Atheist trolling at its finest! All this video proved to me is that Brock must be really scaring these guys. To attack TAA like this must mean you see him as a threat...and a big one at that. ;D
@ubermechazillatron you didn't even saw this video have ya? will you prove AHughman08 is wrong about TAA's plagiarism, ad hoc fallacies, mine quoting accusations? oh right, ya can't.
oh and btw, you're right about the scary part. Brock is a scary motherfucker.
wow, theres swording your opponent, but that was a total beheading. poor brock did he ever post again after this?. embarressed for the bloke if he did.
8. Again, you're commiting one of the fallacies HERE!! Being the gentic fallacy and ad hominem. 9. The belief of an afterlife would be an abnormality if not true, so the very belief in it DOES have something to do with it in this context. Also, youtuber users v. the REAL WORLD! And again you use attack fallacies AGAIN! 10. I dont even...*sigh* I predict these comments will be swiftly dismissed due to the fact that this wasnt meant to be a serious criticing video anyways. For shame.
5. Do I even have to say? Even if ANY of these fallacies applied to Brock, which none of them do, at least he has class and serious gravitas in his video where as you guys...*sigh* This is the best atheism has to offer? I'd hope not. 6. Again, you didnt cite examples AND you were being *ahem* what my buisness calls, being a MASSIVE jackass. 7. Actually YOU cut and pasted here, the video you cited DIDNT EVEN HAVE THAT! So you're a liar and a massive jackass.
2. Also, you made several ad hominem attacks IN THIS VIDEO! Now THATS hypocracy. 3. You cite NO examples 4. In that video Brock was citing not JUST Darwin's racist ideas, but also the racist policies and ideas of evolutionists as well as theoretical ideals that evolutionists SHOULD believe in, according to the theory itself. 5. Christianity was NOT founded by scientifically ignorant bigots, that is a clear, baseless claim of which you provide no evidence for.
Here's an idea: FIRST make your points, THAN start insulting the guy instead of vice-versa. Thats usually the giant, glowing red flag of nothign more than an attack video. As for your actually fallacies, Brock doesnt commit any. 1. He's already made several videos giving evidence for belief in God. 2. You didnt cite any specifics where he actually made attacks on people, you just gave video titles which most of the people watching WONT go to watch and confirm.
@GermanConquistador08 "evidence for belief in god" oh there's plenty of that and it doesn't require videos to prove. They didn't attack him, they ridiculed him... which from what I've seen on Brock, he kinda does to himself every time he opens his mouth. To state that Darwin was a racist is appallingly obtuse. Telling anyone that they "SHOULD" believe something is beyond obtuse. The rest of your rant was pretty dull and not worth responding to. Peace.
@Drweavil "oh there's plenty of that" - Evidence yes, what you're looking for is proof though. "They didn't attack him, they ridiculed him" - Exact same thing. "To state that Darwin was a racist is appallingly obtuse" - The man was a product of his time, to say that he didnt hold racist beliefs isnt an insult to the man, it simply shows how race was a factor in the creation of his theories. "not worth responding to" According to who? You must refute the opposition otherwise you lose, essentially
@GermanConquistador08 Even if Darwin was a racist, and I completely disagree with your assertion, does it make his theory any less valid? No. I would be confident in saying that the vast majority of people would find your rambling, emotion filled pleading quite obtuse at the very best. And I don't waste my time refuting "opposition" who have no other position than the childish obsession of the rejection of facts, because they don't like facts or it upsets their precious, pathetic faith.
@Drweavil "does it make his theory any less valid?" - No, it simply means that his theory is racially charged to a certain degree (Even if HE wasnt a racist, its still a bit racially charged) and it can and has been used to justify racist ideals. Does it make it less valid? Socially yes, scientifically no. "refuting "opposition" who have no other position than the childish obsession of the rejection of facts" -Ok right there, if it was a fact, there'd be no reason to refute but its NOT fact.
@Drweavil "because they don't like facts" -Facts make or break belief systems, why would any faith reject ALL facts? You're generalizing, very poorly I might add. The fact of the matter is, Darwinian theories AS A WHOLE have not been proven, only natural selection and the resulting speciation has been, all others have not. "or it upsets their precious, pathetic faith." -Pathetic? I'd love to hear you justify that statement on how faith is pathetic, but atheism isnt.
@GermanConquistador08 Belief in something that is demonstrably untrue and falls apart under even the most basic scrutiny is pathetic, especially when it's despite the evidence that is available to you every day, but you clearly choose to ignore.
Atheism is simply the lack of belief. I have no belief... simple as that. If you feel at a disadvantage because your faith based position is untenable, trying to group faith with Atheism is hilariously obtuse.
@Drweavil "Belief in something that is demonstrably untrue and falls apart under even the most basic scrutiny is pathetic" - I would agree 100% but if you're saying that Christianity falls under that you are proveable wrong. "Atheism is simply the lack of belief" - Which is interesting because rarely do people define themselves by what they DONT believe. Theres no social or political term anologus to atheist. Hell, even non-voters have political identities.
@GermanConquistador08 Darwin's theory of the evolution of species by means of natural selection, in every day parlance, is a fact. Or perhaps you have an alternative theory that has undergone the scientific process and has literally millions of pages of corroboration from many different scientific disciplines, coupled with predictions that came true each time it was tested? Because that's the deal, come up with an alternative theory that passes all the tests, or you're just a blowhard douche.
@Drweavil "If you feel at a disadvantage because your faith based position is untenable" -Nah, its a disadvantage because a group has never been defined by what they DONT believe except for atheism which makes it easy to fall back on that to avoid proving your own points. Its the reason why many people substitute Evolutionist for Atheist. "in every day parlance, is a fact" -I agree 100%, the basic part of the theory is correct. I wont argue that.
@Drweavil "Because that's the deal, come up with an alternative theory that passes all the tests, or you're just a blowhard douche." -Well, you're not a blowhard douche (Quite a childish term in what should be an intellectual discussion) but you're simply going off another theory that doesnt have as much evidence. What I dont agree with, and many dont, is that animals can transcend species and become essentially higher forms of life (I.E ape-like creatures to humans) That has never been proven.
@GermanConquistador08 Type into google "observed instances of speciation" and you will get a ton of websites showing evolution working and animals evolving. Christianity is exactly the same as all other religions, a fairy tale taken too seriously. If you can sit through a Hitchens dissection of christianity and still come out a believer...
The word Atheism comes from the the greek "Atheos" or "without god" and that's all there is to it. I don't think I can be much clearer than that.
@Drweavil "observed instances of speciation"" -Ok I JUST said, I believe that speciation exists, it is practially a fact. But speciation does not prove that an animal can evolve into a higher form of life unlike itself (I.E Fish-like creatures to mammals, Ape-like creatures ot humans, reptile-like creatures to land mammals etc etc.) "Christianity is exactly the same as all other religions, a fairy tale taken too seriously" -This state really does show self-imposed ignorance of the highest order.
