario008 , lol 27% common words with Albanian?! You can count by fingers tha Albanian words in Romanian language :D:D The Hungarian propaganda really has no limits neither in persistence nor stupidness.....

  • @gogoasacenusie EVEN IF there were 27% common words, Albanian apparently has both an Ilyrian substrate AND a Dacian substrate (the free Dacians Carpii have ended up in that area after 370 e.n). Since Thracian, Getae-Dacian & Illyrian languages had a common ancestry, it would be simple to understand the connections between the languages which have some similarities in terms of substratum words coming from any of these 3 (or 4) ancient languages...

  • @aquario008 , you have to explain that in Madjari language, you know the people from Kazakhstan genetically related to Hungarians, because they can't understand other language.

  • @gogoasacenusie jaj istenem, unfortunately I do not speak Madjari.... I can ask for some help with translating into Hungarian though, but I wouldn't hold my breath until the message I posted gets through the thick skulls of people like derekutca...

  • @aquario008

    "goths' presence in Transylvania was very limited and they did NOT sedentarize or mix with the local populace"

    This is simply wishful thinking, do you have access to the history of the Goths?

    1, The Goths did not tolerate anyone but their own kind.

    2, They had over six major battles with the Carpi in ten years, in the end the Carpi run away to the Romans.

    3, The Goths followed them in 80 years later because the Huns were coming back to their homeland i.e.the Carpathian Basin.

  • @kenguru55 "The Goths did not tolerate anyone but their own kind" exactly what I said, dimwit, read again (they did not sedentarize or mix)

    "They had over six major battles with the Carpi". shithead, it's exactly the opposite, the Carpi & Goths allied AGAINST Romans. Some of the Carpis ended being settled first near Pecs & then south of th Balkans as foederati.

    "Huns were coming back to their homeland" IDIOT, Huns were never in the Carpathian basin before 400 e.n.

  • @aquario008 Linguistic studies are not the past represented biological racial history, THEREFORE learn population genetics (which is a real science), instead of romantic nationalistic romanian myths

  • @celebration81 "Analysis of the genetic distance between Romanians and other Europeans who have been studied serologically are consistent with the hypothesis that Romanians descend from Roman ancestors who colonized Dacia between the 1st century B.C. and 1st century A.D." U.S. National Library of Medicine

  • @celebration81 "The Madjars are a previously unstudied population from Kazakhstann.Their name bears a striking resemblance to the Magyars who have inhabited Hungary for over a millennium.Genetic distances based on haplogroup frequencies were used to compare the Madjars with 37 other populations and showed that they were closest to the Hungarian population rather than their geographical neighbors." A Y-chromosomal comparison of the Madjars (Kazakhstan) and the Magyars (Hungary) A.Z. Bíró A. Zalán

  • @aquario008

    and you are an open minded intelligent person , anyone who dares to disagree is a moron, idiot etc. LOL, you probably got this method from your beloved leader Nicolae Ceaușescu.

    Regarding the Goths and other old German tribes, they were in Transylvania/Erdély between 271(when the romans left) and about 400 AD (when the huns drove them out too.) But where were the rumanians?

    Before you call other names learn English properly and don't mix in different languages into your text..

  • @kenguru55

    Ceaușescu was an idiot who was despised by a lot of Romanians including myself. You probably weren't even born when I was in the streets in 89-99 manifesting against communism. I simply cannot stand stupidity like that displayed by the Hungarian irredentists here on YT.

    Between 271-400 AD, there were Dacian settlements in Transylvania. Dacians are direct ancestors of Romanians. Do you know history?

    Where did I mix languages? Show me and then talk, fuckhead.

  • @aquario008 It's okay don't get excited. You and the rest of you Wallachs aint proving shit to anyone. NOBODY IN EUROPE OR THE WORLD gives two shits about your country, Because the fact is, the true nature and identity of Romanians is supressed even to common Wallachs like you, because the simple truth is you are inferior. You have no history, no identity, and no language. What you have you stole from others, but you still presist to beat your chest like the primite apes that you are.

  • @TudatThought7Imagine We don't need to prove shit to anyone,especially to shits like you. We KNOW who we are and we don't care what Europe or the world thinks., quite honestly. Only insecure buttfucks like you need Europe's and the world's approval. The simple truth is that you have Mengele's mentality and you have no idea about history, you inferior little fart. BTW, we are ALL evolved apes, shithead... go back to school & learn something.

