Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (87)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • At 5.50 when Stephen Co pulled we can see the "patient" lifting a little. I can't say what it was but it looked like we was relieved of something. Looked like some weight was lifted from his shoulders. Something definitly happened there.

  • i dont actually believe these techniques have any medical benefit apart from maybe a placebo effect however watching this genuinely puts me in a state of mild meditation, so relaxing and i tend to fall asleep halfway through haha!

  • these kind of videos have to be longer

  • jeje al principio se me hace un mimo xD pero me gusta ver el video, es relajante

  • this guy is at work

  • Everything is so mystical, especially the "patient" in his sacred Hard Rock Cafe t-shirt.

  • this is exactly what  I needed

  • Could you explain the wetting of the hands with the spray bottle by the assistant? Is it for cleansing your hands? I'm interested to know.

  • @MrGooram

    Spraying the hands is cleaning them, thus cleaning off the negative energy so that the healer doesn't keep the negative with him.

  • @MrGooram The wetting of hands is to cleanse the dirty/disese energy. The liquid is alcohol sometimes mixed with lavender oil.

  • @venkimayyu Cheers

  • There will be an awesome Divine Healing Hands workshop in Scottsdale, AZ. It will be taught by Master Sha and one of the WWR. For detail, please go to azdivinehealinghands . com

    DHH training will take place in a 3 Day training on 3/30/12-4/1/12

  • I need energy healing lol

  • atma namaste. i suggest you refrain from discussing back and forth with persons who are talking rudely and harshly about Pranic Healing or disable comments on the video. This is very powerful stuff being shown here .you shouldn't put so much energy into arguments that seem to go no where..

  • @kidal91

    Thank you for your thoughts. However, I believe that the debate below has actually been helpfully clarifying.

    If you hit 'see all', you'll find that the focus has not been on reiki per se, but on the rigidly dogmatic commitment of today's science to a purely physical definition of life.

    Though that commitment is obvious enough, I touched on the specific case of a science journal editor who was hounded and harassed simply for putting a heretical article through peer review.

    namaste

  • @BestofEastWest the only available definition of life past that of physical laws is social, debates about natural science will always win because they have verified methods which do not rely on overly subjective "experiences". As such I agree in a way with Kidal91: physicalist commitments do not need to be displayed here, since natural science and non physical definitions of life are like oil and water. But I disagree that any comment should be disabled (a little anti democratic)

  • @foraquid

    "natural science and non physical definitions of life are like oil and water."

    This is exactly the sort of un-scientific dogmatism that explains academia's current climate of suppression.

    Once again: if any study, any article dares to conclude that non-physical realities are worthy of serious consideration, it is treated like religious heresy.

  • @BestofEastWest All you have done is re-state what you already think, which is perhaps the definition of dogmaticism. What is seen here is some form of metaphysics. Even natural science involves metaphysics, for instance "big bang" science (since they cannot directly "see" or prove modern theories of "everything"). However within the scientific community "everything" science is treated as a hypothesis, unlike here where there is no (acceptable) method of verification.

  • @foraquid

    You might have a point, except for the fact that this is not a science lab. It is simply healing practice that involves other than physical, other than scientifically understood or energies.

    By my earlier comments, I questioned today's scientific establishment and its blind rejection of any study that concludes with the possibility that such energies even exist.

  • @kidal91 Man, we just try to fight against ignorance.

  • A green washbasin cool.

  • whatever discussion goes its end to Faith healing.....

  • LOL What complete rubbish! I can't believe people are gullible enough to believe this bullshit! Modern science explains everything - this video is one of the stupidist things I have ever seen! I might watch it again just for a laugh!!

  • @MrJohndl

    Here's a rule of thumb you might follow - not physics, but scientific nonetheless:

    If you don't know what you're talking about, better not speak...lol

  • @BestofEastWest

    I do know what I'm talking about. Science is the only reliable knowledge we have. This stuff has been scientifically tested many times and failed every time, because it's bullshit. Get it? Now go away.

