Added: 1 year ago
From: younhol00
Views: 1,823
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (348)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Says the man who has to grovel before a fucking ghost because he's afraid of going to some torture dungeon. BRAVE PEOPLE DONT NEED IMAGINARY FRIENDS FOR HELP, THEY NEED REAL ONES.

  • Why are creationists always such retards on youtube? I don't mind people having beliefs but this is genuinely a bit depressing.

  • They won't debate you because you say there are not facts supporting evolution, YOU MUST BE BLIND AND STUPID.

  • Creatards are Stupid. There is no such thing as an Evolutionist.

    Watch Don's videos if you want evidence of evolution.

    If you think Nephi is right you are too stupid to listen to.

  • Um.....what kind of coward disables ratings on their videos??? This is irony at it's most disingenuous. Also, you may wish to get your facts straight...not that I have a 'dog' in this fight, but it really strains me to see people so blatantly mis-stating the facts. Perhaps you may wish to review Donexodus2's video re: same debate. Good day sir.

  • @symbian7 religion is increasing if you actually look around you.

  • What is funny, to my knowledge, Neph didn't bend at all for Don and Neph wanted to control a lot of it.

  • Evolutionists are cowards says the man too afraid to allow ratings on his videos.

  • @biggingeryeti this man is god LOL

  • ''I been watching this uhhh debate uhhh from uhhh not debate but the uhhh but challange uhhh ''

  • Just shut up. "Evolutionists" are "Religious freaks?"

    So funny.

  • Says the person who disables likes and dislikes that would actually show how valid his claim is.

  • @younhol00 nephilimfree is a lying censoring person who changed every part of the debate and he says he didn't, whats that you want proof of what i said watch this video /watch?v=OM2tMaaH6lw it shows neph contradicting himself and if you don't watch the whole thing you'll prove that creationists just drown out truths and say its wrong.

  • "Evolutionists are cowards!" screams the man who disables ratings.

  • Religion is dying. Of course people are going to fight to save this emotional crutch.

  • Tides go in, tides go out! You can't explain that!

  • Debate is not where science is proven or disproved. Same goes for the court system. If you want to disprove a scientific theory you use scientific method. Debate is the worst place to defend a scientific theory since a person can make a multitude of points that would take hours to actually contest. You would have to read a lot of scientific papers from different fields to properly answer just one question sometimes.

  • Your ignorance is painful to watch...

  • Why does a rainbow show up on the sky after rain? - Magic

    Why does the sun go down at night? - Magic

    Why do objects fall towards the ground? - Magic

    How did everything came to be? - Magic

    How did nylon eating bacterias appear shortly after nylon was discovered? - Magic

    How did the different dog breeds came to be? - Magic

    The Bible: answering all questions since the first century - knowledge have never been so easy

  • Internal fortitude? you have no EVIDENCE. We do. From fossils to viewing the HIV virus changing to the history of wolves, dogs and cabbage to imposing the right environmental constraints to make algae grow multicellularly, accepting evolution is the only reasonable course of action.

  • "Dealing with you people..." Who exactly is "you people?" Are you talking about the whites, blacks, Hispanics, asians, europeans...? Are you talking about the bankers, psychologists, doctors, scientists...? Those who accept evolution are the most diverse group of people on this planet. Indeed, the only thing that unites us is our rationality. Those not fitting into the category of "you people" are void of this rationality.

  • "science is only possible...that it can prove creation" Do i need to say anything? Really? Science is making sense of data, of trends, it is extrapolating statistics to real-world phenomena. There is no data, no trend, of creation. Your self-assurance confirms my previous posts.

  • "really Tunderf00t? We're trying to debunk science?" Yes, just like your kind has throughout history. Begin in the middle ages and end in Salem. Evolution has EVIDENCE. We have SEEN evolution happen. The Theory of Evolution has been tried and tested using the scientific theory and has survived. By saying evolution is just wrong without evidence, you are saying there is something intrinsically wrong with the scientific method; in other words, TRYING TO DEBUNK SCIENCE.

  • "...and not one do we act childish, stupid..." Oh really? Children think they're always right, or at least the ones i work with do. Conceding points allows for a good conversation. Stubbornly saying "Nuh uh!" only shows your own immaturity. The world is 4 billion years old. This is a FACT. You can dispute it all you want but you will never convince anyone in their right mind because you have no EVIDENCE.

  • So you spend the first third of your video bitching about DonExodus2 not showing up for debate, then start squealing about how a line up of people who actually CAN debate is "obviously a trap." Do you see the flaw here? If not, it just became a whole lot easier to see why you are a creationist.

