I believe if we meet some alien and ask them about their history they too would have their own versions of Mosses, Jesus, Mohammad, Buddah and all the non sense in their past.
@Tabbimura Not really. Aliens would have a totally different evolution and there is a good chance they would not believe in the supernatural. Early humans did not always believe in the supernatural until some kook who did with power forced everyone under them, and from there on history goes on. There is sentient humans today who don't believe in the supernatural. They are called athiests
Pt. 2 of 2. Like having our own keys to the cosmos. Pondering his advanced theories. I imagine stephens only limited by the laws of gravity his mind is free not physically bound or restrained to this planet. Possibly the future evolution of humanity to be limitless & uncensored a sunday drive through the cosmos will be a common practice in a distance future. I absolutely adore you Stephen! :)
Pt. 1 of 2: Stephen Hawking a phenomena, a rare occurrence, a genius mind so stellar, cosmic, so advanced beyond earthy knowledge that these earthly vessels we refer to as human bodies, cannot support his advanced developed brain functions. Possibly a visitor among us from a far off realm with an intrinsic theoretician & algebraic gift, shared with those more academic humans among us
I think every living kind, is making an evolution towards the infinity with no stop.
trough the years we experience the needs of knowing, giving the next generation an simple information of many years of research.
So we (humans) become a creature that within millions of years of revolution; creature's with ''mind blowing'' amount of intelligence, as something basic in life.
“And those who disbelieved will be driven to Hell in groups until, when they reach it, its gates are opened and its keepers will say: ‘Did there not come to you messengers from yourselves, reciting to you the verses of your Lord and warning you of the meeting of this Day of yours?’ They will say: ‘Yes, but the word (i.e., decree) of punishment has come into effect upon the disbelievers.’” (Qur'an 39:71)
“The Day they will emerge from the graves rapidly as if they were, toward an erected idol, hastening. Their eyes humbled, humiliation will cover them. That is the Day which they had been promised.” (Qur'an 70:43)
Do some travel to the ancient sights and you will see its obvious that theyve been here before, and recorded with the promise they will come back. A species that fights with itself is a doomed species. Good and evil pull tension like a tug of war. Tension grows and snaps...both sides will fall. it would be a lost cause without divine intervention to pull the sides together to form a balance. An old story thats been repeated around the world
Its such a shame Hawking has Gehrig's Disease......we're all going to get robbed of some years from maybe the only guy who can answer these questions for us.
maybe a dying civilization/planet just sent some sort of ship to this planet with life onboard hoping life will survive on this planet , i think thats where we came from
theres a really good program called acient aliens and if you watch that there are very hard evidence that aliens help us (the last 20 mins of that program is retarded)
see, I really have to disagree wtih stephen hawking here. I think some divine intervention created life, not by random collisions of amino acids. Hoyle said, "The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein."
@nybombs And you really really "believe" that some invisible magic entity just went poof ... and magically created life? LOL Me thinks you really need to learn a bit more about what science has actually discovered my friend. There is no need for invisible magic entities in this universe. Humans made it up to answer questions they couldn't answer and as those questions are now being answered with evidence and facts, you magic entity is shrinking to nothing and is no longer viable.
@RhondaH That is what I believe, and there is no reason to mock me for it. These are all theories, not facts. Having studied biology and learning how complex life is, I think it is impossible by some random chance did life originate. Let's all keep it civil, please :)
@nybombs You are certainly entitled to believe anything you like, but I am also entitled to LOL at your beliefs because IMO they are silly and you lack any evidence to support them. Why would you think my difference of opinion is uncivil? Did I call you names? Did I use bad language? No. I simply challenged your opinion and you call that uncivil. LOL Remember I also have a right to my opinion too.
Sir Fred Hoyle isn't the greatest of authorities on abiogenesis. He was an astronomer and a mathematician. Not a chemist nor a biologist. I seriously doubt that you'd go to an auto-mechanic to get a brain-surgery (which equates quite well to using an astronomer in an argument of chemistry).
And while the chances are slim (for finding a life-supporting planet) the process have possibly googolplexes of planets to work on so eventually it will happen.
its funny how all these scientist people think they know how life started and think they know how the univers started but dont you think it would be way easier finding out hwo the fisrt person on earth was i meen look at all this complex stuff they found out but finding out who the first person doesnt seem
@tisilwm They already have. From what we know people came from apes / monkeys of some sort. We then evolved to neanderthals (I'm pretty sure we had earlier figures than neanderthals, I just can't remember what they were)
@tisilwm The oldest human bones found were located in Africa. When the bones of two early humans were found in 1967 near Kibish, Ethiopia, they were thought to be 130,000 years old. A few years ago, researchers found 154,000- to 160,000-year-old human bones at Herto, Ethiopia. Now, a new study of the 1967 fossil site indicates the earliest known members of our species, Homo sapiens, roamed Africa about 195,000 years ago. This was from 2005 article science.
big bang is just a theory not the truth, all of this is just theory not fact, because he dont' believe in God, science discovered that the world is circle and not flat, but 2700 years ago it was already written in the bible that the earth is circle.
