I think AX2000 is better than CX500. i compare the stablization, details, color and white balance. For me, the AX2000's color is more nature than CX500.
This is an excellent test. The CX500 did extremely well considering its huge price gap between it and the AX2000. I believe the blown-out of the vertical neon( or LED?) sign in the background might be or partly be because of the difference in the exposure levels with the exposure on the CX500 being set slightly higher.
Anyway thanks for taking your time and efforts setting up this test.
あ～、
ダメだ。
これ見てると、自分の民生用ビデオカメラがダサくてしょうがない・・・
やっぱ、業務用（ハイアマ機）はいいですね＾＾
YUUSUKLELL 1 year ago
from the looks of it the cx500 has better whit balance or the settings are not the same
bcnewsvideo 1 year ago
I think AX2000 is better than CX500. i compare the stablization, details, color and white balance. For me, the AX2000's color is more nature than CX500.
wesleydesignstudio 1 year ago
Is it true that you cannot set exposure to full manual on the AX2000; that the camera will always set the exposure in auto?
CINECAMARATV 2 years ago
does anyone know if the ax2000 can write in both flash cards at the same time? Thus having the same footage in both cards (for safety reasons)
VOATfilms 2 years ago
@VOATfilms
Only one at the time.
tony1984 1 year ago
Would like to see the white balance on the AX2000 set to match the white balance on the CX500.
CINECAMARATV 2 years ago
This is an excellent test. The CX500 did extremely well considering its huge price gap between it and the AX2000. I believe the blown-out of the vertical neon( or LED?) sign in the background might be or partly be because of the difference in the exposure levels with the exposure on the CX500 being set slightly higher.
Anyway thanks for taking your time and efforts setting up this test.
panmaew 2 years ago
cx500 better??? what the hell!!!!
platerplane 2 years ago
@platerplane
AX2000 has wider dynamic range
Look at the LED signs in the back
CX500 only shows white but AX2000 shows the red as well
tony1984 2 years ago