  • How many books have you read in your lifetime? My guess is about three, including such classics as "Go dog, go," "Hop on Pop", and "Green Eggs and Ham." Probably haven't even read the Bible through and through, as is the case with most "religious" types. Why don't you learn what evolution actually says through experts in the field who have produced literature with the intention of informing you instead of hearing OPINIONS and taking them as fact?

  • Peer-reviewed papers. Try to publish anything in a peer-review paper. The paper gets ripped to shreds if it is not factually correct. Put this little speech in writing and try to publish it in a peer-reviewed paper. They probably wouldn't even contact you back.

  • You are mentally handicapped. Seek help immediately.

  • No man, evolution isn't pseudo-science at any point, contrary to creation that actually is, since damn, how can it be scientific to have things appearing all of a sudden bcuz of the will of a supernatural being? This is near to the tribal religions who belief that rain, for instance, is supernaturally created.

  • Is this a joke?

    Not only did I just hear you call evolution a religion.

    And say that evolution is not a science and doesn't live up to the scientific method.

    And then claim that creationists present facts.

    And to say that Howind has ever won a debate.

    Evolution is a proven fact - but for the sake of argument lets take it of the table.

    So please show ANY kind of evidence that creationism is true. Some kind of proof for the flood for instance. Or Adam & Eve. Or Jesus' miracles. Or the Exodus.

  • Pity and sadness. That's my only comment. You're just sad.

  • Well I will give you credit for not screening your comments like Neph and Shock do. And for that , I thank you.

  • You're the coward for disabling ratings on your video and comments. Why do all creationists do that?.

  • @dec0y8 indeed. doesn't want himself to look bad for 'Jesus'...

  • would you debate me... with thunderfoot as moderator?

  • Nephi is soooooo stupid. Thanks Don for proving evolution happens.

  • 3:20 is where you begin to lie

  • wow, they keep coming out... why dont you go inside a university and study please.

  • >Video title "Evolutionists are cowards"

    >Ratings disabled

    >MFW you're a coward.

  • I'd thumbs up your comment but this guy is too cowardly to leave ratings enabled. Got to love irony and projection.

  • The statement:'Science can only conclude Creationism to be true..' is quite telling of what you assume science is? Science has no 'absolutism' in its methods.The current state of affairs as to how 'Evolutionary Theory' became so forefront in Biology is its ability to model how living systems in all species share common characteristics because of heredity.Common ancestry of all living things. And now modern laboratory methods can sequence genomes of all the living groups... the data is facinating

  • @thwoolfe...and you atheists think your somehow better and we are puny?mhm well im far from puny mentally or physically,and in person id knock you out with ease my freind.if you were worth it,sadly your the only puny one,you will die under your own igorant and arrogant ways..

  • @thwoolfe..haha evolution trash never fails to stink..so be it then small timer,laugh all you like,doesnt make what you say anyless wrong...or me anyless right so continue riding darwins dead dick.

  • What the hell is an evolustionist?

    Are there any Newtonians or Archmedians around?

    Maybe we can track down down some Voltaireians? Or some Rutherfordians?

    What about Einsteinians? Or even Hawkinsians?

    Beg your pardon, but did go to caveman school?

    Science is a wonderful thing to leave stone age behind, and even bronze and iron age. you, my dear, are stuck in the thinking of bronze age goat herders.

    i pitty you.

    Get some education, use your brains, use your time to get some intellect.

    regards

  • Creationists refuse to face facts because it threatens their religious convictions.

  • this is disgusting!!! what are your credentials? you are a pathetic bunch of ignorant and supertitious cowards!

  • Actually Neph was the one who didnt show up to the place that HE chose, he turned up an hour late at another site.

  • It would appear that every part of your face is fighting for dominance.

    Your ears are losing

  • I have often wondered who actually believes what NephilimFree spouts - discovering you was anticlimactic.

  • Only a moron would participate in a debate that has had its rules set by Neph. An exception, of course, could be made if the debate rules have been examined by someone who knows what the hell a debate is supposed to be, but then I can't imagine Neph would agree to play ball. On second thought, maybe he would, then just disregard anything he didn't like as it pleases him.

  • Man this is weird. How come you are of a different ethnicity than me?

    Goodness, it couldn't be because of evolution!!

  • @ScizRgaming

    lol yeah

    thats a nice point.

    did noah take a pair of blacks,asians,indians etc onto the ark as well :D

    i wonder what goes on in cultists brains. Well, neph is clearly insane and extremely dangerous, im not joking with this one. But whats the excuse of other cultists who are in favor of neph?