  • @MrJohndl

    Time and time and time again, what's been 'settled' in science has turned out to be anything but.

    Yes, yes, a knife will take out a tumor and chemo might work, too. Not so long ago, the idea of laser surgery would have been mocked by all believers in mainstream medicine. ...Using the same words you're using here...lol.

    Like it or not, the evidence of other, so-called 'miraculous' means of affecting a cure is overwhelming. Period.

  • @BestofEastWest

    We understand biology and the chemical processes that control the body. I have no time or tolerance for idiots that don't accept scientific knowledge. This crazy 'alternative' medicine is nothing but a placebo effect. You are so completely wrong it's almost funny. There is NO overwhelming evidence for alternative therapies - quite the contrary in fact. You're living in the wrong century.

  • @MrJohndl

    To a certain extent, we understand physical biology, yes. But it is laughable to say that mainstream medicine has a lock on all healing tools and energies available and nothing remains undiscovered. Again, not long ago lasers were the stuff of sci-fi, and the very idea of lasers being used for routine surgery would have been scoffed at by mainstream medicine.

    Oh and btw, the placebo effect remains mind-boggling to mainstream science, simply because it sometimes works...lol

  • @BestofEastWest

    The problem is the word 'energy'. The energy you refer to does not exist. It's nothing more than wishful thinking on your part. Physics explains energy, and the 'healing' energy referred to in alternative therapies is just nonsense. Goodbye.

  • @MrJohndl

    A few decades ago, a huge chunk of today's medical technology would have been laughed at as impossible by traditional medicine. By the actual experience of many, however, there is a powerhouse of energy built into life itself. And actual experience trumps academic theory every time.

  • @BestofEastWest

    Actual experience does not 'trump' anything. People are subjective and unreliable. That is why testing is so important and scientific testing has shown alternative medicine to be nothing more than placebo. The comment about today's technology is completely unrelated to the topic.

  • @MrJohndl The body itself breaks down food that derived its energy from the sun, the energy in our bodies are from calories(solar energy in our bodies, we give off energy constantly in thermal form..look at thermal cameras). Without calories our bodies can't repair cells from this anorexic people often live shorter lives. The process of pranic healing is to accelerate bodily repair through stimulation of brain chemicals, chemicals that contribute to immune response, &cell repair.

  • @dasoliss

    More mumbo jumbo....give it a rest.

  • @MrJohndl When people"don't believe it will work" they get minimal effects since the brain reduces transmission of chemicals such as adopamine(pain reducer), seratonin(endocrine system/immune stimulant)&other chemicals. This doesn't merely scratch the surface of everything that goes on with this practice micro-biologically. Pranic healing isn't really nonsense, it's an ancient form of healing that needs to be scientifically understood.(not debating, just info w/ current medical data).

  • @dasoliss

    Well, you're half right. The placebo effect is linked with the release of chemicals. That's all that is going on though.

  • @MrJohndl

    That release of chemicals clearly works in tandem with something else, something outside of the spectrum of what can thus far be quantified by today's science.

    But you're right, as dasoliss pointed out as well, "People [e.g. scientists] are subjective and unreliable". That's true even for scientific research that doesn't veer off into realms that are currently off the radar screen of what's acceptable. With a strong enough bias, especially borne of dogma, results will get skewed.

  • @BestofEastWest

    Oh dear....you just aren't getting it. There is nothing else - only the material universe. Scientists must publish their findings, and are quickly discredited if they are wrong. That is how science progresses. That's it for me, I can't waste any more time trying to educate you. If you're so anti-scientific in your thinking, turn off the computer.

  • @MrJohndl

    Though it obviously has its positive side, the peer review process works like a filter, blocking out any conclusions that don't conform to the strictly held assumptions and dogmas of the day. Whatever the evidence.

    And very, very, very few scientists will have the courage to risk losing their share of the funding, the life-blood of today's research: government grants.