@GermanConquistador08 Ok so you do agree with micro but not macro evolution.... which is a bit like saying you can walk to the local store but not to the next town over. It is not self-imposed to call out a fraud when it's obvious. The king has no clothes... I don't have any beliefs to defend. Atheism is the lack of belief, once again if you need to make it a position of faith in order to justify your faith based weakness then you will fail.
@Drweavil "which is a bit like saying you can walk to the local store but not to the next town over" - Seeing as how both are possbile and the only thing that is needed is time, effort and the fitness required to do so thats not really a good anology. A better one is that saying that micro evolution proves macro evolution is like saying that since you can jump over a car you can jump over a tree. Ones possible with the right conditions and the other is impossible under any circumstances.
@Drweavil First of all, "Fairy tale taken too seriously" Instantly discredits Christianity without making a SINGLE point to back up the claim. Anyone who honestly believes that other types of belief doesnt deserve to be taken seriously is ignorant, period. Any honest debater knows this. It means that the arguement is over before it begins without anything accomplished and the truth not any closer to realization. "If you can sit through a Hitchens dissection" -Hitchens is a terrible debater.
@Drweavil Hitchens isa great speakers, he just a terrible debater. He has no respect, no grace and not even any coherent counter arguements, "The word Atheism comes from the the greek "Atheos" or "without god" and that's all there is to it. I don't think I can be much clearer than that" - I never argued its definition, I argued how its used. As a crutch to prevent defending your own belief systems, like I said comparied to any other social or political or even religious title it has no simile
@GermanConquistador08 There is no debate to be had, neither about evolution nor about christianity. One is based on fact and one isn't. Life is full of choices and it's entirely up to you to choose which one you're going to stick with. Regardless of your decision, however, one will continue to be an obvious lie and one the real, actual, no shittin', honest to goodness truth.
@Drweavil Now is you can actually prove that you can jump that tree, than show it through. So far no one has been able to demonstrate macro evolution, or that micro evolution even CAN lead to macro in any possible way. "Atheism is the lack of belief" - and I keep saying that no other social or political belief system is titled based on what they DONT believe, which makes atheist a unique circumstance which is often quite frustrating.
@GermanConquistador08 Evolution does not leap, each generation produces a change and each change is a step. It takes nothing more than the reading of any religious book to sound out ridicule. Even a cursory glance can throw out the most hilarious and contradictory nonsense. I do not believe in evolution. I agree with it because I have taken the time to understand it. I also do not believe in any god because it is obvious to me that none exist. Atheism is the lack of belief, nothing more.
@Drweavil "It takes nothing more than the reading of any religious book to sound out ridicule. Even a cursory glance can throw out the most hilarious and contradictory nonsense." - Well, since you give no examples, no foundation and no good arguements to support that position, we can assume for the moment it is baseless and untrue cant we? "I agree with it [evolution] because I have taken the time to understand it"-So you'd be under the impression that its an unalienable fact?
@GermanConquistador08 I think Evolution is the best answer there is to the questions we have of "where do we come from". If someone else comes up with a different scientific theory, that passes all the tests of the scientific method, then I'm all ears. If Macro evolution is not a fact... then who owned all of the bones? And there is so much evidence of it, it laughable to me that anyone still denies it without putting up a viable and tested/able alternative.
@Drweavil "at passes all the tests of the scientific method, then I'm all ears" -Well that would be brillent, if Macro evolution had even passed all the tests of the scientific method as well. I myself dont claim to have the answer these life questions but I do have my own personal opinions. "who owned all of the bones?" -Excuse me? "laughable to me that anyone still denies it without putting up a viable and tested/able alternative" -So just because evolution is the ONLY choice, its correct?
@GermanConquistador08 You continued denial that Macro evolution hasn't passed all of the tests is really quite sad. The only distinction between micro and macro is time. We have an ever increasing fossil record showing our evolution from an ape to a man, if we didn't evolve then who owned the bones in our lineage?
I'm getting quite tired of this, you know the rules: Either come up with an alternative theory that passes all the proper tests or there is no discussion. I have better things to do.
@Drweavil "only distinction between micro and macro is time" - This is perhaps the most dishonest arguement in an atheist's arsenal. That is NOT the only difference, the differences are larger than that, FAR larger. Yes IN THEORY that SHOULD be the only difference, but it plainly isnt. You've got different very little between species but between kinds, entire genera there is organ systems, breeding systems, methods of breathing just to name a few.
@Drweavil "We have an ever increasing fossil record showing our evolution from an ape to a man" -No we dont, what we have are fossils of ever changing species, but to say that each one is a family tree linking us to them is simply speculation, theres no scientific way to know that for a fact, many of these fossils are actually more likely different variations of lemur, ape, etc. than a link to modern man. "you know the rules" -the rules that you made up it would seem.
@GermanConquistador08 I don't make the rules, Science does and if you want to play in their sandbox then you play by their rules. Period. If you haven't got an alternative theory then I refer you back to my blowhard comment. All you've done is nitpick, it's been pathetic really. Deny evolution, but your delusions won't change it. You can bark all you like at the vehicle of progress, but in the end you'll just be another barking dog, while the world moves on, leaving you behind. Have fun.
@Drweavil "I don't make the rules, Science does" -Actually no, this is not part of the scientific method, this is not part of science AT ALL. Just because something doesnt have an alternative theory doesnt mean that the unchallenged theory is correct. Was hellocentric theory true until we have copernicus? Logically your rule doesnt make sense. "You can bark all you like at the vehicle of progress" -The rule you stated before actually DOES block progress Id might say.
@Drweavil The fact of the matter is, only micro evolution is a fact, macro has not been demonstrated and as of yet has very little evidence and absolutely NO proof at the moment. " I also do not believe in any god because it is obvious to me that none exist" - I would assume so, but again I keep saying; Atheism is unique because it is the only religious worldview based on essentially NOT having a religious worldview and no other view has that outlook, wouldnt you agree?
@Drweavil "One is based on fact and one isn't" - Thats not true. Christian faith can be and has been used intellectually which makes argueing with atheists so frustrating because atheistic belief has essentially given humanity NOTHING to prove it worth as a belief system, which means atheists often have to discredit religious belief in order to make their own ideals sound plausible. "honest to goodness truth" -And you assume with any facts that your lack of belief is the truth?
@GermanConquistador08 0.5) We made our points, 1) where? 2) I think the video is specific enough 2.5) More like satire 3) gave plenty of examples 4) so the point stands 5) right...it was an example of a fallacy 6) there were examples, and good, jackass is what I was goin for 7) Right...again, we were giving an example of the same fallacy he commits. Glad you think so, that was our point exactly. 8) I'm well aware we were committing fallacies. That was literally the entire point of the video.
