phil is like...gazillion times more educated than any of you who created/liked this video...just listen to any of his q & ba post on yt abd you will get my drift.
btw... "no landing on moon" is sooo refuted... leave it at rest, please
Dear maker of this video, have you taken into consideration that are really being rude, not taking no for an answer, forcing yourself on him with a hidden camera and sounding offended that he hasn't taken the time to respond to your particular epiphany. From Plait's perspective he has debated with about 3420 moon hoaxers like you and by the time you come along as nr. 3421 he may just be a bit tired and rather want to have a chat with his pals? Deal with it.
Why do the people who believe we went to the moon think space radiation is no big deal. NASA seems to think so. In fact, NASA says the number one hazard to space travel is radiation, specifically gamma rays and galactic cosmic rays.
@Tweekerhead Galactic cosmic rays are one of the most important barriers standing in the way of plans for interplanetary travel by crewed spacecraft. Galactic cosmic rays (GCR) consist of high energy protons (85%), helium (14%) and other high energy nuclei (HZE). Solar energetic particles consist primarily of protons accelerated by the sun to high energies via proximity to solar flares and coronal mass ejections. You should stop with your bad science.
@Daddyo930 Bad science? Coming from a guy who said"1rad=62.4x106MeV" or that the Magnetosphere stops gamma rays, you aren't in any position to tell anyone about science, especially me.
You are very wrong about the composition of GCR's, where'd you get your information?
Mine comes from the Fly's Eye Obs.Utah,I have a friend there.
@Tweekerhead You should stop. As a matter of fact we will until you answer this question. Are you familiar with remote viewing? You seem desperate to not answer the question.
@Tweekerhead You should stop. As a matter of fact we will until you answer this question. Are you familiar with remote viewing? You seem desperate to not answer the question. I don't mind asking the question a million times. Is there something your afraid of?
Lol, make a video wherein you try to interview someone who turns you down on account of your taking quotes out of context and stitching together non-sequiturs, reply that you in fact do not, and then proceed to do just that. What credibility do you think you have left?
Science tells us that we never went to the moon. Catalogue of LDE flares (January 1969 - March 1986) differential rotation of the Sun during the period 1921-1971. page 96. page 82 for descriptions of chart on 96. Apollo 12, launched during a solar flare. There is no way astronauts can fly through M6 and X4 class solar flares.
@receiver69 Your an idiot, there are scientists that think the moon landing was a fraud, and as more others, they won't say because of the damn government.
Science is a language, it's a way of thinking, it's a common agreement on applying logic and hard work to gain knowledge.
Jarrah White demonstrated himself that he isn't even capable of doing basic mathematic calculations. He's not interested in learning, he just thinks he'll become famous by imitating Ralph Rene.
Phil Plait is right: There's no use talking to someone who doesn't even speak the same language. It's a waste of time.
Achso, wer nur laut genug WISSENSCHAFT brüllt, hat also recht? Und wer sich wie Jarrah die Mühe macht den ganzen Mondlandeschwachsinn zu hinterfragen, ist deiner Welt ein Dummkopf?
Nein dumm sind nur die Verschwörungs-Spinner, die sich gerne eine gruselige Phantasiewelt herbeiträumen wollen und denen es schon ausreicht, wenn sie etwas nicht auf Anhieb verstehen, um "VERSCHWÖRUNG" zu brüllen.
Dumm ist es, wenn man sich dermaßen an seine Vorstellungen klammert, dass man jede Antwort ignoriert, die einen davon abbringen würde.
Was würde dich denn überzeugen, dass du falsch liegst? Menschen die LERNEN, ändern jeden Tag ein bisschen ihre Weltsicht.
@AndreasZ05 Ich habe zwar nur eine Klippschule besucht, aber meine technische, naturwissenschaftliche und medienphilosophische Bildung reicht vollkommen aus, um die Mondlandung als eine reine von der NASA kreierte Illusion zu erkennen. Dieser Freimauerverein NASA ist selbst nach über 40 Jahren noch nicht in der Lage die Mondlandung mit Aufnahmen zu verifizieren. Stattdessen kommen hier einige Mondlandeshirnis und pissen Mondlandekritiker ans Bein, in dem sie als Antisemiten bezeichnet werden.
I'd never call anyone an anti-semite without good reasons, and "deadlyradiation" alias "WhiteJarrah" has a YouTube friend called "JewsJewsJewsJewsJews" who, just as the name suggests, is a genuine anti-semite.
That is what I call a fact. I know you guys don't bother much about facts as soon as they don't fit in your little fairy-tales.
@AndreasZ05 So anyone who uses word "jews" is an anti-semite? Maybe he just likes jews very much? Maybe he is even jew himself? Who's an anti-semite then?
no, this guy didn't name his channel "jewsjewsjewsjewsjews" because he likes jews very much, and I'm really sure because he featured videos about "jews did 911" and jewish-conspiracy stuff like that. As I said before, I wouldn't call anyone an anti-semite without a good reason, because it's a serious thing, guess we both agree on that one.
Look at you, although you don't have any information about me, you say that I was "self-hating" and had been "raped" by someone.
It is obvious to anyone with brains that you are attacking you own self picture that you're projecting onto me. You are the one who has been hurt or even raped in the past, which, by the way, is the only explanation why you would spend his time trying to hurt the feelings of strangers in the internet.
I'm not qualified to help you,but thx for the "pitty"
@schiller2222 You gave a great example of how conspiracy nerds think: Hypothesis 1: Von Braun was a Nazi and a murderer. Let's assume he was a liar as well. Hypothesis 2: NASA didn't go to the moon. Question: How did you get from Hypothesis 1 to Hypothesis 2? Would you believe apollo was real if von Braun hadn't been a Nazi? Do you think because he was a liar that means all the 399999 other guys must have been liars too? Do you think NASA doesn't DESERVE to have made it? How do get along
The only thing that will make you believe is if we took you by the hand there and showed you, even then I bet you would say we put them there just before you got there. I don't blame him for not wanting to talk to nutcases. He is right, you won't listen to the words anyway so what is the point? He has better things to do.
@DutchPetrifiedWood You might as well ignore this twat. I have it on good word that it's a troll, who spends a great deal of time polishing petrified wood in the alley behind a gym populated by gentlemen who prefer the company of each other over womanfolk. And of course this particularly nasty little troll has a large number of sockpuppet accounts it uses to agree with itself. Sad beyond words! Poor little trolls. I wonder how much mouthwash it goes through on a friday night?
Yes, I've been to badastronomy [dot] com. I've also watched FOX News. What's your point? The "serious scientist" thing? Well, I do consider myself a serious scientist, and I don't support the official story that NASA sent men to the Moon, and I know there are others like me. So, that pretty much destroys your "no serious scientist anywhere supports this dumb hoax theory", theory.
@jelinto Plenty of scientists know Apollo was a fraud. As well as physics instructors, radiologists, astro and solar physicists. If you're fortunate enough to catch one in a private moment, over a couple of beers, they'll laugh heartily at the ignorant masses that still believe the Apollo Fairy Tale. Dingleberry sockpuppet trolls just don't get it though. Too damn ignorant I suppose!
@un4g1v3n1 Scientist who claim Apollo was a hoax are 2 Russians, Popov,Pokrovsky the other was a politician,Mukhin who were selling crappy books like Kaysing and Rene. That's all I could find, if you know of more so called scientist, name them. Other than that, you won't find one astrophysicist,radiologist that claim Apollo was a hoax, not 1.
Seems you hoaxheads base all your marbles on the prohibitive aspects of the Van Allen Belts, I'd love to talk to you about that subject sometime Ricky.
I'm sorry. I was a little harsh and I was demanding a little too much from you, when you're obviously lacking in intellect and attention span. Asking you to sit though all 7 parts of Jarrah's "32 Questions For Propagandists" wasn't fair. So you can skip ahead to part 6. That's where the questions are...
watch?v=1CDYZz_ECv8
The first 5 parts are just Jarrah dressing down your buddy Astrobrant2. It was funny to watch though.
