I had to work 4 days to purchase this Richter´s WTC book1, taking student´s summer job in Japan in 1972. It cost 6,000 yen then. Now you can get it for only 2,000 yen, which means only 2 student-working hours. Lucky you, you can even listen to this for nothing.
Gould's WTC version is engraved in my brain, I'm having a hard time getting used to this, even though I'm a huge Richter fan, I'm thinking maybe this is not for me.
@quinto34 I know exactly, what you talking about. Same happened to me. It has taken some time. But Richter got me with the fugues at the end. For example the IV. The polyphony is somehow even 3 dimensional.
Gould and Richter are not comparible with Bach - but both are somehow very right and very good.
@christophleipzig I love the IV, too. This manifests the pure genius of Bach to write such a perfect piece where two subjects are driven through all the voices to blend in such soul-touching harmonies. The complement of this picture is Richter's interpretative genius that extracts all those nuances to the listener's ears in a way that no other mortal will ever be able to reach.
And interestingly, I similarly fill number IV of Schostakovich's op. 87 in Richter's interpretation
BVW 846, in this recording, feels as if i am walking through a snowy dream. I awake from the dream only to relize that it had snowed the night before. I walk outside and am more happy with the world then i could ever imagine.
caljack 09 er - contar contar kind person- Bach and Richter PROVE the existence of a God= [ call Him what you'd like ] - something much greater than mere mortal - and the fact that we CAN enjoy ' it'- separately on a level that surpasses description and understanding speaks volumes to our having an innate share of the God likeness within us - i'm surprised one can appreciate Bach or verdi or whomever as GG and SR and you do and yet write as you do ? curious ....
caljack 09 - assuming we agree they , Bach, Richter has great talent which was finely developed thru their own effort, where do you suppose the original talent, the ability to connect notes in the correct key for the correct instrument or the ability to interpret those notations into an absolute feast for the ear, mind and heart. Where do you suppose that talent originated? - Is it not a glimpse, a peek, at the grandeur that is beholding the face of God? - or no - how do you see it?
@pcoffey1 You've committed a logical fallacy known as begging the question. Why should the genius of Bach and Richter imply the existence of God? Why not Quetzalcoatl, Shiva, Thor, or Zeus or any deity at all? You are able to reach that conclusion only because you've implicitly assumed that God exists.
I have nothing against your religious beliefs, just the reasoning you employed. Nonetheless, I think we can both enjoy the genius of Bach and Richter, so let's just enjoy the music.
@Panzerino02 Thanks for this info. I always loved the sound of this piano, it has an unusual beautiful "ring" and singing tone ! The acoustics and the spaciousness give the music a mysterious air too :)
I had to work 4 days to purchase this Richter´s WTC book1, taking student´s summer job in Japan in 1972. It cost 6,000 yen then. Now you can get it for only 2,000 yen, which means only 2 student-working hours. Lucky you, you can even listen to this for nothing.
55253ya 1 week ago
Beyond beautiful and heart braking to listen to.
liostroramiro 2 weeks ago
Gould's WTC version is engraved in my brain, I'm having a hard time getting used to this, even though I'm a huge Richter fan, I'm thinking maybe this is not for me.
Thanks for posting though!
quinto34 1 month ago
@quinto34 I know exactly, what you talking about. Same happened to me. It has taken some time. But Richter got me with the fugues at the end. For example the IV. The polyphony is somehow even 3 dimensional.
Gould and Richter are not comparible with Bach - but both are somehow very right and very good.
christophleipzig 1 month ago
@christophleipzig I love the IV, too. This manifests the pure genius of Bach to write such a perfect piece where two subjects are driven through all the voices to blend in such soul-touching harmonies. The complement of this picture is Richter's interpretative genius that extracts all those nuances to the listener's ears in a way that no other mortal will ever be able to reach.
And interestingly, I similarly fill number IV of Schostakovich's op. 87 in Richter's interpretation
pazdziochowaty 1 week ago
It is so sad to think that such genius like him wouldn't be born ever!
iguarni 1 month ago
I think this might be the best piano recording of these pieces.