Isaiah 40: 21-22 It is He who sits above the circle Of the Earth
Also read the book of Job, he tell us that the earth isn't supported with anything but it is HUNG upon NOTHING. science discovered this just lately but the bible speaks the truth
@jovenamago Everyone has their own opinion. I'm not a religious person nor do I have anything against people that are, I actually believe that faith is needed because sadly, alot of people would be lost without it. However, I don't feel it's exactly honest for you to say what is a theory and what is not. If people choose to believe in the big bang theory allow them to, just as you would like to be allowed to stand by your choice. Also, a piece of information that might be useful:
@jovenamago Don't fight science with religion, or fight religion with science. You can not expect one who believes in facts to believe the bible as he prefers logical explanations over higher beings such as God, nor can you expect a religious person to put away his faith and only look at facts. Furthermore; there is no evidence that the uneducated masses believed in a flat earth, this was just a myth that originated in the 19th century and was believed worldwide. It still is, by most.
@Samprzz wait, are you saying there still are people believing that whole "earth is flat" theory? i respect most people's opinions if they're logical... but come on.. earth being flat? really? and also, i think it was developed way before 19th century.
@xxslaayyahhxx No I meant that there were barely any people who believed the earth was flat to begin with. What I meant with 'It still is, by most', is that most people still believe that alot of people -used- to believe the earth was flat, which simply isn't true.. Most of them knew it wasn't flat, and that's that =P
@Samprzz What is you talking about? It is well documented that people worldwide believed in a flat world in the past until science proved that earth is round. It is even understandable because it seems like that by the naked eye alone.
@firespinguy By that reasoning you should believe everything that has been written down. Let me just link this (I actually hate linking it because it's from Wikipedia, I only do it because I know it to be true):
The misconception that educated people at the time of Columbus believed in a flat Earth has been referred to as The Myth of the Flat Earth.
The idea that educated men at the time of Columbus believed that the earth was flat remains one of the hardiest errors in teaching.
I don't fight science with religion, what I'm trying to say is that science and religion don not contradict and it's possible that science and religion are the same true, like what I'm saying that the earth is billions of years like science said, and bible said the a day is a thousand years for God, so when He create the universe, galaxy, and the earth, it's not 7 earth days but days of God, If you will compare science and religion you would notice that they have the same views :P
How is it more logical or likely that life formed somewhere else than on earth and then was carried here? I'm sceptical about theories that explain presence of things on earth by asteroids, like water or life in this case. It just seems too easy to me because even if it did not appear here first, you still have to answer the question how it appeared somewhere else. You can't just say '' Oh it came from space, problem solved''. It doesn't answer the real question, ''how was life formed''.
@nichols1994 It's one of the possible answers, but not the most likely. Over the time, humans have proven to be very effective at convincing themself that gods exists. It's just our nature, we need to believe...
@nichols1994 Maybe humans dont have the ultimate answers.... yet, but that doesn't mean to say a 'god' had anything to do with it. It just means we do not know yet. god's were only created by human imagination based on very very old ways of thinking and it seems religious people think 'if it can't be explained, it must be gods work'.... and even if it can be explained, its still gods work. God = imaginary friend for adults.
@sleepwalker2112 i think its all luck ,i meen you have no idea how huge the universe is so many planets so so many. so. lets say it is luck .say 1 in a billion chance of life forming . lets say theres 30 billion planets just random planets so the odds of life starting one in a billlion so shouldent there be 30 planets with some form of life on them and even if it isnt one in a billion it could be one in a trillion but still there is so many planets that life could be anywhere
If the universes is compared to the varying different forms of life on earth; The true question should be what are the possibilities of other universes? Maybe looking @ the bigger picture we can possible answer the more pressing question of life in our universe.
When he said that its hard to believe that life just came out of now where made me believe that religion is fake, what a pitty that all these people think it is real.
I liked Into the Universe with SH the best, it goes on to describe much of the science through more solid groundings rather than speculation. This episode though seems a bit far fetched as far as the lifeforms go. I'd like to be absolutely certain about biological evolution on different variables rather than just say 'they COULD exist' . Of course these documentaries are just flexing their CGI muscles most of the time.
Whats great about this series, is that in many science documentaries, are dumbed down, and only have an overview, while this show looks at detail and is very open minded. I watch many shows about astrobiology, and only Earth-like life is shown (I know that our best chance of finding life is by looking for Earth-like planets because the really alien life would be more difficult to recorgnise, but still this show is very detailed and looks at many possibilities).
I find it entertaining that modern humans had only been around for little more than 200,000 years and yet our most advanced technology had existed for a 100 or less depending on who you ask.
And the most intricate sciences had been in the development for the last 20 to 30 or so years. To an alien civilisation they must be going, WTF had you been doing the last 200,000 years?!
