Explorations of the Mind: Intuition

[Sanakreon]

Skip to 4:20 for Daniel Kahneman.

[MetalxXxMayhem]

@Sanakreon Lol. Perfect timing. ;D

[plinden]

banalities: our response can be affected by how we frame a question. You don't say.Any salesperson knows this, if not they would be fired.

If the default is x, then you will tend to x, normally. Yes, of course. Seriously.

Yes we interpret images, so to look at the sign it self may require effort. You don't say.

Associative coherence - we try to make elements fit into a coherent picture or narrative. Yes, of course that is how movie editing relies on for its success.

Is anything new here?

[plinden]

Just Banalities!

When we are trying to do two things at once its difficult if its not involving automatic systems. lol. yes that is analytical.

others insights, if we make people think about other effort requiring things, then they will be less efficient doing other things such as self-censuring. Yes, obviously, we are finite machines.

Gem: if you are made to think about vomit, then you will have a negative emotional response. lol. deep. Of course, that is how art and poetry is possible.

[plinden]

Ok you get the Nobel Price for saying that: a) Sometimes we make more conscious thinking, sometimes more automatic and effortless.

Haha! Who doesn't know that?!

Other gems: Your intuition is a product of experience. Yes that is why we call it "second nature". And yes, when we start learning something we may have to pay attention, and then it becomes intuitive. Yes, if you are 5 years old you know this. Think about piano lessons, or sports.

Other gems:

We use intuition correctly or not. lol.

[buzzin1975]

@plinden The Nobel Prize is a farce. It's basically just an award for being a fucking Jew. It's for Jews, by Jews, and of the Jews.

[TheQedqubit]

1 made in 2008 but it even relates to the wallstreet demonstrations; -now that's intuition !

2 recursive intelligence: knowing this about our methods of awareness, we can teach us to (p)re-think how to consider our observations; the intuitive associations are like parrallel computingpower, conscious thinking is sequential.

3 knowing that : learn to use/install/program unixcomputers >learn to (re)program yerself !!

4FIY our crappy intelligence NEEDS serious debugging

[springzoller55]

.this is not intuation at all !!!! this is only coming from the Subconscious

Intuation is somthing that we never had an expiriance and we dont have anything in our Subconscious that he is all redy Familiar with



[RoyManter]

@springzoller55 thats instict

[1nada1nado1]

Boring !! i need my 56:01 minutes of my life !!

[MsTrollbridge]

"...oh I meet him all over the place!" :D hilarious

[andrewweis]

I think this guy did the voice for Winnie the Pooh

[josh1492]

talking about perception not intuition...as is the guy in the video really. and yup perception can be fooled. i am a dreamer and noone seems to share my dream but at the same time I dont want to join other peoples because I think theirs look foolish...even if I am standing alone with my dream I think it is still the right one lol

[josh1492]

I don't believe that statistical models are superior to intuition...what he is really saying is that his definition of intuition is educated perception and that educated calculations are superior to educated perceptions...this is obvious and I dont really see why he must go on and on for so long to say such a simple thing

[thevisi0naryy]

@josh1492 you cant entirely define something that grows and changes. its an applyable/observable frame of mind that can be hinted at or described by terms, not restricted to

[josh1492]

@thevisi0naryy agreed. not really what I was trying to say tho I was just trying to simplify what he was saying in this lecture. Ill try it another way...He is saying that perception is flawed in that it adopts a static value and changes slowly but logic is able to calculate more precisely since it is dynamic.

[thevisi0naryy]

@josh1492 hmmm but doesnt logic grow as perception grows?

[josh1492]

@thevisi0naryy sure the more accurate your perception the more accurate your logic would be...perception meaning an automatic calculation that tells us how to react to a situation...as opposed to logic which is when we take the time to think about the situation and calculate a response.

[thevisi0naryy]

@josh1492 ohh i know what you mean. your termonology is allittle confusing

[josh1492]

@thevisi0naryy I do talk a little funny I guess lol

[LendMeYourHand]

@josh1492 But when in uncertainty, we follow the leader. Even if you are recieving the answer, others can persuade you. It could be that you lose trust in your intuition because everyone else jumped off the cliff & we feel that we dont want to be left out or be standing as the fool, so we inherently align with a collective decision when we feel uncertainty. So the math is not perceived logically as much as it is unconciously. Lets not forget that we build worlds in a our dreams. unconscious math

[1980PintoMan]

I almost quit watching after a few minutes but glad I didn't. Interesting how our minds work and like to jump to incorrect conclusions, or even answer questions that weren't asked.

