The costumes in this film are really beautiful and look sort of contempary,especially the black gown.Sofia coppola and the crew did a brilliant job and if people are going to criticize this film,they should look up somthing called artistic licence
Annie kept referring to Kirsten Dunst as Kristen!! Geez,as amazing as you are, you should make an effort to remember the name of the people you're working with! No excuse!!
I loved the costumes in this movie and how they proved to the world JUST HOW AMAZING the 18th century was. HOWEVER, the speech and the music was just too modern for me. It was creatively lazy. They COULD have used something close enough to the way they used to speak to at least give a SENSE of history, and used slightly more classy music. But they didnt.....but i still do love the costumes. You cant get those at a halloween store!
@snakedemon11 Is that a joke? Lazy? How is her creativity and subtle emotion lazy? And shoegaze and new wave music is real music, unlike 99% of what is played on the radio.
Well, she has good talent in scene and postpro, but everybody crush when you go ahead and your current account go down, and finally she had to sell his rights. Popular digital business don't believe in photographers or another kind of artist that can show in one static paper, more than 1:30h of a film. They think that your work it isn't valued. From outside everything is amazing and you can think "great Annie", but the reality is other.
A the end, everything finish with: "Collaborative?" Bah!!
The role of the photographer is to construct that vision that no one else sees. Her retouchers (Box Studios presumably) merely realize her vision, a vision that is often not possible in reality.
Masterful photographers like Annie are praised for their IDEAS in designing that perfect photograph. Not so much in producing that final copy that goes into the magazine. That refinement is the work of retouchers.
It is easy to make that pictures when you have an arsenal of assistance , make up artists etc etc ! And yes when you have a professionist who edit your pictures ! I don't say about the best conditions and the best cameras ! Who said she just push the button is right ! Jerry Ghionis is the greatest !
I am currently in college for photography and just want to say wow, she is unreal... and just to say, yes photoshop is a great tool for photographers to use these days, but if your lighting, and your shot isn't impeccable to begin with no amount of photoshop in the world can fix your photo. So props to her and her team !
@HaasGrotesk just some minor changes are acceptable..when you give your photos to an external vendor for a radical post production, completing changing your image, i think the real artist is the guy working wtih photosshop and not the photographer..i've seen original shoots of Annie and let me say, they dont say anything..
Leiboviz=undistinguished photos, heavy postproduction (made by others....).
Well then you are right! As recent as today I took such a dull photo that really sucked but made it really good with the help of Photoshop. I don't know. I like the look of heavy post produced photos. I like Leibovitz photos but it's a bit disappointing that she doesn't post process herself.
@NinkaPanda exactly...is impossible to have the same annie's effect without computer editing...have you ever seen annie's film pictures without retouching? much much better and evocative.
@llss882 It's a collaborative work, but for many images, such as the Marie Antoinette Vogue shoot, the primary artist is the photographer. What happens when you retouch bad photography? You get decent photography. What happens when you retouch exceptional photography? You get a masterpiece.
There ARE cases where the retoucher becomes the primary artist, but not so much here.
she cares, she cares. i think this is over estimated, like when your model is kirsten dunst (was it?:) ) and you've such amazing sets and kick ass stylist. point and shoot. I guess i'm saying i think her portraiture requires a lot more skill and tact.
American Vogue sucks compared to the other Vogue's. Italian, Austrailian, french, German and English are far better magazines. Annie Wottabitch is a cunt!
@bladrunner6 wottabitch! LMAO! ahaha,, why would you say that though? not that im against you but im curious to know - i don't know what american vogue is like, i only have read british vogue...
@FuturisticXXL I'm refering to Anna Wintour, the editor and chief of America Vouge. Merryl Streep's role in The devil wears prada is based on her. Have you seen The September issue? (It's probably on Youtube) its a documentary about her and American Vogue. She's ruthless. She's actually British. Watch it and all will be revealed...
Boardline photography? because of a nude 15 year old? She looked like a child in the shoot? wasn't that the whole point? Miley to me looked like a little girl in a blanket?
You know. I will never be half the photographer she is, but I can't help but be a bit bored by Leibovitz. Her work is becoming stale and quite frankly uninspired.
The poses and compositions are formulaic and the only reason we are so impressed is because she placates to a Renaissance aesthetic which is about 300 years out-dated. But worst of all she doesn't say anything about her subjects individually. They are just "striking images" of famous people. *yawn*
Yeah, I think you're right. She has hands on that many professional gear. Everytime the same setup - big octabox, some head- and rimlights... I bow to her for her lifework, but...
