those who disliked should be left to wonder the desert on bare feet while carrying three 7th edition calc books by Stewart!!! Im done with calc and i still watch these vids to refresh on integration for my differential eqns
If I should have watched this video yesterday. i would have got a good score in our seatwork just lately :( how sad.. Anyway, a big credit to the owner of this video. Thumbs up for you dude!
It's only fitting i post my first ever youtube comment for you. My utmost appreciation for this awesome work you do. You and your videos got me through my first semester calculus. Mature age uni student from down under. Good on ya mate!!
im just wondering what if the denominator is not perfectly factor-able, and leaves a remainder? can you still use this partial fraction thing to solve it?
You are my god, and the only reason I'm not failing. My teacher is the worst I've ever had. We started with 20 now have 7, and half of those 7 are failing. I'm hanging on solely because of you. TYSM
I have to write this comment, otherwise I'd feel guilty It's 1:15am ...and i have been watching and doing my homework since 1:00pm. The one thing that I love is that you make me hold on to calculus. I know that i'd be a slacker without you. I am so grateful and thankful for the knowledge you share. I will pray that you reach all your goals in life.
@bmdoubleuu Yes you are right; b/c the "value" of the numerator is one less than the denominator...its like what he said if you had an expression to the 30th degree....each degree is built upon a "original" expression. For example X^2...this is built upon x*x...its the same concept just different scenario. Its just not practical for exams and what not...just like taking derivatives of higher degrees like taking a derivative 8 times...then again tabular integration is another thing in calc 2.xD
10:15 you said the first thing can be done using u substitution, but how would you substitute for the first one? Isn't that a natural log function too? ln(x+2)
I hate Partial Fractions! I never could get the coefficients or know how to break up the thing in the first place. These vids are a major help. Thank you! <3 <3 <3
@Hackiesacker007 actually you could have up to the 52nd because there is both uppercase and lowercase letters. and thats not why people in foreign countries are better than us at math. their number systems are more logical, and most countries attend school for much longer each day and less vacations.
@0Valkyr0 it's crazy... in macedonia they learn OUR 9th grade algebra in THEIR 6th grade. And they have just 5 hour school days. Over there they are unbelievably loaded with work, but the sad thing is, in that country they cant put their smarts to much use because their higher education system sucks so they try to come to america. however, they cant get into universities here because some usa uni's see that the uni system in southern europe sucks, so they think the rest of it does too :(
The problem is, when one is writing an invigilated test/exam...in which a partial fraction decomposition is only a side problem, of a problem...one does not have the luxury to sit back and go through the above procedure. Furthermore, the above procedure may be found in any of the plethora of calculus/mathematical methods books.
@oOOpIIIqOOo ...I have already posted in my channel`s comments section, about two weeks ago, a more efficient method. I used it to show the missing detail in a problem taken from "Practical Quantum Mechanics" by Siegfried Fluegge. Maybe tomorrow i`ll post an example, or two in my channel.
it's a quadratic factor, but it doesn't have an additional term to it. if it was x ^ 2+1 then it would be bx + c. The only reason you need to put an x in there is to show that there are 2 different variables in the numerator while still remaining a true statement.
why don't you have to put bx over x^2? i thought since it was sqared you have to put a number in front... or is that only if it is a polynomial squared? (at like 18 min)
You're always so chill in these videos. I'm always SO fucking stressed when I watch these.
mcovalt 1 day ago
Thanks for this! I needed a refresher for my partial differentials test tomorrow!
slappytheelephant 4 days ago
17:49 Thats what she Said!!!
rtojj 1 week ago
I don't care what anyone says, we need to clone this guy.
ICarnag3I 1 week ago in playlist Calculus / Second Semester - Integration
those who disliked should be left to wonder the desert on bare feet while carrying three 7th edition calc books by Stewart!!! Im done with calc and i still watch these vids to refresh on integration for my differential eqns
Tobby2010 1 week ago 5
@Tobby2010 ahhahaha, you tell 'em all!! :)
patrickJMT 1 week ago 3
@Tobby2010 Totally! STEWART IS HORRIBLE!!!
patrickJMT rocks!
Thanks!
1Look2Listen3Leap 1 week ago
Thank you sooo much! You're a lifesaver! :D
phanlyna 2 weeks ago
Thanks Patrick, I have my first Calc2 exam in a couple days and your videos are making a bit more confident with the material.
Mrjammintime1 2 weeks ago
If I should have watched this video yesterday. i would have got a good score in our seatwork just lately :( how sad.. Anyway, a big credit to the owner of this video. Thumbs up for you dude!
gloryish1 3 weeks ago
Just curious what is your profession?