Say, did Astrobrant2 ever address these questions?
Why do you avoid answering Jarrah's "32 Questions For Propagandists"?
Part 1 of 7 - watch?v=WzQvolVHH5I
I think I have a pretty good idea as to why you don't. It's because contained in those 32 questions are all the contradictions of NASA's Moon landing claim, and conclusively point to it as being a complete and total fraud.
Maybe you have a suggestion as to what might constitute an "honest setting".
How about Penn Jillette's radio show? Oh...no, that won't work. That's been done with a debate between Joe Rogan & Phil Plait and Joe Rogan mopped the floor with Phil Plait.
Hmmm...what would make an "honest setting" that would give Phil Plait a fighting chance? Obviously Jarrah White going into the belly of the beast at TAM8 isn't good enough, so what would satisfy the Moon landing wanna-believers?
@receiver69 Yeah, You're right, he's a graffiti vandal. Remember Rob, I just got into this fray a couple of months ago, I haven't been around the barn yet. That little volley with nasafakedit was hysterical!
I see how you guys ignore him, it probably won't be long before I do the same.
All these videos, from both sides of the camp are really great. I'm having a blast ! I just saw awe130's Apollo 9,great he's posted that one.Tho I don't agree with em', Jarrah's film are really entertaining.
Why would you post a video that makes you sound like a complete "dick" and Phil Plait as the reasonable one?
I mean maybe you thought it looked like he was being shaddy or dodging you or whatever, but it doesn't. It really looks (after watching this 5 times) like your a desperate person out for sound-bites....and from this video, you were.
@grayhog86 You know, I WOULD like to see them debate this in a honest setting...but I think Phil would destroy him. And Honestly, what would it proove other then whats been said a gazillion times before debunking the Moon Hoax Conspiracy?
An honest setting? Aren't the TAM conferences an honest setting in your opinion?
No? Well, thanks for confirming what I had always suspected; the TAM conferences are just a money grab by the people who organize these events. A money grab from people unable to think for themselves and need slick, convincing con artists to help them form their opinions and help them feel intelligent. In other words, propaganda under the guise of genuine skepticism.
@jelinto Wow...what? Dude, when are you going to figure it out, it's never been about the "Truth" for the Moon Landings, 911, UFOs or what the fuck ever it is on EITHER side of the arguement, it's about MONEY. Simple as that. Sell your DVD on your Con-Job-Spiracy web site for $49.95 +S&H to just 1% of the idiots who can't do math in the United States and take a guess how much money that is?
$15, 384, 600 US Dollers.
There's your proof on why they lie, debunk that number and motive.
Gee, I've never spent $49.95 on ANY DVD - conspiracy related or otherwise. As a matter of fact, just about ANY conspiracy related documentary can be seen on the internet...FOR FREE!!! Including ALL of Jarrah Whites videos. But if Jarrah decided to sell a DVD for 5 or 10 dollars, I wouldn't blame him. In fact I might purchase it as a gesture of support and he wouldn't be twisting my arm now, would he?
Hmmm...the truth is free, but ya gotta pay for propaganda. Why is that?
@jelinto IMHO, I'd say a panel debate with timed question and counter arguements would be just fine. Indeed, need someone to "Chair" it who is impartial, like say Diane Sawyer from ABC (just and idea).
Diane Sawyer from ABC? Mainstream media? Uhhh...I think some of us are going to find that a little suspect. I still don't understand why you Moon landing believers had such a problem with the Joe Rogan / Phil Plait debate with Penn Gillette as the mediator. If anything the scale was tipped in your favor, as Penn Gillette believes the Moon landings happened.
Anyways, I think Phil Plait is done debating the "Moon landings". He's been defeated & he's had enough.
@jelinto Who would you recomend? Alex Jones :)) Eh, just pick some High School that has a debate team and use the Teacher, someone unknown. Heck, even a Referee from any sports game would work, they just have to enforce the time limits.
I'm not much of an Alex Jones fan. BTW, he thinks man did walk on the moon and even had Buzz Aldrin on his show. LOL, that Buzz Aldrin...anything to make a buck.
I'm not sure why your side didn't like Penn Gillette. He is biased towards your side, but I still think he did a good job of mediating the Rogan vs. Plait debate.
But mainstream media is a no go. The number of people turning away from MSM is growing all the time, and for good reason. Too much fluff, no substance.
@jelinto Are you confusing "ambush journalism" with a debate? Usually when a debate happens both parties are aware that there will be a debate and both come prepared.
Un debate no se trata de molestar a alguien en un simposium y demandar que contesten tus preguntas.
Actually you're wrong. You need to go back in the comments to see how this conversation evolved. Besides, you and I are engaged in a debate right now. Was it scheduled? No, you just came along and challenged me and I responded.
Phil Plait said "Bring it...I'm ready for ya". Jarrah brought it and Phil Plait played the "I can't hear you" game. Is that what he meant by being ready? Ready to play childish games? Good grief, that's pathetic!
You missed it. I did respond to Luke's question in a way. I let him know I knew exactly where he was headed with it, and didn't appreciate his pussyfooting around. I said make your point and lets get on with it. He decided to instead, start deleting my comments and then block me. No worries. The "I hope he takes the bait" comment from yesterday, was kind of a put off.
Anyways, thanks for the kind words, Tweekerhead, and realize I hold no hard feeling towards you either.
Don't worry about Luke blocking me. I have no desire to return to his channel or videos. It's all good.
And yeah...that guy in the Themate Debate video is a genius. I applaud his efforts. It maybe by itself doesn't prove that thermate was used at the WTC, but it does prove it's more than just a possibility. I respect your choice to stay out of the 9/11 debate. It's cool that you can recognize his ingenuity, regardless of what you think about 9/11. Peace!
Tweekerhead & I obviously disagree about the alleged Moon landings, we've hurled insults at one another, and I wouldn't be surprised if we engaged in debate that devolves into that kind of unproductive exchange in the future. However, we did find some common ground on another issue, and were able to talk civilized to one another for one brief shining moment. It made me re-realize that it is important to at least make an effort from time to time to find our commonalities. Cheers
@jelinto You know, I totally agree, "Mainstream" is so overrated and full of itself. Oh I got the guy, Julian Assange would be perfect...if he's not in jail at the time.
@BadBunnyRides Watch the beginning of the video again, and listen to what Phil Plait says, but then when someone actually does "bring it" he pussies out because he knows that he's going to lose the argument. We didn't go to the moon end of story, get over it.
@Darklinkzelda "We didn't go to the moon end of story, get over it." ...really? So Japan, France and Russia are all "in on it"? It's a World Wide con-job-spiracy? If you don't know why I mention those countries, you have no clue what your talking about and nothing to add at all here.
@2nasafakedit Answer the question, why are you hiding all of a sudden? That's odd.....
How many rems was absorbed in the 2 hr. transit thr' the VA belts? How rare is a high event of cosmic rays?
You can't even answer a simple question, you saw a vide and you were so impressed, you based your belief system on it.....keep typing funny words, have you been to the Ozarks lately, I think you have a fan.
"The Moon is a bright gamma-ray source. The Moon is brighter than the Sun in gamma rays. The surface of the Moon is exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares. When cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet, and trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!" -Dr Robert Naeye, NASA GLAST Fermi Gamma Ray Space 2007
@2nasafakedit You conveniently forgot the other part of that article:
"Being a cold, mostly inert object, the Moon is utterly INCAPABLE of producing gamma rays on its OWN. But cosmic-ray particles slamming into the lunar surface produce SECONDARY gamma rays."
@2nasafakedit Flunky, you're misquoting the facts..AGAIN!
"Being a cold, mostly inert object, the Moon is utterly INCAPABLE of producing gamma rays on its OWN. But cosmic-ray particles slamming into the lunar surface produce SECONDARY gamma rays."
