@tinafanforlife73 you have reached the new level of being gullible. you believe NASA lies in this video. do you realize anybody can make a video disclaiming something just to make publicity. but people like you fall for it. there will always be a person or two to fall for the stupidest possible video. here's a tip, there's a tunnel under your basement, see the light, go through it, and learn stuff
Each rover has a stereo pair of PanCams mounted 280 mm apart. To make their panoramas, many pictures are joined together to form a mosaic. Each has a filter wheel in front with 8 positions for filtering various wavebands covering the sensitivity range of the CCD. These allow multi-spectral imaging for quantitative geological and atmospheric analysis. 30 photos between 2 cameras of this series.
Looks like the rover has photographed an outcropping of Tertiary lignite. Martians are notoriously protective of their lignite so it seems natural that it would be sequestered.
Could somebody please tell me what I'm supposed to be looking at? The narrator is speaking too fast and is not making himself clear. Are we supposed to be looking at the crater? What is different?
as spam Reply | Spam Go to the mars rover website and download those four photos for yourself. Then open them in MS paint and do a flood fill on the blank patches. In a normal JPG or PNG image, the flood will only fill a very small area. On those pics, the entire area is flooded. CCD cameras cannot produce that result; the image has been edited.
The description should be changed since its faked!
Go to the mars rover website and download those four photos for yourself. Then open them in MS paint and do a flood fill on the blank patches. In a normal JPG or PNG image, the flood will only fill a very small area. On those pics, the entire area is flooded. CCD cameras cannot produce that result; the image has been edited.
spot on, well researched. Also, if you haven't already (which i doubt) check out 'disclosure project', and 'tom flanders'. The latter is a doctor who has researched mars surface for decades. You will grind your teeth out of curiosity once you've seen his discoveries 0_0
Not all of those photos were faked. The only obvious fake photos I have seen so far is the ones shown on NASA sites and television. Everything they show is so damn RED!!! The photos look like they were 3d animated. They even turned the original mars photos took by Viking red.
The Rovers ARE on movie sets. If you go to an unofficial site you will see a picture that's allegedly taken by the MARS Rover. If you look closely you can just make out Clint Eastwood and John Cusack in the top right-hand corner peering over a ridge.
I went to the official website and looked at the high resolution raw graphics. When you look close as the top of the "ridge" melts away, the top line is sharp and unnaturally jagged. I'm not suggesting NASA edited them (why would they post the photos at all?), I'm suggesting that there was some sort of transmission or reconstruction failure between the rover and earth.
Shorted Sided or Short Sighted? and... uh.. i'll be on the look-out for... er.. uh.. evil putting things in plain "site" so I'm not taken off guard again. *blank look*
What do you mean you don't believe in coincidence? What's the coincidence? Post hoc ergo propter hoc. After the fact, therefore because of the fact. It's a logical trap. Don't fall for it or you'll burn yourself out. There's a lot of nonsense to filter out, and you just might miss the real deal.
governments love conspericy crack pots, they help keep peoples focus away from whats realy going in, and when some one spots a true missinformation its writen off by the public as another crack pot :)
These photos were taken on sol 167 on the Opportunity's mission, while the spacecraft was sitting at a near 30 degree angle in sand. It was in the endurance crater looking back up towards the rim. A little bit of slippage or settling is very possible. Check the website.
Jeromey, I'm not a space enthusiast or anything, so forgive me if this is a stupid question, but what kind of slippage/settling are you talking about?
If the left wheels settled, the image would tilt to the left, as they entire perspective shifted. Indeed, unless logic is totally failing me here, I can't see how any repositioning of the camera, through settling, slipping or otherwise, could occur in a way which caused the top portion to disappear, but leave the lower perspective exactly the same.
Why would NASA send a billion dollar robot to mars when everything is just fake?
AlphiMartino 1 year ago
NASA are liars
tinafanforlife73 1 year ago
@tinafanforlife73 you have reached the new level of being gullible. you believe NASA lies in this video. do you realize anybody can make a video disclaiming something just to make publicity. but people like you fall for it. there will always be a person or two to fall for the stupidest possible video. here's a tip, there's a tunnel under your basement, see the light, go through it, and learn stuff
astronomy4you 1 year ago
how about a link to the original photos used in this film?
willease 1 year ago
i belive nasa is freaking shit org... they are keeping all for them, and they give us fakes photos
Missiologo 2 years ago
COLUMBUS Folowed the last 3 days a brighjt light.
Alien make history , not humans that bad
f . ck aliens
wilmex1 2 years ago
Each rover has a stereo pair of PanCams mounted 280 mm apart. To make their panoramas, many pictures are joined together to form a mosaic. Each has a filter wheel in front with 8 positions for filtering various wavebands covering the sensitivity range of the CCD. These allow multi-spectral imaging for quantitative geological and atmospheric analysis. 30 photos between 2 cameras of this series.
PlatinumCodebook 3 years ago
Looks like the rover has photographed an outcropping of Tertiary lignite. Martians are notoriously protective of their lignite so it seems natural that it would be sequestered.
themanyone 3 years ago
Could somebody please tell me what I'm supposed to be looking at? The narrator is speaking too fast and is not making himself clear. Are we supposed to be looking at the crater? What is different?
crackerass01 3 years ago
He's been watching to much of the Wiggles, ps, God bless Steve Irwin and keep sweet!!
jameswolney 3 years ago
Bush and Cheney sent Haliburton to put an oil rig up there I bet. They don't want you to see the martian slaves building it. Goofball
tomboi1978 3 years ago
Shut up Dork
diamonddust22 3 years ago
hmm there is also a posiblility that the image here has also been altered to suit the veiwers @_@
1SavageDragon1 3 years ago
Watch John Lear: UFO Secrets Revealed On youtube your answers are there guys.
