A Cracking of the Heart

[panzer903]

did you just equate Berkly to Mars?! /laugh

[pinegrove33]

I had to drop that guy. He was telling lies about Horowitz when he should have said he knew nothing about him. Then he was lying about my views which I can't allow on my own channel. He can do what he likes on his channel though.

[WizardKing78]

90% of the books you review are written by Jews...

[pinegrove33]

I wouldn't worry about a person's religion. I'd just listen to what they say. Their religious beliefs are immaterial when it comes to political discussion unless politics is their religion. Everyone I speak highly of is someone who embraces freedom and decreased government. That's key.

[WizardKing78]

I like your videos and I'm not saying there's anything inherently bad about your choices of author. I'm simply stating that it's quite some coincedence that, what seems like, a majority of authors you quote and individuals you reference are Jews. And indeed, it seems as though a disproportionate number of people on the lib-right are Jews: Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Rand and Friedman. Is this simply coincedence?

Lenin (who was also Jewish) said that the best way to control opposition is to lead it.

[ibmsony101]

Being Jewish transcends merely a religion affiliation. It is culture and a way of thinking based on the belief in the inherent superiority of Jews and the inferiority of the gentiles and the Jews duty to control & their right to exploit them. Such Jewish attitudes are borne out of the Torah, the Talmud and a tumultuous history where they traded tit for tat with the gentiles whenever & wherever they could.

[ibmsony101]

Generally, I believe the Jewish elites despise Western Christian civilization and they are doing their earnest to destroy it. A careful examination of modern European history will show Jewish fingerprints over the revolutions and the destructive ideals that run counter to the essence of Western civilization. None of the leading American founding fathers were Jews and it shows in the honorable conduct of the revolution.

[ibmsony101]

Their leading role in the French and Bolshevist revolutions, the Spanish civil war and their crimes against the Church, the bodies and the souls of these states leaves no doubt that if even the Protocols are a forgery, the Jewish spirit of conspiring against Western civilization and their skill in rousing and herding the masses to their own slavery & ultimate destruction in the name of liberty, brotherhood and equality is evident to those who study their bloody legacy with an open mind.

[ibmsony101]

As a defender of Western civilization, you must carefully reexamine its history and attempt to uncover where the destructive influences of Marxism, Communism and Feminism came from. Even Fascism was reaction to Marxism. You must also examine the decline of the US culturally, intellectually and socially. All these destructive trends and ideas came principally from a Jewish womb.

[panzer903]

/laugh

maybe because only Jews know how to write

/laugh

just kidding.

[oc5nsli341nforce4]

Wrong, that crap statement would only be true if there were no gentiles. So zionist tread carefully in the years ahead.

[happosai27]

@WizardKing78 well there are and were good and bad jews ^^ the frankfurt school commies that came up with all the political cancers the west is suffering from were almost all jews. the bolshevist butcher lenin was one and the boss of the nkwd which was in charge of the biggest mass murder on white christians ever. karl marx himself came from a jewish family. on the other hand was einstein also a jew ^.^ jews are smart people but yea there are loads of them in the leftist movements

[mala265]

sounds like a excellent read Bernard!

[haypenny]

Okay...it needs to be 'just a war' for you to get your gun. Gotcha. So, what is the difference between this war and the wars that you are intimately acquainted with; As a soldier, or...?

There are a great many Americans who are honestly not eligible or capable to fight; And not all soldiers have seen combat, but served honorably. Is it not better to support the war effort than not?

[utubehayter]

And I said "just war".. not "just a war". Just war is a doctrine that Christian scholars developed in order to delineate ethics of waging war. Even if you are not a christian - the ethics still stand are good reference point in deciding whether one should be support a war or not.

[haypenny]

Sorry - typo. I meant to write 'a just war', not 'just a war'. So unless the cause meets a certain standard in your mind, you deem it unworthy?Convenient. I think fighting Islamo-fascism, and all fascism, is always worthy and necessary. Those who support that cause, whether with a gun or pen, should be appreciated. If you want to question Horowitz's motives, look to his writings, not lack of combat experience. You still haven't said which war you fought in, but if you have, I thank you.

[utubehayter]

Of course. I am looking at his writings and this other modern form of expression called "videos".

You should really look them up. I would have no problem with Horowitz if he was dedicating all his savings or even significant portion of his savings to war effort. But that is not what he is doing, is he? No.. instead he wants everyone else to go fight wars that he wants to continue.

On the other hand, a US soldier can be punished for speaking his mind about any war. Funny huh?

[utubehayter]

BTW, do you know what words mean? Can you define Fascism and then define Islamo-Fascism?

What I find quite ironic is that folks like Horowitz and his ilk come the closest to Fascism. Yet folks like you use the term Islamo-fascism without realizing how absurd it is. It's is a quarrel between two fascists and decent folks don't need to get involved on any side.

[haypenny]

I know that fascism is a well established term for a philosophy that elevates the State, or a Race, or a Worldview over the Individual. And that the term, Islamo-Fascism is no more 'absurd' a term than the term, Italian-Fascism. As where 'neo-con' is liberal loaded 'neo'-nomenclature and the word 'warmonger' has been co-opted by the left to mean anyone who supports America. Now that's absurd.