  • @GIANTpinkMOUSEKATEER Hey kid you are the epitome of emotions and weapons grade stupidity, for that your block and your insane comment gets deleted. Learn from this experience next time you open your mouth, think before speak.

  • is it me or does this guy look and sound like a talking neaderthalensis?

  • I will try and say this in the least offensive way possible. Evolutionists don't want to debate with people like you (or should I say people like Neph) because it is a waste of time. Nephilimfree has proven time after time again, he does not know a THING about science. His only goal is to try and claim victory over evolutionists by resorting to cheap tactics like making fallacy-ridden arguments and when we try and point that out to him, he'll deny everything. Why do you think he censors so much?

  • @TruthofthePeople No no no he also understands pseudo-science, which you all are trying to place above science. That's all we are pointing to you. Your evo devo priests we'll be demolish if they face a guy like NF. The funny thing is that ur evo devo priests incinerate themselves every time they open their mouths, we just point that out to you.

  • @younhol00 Pseudo-science? What do you mean by that? Are you trying to deny proven fact now? Because yes, evolution is a fact. And no, there is no definitive proof that there is an intelligent designer behind it.

    And again, no offense intended but if you've WATCHED some of Neph's videos (where he explains some of his concepts) you'll see what little he understands. If you think for a second that he holds a candle to qualified individuals then you're almost as deluded as he is.

  • @younhol00 Evolution is science. Give me a break...

  • @younhol00

    evolution and common ancestry is pseudo-science? i guess the 99% of earth and life scientists on this planet who accept evolution and common ancestry are pseudo-scientists.

  • @itzahazy

    You=straw man/appeal to authority=fail. You know or polled 100% of all "earth life scientist"? If you don't up-hold a secular materialistic world view of the ugly red head step child called evolution it's like blasphemy in Islamic countries, they terrorize & KILL (you career)! It's reasonable to consider an intelligent energy in the universe & life. Science is OBSERVATION, data, mathematical solutions, repeatable experiments, not your wishes. Evolution=waste of time + NOTHING useful.

  • @gmcjetpilot

    your comment was nonsense..there is no evidence in the scientific community that goes against evolution. it's not that they silence anyone who goes against it. the only ones who go against it are creationists. and creationism claims an eternal god transcendent of reality created life. this is NOT science. the truth is, there IS NO other scientific explanation for the diversity of life on this planet. if there was, scientists would be pursuing it looking to win a Nobel Prize.

  • @gmcjetpilot

    the entire scientific process is centered around falsification. science is applied skepticism. when evolution was first presented, everyone tried to falsify it, just like they do with any other scientific theory.. to THIS DAY, earth and life scientists are STILL trying to falsify evolution, because after all, THAT'S WHAT SCIENCE IS..yet, the theory is only gaining strength is several scientific fields. this is because in the realm is genuine science, it has NOT been falsified.

  • @younhol00 ...Did you just say he understands pseudo-science? Holy shit.

    Let me ask you a question. Would you debate someone who believes the earth is flat? Would you honestly waste your time on that? If not, there's the reason evolutionists don't debate creationists.

  • @BigLundi No creationists believe in a flat earth, that is disingenious at best, but there is no honesty from psedoscience believers.

  • @younhol00 I didn't say creationists believe the earth is flat. I asked if you would debate with someone who believed the earth was flat.

    Let me explain my point, since you're not grasping it. If science tells us something is fact, and others choose not to believe it, why bother arguing with them? Evolution is scientific fact. Arguing it is nonsense, just like arguing the world is round is nonsense.

  • @BigLundi "I didn't say creationists believe the earth is flat" No that's exactly what you meant, the video is in reference to done chicken out of a debate because he lost he's huevos somewhere. We are challenging your pseudo-science, and helping you understand that has no business in science. The last several debates in the magic sandwich show, and skype shows how mentally insane evolutionists are with their pseudo-science.

  • @younhol00 Don't tell me, what the fuck, I meant by what I said. I meant exactly what I said. I never said flat earthers and creationists were the same, I said that the concept of denying scientific fact is equivalent. We're not pseudo-science, we're real science. 95% of all scientists believe evolution is a fact. How is that a pseudo-science? We have mountains of evidence that evolution happened. HOW is that fake?

  • @younhol00 What are you on?

  • @younhol00 You are calling science pseudo-science. Since Darwin proposed natural selection as the main mechanism for evolution, scientists have made many discoveries that are consistent with the Theory of Evolution. Evolution is considered a fact by 99.9999% of real biologists. The only place of debate is on Youtube and on the most retarded and biased regions of the planet. If you want to contradict Evolution, then you must first fully understand it and point out gaps that disprove Evolution.