We are fed a sanitized view of the history of technology (though that would be true of all the history that looms in the forefront of most people).
The truth is that most scientific discoveries--for example, human flight--have been almost immediately re-purposed for war. Airplanes were used to drop bombs, and for the first time in history, even women and children were deliberately bombed and burned alive.
Science and it's applications (what we call "technology") was in fact carried out in the distant past, and (I would imagine) far more than we have evidence for today--BUT it was kept secret, and for good reason. One of the reasons, as mentioned in #1, was that it would quickly be abused for inter-personal murder, injury and torture, on whatever scale. The first cases of chemical warfare in WWI come to mind.
Twenty-two centuries ago, a King in the Orient, after winning a war using techniques made possible by natural laws deciphered, felt compelled toward a massive effort to forbid scientific knowledge to be purposed for war. He established a secret society of nine "scientists" who were to remain hidden, and who would be replaced by appropriately groomed men with the passage of time. He also established hospitals for animals, and spread vegetarianism.
I find it amusing that civilizations will take such a long time to notice that the grains in which provide them food, and the wood which provide them fire and shelter, are depleted and force them to make an effort to establish peaceful harvesting and replenishing before they realize that the wars were foaght only because there were 'plenty' and that peace will be achieved only because there is 'no more'. But through the famine come the feeding of the mind.
and mindkind will lift themselves into a high plane of existence where the soil need not be from the ground, and the ether allow for expansion of their existence through the manipulation and understanding of the atom and our one sun of many stars become many suns of all stars.
And mankind will realize that they are one of many peoples of these stars divided only by spacetime.
There are other things that exist around us that are just as likely as the creation of life. When someone wins the big prize in the lotto the odds are also huge but enough people play to produce a winner. What I'm saying is that just because people find it hard to imagine that life can be created spontaneously doesn't mean that it didn't.
Amazing how big the universe really is, 1:21 - 2:37 blow my mind! I knew the universe was big but we are like a atom in the middle of hundreds of football fields.. When it comes to how small we are to 2:37 lol
they have allready made time machines all over if you read the focus mag,they testing at the north pole i have pictures here now focus from 2006,and they have one in japan a neutrino detector,good stuff
such a brilliant man..and the fact he puts God in the mix changed my whole outlook on "the big bang" I always considered it to be something that disproved Gods creation. im no holy roller, but i believe in God and i find it AMAZING that a man of this brilliance credits God for this work. such a wonderful man
@bamboostinger Well, this type of thing just recently sparked my interest. Just because somebody has a high IQ, does not mean that they know everything.
Wow I think Stephen Hawking is a brilliant guy but to hear him try so hard to deny the existence of a creator just makes me cringe. He is a mathematician, but claims that random amino acids could have bumped against each other enough times to produce DNA, RNA or even a single cell organism that was able to reproduce? The level of complexity and instruction found within a single strand of DNA is the equivalent of a tornado sweeping through and a junk yard and accidentally building a Rolls Royce.
@moali68 I think you missed what he was saying. With inifinte possibilities comes infinite outcomes. Take sodium and chloride, chloride is deadly by its self but with the right amount of sodium you get salt. What are the odds of the right amount of chloride and sodium mixing together and creating salt?
@moali68 Might I ask, but where do you get your statistics from? It has been shown in laboratory settings that by recreating what early earth was like in terms of chemistry; air concentration, composition, and temperature, we observe that amino acids such as DNA and RNA actually form spontaneously on their own. And, it has been repeated in experiment time and time again. Does this seem like an unlikely occurrence to you?
@GammaRay6626 please provide a link. The complexity of one strand of DNA is not within the realm of random occurrence even after a million years of random collisions. Stephen Hawking is a numbers guy he knows this. Also I mentioned that not only does the DNA have to create itself it must do so in a manner that allows it to pass information to a copy of itself so that it can reproduce and continue to reproduce.
@moali68 Seriously, take a look at a modern physics textbook. Once. Heisenberg's Uncertainly Principle clearly gives way for the modern laws of physics and chemistry, coupled with statistics, to form as many a complex molecule as can exist. DNA is NOT the only self replicating molecule. The amount of documentation of the "spontaneous" and "improbable" formation of organic compounds is copious with a bit of effort, which you seem to deny. Nearly anything is within the realm of random occurrence.
@moali68 Life did not have to begin with DNA, and in fact it most likely didn't. Any molecule capable of self-replication would suffice. Yes, that event would probably be extremely unlikely. But there are more stars than sand grains on all the beaches of the planet. Given a sheer number like that, the improbable may become inevitable. And, of course, once the first self-replicating molecules arose, the non-random process of natural selection could take over.
@moali68 Also, not only was there an abundance of planets for the origin of life to occur, but an abundance of time. You say, "even after a million years", but there were hundreds of millions of years just on the earth for the first life to arise. And that's just on one planet.
