Added: 3 years ago
From: rattansifan
Views: 14,630
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (102)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The US is the richest nation in the world. Not Monaco or Luxembourg. This is why the US is the global money how do you think people trade with different currencies? You trade your money through the US. The US will not decline. All nations go through ruts like the US economic going down right now. One way to get out of the debt is producing more products. This works great for war. Your making products and people have jobs. The economy will go up. Unless the US wants to pick a fight with China?IDK

  • @fRoMeThEwEs

    How do you consider a country who's deficit 14 trillion and climbing the richest country in the world. You shouldn't just look at one side of the numbers. You have to take everything into account.

    The only reason the dollar "was" the standard for the world currency is because the deal that was made with the Saudi's in the past.

    Now countries are dumping their dollars because its worthless. Saddam wanted to use the Euro and not the dollar so America made up rumors and attacked him

  • @fRoMeThEwEsT

    War does make money, but only for the rich who already have their hand in the pot. As you can see the U.S. has been at war for 10 years now and the economy has declined each year.

    The same thing happen with Rome. When you over extend yourself with to many things you don't take care of what needs to be the first priority.

    And trust that the U.S. wants no part with China. The U.S. only goes after armies they can beat easily. Usually brown countries.

  • All over the world there are literally tens of millions of families who are victims of western terror one way or another. 

  • Largest military. The Russian and the Chinese army outnumber ours by far. Also, half of the 1.3 million American in service were National Guards called to service to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. While, Russia, China, and India both have 1.3 million troops in service and are not involve in any major conflict. Russia is fighting rebels in its Southern Federal States.

  • funny america says it's a free and fair country but at the same time they spend like 4,5% of the gdp on military while europe for ex spends only 1,5% ,isn't that a simple sign that us is a militarized country ? why would you spend so much of your gdp if you don't want to take advantage of the army?

  • what are we gonna do if north korea and south korea fight?

    is they UN gonna help them w/o america?

  • THINK about if you legalize pot just in california ,well all the pot heads would move there which would cause other states recover finnacially and in productivity but to make it legal everywhere then crime will increase everywhere and so would state costs , as for the military you just need to look at the soldiers , the temptations and the costs

  • Comment removed

  • If America wants to be part of the club it needs to get its ass kicked. Other nations have oppressed each other throughout centuries. We know what it is to have our cities bombed, our women raped and men hanged. America hadn't yet become independent and it already wanted to conquer Canada, lol. You can't make war without knowing what it feels like, you know.

  • @HelenaXVI umm American people were oppressed learn our history..

  • america wants to be like all other great nations , they want an empire and anyway , they're preparing for ww3 so , ya , america is fucked and so is europe, we're all dead , they'll kill us all

  • Our contry is ricoulous, we spend 600 billions a year on military, if we spent 200 billons, we would still be the 1st military, and we could have free health and education

  • the cia has been killing hope and democracy since the end of ww2.

  • The US military power is unlimited, their whole Military Industrial Complex is fully intact, they have access to huge resources and also a huge Nuclear Arsenal. Being broke is just a money issue.

  • The US won the Korean war, the purpose was to defeat the North Korean invasion of South Korea; the US lost the war to reunify the North and South because of MacArthur's mad scheme to invade China.

  • @me8825,,you are wrong dude..look at the mexican is invading you hehehe

  • am and AMERICAN, I AM AGAINST ALL WAR. AND THIS USVS. THEM IS JUST A BULLSHIT STORY. THE RICH CAN ALWAYS HIRE HALF THE POOR TO KILL THE OTHER HALF.

  • any way to go ,dead.

  • The US does not have the largest army on Earth and the US is not bankrupt so this video is fundamentally incorrect.

  • It's funny that even after loosing more than a 132000 men in korean war, Chinese still claim victory. Us lost just about 50 thousand. If i add the wounded chinese lost about 400K and Us around132K. This is 1:3 ratio in favor of US.

    Indians avenged their loss in 1965 Chola incident when PLA dare not escalate the issue.Chinese are just good at putting up a nice show.

    Kids, when the first bullet leaves the barrel, all the plans go for a toss and only the brave survive.Chinese are a joke at best

  • Chan, an just most Americans you completely forgot about the multitude of nations who also faught in Korea under the UN mandate, much the same as Americans only list US casualties versus NVA/VC casualties from the Vietnam War...

    Regards,

    Crimson

  • @Chandrabhan75 would you know a chinese person if you were in the same room? because we must share the planet.

  • I know xenophobic chinese . I can smell the yellow han from some distance. They had been bitches of Japs for long. Fundamentally Japs also belong to the same race.