  • @younhol00:

    flat earth is a nice example to demonstrate the pathetic believes creationist have.

    evangelicals are the world's joke, and the educated worls is really concerned about a nuclear superpower having nutjobs who might be able to get their bronze age hands on the stuff.

  • @thwoolfe your a fool,go kill your whole family,then yourself because since god doesnt exists,you may as well be dead already,your life has no point or meaning at all.lol bronze age,oh im sorry bronze aged people will use nuclear weapons like america used em on japan? was the man who killed all those ppl a bronze ager? ha! your scum.

  • @thwoolfe your a fucking joke,your life is a fucking joke,and educated world,with all that education instead of doing good,these so called educated people can only make weapons for killing other human life to stay on top and maintain control through deceit,murder and crime.

  • @thwoolfe oh n by the way,people in running this country and your sorry waste of human life ass are religious too,oh but they just have to be stupid because they believe in God,gods,or anything supernatural right? your an awful,foul,evil hateful person.atheists say their safer than christians,but your worse than holy than thou christians,you scum play by the rules of society,to fit in,you follow law for the sake of the law,you have no true morals

  • @billy5939:

    so where did i personally insult you?

    let me guess: you are loving christian?

    and supernatural believes, in most cases superstitions i would guess, are fine, as long those believing those fairy tales for the feeble minded do not bother others with the crap.

    You act aggressive, you call others to kill their beloved? go and repent and hit yourself on your back or so? ;)

    Religidiots are a major problem of this world.

    nearly no difference between evangelicals and fundamental muslims.

  • @thwoolfe ha! okay star trek darwin dick sucking computer nerd.you atheists are far more worse and damn right im strong when scum like you attacks other peoples faith and puts them down.who the fuck are you? your a nothing and a nobody anyway.your life is meaningless when you die,according to you,ITS ALL OVER. so live while you can and be as much of a dick as you can be.

  • @billy5939:

    my compliments to your parents teaching you good manners.

    You may believe in the easter bunny if you wish. you may say so - your right of free speech.

    but, i beg your pardon, i may laugh at this nonsense as long, as often and as loud as i will, if i hear this pathetic stories.

    and, if i may, in all humbleness, you do not know anything about me.

    but at least i have some manners.

    your "faith" is your private thing. keep it private or get used to get ridiculed, puny creationist.

    LOL

  • @younhol00 Creationists did believe in a flat earth, read the first page of the bible.

    And you missed the point again. You would not debate a flat earther because you think they are silly and uneducated because we have pictures of the earth from space. Scientists won't debate creationists because bible worldview people don't understand science, logic, won't look at the evidence and don't understand how evolution works, how geology works, how DNA is used by all life.

  • @younhol00 You do know the Flat earth society is made up of christians right?

  • @younhol00 You missed the point. What evidence would make you ''believe'' in evolution.??

    Nothing? Then why make it seem like there is a debate between Science vs God OR argue with someone so brainwashed that you can never change their minds.

  • @gregrutz molecular test with dna, like sequencing and the molecular clock. fossils and test with insect, plants and lizards. also, bacteria. micro beings who adapt themself to antibiotica and vaccins, in other words evolution. that, for me, is the evidence that support for me the theorie of evolution.

    other point, why is there a debate between sciences vs god? wich field of science?

  • Evolution? Religion???? Riiiight. Ok.

  • Why would you debate a willingly ignorant person who asserts that speciation is impossible because mules are sterile, other than for public amusement and making fun of him?

    If donexodus didn't debate nephilimfree, that is because of his superior ethics.

  • When it comes to evolution who to believe.

    On the one side there is the eminent Professor Richard Dawkins with years of research and evidence behind him and on the other side there is Nephy and this character younho100.

    Now where do I put my trust?

  • @JojobasWitness Casue , like most Creatrds he is a lying jerk

  • Please tell the world why you believe in a 15-foot tall Adam. The world is still waiting.

    You're silly.

  • @jdh501 I already answer your question in another video, I am not going to do it again.

  • We don't debate because there IS NO DEBATE!

  • @Atheeizm You are right how do you debate real science from the evo's anti science, ignorance is bliss and it should stay that way for you'll right!

  • @younhol00 you realize that like all of the scientists say evolution is true, right? don't you thin they is a reason?

  • @shockofFSM "don't you thin they is a reason?" Yeah is call brainwashing.

  • @younhol00 oh, the irony.

  • Sir, would you mind turning your audio and microphone up, I get tired of people making videos but you can't hear a damn thing they're saying. I'd appreciate it.

  • I mean honestly - what facts do you have? :/

  • I don't understand what you are talking about. Creationists don't even do any original research, they just quote mine and distort scientific research that other people do.

