Watchmen - TV Spot #11

[SeFu2006]

pretty creative but it gave away Rorschach's identity

[yourfaceismissing]

YES! A TV spot with that much maskless Rorschach can do no wrong. <3

[45andcounting]

0:04 I see a skull's features

0:12 I see 2 people kissing (Like Rorschach, only I haven't seen the movie I've just read the graphic novel)

0:20 I see a man with a woman on each arm

[1451tyler]

THAT IS FUCKING NICE.

What a badass advert

[juancarloscondegarci]

hey when is this going to be released for dvd, because bad luck didn't help me in my way to see it

[indyjones45]

0:15 Rorshach killing the child molester, only thats one of the tame shots, the first hit is EXTREMLEY disturbing

[QuarismaboY]

What is the Music used in this TV Spot ?

[IdotFilms]

whats the name of the song?

[hunterdan89]

that kinda takes away the surprise of seeing Rorschach's face

[sawjac13]

I see a butterfly.

A fat person dancing.

3 women.

[Pwells1]

I see a dog with its head split open. Is that bad?

[mothervideos]

Best movie i've seen so far this year. Rorschach was fucking cool.

[Cinemassacre2803]

At 0:04 I see an anglel

At 0:11 Two person kissing (like rorschach)

At 0:20 Two fat womens talking

[Oder87]

Jackie Earle Haley for Oscar!! He seriosuly amazed me. This movie was outstanding.

[zomaster1]

for sequel it should just be jackie earle haley as rorschach by himself, i think thats the best way to go for the studio.

and AstonishingSiepher you spelled rorschach wrong there are only 2 r's not 3.

[pikminblue1]

wow your dumb. did you even watch the movie let alone the comic?

[zomaster1]

yes i did and knowing how greedy the studio is they would go through making a sequel/and or prequel on maybe on one of the characters from the film.

[pikminblue1]

but how could they do a sequel for Rorschach? he *spoiler* died... plus why make a sequel it would just ruin the excitement.

[zomaster1]

i know but they're gonna find a way and if new comes out that they're going to do a sequel just protest.

[pikminblue1]

how can you find a way to bring back a person/animal/thing back to life if it's been blown up? it's called chemical change not physical change.

[zomaster1]

they'll probably make something up, like someone else takes over the Rorschach name or something.

[Carlos6194]

They will never make a sequel that is just a big slap across Alan Moores face.

[zomaster1]

yea i know its a book that stands alone but since this movie made a lot of money they're gonna do another one. but the only thing i think they should do is just do a re-make in like 15 years, or just 5 like they did with the hulk movies. also im sorry i called you out on your misspelling of Rorschach name it happens to everyone.

[neoxthexone1]

The movie struggled to make 60million so I don't think there'll be a prequel

[ShinDaMadness]

Wasnt the opening weekend like 55 mil?

[Carlos6194]

It was actually 60 mill but it made like 90 mil over all

[dantemiguel93]

How can they say the movie tanked?

Please explain...

[Carlos6194]

I dont know maybe because they hate the movie and dont respect a good film

[RoadDogXVIII]

The thing is that it was overstuffed with so much information from the comics that it felt claustrophobic. And too often did it deviate from the plot. Jackie Earle Haley killed as Rorshach, I won't lie.

[keesvdijkhuizen]

Awesome but so spoiling for people who haven't read the book!

[AstonishingSiepher]

Jackie Earle Haley as Rorsharch was truly awesome!!! He should get a nomination in the oscars IMO.

[celesteesputa]

this is the best movie of the year

[DRisLegend200919]

coooooool!