@aryanlove777 Your Aryan white ass?..I'm willing to bet $1000 you have NO IDEA what a true Aryan is, tell me - what 3 countries are comprised of the only TRUE Aryans - Btw, True Aryans never have or will follow the ideals of you False Aryan wannabees, you have no idea what an Aryan is...Hitler chose the label because he thought they were all blue eyed and blond. well a few of are..but the majority are dark haired with various eye color and we come from a specific area of Indo-Europe.
@aryanlove777 Btw the way, I am Caucasian and not of Jewish descent or any nationality that has ties to the Jewish faith...so don' try to take that road with me in your answer..I am of ARYAN descent ans sick and tired of all you wannabees and your "Hitler was an Aryan BS" Hitler was from Austria and his father had a Jewish bloodline from a few generations back...now figure that one out..
what a great man i have meet him in my days 1488 brother dam the goverment sucks and the prision i was told they killed him while he was asleep fuck faces cthey cant even face him when he was alive what chups they are the they should drop dead yes i am a aryan woman and im proud bitches so drop dead asses the aryan race will live no matter how many time we die there is another that is being born we will fight till the end rip david lane
@TheVincent0909 You know, when it comes to intellectual acheivements, the indo-aryans really are superior as you and your neo-nazi buddies often say. But when it comes to things like running, agility, and flexibility, negro is superior and you whites are behind.
@lutzdify in that aspect you are correct, but when it comes to swimming, and weight lifting the aryan shines. I personally believe each race shines in one aspect over another
sure, it got a bit gross when parts of his decomposing corpse began ripping from the rest of his generally soft, decomposed body, but god damn..... he got alot of holes now.
that nigga is kinky.
I highly recommend that all fans of david lane buy a shovel and go dig him up for some sweet loving.
@TexasVignir May you please stop copying what I am saying? I know that it makes perfect sense, but when you're using my words it insults yourself, and it makes me disgusted. I don't mind someone preserving their own culture. But I mind when someone is racist, makes fun of others and stereotypes just for the fuck of it. I don't see your race declining at all, neither do I any. That's no excuse at all to discriminate, and least of all that's down right NOT moral.
@TexasVignir This is the real world. Almost everybody INCLUDING people of your kind don't agree with you. You HAVE NOTHING to prove to me other than your continuous barking of idiocy. It's kind of hilarious though, there are so many contradictions in religion, and it just shines so brightly through you. It's like you represent the fallacies in the bible and such. Thanks for that.
@TexasVignir Hmm facts. Still see nothing that you've said other than name-calling. Everything else is from your own useless little supremacist group of friends who are to afraid to face people they hate except for when they are online. And even when you guys commit "violent" acts, it's a select few that are probably the emptiest minded out of all of you. You haven't proven anything wrong. Everything you have said is because "YOU favor it". And just because you favor it you see it as correct.
@TexasVignir What does genocide have to do with faith and my moral compass? How does that relate to each other, what the fuck is wrong with you? Just because I don't believe in God doesn't mean I'm not moral. You're such a fucking twisted imbecile who's trapped in a closed mind that won't open by any means necessary. Did you know that your "supremacist groups" only occupy not even 1% of the world? Do you think that your views can set aside the other 99%? I doubt it.
@i6o4 So typical of your crowd. You believe that the truth is subject to the vote. You think that the wisdom is something that can be found by the method of voting on what wisdom is. You believe that what is right is what is popular.
@Jenab7 Of my crowd? I am my own self, fully unique and capable of thinking for myself. Nobody can ever fill or change my morality other than through my mind and heart. I believe in the right of equality, and if it may happen to be more "popular", so beat it. I also believe in the right to defend others that are being insulted/harmed for injustice reasons, which is NOT popular. Trust me, this has put a toll on my character.
@i6o4 Mind and heart, huh? Okay, then. I'll give it a try. I begin with what morality, properly understood, really is. It's a survival tool. Specifically, it is a prescription for behavior aimed at preserving the survival of its practitioner group; i.e., morality is survival above the individual level. That is why moral systems evolved among humans. It doesn't exist to give you pleasant feelings. Doing what is right can make you feel very bad.
