@moro1891 That's pretty silly. In many real-world applications, you can assume that the acceleration due to gravity is 10 m/s/s, and not 9.8 m/s/s. It's much simpler to work with 20 N as the presenter does here than to work with 19.6 N. Plus, it's pretty obvious that he just multiplied mass by acceleration, what else would he have done to get Fg?
Thanks for the effort to help many. :)
domek20314 4 days ago
2kg is NOT 20N. it is 19.6N. its 2x9.8 If you are rounding the aceleration due to gravity to, make that clarification.
moro1891 1 month ago
@moro1891 That's pretty silly. In many real-world applications, you can assume that the acceleration due to gravity is 10 m/s/s, and not 9.8 m/s/s. It's much simpler to work with 20 N as the presenter does here than to work with 19.6 N. Plus, it's pretty obvious that he just multiplied mass by acceleration, what else would he have done to get Fg?
DwayneHoover94 1 month ago
this man sounds so kind,and i didn't used to any tip of kindnes on my class:)
MRippedShoe 1 month ago
This guy is calling the moment torque. lol
MclovinDicks 2 months ago
@MclovinDicks same thing lol
OAlEzeO 2 months ago
Thanks sir! for friendliest explanation ever
malomgir 2 months ago
When your finding force of the pin isn't both the 20N supposed to be negative because down is negative?
Ninjaseye21 3 months ago
@Ninjaseye21 down is not always negative.
Tuillyy 3 months ago
Thank you
blkbait 3 months ago
thanks
aarmaljer 3 months ago
i like d way u explain
sipp91 3 months ago
My small negro brain can't handle the complexities of the white mans math!
MrXrepublican 6 months ago