Your "chain of thoughts" is based on one single presumption : light consists of foton's (without mass) , and neutrino's (with mass) . That presumption is wrong .
If the speed of light slows as electron rest mass increases since the Big Bang this will explain red shift. The half life of Th-232 matches the age of the galaxy, and the half life of U-238 matches the age of the Sun to allow proton-proton nuclear fusion by stars. By approaching nuclear reactor critical mass sound waves but not light by magic or miracle can teleport to break the speed of light. A magic trick could make appear a battery operated device but not light directly.
This is very interesting but you did mention a few times that Neutrinos don't affect matter, however recent studies have shown that Neutrinos from the sun do cause alterations in nuclear decay rate on earth.
@FuckinSIayer There are different methods, but usually with heavy water. They do interact but very weakly. One of the analogy I have heard is that if you pass a neutrino through a block of lead a light year long, it will it will hit one atom. So for all intents and purposes, you can say that neutrinos don't interact with matter.
All the stupid comments make me laugh. People complaining that you're bad at gears, then the ones that tell you you dont know what you're talking about. People have pretty big balls over the Internet haha.
It hasn't been verified yet. That's the great thing about science is that you have to submit your findings for peer review, replication and verification.
They claim to have made it go faster. They are just throwing out that it might have happened. Want to know what the professors at my Universtiy did when they heard the news? Nothing. The scientists at Cern are still very busy verifying that what they "found" is actually true
@goillini0 Well it's not so much verifying as trying to find something--- anything wrong with it as to not screw up everything we know. They did account for error I believe, but it's still not 100 percent set in stone
@mattryanownz Yep. I agree. It would be really mind blowing if they did make it go faster but I think the possibility that it actually happened is very small
i guess photons having maybe no mass and neutrinos having mass shows something. but neutrinos don't interact with matter??? if they didn't, we wouldn't know their mass for one thing. wouldn't be able to detect their speed for another.
@H1TMANactual i didn't read any of the comments. i just watched the video, which i didn't even have to, but you recommended it so i was bored and figured why not. honestly i hated particle physics. worst class ever. as much memorization as biology. so maybe you're right. maybe the current guess at a neutrino's weight is correct. and then if the experiment is correct then relativity needs to be changed. i don't know but i doubt you do either.
Although you are wrong about neutrinos not interesting with mass. They interact with mass through weak nuclear interaction, and gravitation. Where as normal matter, and photons interact through electric fields as well. If they didn't interact with mass we could not detect them, and they would be another hypothetical particle like the graviton.
Thank you. Finally someone who realizes that GPS, the mechanism used for timing, is based on general relativity, which is based on special relativity. How can you prove Einstein wrong using a technology based in his calculations?
@kev92715 Yes neutrinos do interact with matter, but explaining that would have required me to go into details about the forces. Weak nuclear force is the 2nd weakest and gravity (or quantum gravity) is trillions of magnitudes weaker. Moreover due to it's speed gravity doesn't affect it (besides something as heavy as a black hole). For all intents and purposes, neutrinos don't interact with matter.
I think the more apropos hypothetical particle would have been a tachyon :)
@H1TMANactual Though weak nuclear is the 2nd weakest it still can have very noticeable effects. Most notably the fact that electric forces dont pull all electrons into the nucleus and cause all atoms to become neutrons.
Isnt a tachyon just a particle that travels faster than c? Until now it was though to have negative mass (or imaginary, i cant remember), but in light of this experiment the neutrino could be called a tachyon itself. As well as the graviton (if it exists) could now be tachyon.
@kev92715 Right, but you're ignoring the momentum, which is what keeps the electrons from falling in.
Yes tachyon is a hypothetical particle that travels faster than light. But tachyons have no mass, so neutrinos can't be tachyons. Even gravitons if they exist, as force carriers won't have mass. The existence of neither tachyons or gravitons violate special relativity, but neutrinos with mass travelling faster than c does.
@H1TMANactual I never said weak nuclear was the only thing keeping them orbiting.
A graviton traveling faster than c would violate SR. In SR the fastest a 0 rest mass particle can go is c. If graviton went faster it would violate casualty. Also forces can have mass but then limited range (gluon, W boson, virtual photon) A tachyon in SR i aloud to pass c, because it has imaginary mass, not zero. The neutrino passing c is a tachyon with a real positive mass, which is breaking SR.