@Jenab7 All proper moral systems put survival of the practitioner group, the continuation of its existence, in first place of value. Moral systems that do otherwise, that put anything else in first place of value, are not proper. Why survival first? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value to dead things. Because only to something alive may anything else be good.
@Jenab7 And, since what doesn't exist has no value, what can't survive isn't worth much. Moral systems that prescribe behavior that leads to the practitioner group's extinction are worth less, are inferior, compared with moral systems that prescribe behavior that keeps the practitioner group alive.
@Jenab7 The repetition of history's mistakes occurs because man repeatedly confuses sentimental humanitarianism with morality, which happens in turn because man is not, quite, intelligent enough to distinguish between what is virtue and what makes him feel virtuous. We waste our energy in a futile resistance to natural laws and bend the knee only when our means of resistance has been exhausted—at which moment our capacity for doing much of anything else has also been exhausted.
@Jenab7 For example, consider the humanitarian drive to "feed the hungry," particularly, as prevailing politics demand, in some region where the hungry are not white. What is the intent? To end hunger. What is the result? To increase the numbers of hungry people. Has the result been well-documented? Certainly. Why do some men insist on the continuance of a policy that contains obvious flaws and has obviously always failed? Because it makes them feel virtuous.
@Jenab7 Real virtue would prescribe that men do as experience shows to be wise, which means (in part) effective. But acting thus requires just a bit more intelligence than most men have. Now, which form of government most effectively drowns the signal of wisdom in the noise of mediocrity? Democracy does. Democracy might give people the pleasant feeling of being "involved," but it wastes human energy in the same way that a poorly designed engine wastes mechanical energy.
@Jenab7 I'll try to illustrate. Let us say that our job is to hire people to assemble two old-fashioned pocket watches from their parts scattered on tables. To one table, we invite 100 randomly chosen democratic voters. To the other, we invite a watch-maker. At the former table, we have the advantage of multifaceted and diverse opinion. At the latter, we merely have competence and suitability for the task at hand. At which table, then, will a watch most likely be assembled such that it works?
@Jenab7 The effective administration of a country is even more intricate than putting together a pocket watch. It is not a task for which the customers (citizens) will be well-served were it left to persons whose only recommendation is that they know how to vote. Every day, a government must make decisions that would require the most careful consideration in even the greatest minds, and yet they are, in democratic countries, made by men who lack every qualification for the task.
@Jenab7 Why did you THINK that people in democratic countries are never content? It is because they elect people who really don't know how to do the governing job well. Thomas Jefferson made only one major error of political philosophy. He believed that the common people formed a reservoir of wisdom that would help America recover its proper direction if ever it were to stray. Nonsense. The common man constitutes no such resource. You don't get expertise by summing mediocrities.
@Jenab7 Equality isn't a "right." It is a relation between two or more objects (or animals, or people). To say that two things are equals is to make the strongest possible comparison between them. To say that it would be moral to treat unequal objects as if they were equals is false. Just as you don't treat food and poison in the same way, neither should the law treat unequal people in the same way.
@Jenab7 Consistency has never been a strong suit of the political left. If race doesn't matter, then why does a company staffed entirely by white people bother anybody? Surely that arrangement of people is just as good as any other. Apparently not, in the opinion of doublethinking leftists. Now, leftists will probably come back and say that the races do differ, but only in superficial ways that have no social significance. But let's consider the plausibility of that opinion.
@Jenab7 All racial differences arose from the process of natural evolution, and evolution works the same way for humans as for any other species. While we agree with the leftists that the races differ in "cosmetic" ways, we don't think it is likely that nature was very careful to permit ONLY racial differences having no social significance of which a leftist might disapprove. For that to have happened, evolution would have had to have been a very carefully guided process, which it wasn't.
@Jenab7 It isn't even remotely possible that natural evolution neatly apportioned all racial differences to the side of social insignificance. Some are bound to be very significant indeed. And we believe we've found a few of them. The races seem to differ in the distribution of general intelligence. And we have noticed that some races are more prone to commit acts of violence and theft than other races are. Which is to say that the theory of racial equality is pure hokum.