There's no mention in this article about ""The lunar surface is full of secondary little nuclear explosions"
That is a LIE! Secondary nuclear explosion !!! LOLOLOL HOHOHOH Too Rich Que Rico!!
@2nasafakedit ".secondary little nuclear explosions".." Hahahahahaha How come we can't see those little "secondary little nuclear explosions" ? Answer: Because they are Gamma rays not explosions, you got caught lying..again..IDIOT hahahahahhahaha whata' moron, too easy.
Answer my question. or STFU giggle giggle hehehehe too easy......hehehehe
@receiver69 He is nice deep down. Hey Rob, am I being to eager? He says the funniest things when he's trying to be acute. Maybe he should try to be more obtuse like the nasafakedit guy.
Love your videos man!
I was watching Jarrahs 5 part series this morn',."Plait, Myth Busters & Dirty Tricks", something like that..
Really funny , one might think that this was a comedy. He comes to America, gets dismissed by Plait, then at the end when he puts the flowers in the creek and talks to it, awesome!
Unedited in all it's glory. Hoaxheads can't stand to see this bird fly. And kids this was first developed by Rolls Royce, the same people that make them pretty cars.
Then NASA with Bell modified their design and put some G.E. engines in it, that's called R&D. Over 300 successful flights were recorded, put a rocket engine in it and,you have a Moon lander!
Thanks stalker,I'd never figure this out if it wasn't for you.
@stalkervision You don't really know what a strawman is, you just heard it in one of these hoax videos.
That wouldn't be a strawman fallacy, you would have to prove NASA was inept, and you can not do that.
I think you hoaxheads are just a bunch of kids, you all have the same age on your profile and you lying about your age. Now tell me about the Cuban Missile crisis, and how you where there, pero, Yo creo que tu no eres lo que pretendes ser. Starwman !! LOLOL Tell me more about the LLRV!
@stalkervision "Do you believe there was only one person that developed the airplane the Helicopter or RADAR or the Jet engine or even the atomic bomb?"
Wait...are you saying that NASA was brilliant enough to invent this LLRV without the help of Rolls and their R&D?
NASA is inept or brillant, which is it? Gawd man you're gettin' yourself caught in your own trap.
Could you please explain your last comment, the one above, I don't want to take it out of context.
@stalkervision Cuban Missile crisis?!? That happened in Oct 62'. You were there? You must be Cuban, if you are you should comprehend this.
Yo creo que tu no eres lo que pretendes ser. Entonces, cuando tengas las ideas claras podremos conversar. Pero, tu sigues asumiendo y asumir no significa que tengas la razon. Pero, yo no creo que tu seas capaz de comprender esta idea, dickhead.
@stalkervision My man...NASA was trying to do VTOL's on their tails, literally facing upwards.
Where did you think all this technology came from to do the landings? Outer Mongolia?
I can tell you not that old, tell me any thing from the 60's. Give me some remote reference from the late 50's or 60's that only someone from the 60's would know.
@stalkervision Look at my posts and replies, now look at yours. And who's going on childish little rant with immature and infantile behavior ? That's a pretty big hole you dug for yourself Hassabald ...lol
Notice I don't rely on the personal attack fallacy, like you're ultimately reduced to using, whenever any we have any volley of words. That's what happens when you are over your head in any of this subject matter. Which pretty much encompasses the rage of facts regarding Apollo. Next..
@stalkervision Damn, you're slower than most hoaxheads stalker
Rolls invented the Bedstead in 53' NASA took that designed and walked on the backs of those Rolls engineers to come up with the LLRV, that's called development. And that development gave the NASA astronauts the skills they needed to fly the NASA Bedstead with such great equanimity.
Somebody help me here, stalker's having a little trouble figuring this out.Can anyone here explain to him this issue on a level that he can understand?
@stalkervision Pro photog' they didn't know what a Hasselblad is, thought it was a Hassabald, fact one.
Apollogist' obsession with simple mistakes? Usually when a self proclaimed expert can't even spell properly the tools of his trade, that's a good indication the expert is not an expert but a prevaricator...I mean bullshitter, sorry to use big words.
Here's something that's not a hoax...You might have to thank NASA someday for your ass being here. Apophis ain't no joke! watch?v=LXV0uBfRb0A
@stalkervision Admitting you were right ? That's typical of the self diluted statements that I see coming from you often. You didn't know that Rolls invented this( watch?v=f8W2SI4c93s ) until you fell into my trap and spewed hours of nonsense about something you knew nothing about, making a fool out of yourself, priceless. Is that why you've been hiding? You ran away and hid like that after you stated you were a professional photographer, then kept calling it a "Hassabald" You too much...lol
@stalkervision Nope,projecting again I see, Bedstead was a Rolls Royce design. The LLRV or LLTV as the astronauts called it, was developed by NASA and it was modified from the Rolls design. I played a trick on you and you fell for it.Point of this was,if they could do VTOL in 54' with this: watch?v=f8W2SI4c93s
They could do it in 69' in 1/6 gravity.Typical.
stalker claimed to be a Pro' photographer, then start calling the Hasselblad ... "HASSABALD" "HASSABALD" "HASSABALD" over &over !
@NASAvsPETE No, I'm not Plait. Quite frankly, I don't think he would bother doing this. Like how Buzz Aldrin doesn't bother responding to the obscenities and insults hoax mongers leave on his channel.
My featured video with the puppet dog was made by SuperSoylent. Did you like his video? I thought it was funny as hell.
The thought of using a dog sock puppet to "masterbate" [sic] has never crossed my mind. Very distinguished comment, Pete. True to the nature of your ilk.
It is easier to believe a lie that one has heard a thousand times than to believe a fact that no one has heard before. All these knuckleheads like Jay Windley's and Phil Plait's are bunch of liars.
@NASAvsPETE Are you Pete Stapleton, by any chance? PM me if you like. I will not reveal your ID to anyone.
If you _are_ Pete Stapleton, then I know why you spent a lot of time with Randi. You were trying, unsuccessfully, to win the Randi challenge. The Pete I'm thinking of had some "ABOVE 100% accurate" numerological something-or-other that he was constantly spamming to Usenet newsgroups about 20 years ago. Yeah, that Pete was anti-NASA, too.
@stalkervision Ah, okay. Well, I know nothing about the claims you (he?) make about someone's findings on what the Ektachrome film could tolerate and what it couldn't. I don't spend my time combing the literature to find something I can twist to my advantage.
I'd be better able to judge the statements if I can see the article for myself. Because every time I see such claims, it turns out that they are misrepresentative. So let me go read these findings and I'll be back.
@stalkervision If you trace back to the initial source, of course transmissions of NASA missions come from NASA. The live TV broadcasts came from NASA astronauts on a NASA mission using NASA equipment. The fact remains that neither you nor anyone else has shown any evidence that the coverage we got was fake.
Or are you going to provide that evidence now? After all, you said my statement that no credible evidence has been presented against NASA was "stupid."
@stalkervision "Maybe you should read the dictionary about it because it has a lot of words.."
Now _there's_ a good idea! Let's seeee...Apollooo...ah, yes:
"(Astronautics) any of a series of manned US spacecraft designed to explore the moon and surrounding space. Apollo 11 made the first moon landing in July 1969."
Dawkins is passionate and strong in his belief in evolution, but when he is accosted by fundy Christians making all the same stupid accusations and asking the same questions that he has answered dozens of times, he gives them the cold shoulder.
The same is true of many climatologists when they are accosted by global warming deniers. (That's what caused "climategate.") Obama will ignore "birthers." Etc.
Only a creationist, global warming denier, or birther would consider them hypocritical.
@stalkervision Okay, so again you refuse to state what argument I made that you consider bad. I wonder why. Aren't you eager to _demonstrate_ how wrong I am and how right you are by actually refuting my argument instead of making general unsupported condemnations of it? Most people are smarter than to be fooled by that kind of tactic.
