Great little presentation. It's accurate in all details, as far as I can tell, and adequately sums up why Pluto's status came into question. The guy giving the presentation is also one of the discoverers of Eris, the larger-than-Pluto object that brought the debate to a head. Eris is in large part responsible for the IAU's decision to define the word planet.
It was a shameful decision to downgrate Pluto, by those shameful so called astronomers which I hardly think they have contributed anything of imporance to Astronomy, something that wipe the shame on their guilty faces...
Pluto remains our 9th planet despite that shameful dicision...
I was dissapointed too. I do agree however that Pluto is more like the trans neptune objects. Pluto is more like the dwarf planets than like Jupiter and Earth. Personaly I think Earth is just as much different from Jupiter as Pluto is different from Earth. I also think a gas giant is more like a brown dwarf than it is like a TERASTREAL planet. I guess if we consider Pluto a full planet we would have to consider hundreds of more objects as planets. Pluto didn't go anywhere.
@Buzzlybonk why do you think it was the right one?...havent we all grew up to learn that our solar system has 9 Planets (in mater of fact 2 generations), and then someone comes out of blue and decides otherwise...that someone who could not do something of significant in Astronomy but could do a shameful one just to make a name for itself..how shame!
@KurdstanPlanetarium because it makes sense. Who cares if it was taught for two generations lol. Shit gets taught that is wrong all the time. That's what happens as we advance. Remember the earth WAS flat and WAS the center of the solar system at one time to...........yea wrong.
@KurdstanPlanetarium well how do you feel about the generation prior who were taugh there were only 8 and then someone came out of the blue and said there was a 9th? Someone always "comes out of the blue" with new information and this time the information says pluto is a kuiper belt object along with tons of others. Big deal. We've learned far more than we've lost.
@ocerg1111 for the start Pluto did not came out of the blue, but just as Neptune was predicted by Mathematical Caulculations, and a search was conducted to look for it, it took many cold,tiring & sleepless nights for Clyde Tobmbaugh to search the night sky continously till he succeeded in finding it, and was left to an 11 years child to name it Pluto the Roman God of the underworld.
then a Neil Tyson came along, could not dicover anything, he shamelesly decided to undo the work of the others
Sorry to change the subject but this is space-related.
To see a partial summary of the clear evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Once people have seen the hoax evidence, there's nothing anyone can do to make them believe we went to the moon.
Few Christ-IANS have the faith to approach who their CREATOR really was yet with their doctrinal "L-Plates" on & feeling they only have provisional licences to use their minds for nothing more than drinking spiritual milk & sucking on the Pope's dummy still...
Look at Christ as the 'YAHWEH ELOYHIM' (One Lord of all Lords) incarnating into Christ's IVF embryo to enter the human heart & offer a rescue from the "LAKE OF FIRE" which the sunspots show is due this century post supernova...
Great little presentation. It's accurate in all details, as far as I can tell, and adequately sums up why Pluto's status came into question. The guy giving the presentation is also one of the discoverers of Eris, the larger-than-Pluto object that brought the debate to a head. Eris is in large part responsible for the IAU's decision to define the word planet.
LitBolt64 6 months ago
i would have believed him if he had said the dots on the far left just between the two big galaxies. there is an obvious change in that area
TREFIVE 1 year ago
Unwatchable video due to poor quality
Buzzlybonk 1 year ago
It was a shameful decision to downgrate Pluto, by those shameful so called astronomers which I hardly think they have contributed anything of imporance to Astronomy, something that wipe the shame on their guilty faces...
Pluto remains our 9th planet despite that shameful dicision...
KurdstanPlanetarium 2 years ago
I was dissapointed too. I do agree however that Pluto is more like the trans neptune objects. Pluto is more like the dwarf planets than like Jupiter and Earth. Personaly I think Earth is just as much different from Jupiter as Pluto is different from Earth. I also think a gas giant is more like a brown dwarf than it is like a TERASTREAL planet. I guess if we consider Pluto a full planet we would have to consider hundreds of more objects as planets. Pluto didn't go anywhere.
bandet888 1 year ago 6
@KurdstanPlanetarium .-it was the right decision.
Buzzlybonk 1 year ago
@Buzzlybonk why do you think it was the right one?...havent we all grew up to learn that our solar system has 9 Planets (in mater of fact 2 generations), and then someone comes out of blue and decides otherwise...that someone who could not do something of significant in Astronomy but could do a shameful one just to make a name for itself..how shame!
KurdstanPlanetarium 1 year ago
@KurdstanPlanetarium because it makes sense. Who cares if it was taught for two generations lol. Shit gets taught that is wrong all the time. That's what happens as we advance. Remember the earth WAS flat and WAS the center of the solar system at one time to...........yea wrong.
keyrabuns69 1 year ago
@KurdstanPlanetarium well how do you feel about the generation prior who were taugh there were only 8 and then someone came out of the blue and said there was a 9th? Someone always "comes out of the blue" with new information and this time the information says pluto is a kuiper belt object along with tons of others. Big deal. We've learned far more than we've lost.
ocerg1111 7 months ago
@ocerg1111 for the start Pluto did not came out of the blue, but just as Neptune was predicted by Mathematical Caulculations, and a search was conducted to look for it, it took many cold,tiring & sleepless nights for Clyde Tobmbaugh to search the night sky continously till he succeeded in finding it, and was left to an 11 years child to name it Pluto the Roman God of the underworld.
then a Neil Tyson came along, could not dicover anything, he shamelesly decided to undo the work of the others
KurdstanPlanetarium 7 months ago
@KurdstanPlanetarium nonsense. this was a study done just as exhaustively. Times change, data gets updated and refined.
ocerg1111 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry to change the subject but this is space-related.
To see a partial summary of the clear evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Once people have seen the hoax evidence, there's nothing anyone can do to make them believe we went to the moon.
Also, do a YouTube search on "MarsFaker".
Cosmored 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Few Christ-IANS have the faith to approach who their CREATOR really was yet with their doctrinal "L-Plates" on & feeling they only have provisional licences to use their minds for nothing more than drinking spiritual milk & sucking on the Pope's dummy still...
Look at Christ as the 'YAHWEH ELOYHIM' (One Lord of all Lords) incarnating into Christ's IVF embryo to enter the human heart & offer a rescue from the "LAKE OF FIRE" which the sunspots show is due this century post supernova...
BOREDUMBAS 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Mike Brown is going to hell for killing pluto
savemgs 3 years ago
YES
TheHordesofGreenland 2 years ago
where's the rest of it?
werothegreat 3 years ago
Now there's Makemake
bennihana123 3 years ago