@GammaRay6626 DNA and RNA are not made of amino acids, but nucleic acids and phosphorylated sugars. You're correct about amino acids being easily made, and they are the building blocks of our bodies. The DNA is the blueprint of those amino acids, which then link together to form proteins.
HOLY SHIT WERE FREAKIN X1,000,000,000,000 MICROSCOPIC SIZE!!!!!!!
EntetieZ143 1 year ago
@EntetieZ143 micro is 10^-6 so were 10^0 or 1, therefore, we're 10^6 bigger or 1,000,000 idk wut math you are using
ryank8843 1 year ago
@ryank8843 dude i didnt literally mean it, i jst said it cuz when they kept goin back and back were basicly like nothing so yeah......
EntetieZ143 1 year ago
Three goddamn Hillbillys disliked this.. simply stunning documentation, exactly that kind for what i was looking for!
tritratulalal 1 year ago
I believe if we meet some alien and ask them about their history they too would have their own versions of Mosses, Jesus, Mohammad, Buddah and all the non sense in their past.
muzammilali007 1 year ago
@muzammilali007
Believe in supernaturals is a part of being sentient. So technically alien species would have "The chosen one" thing in their mind.
Tabbimura 1 year ago
@Tabbimura Not really. Aliens would have a totally different evolution and there is a good chance they would not believe in the supernatural. Early humans did not always believe in the supernatural until some kook who did with power forced everyone under them, and from there on history goes on. There is sentient humans today who don't believe in the supernatural. They are called athiests
firespinguy 1 year ago
The Universe Wins
jmm1233 1 year ago
if we met them it would be the downfall of religion!:D
barr65 1 year ago
@barr65 unless they bring their own. lol!
ceezmad1 1 year ago
Pt. 2 of 2. Like having our own keys to the cosmos. Pondering his advanced theories. I imagine stephens only limited by the laws of gravity his mind is free not physically bound or restrained to this planet. Possibly the future evolution of humanity to be limitless & uncensored a sunday drive through the cosmos will be a common practice in a distance future. I absolutely adore you Stephen! :)
StandsInTheLight 1 year ago
Pt. 1 of 2: Stephen Hawking a phenomena, a rare occurrence, a genius mind so stellar, cosmic, so advanced beyond earthy knowledge that these earthly vessels we refer to as human bodies, cannot support his advanced developed brain functions. Possibly a visitor among us from a far off realm with an intrinsic theoretician & algebraic gift, shared with those more academic humans among us
StandsInTheLight 1 year ago
Comment removed
StandsInTheLight 1 year ago
Comment removed
StandsInTheLight 1 year ago
Comment removed
JONNOG88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Although I cannot move and have to speak through a computer, in my mind I am free." I always get the chills everytime I hear it.
Jeeyo12345 1 year ago
I think every living kind, is making an evolution towards the infinity with no stop.
trough the years we experience the needs of knowing, giving the next generation an simple information of many years of research.
So we (humans) become a creature that within millions of years of revolution; creature's with ''mind blowing'' amount of intelligence, as something basic in life.
MrJunkDeluxe 1 year ago
if they keep on zooming out, at the beginning, it's homer's head lol
XxAcknowledgexX 1 year ago
if aliens exist we're considered aliens to them so be careful in how you use that term
MrGaberthegamer 1 year ago
“And those who disbelieved will be driven to Hell in groups until, when they reach it, its gates are opened and its keepers will say: ‘Did there not come to you messengers from yourselves, reciting to you the verses of your Lord and warning you of the meeting of this Day of yours?’ They will say: ‘Yes, but the word (i.e., decree) of punishment has come into effect upon the disbelievers.’” (Qur'an 39:71)
thedivinedecree 1 year ago
“The Day they will emerge from the graves rapidly as if they were, toward an erected idol, hastening. Their eyes humbled, humiliation will cover them. That is the Day which they had been promised.” (Qur'an 70:43)
thedivinedecree 1 year ago
Nothing only happens once in science, so if Intelligent life arose here on this planet we call the earth, sure it arose and will arise on others.
puppydog88 1 year ago
he reuses the same footage in each episode. It's kinda funny when you notice it
Xloi63 1 year ago
Do some travel to the ancient sights and you will see its obvious that theyve been here before, and recorded with the promise they will come back. A species that fights with itself is a doomed species. Good and evil pull tension like a tug of war. Tension grows and snaps...both sides will fall. it would be a lost cause without divine intervention to pull the sides together to form a balance. An old story thats been repeated around the world
JedNZ 1 year ago
Its such a shame Hawking has Gehrig's Disease......we're all going to get robbed of some years from maybe the only guy who can answer these questions for us.
GeorgesRushStPierre 1 year ago
stephen hawkings is stupid.
IKTPQKILLSYOU8520 1 year ago
@IKTPQKILLSYOU8520
Why?