    Chinese are palanoid peepul. Empellol Hu must appllove everything including sharing planet. When are you guys planning to claim America. Few chinese spat thele too. Jokers

  • War isn't about killing, it's about achieving the objective intended through violence.

    US's objective in Korea War was to eliminate North Korea. China's objective in Korea War was to defend North Korea's survival.

    China obviously accomplished its goal in the war, US didn't.

    And every historian and military analyst would agree that India was the worse off between the two during the Sino-India conflict.

  • @devilhunterred

    "US's objective in Korea War was to eliminate North Korea."- no, its objective was to defend South Korea from North Korea after North Korea invaded South Korea. The United States was not the aggressor. Neither side lost, the war's end was mutual.

  • China is bankrupt? Who'd have guessed?

  • Your stupidity amazes me. Chinas army is shit. They have less then 50,000 trained troops the rest are similair in training to the US national guard

  • @me8825

    Are you simply being a troll or are you geniunely a retard?

    watch?v=OXtZLz9smuU

    Watch how US marines couldn't cope with the obstacle course of PLA.

    And don't forget that Chinese is the only force in the world that has defeated US twice in history, once directly in the Korean War and second time indirectly in Vietnam War.

  • No retard no ones ever had a ground invasion on the US.

  • I never said they did.

    But US lost both the Korea War and Vietnam War, which meant the other side apparently had won.

  • @devilhunterred What about Somalia and Iran, and Cuba

  • Yes true, US also had major operation failure in those regions.

    But they weren't major wars, so I will be nice and let them go :P

  • Fair Enough

  • the north always win lol.

  • I know lol.

    N.Korea vs. S.Korea

    N.Vietnam vs. S.Vietnam

    N.Americans vs. S.Americans in US Civil War.

    N.Nationalists vs. S.Republicans in Spanish Civil War.

    History repeatedly proved that if you want to win in a war, fight as the northern side.

  • @devilhunterred lol i got examples.

    only in a civil war. lol

  • look at the globe upside down and your good

  • you have to be a dumbass to believe that, we never fully invaded vietnam because of politics, and our K/D ratio there was like 20:1, we won that, no matter what america has improved in military standings since then, look how well trained and equipped our military is now

  • Real life war isn't Call of Duty, victory isn't determined by KD ratio and how many men you have killed, it is determined by who achieved their objective.

    US objective in the Vietnam war was to protect South Vietnam and destroy the communist leadership in North Vietnam.

    NVA's objective in the war was to push out the US forces and conquer South Vietnam.

    Guess who won in the end?

    And I wouldn't brag about how "well trained" US troops are.

    Watch this video on youtube: /watch?v=OXtZLz9smuU

  • @devilhunterred Viêt Cong was supported by the USSR, certainly not by the hereditary chinese foe...

  • USSR provided much of the hardware, mostly tanks, rockets, anti-air defense systems, etc.

    China was the provider of virtually all the small arms that NVA and Vietcongs were using, including the AK47s.

    China also sent special guerrilla warfare advisers to train the officers of the NVA, which in return train their Vietcong operatives.

  • China lost 20,000 of its troops in a 4months invasion of Vietnam in the early 80s. They then retreated but never admitt ed that Vietnam had over powered them.

  • chinese robots

  • lol if we go down, make no mistake we take everybody down with us

  • You couldn't take us down. Infact, it's been proven that without the USA, Canada's economy would Skyrocket and be one of the top G-5

  • at least you are funny

  • ...we export most of our products to the U.S which means without them, we'd be screwed.

  • canada would roll over in 3 days, thats about how long it would take for an offensive from our east coast to blow through quebec, toronto winsor all of your large neighboring cities. luckily for you though, we like you french fries and gravy eatin sons a bitches lol

  • fresh article posted today on Politico :

    Pentagon preps for economic warfare

    politico . com/news/stories/0409/21053 . html

    'The war game demonstrated that in post-Sept. 11 world, the Pentagon is thinking about a wide range of threats to Americas position in the world, including some that could come far from the battlefield.'

  • Aryans,China,Russia will never let a acountry like USA built on gay /lesbian mentality and built on slavering women and men to be superpiwer.

  • USA built on gay lesbian mentality ? lol man. You ever been here? Definitely not even friendly to gays, lesbian is different who hates lesbians!? lol

  • forgot India bro !!

  • I dont think there will be a decline, the US is an enourmously wealthy nation but its concentrated at the top which is deliberate; same goes for the debt - engineered by the Reaganites to keep the government from being potentially democratic. The powerful can fix this all just as easily.