For me it's more exciting to get good results with a small middle-proced equipment. There are a lot of photogs who would get the same pictures with this gear, the big team and not to forget the famous people.
Annie Leibovitz and Miley Cyrus and the famous ho shot..huge mistake for Leibovitz taking a photo like that of a 15 year old girl.,....shame shame shame
Since, we are thinking here,I think you would have to be a pretty crappy parent to allow someone to take a bunch of risqué and/or suggestive photos of a 15 year old girl in the fashion that Leibovitz did.
Annie Leibovitz photgraphed a farce. She is a victim of director Copolla who chose to portray Marie Antonette in a manner which is not based on actual history, they both know nothing about French history or culture. Genius? I think not.
Ya know, she wasn't making a history channel documentary. Don't be such a snob. I bet you didn't criticize the physics in whatever scifi movie you watched last.
You can take photographs in different formats...meaing you can shoot in what they call "raw", you can shoot in Jpeg, ect...but I'm sure that whatever she shoots in is super-duper high tech!
Its at all not about jpeg or raw!!.. I guarantee she is not shooting JPEG for high-end work like this...format means camera (neg/sensor)formats...In this clip she is seen using two formats...at 0:19 she is shooting with a medium format mamiya RZ 6x7 with with a polaroid back, then she is shooting with a full frame 35mm DLSR...(in this case a Canon 1DsMkii) then she switches again to the Mamiya 6x7. She is shooting color neg (film) with the RZ after checking exposure etc with the Polaroid back.
it was fucking gorgeous...the problem was that miley's fanbase is too young to understand it & the photo got a bad rep from the mainstream because miley is, mainstream.
It was in no way near nude, or pornography..she was completely covered and her parents were on set the whole time. If you appreciate photography you know that shot was beautiful...as Annie said, miley was ready to take that shot, her fans weren't..
thats true (robopencil)...its never about the gear...its all about vision and handling the dynamics of the situation at hand and having the stuff it takes to deliver under pressure. This is very demanding world and and thousands of talented (some even more talented than Annie) dont make it because they cant handle the dynamics of the business and what is demanded of them...
this photo shoot must cost a fortune i mean anna admitted herself. just the talent that was involved in the shoot. amazing. wheres the rest of the interview with anna?
Very enjoyable thank you
khijasmith 20 hours ago
The costumes in this film are really beautiful and look sort of contempary,especially the black gown.Sofia coppola and the crew did a brilliant job and if people are going to criticize this film,they should look up somthing called artistic licence
kingofcouture1996 1 week ago 2
really informative and interesting
xtremetom180 2 weeks ago
What a load of crap. I can't stand her.
canturgan 1 month ago
not bad!
fralo 1 month ago
this is beautiful, I really like Annie's works
NenadlPopovic 5 months ago
Gorgeous!
NYCinema 5 months ago
the woman can control a shoot.
photoheavy2009 5 months ago
MUY BUENO. :-)
greenther2008 6 months ago
Canon 5D Mark II, 24-105mm lens
GodIsAGirlz 6 months ago
Last scene has some masonry elements.
rucka12 8 months ago
shocks!! one of the best photo shoot I've seen..nice!!
robertsjredward 8 months ago
A lot of work. Kirsten Dunst seems so sweet.
glammie4 9 months ago 2
lol
sw33tnl 9 months ago
She is a hag.
IstvanN1961 9 months ago
she has the most surreal lightings for her photos...WOOOW! 2:38
videocrack246 9 months ago
Beautiful
IntroitusM 10 months ago
i went to her exhibition in sydney today. was awesome
jazeffect 11 months ago
Annie kept referring to Kirsten Dunst as Kristen!! Geez,as amazing as you are, you should make an effort to remember the name of the people you're working with! No excuse!!
DramaticallyAbbie 11 months ago
@DramaticallyAbbie Actually she was saying kirsten.....get over yourself
bittieoh95 6 months ago
Great work, Annie, I like you !
MrGunterguerrero 11 months ago
Beautiful.
GregWatermann 11 months ago
I liked it only coz I couldn't LOVE IT!
melaneye 1 year ago
I love her work. One of my favs.
Annie fans...add me on FB
facebook(dot)com/phil.alamo
ShallowDOF 1 year ago
That was therapy for the eyes... among MANY other POSITIVELY BEAUTIFUL things. Thank you for sharing.