@stalkervision As promised, I am going to ask you for specifics every time you make that kind of general criticism of my arguments. Which Apollo argument do you consider "pitiful" and why?
"Checked with Clavis ! LMAO ! the Mormon bible of apologist thinking."
Why did you say that? I already said I knew that was your attitude. Now, have you looked at the pictures? Regardless of _who_ posted them, the conclusion is obvious. Did they paste stripes on the flag picture?
You know, it really isn't very credible to just keep repeating how bad you think someone's arguments are instead of making a legitimate attempt to refute them. Why don't you respond to whatever argument I made and _back up_ that assertion? Show everybody _why_ my argument is jejune. Or do you just not feel up to that kind of honest debate?
@stalkervision And you say MY arguments are bad? If you check the Clavius site, you will see this discussed. It doesn't matter whether you have already condemned the author of that site, the pictures he shows are OBVIOUS examples of how light areas bleed over the fiducials. You can see several examples of how they are _partially_ obscured.
Do you really think they would paste white stripes on a picture of the flag after it was made?
Geez, I can't believe you still make this argument!
phil is like...gazillion times more educated than any of you who created/liked this video...just listen to any of his q & ba post on yt abd you will get my drift.
btw... "no landing on moon" is sooo refuted... leave it at rest, please
zoroaster1973 1 week ago
Phil Plait is very polite. Whoever made this video is a deluded nut bar.
LeeRoy3535 2 weeks ago
Dear maker of this video, have you taken into consideration that are really being rude, not taking no for an answer, forcing yourself on him with a hidden camera and sounding offended that he hasn't taken the time to respond to your particular epiphany. From Plait's perspective he has debated with about 3420 moon hoaxers like you and by the time you come along as nr. 3421 he may just be a bit tired and rather want to have a chat with his pals? Deal with it.
KyrreKausrud 2 weeks ago
bring it phil bring it
haydenmossop 4 weeks ago
The person who made this video, needs to speak to a psychiatrist because the radio beams you are picking up in your fillings are telling you lies..
jlecelec 1 month ago
Why do the people who believe we went to the moon think space radiation is no big deal. NASA seems to think so. In fact, NASA says the number one hazard to space travel is radiation, specifically gamma rays and galactic cosmic rays.
Daddyo930 2 months ago
@Daddyo930 Yes it is hazardous. No this does not make it impossible.
I presume you are still having trouble finding anyone with some training in physics or radiation to back up your claims.
krisdevalle 2 months ago
@krisdevalle I presume you are still struggling for control with your multiple personalities. ?How's that working out for ya?
Daddyo930 2 months ago
@Daddyo930 There is nothing like a poorly-constructed insult to let me know you have no real response to my accusation.
You're adorable!
krisdevalle 2 months ago
@Daddyo930 You poor guy, broaden your research will ya'!!
Only 60-100 rem from Galactic Cosmic Rays per year hit Earth.
Lizard man ... stop trying to confuse us humans!! We know 12 men walked on your lizard Moon.
Tweekerhead 2 months ago
@Tweekerhead Galactic cosmic rays are one of the most important barriers standing in the way of plans for interplanetary travel by crewed spacecraft. Galactic cosmic rays (GCR) consist of high energy protons (85%), helium (14%) and other high energy nuclei (HZE). Solar energetic particles consist primarily of protons accelerated by the sun to high energies via proximity to solar flares and coronal mass ejections. You should stop with your bad science.
Daddyo930 1 month ago
@Daddyo930 Bad science? Coming from a guy who said"1rad=62.4x106MeV" or that the Magnetosphere stops gamma rays, you aren't in any position to tell anyone about science, especially me.
You are very wrong about the composition of GCR's, where'd you get your information?
Mine comes from the Fly's Eye Obs.Utah,I have a friend there.
GCR's consist of:
protons 50%
αlpha particles 25%
C,N,O nuclei 13%
electrons 1%
Gamma ray radiation ≤ 0.1%
You should stop, I know this stuff, you don't
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
@Tweekerhead You should stop. As a matter of fact we will until you answer this question. Are you familiar with remote viewing?
Daddyo930 1 month ago
@Daddyo930 Is it your wacky emotional bias that restricts you from reading with any discernible comprehension?
I figured out yesterday that when you make your assertions on the Cosmic rays you're using your blundered notation. You think that 1rad = 6614.4MeV.
If that was the case we'd all be dead.
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
@Tweekerhead 1rad=62.4x106 MeV is WRONG. It's 1rad=10^6 MeV
The six is an exponent you can't even get a simple notation right.
I estimate 6billion MeV hit Earth a year from Cosmic Rays,
That's 6,000,000,000 MeV a year.
That would hardly light a 100 watt bulb.
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tweekerhead You should stop. As a matter of fact we will until you answer this question. Are you familiar with remote viewing? You seem desperate to not answer the question.
Daddyo930 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tweekerhead You should stop. As a matter of fact we will until you answer this question. Are you familiar with remote viewing? You seem desperate to not answer the question. I don't mind asking the question a million times. Is there something your afraid of?
Daddyo930 1 month ago
@Daddyo930 I should have stated that the percentages & composition of GCR's I posted was of energies at or below 10¹³ eV values.
I know how pedantic you can be with your data....LOL
Who has bad science?
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tweekerhead You should stop. As a matter of fact we will until you answer this question. Are you familiar with remote viewing?
Daddyo930 1 month ago
Lol, make a video wherein you try to interview someone who turns you down on account of your taking quotes out of context and stitching together non-sequiturs, reply that you in fact do not, and then proceed to do just that. What credibility do you think you have left?
ianman6 2 months ago
Comment removed
Quex01 6 months ago
he also said "dont be a dick".....something the interviewer should have listened to.
sethmusic 6 months ago
Science tells us that we never went to the moon. Catalogue of LDE flares (January 1969 - March 1986) differential rotation of the Sun during the period 1921-1971. page 96. page 82 for descriptions of chart on 96. Apollo 12, launched during a solar flare. There is no way astronauts can fly through M6 and X4 class solar flares.
Daddyo930 6 months ago
@Daddyo930
Except you're not employing 'science'--you're twisting it to promote your incorrect and prejudiced assumptions.
MadHighway 2 months ago
But Jarrah, you didn't argue anything, so you didn't bring it on in the first place. So, what's the point of the video?
The man rightly judged you as someone not worth his time, and you think that's a win?
MoronAntidote 7 months ago
@receiver69 Your an idiot, there are scientists that think the moon landing was a fraud, and as more others, they won't say because of the damn government.
Darklinkzelda 7 months ago
@Darklinkzelda
Name those scientists. Names. (Hint: there aren't any. You made it up.)
MadHighway 2 months ago
Science is a language, it's a way of thinking, it's a common agreement on applying logic and hard work to gain knowledge.
Jarrah White demonstrated himself that he isn't even capable of doing basic mathematic calculations. He's not interested in learning, he just thinks he'll become famous by imitating Ralph Rene.
Phil Plait is right: There's no use talking to someone who doesn't even speak the same language. It's a waste of time.
AndreasZ05 11 months ago
@AndreasZ05
Achso, wer nur laut genug WISSENSCHAFT brüllt, hat also recht? Und wer sich wie Jarrah die Mühe macht den ganzen Mondlandeschwachsinn zu hinterfragen, ist deiner Welt ein Dummkopf?
schiller2222 11 months ago
@schiller2222
Nein dumm sind nur die Verschwörungs-Spinner, die sich gerne eine gruselige Phantasiewelt herbeiträumen wollen und denen es schon ausreicht, wenn sie etwas nicht auf Anhieb verstehen, um "VERSCHWÖRUNG" zu brüllen.
Dumm ist es, wenn man sich dermaßen an seine Vorstellungen klammert, dass man jede Antwort ignoriert, die einen davon abbringen würde.