[emotionalinvalid]

ok so i watch about 30 minutes more. the bat and the ball. so we all come up with ten cents for the ball. but the mad doctor is playing a game of semantics. so what has he proved by wording the silly problem in such a way that the bat is a dollar plus the ten cents, and blah blah blah we are wrong because we didn't follow the exact wording. this guy is just practicing intellectual masturbation. maybe other nobel prizes aren't worth their weight in jelly beans either

[CaneT0ad]

@emotionalinvalid It requires solving a problem in 2 variables.

bat + ball = $1.10

bat = ball + $1.00

(ball + $1) + ball = $1.10

2 * ball = $0.10

ball = $0.05

The point of this all is that there are many real life problems that you will get wrong if you DON'T FOLLOW THE EXACT WORDING.

Just ask yourself, if the ball cost $.10, then the bat must cost $1 more = $1.10.

Then just check your answer against the original statement: bat + ball = $0.10 + $1.10 = $1.20

[emotionalinvalid]

well since i am an emotional invalid(i.e. made permanent by psychiatric torture drugging for no reason other than having a nervous breakdown, not threat to self or others) i could only watch the first couple minutes. seems to me according to the good professor that intuition is really recalling learning subconsciously from our unconscious memory bank( our hard disks in brain). i thought intuition was something much more mysterious, correct action without prior knowlege or learning. whatever...

[barrybrien82]

Totally over-hyped.

[eden28s]

cccraaapppp

[IntrepidMoocher]

I gave it 01:02 mins. I have a YouTube attention sp...

[BeamSurfer]

56 hours? honestly.

[Lubziw]

Did your intuition tell you it's OK to steal other people's land and kill them and humiliate them? Israel is a criminal state and its government and army are a bunch of criminals!

[Lubziw]

Criminal asshole for serving in the criminal Israeli Army!

[RUSSKAYAG]

Every single cell in a human body has a mind portion meaning it can be controlled-by thought. Cayce said that any physical disorder is a consequence of sin. You can repair it by a positive thought and self forgiveness. Any life situation, whether in business or personal relationship keeps on repeating until a lesson is learnt. Accept that situation, walk away with love, not anger- that life program will be de-coded.

[1971SuperLead]

@RUSSKAYAG I agree with Cayce on this. The mind created the body. The body is a representation of our thoughts. The whole world is in fact a representation of our thoughts, beliefs, ideas, etc.

[TwistedLemniscate]

@1971SuperLead

But the thoughts must be derived from something concrete?

All you're doing is suggesting that what we percieve to be concrete isn't, and therefore there must be something that's concrete that we cannot perceive. THough this is possible, simplicity suggests that this is unlikely.

Of course my comment evaporates if you suggest that thoughts themselves are concrete, but I believe what we define thoughts to be is too vague to be called concrete (though the neurons are).

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate, The mind is real, but it is not of form. The mind is creative, but it can also miscreate due to freewill. Reality is abstract, but the mind has miscreated a world of form. The forms will not last, nor will our sins that miscreated them. The belief in sin miscreated the world we see. The world of form represents our sinful beliefs. We are not in the world. The world is in us. Like a dream at night, the entire universe is only in our minds, yet we believe we are in it.

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate The belief in sins create all our problems. The problems seem to be outside of us, but they are all inside of us. It's why Jesus did nothing to change the world, he only sought to change our beliefs. Just like in our nightly dreams, our beliefs create our world. What we think rises before our eyes and seems to be quite apart from our own thoughts. The dreamer has no idea he creates the world he sees, until he becomes aware he is the dreamer. To awaken from dreams takes Light.