@AHughman08 "We made our points" -No, you didnt actually. First thing you siad FIRST thing was an insult you scoff and sneered when starting your explaination showing your contempt which is like I said a glowing red flag that you really dont care about the facts, you just wanted to insult the man. And you even admit "we never bring ourselves to take your videos seriously." I'm sorry but if you feel this way, you should either grow up and NOT make videos or admit you're just making fun of the guy
@AHughman08 1. The videos "Atheist knows God exists." "The Atheist padded cell" Theres a couple others but those are just two. Now I'll be the first to admit, hes not the greatest apologist when it comes to bringing the science to the table thats not his specialty and its certainly not what he claims to be his image. Hes more on the social and political implications of Christianity and atheism and thats clear from all of his videos. 2. Well it wasnt, sorry you cant figure that out.
@AHughman08 "More like satire" -Satire would be if you were so overtly aggressive BUT incompetent in your presentation that it would be clear to anyone that you didnt believe what you were saying. No, its not satire its just straight up immaturity. 3. ALl you did was put up the video titles. You dont cite where in the video he makes those fallacies you just put up the titles and making childish insults after them. 4. Yes but it doesnt do much for your point of contention.
@AHughman08 "right...it was an example of a fallacy" - That..doesnt even address my point so..yeah I dont have much to say on that matter. "were examples, and good, jackass is what I was goin" -But dont you find that a bit sophmoric and damning to your cause. I mean, a Chrisitan looks at this and gets a horrible impression of atheists, and any serious atheist looks at this and is horrified by the immaturity of their fellow atheists. Who are you helping by making this video? What is accomplished?
@AHughman08 7. "we were giving an example of the same fallacy he commits. Glad you think so" -See this is what I'm talking about with the cut and paste bit. Youre selectively editing this narrative. Dont you find that a bit hypocritical? Wrong even? 8. "I'm well aware we were committing fallacies. That was literally the entire point of the video." - Than why bother making the video in the first place? Again it doesnt help anyone.
@AHughman08 "It's incredible how much you don't get it" - And its amazing how much you dont answer about your own video. "Watch my follow up video, maybe that will help." - Yeah it really didnt. It was you tooting your own horn for poorly deserved reasons. One of your main points was that his lack of discussion with other youtubers somehow makes his claims less true? I dont see how that works at all, it seems to me like just a huge cop-out, personally thats how I saw it.
@AHughman08 "My horn always deserves the finest tooting." - Its at this point that I should realize I'm wasting my time with immature anti-intellectuals like yourself.
AHughman08 spent alot of time and energy attacking someone who's videos he cant take seriously......................does anyone else see the pityful irony here?
The problem with brock and so many other christians is that they look at athiests and agnostics as a problem. Why is it a problem for other people to have there own beliefs?
Christians are the ones tackling other people with their beliefs, not the other way around.
It is important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between religious belief systems and science. Science is a tool used to solve problems. Religious belief systems are stories you believe in. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems. Likewise, you don't believe in evolutionary theory, rather; you use it to solve problems. What you DON'T do is "believe" or confuse science for "truth".
Lie, Truth , wrong?? How can this be justified on a naturalist atheist worldview? Seems like you are borrowing the christian worldview to make a video against Christianity. Lol. Go use your science and bring darwin back and ask for you own! Why does someone waste there time and efforts on something that is not true and meaningless! Lastly, them flames are going to be hot!!
@chrismac1980 You have to be a truly evil person to believe someone you know absolutely nothing about will receive infinite punishment in eternal hellfire for finite actions in this blip of physical existence because you were forced to read a 2000 year old collection of stories when you were young and your mind was vunerable, then go on to taunt them about it instead of doing what your savior would do, defeating the entire purpose of your actions! Lastly, that water is going to be fucking cold!!
"When I say: Brock, your eyebrows are thicker than an Ayn Rand novel, and my reasoning for that is because your eyebrows are SHIT CRAZY THICK! I haven't really said anything." LMAO
@Gloomshrug XD yea i dont mean to stereotype but same here..and to that other fool haha a temper tantrum? cos god hasnt given me shit? i do NOT believe in god and i have a very good life i work hard for my good life i dont need a god to make my life a good one
Atheists are all fakes. They believe in God but are angry because God didn't give them something they thought they deserved. So they throw a temper tantrum and go around claiming He doesn't exist. They're all a bunch of crybabies.
@AtheistSpanker We atheists at least give you the benefit or the doubt, or the respect, that you are an honest person who sincerely believes what you profess, even if we find your your religion a misanthropic servile and solipsistic series of contradictions.
The very least you could do is likewise grant us the same humble honor.
Disagree with what is stated all you like, but don't do your religious peers the insult of the hubris of claiming insight into our minds and motives.
2. A bad one at that. Do you REALLY think that someone who KNEW god exists would think that they could avoid judgment and eternal damnation merely by claiming nonbelief? That is one of the most moronic assertions you idiot theists make.
I can assure you with 100% certainty that we're as far from "fake" as you can get.
There is no god. Not even yours.
Think about the implications before you post more inanities.
I can assure you that if I knew with certainty that a god existed, and that he wanted me to worship him in a certain way, and if the punishment for noncompliance was an eternity of torment. I would be right on board.
However, none of that is true. There is no god. No soul. No afterlife. No heaven. No hell. No judgment. No nothing. Just quiet decomposition
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What you want God to be and how you want Him to prove Himself just simply isn't the way it is. This frustrates you to no end so you throw a temper tantrum with God because He won't fall in line with your way of thinking. You're a big baby and I see right through you. You know full well God exists but you can't handle the obvious fact that He doesn't think as foolish as you. Grow up and admit you're nothing but an impatient coward.
What part of "there is no god" do you not understand? I can't use smaller words.
And you have it completely backwards. A coward would cringe and cower and bow down to any old imaginary fiction that threatens you with an imaginary punishment.
By standing up to moron bullies like you, I think that displays the opposite of cowardice.
You who have nothing but threats and bluster. Empty. Meaningless.
@AtheistSpanker We atheists love and respect you despite your beliefs because evolution manifested you in the intelligent, eloquent form you exhibit here today. Welcome to earth - it took billions of years of accidents and coincidences to cause you to exist. You are truly blessed, for the odds were stacked against you.
@harryfmk , The odds that you're going to die are 100%. That's when you run 100% out of luck. Accidents and coincidences are terms used by those who can't count cards. A card shuffle only appears random to creatures with limited capacities. Please take logic all the way to it's final destination and don't exit the train early.