Was würde dich denn überzeugen, dass du falsch liegst? Menschen die LERNEN, ändern jeden Tag ein bisschen ihre Weltsicht.
Ihr nicht.
AndreasZ05 11 months ago
Comment removed
schiller2222 11 months ago
Comment removed
schiller2222 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AndreasZ05 Ich habe zwar nur eine Klippschule besucht, aber meine technische, naturwissenschaftliche und medienphilosophische Bildung reicht vollkommen aus, um die Mondlandung als eine reine von der NASA kreierte Illusion zu erkennen. Dieser Freimauerverein NASA ist selbst nach über 40 Jahren noch nicht in der Lage die Mondlandung mit Aufnahmen zu verifizieren. Stattdessen kommen hier einige Mondlandeshirnis und pissen Mondlandekritiker ans Bein, in dem sie als Antisemiten bezeichnet werden.
schiller2222 11 months ago
@schiller2222
I'd never call anyone an anti-semite without good reasons, and "deadlyradiation" alias "WhiteJarrah" has a YouTube friend called "JewsJewsJewsJewsJews" who, just as the name suggests, is a genuine anti-semite.
That is what I call a fact. I know you guys don't bother much about facts as soon as they don't fit in your little fairy-tales.
AndreasZ05 11 months ago
@AndreasZ05 So anyone who uses word "jews" is an anti-semite? Maybe he just likes jews very much? Maybe he is even jew himself? Who's an anti-semite then?
Quex01 6 months ago
@Quex01
no, this guy didn't name his channel "jewsjewsjewsjewsjews" because he likes jews very much, and I'm really sure because he featured videos about "jews did 911" and jewish-conspiracy stuff like that. As I said before, I wouldn't call anyone an anti-semite without a good reason, because it's a serious thing, guess we both agree on that one.
AndreasZ05 6 months ago
@AndreasZ05 Serious in what sense?
Quex01 6 months ago
@AndreasZ05 Oh i see you're one of those german self-hating pussy boys, raped by the russians, americans and ruled by the zionists. I pitty you.
Quex01 6 months ago
@Quex01
Look at you, although you don't have any information about me, you say that I was "self-hating" and had been "raped" by someone.
It is obvious to anyone with brains that you are attacking you own self picture that you're projecting onto me. You are the one who has been hurt or even raped in the past, which, by the way, is the only explanation why you would spend his time trying to hurt the feelings of strangers in the internet.
I'm not qualified to help you,but thx for the "pitty"
AndreasZ05 6 months ago
@AndreasZ05 Shut up rape victim. Raped Hoes like you dont get to speak
MassTransit999 2 months ago
@AndreasZ05
Are you also a "bring it on and I'm running away" little prognathous fag like plait?
potrodsas 6 months ago
@potrodsas There's a difference between being dismissed and "running away from".
Plait has a PhD...Do you know what a Y-Tube hoaxer is to a guy with a PhD?
Can you say 'flea on a dog's ass'?
Tweekerhead 2 months ago
This video should be called: "Plait runs away like a whining bitch".
cTcSpirit 1 year ago
I don't need a PhD to see that SS-Sturmbannführer Dr. Wernher von Braun was a liar and murderer. Dr. Phil Plait is nothing more than a whore to NASA.
The whole "apollo manned landing program" was a hoax!
schiller2222 1 year ago
AndreasZ05 11 months ago
he comes across in this video as being fake and gay.
datzfast 1 year ago
im like bill clinton. you learn things latter that make you wonder was the truth told.
datzfast 1 year ago
phil plait comes over as very untrustworthy. he wont debate his own words. that is pussy like in evey way.
datzfast 1 year ago
The only thing that will make you believe is if we took you by the hand there and showed you, even then I bet you would say we put them there just before you got there. I don't blame him for not wanting to talk to nutcases. He is right, you won't listen to the words anyway so what is the point? He has better things to do.
redshift40 1 year ago
Hmmm, who to trust?
A guy with a PhD in astronomy and over a decade of work and research?
Or the guy with seemingly no credentials other than a camera?
Tough call.
rm06c 1 year ago
@receiver69
OK! Regardless of how much of a fucking idiot you are, the moon landings were hoaxes.
Same goes for this fucking Plait person.
DutchPetrifiedWood 1 year ago
@DutchPetrifiedWood You might as well ignore this twat. I have it on good word that it's a troll, who spends a great deal of time polishing petrified wood in the alley behind a gym populated by gentlemen who prefer the company of each other over womanfolk. And of course this particularly nasty little troll has a large number of sockpuppet accounts it uses to agree with itself. Sad beyond words! Poor little trolls. I wonder how much mouthwash it goes through on a friday night?
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@receiver69
I can't see anything in the world this stupid queer can possibly be right about,but do enlighten us.
DutchPetrifiedWood 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@receiver69
> Phil Plait is right.
Surely not!
schiller2222 1 year ago
@receiver69 run it through your translator again doosh bag!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@receiver69 Ya, gotta lube em up, and lower those inhibitions, like worrying about their career potential should they be blabbing about Apollo!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@receiver69
Yes, I've been to badastronomy [dot] com. I've also watched FOX News. What's your point? The "serious scientist" thing? Well, I do consider myself a serious scientist, and I don't support the official story that NASA sent men to the Moon, and I know there are others like me. So, that pretty much destroys your "no serious scientist anywhere supports this dumb hoax theory", theory.
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto Plenty of scientists know Apollo was a fraud. As well as physics instructors, radiologists, astro and solar physicists. If you're fortunate enough to catch one in a private moment, over a couple of beers, they'll laugh heartily at the ignorant masses that still believe the Apollo Fairy Tale. Dingleberry sockpuppet trolls just don't get it though. Too damn ignorant I suppose!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 Scientist who claim Apollo was a hoax are 2 Russians, Popov,Pokrovsky the other was a politician,Mukhin who were selling crappy books like Kaysing and Rene. That's all I could find, if you know of more so called scientist, name them. Other than that, you won't find one astrophysicist,radiologist that claim Apollo was a hoax, not 1.
Seems you hoaxheads base all your marbles on the prohibitive aspects of the Van Allen Belts, I'd love to talk to you about that subject sometime Ricky.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@receiver69
I'm sorry. I was a little harsh and I was demanding a little too much from you, when you're obviously lacking in intellect and attention span. Asking you to sit though all 7 parts of Jarrah's "32 Questions For Propagandists" wasn't fair. So you can skip ahead to part 6. That's where the questions are...
watch?v=1CDYZz_ECv8
The first 5 parts are just Jarrah dressing down your buddy Astrobrant2. It was funny to watch though.
Say, did Astrobrant2 ever address these questions?
jelinto 1 year ago
Comment removed
jelinto 1 year ago
@receiver69
Fine. Have it your way. Stick your head in the sand and ignore reality.
watch?v=bmk1dToZYGo
"...no one told you when to run...you missed the starting gun..."
jelinto 1 year ago
Jarrah has asked Phil Plait the Idiot
to debate with him in public about
the allleged TV moon landings
but although Phil is dumb he is not that dumb
to make a complete idiot of himself in public
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@receiver69
Why do you avoid answering Jarrah's "32 Questions For Propagandists"?
Part 1 of 7 - watch?v=WzQvolVHH5I
I think I have a pretty good idea as to why you don't. It's because contained in those 32 questions are all the contradictions of NASA's Moon landing claim, and conclusively point to it as being a complete and total fraud.
:o)
jelinto 1 year ago
Plait looks like a queer
DutchPetrifiedWood 1 year ago
@DutchPetrifiedWood Plait is a Queer
All shills have 2 things in common, its uncanny
1) They all are halfwits
2) They all are queers
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
Phil Plait the Proaganda Moron
This lying low life government nasa whore is too scared to debate
the Fake Moonlandings in public
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit
Thank you that was precisely my point. Plait is an astronomical queer friend of Armstrong.