  • @JojobasWitness I've seen otherwise.

  • @JojobasWitness Because emotional psycopaths of the atheistic evo persuasion will be able to shut down my video in order to restrict my speech. Hey as long as u get something to say is all good, so stop complaining.

  • I'm starting to think this guy is a troll. You really don't believe what you're saying right? You are aware that Evolutionary Theory has pretty much been proven correct?

  • @YetAnthony The scientific evidence points only to Creation, Now forget about this issue because is irrelevant now watch the documentary and do something.

    w w w . youtube . com / watch ? v = AQv - sdMCClQ

  • @younhol00 "The scientific evidence points only to Creation"

    How do you know that? Define God and provide your evidence.

  • @YetAnthony Look somewhere in your life something happen that make you doubt the Creator and his Creation, or you just go along with the crowd and find comfort in knowing there is a lot of you that deny the scientific evidence for evolutionism. Now i am not interested in this useless argument with you. I have an open mind I looked at all positions in science with Logic and reason.

    Did you watch the link I gave you, are you doing something with the information.

  • @younhol00 Your link doesn't work. Please paste only "watch" and the portion after that. Or better yet, post the whole URL in the video description.

  • I'm not trying to troll you, but it is impossible for an atheist to debate the origin of species with a theist. They both reject each others "evidence".

    "Evolutionism" is not a religion either. The theory of evolution is a theory on the diversity of species. As with all scientific theories, if proven wrong it will be disregarded. It is not a religion, nor is it a theory as to the origin of species.

    Please elaborate when you say science can only prove creation. I'm fairly certain it doesn't.

  • I love how the top creationist on youtube Neph is a high school dropout.

  • @cappercastro that HS dropout crap doesn't fly is a well known lie by a well known liar and a coward Donievolveintoachicken2.

  • Ummm, WRONG, Nephilim changed the rules so much and then declared empty victory! Besides, Nephilimfree couldn't debate his way out of a paperbag. I've debated Christians on the Bible, my expertise and Nephilim goes to the dark recesses of nowhere to pull idiotic ideas like the flood waters reaching the moon?, Huh?

  • @younhol00 Also, Canis lupus familiaris is the taxonomy used by the general scientific community to refer to the domesticated dog. While Canis familiaris is recognized as a synonym, it is technically not quite correct.

    The scientific name was reclassified as Canis lupus familiaris in 1993 due to overwhelming evidence from behavior, vocalizations, morphology, and molecular biology showing a link to Canis lupus.

  • @younhol00 I do not think that word means what you think it means. "Unforeseen" means "not seen or known beforehand; unanticipated" and is in no way a synonym for fantasy.

    Your argument seems to be "Wolves and dogs are different", but evolution could cause such differences. We have, for example, witnessed domesticated silver foxes become more dog-like over many generations, and they are now distinctly different from wild silver foxes.

    Again, I ask: How is this possible without evolution?

  • @RavagerOfWorlds Yes the differences between wolfs and dogs are there, nevertheless they are part of the same phylum, class and family, making them the same kind. However the differences are in height, color, and shape or cosmological, but morphologically they are the same which we creationists been telling you according to our model which is correct.

    "but evolution could cause such difference", see what I mean "could" means it didn't happen, evolution is made believe not scientific.

  • What the hell is an "Evolutionist" anyway? I know and accept math too. Does that make me a Mathist? I know how to drive. That make me a Drivist?

    You literally don't know what you're talking about, even in your title.

    Here's a fact. There's no such thing as an Evolutionist. Nobody bases their beliefs on evolution.

    It isn't a "religious worldview". You're either dead wrong, or a liar if you say otherwise.

    So quit acting so smug, you moron.

  • @Verrimgard

    ht tp : / / w w w . merriam - webster . com / medical / evolutionist

  • @younhol00

    Yeah, okay, and where, exactly, does it say that "a student of or adherent to a theory of evolution" includes unity and dogma?

    Evolution is not a religion. It isn't even a political stance, or a philosophy. It is an observation. You can no more worship or follow evolution than you can worship and follow math, or engineering, or history, or any other academic pursuit.

    The people you claim to be arguing against do not exist, which makes your entire argument ridiculous.

  • @Verrimgard @Verrimgard "It is an observation" Nothing can be observed via evolution. Is all a nice fairy tale in the efforts to destroy science or to have it conform to evolution. It is a religion, define very well as #4 in the merriam webster if you type religion a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith. No one is more fanatical and nasty than evolunatics, sorry evolutionists. 

  • @younhol00 ''Nothing can be observed via evolution.''