Suspiciousbaglady 1 year ago
I loved the costumes in this movie and how they proved to the world JUST HOW AMAZING the 18th century was. HOWEVER, the speech and the music was just too modern for me. It was creatively lazy. They COULD have used something close enough to the way they used to speak to at least give a SENSE of history, and used slightly more classy music. But they didnt.....but i still do love the costumes. You cant get those at a halloween store!
snakedemon11 1 year ago
@snakedemon11 Is that a joke? Lazy? How is her creativity and subtle emotion lazy? And shoegaze and new wave music is real music, unlike 99% of what is played on the radio.
ilovetati91 1 year ago
I like the way she directs and cheer up herself, she transmit that emotion to the characters
momentodigital 1 year ago
Well, she has good talent in scene and postpro, but everybody crush when you go ahead and your current account go down, and finally she had to sell his rights. Popular digital business don't believe in photographers or another kind of artist that can show in one static paper, more than 1:30h of a film. They think that your work it isn't valued. From outside everything is amazing and you can think "great Annie", but the reality is other.
A the end, everything finish with: "Collaborative?" Bah!!
DanielGhedina 1 year ago
The role of the photographer is to construct that vision that no one else sees. Her retouchers (Box Studios presumably) merely realize her vision, a vision that is often not possible in reality.
Masterful photographers like Annie are praised for their IDEAS in designing that perfect photograph. Not so much in producing that final copy that goes into the magazine. That refinement is the work of retouchers.
AlboEcoSkit 1 year ago
Annie Leibovitz is the master
Bruce99100 1 year ago
Comprehension...
A passion to convey...
Striking feeling of...
Luxurious, silky & lavish...
Her eyes performed countless miracles...
Grasp strength...
Power to spin dreams...
©...Aronne
aarongluzman 1 year ago
It is easy to make that pictures when you have an arsenal of assistance , make up artists etc etc ! And yes when you have a professionist who edit your pictures ! I don't say about the best conditions and the best cameras ! Who said she just push the button is right ! Jerry Ghionis is the greatest !
PaulPetrutPhoto 1 year ago
LOVE GRACE ON THE BACKGROUND!!!!
pgsg69 1 year ago
Wow that photo turned out looking like an actual 18th century painting^^
Sw33tSm0k3 1 year ago
I am currently in college for photography and just want to say wow, she is unreal... and just to say, yes photoshop is a great tool for photographers to use these days, but if your lighting, and your shot isn't impeccable to begin with no amount of photoshop in the world can fix your photo. So props to her and her team !
damaizlondona 1 year ago
there's lot of photoshop in these pics
llss882 1 year ago
@llss882
So what!? You don't think people used to edit their pictures when they shot 35mm film?
HaasGrotesk 1 year ago
@HaasGrotesk just some minor changes are acceptable..when you give your photos to an external vendor for a radical post production, completing changing your image, i think the real artist is the guy working wtih photosshop and not the photographer..i've seen original shoots of Annie and let me say, they dont say anything..
Leiboviz=undistinguished photos, heavy postproduction (made by others....).
CartierBresson=masterpiece photo, minimal "handmade" editing.
that's wat i mean
llss882 1 year ago
@llss882
Well then you are right! As recent as today I took such a dull photo that really sucked but made it really good with the help of Photoshop. I don't know. I like the look of heavy post produced photos. I like Leibovitz photos but it's a bit disappointing that she doesn't post process herself.
Cartier Bresson is an art of it's own!
HaasGrotesk 1 year ago
@llss882 Wait? Are you saying those vivid colours and flawless faces are the work of post production? Not Annie's photography skills?
Like some of these pictures have beautiful lighting.... are you implying that they were aided with photoshop? If they are... I am so disappointed.. =(
NinkaPanda 1 year ago
@NinkaPanda exactly...is impossible to have the same annie's effect without computer editing...have you ever seen annie's film pictures without retouching? much much better and evocative.
llss882 1 year ago
@llss882 It's a collaborative work, but for many images, such as the Marie Antoinette Vogue shoot, the primary artist is the photographer. What happens when you retouch bad photography? You get decent photography. What happens when you retouch exceptional photography? You get a masterpiece.
There ARE cases where the retoucher becomes the primary artist, but not so much here.
AlboEcoSkit 1 year ago
Right. This is the American Liberal Elite at it's worst...aren't they all such "artistes"...
jupitermoon10011 1 year ago
i love a Grace....
emotool 1 year ago
she cares, she cares. i think this is over estimated, like when your model is kirsten dunst (was it?:) ) and you've such amazing sets and kick ass stylist. point and shoot. I guess i'm saying i think her portraiture requires a lot more skill and tact.
laserspatula 1 year ago
Anna!
Sweetdispo 1 year ago
annie is a genious!!!!!
Agustina688 1 year ago
This woman takes some amazing photos!