@AtheistSpanker Accidents happen all the time. It's what you call an event that happened without someone consciously willing it to happen. You are a wonderful accident. So am I. God was constructed by man as a method to rule other less intelligent men. He was created most purposefully.
brilliant. i am sure brock loved the informative video, that is designed to help him out. or maybe he's too busy licking pat robertson's dick, or ramming jesus' pooper :)
funny vid, but honest arguing with idiots just drags you down to their level, i tend to avoid it by using youtubes wonderful "block" facility, pray all they fking like...still cant msg me :)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what a hypocrite. this guy just begged the question at the end of his video. the video content was o.k. even though they seem to show a lot of hate toward Brock and feel a need to bring up his modeling career *coughs* jealous. but fallacies go both ways and atheists quote mine the bible all the time.
and talk about non sequitur, I can't see God/ I can't see FSM/pink unicorn therefore God must be FSM/pink unicorn. that sound familiar atheists?
@Jonisdaman " I can't see God/ I can't see FSM/pink unicorn therefore God must be FSM/pink"
Strawman. Sound familiar Jon? Also, quote where he "begs the question". The entire video was about why Brock fails, and the end pretty much just said how Brock fails. Begging the question? Try watching the video first.
It sounds like you don't understand how fallacies or a proper line of reason works at all actually; especially the strawman you built up in that last bit of your post. For some reason you can't tell the difference between quoting and quote mining nor a comparison where a conclusion does follow as opposed to a comparison where the conclusion does not follow because it is based on an trivial similarity.
There have been logical questions raised about the Christian God. But it would be any irony to die and meet God because you cannot exactly say then that "hey, logic rules you out."
so talkin' about someone's momma is asking to get tagged in the jaw..... pretty low of you AHugh. i think you should apologize and take this video down, or box it out.
also, i think it's funny how you attack Brock's appearance while we can see your face. are you that secure in your looks?
so talking about someone's momma is asking for a punch to the jaw. i think you should meet Brock in person and box it out.
also, i think it's funny that you make fun of his appearance while you show your face on YT.... i mean, do you really feel that secure with your looks?
Comment removed
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
Atheist trolling at its finest! All this video proved to me is that Brock must be really scaring these guys. To attack TAA like this must mean you see him as a threat...and a big one at that. ;D
ubermechazillatron 4 months ago
@ubermechazillatron you didn't even saw this video have ya? will you prove AHughman08 is wrong about TAA's plagiarism, ad hoc fallacies, mine quoting accusations? oh right, ya can't.
oh and btw, you're right about the scary part. Brock is a scary motherfucker.
ZZzzzzzWhat 4 months ago
i doubt hookers wear condoms...
MsRobotRock 7 months ago
lol, whats with these christian fundys and their make-up? they seem to like it a lot.
ZZzzzzzWhat 7 months ago
wow, theres swording your opponent, but that was a total beheading. poor brock did he ever post again after this?. embarressed for the bloke if he did.
kram83au 7 months ago
#7 was AMAZING!
MyChallengeChannel 8 months ago
Did you get permission from time warner to use their audio?
smurfboywv 9 months ago
8. Again, you're commiting one of the fallacies HERE!! Being the gentic fallacy and ad hominem. 9. The belief of an afterlife would be an abnormality if not true, so the very belief in it DOES have something to do with it in this context. Also, youtuber users v. the REAL WORLD! And again you use attack fallacies AGAIN! 10. I dont even...*sigh* I predict these comments will be swiftly dismissed due to the fact that this wasnt meant to be a serious criticing video anyways. For shame.
GermanConquistador08 9 months ago
5. Do I even have to say? Even if ANY of these fallacies applied to Brock, which none of them do, at least he has class and serious gravitas in his video where as you guys...*sigh* This is the best atheism has to offer? I'd hope not. 6. Again, you didnt cite examples AND you were being *ahem* what my buisness calls, being a MASSIVE jackass. 7. Actually YOU cut and pasted here, the video you cited DIDNT EVEN HAVE THAT! So you're a liar and a massive jackass.
GermanConquistador08 9 months ago
2. Also, you made several ad hominem attacks IN THIS VIDEO! Now THATS hypocracy. 3. You cite NO examples 4. In that video Brock was citing not JUST Darwin's racist ideas, but also the racist policies and ideas of evolutionists as well as theoretical ideals that evolutionists SHOULD believe in, according to the theory itself. 5. Christianity was NOT founded by scientifically ignorant bigots, that is a clear, baseless claim of which you provide no evidence for.
GermanConquistador08 9 months ago
Here's an idea: FIRST make your points, THAN start insulting the guy instead of vice-versa. Thats usually the giant, glowing red flag of nothign more than an attack video. As for your actually fallacies, Brock doesnt commit any. 1. He's already made several videos giving evidence for belief in God. 2. You didnt cite any specifics where he actually made attacks on people, you just gave video titles which most of the people watching WONT go to watch and confirm.
GermanConquistador08 9 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 "evidence for belief in god" oh there's plenty of that and it doesn't require videos to prove. They didn't attack him, they ridiculed him... which from what I've seen on Brock, he kinda does to himself every time he opens his mouth. To state that Darwin was a racist is appallingly obtuse. Telling anyone that they "SHOULD" believe something is beyond obtuse. The rest of your rant was pretty dull and not worth responding to. Peace.
Drweavil 5 months ago
@Drweavil "oh there's plenty of that" - Evidence yes, what you're looking for is proof though. "They didn't attack him, they ridiculed him" - Exact same thing. "To state that Darwin was a racist is appallingly obtuse" - The man was a product of his time, to say that he didnt hold racist beliefs isnt an insult to the man, it simply shows how race was a factor in the creation of his theories. "not worth responding to" According to who? You must refute the opposition otherwise you lose, essentially
GermanConquistador08 5 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 Even if Darwin was a racist, and I completely disagree with your assertion, does it make his theory any less valid? No. I would be confident in saying that the vast majority of people would find your rambling, emotion filled pleading quite obtuse at the very best. And I don't waste my time refuting "opposition" who have no other position than the childish obsession of the rejection of facts, because they don't like facts or it upsets their precious, pathetic faith.
Drweavil 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Drweavil "does it make his theory any less valid?" - No, it simply means that his theory is racially charged to a certain degree (Even if HE wasnt a racist, its still a bit racially charged) and it can and has been used to justify racist ideals. Does it make it less valid? Socially yes, scientifically no. "refuting "opposition" who have no other position than the childish obsession of the rejection of facts" -Ok right there, if it was a fact, there'd be no reason to refute but its NOT fact.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil "because they don't like facts" -Facts make or break belief systems, why would any faith reject ALL facts? You're generalizing, very poorly I might add. The fact of the matter is, Darwinian theories AS A WHOLE have not been proven, only natural selection and the resulting speciation has been, all others have not. "or it upsets their precious, pathetic faith." -Pathetic? I'd love to hear you justify that statement on how faith is pathetic, but atheism isnt.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 Belief in something that is demonstrably untrue and falls apart under even the most basic scrutiny is pathetic, especially when it's despite the evidence that is available to you every day, but you clearly choose to ignore.