DutchPetrifiedWood 1 year ago
Phil Plait has had his plate filled with nasa/ taxpayers money and he is blinding his beliefs purposely.
EGMAG 1 year ago
@receiver69
Maybe you have a suggestion as to what might constitute an "honest setting".
How about Penn Jillette's radio show? Oh...no, that won't work. That's been done with a debate between Joe Rogan & Phil Plait and Joe Rogan mopped the floor with Phil Plait.
Hmmm...what would make an "honest setting" that would give Phil Plait a fighting chance? Obviously Jarrah White going into the belly of the beast at TAM8 isn't good enough, so what would satisfy the Moon landing wanna-believers?
jelinto 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit is a MORON
This douchebag is too scared to debate oin public
the fake apollo missions
Typical Shill Pimp
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2nasafakedit is a MORON
This douchebag is too scared to debate oin public
the fake apollo missions
Typical Shill Pimp
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Phil Plait is a MORON
This douchebag is too scared to debate oin public
the fake apollo missions
Typical Shill Pimp
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit is a MORON
This douchebag is too scared to debate oin public
the fake apollo missions
Typical Shill Pimp
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit is a MORON
This douchebag is too scared to debate oin public
the fake apollo missions
Typical Shill Pimp
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@receiver69 Yeah, You're right, he's a graffiti vandal. Remember Rob, I just got into this fray a couple of months ago, I haven't been around the barn yet. That little volley with nasafakedit was hysterical!
I see how you guys ignore him, it probably won't be long before I do the same.
All these videos, from both sides of the camp are really great. I'm having a blast ! I just saw awe130's Apollo 9,great he's posted that one.Tho I don't agree with em', Jarrah's film are really entertaining.
TC
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead the Fuckhead
This retarded shill propaganda faeces has no idea what protects the earth
and the moon from cosmic radiation yet he continues to TROLL on
youtube nasa fake apolo videos 12 hours a day for $10 a day
retarted sack of shit
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
Why would you post a video that makes you sound like a complete "dick" and Phil Plait as the reasonable one?
I mean maybe you thought it looked like he was being shaddy or dodging you or whatever, but it doesn't. It really looks (after watching this 5 times) like your a desperate person out for sound-bites....and from this video, you were.
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides My thought exactly. lol - backfired imho. Don't confuse Jarrah with facts.
grayhog86 1 year ago
@grayhog86 You know, I WOULD like to see them debate this in a honest setting...but I think Phil would destroy him. And Honestly, what would it proove other then whats been said a gazillion times before debunking the Moon Hoax Conspiracy?
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides
An honest setting? Aren't the TAM conferences an honest setting in your opinion?
No? Well, thanks for confirming what I had always suspected; the TAM conferences are just a money grab by the people who organize these events. A money grab from people unable to think for themselves and need slick, convincing con artists to help them form their opinions and help them feel intelligent. In other words, propaganda under the guise of genuine skepticism.
Kudos 2 U, BadBunnyRides!
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto Wow...what? Dude, when are you going to figure it out, it's never been about the "Truth" for the Moon Landings, 911, UFOs or what the fuck ever it is on EITHER side of the arguement, it's about MONEY. Simple as that. Sell your DVD on your Con-Job-Spiracy web site for $49.95 +S&H to just 1% of the idiots who can't do math in the United States and take a guess how much money that is?
$15, 384, 600 US Dollers.
There's your proof on why they lie, debunk that number and motive.
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides
Gee, I've never spent $49.95 on ANY DVD - conspiracy related or otherwise. As a matter of fact, just about ANY conspiracy related documentary can be seen on the internet...FOR FREE!!! Including ALL of Jarrah Whites videos. But if Jarrah decided to sell a DVD for 5 or 10 dollars, I wouldn't blame him. In fact I might purchase it as a gesture of support and he wouldn't be twisting my arm now, would he?
Hmmm...the truth is free, but ya gotta pay for propaganda. Why is that?
jelinto 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides
...Anyways, back to the original question; what would constitute an "honest setting"?
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto IMHO, I'd say a panel debate with timed question and counter arguements would be just fine. Indeed, need someone to "Chair" it who is impartial, like say Diane Sawyer from ABC (just and idea).
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides
Diane Sawyer from ABC? Mainstream media? Uhhh...I think some of us are going to find that a little suspect. I still don't understand why you Moon landing believers had such a problem with the Joe Rogan / Phil Plait debate with Penn Gillette as the mediator. If anything the scale was tipped in your favor, as Penn Gillette believes the Moon landings happened.
Anyways, I think Phil Plait is done debating the "Moon landings". He's been defeated & he's had enough.
:o)
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto Who would you recomend? Alex Jones :)) Eh, just pick some High School that has a debate team and use the Teacher, someone unknown. Heck, even a Referee from any sports game would work, they just have to enforce the time limits.
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides
I'm not much of an Alex Jones fan. BTW, he thinks man did walk on the moon and even had Buzz Aldrin on his show. LOL, that Buzz Aldrin...anything to make a buck.
I'm not sure why your side didn't like Penn Gillette. He is biased towards your side, but I still think he did a good job of mediating the Rogan vs. Plait debate.
But mainstream media is a no go. The number of people turning away from MSM is growing all the time, and for good reason. Too much fluff, no substance.
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto Are you confusing "ambush journalism" with a debate? Usually when a debate happens both parties are aware that there will be a debate and both come prepared.
Un debate no se trata de molestar a alguien en un simposium y demandar que contesten tus preguntas.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Actually you're wrong. You need to go back in the comments to see how this conversation evolved. Besides, you and I are engaged in a debate right now. Was it scheduled? No, you just came along and challenged me and I responded.
Phil Plait said "Bring it...I'm ready for ya". Jarrah brought it and Phil Plait played the "I can't hear you" game. Is that what he meant by being ready? Ready to play childish games? Good grief, that's pathetic!
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto You are the brightest of the hoaxheads' jelinto, no doubt about it.
I wish you would answer Luke's question tho'. You might contribute to the exchange.
You're a good person jelinto, I can tell, I think Luke and and astro' and the rest also respect you as well.
We are all children in the eyes of God.
I like your vid on thermates, from your channel btw....
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
You missed it. I did respond to Luke's question in a way. I let him know I knew exactly where he was headed with it, and didn't appreciate his pussyfooting around. I said make your point and lets get on with it. He decided to instead, start deleting my comments and then block me. No worries. The "I hope he takes the bait" comment from yesterday, was kind of a put off.
Anyways, thanks for the kind words, Tweekerhead, and realize I hold no hard feeling towards you either.
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto Luke blocked you? I'm gonna' ask him to change it then.
still reelin from your welder's vid tho....damn that guy is good. I aint goin' there. I'm like Sgt. Shultz
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Don't worry about Luke blocking me. I have no desire to return to his channel or videos. It's all good.
And yeah...that guy in the Themate Debate video is a genius. I applaud his efforts. It maybe by itself doesn't prove that thermate was used at the WTC, but it does prove it's more than just a possibility. I respect your choice to stay out of the 9/11 debate. It's cool that you can recognize his ingenuity, regardless of what you think about 9/11. Peace!
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto dude tweekerhead is a mental retard
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit
Tweekerhead & I obviously disagree about the alleged Moon landings, we've hurled insults at one another, and I wouldn't be surprised if we engaged in debate that devolves into that kind of unproductive exchange in the future. However, we did find some common ground on another issue, and were able to talk civilized to one another for one brief shining moment. It made me re-realize that it is important to at least make an effort from time to time to find our commonalities. Cheers
jelinto 1 year ago
@jelinto
Insults are essential when chatting with shill propagandists like tweekerhead
who are the lowest form of life on planet earth
and only post drivel
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@jelinto You know, I totally agree, "Mainstream" is so overrated and full of itself. Oh I got the guy, Julian Assange would be perfect...if he's not in jail at the time.