ComradeDragon 1 year ago
What a cool idea - posing contemporary subjects to imitate familiar works of art. - not new of course- but would be fun to try to do .
maggyrosie 1 year ago
Responder a este vídeo...
lareinaadolecente 1 year ago
oh so thats how they did it, its my desktop bg!
kathycks 1 year ago
she's amazing
fal2grace1 1 year ago
anna wintour said the same about mario testino... she is all fake.
DanielCMM 1 year ago
somebody know the soprano name?
pietrit 1 year ago
American Vogue sucks compared to the other Vogue's. Italian, Austrailian, french, German and English are far better magazines. Annie Wottabitch is a cunt!
bladrunner6 1 year ago
@bladrunner6 wottabitch! LMAO! ahaha,, why would you say that though? not that im against you but im curious to know - i don't know what american vogue is like, i only have read british vogue...
FuturisticXXL 1 year ago
@FuturisticXXL I'm refering to Anna Wintour, the editor and chief of America Vouge. Merryl Streep's role in The devil wears prada is based on her. Have you seen The September issue? (It's probably on Youtube) its a documentary about her and American Vogue. She's ruthless. She's actually British. Watch it and all will be revealed...
bladrunner6 1 year ago
@FuturisticXXL sorry about the spelling mistakes in my last message, i'm just about to go out and rushing lol
bladrunner6 1 year ago
i love the dress..all of them especially the last one..pink.. amazing..!!!
michaelwindar 1 year ago
Boardline photography? because of a nude 15 year old? She looked like a child in the shoot? wasn't that the whole point? Miley to me looked like a little girl in a blanket?
gatersy 1 year ago
i love how the lines on the dress and floor contrast in that last shot.
LoveForAAR 1 year ago 2
what's with the wonder woman link? lol
thedeetzes 2 years ago
I never thought of any of this when I visited Versailles.
ambera15 2 years ago 2
You know. I will never be half the photographer she is, but I can't help but be a bit bored by Leibovitz. Her work is becoming stale and quite frankly uninspired.
The poses and compositions are formulaic and the only reason we are so impressed is because she placates to a Renaissance aesthetic which is about 300 years out-dated. But worst of all she doesn't say anything about her subjects individually. They are just "striking images" of famous people. *yawn*
nametroubles 2 years ago 2
Yeah, I think you're right. She has hands on that many professional gear. Everytime the same setup - big octabox, some head- and rimlights... I bow to her for her lifework, but...
For me it's more exciting to get good results with a small middle-proced equipment. There are a lot of photogs who would get the same pictures with this gear, the big team and not to forget the famous people.
Just my two cents... ;-)
simonsenphoto 2 years ago
I found this a quite meaningless quest.
Iustknott 2 years ago
Annie Leibovitz and Miley Cyrus and the famous ho shot..huge mistake for Leibovitz taking a photo like that of a 15 year old girl.,....shame shame shame
acybersleuth66 2 years ago
Its not shameful only to perverted mids..lol
sesaw7 2 years ago 2
@acybersleuth66 I think you have to be pretty dirty to see that image as anything perverse....
nametroubles 2 years ago 2
@nametroubles
Since, we are thinking here,I think you would have to be a pretty crappy parent to allow someone to take a bunch of risqué and/or suggestive photos of a 15 year old girl in the fashion that Leibovitz did.
acybersleuth66 2 years ago
@acybersleuth66 it was innocent and artistic. Give me a break.
thedeetzes 2 years ago 2
Annie Leibovitz photgraphed a farce. She is a victim of director Copolla who chose to portray Marie Antonette in a manner which is not based on actual history, they both know nothing about French history or culture. Genius? I think not.
RobertBarto 2 years ago
She isn't a historian, she is a photographer who is getting paid to do a shoot for a movie. Lighten up!
Incredible43 2 years ago
I agree, but I think Sophia was trying to give Marie Antoinette more of a Clueless kinda look...
sesaw7 2 years ago
Ya know, she wasn't making a history channel documentary. Don't be such a snob. I bet you didn't criticize the physics in whatever scifi movie you watched last.
u1008394 2 years ago 39
I wish I could do photoshoots like this for my music and fashion stufff...WOW she's good!!!
EisaniSteelz 2 years ago
what does she mean when she says " i'm going to another format"?
what is a format?
freshfaceex3 2 years ago
You can take photographs in different formats...meaing you can shoot in what they call "raw", you can shoot in Jpeg, ect...but I'm sure that whatever she shoots in is super-duper high tech!