Atheism is simply the lack of belief. I have no belief... simple as that. If you feel at a disadvantage because your faith based position is untenable, trying to group faith with Atheism is hilariously obtuse.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "Belief in something that is demonstrably untrue and falls apart under even the most basic scrutiny is pathetic" - I would agree 100% but if you're saying that Christianity falls under that you are proveable wrong. "Atheism is simply the lack of belief" - Which is interesting because rarely do people define themselves by what they DONT believe. Theres no social or political term anologus to atheist. Hell, even non-voters have political identities.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 Darwin's theory of the evolution of species by means of natural selection, in every day parlance, is a fact. Or perhaps you have an alternative theory that has undergone the scientific process and has literally millions of pages of corroboration from many different scientific disciplines, coupled with predictions that came true each time it was tested? Because that's the deal, come up with an alternative theory that passes all the tests, or you're just a blowhard douche.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "If you feel at a disadvantage because your faith based position is untenable" -Nah, its a disadvantage because a group has never been defined by what they DONT believe except for atheism which makes it easy to fall back on that to avoid proving your own points. Its the reason why many people substitute Evolutionist for Atheist. "in every day parlance, is a fact" -I agree 100%, the basic part of the theory is correct. I wont argue that.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil "Because that's the deal, come up with an alternative theory that passes all the tests, or you're just a blowhard douche." -Well, you're not a blowhard douche (Quite a childish term in what should be an intellectual discussion) but you're simply going off another theory that doesnt have as much evidence. What I dont agree with, and many dont, is that animals can transcend species and become essentially higher forms of life (I.E ape-like creatures to humans) That has never been proven.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 Type into google "observed instances of speciation" and you will get a ton of websites showing evolution working and animals evolving. Christianity is exactly the same as all other religions, a fairy tale taken too seriously. If you can sit through a Hitchens dissection of christianity and still come out a believer...
The word Atheism comes from the the greek "Atheos" or "without god" and that's all there is to it. I don't think I can be much clearer than that.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "observed instances of speciation"" -Ok I JUST said, I believe that speciation exists, it is practially a fact. But speciation does not prove that an animal can evolve into a higher form of life unlike itself (I.E Fish-like creatures to mammals, Ape-like creatures ot humans, reptile-like creatures to land mammals etc etc.) "Christianity is exactly the same as all other religions, a fairy tale taken too seriously" -This state really does show self-imposed ignorance of the highest order.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 Ok so you do agree with micro but not macro evolution.... which is a bit like saying you can walk to the local store but not to the next town over. It is not self-imposed to call out a fraud when it's obvious. The king has no clothes... I don't have any beliefs to defend. Atheism is the lack of belief, once again if you need to make it a position of faith in order to justify your faith based weakness then you will fail.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "which is a bit like saying you can walk to the local store but not to the next town over" - Seeing as how both are possbile and the only thing that is needed is time, effort and the fitness required to do so thats not really a good anology. A better one is that saying that micro evolution proves macro evolution is like saying that since you can jump over a car you can jump over a tree. Ones possible with the right conditions and the other is impossible under any circumstances.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil First of all, "Fairy tale taken too seriously" Instantly discredits Christianity without making a SINGLE point to back up the claim. Anyone who honestly believes that other types of belief doesnt deserve to be taken seriously is ignorant, period. Any honest debater knows this. It means that the arguement is over before it begins without anything accomplished and the truth not any closer to realization. "If you can sit through a Hitchens dissection" -Hitchens is a terrible debater.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil Hitchens isa great speakers, he just a terrible debater. He has no respect, no grace and not even any coherent counter arguements, "The word Atheism comes from the the greek "Atheos" or "without god" and that's all there is to it. I don't think I can be much clearer than that" - I never argued its definition, I argued how its used. As a crutch to prevent defending your own belief systems, like I said comparied to any other social or political or even religious title it has no simile
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 There is no debate to be had, neither about evolution nor about christianity. One is based on fact and one isn't. Life is full of choices and it's entirely up to you to choose which one you're going to stick with. Regardless of your decision, however, one will continue to be an obvious lie and one the real, actual, no shittin', honest to goodness truth.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil Now is you can actually prove that you can jump that tree, than show it through. So far no one has been able to demonstrate macro evolution, or that micro evolution even CAN lead to macro in any possible way. "Atheism is the lack of belief" - and I keep saying that no other social or political belief system is titled based on what they DONT believe, which makes atheist a unique circumstance which is often quite frustrating.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 Evolution does not leap, each generation produces a change and each change is a step. It takes nothing more than the reading of any religious book to sound out ridicule. Even a cursory glance can throw out the most hilarious and contradictory nonsense. I do not believe in evolution. I agree with it because I have taken the time to understand it. I also do not believe in any god because it is obvious to me that none exist. Atheism is the lack of belief, nothing more.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "It takes nothing more than the reading of any religious book to sound out ridicule. Even a cursory glance can throw out the most hilarious and contradictory nonsense." - Well, since you give no examples, no foundation and no good arguements to support that position, we can assume for the moment it is baseless and untrue cant we? "I agree with it [evolution] because I have taken the time to understand it"-So you'd be under the impression that its an unalienable fact?
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 I think Evolution is the best answer there is to the questions we have of "where do we come from". If someone else comes up with a different scientific theory, that passes all the tests of the scientific method, then I'm all ears. If Macro evolution is not a fact... then who owned all of the bones? And there is so much evidence of it, it laughable to me that anyone still denies it without putting up a viable and tested/able alternative.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "at passes all the tests of the scientific method, then I'm all ears" -Well that would be brillent, if Macro evolution had even passed all the tests of the scientific method as well. I myself dont claim to have the answer these life questions but I do have my own personal opinions. "who owned all of the bones?" -Excuse me? "laughable to me that anyone still denies it without putting up a viable and tested/able alternative" -So just because evolution is the ONLY choice, its correct?
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 You continued denial that Macro evolution hasn't passed all of the tests is really quite sad. The only distinction between micro and macro is time. We have an ever increasing fossil record showing our evolution from an ape to a man, if we didn't evolve then who owned the bones in our lineage?
I'm getting quite tired of this, you know the rules: Either come up with an alternative theory that passes all the proper tests or there is no discussion. I have better things to do.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "only distinction between micro and macro is time" - This is perhaps the most dishonest arguement in an atheist's arsenal. That is NOT the only difference, the differences are larger than that, FAR larger. Yes IN THEORY that SHOULD be the only difference, but it plainly isnt. You've got different very little between species but between kinds, entire genera there is organ systems, breeding systems, methods of breathing just to name a few.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil "We have an ever increasing fossil record showing our evolution from an ape to a man" -No we dont, what we have are fossils of ever changing species, but to say that each one is a family tree linking us to them is simply speculation, theres no scientific way to know that for a fact, many of these fossils are actually more likely different variations of lemur, ape, etc. than a link to modern man. "you know the rules" -the rules that you made up it would seem.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil How convient for you I might add. " I have better things to" - clearly.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 I don't make the rules, Science does and if you want to play in their sandbox then you play by their rules. Period. If you haven't got an alternative theory then I refer you back to my blowhard comment. All you've done is nitpick, it's been pathetic really. Deny evolution, but your delusions won't change it. You can bark all you like at the vehicle of progress, but in the end you'll just be another barking dog, while the world moves on, leaving you behind. Have fun.