@kev92715 No, when you work it out on paper it has imaginary mass, but mass/energy or velocity cannot be non-real or negative. That is why it is a hypothetical particle.
Gravitons travelling ftl do violate SR. It should be travelling at c.
But like I said in the video, science is simply observation, and if we have neutrinos travelling ftl, then observation contradicts theory, so we will have to re-work it.
I don't know where this discussion is going but it was fun. Thanks :)
Nice commentary. Although I know all this stuff already, you clearly know what you're talking about which is hard to say for most people who comment on this revelation.
I don't know what to make of this yet as other experiments clearly contradict these results as the neutrinos observed from SN1987A traveled just as fast as the photons which seems to agree with special relativity.
I'll just wait to see what the scientists say next.
Liked and subbed, very well explained I hope there are means to travel faster then the speed of light because it gives hope of survival for the human race
Nice explanation. Got tot love the news articles which came out about the info. Whether reading or watching I'm glad to know people are a really stoked about all this new scientific data and theories which might be challenging Einstein
I'm glad I got invited or rather a message on YouTube from you, No homo lol. Def like that you put 2 great things together Gaming and Science even though if you think about it, Gaming is a Science n vise versa lol. Just Subscribed and can't wait to hear more.
@TheMusiicMan You can't travel back in time but if you were to be capable of traveling at or 99.9% the speed of light you could actually travel into the future. It's a bit hard to explain but have you ever been on a highway and went past a slower car than you? Doesn't it seem as if the car is just sitting their as you speed right pass them but you know if you were to slow down that car would eventually catch up. Time never changes it just tends to get slower the faster you go. I hope that helped
@itsbitches i understand going forward in time that makes sense when explained as a theory it's just the people saying going back in time i completely get lost to how the hell that could even been thought possible by somebody
@TheMusiicMan well its not thought of as possible... this is one reason that neutrinos(if not in just appearing to move over c.) may cuase some rethinking...someone correct me if i'm wrong, but a ship going faster than c might arrive before its left... or if you are at a machine sent a faster than c signal to a machine (say a teleporter)to send you somewhere, the machine would get beamed up yesterday and you wouldn't be there to send the signal... causality theories are not fixed though...
@jorgepeterbarton i suppose one way around that is to have, like 3 dimensions of space, one or more time dimension and some probability dimensions (saying that every possible event happens in parallel universes) in set thats linked. then by moving back in time you don't change the future-it stays the same in that particular parallel universe, but you take a new route into a new universe because a different choice was made. thus preserving causality.
nice video i heard wings of redemption talk about this topic but he did not explain what the findings were you explained it really well what had been discovered
i really love this video only i don't know if you want to be big but this isn't the way because 90 % of youtube are 12 year old trolls who won't like this sort of video
Even if they're right, Einstein never knew about neutrinos, but he made a big discovery. So they need to credit him for making a discovery without the use of modern technology. And just because neutrinos can travel faster than the speed of light, doesn't mean we humans can.
It did not contraverse physics laws, because they still work :3 The only thing they needed to do is at Neutrino's can travel faster then light ... 50 nanoseconds faster :S so a thing that fits 5 times into an atom could maybe travel that fast
dude, i'm a fan! you are a very intelligent and smart person. i can just tell by listening to you. i subscribe and i will be impatiently waiting for your next commentary or analysis. great video!
i think problems of humanity and this age of time can only be solved by spreading literacy, and you are doing just that! great work!
@Gobln15 1. You have to take a lot of physics in engineering. General/special relativity and quantum mechanics is covered in University physics I.
2. I have played gears since gears 1. When I am playing any game, including gears, I am usually on my lazboy recliner with a beer. I don't play to impress you or anyone else for that matter. What I am saying is I don't give a shit if you think I am bad at gears and this is not a gameplay channel.
@H1TMANactual Ok so i know this wasn't directed at me but... your comment was too retarded not to reply to, firstly your number 1 doesn't actually make any sense... you have to take physics... for what? But disregarding that, if you don't want people hating you about being shit at gears then don't post videos with you playing it. If it isn't a gameplay channel don't post gameplay you fucking dipshit. But finally, you seriously don't have a clue what you're talking about, stick to being retarded.