Alexjr1543 1 month ago
he recorded this on Bosendorfer
galapz 1 month ago
BVW 846, in this recording, feels as if i am walking through a snowy dream. I awake from the dream only to relize that it had snowed the night before. I walk outside and am more happy with the world then i could ever imagine.
42BassMaster42 2 months ago
caljack 09 er - contar contar kind person- Bach and Richter PROVE the existence of a God= [ call Him what you'd like ] - something much greater than mere mortal - and the fact that we CAN enjoy ' it'- separately on a level that surpasses description and understanding speaks volumes to our having an innate share of the God likeness within us - i'm surprised one can appreciate Bach or verdi or whomever as GG and SR and you do and yet write as you do ? curious ....
pcoffey1 2 months ago
@pcoffey1 How wonderful to see such a civilized discussion.
0blacone 2 months ago
@0blacone It's more civilized than the ones I've seen that have a similar nature, actually.
Alexjr1543 1 month ago
caljack 09 - assuming we agree they , Bach, Richter has great talent which was finely developed thru their own effort, where do you suppose the original talent, the ability to connect notes in the correct key for the correct instrument or the ability to interpret those notations into an absolute feast for the ear, mind and heart. Where do you suppose that talent originated? - Is it not a glimpse, a peek, at the grandeur that is beholding the face of God? - or no - how do you see it?
pcoffey1 2 months ago
@pcoffey1 You've committed a logical fallacy known as begging the question. Why should the genius of Bach and Richter imply the existence of God? Why not Quetzalcoatl, Shiva, Thor, or Zeus or any deity at all? You are able to reach that conclusion only because you've implicitly assumed that God exists.
I have nothing against your religious beliefs, just the reasoning you employed. Nonetheless, I think we can both enjoy the genius of Bach and Richter, so let's just enjoy the music.
caljack09 2 months ago
more reassurance that there is a God and He is Great!!
pcoffey1 3 months ago
@pcoffey1 No, just reassurance that Bach and Richter were great.
caljack09 3 months ago
Richter's clarity and ability to out the different voices in the fugues exceeds even Gould's. Absolutely amazing.
zugschwangelist 3 months ago
Wow! Thanks!
str3123 3 months ago
fantastic
demirelrobert 4 months ago
Man, Richter was the whole package.
fenderbender92 4 months ago
I find BWV 847 a bit too fast in the beginning, I wouldn't make sense in that tempo on a clavichord
galkinblinnax 4 months ago
What are the bottles on the table?? Who knows, may be it is the Gods' drinks
juan78980 6 months ago
@juan78980 : Sviatoslav Richter was no God.
MusicPredominates 5 months ago
Hermosa composiciòn e interpretaciòn
veeerooniicaaa 6 months ago
it's so subtle. no neurotic melodrama. wonderful.
binkymagnus 6 months ago
actually there is no melody at all but all these articulated cords would work very well as left hand accompaniment ( 1st part )
bonsema1 8 months ago
All these are recorded on Boesendorfer piano at the Schloss Klessheim near Salzburg.
Definitively, the greatest recording of the WTC in the history of the piano music.
Panzerino02 8 months ago
@Panzerino02 Thanks for this info. I always loved the sound of this piano, it has an unusual beautiful "ring" and singing tone ! The acoustics and the spaciousness give the music a mysterious air too :)
pianist007 8 months ago
Is this the same as the commercial recording issued by RCA/BMG Classics?
Uffculme1711 8 months ago
@Uffculme1711 it's the only recorded studio version, the only recorded in that date and place
FirstPublicChannel 8 months ago
Thats one of the bests recordings ever
juan78980 9 months ago
@juan78980 i think it's the top
FirstPublicChannel 9 months ago
Comment removed
juan78980 9 months ago
thanks!
barrtok 9 months ago
@barrtok you're welcome
FirstPublicChannel 9 months ago