Drweavil 4 months ago
@Drweavil "I don't make the rules, Science does" -Actually no, this is not part of the scientific method, this is not part of science AT ALL. Just because something doesnt have an alternative theory doesnt mean that the unchallenged theory is correct. Was hellocentric theory true until we have copernicus? Logically your rule doesnt make sense. "You can bark all you like at the vehicle of progress" -The rule you stated before actually DOES block progress Id might say.
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil The fact of the matter is, only micro evolution is a fact, macro has not been demonstrated and as of yet has very little evidence and absolutely NO proof at the moment. " I also do not believe in any god because it is obvious to me that none exist" - I would assume so, but again I keep saying; Atheism is unique because it is the only religious worldview based on essentially NOT having a religious worldview and no other view has that outlook, wouldnt you agree?
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@Drweavil "One is based on fact and one isn't" - Thats not true. Christian faith can be and has been used intellectually which makes argueing with atheists so frustrating because atheistic belief has essentially given humanity NOTHING to prove it worth as a belief system, which means atheists often have to discredit religious belief in order to make their own ideals sound plausible. "honest to goodness truth" -And you assume with any facts that your lack of belief is the truth?
GermanConquistador08 4 months ago
@GermanConquistador08 0.5) We made our points, 1) where? 2) I think the video is specific enough 2.5) More like satire 3) gave plenty of examples 4) so the point stands 5) right...it was an example of a fallacy 6) there were examples, and good, jackass is what I was goin for 7) Right...again, we were giving an example of the same fallacy he commits. Glad you think so, that was our point exactly. 8) I'm well aware we were committing fallacies. That was literally the entire point of the video.
AHughman08 1 month ago
@AHughman08 "We made our points" -No, you didnt actually. First thing you siad FIRST thing was an insult you scoff and sneered when starting your explaination showing your contempt which is like I said a glowing red flag that you really dont care about the facts, you just wanted to insult the man. And you even admit "we never bring ourselves to take your videos seriously." I'm sorry but if you feel this way, you should either grow up and NOT make videos or admit you're just making fun of the guy
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
@AHughman08 1. The videos "Atheist knows God exists." "The Atheist padded cell" Theres a couple others but those are just two. Now I'll be the first to admit, hes not the greatest apologist when it comes to bringing the science to the table thats not his specialty and its certainly not what he claims to be his image. Hes more on the social and political implications of Christianity and atheism and thats clear from all of his videos. 2. Well it wasnt, sorry you cant figure that out.
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
@AHughman08 "More like satire" -Satire would be if you were so overtly aggressive BUT incompetent in your presentation that it would be clear to anyone that you didnt believe what you were saying. No, its not satire its just straight up immaturity. 3. ALl you did was put up the video titles. You dont cite where in the video he makes those fallacies you just put up the titles and making childish insults after them. 4. Yes but it doesnt do much for your point of contention.
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
@AHughman08 "right...it was an example of a fallacy" - That..doesnt even address my point so..yeah I dont have much to say on that matter. "were examples, and good, jackass is what I was goin" -But dont you find that a bit sophmoric and damning to your cause. I mean, a Chrisitan looks at this and gets a horrible impression of atheists, and any serious atheist looks at this and is horrified by the immaturity of their fellow atheists. Who are you helping by making this video? What is accomplished?
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
@AHughman08 7. "we were giving an example of the same fallacy he commits. Glad you think so" -See this is what I'm talking about with the cut and paste bit. Youre selectively editing this narrative. Dont you find that a bit hypocritical? Wrong even? 8. "I'm well aware we were committing fallacies. That was literally the entire point of the video." - Than why bother making the video in the first place? Again it doesnt help anyone.
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
@GermanConquistador08 It's incredible how much you don't get it. Watch my follow up video, maybe that will help.
AHughman08 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AHughman08 "It's incredible how much you don't get it" - And its amazing how much you dont answer about your own video. "Watch my follow up video, maybe that will help." - Yeah it really didnt. It was you tooting your own horn for poorly deserved reasons. One of your main points was that his lack of discussion with other youtubers somehow makes his claims less true? I dont see how that works at all, it seems to me like just a huge cop-out, personally thats how I saw it.
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
@GermanConquistador08 My horn always deserves the finest tooting.
AHughman08 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AHughman08 "My horn always deserves the finest tooting." - Its at this point that I should realize I'm wasting my time with immature anti-intellectuals like yourself.
GermanConquistador08 1 month ago
AHughman08 spent alot of time and energy attacking someone who's videos he cant take seriously......................does anyone else see the pityful irony here?
helpmetony 9 months ago
I love the Male model part...I laughed til it hurt!!!
jambimon 11 months ago
The problem with brock and so many other christians is that they look at athiests and agnostics as a problem. Why is it a problem for other people to have there own beliefs?
Christians are the ones tackling other people with their beliefs, not the other way around.
Iamnotabeliever 11 months ago 2
It is important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between religious belief systems and science. Science is a tool used to solve problems. Religious belief systems are stories you believe in. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems. Likewise, you don't believe in evolutionary theory, rather; you use it to solve problems. What you DON'T do is "believe" or confuse science for "truth".
blaisingm 11 months ago
atheist antidote uses lots of big words so he has to be correct. YOU CAN'T DISPROVE IT!!!!
johnnythesailorman 11 months ago
uh, winning! lol
Nicely done
MrTruthAddict 1 year ago
*You have subscribed to AHughman08*
*You have subscribed to antybu86*
TheNamelessCharacter 1 year ago 5
Comment removed
TheNamelessCharacter 1 year ago
I liked the part where you show him in his "career" as a male model. I laughed uncontrollably. Great vid.
jambimon 1 year ago
The first 2 min made me cross my legs :(
gaglamesh731 1 year ago
So much win, if it wasn't so easy to make fools out of the religious then I would send you a prize.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
Yay Introduction to logic class
SkandranonOwens 1 year ago
I wish there were more anti- Brock videos. Then again, I don't think he deserves the attention...
tdp1909 1 year ago
Lie, Truth , wrong?? How can this be justified on a naturalist atheist worldview? Seems like you are borrowing the christian worldview to make a video against Christianity. Lol. Go use your science and bring darwin back and ask for you own! Why does someone waste there time and efforts on something that is not true and meaningless! Lastly, them flames are going to be hot!!
chrismac1980 1 year ago
@chrismac1980 You have to be a truly evil person to believe someone you know absolutely nothing about will receive infinite punishment in eternal hellfire for finite actions in this blip of physical existence because you were forced to read a 2000 year old collection of stories when you were young and your mind was vunerable, then go on to taunt them about it instead of doing what your savior would do, defeating the entire purpose of your actions! Lastly, that water is going to be fucking cold!!