@jackhwo1 unless he changed the comment it clearly says you have to take a lot of physics in engineering, which is true...next, why be such an ass about the gameplay does it really matter whats in the background, do you think people would watch it if it was just a black screen...? and clearly just the fact that he knows these concepts means he has at least a general understanding of it all, ive taken some fairly advanced physics and from what i payed attention to he made sense
@H1TMANactual If you travelled the speed of light away from the earth and back, more time would've passed on earth than you have aged because time is faster relative to you, time on earth seems like its slower because you travel so fast.
Even if earth time was slower like you said (WHICH IS NOT TRUE), you wouldn't got back in time, you would just age faster than the rest of the earth, because everything else is slower, but you're still ageing at normal pace.
@H1TMANactual Travelling backwards in time is impossible, no matter who says it is, it doesn't make it so. The only thing about that time that can change, is the rate in which you or an object travels through it, time cannot be reversed.
@cCartzy If I'm a child, are you ready to be outsmarted? A lightyear is how fast light goes in a year. If you go faster, the place you end will not be receive the light yet. So you will not see the current earth. It will show the past. This is proven through stars. Stars supernova right now but the explosions are not visible to us yet. This is because they are lightyears away.
@cCartzy That was also what I thought because we are ALWAYS traveling forwards. But look at the sonic boom effect, then you will realize that you travel backwards if you go faster than light.
I'm just gonna say this, i think that if something were to travel faster than light, it would be invisible. You could probably only see it when the light that was behind the neutrinos went by. Just like sound the speed of sound. So, you could not see the neutrinos.
And this is why I'm subscribed to this channel. Thanks for that insightful commentary mate :). I don't know what to hope for, whether these findings get confirmed by other researchers or not, but at least it's an exiting time to be alive!
I heard wings talking about this and I was thinking the same thing this is the time to be alive with all the things were discovering it's amazing what well be able to accomplish im only 13 and I can't wait to
@beelo1220 - I think the same :). I'm older, 27; it would have been awesome to be so young and still taught "what really exists" when this stuff comes out!! I might have been less bitter about the "truth", that is really just observations, that I was told to believe all those years.
nice! but my theory is light is bent by the earths gravitational pull and therefore they travel in an arch which give the nuetrinos just enough time to be faster.. so thats my theory
@nintendude60 - Interesting! Email the people who did the experiment and see what they think :D. At you've given one of the best youtube comments on a subject ever :). Very relevant and possibly true!
@quicktooth1 i really really hope they thought about this cuz i would hate to bring this finding down by such a simple explanation haha. oh well. thanks for the compliment :D
Your "chain of thoughts" is based on one single presumption : light consists of foton's (without mass) , and neutrino's (with mass) . That presumption is wrong .
wolters1953 2 months ago
@wolters1953 It's spelled photons buddy, and no it's not a presumption.
H1TMANactual 2 months ago 3
If the speed of light slows as electron rest mass increases since the Big Bang this will explain red shift. The half life of Th-232 matches the age of the galaxy, and the half life of U-238 matches the age of the Sun to allow proton-proton nuclear fusion by stars. By approaching nuclear reactor critical mass sound waves but not light by magic or miracle can teleport to break the speed of light. A magic trick could make appear a battery operated device but not light directly.
Volcilord 3 months ago
This is very interesting but you did mention a few times that Neutrinos don't affect matter, however recent studies have shown that Neutrinos from the sun do cause alterations in nuclear decay rate on earth.
DisentDesign 3 months ago
what is stopping us from creating away in the future to continuaslly accelerate a spacecraft faster and faster
superkevincao 4 months ago
@superkevincao Physics, physics stop us, it's not physically possible.
CorvetteBG 3 days ago
@CorvetteBG whats stopping us from defying physics eventually
superkevincao 3 days ago
@superkevincao Good point, in the past, people though it was physically impossible to split an atom, but eventually we did it.
CorvetteBG 3 days ago
if neutrinos dont interact with matter then how were they detected?
FuckinSIayer 4 months ago
@FuckinSIayer There are different methods, but usually with heavy water. They do interact but very weakly. One of the analogy I have heard is that if you pass a neutrino through a block of lead a light year long, it will it will hit one atom. So for all intents and purposes, you can say that neutrinos don't interact with matter.
H1TMANactual 4 months ago
All the stupid comments make me laugh. People complaining that you're bad at gears, then the ones that tell you you dont know what you're talking about. People have pretty big balls over the Internet haha.
ryanstr1996 4 months ago 5
the sawed off ruined this video for me..