    On the other hand the current situation makes it much more dangerous and unpredictable much like a wounded animal, needing to lash out to reestablish 'credibility'.

  • wtf is this idiot talkig about

  • FreedomsPatriot; I dont know why someone flagged your comment as spam; as far as I can see you are expressing your view and you should be to do so. I do not say I agree with what you say, but I think you should be able to make yourself heard. We are not all Jews like you!

  • "FreedomsPatriot; I dont know why someone flagged your comment as spam;"

    The truth really screws most ignorant morons up.

    "We are not all Jews like you! "

    I am not Jewish, and the WTF do they have to do with anything?

  • FreedomsPatriot ; I thought you were a Jew because only Jews support anything that USA does because USA pays Israel lots of money! If you are not a Jew then why do you oppose the closer of the USA military bases? Would you like French or German having military bases in your country? That is a big insult to any nation to host another countries military on its soil! It is even worse than prostitution!

  • No problem here, good luck with the Russians.

  • jajjajajaajja, all whe have to do its to sale our old W.M.Ds, to the little brown people ! and fuck you up whit !! HARRP. !!

  • disordermate; you want to kill us with a musical instrument! In that case I am going to buy a flute because I can stick it in you ass first and then kill you with it!

  • you are a dumb fuck, HAARP, read and inform you self before you make an ass of you self in the net, ignorance like yours its the reazon king salomon treasure belong to the germans

  • disordermate; if you read and inform yourself you will find that Haarp is actually an Iranian instrument invented over 2000 years ago! But I also bought a few flutes just incase!

  • i do not belive every person from iran its as dumb fuck like yours self. so im gona just live it as it is.

  • disordermate;

    You had 3 spelling errors in a short sentence! I assure you no Iranian is as dumb as you! We go to good schools!

  • Anyone who believes HAARP is a weapon has NO understanding of science. Whatsoever. My physics prof would have failed me if I was a gullible fringe theorist tard who held to that nonsense.

  • the usa is going down. the usa is broke, so right about now i suggest every get ready for world war 3. we are about to take over.

  • I hope the jews stomp your ass, AGAIN!

  • FreedomsPatriot; you can hope anything you wish but that is all you can do. The last two wars with Israel showed us the way forward.

  • "it ain't rocket science" You're one to talk. :)

  • fucking liberals. all these people are suffering from wishful thinking. the only way the US military is going to decline is if it gets cut down in a hail of bombs and bullets. and that won't happen either.

  • My dear fanciful dreamer. The U.S. Army and all the other branches is going under a hail of inflated dollars and useless expenditures. When the cataclysm of Mexicification hits (which I welcome) and the further deterioration of the U.S. economic base, along with revolution within, will end, like Rome ended with a massive stripping of the bullshit empire. You are a fanciful idiot of dinosaur version thinking. The U.S. has no clearcut victories, ever since its WWII era, mainly, thanks to Russia.

  • "all these people are suffering from wishful thinking"...and juntas and deaths squads and crippling debts and export-based economies, and et cetera

  • William Blum's book Killing Hope is an excellent historical resource, and the perfect holiday gift to an Obama supporter.

  • exactly, because there in no hope with liberals running the government.

  • Perhaps if we subscribe to the tribalistic caveman paranoia of conservitards, and their manufactured air of righteous indignation over being stopped from their reign of anti-scientific and inhumane dogma.

  • Being a caveman isn't so bad, as long as you don't subscribe to notions of ethnocentrism..... And being conservative in light of variables that harbor notions of socialism is not exactly a bad thing, you just have to use common sense when applicating an administration of free handouts to wanton derelicts. ... and generalizations when it comes to Christians.... is kinda unfair, I mean... why should they tolerate when nobody tolerates them? Existential anxiety? nevermind, I am out of space.

  • Not this fucking preposterous myth that "Christians are not tolerated". Last polls indicated that 55% percent of Americans believe the earth is less than 6000 years old. Christians in America are the MAJORITY. It is THEY who do the oppressing.

  • you dont know what the book is about do you?

  • There is nothing wrong with being a liberal, and a certain level of socialism is ok, however it must not be regulated by huge governmental entities that suck funds down like a prostitute named hoover. however wishing for that is like hoping for a benevolent dictator named Castro...... next thing you know we'll have to register ammunition, in addition to our weapons AND ourselves.... and who said sacrificing freedoms for security was a bad idea..... Ah Thomas Jefferson.

  • The US should stop its military program.

    The 2nd amendment and local militias is enough to take care of America.

    Neither McCain nor Obama are getting rid of the military industrial complex.