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@jelinto He's been defeated & he's had enough.<<
Money will make him talk like money made him shut up.
EGMAG 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BadBunnyRides My thought exactly. lol - backfired imho. Don't confuse Jarrah with facts.
grayhog86 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides Watch the beginning of the video again, and listen to what Phil Plait says, but then when someone actually does "bring it" he pussies out because he knows that he's going to lose the argument. We didn't go to the moon end of story, get over it.
Darklinkzelda 7 months ago
@Darklinkzelda "We didn't go to the moon end of story, get over it." ...really? So Japan, France and Russia are all "in on it"? It's a World Wide con-job-spiracy? If you don't know why I mention those countries, you have no clue what your talking about and nothing to add at all here.
Go back to your video games child.
BadBunnyRides 7 months ago
PHIL the Faggot
Debate Jarrah you coward
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit the Brain Dead Homunculus Troglodyte...Answer a simple question. Why run from it?
How rare is a Cosmic Ray event of high GeV ? Not α, but Γ that is...Brain Dick
How long would you have to stand in one spot on the Moon before one would hit you? I
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit the Brain Dead Homunculus Troglodyte...Answer don't run.
How rare is a Cosmic Ray event of high GeV ? Not α, but Γ that is...Brain Dick
How long would you have to stand in one spot on the Moon before one would hit you?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit the Brain Dead Homunculus Troglodyte...Answer a simple question. Why run from it?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tweekerhead
"Answer a simple question. Why run from it?"
Like Plait?
adiohead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead the mental halfwit
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit Answer the question, why are you hiding all of a sudden? That's odd.....
How many rems was absorbed in the 2 hr. transit thr' the VA belts? How rare is a high event of cosmic rays?
You can't even answer a simple question, you saw a vide and you were so impressed, you based your belief system on it.....keep typing funny words, have you been to the Ozarks lately, I think you have a fan.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead Fuckhead
"The Moon is a bright gamma-ray source. The Moon is brighter than the Sun in gamma rays. The surface of the Moon is exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares. When cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet, and trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!" -Dr Robert Naeye, NASA GLAST Fermi Gamma Ray Space 2007
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit You conveniently forgot the other part of that article:
"Being a cold, mostly inert object, the Moon is utterly INCAPABLE of producing gamma rays on its OWN. But cosmic-ray particles slamming into the lunar surface produce SECONDARY gamma rays."
Another science moment FAIL. nice try.....
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead Fuckhead
Monkey brain lol, it still means deadly cosmic rays shit for brains
"..and trigger little nuclear reactions.."
Your mother should have aborted her idiot child
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit Love how you posted a misquote from Dr. Naeye. Gotta try and twist and fix things to fit you argument, lame.
You're Owned, next, done with this idiot. too easy...
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead Fuckhead
Your retard logic is pathetic
"The lunar surface is full of secondary little nuclear explosions"
Do you think thats safe ? brain damaged human ape
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit Flunky, you're misquoting the facts..AGAIN!
"Being a cold, mostly inert object, the Moon is utterly INCAPABLE of producing gamma rays on its OWN. But cosmic-ray particles slamming into the lunar surface produce SECONDARY gamma rays."
There's no mention in this article about ""The lunar surface is full of secondary little nuclear explosions"
That is a LIE! Secondary nuclear explosion !!! LOLOLOL HOHOHOH Too Rich Que Rico!!
OMG You are an IDIOT Hahahahahahahahahahaha
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead Fuckhead with his retard laugh
"..trigger little nuclear reactions.."
Do you think thats safe monkey brain?
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit ".secondary little nuclear explosions".." Hahahahahaha How come we can't see those little "secondary little nuclear explosions" ? Answer: Because they are Gamma rays not explosions, you got caught lying..again..IDIOT hahahahahhahaha whata' moron, too easy.
Answer my question. or STFU giggle giggle hehehehe too easy......hehehehe
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead Fuyckhead
Your comments are incoherent you sad monkey brain
The moon has a very weak magnetic field you dumb retarded ape, so what would then protect a life form there?
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit How rare is a Cosmic Ray event of high GeV ? Not α, but Γ that is...
How long would you have to stand in one spot on the Moon before one would hit you?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit How rare is a Cosmic Ray event of high GeV ? Not α, but Γ that is...
How long would you have to stand in one spot on the Moon before one would hit you?
Waiting, I've answered your inane questions ...now answer mine ..if you can...hahhahahahaha whata' Nimrod
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit Waiting ... where did you go? That's odd... I thought you wre gonna answer my question, you're acting like Phil Plaite ..
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead the propaganda monkey can not even spell phil plait the idiots name correctly
Seek help retard
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit You can't even spell fuckhead...Fuyckhead?
How rare is a Cosmic Ray event of high GeV ? Not α, but Γ that is...
How long would you have to stand in one spot on the Moon before one would hit you?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit How rare is a Cosmic Ray event of high GeV ? Not α, but Γ that is...
How long would you have to stand in one spot on the Moon before one would hit you?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit What's a Fuyckhead? Spelling? At least I can think. trog....
Please some else step in ..I can't take this incessant babble for the weakest link here...please
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Phil Plait is a MORON
This mentally backwards nasa propaganda shill is too scared
to debate anyone in public about the FAKE MOONLANDINGS
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@receiver69 He is nice deep down. Hey Rob, am I being to eager? He says the funniest things when he's trying to be acute. Maybe he should try to be more obtuse like the nasafakedit guy.
Love your videos man!
I was watching Jarrahs 5 part series this morn',."Plait, Myth Busters & Dirty Tricks", something like that..
Really funny , one might think that this was a comedy. He comes to America, gets dismissed by Plait, then at the end when he puts the flowers in the creek and talks to it, awesome!
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision mE TO i HAD A CUZIN HOO WAZ A Sciantists to he sad thay waz fake yoo gotta a smart brane well yoo be my frend yoo smart
Hoaxslpper 1 year ago
@stalkervision Here Hassabald, remember this one?
watch?v=yMfNkbEz8ZA
Unedited in all it's glory. Hoaxheads can't stand to see this bird fly. And kids this was first developed by Rolls Royce, the same people that make them pretty cars.
Then NASA with Bell modified their design and put some G.E. engines in it, that's called R&D. Over 300 successful flights were recorded, put a rocket engine in it and,you have a Moon lander!
Thanks stalker,I'd never figure this out if it wasn't for you.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision You don't really know what a strawman is, you just heard it in one of these hoax videos.
That wouldn't be a strawman fallacy, you would have to prove NASA was inept, and you can not do that.
I think you hoaxheads are just a bunch of kids, you all have the same age on your profile and you lying about your age. Now tell me about the Cuban Missile crisis, and how you where there, pero, Yo creo que tu no eres lo que pretendes ser. Starwman !! LOLOL Tell me more about the LLRV!
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision "Do you believe there was only one person that developed the airplane the Helicopter or RADAR or the Jet engine or even the atomic bomb?"
Wait...are you saying that NASA was brilliant enough to invent this LLRV without the help of Rolls and their R&D?
NASA is inept or brillant, which is it? Gawd man you're gettin' yourself caught in your own trap.
Could you please explain your last comment, the one above, I don't want to take it out of context.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision Cuban Missile crisis?!? That happened in Oct 62'. You were there? You must be Cuban, if you are you should comprehend this.
Yo creo que tu no eres lo que pretendes ser. Entonces, cuando tengas las ideas claras podremos conversar. Pero, tu sigues asumiendo y asumir no significa que tengas la razon. Pero, yo no creo que tu seas capaz de comprender esta idea, dickhead.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision My man...NASA was trying to do VTOL's on their tails, literally facing upwards.
Where did you think all this technology came from to do the landings? Outer Mongolia?
I can tell you not that old, tell me any thing from the 60's. Give me some remote reference from the late 50's or 60's that only someone from the 60's would know.