Trooper101st 3 years ago
I've been there that crater wall is on a movable theatrical hydraulic axis. That's what your not seeing. Nasa is sneeky aren't they?
diggumsmack2 3 years ago
robotguy Explains its fake
as spam Reply | Spam Go to the mars rover website and download those four photos for yourself. Then open them in MS paint and do a flood fill on the blank patches. In a normal JPG or PNG image, the flood will only fill a very small area. On those pics, the entire area is flooded. CCD cameras cannot produce that result; the image has been edited.
The description should be changed since its faked!
TheBigGameHunter1 4 years ago
fuck off! ufo and alien are real mother fucker!
stingwow 4 years ago
is earth really real
randynicole33 4 years ago 2
are those all fake photos or just da one with the white at the top?
explosion954 4 years ago
Go to the mars rover website and download those four photos for yourself. Then open them in MS paint and do a flood fill on the blank patches. In a normal JPG or PNG image, the flood will only fill a very small area. On those pics, the entire area is flooded. CCD cameras cannot produce that result; the image has been edited.
robotguy 4 years ago
spot on, well researched. Also, if you haven't already (which i doubt) check out 'disclosure project', and 'tom flanders'. The latter is a doctor who has researched mars surface for decades. You will grind your teeth out of curiosity once you've seen his discoveries 0_0
obliviouspet 4 years ago
Activate the reactor
canadaox 4 years ago
Get your ass to Mars.
thosemillersagain 4 years ago 4
Quaidd......
nightflyer28 4 years ago 4
Two Weeeeeeks.....
jokwaz74 3 years ago
@nightflyer28 Cohagen, GIVE DEEZ PEOPEL AIR!
Gromitdog1 1 year ago
haha had me in stitches there for a sec lol !
djnemesisuk 4 years ago
Not all of those photos were faked. The only obvious fake photos I have seen so far is the ones shown on NASA sites and television. Everything they show is so damn RED!!! The photos look like they were 3d animated. They even turned the original mars photos took by Viking red.
GeniusIdiot 4 years ago
FUCK OFF!
EmperorUniverse 4 years ago
life is there is been there -UNDERGROUND-
mexbraz 4 years ago
is been there? BAH!
alissajj 4 years ago
Next thing we'll here is that the rovers aren't on Mars, but are on a movie set, like the moon "hoax" nutcases believe.
sedna69a 4 years ago
The Rovers ARE on movie sets. If you go to an unofficial site you will see a picture that's allegedly taken by the MARS Rover. If you look closely you can just make out Clint Eastwood and John Cusack in the top right-hand corner peering over a ridge.
crackerass01 3 years ago
Sorry, I've got it now! It's the TOP part of the photos that are changed. He confuses things by focusing on the rock in the centre.
crackerass01 3 years ago
Man!
They already have conspiracy theorys of the mars
Rovers!
I guess the 911, UFO, HIV, etc etc
are getting old.
Does Alex Jones know about this
one?
robm1969 4 years ago
Better put on your tinfoil hat before THEY read your mind. Idiot.
flargo 5 years ago
who cares...
Vipernine 5 years ago
I went to the official website and looked at the high resolution raw graphics. When you look close as the top of the "ridge" melts away, the top line is sharp and unnaturally jagged. I'm not suggesting NASA edited them (why would they post the photos at all?), I'm suggesting that there was some sort of transmission or reconstruction failure between the rover and earth.
desspec 5 years ago
Evil puts things in plain site. The way of the evil. Stop being so short sided.
SalonTube 5 years ago
Shorted Sided or Short Sighted? and... uh.. i'll be on the look-out for... er.. uh.. evil putting things in plain "site" so I'm not taken off guard again. *blank look*
desspec 5 years ago
Evil puts things out of sight, hidden, keep secrets, in the dark, lies, corrupt, fake, dishonnest, false promisses, ect, ect.
Za7a7aZ 4 years ago
I don't believe in coincidence!IMO, NASA is following a policy issued 1959..."Brookings report".
markthewatcher 4 years ago
What do you mean you don't believe in coincidence? What's the coincidence? Post hoc ergo propter hoc. After the fact, therefore because of the fact. It's a logical trap. Don't fall for it or you'll burn yourself out. There's a lot of nonsense to filter out, and you just might miss the real deal.
desspec 4 years ago
governments love conspericy crack pots, they help keep peoples focus away from whats realy going in, and when some one spots a true missinformation its writen off by the public as another crack pot :)
glassspider66 4 years ago 3
These photos were taken on sol 167 on the Opportunity's mission, while the spacecraft was sitting at a near 30 degree angle in sand. It was in the endurance crater looking back up towards the rim. A little bit of slippage or settling is very possible. Check the website.
jeromeyward 5 years ago
Jeromey, I'm not a space enthusiast or anything, so forgive me if this is a stupid question, but what kind of slippage/settling are you talking about?
desspec 5 years ago
It was on a really steep slope inside of a crater. It could have slipped or settled down the slope, that would have made the rim look like it moved.
jeromeyward 5 years ago
But wouldn't the perspective of the lower portion of the image change as well?
desspec 5 years ago
Not if only the left set of wheels settled.
jeromeyward 5 years ago
If the left wheels settled, the image would tilt to the left, as they entire perspective shifted. Indeed, unless logic is totally failing me here, I can't see how any repositioning of the camera, through settling, slipping or otherwise, could occur in a way which caused the top portion to disappear, but leave the lower perspective exactly the same.
desspec 5 years ago