MetalDarkElf 1 year ago
Comment removed
JONNOG88 1 year ago
What a pile of new world order propaganda puke. at least thats what i see and hear.
Stephen Hawking you are a puppet with a puppeteer that has a broken hand.
TheTrueJBV3737 1 year ago
@TheTrueJBV3737
Yeah having an opinion and while looking at nice star animations has everything to do with a new world order.
/sadface
kutzak159 1 year ago
maybe a dying civilization/planet just sent some sort of ship to this planet with life onboard hoping life will survive on this planet , i think thats where we came from
pppaullll 1 year ago
i love these types of documentary, so awsome! :)
ShinyMew151 1 year ago
this is awesome and very interesting
ipader2010 1 year ago
Mr HAWKINGS I WILL TELL ONCE. THERE are sophisticated alien in the vast universe. ITS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT TRUE. They are so advanced than ours.
coolferds06 1 year ago
Not content with fucking up this planet...
ProfitsBeforePeople 1 year ago
theres a really good program called acient aliens and if you watch that there are very hard evidence that aliens help us (the last 20 mins of that program is retarded)
Shut0w3n 1 year ago
this is soo cool!!!!!!all of these videos are cool 10 out of 10!!!make more videos
james65508 1 year ago
see, I really have to disagree wtih stephen hawking here. I think some divine intervention created life, not by random collisions of amino acids. Hoyle said, "The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein."
nybombs 1 year ago
@nybombs And you really really "believe" that some invisible magic entity just went poof ... and magically created life? LOL Me thinks you really need to learn a bit more about what science has actually discovered my friend. There is no need for invisible magic entities in this universe. Humans made it up to answer questions they couldn't answer and as those questions are now being answered with evidence and facts, you magic entity is shrinking to nothing and is no longer viable.
RhondaH 1 year ago
@RhondaH That is what I believe, and there is no reason to mock me for it. These are all theories, not facts. Having studied biology and learning how complex life is, I think it is impossible by some random chance did life originate. Let's all keep it civil, please :)
nybombs 1 year ago
@nybombs You are certainly entitled to believe anything you like, but I am also entitled to LOL at your beliefs because IMO they are silly and you lack any evidence to support them. Why would you think my difference of opinion is uncivil? Did I call you names? Did I use bad language? No. I simply challenged your opinion and you call that uncivil. LOL Remember I also have a right to my opinion too.
RhondaH 1 year ago
@nybombs
Sir Fred Hoyle isn't the greatest of authorities on abiogenesis. He was an astronomer and a mathematician. Not a chemist nor a biologist. I seriously doubt that you'd go to an auto-mechanic to get a brain-surgery (which equates quite well to using an astronomer in an argument of chemistry).
And while the chances are slim (for finding a life-supporting planet) the process have possibly googolplexes of planets to work on so eventually it will happen.
jxvwp 1 year ago
its funny how all these scientist people think they know how life started and think they know how the univers started but dont you think it would be way easier finding out hwo the fisrt person on earth was i meen look at all this complex stuff they found out but finding out who the first person doesnt seem
that hard
tisilwm 1 year ago
@tisilwm They already have. From what we know people came from apes / monkeys of some sort. We then evolved to neanderthals (I'm pretty sure we had earlier figures than neanderthals, I just can't remember what they were)
iAmKEIS 1 year ago
@tisilwm The oldest human bones found were located in Africa. When the bones of two early humans were found in 1967 near Kibish, Ethiopia, they were thought to be 130,000 years old. A few years ago, researchers found 154,000- to 160,000-year-old human bones at Herto, Ethiopia. Now, a new study of the 1967 fossil site indicates the earliest known members of our species, Homo sapiens, roamed Africa about 195,000 years ago. This was from 2005 article science.
Tortuga699 1 year ago
big bang is just a theory not the truth, all of this is just theory not fact, because he dont' believe in God, science discovered that the world is circle and not flat, but 2700 years ago it was already written in the bible that the earth is circle.
Isaiah 40: 21-22 It is He who sits above the circle Of the Earth
Also read the book of Job, he tell us that the earth isn't supported with anything but it is HUNG upon NOTHING. science discovered this just lately but the bible speaks the truth
jovenamago 1 year ago
@jovenamago actually the greeks were the first to propose that idea of a round earth not the bible
GulfnorTheGreat 1 year ago
@jovenamago Everyone has their own opinion. I'm not a religious person nor do I have anything against people that are, I actually believe that faith is needed because sadly, alot of people would be lost without it. However, I don't feel it's exactly honest for you to say what is a theory and what is not. If people choose to believe in the big bang theory allow them to, just as you would like to be allowed to stand by your choice. Also, a piece of information that might be useful:
Samprzz 1 year ago
@jovenamago Don't fight science with religion, or fight religion with science. You can not expect one who believes in facts to believe the bible as he prefers logical explanations over higher beings such as God, nor can you expect a religious person to put away his faith and only look at facts. Furthermore; there is no evidence that the uneducated masses believed in a flat earth, this was just a myth that originated in the 19th century and was believed worldwide. It still is, by most.
