ah that explains everything your a moron. You have no brain your your head at all. That explains everything. So this is the poltroon that hacked my account at last I know who to report now.
@HannibaltheVictor13 more psychic activity from Hannibal the Magician. At least this guy shows his face, if not you'd be trying to blame me. Do you have any decency what so ever? Also, word to the wise. The people you are trying to impress watch my channel closely for responses, especially after the debate. When you claim I haven't made this or that video, or claim the debate was about something it's not, they know you're lying. You're fooling NO ONE. You're a useful idiot to them,.nothing more.
To say 'water boils at 100 degrees' is a relative truth. It has little to do with ethical nihilism which is basically the belief that there is no way to know why some actions might be preferable to others.
I wouldn't go so far as to call it a cult but 'efilism' is a clique on YouTube lead by inmendham with its own mantras and groupthink.
@VicSidious It is relative to the effects of atmospheric pressure and gravity acting on a particular body of water. The higher the pressure acting on a body of water is, the more energy (ie; higher temperature) is needed to boil it. The boiling point itself is not a fixed point, it is an approximation for a body of water under certain conditions. A single molecule of water does not boil.
@petermaquire I fucking knew you were going to say that. OK lets cross all the t's and dot the i's. I was of course refferring to pure water in a non-porous container at standard atmospheric pressure on the planet Earth. That was of course implicit but whatever. The thing is, that's not the argument I had with styzor. His claim was that the boiling point of water (and everything else in the universe) was entirely subjective. Not relative to its conditions, but to its observer.
@VicSidious The concept of a 'boiling point' exists entirely in the minds of human beings. It may be a more or less accurate approximation of an observed phenomina in nature, but it has no 'objective', mind-independent existance. That is not to say that you can make your kettle boil water at 50 degrees using sheer will power, just that the boiling point of water is an example of a relative truth. An absolute truth will be a condition that is true in all places at all times.
ah that explains everything your a moron. You have no brain your your head at all. That explains everything. So this is the poltroon that hacked my account at last I know who to report now.
HannibaltheVictor13 1 month ago
@HannibaltheVictor13 more psychic activity from Hannibal the Magician. At least this guy shows his face, if not you'd be trying to blame me. Do you have any decency what so ever? Also, word to the wise. The people you are trying to impress watch my channel closely for responses, especially after the debate. When you claim I haven't made this or that video, or claim the debate was about something it's not, they know you're lying. You're fooling NO ONE. You're a useful idiot to them,.nothing more.
IndifferentSky 1 month ago
@HannibaltheVictor13 So VicSidious has no brain on his head yet he was able to hack into your account? Do you know what a contradiction is?
Also provide peer review citation(s) showing that VicSidious is the hacker that supposedly hacked your account. Follow your own rules you hypocrite.
DKshad0w 1 month ago
No such thing as OBJECTIVE truth. Subjective truth exists of course.
xknowledgeisfreex 4 months ago
To say 'water boils at 100 degrees' is a relative truth. It has little to do with ethical nihilism which is basically the belief that there is no way to know why some actions might be preferable to others.
I wouldn't go so far as to call it a cult but 'efilism' is a clique on YouTube lead by inmendham with its own mantras and groupthink.
petermaquire 4 months ago
@petermaquire Are you seriously trying to argue that the boiling point of water is a relative truth?
VicSidious 4 months ago
@VicSidious It is relative to the effects of atmospheric pressure and gravity acting on a particular body of water. The higher the pressure acting on a body of water is, the more energy (ie; higher temperature) is needed to boil it. The boiling point itself is not a fixed point, it is an approximation for a body of water under certain conditions. A single molecule of water does not boil.
petermaquire 4 months ago
@petermaquire I fucking knew you were going to say that. OK lets cross all the t's and dot the i's. I was of course refferring to pure water in a non-porous container at standard atmospheric pressure on the planet Earth. That was of course implicit but whatever. The thing is, that's not the argument I had with styzor. His claim was that the boiling point of water (and everything else in the universe) was entirely subjective. Not relative to its conditions, but to its observer.
VicSidious 4 months ago
@VicSidious The concept of a 'boiling point' exists entirely in the minds of human beings. It may be a more or less accurate approximation of an observed phenomina in nature, but it has no 'objective', mind-independent existance. That is not to say that you can make your kettle boil water at 50 degrees using sheer will power, just that the boiling point of water is an example of a relative truth. An absolute truth will be a condition that is true in all places at all times.
petermaquire 4 months ago
@HeroinChurch Yes. It is.
VicSidious 4 months ago
@HeroinChurch I see. And calling me a "shit stick" with a "pea brain" is not an attack because...
VicSidious 4 months ago
Dear little boy with a sponge for a brain, I know you think you're Jean-Paul Sartre but you're actually Chris Crocker.
VicSidious 4 months ago
Absolutely right. It is just childish bumwash that gums up the gears.
gabiotta 4 months ago