Holy shit this Mike Tellinger guy is blowing my mind. For years I have seen many temples found, some underwater, megalithic, but never seen anything from South Africa until now. Old too.I mean this is before the flood of Noah or the deluge that happened 10,000 BC and ocean levels rose 400 feet and some lands sank. Many questions need answering.
You know, the skeptic it me wants to doubt a 285,000 year old statue, but my skepticism also tells me that theThe Milky Way is one of the oldest galaxies in The Universe at over 13 billion years old, yet our own Solar System is only 4.5 billion years old. If we find life, even microbial life, on Mars, Europa, and Titan - Game over folks, God only knows what's in this Galaxy of ours. But intuition should tell you that things like this could exist, there are hundreds of billions of galaxies!!
manton 2050,If a person doesn't want to believe something no proof can change that,you are one of those people that wants to stay in your goofy so called normal world.It is your type of intellect that is holding back our own evolution.If you are an archaeologist,You clearly don't know much about archeology.Most are famous for not excepting anything that was not taught in their close minded idiotic school.
285,000 years old? Do you have any facts to back up this claim? You clearly don't know much about archaeology or the human past. If you are so sure about these claims, why haven't you published in a peer reviewed scientific journal like a real scientist?
@manton2050 Okay, first you call me a dickhead and then you say "no offense"? Why be rude? If you need to turn to ad hominem attacks it means you have no facts to support your argument. This man has proved nothing here or anywhere else. He is a fraud. He needs to put up the facts to support this wild claim. If he was right this would change our entire understanding of prehistory. So why hasn't he published this in a peer reviewed journal? Peace.
@sklothrop meaning you are what you are and I hate to break it to you,that's why I said no offense.You need to do more research and then you'll see what I'm talking about...peace
@sklothrop Because peer reviewed journals are unwilling to see anything that threatens their existing paradgms. First off conventional acadamia is, lets face it, to a great extent an exercise in subjegating ones self to mind control. Dont think so, how come every one through history who made any discoveries got ridiculed and persecuted? Secondly as in this case, the official archeolagey comunity have there personal reputations and financial securety invested in defending their obsolute model.
Holy shit this Mike Tellinger guy is blowing my mind. For years I have seen many temples found, some underwater, megalithic, but never seen anything from South Africa until now. Old too.I mean this is before the flood of Noah or the deluge that happened 10,000 BC and ocean levels rose 400 feet and some lands sank. Many questions need answering.
MightyZarkon 1 month ago
You know, the skeptic it me wants to doubt a 285,000 year old statue, but my skepticism also tells me that theThe Milky Way is one of the oldest galaxies in The Universe at over 13 billion years old, yet our own Solar System is only 4.5 billion years old. If we find life, even microbial life, on Mars, Europa, and Titan - Game over folks, God only knows what's in this Galaxy of ours. But intuition should tell you that things like this could exist, there are hundreds of billions of galaxies!!
Zelathago 4 months ago
Those amazing Africans!
moonstar7 7 months ago
@skolthrop--- Please use 'Spell check" or use a dictionary
Invictus4913 7 months ago
could you overlap captions? This is an important piece of information.
jtomorrow 10 months ago
(offense) :)
stickerlickertomo 1 year ago
manton 2050,If a person doesn't want to believe something no proof can change that,you are one of those people that wants to stay in your goofy so called normal world.It is your type of intellect that is holding back our own evolution.If you are an archaeologist,You clearly don't know much about archeology.Most are famous for not excepting anything that was not taught in their close minded idiotic school.
thejdrox 1 year ago
Reminds me of the hartley comet pics a bit.
sunmoonvirgo 1 year ago
285,000 years old? Do you have any facts to back up this claim? You clearly don't know much about archaeology or the human past. If you are so sure about these claims, why haven't you published in a peer reviewed scientific journal like a real scientist?
sklothrop 1 year ago
@sklothrop ur a dickhead no offense...he did prove it...look it up...Afro-Man...get with your ancestors.Peace.
manton2050 1 year ago
@manton2050 Okay, first you call me a dickhead and then you say "no offense"? Why be rude? If you need to turn to ad hominem attacks it means you have no facts to support your argument. This man has proved nothing here or anywhere else. He is a fraud. He needs to put up the facts to support this wild claim. If he was right this would change our entire understanding of prehistory. So why hasn't he published this in a peer reviewed journal? Peace.
sklothrop 1 year ago 2
@sklothrop meaning you are what you are and I hate to break it to you,that's why I said no offense.You need to do more research and then you'll see what I'm talking about...peace
manton2050 1 year ago
@sklothrop calling Mr Tellinger a fraud does strengthen the argument that you are a bit of a dickhead (no offence).
stickerlickertomo 1 year ago
@sklothrop Because peer reviewed journals are unwilling to see anything that threatens their existing paradgms. First off conventional acadamia is, lets face it, to a great extent an exercise in subjegating ones self to mind control. Dont think so, how come every one through history who made any discoveries got ridiculed and persecuted? Secondly as in this case, the official archeolagey comunity have there personal reputations and financial securety invested in defending their obsolute model.
warblerfish 11 months ago