Samprzz 1 year ago
@Samprzz wait, are you saying there still are people believing that whole "earth is flat" theory? i respect most people's opinions if they're logical... but come on.. earth being flat? really? and also, i think it was developed way before 19th century.
xxslaayyahhxx 1 year ago
@xxslaayyahhxx No I meant that there were barely any people who believed the earth was flat to begin with. What I meant with 'It still is, by most', is that most people still believe that alot of people -used- to believe the earth was flat, which simply isn't true.. Most of them knew it wasn't flat, and that's that =P
Samprzz 1 year ago
@Samprzz What is you talking about? It is well documented that people worldwide believed in a flat world in the past until science proved that earth is round. It is even understandable because it seems like that by the naked eye alone.
firespinguy 1 year ago
@firespinguy By that reasoning you should believe everything that has been written down. Let me just link this (I actually hate linking it because it's from Wikipedia, I only do it because I know it to be true):
The misconception that educated people at the time of Columbus believed in a flat Earth has been referred to as The Myth of the Flat Earth.
The idea that educated men at the time of Columbus believed that the earth was flat remains one of the hardiest errors in teaching.
Samprzz 1 year ago
@Samprzz
I don't fight science with religion, what I'm trying to say is that science and religion don not contradict and it's possible that science and religion are the same true, like what I'm saying that the earth is billions of years like science said, and bible said the a day is a thousand years for God, so when He create the universe, galaxy, and the earth, it's not 7 earth days but days of God, If you will compare science and religion you would notice that they have the same views :P
jovenamago 1 year ago
Chuck Norris Unlocked The Perfect Combination....
superleftysourflap 1 year ago
Comment removed
zqewkl 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"check it out"
mingjitsu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Check it out"
punkidjulian 1 year ago
is that Stephen Hawking new voice as narrator on wiki it says he has upgraded his voice box
wkgm11 1 year ago
just...just... sorry i have no words to describe this
purekosovenblood 1 year ago
How is it more logical or likely that life formed somewhere else than on earth and then was carried here? I'm sceptical about theories that explain presence of things on earth by asteroids, like water or life in this case. It just seems too easy to me because even if it did not appear here first, you still have to answer the question how it appeared somewhere else. You can't just say '' Oh it came from space, problem solved''. It doesn't answer the real question, ''how was life formed''.
sleepwalker2112 1 year ago
@sleepwalker2112 That's where God comes into play
nichols1994 1 year ago
@nichols1994 It's one of the possible answers, but not the most likely. Over the time, humans have proven to be very effective at convincing themself that gods exists. It's just our nature, we need to believe...
sleepwalker2112 1 year ago
@sleepwalker2112 ok then give me a more likely explanation.
nichols1994 1 year ago
@nichols1994 Life is part of nature... It apears where it can.
sleepwalker2112 1 year ago
@sleepwalker2112 That doesn't explain how it got here...
nichols1994 1 year ago
@nichols1994 Maybe humans dont have the ultimate answers.... yet, but that doesn't mean to say a 'god' had anything to do with it. It just means we do not know yet. god's were only created by human imagination based on very very old ways of thinking and it seems religious people think 'if it can't be explained, it must be gods work'.... and even if it can be explained, its still gods work. God = imaginary friend for adults.
SirHABIT 1 year ago 6
@sleepwalker2112 i think its all luck ,i meen you have no idea how huge the universe is so many planets so so many. so. lets say it is luck .say 1 in a billion chance of life forming . lets say theres 30 billion planets just random planets so the odds of life starting one in a billlion so shouldent there be 30 planets with some form of life on them and even if it isnt one in a billion it could be one in a trillion but still there is so many planets that life could be anywhere
tisilwm 1 year ago
@tisilwm I agree 100%
sleepwalker2112 1 year ago
If the universes is compared to the varying different forms of life on earth; The true question should be what are the possibilities of other universes? Maybe looking @ the bigger picture we can possible answer the more pressing question of life in our universe.
Tamayo1980 1 year ago
man i find this stuff so interesting..im 14!
enigmasadrenaline6 1 year ago
@enigmasadrenaline6 same even though its abit nerdy for a 14 year old LOL
iiAiRFoRcE 1 year ago
@iiAiRFoRcE idc...i still like it but i keep it to myself
enigmasadrenaline6 1 year ago
@enigmasadrenaline6 Same here mate.
PROkiller16 1 year ago
@PROkiller16 XD glad to find soo many people find this in common...
enigmasadrenaline6 1 year ago
@enigmasadrenaline6 Comes with being a teen I guess.
PROkiller16 1 year ago
I bet Stephen Hawking just plays Episodes of Star Trek inside his head...
OURVIDZSUCKBALLZ 1 year ago
When he said that its hard to believe that life just came out of now where made me believe that religion is fake, what a pitty that all these people think it is real.