  • @asperin God that's possibly the most moronic statement i've seen on youtube yet...

  • @randomhero4u69

    I'm not God and I don't know what comment you are referring to.

  • @asperin hell no, that will never be considered. the budget should go down at the least but having it completely shut down, thats just fucking stupid.

  • @rapehitler

    Stupid? For you.

    For me it is not.

    If you want to give voluntarily, you should, I don't want to give, wanna force me to? Want to force me to fund your wars?

    I'm not forcing you to pay for something I want to get done, why do you people force others to pay for things you want? And y'all not even the majority, you just have monopoly power on violence. Thousands of thugs and guns.

    That's some medieval shit.

  • @asperin yeah, lets shut down the military program and lets shut down intelligence gathering too while were at it. in other words, lets just go totally defenseless and powerless just to save a few hundred billion bucks. i said what SHOULD be considered is lowering the military budget, but completely shutting it down is just plain retarded. no military superpower would do that, no matter how bad the financial crisis is.

  • @rapehitler

    You still think we live in the early 1900s.

    Look at your name, "rapehitler". He's dead, get over it.

    You're obsessed with fear of invasion and ignore the fact that a strong national military is not needed to prevent invasion like it happens with wealthy states like Lichtenstein, Monaco, Cyprus, Qatar & others, that are smaller than most US states.

    Have your strong subsidized military, on your state, let other states decide what they want. Federal govt armies fail at bringing peace.

  • @asperin "hes dead, get over it" lol @ you pointing out my obviously retarded username. you know your argument fails when you start pointing out unrelated things to cover it up. a strong military IS in fact necessary to "prevent" invasion. the reason those "wealthy" countries were invaded is because they all have incapable/weak military power to kick them out. I get what your saying, but I'd rather the US in general remains prepared.

  • @rapehitler

    Those wealthy states were not invaded, if you're talking about their territorial history of invasion then you might as well include the US when it was invaded before it was the US.

    A strong military does not prevent invasion either, it attempts to keep the territorial monopoly alive and most of the time expand.

  • @asperin right. before it was the US, therefor before it had a powerful military. the US actually has reasons to be invaded, that is why we need a capable enough military to eradicate foreign presence in the US as a result of an invasion. simply having "the largest army on earth", as this video cites in the title, alone is enough to "prevent" invasion. and yes, I understand that. that's why I put "prevent" in double-quotes.

  • @rapehitler

    No one will invade the US. Commerce doesn't allow it. We are a world united by the market and when you hurt someone with a lot of economic allies you are closing doors on yourself.

    The countries that have recently invaded others are countries that hold a monopoly on many of the service and through political power they are trying to impose themselves as the economic regulators of the world.

    Watch Stefbot's new video, it's also featured on my channel.

  • @asperin Well such a large military budget is not doing any good for the US deficit (you need it to keep the petrol $ secure) although you are just a tad deluded if you think 'the 2nd amendment and local militias is enough to take care of America' matey. I'm afraid pea shooters are not going to defend you against thermo nuclear weapons, cruise missiles, air power, armour etc etc lol

  • old people suck, they set all this up, and now they are like i wish it wasn't so, wtf. perhaps you should have done something, it ain't rocket science.

  • They have too many years being conditioned, they are the section of society with the most pessimism and denial, and the older the worst.

    Without generalizing though.

    And their example of submission to unauthorized authorities should never be followed.

    Imitation leads to learning, but with those people imitation only leads to a wrong path.

  • yea well they annoy the shit out of me, and they act all holy, and pretend to know it all. also no one over 55 should ever be president, ever. they should collect their social security and watch from the sidelines.

  • Some of us "old people" have been trying to warn our fellow old people for over 30 years. We have been derided as the "black helicopter tinfoil hat wearing paranoid wackos" for decades. I personally knew we were phukd when we didn't drag Reagan and Bush Sr out on the Capital Mall and execute them in 1987 during "Iran/Contra" "controversy" (TREASON).

    Welcome to the police state we tried to get the sheep to wake up to 30 years ago.

  • sorry i shouldn't have said old people, but i mean come on. there had to have been many chances to avoid this type of crime, if certain older people had spoken up or intervened and had a back bone, i don't know call me crazy.

  • There were many things achieved during the political movements of the past, such as the Freedom of Information Act (unfortunately now effectively void) and the Church Committee hearings. Still, information control has kept the reality of who controls society largely secret. Only some of the lines of power have been exposed. For example, the Council on Foreign Relations has been shown to largely control US policy. But what about Masonic and Zionist influence and other more obscure groups?

  • thank you so much for posting this video, keep working with proper news for us all.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more