Antdizle2121 4 months ago
It hasn't been verified yet. That's the great thing about science is that you have to submit your findings for peer review, replication and verification.
TheProdigalMindset 4 months ago
omg!! this could change the world!! o.O
yeah im ready for a change... ;)
ImLegend932 4 months ago
speed is the purest thing in the world.
DerrickRoseFTW 4 months ago in playlist Liked
.............2
E = MC
VAWAhorrors 5 months ago
.................2 E = MC
VAWAhorrors 5 months ago
Awesome explanation, and nice gaming!
pravkdey 5 months ago
They claim to have made it go faster. They are just throwing out that it might have happened. Want to know what the professors at my Universtiy did when they heard the news? Nothing. The scientists at Cern are still very busy verifying that what they "found" is actually true
goillini0 5 months ago
@goillini0 Well it's not so much verifying as trying to find something--- anything wrong with it as to not screw up everything we know. They did account for error I believe, but it's still not 100 percent set in stone
mattryanownz 4 months ago
@mattryanownz Yep. I agree. It would be really mind blowing if they did make it go faster but I think the possibility that it actually happened is very small
goillini0 4 months ago
EPIC love it
lockNload99 5 months ago
everything i know is a lie!!!!!
1MJfollower 5 months ago
"Stand of the edge of know and stare into the edge of unkown" that word just made my day :D
xLurycz 5 months ago
Time stops if something travels faster than the speed of light?
xLurycz 5 months ago
Good shit, man
BlackxHawk69 5 months ago
i guess photons having maybe no mass and neutrinos having mass shows something. but neutrinos don't interact with matter??? if they didn't, we wouldn't know their mass for one thing. wouldn't be able to detect their speed for another.
odunne2 5 months ago
@odunne2 Dude really great job reading off someone else's comment.
H1TMANactual 5 months ago
@H1TMANactual i didn't read any of the comments. i just watched the video, which i didn't even have to, but you recommended it so i was bored and figured why not. honestly i hated particle physics. worst class ever. as much memorization as biology. so maybe you're right. maybe the current guess at a neutrino's weight is correct. and then if the experiment is correct then relativity needs to be changed. i don't know but i doubt you do either.
odunne2 5 months ago
@odunne2 Lmao you're so full of shit truther. Particle physics is a 400 level class for physics majors.
H1TMANactual 5 months ago
Although you are wrong about neutrinos not interesting with mass. They interact with mass through weak nuclear interaction, and gravitation. Where as normal matter, and photons interact through electric fields as well. If they didn't interact with mass we could not detect them, and they would be another hypothetical particle like the graviton.
kev92715 5 months ago
Thank you. Finally someone who realizes that GPS, the mechanism used for timing, is based on general relativity, which is based on special relativity. How can you prove Einstein wrong using a technology based in his calculations?
kev92715 5 months ago
@kev92715 Yes neutrinos do interact with matter, but explaining that would have required me to go into details about the forces. Weak nuclear force is the 2nd weakest and gravity (or quantum gravity) is trillions of magnitudes weaker. Moreover due to it's speed gravity doesn't affect it (besides something as heavy as a black hole). For all intents and purposes, neutrinos don't interact with matter.
I think the more apropos hypothetical particle would have been a tachyon :)
H1TMANactual 5 months ago
@H1TMANactual Though weak nuclear is the 2nd weakest it still can have very noticeable effects. Most notably the fact that electric forces dont pull all electrons into the nucleus and cause all atoms to become neutrons.
Isnt a tachyon just a particle that travels faster than c? Until now it was though to have negative mass (or imaginary, i cant remember), but in light of this experiment the neutrino could be called a tachyon itself. As well as the graviton (if it exists) could now be tachyon.
kev92715 5 months ago
@kev92715 Right, but you're ignoring the momentum, which is what keeps the electrons from falling in.
Yes tachyon is a hypothetical particle that travels faster than light. But tachyons have no mass, so neutrinos can't be tachyons. Even gravitons if they exist, as force carriers won't have mass. The existence of neither tachyons or gravitons violate special relativity, but neutrinos with mass travelling faster than c does.
H1TMANactual 5 months ago
@H1TMANactual I never said weak nuclear was the only thing keeping them orbiting.