@Jenab7 I did not realize you wrote an entire essay until now... Didn't show up on my message folder. Anyhow, to determine which ethnicity are genetically advanced are false selfish ideologies. I don't fit on the spectrum, therefore anybody assuming I'm this or that is ridiculous. In Canada the two major parties are either the Libs or the Dropout Harper leading the Cons. I'm not a fan of either, nor any other Bloc/Green/NDP.
@Jenab7 I believe genetically, geographically, there are patterns in societies that will exist. To say that the pattern will never break is a far-fetched call. I also believe the notion of "proving oneself" based on the onset of skills, determination, and work ethic. Whether or not the person is of racial difference, or even a complete asshole, I am still able to respect the person for what he/she has accomplished, setting aside any differences.
@Jenab7 I don't care whether or not there is a group entirely of white people. I always notice it when the class watches political videos (even modern parliament buildings) contain mainly white ethnic backgrounds. It only bothers me that there are people that look down on me for being born the way it happened to be. The result is me, and I will have to deal with it. It also just so happens to be that a minority of "all-white" groups tend to be openly racist.
@Jenab7 Again, who decides who is equal or unequal when it comes to a standard human being only differentiating in ethnicity? The only thing I could see possible is opinion, as stated is only a mere thought or judgment and not a fact.
@Jenab7 That's true and I can see that. It's a shame that government has made changes to lessen education funds, teaching us little-to-no in depth details about politics. To be honest I hate politics because of the way it is taught to our class, but more importantly the loopholes and corruption that has tailed along with many systems of government.
@Jenab7 Again... true. In my generation I notice that the only possible way to succeed is self-motivation. Only 20% of students in my school have an average grade about 86%, reasons because they "want" to succeed. Others are not forced, their parents don't care, and the citizens of Canada in this century have become extremely lazy/mediocre as you said. I hardly even find that we as citizens are involved in government, reasons being that not even half the population votes.
@Jenab7 I can understand this, yet I believe this should absolutely not be a justification for racism. I don't support any fundraisers or spend a dollar a day for a child because I do not see any significant change in the world if I do so. Do I feel any less moral? I question myself, but I know that the change isn't important. People will die, and the weak will die off as you said, by nature's law. Though again, I do not stand by this reason as a justification for racism.
@Jenab7 To finish this. I sincerely hope you can understand where I am coming from, being at the age of 17 and growing. In my personal system, I believe proving oneself of his/her capabilities are far greater than racial difference. That doing right things come at great costs. That doing right things, also take more than oneself's experience and perspective.
@TexasVignir Who gives you the right to decide who's to be better? No one at all. Until you get that through your dumb fucking skull, good luck with trying to get rid of people you hate. So standing or fighting against something that requires no logical reasoning other than pure opinion is great? So if I go around killing 20 civilians on the street, that's justified cause I give myself the right? LOL. Stop stalking me please, and grow some simple common sense.
@TexasVignir Really? He stood for things greater than being equal? He stood for things greater than being a respectful human being? He stood for things greater than peace? Shit, if that's great then I guess the world we're living in is a lie. Because that would mean all things bad and unfair is "just" and fair. That would be like me stealing from a poor person and calling it "standing for a greater cause", because I see him as a degenerate lowlife. But no, that's idiotic. You are the hypocrite.
I laugh at these stupid anti fucks because they are clueless!I for 1 am a lone wolf and i know im sick and the end is a few years out!I refuse to die a straw death so i will go down in a blaze of glory!!!
@ejtimm79 LOL, now you're stalking me? You're the one that needs a life. I didn't even say anything on to you here, and i was talking about a white supremacist when i said rot in hell, now you support white supremacy? Makes sense, you crave white women like crazy
@ejtimm79 a dose of my own medicine? But i didn't go to other vids you comented on and stalked you. And what does you having a college education have to do with anything? will u shut the fuck up? that's all you keep talking about
@AryanBreederGirl I bet as a teenager you were to old for him!!! Go out & watch a video called nazi pop twins within that video your hero David Lane tells an under aged Lynx & Lamb Gaede he no longer thinks of then as his little girls but as fantasy lovers. He wanted to screw them the man was a pedophile glad he's dead
Comment removed
aryanlove777 3 months ago
Comment removed
aryanlove777 3 months ago
@aryanlove777 Your Aryan white ass?..I'm willing to bet $1000 you have NO IDEA what a true Aryan is, tell me - what 3 countries are comprised of the only TRUE Aryans - Btw, True Aryans never have or will follow the ideals of you False Aryan wannabees, you have no idea what an Aryan is...Hitler chose the label because he thought they were all blue eyed and blond. well a few of are..but the majority are dark haired with various eye color and we come from a specific area of Indo-Europe.
