Occasionally things will fall into place without you doing anything and two steps will be completed at once, at which point you can skip the unneeded step. You will always have either one or all four in place. It is impossible to have only two or three squares in place.
I don't claim to be an expert on this topic. This is A way to solve it, I am absolutely certain that there are better ways but this is the only one I know and it works.
Great tutorial, but you forgot to explain the notation. And the last layer is WAY too complicated. The bbeginner layer by layer is the best. I'm probably going to use that method for solving layer 1 though. It's fun :)
Sweet! It worked the first time thru for me! This is so much easier! You said it may be slower but for me it's much faster because I never could even memorize Rubik's 8 (or 10 maybe) patterns you had to remember. Thanks a ton!!
Ok when you were explaining MOVE 1 you mention that "sometimes there are more than 1 in the right place" and thats what ive got, they are right across from each other. Now when i do MOVE 1 on one of them it jsut switches the ones int he right place around but never gets all 4. Am I doing something wrong?
I'm not quite sure what your issue is from your description. Sometimes using this method the cube will just happen to fall so that when you compete one step the next is already done too. For instance when trying to first PLACE the pieces they just happen to end up ORIENTED at the same time. Is that what happened?
man i wish i have an original rubiks cube 'cause the local ones are hard to turn and sometimes get stuck
hey can you make a vid with the 4 squares rubiks? cause im not really gud with any of them, all i have is the 4 square rubiks and i suck at it lol
thanks all your vid are really helpful and enjoyable, you should get a reward for this hahaha
onuris04 3 years ago
what if both are in the right place at the beginning
porkypigbig50 3 years ago
Occasionally things will fall into place without you doing anything and two steps will be completed at once, at which point you can skip the unneeded step. You will always have either one or all four in place. It is impossible to have only two or three squares in place.
magicalmaniac77 3 years ago
your way is crap
pogobat's way is so much easier and faster
VideoGamesKickAss 3 years ago
I don't claim to be an expert on this topic. This is A way to solve it, I am absolutely certain that there are better ways but this is the only one I know and it works.
magicalmaniac77 3 years ago
Great tutorial, but you forgot to explain the notation. And the last layer is WAY too complicated. The bbeginner layer by layer is the best. I'm probably going to use that method for solving layer 1 though. It's fun :)
Pizzscn 3 years ago
Sweet! It worked the first time thru for me! This is so much easier! You said it may be slower but for me it's much faster because I never could even memorize Rubik's 8 (or 10 maybe) patterns you had to remember. Thanks a ton!!
NathanFincher 4 years ago
never mind my question i figured out what i did wrong, i skipped a step and it messed me up. But i got it now.
TheCarter730 4 years ago
Ok when you were explaining MOVE 1 you mention that "sometimes there are more than 1 in the right place" and thats what ive got, they are right across from each other. Now when i do MOVE 1 on one of them it jsut switches the ones int he right place around but never gets all 4. Am I doing something wrong?
TheCarter730 4 years ago
i love you jajaj
thanks it worked for me
luichisin 4 years ago
OMG THat final worked on my umpteenth try!!!
it took me 5 houres but i got it!!!!!
myflyisopen2 4 years ago
woohoo just got it!
md10201 4 years ago
worked for me thanks.
Shawty901 4 years ago
idk... your method workd its just i think somehting very rare happend and for some reason my bottom got solved very early
but i got it
thanks a million
19Spencer91 4 years ago
hmm... when i went to "part 3"
my bottom layer "yellow" was already solved
and on the faces only one square was wrong on each face
how could i fix that situation?
19Spencer91 4 years ago
I'm not quite sure what your issue is from your description. Sometimes using this method the cube will just happen to fall so that when you compete one step the next is already done too. For instance when trying to first PLACE the pieces they just happen to end up ORIENTED at the same time. Is that what happened?
magicalmaniac77 4 years ago
yeah, it seems like it
19Spencer91 4 years ago
thanks a lot! im seriously going to go buy one now =)
19Spencer91 4 years ago
im gona go but a cube now :P
nomis69 4 years ago