A graviton traveling faster than c would violate SR. In SR the fastest a 0 rest mass particle can go is c. If graviton went faster it would violate casualty. Also forces can have mass but then limited range (gluon, W boson, virtual photon) A tachyon in SR i aloud to pass c, because it has imaginary mass, not zero. The neutrino passing c is a tachyon with a real positive mass, which is breaking SR.
kev92715 5 months ago
@kev92715 No, when you work it out on paper it has imaginary mass, but mass/energy or velocity cannot be non-real or negative. That is why it is a hypothetical particle.
Gravitons travelling ftl do violate SR. It should be travelling at c.
But like I said in the video, science is simply observation, and if we have neutrinos travelling ftl, then observation contradicts theory, so we will have to re-work it.
I don't know where this discussion is going but it was fun. Thanks :)
H1TMANactual 5 months ago
Nice commentary. Although I know all this stuff already, you clearly know what you're talking about which is hard to say for most people who comment on this revelation.
I don't know what to make of this yet as other experiments clearly contradict these results as the neutrinos observed from SN1987A traveled just as fast as the photons which seems to agree with special relativity.
I'll just wait to see what the scientists say next.
KieranVFX 5 months ago
yo thnx 4 sending the vid liked, faved and subbed :)
Urken1231 5 months ago
Liked and subbed, very well explained I hope there are means to travel faster then the speed of light because it gives hope of survival for the human race
slipknnnot 5 months ago
what game is that?
rugsyofspurs 5 months ago
subscribed......Interesting topic.
zoidberg96913 5 months ago
what nationality are you bro?
PlsPlayDota 5 months ago
btw great vedio and 9/11 was an inside job
qortin 5 months ago
Nice video.
@qortin You're an idiot
GZxModzz 5 months ago
@GZxModzz fuck you too
qortin 5 months ago
I am no scientist however, maybe einstein's theory only applies to the physical universe if you get what I mean.
Neutrino are not exactly made out of mass since they pass through it...
qortin 5 months ago
For a change someone sent me a video that was worth watching. Bravo.
MrVanleider 5 months ago
2:03 equals rape
blondyboy88 5 months ago
Nice explanation. Got tot love the news articles which came out about the info. Whether reading or watching I'm glad to know people are a really stoked about all this new scientific data and theories which might be challenging Einstein
Nickelstarfilms 5 months ago
Thanks brocheski.
JohnnyBravoCentral 5 months ago
U so smart :D haha thanks for explaining subbed
TheSuperMeximan 5 months ago
I'm glad I got invited or rather a message on YouTube from you, No homo lol. Def like that you put 2 great things together Gaming and Science even though if you think about it, Gaming is a Science n vise versa lol. Just Subscribed and can't wait to hear more.
itsbitches 5 months ago
i really don't get it how can you go back in time by going faster than light?
TheMusiicMan 5 months ago
@TheMusiicMan You can't travel back in time but if you were to be capable of traveling at or 99.9% the speed of light you could actually travel into the future. It's a bit hard to explain but have you ever been on a highway and went past a slower car than you? Doesn't it seem as if the car is just sitting their as you speed right pass them but you know if you were to slow down that car would eventually catch up. Time never changes it just tends to get slower the faster you go. I hope that helped
itsbitches 5 months ago
@itsbitches i understand going forward in time that makes sense when explained as a theory it's just the people saying going back in time i completely get lost to how the hell that could even been thought possible by somebody
TheMusiicMan 5 months ago
@TheMusiicMan well its not thought of as possible... this is one reason that neutrinos(if not in just appearing to move over c.) may cuase some rethinking...someone correct me if i'm wrong, but a ship going faster than c might arrive before its left... or if you are at a machine sent a faster than c signal to a machine (say a teleporter)to send you somewhere, the machine would get beamed up yesterday and you wouldn't be there to send the signal... causality theories are not fixed though...
jorgepeterbarton 5 months ago
@jorgepeterbarton i suppose one way around that is to have, like 3 dimensions of space, one or more time dimension and some probability dimensions (saying that every possible event happens in parallel universes) in set thats linked. then by moving back in time you don't change the future-it stays the same in that particular parallel universe, but you take a new route into a new universe because a different choice was made. thus preserving causality.
jorgepeterbarton 5 months ago
nice video i heard wings of redemption talk about this topic but he did not explain what the findings were you explained it really well what had been discovered
drunknutterLUFC 5 months ago
i really love this video only i don't know if you want to be big but this isn't the way because 90 % of youtube are 12 year old trolls who won't like this sort of video
MrSHADEKILLA 5 months ago
Even if they're right, Einstein never knew about neutrinos, but he made a big discovery. So they need to credit him for making a discovery without the use of modern technology. And just because neutrinos can travel faster than the speed of light, doesn't mean we humans can.
