And the last little tidbit is cute, but I can write a computer program to calculate how many times you would have to pull the lever to get it to be so. Unlikely yes, impossible no.
I sometimes write computer programs to test different ideas of evolution and different effects on it.
So you designed a computer program to calculate how many times you would have to pull the lever until someone becomes a winner so that others will willingly give their money to obtain the same computer generated result.
You are very special as I can say with certainty that there is no way to write an Apple Computer program to test evolution or abiogenesis. It would be the same as writing a program on tiny fairies behind the looking glass. They all don't exist.
I can and I have made computer programs testing Natural Selection, and I can say very surely that Evolution by Natural Selection is very disturbingly true by observation.
Abiogenesis is what you are looking for if you want answered on how life arose, not evolution.
Start = Abiogenesis
Complexity = Evolution
Two completely different things. Just wikipedia it to see how they differ.
You can say 'very surely' by your computer model program that Natural Selection is true by observation. Hey you should publish your computer model and is results for you would be the first man on earth to be very sure is true.
I know about abiogenesis being the cause of life and evolution or how the original life form became you and all other animal life.
Risky, no? Simply it is inviting a subject that keeps getting beaten down every 5 seconds.
I will look more into ID if you can design an experiment which I can test the theory of it. If it can't be tested, then I will stick with Abiogenesis and Evolution.
I recognize the Dawkins part confirming ID. The question originally was "Can you think of how Intelligent Design is Possible?" Its true, look it up! Also, there was a bit of Scientist Rhetoric, but what else can you get from scientists.
I can design an experiment to test ID if you can design a real experiment proving abiogenesis or evolution. Urey, et al tried with all their intelligence and using what they thought were primordial gases, temperatures, electrical currents etc. All they got was a carbon string of things resembling amino acids and not LIFE.
Yes I can think that ID is possible based on the circumstantial evidence of our life forms. I can think of nothing that proves evolution or life arising from innate material.
Ugh... this movie makes me want to puke. It's anti-science propaganda is an embarrassment to mankind's intelligence.
DeathsWill228 1 year ago
wow, this has to be about the only pro video about this documentary I've seen on youtube. There need to be more....
Michcool125 2 years ago
...
stonerj0e 2 years ago
hey ! if evolution is really true , then i can just go kill everyone i hate and not worry about a damn thing ! :) WOOOOOOOOOO !!!!
stonerj0e 2 years ago
And the last little tidbit is cute, but I can write a computer program to calculate how many times you would have to pull the lever to get it to be so. Unlikely yes, impossible no.
I sometimes write computer programs to test different ideas of evolution and different effects on it.
But sadly, not convinced.
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
So you designed a computer program to calculate how many times you would have to pull the lever until someone becomes a winner so that others will willingly give their money to obtain the same computer generated result.
You are very special as I can say with certainty that there is no way to write an Apple Computer program to test evolution or abiogenesis. It would be the same as writing a program on tiny fairies behind the looking glass. They all don't exist.
onycho1 3 years ago
Strawman argument.
I can and I have made computer programs testing Natural Selection, and I can say very surely that Evolution by Natural Selection is very disturbingly true by observation.
Abiogenesis is what you are looking for if you want answered on how life arose, not evolution.
Start = Abiogenesis
Complexity = Evolution
Two completely different things. Just wikipedia it to see how they differ.
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
There is nothing 'strawman' about my statement.
You can say 'very surely' by your computer model program that Natural Selection is true by observation. Hey you should publish your computer model and is results for you would be the first man on earth to be very sure is true.
I know about abiogenesis being the cause of life and evolution or how the original life form became you and all other animal life.
onycho1 3 years ago
These theories are poor but all that SCIENTISTS have come up with to explain what cannot be proven.
Wikipedia is not a valid source of information as any kook on the net can contribute his or her concepts.
onycho1 3 years ago
Risky, no? Simply it is inviting a subject that keeps getting beaten down every 5 seconds.
I will look more into ID if you can design an experiment which I can test the theory of it. If it can't be tested, then I will stick with Abiogenesis and Evolution.
I recognize the Dawkins part confirming ID. The question originally was "Can you think of how Intelligent Design is Possible?" Its true, look it up! Also, there was a bit of Scientist Rhetoric, but what else can you get from scientists.
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
I can design an experiment to test ID if you can design a real experiment proving abiogenesis or evolution. Urey, et al tried with all their intelligence and using what they thought were primordial gases, temperatures, electrical currents etc. All they got was a carbon string of things resembling amino acids and not LIFE.
Yes I can think that ID is possible based on the circumstantial evidence of our life forms. I can think of nothing that proves evolution or life arising from innate material.
onycho1 3 years ago