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate The Light is Jesus. Not the Jesus the TV evangalist whack jobs preach about to collect your dollars, but the Jesus who was sent to all of us for the task of sorting out the false beliefs from our minds. As these dark beliefs in sin, guilt, death, shame, weakness, vulnerability, etc are brought to the Light they vanish before our eyes quite literally. All the worlds sin, guilt and death disappear from the world, one by one, right before our eyes. Eventually, even the world goes

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate The world goes for the world is merely based on sin, guilt and death and these things do not really exist. This seems impossible to believe while the world terrifies our senses, but nothing is impossible with Jesus. What is impossible in dreams? All it takes is a change in thought and the dream follows without resistence. Control your tongue, for words create beliefs, and beliefs create the world you see. Nothing is outside of you, yet without Jesus you are lost in nightmares

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate We are lost in a dark dream and Jesus is the Light into our dreams that makes it possible for us to wake up. The dream is based on death and guilt and those beliefs keep us seeing death and guilt. Through proper prayer and meditation we invite Jesus into our mind and therefore into our world and we allow him to replace our dark and fearful beliefs with beliefs that are Light and Lovely. The world changes instantly before our eyes everytime we humbly call for his help.

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate Each time we welcome Jesus to replace a fearful belief the world becomes more like heaven. The goal is to make the world so heavenly in your mind that we come to remember heaven again and simply walk up from the dream of worlds. There is no world. The Kingdom of Heaven is merely God the Father and His Creation which all resemble the Father...perfectly. So be careful! You are as creative as God your Father and your thoughts are very powerful. Whatever you believe, you will see.

[TwistedLemniscate]

@1971SuperLead

How exactly does it follow that there are such things as Jesus, and God if the mind is in a dream-state?

To say that our perceptions are false and then to say that these things that we know from the Bible or others' teachings are true is to suggest that we were taught of the Bible and taught by others without perceptions (which is clearly false).

I suppose one might counter that discovering Jesus, etc., is an intuition, but it is really not for anyone who has never heard.

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate God created us, yet what we are is but spirits. God also gave us freewill and so we are not prisoners to the reality God created. However, God was very smart and knew that His Reality was perfect and that anything we created would be lacking. So we can imagine we are in a world of duality , but God made sure we only dream it., otherwise we would have destroyed ourselves. God does not let his children destroy themselves, but he will allow to dream we are.

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate Nothing the eyes see is 100% true. The senses deceive us greatly. The bible is not perfect, nor anything else that is of form. What is perfect is what is inside the forms. Spiritual vision is the ability to see spirits in all form. Spirit is perfect, but is deluded while believing it is not spirit, but flesh. Jesus is the "bridge" out of dreams of form back to abstract reality. Our beliefs are what create this dream of form that we only think we see outside of ourselves.

[ReligiousSkeptic]

@1971SuperLead Are you capable of thinking and/or being intuitive? A truely intuitive person who ALSO thinks would not have to rely on a deity as much as a sensor (a person who prefers only the five senses). A thinker would not rely on emotions as much as they do thoughts (analysis of environment or themselves). Note: My statement is not meant to be taken as an argument for or against the existence of a deity, just a person's dependence on one.

[ReligiousSkeptic]

@ReligiousSkeptic Also, one could be intuitive about the environment (surroundings) or themselves (their own mind).

[1971SuperLead]

@ReligiousSkeptic Real intuition is the ability to forget everything you believe and tap into the universal mind that knows everything. I have had telepathic communications from people because I practice meditations in where I ignore all 5 senses and there by are able to hear the "sixth" sense. It is our only real sense. The 5 are crap and report only half truth's at best. Hence all the arguing going on. You hear what another person is thinking with the 6th sense. Like cells, all info is shared

[ReligiousSkeptic]

@1971SuperLead I know, and agree with what you are saying. What I meant was: (should have been more clear) What are your opinions on the subject?

[ReligiousSkeptic]

@1971Superlead Intuition is kind of like "the force" from "Star Wars". What I meant when I discussed feeling and thinking (based off of research on MBTI,Socionics and simple "intuitive" observation) is that there are people who prefer "sensing" AND thinking, "sensing" AND "feeling", intuition AND "feeling", and intuition AND "thinking. I am aware that all combinations are not equally effective.