Offskew 3 months ago
@aryanlove777 Btw the way, I am Caucasian and not of Jewish descent or any nationality that has ties to the Jewish faith...so don' try to take that road with me in your answer..I am of ARYAN descent ans sick and tired of all you wannabees and your "Hitler was an Aryan BS" Hitler was from Austria and his father had a Jewish bloodline from a few generations back...now figure that one out..
Offskew 3 months ago
RIP DAVID .................
dazzlindarrent 3 months ago
interesting fact david lane had chinese blood in him .
Xpwn0graphicX 4 months ago 6
@Xpwn0graphicX Got any proof to this? All I see is rumours.
BorrebytheViking 2 months ago
rip david lane u had everything right we need to kill it if it isnt white
MrJCowboy 4 months ago
what a great man i have meet him in my days 1488 brother dam the goverment sucks and the prision i was told they killed him while he was asleep fuck faces cthey cant even face him when he was alive what chups they are the they should drop dead yes i am a aryan woman and im proud bitches so drop dead asses the aryan race will live no matter how many time we die there is another that is being born we will fight till the end rip david lane
aryanlove777 4 months ago 2
@aryanlove777
You are a great woman. Sieg Heil, mein Frau!
NSPride1488 3 months ago
FUCK YOU BURN IN HELL WANKER
kentokie 5 months ago
Damm i hate being white some times..
DjGummzzi 5 months ago
@DjGummzzi go to your local inner city and get mobbed by niggers
TheVincent0909 4 months ago
@TheVincent0909 You know, when it comes to intellectual acheivements, the indo-aryans really are superior as you and your neo-nazi buddies often say. But when it comes to things like running, agility, and flexibility, negro is superior and you whites are behind.
lutzdify 4 months ago
@lutzdify in that aspect you are correct, but when it comes to swimming, and weight lifting the aryan shines. I personally believe each race shines in one aspect over another
TheVincent0909 4 months ago
LOL. looks like a dirty old pedophile. i wonder where he parked the van?
YEAHIRAP 6 months ago 2
hey, I recognize that guy!
he had a megans law sign on his front lawn.
ya... thats the guy......... I am pretty sure he is also the guy who got drunk and burned a fucking realtors sign on my black buddys front lawn.
lol.
I always assumed he was another crazy fucking homeless guy.
so whats the deal?
did he really hate realtors or something?
dcentc 6 months ago 2
大衛車道
chnlovefun 7 months ago
Uma justa homenagem a David Lane.
Danilo22190 7 months ago
I made sweet oily man love to david lane.
it was awesome.
sure, it got a bit gross when parts of his decomposing corpse began ripping from the rest of his generally soft, decomposed body, but god damn..... he got alot of holes now.
that nigga is kinky.
I highly recommend that all fans of david lane buy a shovel and go dig him up for some sweet loving.
you will thank me.
dcentc 9 months ago
@TexasVignir May you please stop copying what I am saying? I know that it makes perfect sense, but when you're using my words it insults yourself, and it makes me disgusted. I don't mind someone preserving their own culture. But I mind when someone is racist, makes fun of others and stereotypes just for the fuck of it. I don't see your race declining at all, neither do I any. That's no excuse at all to discriminate, and least of all that's down right NOT moral.
i6o4 10 months ago
@TexasVignir This is the real world. Almost everybody INCLUDING people of your kind don't agree with you. You HAVE NOTHING to prove to me other than your continuous barking of idiocy. It's kind of hilarious though, there are so many contradictions in religion, and it just shines so brightly through you. It's like you represent the fallacies in the bible and such. Thanks for that.