Skaterdude518 1 month ago
@Skaterdude518 professional napper
patrickJMT 3 weeks ago 18
If you're like me and don't remember long division of polynomials heres his video /watch?v=l6_ghhd7kwQ
logos2600 1 month ago
you explain better than my prof and make it seem less scary! thanks so much!
SpnFan04 1 month ago
Because of u am getting A's :D , thanks man !!!!
OMGDONTTELLANYONE 1 month ago
You constantly keep saving my life mann
AsmaZaghdoud 1 month ago
Why would any dislike this D:<?
IoIwhut 1 month ago
I love you Patrick. Manly love. All-nigher for exam tom. Thanks mah man.
otownfever 1 month ago 2
@otownfever good luck on the exam!
patrickJMT 1 month ago 7
you are totally going to heaven because of these videos.
mert171 1 month ago
@mert171 dont be a fag and bring religion into it
redrum41987 1 month ago
you just saved my butt man
muktipanchal 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Awesome video! very well explained!
047pob 2 months ago
Precal make up test on PFD tomorrow. You rock, man.
Wastelander1972 2 months ago
why r u soo super at explaining maths
u r only on youtube that actually does some harder problems
007abhinavagarwal 2 months ago
this was also a great alphatbet review as well
TheNumber2Pencil546 2 months ago
Thanks
far0ashgar 2 months ago
most useful math tutor ever. freaking calc teacher at ucr sucks balls at teaching
NinjaAsianMan 2 months ago
i dont understand why x^2 is not AX+C....cause its quadratic @ 18:06
poop832709 3 months ago
@poop832709 it is a repeated linear
patrickJMT 3 months ago
@poop832709 Plus it doesn't contain a constant. You can probaply write it as a lineair factor but you will have constants that will become 0 or 1
DrummerRF 1 month ago
@poop832709 basically its not an irreducible quadratic ( it can be factored down to linear factors)
LoLFlail 1 month ago
@poop832709 try rewriting the term as (x+0)^2
Mrjammintime1 2 weeks ago
u are freakin awesome dude!
Billabong024 4 months ago
Thanks a lot for this, you explain this much better than my uni teacher
Nixilius 4 months ago
@patrickJMT what happens, if you for example have (x+1)(x²+2x+2) in the denominator?
MeetGrady 4 months ago 6
Zx+ ...oh shit.
alexmusicgraffity 4 months ago
freeze some sperms patrick, We need more people like you (y)~~
MultiMoe91 5 months ago
คุณแสดงวิธีการทำได้ดี เข้าใจง่าย
maytineeniyom937849 5 months ago
i love you
saosinrising 5 months ago
Thank you so much for taking the time to do this. It means a lot! :)
mugipoptarts 5 months ago 2
Amazing, great video.
UnknownFPS 5 months ago
It's only fitting i post my first ever youtube comment for you. My utmost appreciation for this awesome work you do. You and your videos got me through my first semester calculus. Mature age uni student from down under. Good on ya mate!!
lfcforever 6 months ago 18
@lfcforever glad they help! : )
patrickJMT 5 months ago 2
Thanks for the time you put into these Patrick
europeanbamf 6 months ago
life saver!
geraldnlang 6 months ago
great work ..thanks for sharing....
geologist64 7 months ago
Thanks for taking the time to do these.
padraiga 7 months ago
patrickJMT is the greek god of clarity
myashins 7 months ago
I appreciate your existence and the time you take to make these videos.
hicelina 8 months ago 6
THANK YOU SO MUCH! I learn more from watching one of your videos than I do sitting for an hour and a half in class!!!
An1m3myL1F3 8 months ago 3
Ive been getting 90s in my calculus class all through out this year through you help, thank you so much :)
sakif7 9 months ago
im just wondering what if the denominator is not perfectly factor-able, and leaves a remainder? can you still use this partial fraction thing to solve it?
appreciate it
Beijing4Life 9 months ago
two months later.... aced that calc final and aced the class. getting ready to go into multivariable calc.
jw111892 9 months ago
"Definitely not going to do this in one video"
*does it in one video*
Battlefield2Pilot 9 months ago 5
mkay?
kyledude120 9 months ago
this is easy
- white student, high school sofemore
WhiteMamba51 10 months ago
@WhiteMamba51 Wow...I can't seem to decide if it's because you're a 'sofemore' or a 'white student' - jackass.
bobyoco 10 months ago 2
@bobyoco probably both are the reason he's a douche :P
EricfromWV 9 months ago
this is easy
- white student, sofemore
WhiteMamba51 10 months ago
@WhiteMamba51 if its easy why are you wasting your time watching it
VictoriasSecret27 9 months ago
I would not have been able to pass my university CALCULUS I & II class if it wasnt for u!!