[1971SuperLead]

@ReligiousSkeptic, Interesting. I never knew people studied this stuff. I've always been a lover of logic and reason without the senses, but in the last 20 years I have been trying to utilize intuition. It's tough because the logical mind will argue against seeking intuition. Old habits are hard to break, but if I give up trying to come up with my own answers...the answers usually come quickly. Sometimes the same minute. It feels as if they are hand delivered by a dear friend.

[1971SuperLead]

@ReligiousSkeptic, Am I intuitive? Is that the question? I'm not being too intuitive right now. lol Actually, I have been working on it for years. I think being intuitive is about giving up thinking and learning to listen instead. It's not a gut feeling however. It is an idea that pops into my mind. It can be a vision as well. I know it's not my idea or vision because it shocks me a bit. I comes out of left field and is very strong. Not only that, but they are far more brilliant than my ideas.

[1971SuperLead]

@ReligiousSkeptic To think without knowledge...is not really thinking. It is merely dreaming. Intuition is closer to thinking that reasoning with logic. He who knows has little to think about. What does the all knowing need to reason with? He simple knows all and all questions are instantaneously answered. Questions can barely be raised where knowledge is abundant.

The 5 senses are highly subjective. The reason being is that they are highly influnced by the beliefs of the mind using them.

[TwistedLemniscate]

@1971SuperLead

I believe you side-stepped this question: "How exactly does it follow that there are such things as Jesus, and God if the mind is in a dream-state?"

I suppose I can reword it: "How can you speak so surely of these things (God, creation, freewill, our false reality, God's perfection, etc.) when your understanding stems from the supposed dream."

What you seem to be impling is that the reality we live in is false, though absolutely true conclusions can be derived from it.

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate Well, ok, there's this book called A Course In Miracles, and this book is filled with the wildest information you can imagine. It says the most outlandish things ever.....but then.....it backs it up with logic and reason that is brilliant and undeniable if you have much integrity. THEN it offers the EXPERIENCES of what it claims, and those experiences are the real clinchers. The experiences start gently enough, and they could be coincidences, but they keep coming and growing!

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate continued...yes they keep coming and they are so personal, so clever, so helpful, so lovely and peaceful and you think "Wow! My luck sure has changed!", but then one day you fall on your knees and cry because you can't deny it anymore. You realize you are not alone. Jesus is there and he is making himself known to you in ways that are so unique and personal. He is the kindest and most thoughtful person you CAN'T imagine. Whatever you can imagine and then multiply it by 100.

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate continued.....and it doesn't stop there, next come the psychic experiences. Oh, and the world becomes a different place too. A place of peace and purpose and a lot more......oh ya, a lot more. So much more. I kind of miss that world, thank you for reminding me. To be in that world takes at least an hour a day of meditation...at least for me. If I meditate for 3 hours a day....well, I'm not going to comment on what will happen then.

[TwistedLemniscate]

@1971SuperLead

So you meditate, hear Jesus speak to you, and gain psychic abilities?

Easy enough to believe (sarcasm), but after some Googling, I found that one of the authors was an MK-ULTRA scientist.

So basically even if you believe your own experiences genuinely, by Okham's razor, there's still other more realistic explanations.

It was an interesting few days commenting with you though,

Cheers

[1971SuperLead]

@TwistedLemniscate, Meditation is the practice of quiting the mind. Your limit your 5 senses as much as possible, get your mind chatter down and then you practice listening to your 6th sense. The 6th sense is like an eye ball in that when you open after years of being shut it takes awile for it to adjust. As you use the 6th sense it gets sharper and louder but you have to use it often or it gets lazy and blurry again.

The author of A Course In Miracles was NOT a MK-ULTRA scientist.

[freyajean]

memory changes intuition or lack thereof

[FUNCLEJ0E]

The only problem with this lecture, is assuming first, that the brain (mind) is the sole source of thought.

Intuition is not only of the mind, but also of the heart, and the reason it is slower, is because of educational standards imposed on society / majority, that make it difficult for the heart to be understood by the brain, which is tampered with from birth into adulthood. Therefore it is a biased study based on existing conditions, and not all conditions that are possible via environments.

[STFUNOWlol]

@FUNCLEJ0E The heart? You know the heart is just a pump, right? You're basically saying "The computing in your computer isn't just done by processors, but also by the power supply." Quite wrong, sir.

