also look at all the titles of the pages in the google search, they're all the same, some of the content of some of them are the same and the ones that are bad have a random 3 letter php file. and it looks like those sites where passing false data on what the search engine crawler was looking for, note how they all have airport%20body%20scanners%20radiation in the url. php can be used for many things on the server side.
@Colten420 and for this. it gives the search engine what its looking for. then you clicking it from google takes you to the bad site. going to it directly as if a regular user of that website would, it goes to a real news site. the attack on those websites are social engineering. trying to trick you to think you found what you're looking for then bam it takes you to a bad website. professionals running good websites would never redirect you, and google wont omit a search. without telling you
google will never not tell you they have blocked or omitted a page. and they will never redirect you when going to a page from the search. it will simply not be in the search and it will tell you at the bottom they have omitted a page from the search. and that's mostly from some kind of court order or other thing that will force them to omit the website or they will be forced to stop their business. simple as that! either its not in the search or the website that acts up is compromised.
lol you idiot... NORTON is blocking those sites because they are virus infected... HAHAHAH what a MORON. Learn to use your goddamn computer before you blame other people making yourself look like an idiot jackass in public... lol HERP DERP
@vonniihad you should of known to copy the link and enter it to really make sure google is blocking it. if it was google you would be able to copy the link and paste it and be able to get to the website. and unlike you i did a bit of research. the domain in question that's getting blocked by norton fhio22nd.com is a registered domain that is in the kneber botnet and most likely compromised the websites you clicked on. next time look at the freaking domains. i bet you have so much maleware atm!
@vonniihad you clearly did not copy and paste the urls from the google search page into your browsers url textbox. you clicked the links. if they still went to the attack page after copy and paste it means the website itself is redirecting you to fhio22nd.com. and if you know those websites was compromised why act like it was google and reply to the comments on here saying it was. also youtube was not blocking the sound. the guy was asking for you to re make the video without the music in it.
They all did! I just didn´t put them all in the video, (point was making people search for the 25 REM, but not after 11 months!)
At min 2.0 you can see clearly that the url worked without the google, I took cnn as example!
About the domains, this went from cnn to cat sites! ( cnn redirects the link to his homepage) The sound, was blocked for a while, that is why I misunderstood the comment. I agree that was stupid.
@vonniihad google would not have put a php file onto the server then have it redirect to a website that was known to have infected stuff. why would a automobile windshield tinting service have something on the site about airport radiation, or a automobile performance parts website? and that wasn't even a cnn domain at first. cnn didn't redirect to any website. as i said. google was not blocking the sites. the websites was compromised. and all the links that redirect are a php file.
@Colten420 php can get the previous url the browser was in. that's why the first link on the google search redirected to the bad site when clicked on in the google search. and it redirected to cnn when it has been directly gone to. now with that info. ALWAYS look at the domains! the first link was one domain that went to fhio22nd.com when clicked in google and to cnn.com when directly opened. domains rarely redirect you to another domain without telling you. much less two different domains.
"Safety Bracelets" for air travelers that would include personal information and would not only track the wearer but also be capable of remotely delivering a taser-like shock.
Ben Wallace, a Tory MP who was involved in a British defence firm's project to test the scanner's effect before he entered parliament, told the Independent on Sunday that the kind of low-density materials used in Christmas Day's attempted attack would not have been detected. Instead the machines were best at detecting shrapnel, heavy wax and metal but not plastics, chemicals and liquids.
also look at all the titles of the pages in the google search, they're all the same, some of the content of some of them are the same and the ones that are bad have a random 3 letter php file. and it looks like those sites where passing false data on what the search engine crawler was looking for, note how they all have airport%20body%20scanners%20radiation in the url. php can be used for many things on the server side.
Colten420 1 year ago
@Colten420 and for this. it gives the search engine what its looking for. then you clicking it from google takes you to the bad site. going to it directly as if a regular user of that website would, it goes to a real news site. the attack on those websites are social engineering. trying to trick you to think you found what you're looking for then bam it takes you to a bad website. professionals running good websites would never redirect you, and google wont omit a search. without telling you
Colten420 1 year ago
@Colten420
I noticed yes, but still I don´t remember exactly what happened.(I always enter the sites directly)
Fact is, If you use the search term "body scan airport above REM 25" today, not one php shows up.