i6o4 10 months ago
@TexasVignir Hmm facts. Still see nothing that you've said other than name-calling. Everything else is from your own useless little supremacist group of friends who are to afraid to face people they hate except for when they are online. And even when you guys commit "violent" acts, it's a select few that are probably the emptiest minded out of all of you. You haven't proven anything wrong. Everything you have said is because "YOU favor it". And just because you favor it you see it as correct.
i6o4 10 months ago
@i6o4 We do have philosophy behind our politics. You just haven't learned of it.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@TexasVignir What does genocide have to do with faith and my moral compass? How does that relate to each other, what the fuck is wrong with you? Just because I don't believe in God doesn't mean I'm not moral. You're such a fucking twisted imbecile who's trapped in a closed mind that won't open by any means necessary. Did you know that your "supremacist groups" only occupy not even 1% of the world? Do you think that your views can set aside the other 99%? I doubt it.
i6o4 10 months ago
@i6o4 So typical of your crowd. You believe that the truth is subject to the vote. You think that the wisdom is something that can be found by the method of voting on what wisdom is. You believe that what is right is what is popular.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 Of my crowd? I am my own self, fully unique and capable of thinking for myself. Nobody can ever fill or change my morality other than through my mind and heart. I believe in the right of equality, and if it may happen to be more "popular", so beat it. I also believe in the right to defend others that are being insulted/harmed for injustice reasons, which is NOT popular. Trust me, this has put a toll on my character.
i6o4 9 months ago
@i6o4 Mind and heart, huh? Okay, then. I'll give it a try. I begin with what morality, properly understood, really is. It's a survival tool. Specifically, it is a prescription for behavior aimed at preserving the survival of its practitioner group; i.e., morality is survival above the individual level. That is why moral systems evolved among humans. It doesn't exist to give you pleasant feelings. Doing what is right can make you feel very bad.
Jenab7 9 months ago
Comment removed
Jenab7 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jenab7 All proper moral systems put survival of the practitioner group, the continuation of its existence, in first place of value. Moral systems that do otherwise, that put anything else in first place of value, are not proper. Why survival first? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value to dead things. Because only to something alive may anything else be good.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 And, since what doesn't exist has no value, what can't survive isn't worth much. Moral systems that prescribe behavior that leads to the practitioner group's extinction are worth less, are inferior, compared with moral systems that prescribe behavior that keeps the practitioner group alive.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 The repetition of history's mistakes occurs because man repeatedly confuses sentimental humanitarianism with morality, which happens in turn because man is not, quite, intelligent enough to distinguish between what is virtue and what makes him feel virtuous. We waste our energy in a futile resistance to natural laws and bend the knee only when our means of resistance has been exhausted—at which moment our capacity for doing much of anything else has also been exhausted.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 For example, consider the humanitarian drive to "feed the hungry," particularly, as prevailing politics demand, in some region where the hungry are not white. What is the intent? To end hunger. What is the result? To increase the numbers of hungry people. Has the result been well-documented? Certainly. Why do some men insist on the continuance of a policy that contains obvious flaws and has obviously always failed? Because it makes them feel virtuous.
Jenab7 9 months ago
Comment removed
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 Real virtue would prescribe that men do as experience shows to be wise, which means (in part) effective. But acting thus requires just a bit more intelligence than most men have. Now, which form of government most effectively drowns the signal of wisdom in the noise of mediocrity? Democracy does. Democracy might give people the pleasant feeling of being "involved," but it wastes human energy in the same way that a poorly designed engine wastes mechanical energy.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 I'll try to illustrate. Let us say that our job is to hire people to assemble two old-fashioned pocket watches from their parts scattered on tables. To one table, we invite 100 randomly chosen democratic voters. To the other, we invite a watch-maker. At the former table, we have the advantage of multifaceted and diverse opinion. At the latter, we merely have competence and suitability for the task at hand. At which table, then, will a watch most likely be assembled such that it works?