    Please by all means go free to utilize the power of the Internet or a public\college library to educate yourself on the topic ( evolution) . You clearly are ignorant of. For example, you can use a website known as Google to search out information. Using the search engine you can type in the following in criteria ''observed instances of evolution.'' And then read about the many observed instances of evolution. Thanks...

  • @DebateCreation Please dude I have done all that, your pathetic attempt at insults are childish and unnecessary. Do you believe that all dogs evolve?

  • @younhol00 ''Please dude I have done all that,''

    So then you are well-aware that evolution has been observed and your just being dishonest... Okay as long as that's clear.

  • @DebateCreation Evolution can't be observed is all based on conjectures and assumptions, that's not scientific and it is devoid of the scientific method. Evolution wants to force you and me to be unscientific and anti-science. You only believe it because it gets rid of God and and his magnificent Creation. I love science and can't get enough of it. You hate it and want it shut down for the stupidest, most insane anti science crap the planet have seen.

  • @younhol00 ''Evolution can't be observed''

    And yet it has dispute your claim... Of course you know that seeing that you claimed to have researched it. And are just deciding to be willingly ignorant (Dishonest).

  • @DebateCreation No it haven't it just happen because you are not intellectually honest nor you want it to be. For ex. evolution claims the earth is billions of years, the moon at a billion of years the moon will be collapsing the earth because is touching it. At a million years is so close it would've cause massive tidal waves massive enough to cover the entire earth, since all live already exists on the evo model how can they survive? Think about that one

  • @younhol00 I see you enjoy the art of physiological projection...

    As for the Earth-moon tidal interaction... That is a good one. You almost had me for a second. as I was thinking you were really being series there for a moment, but it would be funny if someone really tried to use that argument which would require them to ignore all the paleontological evidence.

  • @DebateCreation The moon is receding from the earth at 2 to 3 centimeters per year that's a fact pal, so no I am not the one projecting but you, is clear you are projecting your failure towards me. Stop swallowing for once and pay attention. What does paleontological evidence have to do with the moon receding? Nothing.

  • @younhol00 Now that's funny, and here I was thinking you were pertaining to be dumb. But what the hell, I'll bite. Let's say it's receding at 3 cm or let's even be Generous and speed it up bit and say it's receding at 4 cm. And lets be uniformitarianist for a moment. With the moon being what 366,000 km away from the earth. All one needs to do is use a math and... (y/4cm) = 9.15 billion years . And boy are your wrong. But thanks for the laugh. And to answer your question: everything...

  • @DebateCreation You are one unscientific pal, I am not even going to continue with this, there are so many articles on this Nasa particularly that you don't want to read it, I know it crushes your stupid belief, Hey have at it continue to be ignorant that's not illegal.

  • @younhol00 just so you know the moon is get farther way from the earth.

  • Tell me, have you ever seen a dog? The modern domestic dog is the result of thousands of years of selective breeding, and most breeds bear little resemblance to the wolves from which they came. Modern experiments have shown that unforeseen physical changes can occur when wild canines are selectively breed to be friendly towards humans. This shows that such changes in form are possible, backing up the historic accounts of the same occurrence.

    How is this possible without evolution?

  • @RavagerOfWorlds "unforeseen physical changes" that's call a fantasy meaning not real, meaning evolution you don't think much. Cannis Lupus(Wolf) Cannis Familiaris(Domestic Dog). They are dogs and a five year old can tell you that. So desperate for evolution aren't you.

  • @younhol00 yes, they are dogs, what did you expect them to give birth to? please, debate me, i will destroy you.

  • Disprove Evolution. Go ahead. Try it.

    I bet your answer is, "I don't have to".

  • Wow...I actually lost track of how many times you were wrong here...

  • lol youre a silly man

  • lmao

    Younhol what branch of Science do u have a PhD in ??

    You sound like an ass in this video

    You dont even know what youre talking about.

    Even if you were presented with evidence, youre so dense and illiterate u wouldnt even know what it looks like, this is a joke

  • @onyxxx101 As always no substance just insults. Sorry kid the evidence points to a young earth and a Creator. I know that boils your blood and as a result you reduce yourself to an insidious, emotional, insane individual. Your insults are a joke and so are you.

  • @younhol00

    that doesnt answer my question

    thus proving your childishness by evading my question (pot meet kettle)

    Ill repeat it again, in case u didnt catch it

    WHAT BRANCH OF SCIENCE DO YOU HAVE A PHD IN? and let me follow it up with...

    that could allow you to be taken seriously when you speak against it (evolution)?