  • @BestofEastWest

    Over time, the peer review process works brilliantly. You don't seem to have any faith at all in the scientific endeavour. I find this puzzling considering you enjoy using technology. Science is the only method we have that leads us to real knowledge. Everything else is just opinion. Trust the science.

  • @MrJohndl

    That's an argument aimed at the wind. We're discussing the dogmas, the fashions, the limitations that currently plague mainstream science -- not science as a whole.

  • @MrJohndl "You don't seem to have any faith at all in the scientific endeavour."

    Yeah, that's the point.

  • @BestofEastWest Nah, that's not how it works. Most scientists would give their right hand to find conclusive evidence that would destroy a widely held belief. Unfortunately some people would give up their bullshit detection abilities too.

  • @EdsEnemy

    Not true, not at all. What you're saying 'sounds' logical, yes, but it's not how academia actually works. Today's academic establishment guards its core assumptions very carefully. And any conclusion that contradicts one of those assumptions is met with ridicule, contempt, even outrage. Every time.

  • @BestofEastWest "Today's academic establishment guards its core assumptions very carefully" What do you base this on?

  • @totheman

    No study will survive the peer review process if it draws a conclusion seriously at odds with the groupthink of mainstream science. In fact, it's worse than that. Few if any scientists will even venture into such territory in the first place. Understandable, of course. Why risk sabotaging your career?

  • @BestofEastWest Again, just repeating your original comment without providing any evidence to support your position, doesn't answer my question, what do you base your position on?

  • @totheman

    That's like asking why so few Germans were critical of Hitler. Though nobody's going to cart the critics of atheism off to death camp, everybody knows what will happen to a scientist of any field, whatever his qualifications, if he dares to conclude that life is more than purely physical.

    Richard Sternberg, former editor of a respected science journal, was personally and professionally harassed simply for allowing one such heretical article through the peer review process. Wow

  • @BestofEastWest "nobody's going to cart the critics of atheism off to death camp," This isn't about atheism. "everybody knows what will happen to a scientist" Obviously not, since you haven't provided any evidence to support your position. "through the peer review process" Yes, because if you claim to be a scientist, then your don't go through the scientific process of peer review, I imagine you would get called out. He wasn't called out because of his conclusions as you implied.

  • @totheman

    Please read my comment again.

    Atheism is a belief system, a religious faith that pre-supposes an utter lack of metaphysical (other-than-physical) reality. Regardless of evidence.

    Atheism dictates that all evidence MUST be explained by a cause that is purely physical and philosophically meaningless.

    A cult of atheism dominates science nowadays, and it has zero tolerance for dissent. That cult is what ambushed Sternberg and so effectively trashed his career.

  • @BestofEastWest "a religious faith" No, since it doesn't make a positive claim, but, in your attempts to divert from your original position, which was "No study will survive the peer review process if it draws a conclusion seriously at odds with the groupthink of mainstream science" You have yet to demonstrate where this has happened.

    "cult is what ambushed Sternberg " Sternberg didn't go through the peer review process, that's why people complained.

  • @totheman

    Don't make me laugh. Atheism can't escape what it is: a strongly held belief system, a religious faith in the ultimate human condition. Interesting, though, how the cult of Atheism loves to set itself far above the rest of humanity's believers. At no age, at no level of education does a student or a scientist acquire the right to criticize its sacred teachings...lol

    Oh and Sternberg was acting within his role as editor when he put that article through peer review. PR happened.

  • @BestofEastWest "Atheism can't escape what it is" Still backing up your original claim I see. " religious faith in the ultimate human condition", like I say, atheism doesn't make a positive assertion. "Oh and Sternberg was acting within his role as editor" actually "Contrary to typical editorial practices, the paper was published without review by any associate editor; Sternberg handled the entire review process.". Peer review requires more than one person.

  • @totheman

    Ah yes, Atheists get to redefine English. Nothing about "positive assertion" in the definition of religion. And yet, it really needs that extra bit of self-serving gobbledygook. Otherwise Atheism won't qualify as the only religious belief sanctioned by the US constitution. Can't have that.