gucciman257 5 months ago
It did not contraverse physics laws, because they still work :3 The only thing they needed to do is at Neutrino's can travel faster then light ... 50 nanoseconds faster :S so a thing that fits 5 times into an atom could maybe travel that fast
koelkast9 5 months ago
that's heavy, Doc
lasarack 5 months ago
dude, i'm a fan! you are a very intelligent and smart person. i can just tell by listening to you. i subscribe and i will be impatiently waiting for your next commentary or analysis. great video!
i think problems of humanity and this age of time can only be solved by spreading literacy, and you are doing just that! great work!
tamoorgheba 5 months ago
Nice vid
davesofresh84 5 months ago
yeah the commentary was very intellectual but i have a hard time even pondering that you know what you are saying
btw your not good at gears
your movement is ok for a dbs user but its easier to make certain manuever with the dbs and retro
Gobln15 5 months ago
@Gobln15 1. You have to take a lot of physics in engineering. General/special relativity and quantum mechanics is covered in University physics I.
2. I have played gears since gears 1. When I am playing any game, including gears, I am usually on my lazboy recliner with a beer. I don't play to impress you or anyone else for that matter. What I am saying is I don't give a shit if you think I am bad at gears and this is not a gameplay channel.
H1TMANactual 5 months ago 7
Comment removed
jackhwo1 5 months ago
@H1TMANactual Ok so i know this wasn't directed at me but... your comment was too retarded not to reply to, firstly your number 1 doesn't actually make any sense... you have to take physics... for what? But disregarding that, if you don't want people hating you about being shit at gears then don't post videos with you playing it. If it isn't a gameplay channel don't post gameplay you fucking dipshit. But finally, you seriously don't have a clue what you're talking about, stick to being retarded.
jackhwo1 5 months ago
@jackhwo1 Lmao u mad bro? Are you new to the channel? I am sure he gives a shit lol
JohnnyBravoCentral 5 months ago
@jackhwo1 unless he changed the comment it clearly says you have to take a lot of physics in engineering, which is true...next, why be such an ass about the gameplay does it really matter whats in the background, do you think people would watch it if it was just a black screen...? and clearly just the fact that he knows these concepts means he has at least a general understanding of it all, ive taken some fairly advanced physics and from what i payed attention to he made sense
BDAShadow1 5 months ago
SUBEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
ShInInGReNaGaDe 5 months ago
i was about to click off bcs u talk kind of wierd but i glad i didnt :)
Ninjagus1 5 months ago
Put the sawed off away and put a battery in your smoke detector lol. The lol part was not for the sawed off, seriously stop using it
nAsTeGaming 5 months ago
wtf thats a good commentary but shit it was boring
TheStraitTito 5 months ago
I will only sub you if you never use the sawed off shotgun again
lennartvdhave 5 months ago
great commentary. very well spoken and it got me interested right away
AndrewHartness 5 months ago
Love how this is a gears vid commentary.
lardtaziumwadmaster 5 months ago
Comment removed
Mrblack0ut81 5 months ago
We are a curious species. Pros and Cons come along with that fact. A whole other video for topic of conversation ;)
Mrblack0ut81 5 months ago
whaoooo<3
XceptionalHD 5 months ago
Lol, if something travels faster than light it goes FORWARD in time not backwards. That's impossible.
cCartzy 5 months ago
@cCartzy Sorry but that's incorrect.
H1TMANactual 5 months ago 8
@H1TMANactual If you travelled the speed of light away from the earth and back, more time would've passed on earth than you have aged because time is faster relative to you, time on earth seems like its slower because you travel so fast.