  • @onyxxx101 I don't have to have a science a degree to know the truth, many evolutionary scientists don't believe in evolutionism. The reason why they spew the stupidity and religion of evo is because they get fire or demoted. The reason why you believe this insanity is because it protects you from the fact this planet was created and a Creator is behind it. Hey if you love evolutionism more power to you, but don't say you weren't told otherwise on the day of judgment.

  • Nephilim Free didn't take the challenge. He tried to change rules many times, then he refused to appear, then turned up early without telling anyone and claimed victory.

    Seriously - if you treat Neph as some kind of hero, you are a fool. He is a laughing stock.

  • @thisguysajerk David and Goliath was still one on one, and who won the guy that took God's side. The chain of events showed a scary donny running away from the debate from one guy alone, not two nor three just one guy. This is typical of some one who claims to have the truth on his side, or proclaims I am stronger than you and realise it is not the case. Neph bent over backwards to please little donny's requests several times. Donny ran scare to his big brothers to protect him from a whooping.

  • @younhol00 "David and Goliath was still one on one, and who won the guy that took God's side"

    yea, who won? the guy that took gods side. and he was up against a giant. that's like 4 people. so it was like 4 to 1.

    so i ask you again, if Neph is correct and has God on his side, why won't he go debate? why won't he?

    Neph can't handle it and clearly God isn't backing Neph or Neph would go anywhere anytime to debate any atheist. but he won't.

    grow up already man. stop acting like a 12 year old.

  • @younhol00 the moral high ground would be to use kind words and to calmly discuss your views. the moral high ground would be talking to people with a tone of moderate respect, especially if you want them to listen to you and consider what you have to say.

    the moral high ground is not calling people "dumbass" or "coward" and then stating you'd call them worse, but you're not allowed.

    you clearly are not taking the moral high ground. not even close.

  • @thisguysajerk "to use kind words and to calmly discuss your views", We've tried that time after time just to be met with humanist phylosophy trash. I've tried to be civil, but I am tired of being nice. From here on out is nothing but a kick in the butt for you atheist, evo, humanist, insidious, insane people, there nice words.

  • @younhol00 "We've tried that time after time just to be met with humanist phylosophy trash."

    then you need to be open-minded. your attitude only drives people away from the religions.

    "I've tried to be civil, but I am tired of being nice."

    then you are a poor example of what i understand true christian values to be.

    "From here on out is nothing but a kick in the butt for you atheist, evo, humanist, insidious, insane people"

    so since you can't be intellectual you are forceful? interesting.

  • @thisguysajerk "then you need to be open-minded. your attitude only drives people away from the religions." Apparently you don't understand what it is to be open minded that's why your insidious.

    "then you are a poor example of what i understand true christian values to be"

    Negative you want me to bend over backwards to your humanists thrash I don't think so, the Lord commands us to wipe the dust of our feet and move along.

    You guys aren't intellectual please don't make me laugh.

  • @younhol00 "I know it hurts but those are the only words I am allowed to use."

    it doesn't hurt... numbskull. i'm pointing out the clear hypocrisy in what you're saying.

    and you further proved my point in this reply.

    the only words you're allowed to use? why can't you use other words? i don't get it?

    the point is you are trying to claim moral high ground, but all you do is call names and generally insult.

    that's not the moral high ground. especially if you'd rather use swear words.

  • @thisguysajerk the point is you are trying to claim moral high ground, but all you do is call names and generally insult."

    Ok here are some nice words, you are a bunch of immature, insane, and insidious people. The american sociologist association, place you at the bottom of the barrel of the most distrusted group in society. That study alone and the many others shows others the truth about humanism, or atheism.

    Now Donny backed out, and was defend it by 3 others, that's pathetic.

  • @younhol00 Neph backed out. there's ample evidence indicating such. i'm sorry you are fooled by neph, shock and the other hateful and lying individuals on youtube.

    just because we are distrusted is not our issue. it's yours. what reason are we distrusted?

    we may be the most distrusted, but we are also the lowest in commitment of crime. the atheist population in the prison systems is low. absurdly low. while the christian population in prisons is the overwhelming majority. interesting..

  • @thisguysajerk Neph issued the challenge to Donny, he accept it. If evolutionism is true why backed out and refuse to show up, appear on another show with 3 other evolutionists, and then demand to appear on his show the League of reason with three others. See in a fight there are two people the challenger, and the challenge. Since when is fair 4 on 1. On shock of God it would've been neph and donny, In my book that's fair 1 on 1. What happens is typical of an evolutionists.

  • i think you may be a bit insane but i'll debate you

  • 5:45 "You guys are religious fanatics".

    5:51 "A stupid insane religious world view".