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 The effective administration of a country is even more intricate than putting together a pocket watch. It is not a task for which the customers (citizens) will be well-served were it left to persons whose only recommendation is that they know how to vote. Every day, a government must make decisions that would require the most careful consideration in even the greatest minds, and yet they are, in democratic countries, made by men who lack every qualification for the task.
Jenab7 9 months ago
Comment removed
Jenab7 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jenab7 Why did you THINK that people in democratic countries are never content? It is because they elect people who really don't know how to do the governing job well. Thomas Jefferson made only one major error of political philosophy. He believed that the common people formed a reservoir of wisdom that would help America recover its proper direction if ever it were to stray. Nonsense. The common man constitutes no such resource. You don't get expertise by summing mediocrities.
Jenab7 9 months ago
Comment removed
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 Equality isn't a "right." It is a relation between two or more objects (or animals, or people). To say that two things are equals is to make the strongest possible comparison between them. To say that it would be moral to treat unequal objects as if they were equals is false. Just as you don't treat food and poison in the same way, neither should the law treat unequal people in the same way.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 Consistency has never been a strong suit of the political left. If race doesn't matter, then why does a company staffed entirely by white people bother anybody? Surely that arrangement of people is just as good as any other. Apparently not, in the opinion of doublethinking leftists. Now, leftists will probably come back and say that the races do differ, but only in superficial ways that have no social significance. But let's consider the plausibility of that opinion.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 All racial differences arose from the process of natural evolution, and evolution works the same way for humans as for any other species. While we agree with the leftists that the races differ in "cosmetic" ways, we don't think it is likely that nature was very careful to permit ONLY racial differences having no social significance of which a leftist might disapprove. For that to have happened, evolution would have had to have been a very carefully guided process, which it wasn't.
Jenab7 9 months ago
Comment removed
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 It isn't even remotely possible that natural evolution neatly apportioned all racial differences to the side of social insignificance. Some are bound to be very significant indeed. And we believe we've found a few of them. The races seem to differ in the distribution of general intelligence. And we have noticed that some races are more prone to commit acts of violence and theft than other races are. Which is to say that the theory of racial equality is pure hokum.
Jenab7 9 months ago
@Jenab7 I did not realize you wrote an entire essay until now... Didn't show up on my message folder. Anyhow, to determine which ethnicity are genetically advanced are false selfish ideologies. I don't fit on the spectrum, therefore anybody assuming I'm this or that is ridiculous. In Canada the two major parties are either the Libs or the Dropout Harper leading the Cons. I'm not a fan of either, nor any other Bloc/Green/NDP.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 I believe genetically, geographically, there are patterns in societies that will exist. To say that the pattern will never break is a far-fetched call. I also believe the notion of "proving oneself" based on the onset of skills, determination, and work ethic. Whether or not the person is of racial difference, or even a complete asshole, I am still able to respect the person for what he/she has accomplished, setting aside any differences.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 I don't care whether or not there is a group entirely of white people. I always notice it when the class watches political videos (even modern parliament buildings) contain mainly white ethnic backgrounds. It only bothers me that there are people that look down on me for being born the way it happened to be. The result is me, and I will have to deal with it. It also just so happens to be that a minority of "all-white" groups tend to be openly racist.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 Again, who decides who is equal or unequal when it comes to a standard human being only differentiating in ethnicity? The only thing I could see possible is opinion, as stated is only a mere thought or judgment and not a fact.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 That's true and I can see that. It's a shame that government has made changes to lessen education funds, teaching us little-to-no in depth details about politics. To be honest I hate politics because of the way it is taught to our class, but more importantly the loopholes and corruption that has tailed along with many systems of government.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 Again... true. In my generation I notice that the only possible way to succeed is self-motivation. Only 20% of students in my school have an average grade about 86%, reasons because they "want" to succeed. Others are not forced, their parents don't care, and the citizens of Canada in this century have become extremely lazy/mediocre as you said. I hardly even find that we as citizens are involved in government, reasons being that not even half the population votes.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 I can understand this, yet I believe this should absolutely not be a justification for racism. I don't support any fundraisers or spend a dollar a day for a child because I do not see any significant change in the world if I do so. Do I feel any less moral? I question myself, but I know that the change isn't important. People will die, and the weak will die off as you said, by nature's law. Though again, I do not stand by this reason as a justification for racism.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 To finish this. I sincerely hope you can understand where I am coming from, being at the age of 17 and growing. In my personal system, I believe proving oneself of his/her capabilities are far greater than racial difference. That doing right things come at great costs. That doing right things, also take more than oneself's experience and perspective.