NCTClion1684 1 year ago
@NCTClion1684 You have made fun and rejected God free gift to mankind Jesus Christ! Not mean at all..
chrismac1980 1 year ago
HAHAHA! I love the interpretation of I LOVE GOD! haha... Religion always abuses language / words to confirm theories as fact..
DoveNiki 1 year ago
This video is EPIC!!!!
needarb 1 year ago
"When I say: Brock, your eyebrows are thicker than an Ayn Rand novel, and my reasoning for that is because your eyebrows are SHIT CRAZY THICK! I haven't really said anything." LMAO
mustsyfart2001 1 year ago
@mortuus8 or get big J more than nailed, super nailed; Mjolnirs courtesy of course XD ;)
DocStrange0123 1 year ago
4:24 Eugh...where did THAT come from?
kevlonk 1 year ago
I wish covering logical fallacies in a philosophy class was this entertaining. Great job.
alphacause 1 year ago
fucking finally. one of the greatest videos i've ever seen.
toolegit2quittttt 1 year ago
Religions have never been spread via reason. This is just one of the many infected people out there who spread it mindlessly.
TheLonelyImmortal 1 year ago
"sleeps with my wife" part gets all the lulz
ericon52168 1 year ago
@Gloomshrug XD yea i dont mean to stereotype but same here..and to that other fool haha a temper tantrum? cos god hasnt given me shit? i do NOT believe in god and i have a very good life i work hard for my good life i dont need a god to make my life a good one
Lechaton2113 1 year ago
Atheists are all fakes. They believe in God but are angry because God didn't give them something they thought they deserved. So they throw a temper tantrum and go around claiming He doesn't exist. They're all a bunch of crybabies.
AtheistSpanker 1 year ago
@AtheistSpanker We atheists at least give you the benefit or the doubt, or the respect, that you are an honest person who sincerely believes what you profess, even if we find your your religion a misanthropic servile and solipsistic series of contradictions.
The very least you could do is likewise grant us the same humble honor.
Disagree with what is stated all you like, but don't do your religious peers the insult of the hubris of claiming insight into our minds and motives.
Good day.
Floridanon407 1 year ago
@atheistspanker
1. Strawman argument.
2. A bad one at that. Do you REALLY think that someone who KNEW god exists would think that they could avoid judgment and eternal damnation merely by claiming nonbelief? That is one of the most moronic assertions you idiot theists make.
I can assure you with 100% certainty that we're as far from "fake" as you can get.
There is no god. Not even yours.
Think about the implications before you post more inanities.
middlekk 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
middick, Who are you trying to fool? You're lying through your teeth.
AtheistSpanker 1 year ago
@AtheistSpanker
I can assure you that if I knew with certainty that a god existed, and that he wanted me to worship him in a certain way, and if the punishment for noncompliance was an eternity of torment. I would be right on board.
However, none of that is true. There is no god. No soul. No afterlife. No heaven. No hell. No judgment. No nothing. Just quiet decomposition
YOU don't get to tell ME what I believe.
middlekk 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What you want God to be and how you want Him to prove Himself just simply isn't the way it is. This frustrates you to no end so you throw a temper tantrum with God because He won't fall in line with your way of thinking. You're a big baby and I see right through you. You know full well God exists but you can't handle the obvious fact that He doesn't think as foolish as you. Grow up and admit you're nothing but an impatient coward.
Your Teacher,
Flisk
AtheistSpanker 1 year ago
@AtheistSpanker
Um ... no.
What part of "there is no god" do you not understand? I can't use smaller words.
And you have it completely backwards. A coward would cringe and cower and bow down to any old imaginary fiction that threatens you with an imaginary punishment.
By standing up to moron bullies like you, I think that displays the opposite of cowardice.
You who have nothing but threats and bluster. Empty. Meaningless.
middlekk 1 year ago 31
Comment removed
middlekk 1 year ago
Comment removed
middlekk 1 year ago
@AtheistSpanker Thor is better, at least he knows how to party...
DocStrange0123 1 year ago 4
Comment removed
cguevara12 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DocStrange0123 You are one party animal if you live war.
cguevara12 1 month ago
@cguevara12 What?
DocStrange0123 1 month ago
@DocStrange0123 lol
I meant like war! Sorry. Typo.
cguevara12 1 month ago
@AtheistSpanker We atheists love and respect you despite your beliefs because evolution manifested you in the intelligent, eloquent form you exhibit here today. Welcome to earth - it took billions of years of accidents and coincidences to cause you to exist. You are truly blessed, for the odds were stacked against you.
harryfmk 1 year ago
@harryfmk , The odds that you're going to die are 100%. That's when you run 100% out of luck. Accidents and coincidences are terms used by those who can't count cards. A card shuffle only appears random to creatures with limited capacities. Please take logic all the way to it's final destination and don't exit the train early.
AtheistSpanker 1 year ago
@AtheistSpanker Accidents happen all the time. It's what you call an event that happened without someone consciously willing it to happen. You are a wonderful accident. So am I. God was constructed by man as a method to rule other less intelligent men. He was created most purposefully.
harryfmk 1 year ago
@AtheistSpanker What? I've never even prayed.
Sabohaque 1 year ago
Haha - Every Christian I've ever argued with is exactly like this.
Gloomshrub 1 year ago
This video is so full of win I don't know how all that win fit into the video size limit.
hawlybawls 2 years ago
brilliant. i am sure brock loved the informative video, that is designed to help him out. or maybe he's too busy licking pat robertson's dick, or ramming jesus' pooper :)
brownbigb 2 years ago
Comment removed
thebutler89 2 years ago
Too much win to handle without proper safety equipment.
TylerBoBylerFyler 2 years ago
"shit crazy thick"
"vigorously reaming your lord in the pooper"
love it. 2 new fav quotes
SamMcAlpin 2 years ago 32
More shit about TheStrawManAntidote
Take his musical instruments away right now
JimHisself 2 years ago
saved to my hard drive, just in case it's taken down.
mosniper831 2 years ago
ha! reaming jesus in the pooper. awesome
executehelenkeller 2 years ago
nice!
ph4rcyd3r 2 years ago
Ayn Rand novels are 'thick' in more than one way.
AudibleOpinion 2 years ago 2
...my wife...
ibstrd 2 years ago
Ya happy to mirror, great vid.
whydid666 2 years ago
Fallacy number 7s example is the best.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
such a well made video.
toolegit2quittttt 2 years ago
Whose brock?
Jaroldv127 2 years ago
"your unyielding passion for pat's throbbing member"...
i think i may love you...
