Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
I do advice you to change your vocal fach!
You can listen to a very nice rendition of this piece by Sara Mingardo!
Best wishes for your studies!
MisterPapageno 11 months ago
@MisterPapageno
Oh! That's great! What fach for example?
hautecontrre 11 months ago
@hautecontrre Thanks for having removed the other message that treated the technical points! Very professional and serious of yours. Hence, I close my discussion with you! Farewell
MisterPapageno 11 months ago
@MisterPapageno
I have to upset you but I DIDN'T DO this.
Your comment was marked as SPAM. Have no idea by whom. By the way it's open for reading. Just need to click on "Show". That's why I've read everything. I hope, other can do the same. And so, I say you "Thanks", althought not everything was totally clear for me.
P.S. I've finished my study. I have my public. But in any case thank you.
hautecontrre 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apart from an historical and philological consideration, I don't like this piece for:
- the harsh and sharp sound of certain notes (0:28, 0:40, 1.04; 1:20; 1:28; etc )
- not substained final notes (0:32; 0:47; 1:11; 1:19 etc)
- the guttural sound of certain vowels ( i in 0:28; i 0:54 - e 0:55; u 1:00; 1:34-35; etc )
- no thrill at 1:55, but large vibrato
- the coloratura is rude: there the sound, which is not on the breath, changes in matters of colours and position in a same bar.
MisterPapageno 11 months ago
Comment removed
MisterPapageno 11 months ago
Comment removed
MisterPapageno 11 months ago
super!
katerliller 1 year ago
Wonderful!!!!! Love this pretty high notes!
mradaChris 1 year ago