Added: 2 years ago
From: chilipeps2
Views: 18,533
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (117)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1. The poster screwed up any legitamacy the song could have had by saying its a cut from Abbey Road when any Beatles fan knows that a song like this would have never been on Abbey Road.

    2. The Beatles (not even Paul) would have never wrote a song like this, its not their style.

    3. Everything about it from crummy instrumentation to lack of lyrics screams amateur band, even Beatles demos sound more professional.

    4. The song sounds very 70's with someone attempting to immitate Paul's voice.

  • This is not only NOT the Beatles, this is a very bad knockoff/ripoff of their sounds circa 1965.

  • it is not the beatles

  • Not the Beatles. But not a bad song.

  • WTF?????????????

  • Not even close to the Beatles!!!

  • If that's the Beatles, I'm the Queen of Sheba

  • Sounds more like Elo or Chicago, or something. But not the Beatles. How ever, I like it.

  • Holy  krapp!!

  • Very Beatle-esque, but not them. You can hear that this guy is clearly not Paul and this isn't their style at all.

  • This is the Beatles? It kinda sounds like their voices but not really like what they would write... whatever. The Beatles were weird, but awesome! This could so be them!!

  • M0re of a Beat Up than a Beatles (and you just wanna shoot that fn flute player)

  • It's not as good as "Deck Chair." ;-)

  • What is the proof that this is the Beatles ? The flute is mixed way out in the front. WHo is on the electric piano ? Where are the song credits ?

  • Beatlesque but not The beatles.

  • This is still a good song, even though it's not The Beatles :P

  • @AndrewHaddock

    I concur.

  • I don't know ,if is only the beatles name, is an amazing song

  • This is a good song, even if not beatles. I like it, personally.

  • fake

  • Regardless of it being an obvious fake... I really like the song. The mellotron sounds cool.

  • Uh, no. This is not the Beatles.

  • In the 1970's there weren't that much unreleased studio outtakes floating around, so the bootleggers made up new songs and released them as the Beatles.

    Some of them (Peace of Mind)convinced people, while other (this one) were just plain fake.

  • Man, not even close! In the 70's a lot of limp wristed pretty boys attempted the Beatles 'Paul' sound cause nobody could do Lennon. Now with the passage of time these people who painstakenly produced this recording attempted to take advantage of that and try 'er again! With the Rock Band game a younger set of fakes have surfaced. Anyone familiar with Beatles works know that this song isn't Beatles. Almost a nice shot but not melodic enough. Actually it's very funny!

  • I love this song but its NOT The Beatles sounds kinda like Badfinger or the Pete Best Band but ti is a very good song indeed

  • I love this song but its NOT The Beatles sounds kinda like Badfinger or the Pete Best Band

  • Lots of haters it seems; they did have songs that weren't A-sides people...

  • who is this?!?!?

  • This is clearly a total fake.

  • did they say crap? and i think this song sucks!

  • WHAT ARE YOU KIDDING??? THIS IS NO WAY THE BEATLES!!!!!!!

  • Folks, this is not The Beatles, but someone's weak attempt at sounding like them. Listen to the vibrato; the beatles never used vibrato in their singing. SHAM!!

  • I just read a book about unreleased Beatles songs and no mention of this. I don't think it is the Beatles

  • not beatles

  • I can actually hear hints of Paul Mcatney's voice

  • Bull shit! Get a life, this is not the sound of the 60's or 70's. I am a recording engineer, worked at EMI (abbey road), Olympic and even sat in on an Apple session. Not only is this not any of the Beatles, it is not even in their type of writing style, even the throw away stuff they did has some merit! I really hate when people try their 15 minutes of fame deceiving the public. Oh and it's not Badfinger, as-well!

  • Sounds more Badfinger. Definitely not the Beatles.

  • Not The Beatles. Clearly ...

  • Sounds like Badfinger-lol.

  • This ain't the beatles ladies and gentlemen. The recording doesn't sound anything like it did in the 60s, plus this sounds NOTHING like McCartney!

  • @DantesTear

    When he's singing solo at the very beginning he DOES...but with the others he doesn't

  • @DantesTear think you're very right - it's a good try (and not a bad song as well), but the voices are from no one I know!

  • Incidentally, if in fact this song is not an authentic Beatles song, the true author ought to take the credit for penning it; it is quite good and Beatles-passable in my opinion.

  • Commentators, if you look closely you will see there is no mention of this recording being a Beatles outtake; instead, it says it is an unreleased Beatles song (apparently recorded by someone else). My question to the poster is where and how he/she got hold of the song so that someone could record it.

  • Not a bad outfake. But why bother calling it a Beatles song? Just bring it out yourselves under your own name.

  • @paulisdead yeah, this guy could have made a bunch of money if he just released it himself

  • If this is a Beatles outtake I'm Santa Claus

  • @Tricheco96 Hey Santa! Can you get me A Paul McCartney Concert ticket for me for Christmas? :P Thanks!

  • beatles it is not

  • If this is a real Beatles outtake (I'm not going to debate it), wouldn't it have been from earlier?

    It just doesn't sound like something that would have been on Abbey Road. It sounds more like the earlier work. It is a very nice song, though. Where did you find it?