DaG2TheB 1 year ago
does any1 know the name of the song which begins on the intro??
mallussionist 1 year ago
BULLCRUD
StarfireEKS 1 year ago
Hawking is the man
HotFuzz456 1 year ago
I liked Into the Universe with SH the best, it goes on to describe much of the science through more solid groundings rather than speculation. This episode though seems a bit far fetched as far as the lifeforms go. I'd like to be absolutely certain about biological evolution on different variables rather than just say 'they COULD exist' . Of course these documentaries are just flexing their CGI muscles most of the time.
Nexstarcrazyness 1 year ago
Whats great about this series, is that in many science documentaries, are dumbed down, and only have an overview, while this show looks at detail and is very open minded. I watch many shows about astrobiology, and only Earth-like life is shown (I know that our best chance of finding life is by looking for Earth-like planets because the really alien life would be more difficult to recorgnise, but still this show is very detailed and looks at many possibilities).
WormulonDCP 1 year ago 2
I find it entertaining that modern humans had only been around for little more than 200,000 years and yet our most advanced technology had existed for a 100 or less depending on who you ask.
And the most intricate sciences had been in the development for the last 20 to 30 or so years. To an alien civilisation they must be going, WTF had you been doing the last 200,000 years?!
And we go, WAR! OIL! BURN BABY BURN!
Nexstarcrazyness 1 year ago 2
#1
@Nexstarcrazyness
We are fed a sanitized view of the history of technology (though that would be true of all the history that looms in the forefront of most people).
The truth is that most scientific discoveries--for example, human flight--have been almost immediately re-purposed for war. Airplanes were used to drop bombs, and for the first time in history, even women and children were deliberately bombed and burned alive.
--continues in # 2 --
MeshugenahScientist 1 year ago
#2
@Nexstarcrazyness
Science and it's applications (what we call "technology") was in fact carried out in the distant past, and (I would imagine) far more than we have evidence for today--BUT it was kept secret, and for good reason. One of the reasons, as mentioned in #1, was that it would quickly be abused for inter-personal murder, injury and torture, on whatever scale. The first cases of chemical warfare in WWI come to mind.
--continues in #3 --
MeshugenahScientist 1 year ago
#3
@Nexstarcrazyness
Twenty-two centuries ago, a King in the Orient, after winning a war using techniques made possible by natural laws deciphered, felt compelled toward a massive effort to forbid scientific knowledge to be purposed for war. He established a secret society of nine "scientists" who were to remain hidden, and who would be replaced by appropriately groomed men with the passage of time. He also established hospitals for animals, and spread vegetarianism.
Google: nine unknown men
MeshugenahScientist 1 year ago
@MeshugenahScientist #1
I find it amusing that civilizations will take such a long time to notice that the grains in which provide them food, and the wood which provide them fire and shelter, are depleted and force them to make an effort to establish peaceful harvesting and replenishing before they realize that the wars were foaght only because there were 'plenty' and that peace will be achieved only because there is 'no more'. But through the famine come the feeding of the mind.
Nexstarcrazyness 1 year ago
@Nexstarcrazyness
#2
and mindkind will lift themselves into a high plane of existence where the soil need not be from the ground, and the ether allow for expansion of their existence through the manipulation and understanding of the atom and our one sun of many stars become many suns of all stars.
And mankind will realize that they are one of many peoples of these stars divided only by spacetime.
Nexstarcrazyness 1 year ago
@Nexstarcrazyness
Interesting, though I may be sensing your words in ways you didn't intend.
"Soil need not be from the ground" and "manipulation and understanding of the atom" especially caught my attention.
Do you have anything I can google?
MeshugenahScientist 1 year ago
this is the scariest shit ive ever seen..
cornerbox 1 year ago
Brilliant man, a universe in a chair.
PantheraAtrox 1 year ago
THANK YOU!!!!!!! as prince said if they taught school like this i would want at live at school
whywuduc4r3 1 year ago
Dam i wish they tought school like this
Princelee30 1 year ago 19
@Princelee30
They do.
casualslander 1 year ago
i think im going to spontaneously combust!!! (fart) ooooh..(aftermath)-aaahhhhh
gabrielredux 1 year ago
The known universe actually contains a trillion or so galaxies.
RJL738 1 year ago
i find it very hard to believe that we are not alone
BruceSiemering15 1 year ago
@BruceSiemering15 I don't. With more stars than sand grains on Earth, how can you find it hard to believe?
yehcnimoigres 1 year ago
There are other things that exist around us that are just as likely as the creation of life. When someone wins the big prize in the lotto the odds are also huge but enough people play to produce a winner. What I'm saying is that just because people find it hard to imagine that life can be created spontaneously doesn't mean that it didn't.
DUNKDAEXCESS 1 year ago
Friggin amazing... mindblowing if i can say about ours one in that manner. Thanks for upload.