IIIIFile13IIII 2 years ago
Where can I download this vid for possible mirroring?
SpyHotz404 2 years ago
funny vid, but honest arguing with idiots just drags you down to their level, i tend to avoid it by using youtubes wonderful "block" facility, pray all they fking like...still cant msg me :)
paranorma1palace 2 years ago
Hilarious and educational. You two should write for PBS.
leavesof3 2 years ago
this was fantastic... hope this mirror stays up
Nicx950 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
With no one to protect them
Put this into the youtube search engine.
If you can get to minute 6 WITHOUT crying...
I'll PERSONALLY send you 25.00 with paypal.
Seriously.
Try it.
hotmanham 2 years ago
im learnin about arguments in school
sonicjet700 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a hypocrite. this guy just begged the question at the end of his video. the video content was o.k. even though they seem to show a lot of hate toward Brock and feel a need to bring up his modeling career *coughs* jealous. but fallacies go both ways and atheists quote mine the bible all the time.
and talk about non sequitur, I can't see God/ I can't see FSM/pink unicorn therefore God must be FSM/pink unicorn. that sound familiar atheists?
Jonisdaman 2 years ago
@Jonisdaman
Are you accusing this video of employing the "beeing the question fallacy"? If so, where?
0platypus0venom0 2 years ago
@Jonisdaman " I can't see God/ I can't see FSM/pink unicorn therefore God must be FSM/pink"
Strawman. Sound familiar Jon? Also, quote where he "begs the question". The entire video was about why Brock fails, and the end pretty much just said how Brock fails. Begging the question? Try watching the video first.
joshcena33 2 years ago 2
@Jonisdaman ROFL... can't take it when your religion's nonsense gets a dose of its own medicine. We know. That's the point.
sillygames 2 years ago 4
It sounds like you don't understand how fallacies or a proper line of reason works at all actually; especially the strawman you built up in that last bit of your post. For some reason you can't tell the difference between quoting and quote mining nor a comparison where a conclusion does follow as opposed to a comparison where the conclusion does not follow because it is based on an trivial similarity.
Sloth7d 2 years ago
@Jonisdaman
you notice how in the video, hughman actually showed the context?
christians like to say "out of context" but never provide it.
no one claims god is fsm/IPU. THAT is a strawman.
pyr666 1 year ago 2
Kicking his crushed skull around like that is unseemly.
thruthem 2 years ago
Respond to reason with reason.
Respond to delusional bullshit with derision.
This video is Epic!
InternalCompass 2 years ago 2
BARFING!
Throbbing member
SHIT CRAZY THICK!
One of the best videos on youtube.
bighugejake 2 years ago
I wish this wasn't so homophobic
Atomsk359 2 years ago
i fucking love you
IdioticPlatypus 2 years ago
lol Reaming your lord in the pooper....
sonnygll 2 years ago
Hahahaha xD. That was really good.
ErixuNoOuji 2 years ago
Faved.
ghostofdayinperson 2 years ago
Brock should stick to modeling. He's hot to look at but the whole effect is ruined when he starts talking.
KraiseeDAtheist 2 years ago
That was hilarious, my favorite was the quote mining segment
sevenahm 2 years ago
His eyebrows are shit crazy thick. Lol
wonka088 2 years ago
This is one of my favorite videos ever. Thank god for you, Hughman.
VerboseVindication 2 years ago
Just as good the second time.
TheNakedAtheist 2 years ago
wow, he got fucking owned!
Takua38000 2 years ago 2
Pro.
BornInAsphodelMeadow 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so AHugh, how do you think -your- mom would feel if Brock depicted -your- mom the same way you did his?
what happened to the soft, cozy, loving "buttermilk biscuit with apple butter feel" that you so proudly boast of? now you are going after his family?
but why am i surprised, you are a young punk who can hide behind the internet. you deserve to get tagged in the jaw little buddy.
CapnnnOrdinary 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so AHugh, how do you think -your- mom would feel if Brock depicted -your- mom the same way you did his?
what happened to the soft, cozy, loving "buttermilk biscuit with apple butter feel" that you so proudly boast of? now you are going after his family?
but why am i surprised, you are a young punk who can hide behind the internet. you deserve to get tagged in the jaw little buddy.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
@CapnnOrdinary The your mama joke is an accepted cultural meme. I've even seen pastors get into your mama joke offs.
ratholin 2 years ago 2
so the universe came from his mother's vagina? this all makes sense now
viperstrike0 2 years ago
Fucking great!
FlyingFree333 2 years ago
brilliant! much lols
selinkyble 2 years ago
Awesome video, some excellent points and you must have loved coming up with some of the examples you used hehe!
noelplum99 2 years ago
What an act of kindness to try to help the afflicted! Bravo!
thruthem 2 years ago
I'm an atheist, and I like what you're trying to do, but why do you have to make it personal. Refute his arguments, not his mom's vagina.
stlcityboy 2 years ago
LOL. I thought it was a great video!
goddom 2 years ago
Hookers don't use condoms, at least not the one I had.
piprod01 2 years ago
brock is completely wrong, Hitler was a Catholic
PrepsAndEmosSuck 2 years ago
5 stars again . :)
QuillerBarracuda 2 years ago
w00t 666 views!
Raptors09999 2 years ago
Cool, this vid had 666 views when I tuned in.
bamboo4tameshigiri 2 years ago
666 views
GallusSapien 2 years ago
hm...modeling with that grille ?
ATHEISTIQ 2 years ago
There have been logical questions raised about the Christian God. But it would be any irony to die and meet God because you cannot exactly say then that "hey, logic rules you out."
MICHAELMEMISBACL 2 years ago
@MICHAELMEMISBACL
you CAN say "i had no reason to believe you existed"
and you would be right.
pyr666 1 year ago
Nothing wrong with shifting the burden once one side has tried to meet their burden and expects the other side to do the same.
MICHAELMEMISBACL 2 years ago
@MICHAELMEMISBACL
it is when the opposing party has no burden.
pyr666 1 year ago
Good old Brock. If it wasn't for him where would one go for a zesty dose of regurgitated third-rate apologetic arguments?
ozmoroid 2 years ago
Thicker than an Ayn Rand Novel! Shit Crazy Thick! I love it... 5 stars and Favorited...
southmcl 2 years ago
that was great 5 faved and lmafo best i seen this week.TY
CiphersSon 2 years ago
so talkin' about someone's momma is asking to get tagged in the jaw..... pretty low of you AHugh. i think you should apologize and take this video down, or box it out.
also, i think it's funny how you attack Brock's appearance while we can see your face. are you that secure in your looks?
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
so talking about someone's momma is asking for a punch to the jaw. i think you should meet Brock in person and box it out.
also, i think it's funny that you make fun of his appearance while you show your face on YT.... i mean, do you really feel that secure with your looks?
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago