Everyone in this version (except Irene) looks way too old for their character, like 20 yrs older!. Fleur is supposed to be a young beauty in her late teens and this actress looks about 35 to me and sorry, rather homely. The actor that plays Jon also looks to be in his early 30's. The 2002 version has spoiled me.
@allcatslover No, despite having the same last name, they weren't married or even related. I believe Eric Porter said at the time that if she hadn't already been married, he would have proposed! Not sure if that's true or not.
Everyone in this version (except Irene) looks way too old for their character, like 20 yrs older!. Fleur is supposed to be a young beauty in her late teens and this actress looks about 35 to me and sorry, rather homely. The actor that plays Jon also looks to be in his early 30's. The 2002 version has spoiled me.
alayadeluce 7 months ago
@alayadeluce Problem is, when the drama spans 20 (or more) years, there's always to be a compromise
mdexterlilly 1 month ago
The women's makeup in this interpretation is pure 1960's it is much better in the recent version...
suzannesadiiqa 8 months ago
she was very beautiful and she was his wife, right?
allcatslover 1 year ago 3
@allcatslover No, despite having the same last name, they weren't married or even related. I believe Eric Porter said at the time that if she hadn't already been married, he would have proposed! Not sure if that's true or not.
NancyG62 1 year ago
what a moron Irene is, always hated her character
aci1970 1 year ago 25
@aci1970 I never liked her either or Jolyon for that matter even though the audience is supposed to feel sympathy for those two.
citybeat60 1 year ago 15
@aci1970 Me too. I thoroughly despised her.
aped 1 year ago 8
Pauvre Fleur ! Elle a beaucoup aime Jon. Thank you for posting this!
befreebeyourself 2 years ago