VooDooMadMan 1 year ago
Amazing how big the universe really is, 1:21 - 2:37 blow my mind! I knew the universe was big but we are like a atom in the middle of hundreds of football fields.. When it comes to how small we are to 2:37 lol
yfg483792gew 1 year ago
they have allready made time machines all over if you read the focus mag,they testing at the north pole i have pictures here now focus from 2006,and they have one in japan a neutrino detector,good stuff
sgtpete1 1 year ago
such a brilliant man..and the fact he puts God in the mix changed my whole outlook on "the big bang" I always considered it to be something that disproved Gods creation. im no holy roller, but i believe in God and i find it AMAZING that a man of this brilliance credits God for this work. such a wonderful man
wowbishyjust 1 year ago
@wowbishyjust He didn't credit god for this work, he simply recognized the notion. But yeah Hawkings is a good guy.
sammywilloe 1 year ago
i love science!!
818doodooroo 1 year ago
omg thank you!! now ill start watching :)
transformersHD2009 1 year ago
Please somebody, explain how quantum mechanics work because my brain is about to explode.
doublegdog 1 year ago
@doublegdog
it's a bit complex...ya got a cup of coffee and some time?
glennr2222 1 year ago
@doublegdog Your IQ needs to be above 130 to fully understand that.
bamboostinger 1 year ago
@bamboostinger Well I'm 15 years old and I have an IQ of 126. Is that close enough?
doublegdog 1 year ago
@doublegdog if you were that smart, you would never watch this kind of thing. You would figure that out by yourself before that age . Agree, stupid ?
bamboostinger 1 year ago
@bamboostinger Well, this type of thing just recently sparked my interest. Just because somebody has a high IQ, does not mean that they know everything.
doublegdog 1 year ago
Certainly a possibilty
tinysk8r2 1 year ago
Wow I think Stephen Hawking is a brilliant guy but to hear him try so hard to deny the existence of a creator just makes me cringe. He is a mathematician, but claims that random amino acids could have bumped against each other enough times to produce DNA, RNA or even a single cell organism that was able to reproduce? The level of complexity and instruction found within a single strand of DNA is the equivalent of a tornado sweeping through and a junk yard and accidentally building a Rolls Royce.
moali68 1 year ago
@moali68 I think you missed what he was saying. With inifinte possibilities comes infinite outcomes. Take sodium and chloride, chloride is deadly by its self but with the right amount of sodium you get salt. What are the odds of the right amount of chloride and sodium mixing together and creating salt?
TMJ112389 1 year ago
@moali68 Might I ask, but where do you get your statistics from? It has been shown in laboratory settings that by recreating what early earth was like in terms of chemistry; air concentration, composition, and temperature, we observe that amino acids such as DNA and RNA actually form spontaneously on their own. And, it has been repeated in experiment time and time again. Does this seem like an unlikely occurrence to you?
GammaRay6626 1 year ago
@GammaRay6626 please provide a link. The complexity of one strand of DNA is not within the realm of random occurrence even after a million years of random collisions. Stephen Hawking is a numbers guy he knows this. Also I mentioned that not only does the DNA have to create itself it must do so in a manner that allows it to pass information to a copy of itself so that it can reproduce and continue to reproduce.
moali68 1 year ago
@moali68 Seriously, take a look at a modern physics textbook. Once. Heisenberg's Uncertainly Principle clearly gives way for the modern laws of physics and chemistry, coupled with statistics, to form as many a complex molecule as can exist. DNA is NOT the only self replicating molecule. The amount of documentation of the "spontaneous" and "improbable" formation of organic compounds is copious with a bit of effort, which you seem to deny. Nearly anything is within the realm of random occurrence.
GammaRay6626 1 year ago
@moali68 Life did not have to begin with DNA, and in fact it most likely didn't. Any molecule capable of self-replication would suffice. Yes, that event would probably be extremely unlikely. But there are more stars than sand grains on all the beaches of the planet. Given a sheer number like that, the improbable may become inevitable. And, of course, once the first self-replicating molecules arose, the non-random process of natural selection could take over.
yehcnimoigres 1 year ago
@moali68 Also, not only was there an abundance of planets for the origin of life to occur, but an abundance of time. You say, "even after a million years", but there were hundreds of millions of years just on the earth for the first life to arise. And that's just on one planet.
yehcnimoigres 1 year ago
@GammaRay6626 DNA and RNA are not made of amino acids, but nucleic acids and phosphorylated sugars. You're correct about amino acids being easily made, and they are the building blocks of our bodies. The DNA is the blueprint of those amino acids, which then link together to form proteins.
yehcnimoigres 1 year ago
AWSOME!
Zeppo3 1 year ago 34
@Zeppo3 Very!
Forojr 1 year ago 25
@Forojr I added these to a rather long playlist filled wtih great scientific shows...Hope you don't mind...
Jarethenator 1 year ago