Even if earth time was slower like you said (WHICH IS NOT TRUE), you wouldn't got back in time, you would just age faster than the rest of the earth, because everything else is slower, but you're still ageing at normal pace.
cCartzy 5 months ago
@H1TMANactual Travelling backwards in time is impossible, no matter who says it is, it doesn't make it so. The only thing about that time that can change, is the rate in which you or an object travels through it, time cannot be reversed.
jackhwo1 5 months ago
@cCartzy Faster than light, means time travels backwards idiot
cougarooniejnr 5 months ago
@cougarooniejnr ...says you who cant even come up with a proper explanation...
cCartzy 5 months ago
@cCartzy If you go faster tha light and turn around it will be the past.
iLaffinGuerilla 5 months ago
@iLaffinGuerilla Yea, because that makes perfect sense doesn't it...
cCartzy 5 months ago
@cCartzy WOW, I'm starting to think you don't know what lightyear means.
iLaffinGuerilla 5 months ago
@iLaffinGuerilla I'm starting to think you're a child who think they know what they're talking about, but don't.
cCartzy 5 months ago
@cCartzy If I'm a child, are you ready to be outsmarted? A lightyear is how fast light goes in a year. If you go faster, the place you end will not be receive the light yet. So you will not see the current earth. It will show the past. This is proven through stars. Stars supernova right now but the explosions are not visible to us yet. This is because they are lightyears away.
iLaffinGuerilla 5 months ago
@iLaffinGuerilla no..
cCartzy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iLaffinGuerilla no..
cCartzy 5 months ago
@iLaffinGuerilla no...
cCartzy 5 months ago
@cCartzy Not sure if stupid or troll...
iLaffinGuerilla 5 months ago
@cCartzy ya it does make pufect sense dumbshit
TheStraitTito 5 months ago
@cCartzy That was also what I thought because we are ALWAYS traveling forwards. But look at the sonic boom effect, then you will realize that you travel backwards if you go faster than light.
A1rPun 5 months ago
Are you going to do more of those 'intelectual'' commentaries?
I love them!
99ShadowKing 5 months ago
@99ShadowKing Intellectual commentaries is all I do. You're at the right channel.
H1TMANactual 5 months ago 5
@H1TMANactual <3
99ShadowKing 5 months ago
Light got OWNED by a Neutrino
iborrada 5 months ago
why are you so sad?
CrazYMadarfakaR 5 months ago
If this is true thats crzy but I don think so
Cnasty006 5 months ago
I'm just gonna say this, i think that if something were to travel faster than light, it would be invisible. You could probably only see it when the light that was behind the neutrinos went by. Just like sound the speed of sound. So, you could not see the neutrinos.
abecadariun 5 months ago
damn that's amazing!!! Thanks for the news man.
nutripals 5 months ago
And this is why I'm subscribed to this channel. Thanks for that insightful commentary mate :). I don't know what to hope for, whether these findings get confirmed by other researchers or not, but at least it's an exiting time to be alive!
quicktooth1 5 months ago 2
I heard wings talking about this and I was thinking the same thing this is the time to be alive with all the things were discovering it's amazing what well be able to accomplish im only 13 and I can't wait to
See how
Life will be when I'm old
beelo1220 5 months ago
@beelo1220 - I think the same :). I'm older, 27; it would have been awesome to be so young and still taught "what really exists" when this stuff comes out!! I might have been less bitter about the "truth", that is really just observations, that I was told to believe all those years.
quicktooth1 5 months ago
nice! but my theory is light is bent by the earths gravitational pull and therefore they travel in an arch which give the nuetrinos just enough time to be faster.. so thats my theory
nintendude60 5 months ago
@nintendude60 - Interesting! Email the people who did the experiment and see what they think :D. At you've given one of the best youtube comments on a subject ever :). Very relevant and possibly true!
quicktooth1 5 months ago
@quicktooth1 i really really hope they thought about this cuz i would hate to bring this finding down by such a simple explanation haha. oh well. thanks for the compliment :D
nintendude60 5 months ago
Awesome commentary man!
CoDxbox360Videos 5 months ago
One of those youtubers are wingsofredemption I'm guessing
Leonurdinho959 5 months ago
sweet little commentary - you deserve more views
MARMALADEMARMOSET 5 months ago
ur commentary makes my balls tingle
soxVShelmut 5 months ago
it cant explained, cos it isnt humans place to understand.
blaze2010x 5 months ago
do you have a tweeter account ?
xkroNNNoS 5 months ago
How great... Now we have to rethink and relearn everything we thought we knew about physics.
shadowfootball1 5 months ago 4
damn thats crazy im gonna tell that to my science teacher tomorrow
bensumerau 5 months ago 10
wow!
jimboman241 5 months ago
damn :D
PokeFreakGuy 5 months ago
i love you commentaries man
DemonKing1415 5 months ago
Thanks.
Pizzaeater12344 5 months ago