  • @totheman

    You're misunderstanding the Sternberg heresy scandal. As editor, Sternberg merely ok'd Dr. Meyer's article for peer review. The actual reviewers, generally 3 or more of Meyer's 'peers', had no idea who authored the article. And therein lies the problem: The article got appraised for its scientific credibility alone. Naturally enough, the cult of Atheism cried foul.

  • @BestofEastWest I would be open to consider this a possibility, but I would need more than your side of things to understand what happened, do you have a article or something? Ideally from a neutral source?

  • @totheman

    Please google peer review, look up 'religion' in the dictionary, then read my comments again.

    Merry Christmas!

  • @BestofEastWest "Atheists get to redefine English" No, it has nothing to do with words being redefined, maybe you think that because you don't know

    what they mean. What is meant by the term positive assertion, is when someone

    makes a claim to the existence of something, in this case, the thiests making

    the claim of the existence of a diety.

    A negative assertion, ie atheism, which is predicated on the lack of evidence

    on behalf of the positive assertion made by the thiests, ie god exists.

  • @BestofEastWest There really is nothing esoteric about it, I will assume also that you have no evidence to back up your original position aswell.

  • @BestofEastWest "No study will survive the peer review process if it draws a conclusion seriously at odds with the groupthink of mainstream science."

    This has happened several times in the past and will probably happen again once we find something strange like wave-particle duality, or general relativity, or something along those lines.

    And it'll be great, because it'll allow us to make even more accurate predictions about the way the universe works.

  • @BestofEastWest undsci.berkeley.edu/article/ba­sic_assumptions

    Guarded carefully are they? Well I guess they need better security.

  • Comment removed

  • @MrJohndl you say this coz, you dont know science well. There are thousands of things in science cant be explained.! one example is measurement problem in atomic level. science is just over 300 yrs old infant.! which is totally depend on our senses. I don't know abt this particular video but have experienced really beyond belief, Just DON'T TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU DON'T KNOW..!

  • @BestofEastWest Just noticed the raging war.! lol.. Have you heard this..? "Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" Just leave this now..!

  • It's not that I believe this, I just find it strangely relaxing.

  • @Assclownery same here

  • Even if it works like a placebo, in that case no difference. A lot of healing comes from within the mind anyway, what does it matter how one arrives

  • Pranic healing has changed my life and my patients. I practice acupuncture, herbal medicine, and tuina in a whole different light now because of this practice. Much gratitude!

  • It also looks like he maybe using Reiki symbols but I could be wrong...

  • It's a mixture of some type of alcohol, tea tree oil, & lavender. Akin to what the perfume factory workers used that kept them from getting the bubonic plague. Pranic healers use the blue triangle inner purification technique & powerful twin hearts meditation. This is elements of that.

  • Master Stephen Co's Prosperity Meditation benefited me immensely. Wonder if he can accept an energy exchange to bless my Pranic Crystal remotely and maybe even give distant healing. Wonder how much it might cost.

    Many thanks and Atma Namaste Master Stephen Co

  • Comment removed

  • Are they using salt water, in the spray bottle?

  • He does this so well it ALMOST looks like it's completely fucking imaginary and fake. But we know it isn't.

  • Around 4:10 it looks like he is stir frying his chakras.

  • At 5:48 he moves when the master pulls out what I understand to be the negative energy, its asif it pulls his spine straight like a string being pulled or something. AMAZING!

  • @Mandoon

    Absolutely amazing, I totally agree. And Master Co will be back at East West this Monday, the 19th. Will put up a clip from his presentation.

  • @Mandoon

    This look more like qi gong healing.

  • @Mandoon Saw that too, glad I wasn't the only one.

  • Comment removed

  • You can call the Pranic Center in Culver and get the info. youre looking for there!

    888 470 5656

  • Where can I get a service done like this in Orange County someone please tell me.

  • Where can I get a service done like this in Orange County

  • great

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more