[FUNCLEJ0E]

@STFUNOWlol

I don't recall giving you any authority over me, nor my being, nor how I operate, nor how I disclose myself. I made a "comment", and you render a notice of intent to call me, "wrong", which, actually, is an argument you would engage me in. However, my heart, is not a dictator, I do find it is wise to just say to you, "I am". It is written in your heart, and your being. It is not a product of "your" mind, but because you are empty, you can not rob me of mine. I am not a "sir" either

[STFUNOWlol]

@FUNCLEJ0E Alright, brah. When you say heart, what the hell do you mean? You mind? Your conscious? Your "soul"? Your heart is a pump. It pumps blood.

[FUNCLEJ0E]

@STFUNOWlol

Your brain is so sharp. So intact.

I'm glad we don't disagree.

[FUNCLEJ0E]

@STFUNOWlol

Also, if you do some research, you will find, that the heart, tho it acts as a pump, supplies the mind with more then blood. The cells that make up the heart, are the same cells that make up the brain. There is communication, between the heart and the brain, which makes up the "mind", which is addressing you, even as you are receiving it. It's reality.

At any rate, I am not ordering you around, I'm just making suggestions, that you might use one device, to discover another etc.

[ReligiousSkeptic]

@FUNCLEJ0E Can your heart analyze information. Does your heart have feelings. Your feelings and/or thoughts originate from your mind.

[FUNCLEJ0E]

@ReligiousSkeptic

It is by initiation of your heart, that you even began to ask me, / comment- yet, you ignore that moment, to conclude and attempt to tell me how I think.

It's rather amazing.

Peace.

[k9thru12]

two

words

Gravity

Waves

[vigiyoung]

bla bla bla

[returnoftheramble]

yeah, intuition develops your thoughts via emotion, which is motivation. they are woven into each thought to make the intuition. if you lose your emotions, you'll pull up the wrong references. even with, people are delusional, as are all of things not of the tree, some more than others with some having young emotion/ retarded emotion = poor moral choices. it isn't probable because it's like lateral + logical. logical is fixed reference l,w,t,h and origin ++. references: empiric observation.

[DreamsofMajesty]

scribd (dot) com/nb812

[ncmCloud]

video begins at 4:55

[roryboryalice]

@ncmCloud Thanx!

[roryboryalice]

@ncmCloud Thanx!

[FCKEVRY1]

@ncmCloud Thank you for saving me 5 minutes of what's supposed to be bedtime.

[k9thru12]

@ncmCloud

thanks

big

time

[samu141082]

it's a Simon's "bequest" investigation: bounded rationality...

[samu141082]

You don't understand that the main insights by Kahneman is that he talked about decision making and in economics and other science is always assumed fully rational agents...so it's great! simple idea but studied together with Tversky...and it's great! the difficult is to make it useful but perhaps agent-based model, neuro imaging and something else...people who seems to know all picture: why they didn't publish prospect theory and contributed to the born of behavioural economics/finance

[hbar1212]

Bogus, degrees and awards not withstanding. They don't teach intuition in the army for nothing. Professors alway show you this stuff in Psych 101 to show how bright they are, and keep you intimidated. And of course intuition is sensing the heat on the roof and calling it to your attention, it's not magic. He has set up a paper tiger. Intuition gets you out of the matrix and keeps you from being duped. He has failed to get out. The matrix rewards you for that. Teach some more mental slaves.

[hbar1212]

An educated idiot with no intuition or common sense. The dumbing down of America. If a problem requires calculation, the intuition tells you that you don't know and that it requires calculation, duh. They are asking you to guess, and that's not intuition, it's guessing. As far as pictures go, you see the beautiful woman rather than the ugly witch. i wonder why. Professional intuition is informed on it's subject. With optical illusions that takes experience with optical illusions.

[hbar1212]

If you want to know about your mind, ask it.It's you after all. I got accurate intuition by using as accurate descriptions as I could. You can easily know more than most psychiatrist who only look at it from the outside, although it sometimes asks for more information. Everyone is getting more into the cerebral cortex now, or wherever it is. It's the mind shift, predicted for 60 years now. You see the nature of truth, are better at everything, see clearer. Study helps. No meditation needed.