asifbliss 10 months ago 3
whats with these commercial that come up in the middle of teaching!!!
neelo4 11 months ago 2
@neelo4 stop complaining. it keeps the videos free
speeron 10 months ago
You are my god, and the only reason I'm not failing. My teacher is the worst I've ever had. We started with 20 now have 7, and half of those 7 are failing. I'm hanging on solely because of you. TYSM
postaldude4111 11 months ago
way better than my textbook and My teacher.
jji7667 11 months ago
I really do wish that my tuition went to you, opposed to some guy that doesn't know how to explain and has a monotone voice
trudal987 11 months ago
I have to write this comment, otherwise I'd feel guilty It's 1:15am ...and i have been watching and doing my homework since 1:00pm. The one thing that I love is that you make me hold on to calculus. I know that i'd be a slacker without you. I am so grateful and thankful for the knowledge you share. I will pray that you reach all your goals in life.
- Indian student.
aksmy3 11 months ago
would suck if you ran out of alphabets...
jw111892 1 year ago 55
@jw111892 it would suck to have to do a problem that long...
MEMAMIMAMA 9 months ago
@jw111892 hahahaha
AllDayRippa 9 months ago
@jw111892 Happy face X + sad face. Angry face X + confused face
BolovanX 7 months ago
@jw111892 you'd use a subscript number underneath a letter
tg8ify 2 months ago
@jw111892 u mean letters
redrum41987 1 month ago
you are the beeze knees
corzocl 1 year ago
Thank you so much!
roachey15 1 year ago
in case 3, if the denominator had x^3+4, the numerator would be Ax^2+B? am i right?
bmdoubleuu 1 year ago
@bmdoubleuu Yes you are right; b/c the "value" of the numerator is one less than the denominator...its like what he said if you had an expression to the 30th degree....each degree is built upon a "original" expression. For example X^2...this is built upon x*x...its the same concept just different scenario. Its just not practical for exams and what not...just like taking derivatives of higher degrees like taking a derivative 8 times...then again tabular integration is another thing in calc 2.xD
edwindowfindo 1 year ago
THANK YOU :D !!!!
RiceNinja16 1 year ago
you go at a perfect pace. thank you so much. :)
starfishlovesu11 1 year ago
THANK. YOU.
rachelleBOO 1 year ago
10:15 you said the first thing can be done using u substitution, but how would you substitute for the first one? Isn't that a natural log function too? ln(x+2)
Marsc0met 1 year ago
@Marsc0met yeah youre right, but i think he is just showing "basic set ups" lol and possible way to integrate
edwindowfindo 1 year ago
thanks you saved me!
worldcupkrazy 1 year ago
What if the x was not in brackets and raised to the power of 2, or written like x^2? Would the numerator become Ax+B instead of A?
darn111 1 year ago
@darn111 No.
muffinmonster15 1 year ago
I hate Partial Fractions! I never could get the coefficients or know how to break up the thing in the first place. These vids are a major help. Thank you! <3 <3 <3
RobStephfanfver 1 year ago
If yer so smart how come you need to be educated by dumb Americans? eets crazy , no?
mingonuts 1 year ago
left handed people were never intended to write because they are the devils children and could never write anything nice
mingonuts 1 year ago 4
who wouldve thought that a geek could be so smart... keep up the good work patrick
defendurrootz 1 year ago
The exponent can never by 30, because there are only 26 letters in the English language.
This is why people in foreign countries are better than us at math, because they are not limited by a 26-letter alphabet.
Hackiesacker007 1 year ago
@Hackiesacker007 actually you could have up to the 52nd because there is both uppercase and lowercase letters. and thats not why people in foreign countries are better than us at math. their number systems are more logical, and most countries attend school for much longer each day and less vacations.
0Valkyr0 1 year ago
@0Valkyr0 Everything is your response is true.
I was only kdding lol.
Hackiesacker007 1 year ago
@0Valkyr0 it's crazy... in macedonia they learn OUR 9th grade algebra in THEIR 6th grade. And they have just 5 hour school days. Over there they are unbelievably loaded with work, but the sad thing is, in that country they cant put their smarts to much use because their higher education system sucks so they try to come to america. however, they cant get into universities here because some usa uni's see that the uni system in southern europe sucks, so they think the rest of it does too :(
drionshk 1 year ago
@0Valkyr0 some douchebag always takes things literally
zhaze420 1 year ago
thank you for this video. I understand this much better.
