Ough, didn't know that we weren't the actual developers of the scorm specs - my bad. Padon moi ^_^
Althought, as i'm a developer i would cut their hands off for such a thing like "incompability" with the older versions. I always thought that the scrom standart differs from version to version only with the amount of details (i.e. data) that transfers from client -> server and backwards.
@MrJloa We don't create the SCORM spec. We just make sure it works for people. And one way is by making all our stuff work for both 1.2 and 2004 so people don't even have to think about this issue. And yes, it's a little crazy that they aren't backwards compatible. Just another one of the things that make SCORM tough to implement.
This has been flagged as spam show
see your beautiful girl here naneedj.info
amalsee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Date and Russian lady ** leefoxnow.info **
CfdrBvgfnm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russian ladies online ** leefoxnow.info **
monica48porurfhf 1 year ago
Ough, didn't know that we weren't the actual developers of the scorm specs - my bad. Padon moi ^_^
Althought, as i'm a developer i would cut their hands off for such a thing like "incompability" with the older versions. I always thought that the scrom standart differs from version to version only with the amount of details (i.e. data) that transfers from client -> server and backwards.
MrJloa 1 year ago
omfg, how can u upgrade a format without a back compability, people?
Even html5 fully supports html4 and even html3.
LoL
MrJloa 1 year ago
@MrJloa We don't create the SCORM spec. We just make sure it works for people. And one way is by making all our stuff work for both 1.2 and 2004 so people don't even have to think about this issue. And yes, it's a little crazy that they aren't backwards compatible. Just another one of the things that make SCORM tough to implement.
RusticiSoftware 1 year ago
too quiet
joecushman 1 year ago