  •  how 'bout that, bozgor?

    LOL......how 'bout what? you call your unemployment compensation a "bonus"

    what a poponar!

  • @szatmari1 I think you're projecting, bozgor, "unemployment compensation" is something your poor bozgor dad fixed up for ya with Schwarzy's help.... retarded Mongol

  • Its nice to get get a paycheck..have an education...too bad these impotent, clowns... aquario008, 4717I, unurautare have neither...these 3 stooges just vent their frustrations continually here at this Hungarian video. Poor roumanian dogs, bark till your hearts content, no body gives a crap what you say

  • @szatmari1 I bet your salary that my Christmas bonus was bigger than your paycheck... how 'bout that, bozgor?

  • @I4717I szatmari1 is being paid by Szoros and the Orban government in Budapest to attack Romanians ane everyone who doesn't agree that hunGAYrians are the oldest people in Europe... him and that old fart Damaszkusz are the laughing stock of YT...

  • @aquario008 Huh then I pretty suck compared to him, I am paid only by some small town association from Piatra Neamt. :S

  • @I4717I roumanians are fakes..just like you. A frustrated little troll who thinks that he's got some type of intelligence... Very good...."hungolians"....lol thats about your speed, I wouldn't have expected anything less. Thats right, we don't have a European language, and I'm very proud of that fact.

  • @szatmari1 Your knowledge about region is so high that you don't even know what fakes are? :3 "thinks that he's got some type of intelligence" - yeah, you know... everybody got some type of intelligence, you too, very bad type I may add. =( Speed?... That reminds me asian productions when they focus on speed mostly, is that why you mention that out of the blue? Not having European language and trying to be European is funny. Language is a very important factor.

  • @I4717I ...english I see isn't one of your strong points either...lol ..."Speed = Style" Ignorant people such as yourself naturally post ignorant comments....But it is funny how you keep returning (trolling) at this Hungarian video just like those other frustrated dogs (roumanians)

  • @szatmari1 Since you can't surrpas me in knowledge I see you point out that I don't know the language natively used in country you live in as well as you do. How about talking in Polish or Russian, mr. linguist? I guess German wouldn't be your strong point either, though same about me in that matter. speed=style must be some stupid slang anyway, please find some nicer point then, perhaps, I will laugh or something. And if you call correcting your mistakes trolling then you're quite pathetic...

  • Btw claiming to speak 2 separate languages.. polish and russian is like claiming to speak English and Irish...hahahaha buffoon!..."hungolians" this is your speed/style that of a 5 yr. old.... since this is all your limited mentality can understand....slav(e)

  • @I4717I what knowledge do you possess? That Hungarians stole Land? who's land? what country existed in 896? What mistakes are you correcting? Keep trolling here you racist dimwit and I'll prove what an inept, ignorant and illiterate moron you really are....

  • @szatmari1 ever heard of Great Moravia? and not only from moravs but also romanians,it says that right in your Gesta that slavs and romanians lived in Pannonia when asians arrived,trick.

  • @szatmari1 stupid f-cking Szoros-sponsored irredentist cigany-magyar, are you still trolling YT?... retarded cocksucker...

  • Comment removed

  • Its upsetting that a people from asia (Magyar) have an older country in EUROPE and have contributed more to EUROPEAN culture and civilization than roumanians and slavs combined, isn't it?. Keep trolling here, dimwit I'll give you a good education. Btw...our (Hun) forefathers were in EUROPE hundreds of yrs. before the arrival of the slavs...So it seems we (HUN-Garians) have more right to the lands of Europe than you.

  • @szatmari1 hungarians didn't contribute with anything good or important,the greatest kings of Hungary were or french and romanian origin,wannabe european idiot.

  • @unurautare szatmari1 was schooled in USA... so you can only imagine how much history the retarded cocksucker knows... he's been sponsored by Szoros to go to California and suck Magyar irredenta diaspora... he's an idiot

  • @szatmari1 btw how are you more tied to the lands when all you're doing in "Szekeyland" is to illegally cut down the forests and make another Gobi desert there?