why should we cry for federer and not for nadal ? I can't understand the criteria ? Just because nadal was 20 years old and could have won in the coming years doesn't mean he didn't want it as bad as federer did. Besides, the other argument could be that hey, federer has already won many wimbies . . . somebody else must get a taste of the trophy now.
yeh the stadium should be full up but these places get alot of money for selling the tickets to like company parties and the tickets are all inclusive so they've started playin tennis and the people from the companys r still inside havin a booze up!!!!! thts y there r empty seats at wimbledon centre court n e way
This is my favorite match in the recent USO. After this match, The Fed got his mojo back and order is restored in the universe. The man is just amazing!
Except for those stupid kids. Seriously, there were so many times during USA's broadcast where you could here kids voices cheering "Come on Andreeeeev".They were too young to even realize they were mispronouncing his name, but that didn't stop them.
They deliberately cheered against Federer yet stayed to watch the last day session match because it was Federer. Ignorant little kids getting a chance to watch a legend and can't even show a little respect.
o wow a 20 year old with years n years of dominance to come, missed out in 07. instead it went to a guy going for his 5th straight. wow thats SUCH A PITY. lets all have a cry for a guy who had nothing to lose and was obviously going to win some other year. boo fucking hoo
@10aces Yeah I remember watching that shit too. Except I kept hearing "Come on Igor!" I was just like, seriously? You don't realize how lucky you are to be sitting in Arthur Ashe Stadium in New York City at the U.S. Open watching Roger Fucking Federer play tennis? Bunch of rich spoiled brats if you ask me.
ahaha 0:18 poor ball boy at igor =p
mitchieee89 2 years ago 2
when i watched this i honostly thought federer was going to lose but as usual federer proves us wrongg!
kusta345 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
why should we cry for federer and not for nadal ? I can't understand the criteria ? Just because nadal was 20 years old and could have won in the coming years doesn't mean he didn't want it as bad as federer did. Besides, the other argument could be that hey, federer has already won many wimbies . . . somebody else must get a taste of the trophy now.
Cappuccinodude 2 years ago
i'm surprised the stadium wasn't completely full. is this how it is in early rounds cause i thought someone like Fed would sell out the stadium?
nali82 3 years ago
yeh the stadium should be full up but these places get alot of money for selling the tickets to like company parties and the tickets are all inclusive so they've started playin tennis and the people from the companys r still inside havin a booze up!!!!! thts y there r empty seats at wimbledon centre court n e way
blowingbubbles123 3 years ago
Thanks for posting this, I'm really glad the rockstar NY crowd adopted Fed after such a hard year.
Do you mind me asking, How much were your tickets and where did you get them from?
928vamoskata 3 years ago 5
This is my favorite match in the recent USO. After this match, The Fed got his mojo back and order is restored in the universe. The man is just amazing!
lou120878 3 years ago 26
americans love federer because he is the greatest player ever.
who care's bout that damn nadal
fordrmani 3 years ago 25
Except for those stupid kids. Seriously, there were so many times during USA's broadcast where you could here kids voices cheering "Come on Andreeeeev".They were too young to even realize they were mispronouncing his name, but that didn't stop them.
They deliberately cheered against Federer yet stayed to watch the last day session match because it was Federer. Ignorant little kids getting a chance to watch a legend and can't even show a little respect.
10aces 3 years ago 32
geez lighten up n let kids be kids
butterflycaught900 3 years ago
No.
10aces 3 years ago 2
wimbledon 2008 5th set, federer had a break point to go to 5-3
butterflycaught900 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
What a pity.
10aces 3 years ago
yes
butterflycaught900 3 years ago
so if he wins it this year i will just be like "he was 1 point away from having 7 in a row :( :(
butterflycaught900 3 years ago 2
wimbledon 2007 5th set, nadal hat two break points to go 2-3 up and just hold serve to win the match and title. . . what a pity
Cappuccinodude 2 years ago
o wow a 20 year old with years n years of dominance to come, missed out in 07. instead it went to a guy going for his 5th straight. wow thats SUCH A PITY. lets all have a cry for a guy who had nothing to lose and was obviously going to win some other year. boo fucking hoo
butterflycaught900 2 years ago
@10aces Yeah I remember watching that shit too. Except I kept hearing "Come on Igor!" I was just like, seriously? You don't realize how lucky you are to be sitting in Arthur Ashe Stadium in New York City at the U.S. Open watching Roger Fucking Federer play tennis? Bunch of rich spoiled brats if you ask me.
dwilliams02 7 months ago
is this the final break point?
1point0tennis 3 years ago 7
Yes, the break that gave him control of the 5th set.
nishantkaus 3 years ago