Well, the name of the work you have uploaded here is Desire.. It is NOT Nuances, period. No matter what the label says. Nemtin was a good friend of mine; I can assure you, stickler for accuracy that he was, that he would not be happy with such mislabeling. Insofar as you know you've labeled the work incorrectly, then why not fix it? It's such a simple thing to correct here, so why don't you?
The work being played here is in fact DESIRE, in a deliciously orchestrated version by Alexander Nemtin. . It is NOT Nuances, an entirely different work
@guirlandes3 On the CD it's written Nuances no. 5. Along with other orchestrated versions of Scriabin's late works (check out the other tracks from this cd.) I perfectly know it's called Desir.
@fisherroastedpeanut Well, the name of the work you have uploaded here is Desir.. It is NOT Nuances, period. No matter what the label says. Nemtin was a good friend of mine; I can assure you, stickler for accuracy that he was, that he would not be happy with suh mislabeling. Insofar as you know you've labeled the work incorrectly, then why not fix it? It's such a simple thing to correct here, so why don't you?
@guirlandes3 Because 1. if I had to rename this video I would have to do the same for all the other ones, and I'm too lazy to do that 2. The actual title of the piece might not be written in the title but it's clearly written in the description box below
3. This is not the actual piano work; Nor is it something that Scriabin himself composed. It is rather a set of orchestral pieces (which are, in fact, meant to be seen as one, single big piece preceding the Mysterium) merely "based" on Scriabin's late opus. And regardless of the fact that whether Nemtin would have approved of such label or not, I think "nuances", or otherwise "shades" or "hues", catpures quite perfectly the atmosphere of these works. Evanescent, colorful yet concise and brief.
@fisherroastedpeanut Scriabin wrote only one single work, entitled "Nuances"; there is nothing to confuse it with, among his own works. I fail to see what teh issue is here. This particular work is simply mislabeled here; it should be re -labeled as "Desire", period. That's all there is to it As I a am a leading authority on the music of Scriabin, endorsed by the Scriabin family, I can assure you I know what I a talking about.
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, the name of the work you have uploaded here is Desire.. It is NOT Nuances, period. No matter what the label says. Nemtin was a good friend of mine; I can assure you, stickler for accuracy that he was, that he would not be happy with such mislabeling. Insofar as you know you've labeled the work incorrectly, then why not fix it? It's such a simple thing to correct here, so why don't you?
guirlandes3 6 months ago
The work being played here is in fact DESIRE, in a deliciously orchestrated version by Alexander Nemtin. . It is NOT Nuances, an entirely different work
guirlandes3 6 months ago
@guirlandes3 On the CD it's written Nuances no. 5. Along with other orchestrated versions of Scriabin's late works (check out the other tracks from this cd.) I perfectly know it's called Desir.
fisherroastedpeanut 6 months ago
@fisherroastedpeanut Well, the name of the work you have uploaded here is Desir.. It is NOT Nuances, period. No matter what the label says. Nemtin was a good friend of mine; I can assure you, stickler for accuracy that he was, that he would not be happy with suh mislabeling. Insofar as you know you've labeled the work incorrectly, then why not fix it? It's such a simple thing to correct here, so why don't you?
guirlandes3 6 months ago
@guirlandes3 Because 1. if I had to rename this video I would have to do the same for all the other ones, and I'm too lazy to do that 2. The actual title of the piece might not be written in the title but it's clearly written in the description box below
fisherroastedpeanut 6 months ago
3. This is not the actual piano work; Nor is it something that Scriabin himself composed. It is rather a set of orchestral pieces (which are, in fact, meant to be seen as one, single big piece preceding the Mysterium) merely "based" on Scriabin's late opus. And regardless of the fact that whether Nemtin would have approved of such label or not, I think "nuances", or otherwise "shades" or "hues", catpures quite perfectly the atmosphere of these works. Evanescent, colorful yet concise and brief.
fisherroastedpeanut 6 months ago
@guirlandes3 "Nuances" is, of course, not to be confused with the homonym Op. 56 no. 3 "Nuances".
fisherroastedpeanut 6 months ago
@fisherroastedpeanut Scriabin wrote only one single work, entitled "Nuances"; there is nothing to confuse it with, among his own works. I fail to see what teh issue is here. This particular work is simply mislabeled here; it should be re -labeled as "Desire", period. That's all there is to it As I a am a leading authority on the music of Scriabin, endorsed by the Scriabin family, I can assure you I know what I a talking about.
guirlandes3 6 months ago
Where can I buy this whole CD
Kalen1457 2 years ago