    Are you denigrating religion by calling it stupid, insane and fanatical? Are you saying there is something wrong with having a "religious world view."?

    It sure sounds like you don't have very much respect for those who are religious.

  • shut the hell up. you and nephy fall into the same category, stupidity. i can't watch anymore than 2 minutes of your garbage.

  • @lardo444 of course you can't you are emotionally incline.

  • @younhol00 what??? what is "emotionally incline?" are you drunk?

  • you give me the sense that you've never done any research of the other side....you do realize that nephilimfree was in no way "fair" or even consistant in his conditions to the debate. Did you even watch don's vid. entitled "Nephilimfree caught lying through his tooth" Where don provides video and textual PROOF that neph is lying? .....I didn't think so. It cant be a coincidence that a massive majority of the people who don't do research are on the theist side?....(ps the answers no)

  • @boorens18 PS.....It seems neph didnt even show up to this debate....He arrived an HOUR late to his own debate. See video proof and evidence on the video I quoted earlier. Neph said the debate was at 2.....and doesnt show up.

  • @boorens18 I watch don pathetic attempt to make face to his subs in regards to the after fact of the debate. Hey if evolution is all true why didn't he show up and smack Neph, it was just neph alone one on one, like a fight. Don is your typical coward who says I can kick your ass, and then speaks of the technicalities of it. He ran he showed he's true colors, by issuing a debate on league of stupids with 3 other evo's to defend him How utterly pathetic is that.

  • @younhol00 Uh....dude...you are about as much of a fail in investigative skills as you are in science. Don DID show up for the debate. (see vid I cited for evidence) Neph showed up 2 HOURS late, then claimed no one showed up. So either A) Neph is so dumb he can't even figure out time....thus discrediting him in any subject up to and including science. Or B) he simply was afraid.

    So I ask you instead, how pathetic is THAT? Im serious, I want your response after these enlightening facts.

  • LOL, with all due respect you need to pull your head out of you ass. Can you give me one example of a creditable evolutionists being exposed as a "religious freak". As you dont understand what the word RELIGIOUS means here is the definition: "having a strong belief in a god or gods" Religion has NOTHING to do with the theory of evolution, if you cant understand this then you need raise your level of education past the 6th grade.

  • @JAX301209 tell me the other definitions of religion besides this one "having a strong belief in a god or gods"

  • @younhol00 What other definitions are you taking about? A religion is defined by the worshiping of a God or Gods. Atheists reject the existance of any Gods due to a lack of evidence & we dont believe in blind faith, hence Atheism is NOT a religion. Are you able to answer my question; Can you give me one example of a creditable evolutionist being exposed as a "religious freak?".

  • @younhol00 Lmao! Isnt it ironic that you do a vid calling "evolutionists" cowards, and then you run away form a very simple question! Its been over a month since I asked you "Can you give me one example of a creditable evolutionist being exposed as a "religious freak?" The lack of response is either, you dont have one and you're rude or you dont have one and you're running away! Good job proving religious hyporacy and lies :)

  • @JAX301209 You deny science in favor of evolution, you and those scientists who continue to put forth this insidious religion that passes as science. You want science to conform to evolutionism, when science discredits it altogether.

    Your denial ain't my problem, I have nothing to prove because it slaps you in the face every time you won't accept it, you made your choice. Your question is always answer you just won't accept the facts. Move along science hater

  • @younhol00 You're funny! How exactly does science "discredit it altogether" when 99% of the world scientific community agrees with evolution, OH wait are you saying that the worlds scientific community is wrong and that the disgraced creationist/ID "scientists" are right? WOW if that is the case then you're a conspiracy nut of the highest order! When questioning facts dont use arguments from ignorance, ID has has not shown anything except stupidity, & if you use it then you are stupid as well!

  • @JAX301209 99% no is more like 60% and even that 60% is afraid to speak against evolutionism because they get fired or demoted, there is a lot of news articles explaining that, the problem is you don't do no research. As a result you get emotional like a good sucker dumb ass, yes our religion of stupidity(evolutionism) keeps us safe in our mental retardation little worldview.

    Everything in the above posts shows only your emotionalism. ID constantly proves evolutionism is a big fat joke.

  • @younhol00 Wow you really are indoctrinated! You actually do believe all the ID/creationist BS, well I'm here to tell you that you opinion doent mean shit! Evidence in the real world, evidence is the only thing that matters and ID have FAILED to porve any of their hypothesies, they are creationists in white coats. ALL your arguments have already been destroyed watch: "Difference between Science and Intelligent Design(Creation)" by Kurpalac. Dr Ken Miller is a Christian scientist, he kills ID!