[xSilverPhinx]

I'm finding this talk very interesting - I had the utter misfortune of trusting an expert's intuition a short while back and it's been disasterous. This is an even wider eye-opener.

[djindox3]

so the ball costs 5 cents right?

[TruthCracker]

Becoming aware of the nature of our decision making systems we have will lead us to better appreciate the limitations of those systems (and hence the potential damange of hidden risks).

[soccom8341576]

Jesus Christ! It seems many highly intelligent people have taken a stab at this problem, like Godel and Einstein. They use it, they feel that it has to exist but cannot explain how it works.

I know all the answers are in every one of us, and I feel guilty when trying to dig up answers. I am not sure if it is moral for us to know this because it appears this is incredibly dangerous, though wonderful.

[theboombody]

My biggest problem is when I see a system that is built on intuitive principles produce a result that goes against intuition, am I supposed to trust the system that has previously been so good to me, or do I go with my intuition on the one result and consider throwing the whole system out? 0!=1 has always been a big problem for me, despite some favorable arguments that rely SOMEWHAT on intuition. The statement itself is still too counterintuitive.

[soccom8341576]

when the results goes against intuition, figure it out exactly what makes you uneasy and adjust.

You see, intuition is not a solid state oracle that never changes. When you think differently, your intuition will change too.

So when you do figure out 0!=1 in a way you like, you can change you way of thinking.

Also, don't get too caught up with the answers. It is all part of the process.

Your intuition is not from somewhere else, it is part of you.

PM me if you got further issues.

[LOLstoplying]

what you mean issues

[theboombody]

I considered attempting to come up with a system based on counter-intuitive axioms to start with, but it's harder than I thought. Things like, when you add the same numbers in a different order, you get a different sum, depending on the order you add the numbers. I've seen that property apply to other things, but not to numbers themselves. I wonder what would happen if we tried using such an idea as a starting point for a new mathematical system.

[gefftom]

get the best of both

[LOLstoplying]

feel guilty wtf.feel free to do as you want just dont harm anybody or yourself its that easy.

i dont know what the fuck these politicians thought when they created our fucked up system.

hmmm maybe it was domination over others.hää they harm others.

ohh my gosh the people that tell us what we are supossed to do are criminals.

that would mean we would have to deal with organized crime.

let me see what laws we have for organized crime.

[soccom8341576]

I feel guilty because I wander what people will do with the answers. Will it make people better or will it support evil?

Will you or I be killed with solutions found through intuition.

The people telling you what you are supposed to do are more than just criminal. They break every law in the book and more.

I don't know what the whole world was thinking when they let evil rule them.

Look up every law, not just organized crime!

[dubconor]

Thats the problem, The whole world was far to busy with the "culture" handed down to them from the powers that be, Be it sweating in the farm all day for a king of old, Or working most of your life to collect all the stuff your mind and soul never really needed in the first place. Paying rent,Tax, etc.,Going to schools to teach us how to spot difference's he's black, shes fat,skinny,ugly,beautiful,rich­,poor,tall,short,And never about how were the same, we all laugh and cry, have fears and dreams

[soccom8341576]

We really have a lot more in common than we admit. And until we admit that, we'll continue to classify people and fight each other.

[Missticklotus]

@soccom8341576 Great belief, very true.

[soccom8341576]

@Missticklotus

Our divisions tend to be imaginary more than anything else and if we all take a step back before getting into conflict, we would see how other people are just as human as we are, and want similar things, and how some of these classifications are just made up by people who are ignorant of their own humanity.

[dubconor]

==continued

And by keeping us seperated, Keeping us busy with time wasting becoming an obsession, TV becoming the home of the self made demi gods, handing down the rules and laws of this "culture" And sadly to say not untill we can trust the mindless zombie's that out culture has spit out, to start thinking for themselves, Questioning who does this all benefit, The 90% with nothing or the 10% with everything, The planet thats being raped maybe? Together we have power, 1 day maybe the answers 2.

[soccom8341576]

At the end of the day, we are still one species made from mostly common DNA code, with similar needs, weaknesses, strengths, suffering from the Human condition.

Maybe we shouldn't take ourselves and the world so seriously, and try to calm down and think about how we behave all the time. That's at least better than watching TV.

It starts with the individual.

[hnicky]

intuition seems to be a function of brain !!