i6o4 9 months ago
@Jenab7 I know it has. To define what's right is complicated, but never have I done something with results as always being happy.
i6o4 9 months ago
@TexasVignir Who gives you the right to decide who's to be better? No one at all. Until you get that through your dumb fucking skull, good luck with trying to get rid of people you hate. So standing or fighting against something that requires no logical reasoning other than pure opinion is great? So if I go around killing 20 civilians on the street, that's justified cause I give myself the right? LOL. Stop stalking me please, and grow some simple common sense.
i6o4 10 months ago
@TexasVignir Really? He stood for things greater than being equal? He stood for things greater than being a respectful human being? He stood for things greater than peace? Shit, if that's great then I guess the world we're living in is a lie. Because that would mean all things bad and unfair is "just" and fair. That would be like me stealing from a poor person and calling it "standing for a greater cause", because I see him as a degenerate lowlife. But no, that's idiotic. You are the hypocrite.
i6o4 10 months ago
I'm glad he's dead. What a disgrace to humans.
i6o4 10 months ago
to MrxAxLxDx1 Piss just off you gay and don't disturb
people remembering their friends !
Sportschuetze84 11 months ago
I laugh at these stupid anti fucks because they are clueless!I for 1 am a lone wolf and i know im sick and the end is a few years out!I refuse to die a straw death so i will go down in a blaze of glory!!!
qball090872 11 months ago
Will you just fucking die,and make the world a better place,along YOUTUBE!
ejtimm79 1 year ago
RIH david lane (Rot in HELL)
MrxAxLxDx1 1 year ago
@MrxAxLxDx1 Why don't you rot in hell bitch!
ejtimm79 1 year ago
@ejtimm79 LOL, now you're stalking me? You're the one that needs a life. I didn't even say anything on to you here, and i was talking about a white supremacist when i said rot in hell, now you support white supremacy? Makes sense, you crave white women like crazy
MrxAxLxDx1 1 year ago
@MrxAxLxDx1 I told your bitch-ass I'll be your worst nightmare asshole,I'm giving you a dose of your own medicine .
Unlike faggot,I work,and have a college education!
ejtimm79 1 year ago
@ejtimm79 a dose of my own medicine? But i didn't go to other vids you comented on and stalked you. And what does you having a college education have to do with anything? will u shut the fuck up? that's all you keep talking about
MrxAxLxDx1 1 year ago
Comment removed
lilalexEY 1 year ago
@lilalexEY you better kill yourself right now
oldinfant23 1 year ago
Comment removed
lilalexEY 1 year ago
Comment removed
lilalexEY 1 year ago
R.I.P DAVID LANE
14 PALABRAS SALVARAN AL MUNDO 14//88
RACISTAYORGULLOSO 1 year ago 6
14 words david lane
dazzlindarrent 1 year ago
14 words will live on
7579johns1 1 year ago
Aryan`s for all time...
greetings from germany(we made the start....)
MrVaginaficker 1 year ago
November 2, 1938 – May 28, 2007
RIP
StariSloven 1 year ago
RIP dear comrade
peer200 1 year ago
david lane rest in peace your spirit lives on in our hart
14/88
skinheadzwijndrecht1 2 years ago
I dont know what you are talking about!?
Hooliganzic 2 years ago
I used to call him daddy David but then i hit my teens and i was too old for him.
At least we had one baby together I am gratefull for that.
AryanBreederGirl 2 years ago
@AryanBreederGirl I bet as a teenager you were to old for him!!! Go out & watch a video called nazi pop twins within that video your hero David Lane tells an under aged Lynx & Lamb Gaede he no longer thinks of then as his little girls but as fantasy lovers. He wanted to screw them the man was a pedophile glad he's dead
Stheno490BC 2 years ago