But I agree that doesn´t proof anything, could be google could be people abusing the term, either way, it wasn´t/ isn´t Blocking.
vonniihad 1 year ago
google will never not tell you they have blocked or omitted a page. and they will never redirect you when going to a page from the search. it will simply not be in the search and it will tell you at the bottom they have omitted a page from the search. and that's mostly from some kind of court order or other thing that will force them to omit the website or they will be forced to stop their business. simple as that! either its not in the search or the website that acts up is compromised.
Colten420 1 year ago
lol you idiot... NORTON is blocking those sites because they are virus infected... HAHAHAH what a MORON. Learn to use your goddamn computer before you blame other people making yourself look like an idiot jackass in public... lol HERP DERP
tocardx 1 year ago
@tocardx
You are the prefect example of ¨" The less you know, the more you think you know"
They know how ignorant brains work, and you fall right in the trap .... fool!
Watch it again and see if you can find out "why"!
vonniihad 1 year ago
@vonniihad you should of known to copy the link and enter it to really make sure google is blocking it. if it was google you would be able to copy the link and paste it and be able to get to the website. and unlike you i did a bit of research. the domain in question that's getting blocked by norton fhio22nd.com is a registered domain that is in the kneber botnet and most likely compromised the websites you clicked on. next time look at the freaking domains. i bet you have so much maleware atm!
Colten420 1 year ago 2
@Colten420
1 That is what i did!
2 Yes... I know, and no, i don´t have any maleware!
vonniihad 1 year ago
@vonniihad you clearly did not copy and paste the urls from the google search page into your browsers url textbox. you clicked the links. if they still went to the attack page after copy and paste it means the website itself is redirecting you to fhio22nd.com. and if you know those websites was compromised why act like it was google and reply to the comments on here saying it was. also youtube was not blocking the sound. the guy was asking for you to re make the video without the music in it.
Colten420 1 year ago
@Colten420
AGAIN I DID!
CNN site worked fine without the google!!!
They all did! I just didn´t put them all in the video, (point was making people search for the 25 REM, but not after 11 months!)
At min 2.0 you can see clearly that the url worked without the google, I took cnn as example!
About the domains, this went from cnn to cat sites! ( cnn redirects the link to his homepage) The sound, was blocked for a while, that is why I misunderstood the comment. I agree that was stupid.
vonniihad 1 year ago
@vonniihad google would not have put a php file onto the server then have it redirect to a website that was known to have infected stuff. why would a automobile windshield tinting service have something on the site about airport radiation, or a automobile performance parts website? and that wasn't even a cnn domain at first. cnn didn't redirect to any website. as i said. google was not blocking the sites. the websites was compromised. and all the links that redirect are a php file.
Colten420 1 year ago
@Colten420 php can get the previous url the browser was in. that's why the first link on the google search redirected to the bad site when clicked on in the google search. and it redirected to cnn when it has been directly gone to. now with that info. ALWAYS look at the domains! the first link was one domain that went to fhio22nd.com when clicked in google and to cnn.com when directly opened. domains rarely redirect you to another domain without telling you. much less two different domains.
Colten420 1 year ago
@Colten420
I was writing a comment, but havent red all your comments yet.. so I get back later, have to run now
For now, you made me doubt a lot with the php files and since it is 11 months ago.. I dont remember well.
So for now I changed the name of the video.
vonniihad 1 year ago
I'm not surprise
josepv3 2 years ago
Watch
watch?v=7I4c8LFflNc
"Safety Bracelets" for air travelers that would include personal information and would not only track the wearer but also be capable of remotely delivering a taser-like shock.
vonniihad 2 years ago
Guardian UK
Sunday 3 January 2010
Ben Wallace, a Tory MP who was involved in a British defence firm's project to test the scanner's effect before he entered parliament, told the Independent on Sunday that the kind of low-density materials used in Christmas Day's attempted attack would not have been detected. Instead the machines were best at detecting shrapnel, heavy wax and metal but not plastics, chemicals and liquids.
vonniihad 2 years ago
THIS is what happens when you google for Body scanners Airport Radiation
Norton antivirus: a recent attempt to attack your computer was blocked.
The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.
When radiation is gone, the sites show up!
BUT. PrisonPlanet shows up WITH the word radiation, NICE :)
vonniihad 2 years ago
Nice related videos YouTube (google!)
vonniihad 2 years ago
redo this shit without the music....
ShutUpH00ker 2 years ago
@ShutUpH00ker
YouTube is blocking the sound.. please go to the link in info.
Because YES.. this video is SHIT without sound!
vonniihad 2 years ago