[mulheron1]

The complexity of the interaction of our 5 senses can not be answered by the simplicity of a 6 th sense, to say you missed the point of this lecture is an understatement.

[kubik066]

ti jebe ty kokot stary

[KLguy133]

boring

[Malicorian]

i know how the thought process works on the highest level. its a conceptually simple, distinct process that when explained, may seem like the obvious. if i can understand how memories form intuition, and how memories can be combined into somthing novel (imagination), i will finally understand the secret of true intelligence

[Nevyle]

"i know how the thought process works on the highest level"

hahahahha, right.... a publication ?? nobel prize ? anything ??

[Malicorian]

youd think i would tell researchers who havent helped me out on the same problem? think again sport

[Nevyle]

thats what patents are for..

Or, as with any claim, you probably have some model, so should be able to make some predictions/acount for something (which you can share at will without informing on the mechanism itself)

anything...maybe a clarification on the 'highest level', whats that level exactly ??

[Malicorian]

using my idea, i predicted that somthing like thalamo cortical loops existed, which was later confirmed. i predicted that before falling asleep, people would sometimes have strange visions that can be seen as an incompatible mapping between different concepts. my ideas excellently explain why a solution may seem extremely difficult until it is reached, especially for ones that lack a preexisting analogy to base understanding off of.

[Malicorian]

when i say high level, i mean i understand the overall process of perception, recognition, memory, and sort of abstraction, but i dont know enough to understand what circuits support those processes

[Nevyle]

Then I assume it ties in perfectly with absence(epileptic) seizures ? explaining it and provding an acces point for controlled disruption ?

[Malicorian]

i dont know anything about epileptic seizures. perhaps looking into it will give some insight

[hbar1212]

@Malicorian Yeah, it is, isn't it. I got it mostly when I decided to use as accurate words I could to describe things, without bias, exaggeration, partiality, ego etc. In that place they say human can go, a sense of observing the whole mind or one part observing the rest. Also compassion and dropping negative words gets you into the right brain. So simple. I can see a pattern in complexity and i listed 40 other things I could do or see. I figured the list was long enough.

[xecut10n3r]

i feel like someone just explained the obvious to me, and after watching the video two times i feel like this guy has researched pointless crud.

example. how ppl react to disgusting words; vomit. and how we read words before we see colors. ughhh wasted of my time.

[sweetjudgements]

When you think of a friend or spouse and then you receive a phone call from them-are there variables that calculate accurately the probability of this occurence that has happened to most of us-or is there a variable that is not quantifiable between human souls-such as love and friendship?

Sababa~Rejoice~Ahava Echad~One Love!!!

[Rcmetal76]

intuition can occur variably ,sometime it is vague and hard to recognize. At least this has been my experience.

[chris3443]

Extremely interesting lecture, thank you for uploading it.

[frikkie25]

I think that there is some confusion between instinct and intuition. Instinct is explained quite easily by psychologists because it is based on past experiences. Intuition, on the other hand, has no past history to draw on.

[NerdFangs]

Source?

[Muphlon]

Carl Gustav Jung.

[hbar1212]

@frikkie25 Wrong. It has no one looking into it.

[PavelSTL]

what are you guys talking about? I thought this was a great and insightful presentation! I'm glad I didn't pay attention to your comments and decided to watch it anyway.

[PavelSTL]

it appears you don't realize that the youtube audience is not limited to a graduate class of cognitive psychology or know-it-alls like yourself. I'm sorry there was nothing new to you, but there was plenty of interesting stuff for me.

[nashaper]

sry, dont even bother to answer - i clicked randomly to verify my first impression and hit minute 15, where he says that "simple programs make better decision then judgies" - well, comon - noone could take that seriously even coming from bla-bla-bla-renowned professor.

[PavelSTL]

Yes, there are some simple statistical models that do better at predictions than experts, albeit in certain domains. Are you saying that's wrong???

BTW, Kahneman is not the only psychologist who suggests an *analogy* between the dual (limbic system / prefrontal cortex) model and Freudian id / superego. What's wrong with that? Nobody's claiming we need to apply Freudian model per se to study brain and behaviour. Cheers.

[returnoftheramble]

in randomness, dreaming is dangerous and making us special.