  • @joethulhuz my uncles owned a record/cd store since 1965 and unfortunately it closed down a couple years ago. he said it was in a pile of just crap that he found, it was a limited edition promotional vinyl distributed by the record company but it was immediately ripped off store shelves and sent back to company

  • Comment removed

  • @chilipeps2 Nice try. If it was a real Beatles promo, they would have sent it out to more than just one store. A new release from the worlds biggest band at the time wouldn't have just slipped under the radar like that. DJ's and bootlegers would have been all over it like a rash (a la the 'Get Back' LP) and it would have been a canonized rarity decades ago.

  • @chilipeps2 So you have no idea who did this song?

  • @chilipeps2 Quote:" it was a limited edition promotional vinyl distributed by the record company but it was immediately ripped off store shelves and sent back to company"

    You must think that we are all as stupid as you are! LOL!

  • @joethulhuz This is NOT the Beatles.

  • @McCartnee OF COURSE NOT. I was speaking HYPOTHETICALLY.

  • Didn't convince me. The title doesn't strike me as typical of the Beatles and the song is weak for their caliber, as was playing & singing. Although, I thought I heard Paul a few times.

  • bullshit

  • This is not the Beatles.

  • good song beatles or not.

  • Hmm..it's hard to find out if this IS The Beatles..The Beatles were the one who were the famous "Oooh" and the instruments are different then there usall..That's not Ringo on Drums, because we all know that his beat is waaaay different but he could have open up a new drum beat..so I guess no one will know the real answer, Thumbs up if you agree!

  • oh, no! This is NOT the Beatles!!!

  • Nah, voices don't sound like them at all and there is no record of this tune anywhere I can find.

  • that is not Ringo on the drums....

  • dose anyone have Paul or Ringos Email adress becaus i wanna ask them if is real?

  • is this really the beatles

  • Where did you get this,?? O.O

    i believe this is the Beatles,, so shut up you haters!!! >.<

  • too boring to be a beatle song

    sorry...

  • @evangelo66 are u kidding its great and it is the beatles cuz that sounds like paul at the beggining

  • @MsBobohj its a cute song, beatles alike, but i stil thing that these aint the boys.

  • LOL WOW, not even close!

  • terrible fake

  • Nope, not the Beatles. Nice scam to get views, though.

  • this is so obviously not the Beatles!!! I have no idea why you would present it as a Beatles song 0_o you're clearly not a fan of them!!!

  • Hey Chilipeps2, this is a fake and you know it. Stop the misrepresentin' and take it down or correct your description.

  • @Flasoo8 i would sir if it was indeed a misrepresentation but sir it is not so please stop talking bullshit

  • @chilipeps2 Dude, every comment here is about how this is not the Beatles! The only bullshit here is you representing this as a Beatles song when you clearly know that it is not! The Beatles deserve better from you.

  • @Flasoo8 for every unreleased beatles song they say its not real, peoples first responses are always to doubt. why do i give a crap whether you all think its fake? believe what you want

  • @chilipeps2 um people can tell if its fake or not.

    for example:

    "whats the new mary jane"

    with it on bootlegs in like the 70s

    they asked john lennon about it in 1980,

    he said that he wanted it on the white album and they left it unrleased because paul didnt like it.

    none of the beatles ever recorded a song called heartache.

    i have a book at home that has every recording session o0f the beatles.

    if it was an outtake, it would be on anthology ( just like "whats the new mary jane)

  • @Burromovie there will always be more beatle outtakes foo. suck it up

  • @chilipeps2 uh yeah okay...

    just letting you know that the only abbey road outtakes unreleased are gene vincents "who slapped john" and "be bop a lula"

  • @Burromovie lol ok budday>..........

  • you have to be kiddin'....NOT the Beatles of course.

  • Sounds more like Badfinger.

  • Bonzo Dog Band, I guess.

  • this sounds like wings

  • Bollocks!  This is just NOT the Beatles.

    And the song sucks too!

  • @junaid1

    song doesn`t suck!

    but i should agree it`s not the beatles

  • what a joke any idiot knows this is not the beatles

  • Nope,.. not beatles, but funny, yeah maybe Badfinger

  • Klaatu?

  • nope just beatles

  • @chilipeps2 - Nope, definately NOT The Beatles.

  • like Badfinger

  • This really isn't the beatles. Sounds nothing like their voices.

  • This Is not the Beatles

  • nope

  • Not even close!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Doesn't sound like the Beatles AT ALL!!!

  • nice try just rename the titel in beatles style or something

  • not sure who ever told you this was a Beatles track.. this song never came from the Lennon/McCartney catalogue at all. Sounds like a poor studio session by badfinger before they became popular or one of the many beatles wannabe's in the late 60s/early 70s.. who never made it.

  • What`s the deal with all this fake Beatle stuff on Youtube??

  • Sounds like the Zombies.

  • Not even close to being the Beatles.

  • man, another fake beatles thing. If i heard this on the radio, I would never think it was the Beatles.

  • never ever the Beatles....

  • Comment removed

  • not the beatles

  • if you say so :/

  • who is it by? it sounds like the beatles.

  • it is the beatles...

  • well you agreed with seagullshame.

  • sarcasm lol

  • is this the beatles,or a bootleg? because i'm making a cd compilation of unreleased beatles songs,and i'd like to include this one,but i want to know that is defo a beatles song.

  • yup its a real unreleased song

  • Is this really the Beatles?

  • yep

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more