[utubehayter]

Hehehe! I figured you had no clue what a fascism really means. But you verified that.

At least do a google search and be capable of providing a dictionary meaning.. Even common lemmings can do that nowadays

[haypenny]

Ohh! So fascism Doesn't elevate the State, or a Race, or a Worldview over the Individual. It doesn't do that - got it. I better write to Webster's and tell them.

So - you gonna tell us what just war you fought in...? Oh, Nevermind. G'Nite.

[utubehayter]

No!.. that could be a definition of communism and nationalism as well. Quite a few so-called nationalist conservatives and liberals put nation (and god/social welfare) before individuals - does that make them fascists?

[mala265]

@ utubehayter

It is my understanding that communism means state ownership.......and fascism means state control.

With fascism the state is above all human values.

perhaps you could give us your definition of fascism?

[aynrandgirl]

In practice, ownership by the state and control by the state are the same thing.

[mala265]

I could go with that haypenny!! :))

[haypenny]

@utubehayter: Are you a soldier? When will you be deployed? Or a Warmonger? Or a 'tongue wagging coward'? If you have family in the military, do you hope they stay the course and slaughter the enemy or pull out leaving the enemy in tact and ready to regroup? If you're not eligible to join the military, do you at least feel obligated to support their strength? Is defaming supporters of the war your way of chipping in? Just go to Horowitz's Freedom Center site - review for yourself his intent.

[utubehayter]

I don't have enemies.

I understand that soldiers are prohibited from refusing to fight - punished with imprisonment etc.

I know that nothing good can come out of war.

And Horowitz and his ilk is sending soldiers who think they are defending their nation to fight the wars of Israel and the merchants of death.

Either way - Horowitz got his way. Young American soldiers are still dying in needless wars in foreign lands, their families lost loved ones and he got defenders like you.

[haypenny]

@utubehayter: So,unless you're a soldier you should voice no opinion, or show no support for the troops or the reason for their fight. If you do - you're a 'warmonger'? Even if you have family in the military? But you sitting comfortably calling Horowitz a 'warmonger' is what - patriotic? Nonsense. I think it's worse when liberals 'sit comfortably' and cast aspersions on earnest civilians who support the war, and cripple our military with political correctness, lest they be called 'warmongers'.

[darkdaej]

btw Bernard, about that last video when i used a little mirror trick with the isms, I was just teasing ;)

I temporarily forgot that sarcasm doesn't appear in print.

[pinegrove33]

We don't fight any wars for Israel. They're the only democracy in that region and if we're going to support anyone with cash--and I'm not saying that we should--it should be a democratic nation and never the Saudis. I don't favor foreign aid in general. However i do approve of Israel being our ally. Why don't you read his work for yourself?

[utubehayter]

Is that what you believe? I never said I will not read his work for myself. But I prefer to read non-commies before I read commies of any type.

[haypenny]

@utubehayter: Like any effective conservative, Horowitz endures and fights the smears of the left, which are typified in liberal mantras like 'neo-con' and 'warmonger'. A warmonger is one who invites war, or attempts to cause it - not one who supports the war effort, or promotes actually winning the war. Horowitz is also attacked by Libertarians for criticizing Ron Paul. That you haven't sought Horowitz's rebuttal of these criticisms and merely adapted the epitaphs of the left is 'troubling'.

[utubehayter]

David Horowitz is a neo-con. As much as I want to like him for being an anti-Marxist, his warmongering is inexcusable. I would never align with him politically. That you are calling him one of your favorites is troubling. Even though we can look at people's personal lives is usually not an issue, neo-cons - like some leftists are known to use personal tragedies as political tools.

[pinegrove33]

What is a neo-con? What are you trying to say with that? He is not a war monger. I agree with just about everything he's written. He's one of the few to stand up to university indoctrination in America. That God for Dave! BTW, he's in my top two favorites: Kimball and Horowitz. Read the books I mentioned. They're sensational!

[utubehayter]

As for a neo-con - these are former lefty folks who developed a strong resentment to the "left" for its failure to seize power, hence joined the "right", but brought along their tendencies of creating big govt through war and absolute control over society in the name of small govt and liberty.

In short they are "warmongering-lefties".

[pinegrove33]

No, you're 100 percent wrong. The left's "failure to seize power," had nothing to do with Horowitz's delusion. I'm very surprised your taking such a strident tone here. You know nothing about this man. If you don't know you shouldn't express an opinion. Horowitz was a leftist who came to see that leftist goals had no correlation with leftist policies. He saw through their refusal to study history and realized he was on the wrong side...so he left and joined the right one. Thank God.

[utubehayter]

I will put those books on my reading list right next to Das Kapital. Thanks for the recommendation.

[pinegrove33]

Horowitz is a free market guy. Your comparison to Das Kapital is absurd. If you don't know something read and study. Improve but don't make a fool out of yourself. Being ignorant isn't a crime but there's no reason to wear your ignorance like a red rose.

[utubehayter]

Say who is your favorite free market advocate (leaving aside Adam Smith)? Where are you getting your idea/definition of a free market?

[utubehayter]

I just thought of an apt description of a neo-con.. I think of them as War commies. They want the "takes a village" approach, when it comes to war, but not anywhere else.