4loritttt 1 year ago
Thank you <3
simon42o 1 year ago
why is (x+1)with power 1 ,2 ,3...cus it suppose be all power to 1 after it splits to 3 isnt it
davidtaidawei 1 year ago
Thank you so much, I unfortunately missed the lecture on this topic, but this is a pretty good alternative. You're a saint.
Spazzmckiwi 1 year ago
dude thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you now i can do my algebra assignment :D more power
shin1300 1 year ago
would it be best to find its derivative and then find the integral
infinatycount1 1 year ago
gosh thank you! your videos are way better than long hours of lecture
MiggyCon 1 year ago
thank you so much for this! I missed the lecture because I had AP testing, and I havea test on this next week.
annieluvdogs 1 year ago
for the example 3x+1/(x+1)^3(x) : Bx cx+d.. right? if there is one less degree?
Djole0 1 year ago
The problem is, when one is writing an invigilated test/exam...in which a partial fraction decomposition is only a side problem, of a problem...one does not have the luxury to sit back and go through the above procedure. Furthermore, the above procedure may be found in any of the plethora of calculus/mathematical methods books.
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
@LeconsdAnalyse please enlighten us with an easier alternative
oOOpIIIqOOo 1 year ago
@oOOpIIIqOOo ...I have already posted in my channel`s comments section, about two weeks ago, a more efficient method. I used it to show the missing detail in a problem taken from "Practical Quantum Mechanics" by Siegfried Fluegge. Maybe tomorrow i`ll post an example, or two in my channel.
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
@LeconsdAnalyse ps sehr geiles video über quantenphysik hast du in deinem kanal! wirklich toll!
oOOpIIIqOOo 1 year ago
@oOOpIIIqOOo ..Vielen Dank!
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
i have a question, when you're adding the numerator variable in(a,b,c,d) you said one degree less...what do you mean by that?
thagiven1 2 years ago
I love the video but learn how to not talk directly into the microphone u hurt my ears
moorewt 2 years ago
@moorewt or you could learn to turn down your speakers.
hippomatron 2 years ago
what is the integral of xarctanx dx ?
crystalshayblack 2 years ago
@crystalshayblack i dont believe there is one. i know there is a derivative of it, but dont think there is an integral. i could be mistaken though.
kicker2666 2 years ago
i wish i had a teacher like you for Ext.2 maths in Australia, makes soo much more sense
Rohan233 2 years ago 2
I Love You!!!
snapshots69 2 years ago 3
You are...awesome!!!
pissedoffdude1 2 years ago
whoops, meant that @ patrick, hehe.
pissedoffdude1 2 years ago
oraleee ps ps ps mejor la tabla del uno esa si me la se jejeje
alex267441 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No es por nada, pero estos tíos explican 1000 veces mejor que los profesores de la Universidad!
Metalmasterxxx 2 years ago 32
@Metalmasterxxx la verdad que si!v:D
carolina1bernardina 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how would you this question 2/x^2-9+3/x^2-4x+3
Dem0nKlng 2 years ago
heaps of help cheers mate
jwsg90 2 years ago
lol im learning the entire precal course in two days
hirohamaman 2 years ago 4
Subscribed!
Shrubbs 2 years ago
left handed people should write backwards
debit256 2 years ago 82
@debit256 Then should right handers write backwards in Arabic?
SilverstoneSarah 1 year ago
@debit256 yes left handed people should write backwords. which would require them to think backwords. . . weird shit.
heyshutupyou 1 year ago
@debit256 !taht ot esneffo ekat I dna ,dednah tfel m'I !YEH
BrunoSoundFL 1 year ago
@debit256 That's what integration is!
gluemanred 1 year ago
shouldnt you have a bx on top of the x^2 since its a quadratic factor????
badboymo86 2 years ago
it's a quadratic factor, but it doesn't have an additional term to it. if it was x ^ 2+1 then it would be bx + c. The only reason you need to put an x in there is to show that there are 2 different variables in the numerator while still remaining a true statement.
barnumeffect5 2 years ago
how do you factor x^4+1 into linear and quadratic factors?
calvinhobbesliker2 3 years ago
and no its not an error @ 18mins.
sighmeoh 3 years ago
thanks for the help! i blanked out in class when the teacher said we'll have to use long divison LOLOL. whaaaaaaat? this video helped alot!
sighmeoh 3 years ago
thanks for explaining the different cases
Boca180 3 years ago
ya i thinks he made a mistack it shold be that?????
manoj0072006 3 years ago
why don't you have to put bx over x^2? i thought since it was sqared you have to put a number in front... or is that only if it is a polynomial squared? (at like 18 min)
bsalagean 3 years ago 3