You really don't know shit...damn, that's a bitch
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision Look at my posts and replies, now look at yours. And who's going on childish little rant with immature and infantile behavior ? That's a pretty big hole you dug for yourself Hassabald ...lol
Notice I don't rely on the personal attack fallacy, like you're ultimately reduced to using, whenever any we have any volley of words. That's what happens when you are over your head in any of this subject matter. Which pretty much encompasses the rage of facts regarding Apollo. Next..
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision Damn, you're slower than most hoaxheads stalker
Rolls invented the Bedstead in 53' NASA took that designed and walked on the backs of those Rolls engineers to come up with the LLRV, that's called development. And that development gave the NASA astronauts the skills they needed to fly the NASA Bedstead with such great equanimity.
Somebody help me here, stalker's having a little trouble figuring this out.Can anyone here explain to him this issue on a level that he can understand?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision Pro photog' they didn't know what a Hasselblad is, thought it was a Hassabald, fact one.
Apollogist' obsession with simple mistakes? Usually when a self proclaimed expert can't even spell properly the tools of his trade, that's a good indication the expert is not an expert but a prevaricator...I mean bullshitter, sorry to use big words.
Here's something that's not a hoax...You might have to thank NASA someday for your ass being here. Apophis ain't no joke! watch?v=LXV0uBfRb0A
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision Admitting you were right ? That's typical of the self diluted statements that I see coming from you often. You didn't know that Rolls invented this( watch?v=f8W2SI4c93s ) until you fell into my trap and spewed hours of nonsense about something you knew nothing about, making a fool out of yourself, priceless. Is that why you've been hiding? You ran away and hid like that after you stated you were a professional photographer, then kept calling it a "Hassabald" You too much...lol
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stalkervision Hassbald, did you enjoy this vid'...it's as unedited as you can get :
watch?v=yMfNkbEz8ZA&feature=related
Hey ..why are there no stars in this video from Jarrah?
watch?v=cBaSlLC1sIw&feature=related
Oh the irony....
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@stalkervision Nope,projecting again I see, Bedstead was a Rolls Royce design. The LLRV or LLTV as the astronauts called it, was developed by NASA and it was modified from the Rolls design. I played a trick on you and you fell for it.Point of this was,if they could do VTOL in 54' with this: watch?v=f8W2SI4c93s
They could do it in 69' in 1/6 gravity.Typical.
stalker claimed to be a Pro' photographer, then start calling the Hasselblad ... "HASSABALD" "HASSABALD" "HASSABALD" over &over !
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
you people seem like good people to ask, when are we going back to the moon? or are the sights set for Mars now?
pcvideogamer 1 year ago
ROFL!!! That was awesome, phil plait is such a fag that cant answer any questions hehe
Darklinkzelda 1 year ago
@stalkervision Hey Hassabald, you'll enjoy this vid'...it's as unedited as you can get :
watch?v=yMfNkbEz8ZA&feature=related
Hey ..why are there no stars in this video from Jarrah?
watch?v=cBaSlLC1sIw&feature=related
Oh the irony....
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
I lyk jarrah hez smart az hell I lyk stalker to hiz smart an reel intelijint lyk jarrah iz nasa iz dum
Hoaxslpper 1 year ago
@NASAvsPETE No, I'm not Plait. Quite frankly, I don't think he would bother doing this. Like how Buzz Aldrin doesn't bother responding to the obscenities and insults hoax mongers leave on his channel.
My featured video with the puppet dog was made by SuperSoylent. Did you like his video? I thought it was funny as hell.
The thought of using a dog sock puppet to "masterbate" [sic] has never crossed my mind. Very distinguished comment, Pete. True to the nature of your ilk.
DeBunx 1 year ago
It is easier to believe a lie that one has heard a thousand times than to believe a fact that no one has heard before. All these knuckleheads like Jay Windley's and Phil Plait's are bunch of liars.
schiller2222 1 year ago
@NASAvsPETE Are you Pete Stapleton, by any chance? PM me if you like. I will not reveal your ID to anyone.
If you _are_ Pete Stapleton, then I know why you spent a lot of time with Randi. You were trying, unsuccessfully, to win the Randi challenge. The Pete I'm thinking of had some "ABOVE 100% accurate" numerological something-or-other that he was constantly spamming to Usenet newsgroups about 20 years ago. Yeah, that Pete was anti-NASA, too.
So let me know.
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision Ah, okay. Well, I know nothing about the claims you (he?) make about someone's findings on what the Ektachrome film could tolerate and what it couldn't. I don't spend my time combing the literature to find something I can twist to my advantage.
I'd be better able to judge the statements if I can see the article for myself. Because every time I see such claims, it turns out that they are misrepresentative. So let me go read these findings and I'll be back.
Got a link?
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision Please give me an example of one of Jarrah's scientific arguments. I'm eager to take it on.
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision If you trace back to the initial source, of course transmissions of NASA missions come from NASA. The live TV broadcasts came from NASA astronauts on a NASA mission using NASA equipment. The fact remains that neither you nor anyone else has shown any evidence that the coverage we got was fake.
Or are you going to provide that evidence now? After all, you said my statement that no credible evidence has been presented against NASA was "stupid."
Show me.
DeBunx 1 year ago
@receiver69 I get 468,566.
DeBunx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stalkervision "Maybe you should read the dictionary about it because it has a lot of words.."
Now _there's_ a good idea! Let's seeee...Apollooo...ah, yes:
"(Astronautics) any of a series of manned US spacecraft designed to explore the moon and surrounding space. Apollo 11 made the first moon landing in July 1969."
Next suggestion?
DeBunx 1 year ago
Dawkins is passionate and strong in his belief in evolution, but when he is accosted by fundy Christians making all the same stupid accusations and asking the same questions that he has answered dozens of times, he gives them the cold shoulder.
The same is true of many climatologists when they are accosted by global warming deniers. (That's what caused "climategate.") Obama will ignore "birthers." Etc.
Only a creationist, global warming denier, or birther would consider them hypocritical.
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision Okay, so again you refuse to state what argument I made that you consider bad. I wonder why. Aren't you eager to _demonstrate_ how wrong I am and how right you are by actually refuting my argument instead of making general unsupported condemnations of it? Most people are smarter than to be fooled by that kind of tactic.
No, I am not dyslexic. Are you aphasic?
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision As promised, I am going to ask you for specifics every time you make that kind of general criticism of my arguments. Which Apollo argument do you consider "pitiful" and why?
"Checked with Clavis ! LMAO ! the Mormon bible of apologist thinking."
Why did you say that? I already said I knew that was your attitude. Now, have you looked at the pictures? Regardless of _who_ posted them, the conclusion is obvious. Did they paste stripes on the flag picture?
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision How about now? You keep saying my pro-Apollo arguments are bad. Please cite one and let's discuss it.
I'm going to make this request every time you make one of those comments.
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision Use the reply button.
You know, it really isn't very credible to just keep repeating how bad you think someone's arguments are instead of making a legitimate attempt to refute them. Why don't you respond to whatever argument I made and _back up_ that assertion? Show everybody _why_ my argument is jejune. Or do you just not feel up to that kind of honest debate?
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision And you say MY arguments are bad? If you check the Clavius site, you will see this discussed. It doesn't matter whether you have already condemned the author of that site, the pictures he shows are OBVIOUS examples of how light areas bleed over the fiducials. You can see several examples of how they are _partially_ obscured.
Do you really think they would paste white stripes on a picture of the flag after it was made?
Geez, I can't believe you still make this argument!
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision Who are you talking to?
(Okay, I guess you get the point by now. Or maybe not.)
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision Who are you talking to?
DeBunx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stalkervision Who are you talking to?
DeBunx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stalkervision Who are you talking to?
DeBunx 1 year ago
@stalkervision Who are you talking to?
DeBunx 1 year ago