EisaniSteelz 2 years ago
Its at all not about jpeg or raw!!.. I guarantee she is not shooting JPEG for high-end work like this...format means camera (neg/sensor)formats...In this clip she is seen using two formats...at 0:19 she is shooting with a medium format mamiya RZ 6x7 with with a polaroid back, then she is shooting with a full frame 35mm DLSR...(in this case a Canon 1DsMkii) then she switches again to the Mamiya 6x7. She is shooting color neg (film) with the RZ after checking exposure etc with the Polaroid back.
ldhorricks 2 years ago 8
My mistake...I just misunderstood from the person whom I got the information from
EisaniSteelz 2 years ago
No problem...sorry I didnt mean to come across as chastising you...I should have left out the exclamation marks...
ldhorricks 2 years ago
LOL! Its no problem!
EisaniSteelz 2 years ago
Paolo Pizzetti will win.
marcotogniphoto 2 years ago
the historic photo shoot is an art form
arrecotinarrecotan 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wheres the famous ho shot of the 15 year old? .. Miley Cyrus
Maybe Annie Leibovitz is not so proud of that one!
acybersleuth66 2 years ago
Please, your mocking a genius.
gavint84 2 years ago
Please, ..you must be an idiot, only the truth was told.
And, if you cant handle the truth you shouldnt be here.
.
acybersleuth66 2 years ago
why wouldn't she be proud of that shot?
it was fucking gorgeous...the problem was that miley's fanbase is too young to understand it & the photo got a bad rep from the mainstream because miley is, mainstream.
freshfaceex3 2 years ago
Gorgeous? .maybe more correctly......borderline pornography...
One should take into account ones age when doing a photo shoot like that...
But then maybe youre okay with someone taking near nude photos of underage girls?
.
acybersleuth66 2 years ago
It was in no way near nude, or pornography..she was completely covered and her parents were on set the whole time. If you appreciate photography you know that shot was beautiful...as Annie said, miley was ready to take that shot, her fans weren't..
freshfaceex3 2 years ago
Sorry (Fresh-feces) that is incorrect,..her father left her there after only a few minutes discussing the,.. shot
And even though Miley said she was ready...she was a minor.....15 years old....
Get a clue, dolt
.
acybersleuth66 2 years ago
is she related to franz lebowitz
marrieter08 2 years ago
People really under-estimate how much skill and talent it takes to make an amazing photo.
Not just a lot of technical knowledge, but a very good artistic mind.
You could give your average joe a $5000 camera, and they just wouldn't be able to snap pictures that are as beautiful and stylistic as the pros.
Robopencil 2 years ago 7
thats true (robopencil)...its never about the gear...its all about vision and handling the dynamics of the situation at hand and having the stuff it takes to deliver under pressure. This is very demanding world and and thousands of talented (some even more talented than Annie) dont make it because they cant handle the dynamics of the business and what is demanded of them...
ldhorricks 2 years ago
i'd love to be a pro photographer.
belleinabox 2 years ago 2
Yes, Ann Wintour..., Annie cares about her work, but she's now $24 M in debt! No budgets? HELLO!
lizaheider 2 years ago 3
a ga ga ga ga ga ga gaH!
circusmidgitte 2 years ago
turns out AL was a big, fat spendthrift just like M-A
BernardProfitendieu 2 years ago
wow photo shoots take more works that I ever thought.
PlainYork 2 years ago 30
yes they do. and lots of planning and problems too.
LatasianDevil 2 years ago 2
Definetly have an admiration for photography. It is a beautiful art however it doesnt just happen lol.
PlainYork 2 years ago
How many formats does she actually use and why.. She is using 35mm, medium and large format.. ..damn.
BlaatQ 2 years ago
she actually just started using digital in the last 2-3 years and did everything with film up until then.
speedgrafer 2 years ago 2
that is Vivienne Westwood. that is soo amazing isn't it? I would have died to be on that shoot or just working on that movie set.
mipos86 2 years ago 2
at 0;42, the woman by the window, is that Vivienne Westwood?
Hester2410 2 years ago
No, it's Grace Coddington- Vogue's creative director.
imthecalciumkid 2 years ago
So amazing! The photo's are stunning! I love the 1700s in france...ware everyware else things were dull they were amazing!
chris812125 2 years ago 2
Anna, in the end of the video, has to tell herself THREE TIMES that Leibovitz is worth the money! She's not very convincing...
karelpolt 2 years ago 4
this photo shoot must cost a fortune i mean anna admitted herself. just the talent that was involved in the shoot. amazing. wheres the rest of the interview with anna?
kanzaki88 2 years ago
She did a fantastic job.
1lullabye1 2 years ago 2
annie leibovitz? I like her.
198717sql 2 years ago 2
it's MarIE Antoinette ;)
PiepMiau2 2 years ago
Oh my God, those strobes sounds like bombs
dgncadiz 3 years ago